Framemaker 8 and 64-bit OS

I'm considering buying a new laptop and was wondering if anyone knows whether Framemaker 8 will run OK under a 64-bit operating system.

Follow-up question: What about licensing?
I have FM installed on a desktop and a laptop under Win XP 32-bit. Recently, I installed a 64-bit OS (Win7) on a 2nd hard disk on the desktop. I can boot to Win XP 32-bit or to Win 7 64-bit on the desktop.
Can I install and register the same FM to the 64-bit partition without problem? Of course, I'd still be using only one instance of FM at a time, but I'd have 3 installations.

Similar Messages

  • Framemaker and Parallels for mac

    (moving this over from another thread)
    We decided to go with Framemaker and mac, and I'm using Windows Parallels 5 to make that happen on a virtual machine. This works well, for the most part, as it means I dont have to leave my native (mac) environment or my mac applications including (mail etc) notifications.
    I am working with Framemaker 9 - creating DITA standard xml files for a help system.  So far the only technical glitch is - the edit/undo buttons are now grayed out - unaccountably.
    If anyone has similar experiences - any solutions? My current Parallels 5 is up to date with recent updates.
    thanks,
    John

    neuropod wrote:
    Peter,
    Thanks so much for your reply.  I tried your suggestions, but to no avail.  I then spent quite a bit of quality time with Adobe technical support, and they were very helpful, and got me on my way.  Just in case anyone else with similar issues should come across this thread I will describe some of the issues. 
    BTW - John, now that I have FM9 running, I have not experienced the nonfunctioning UNDO command that you described in the original post.  Sorry.  I will let you know if it occurs in a delayed fashion as yours did.
    For anyone who just installed Parallels and then Windows XP, what I found out is that many of the components in XP are very old school.  Flash is way out of date, Explorer is, too.  This may impair the functioning of the extractor, I am not sure.  As a Mac user, some of these issues were foreign to me.  I just wanted to run Windows so I could use FrameMaker on my Mac.
    First I had to update Flash, and to do this I downloaded the latest version of the FireFox-Mozilla web-browser (or you could update MS Explorer). 
    Once we had all of these components up-to-date, we were still running into problems with file extraction, and the Tech Support person had me load a program called WinRAR (google it) which seemed to be a more configureable extractor than the default one that comes with the FrameMaker download.  Using WinRAR we extracted the files into the Programs folder (once WinRAR was installed, the generic box icon for the extraction program changed to a normal looking icon).  This may all be possible using the default extractor, I just don't know.
    And a final for-what-its worth: before going the Parallels route, I tried installing SheepShaver to run Classic on my MacBook Pro so I could continue to run my Mac copy of Frame v7.  SheepShaver may be OK for getting your old games and simple programs up and running, but it did not seem anywhere near stable enough to get something like FrameMaker running with a long document with graphics and cross references. 
    Final working configuration: FrameMaker 9 on Win XP SP2 on Snow Leopard 10.6.3 on a 17" MacBook Pro with Intel Core i7 processors (April 2010 model) and Parallels 5, 8 GB RAM. Seems to work so far, I have imported my old FrameMaker 7 Mac files (didn't even have to save them as MIFs!).  Now I need to relearn Frame in the "Parallel" universe of Windows.
    Time spent monkeying around with SheepShaver, trying InDesign as a substitute for FrameMaker (close, but not close enough), downloading and installing Parallels/Windows XP and trying all kinds of tricks to get iFrameMaker running and then being on-hold/on-line with Adobe tech support: 16+ hours.
    Getting FrameMaker running again on my main machine: Priceless!
    -Mark Greenberg
    Hi, Mark:
    I wish everyone keeps a copy of this post, so they could present your positive Adobe tech-support experience when someone posts a polar-opposite bad Adobe tech-support experience.
    D'ja ever notice that you find something that you lost in the last place you looked? Because you don't need to look further, right? Glad you got a working combination.
    I didn't have any special problems installing Parallels, Windows XP, and FrameMaker on my Mac (hardware and OS described in another post on this thread,) but I've been bi-platform for a long time. Actually, I began with Virtual PC on a much weaker Mac running OS 9 years ago, which I abandoned because of the poor performance, due almost entirely to the underpowered Mac. On my current Mac, I began with VMware's Fusion 2, then 3, but found it quirky enough to try Parallels5, which seemed smoother, and offered an inexpensive side-grade, followed by inexpensive deals to upgrade to Parallels 6.
    I'm interested in what shortcomings you found with InDesign for your purposes. If you think not too many folks would be interested, please send private forum email by clicking on my name and looking for send private message.
    Regards,
    Peter
    Peter Gold
    KnowHow ProServices

  • RoboHelp for FrameMaker and FrameMaker 8

    I still use the legendary, yet discontinued and unsupported, "RoboHelp for FrameMaker". However, when I installed my new Tech Comm Suite and FM 8. RoboHelp for FrameMaker would not work with FM 8. I know this is a long shot, but does anyone know a workaround to get the defunct RoboHelp for FrameMaker to work with FrameMaker 8? Please do not suggest using RoboHelp to convert the files. That engine is terrible. Also, RoboHelp for FrameMaker, four years later, is still better than mif2go and ePublisher by Webworks.

    Mark,
    I meant RH for FrameMaker, and ..
    "... RH for FM uses skins, it creates a web help system with a collapsible/expandable TOC, integrated client-side search engine, a better interface for mapping of styles and including or excluding conditional text, and it publishes to a web server. There are many other features."
    You can easily substitute RH for FM with ePublisher and add quite a bit more. Since ePublisher to a great extend relies on XML there are so many other cool things you can do.
    I am NOT saying it is easier, just that I like it more, and that it supports all of FM's features (incl. 8). The jobs I'm doing at the moment in ePublsher cannot yet be made by RH for FM. (Also I'm integrating both FM and Word and some xMetal XML output into the same help system!
    But again it's a matter of opinion. And what you need to accomplish
    In a recent seminar by RJ Jacquez from Adobe he admitted that the Tech Com Suite (and RH for FM) was an entry to the market and that they had some way to go yet for RH to 'compete' with ePublisher.
    On the price side I quite agree. WebWorks has some pretty steep prices. Which at the same are completely and utterly impossible to understand. I have been given threee different prices for the same solution! Just to mention.
    keep smiling
    thomas

  • Creation of Add-on package for 64 bit and 32 bit SAP Business One Client

    Please help me creating package for 64 bit and 32 bit SAP Business One. If Add-on executable is compiled with x86 option then there is no issue of connecting Add-on with 32 bit SAP Business one and if Add-on executable is compiled with Any CPU option then there is no issue of connecting Add-on with 64 bit SAP Business one. Problems are mentioned as below
    1. My Add-on uses MS ACCESS connection and the connection is read using Jet OLEDB 4.0 provider. It works fine for x86 compile mode but not when compile mode is Any CPU. I searched for the issue on Google and found a solution to change MS ACCESS connection provider to ACE.OLEDB.12.0 but again ACE provider is installed according to the Office version i.e. 32 bit or 64 bit office suite. If I install 32 bit ACE provider then Add-on executable compiled with x86 version is working fine but with Any CPU option throws error as provider is not registered on current machine.
    2. Secodly, our license validation activex dll is build using vb 6.0 and therefore when Add-on executable is compiled using Any CPU option, Add-on EXE cannot read from license dll. Any suggestion, how the activeX dll can be compiled whose component can be created from for X86 compiled exe and any cpu compiled exe.
    Please help because we are stuck in this issue and cannot move forward.
    Thanks.

    Hi Alejandro,
    That is one solution but did your add on used ms access connection? if you used Jet oledb to connection string or ace oledb connection string? what if 32 bit office is installed and what if 64 office is installed? how did you found the office version in install script? after determining the office version how did you installed Microsoft redistributable for ace oledb (32 bit or 64 bi )?
    I am sorry that I asked many questions but these are the problems where I am stuck with the addon installer?
    Thanks

  • What is difference between 32 bit and 64 bit sql server memory management

    What is difference between 32 bit and 64 bit sql server memory management
    Thanks
    Shashikala

    This is the basic difference...check if helps:
    A 32-bit CPU running 32-bit software (also known as the x86 platform) is so named because it is based on an architecture that can manipulate values that are up to 32 bits in length. This means that a 32-bit memory pointer can store a value between 0 and
    4,294,967,295 to reference a memory address. This equates to a maximum addressable space of 4GB on 32-bit platforms
    On the other hand 64-bit limit of 18,446,744,073,709,551,616, this number is so large that in memory/storage terminology it equates to 16 exabytes. You don’t come across that term very often, so to help understand the scale, here is the value converted to
    more commonly used measurements: 16 exabytes = 16,777,216 petabytes (16 million PB)➤ 17,179,869,184 terabytes (17 billion TB)➤ 17,592,186,044,416 gigabytes (17 trillion GB)➤
    As you can see, it is significantly larger than the 4GB virtual address space usable in 32-bit systems; it’s so large in fact that any hardware capable of using it all is sadly restricted to the realm of science fiction. Because of this, processor manufacturers
    decided to only implement a 44-bit address bus, which provides a virtual address space on 64-bit systems of 16TB. This was regarded as being more than enough address space for the foreseeable future and logically it’s split into an 8TB range for user mode
    and 8TB for kernel mode. Each 64-bit process running on an x64 platform will be able to address up to 8TB of VAS.
    Please click the Mark as answer button and vote as helpful if this reply solves your problem

  • Using the same license key for 32 bit version and 64 bit version of MS Office 2013

    Can you use the same key code for MS Office 2013 for both the 32 bit and 64 bit?

    Hi,
    You can choose either 32 bit or 64 bit install before you use the Product Key.
    But as Hans mentioned, if you use the product key on both, it will count as two installs of Office and you may get the error like "The Product Key is invalid".
    Regards,
    Melon Chen
    TechNet Community Support
    It's recommended to download and install
    Configuration Analyzer Tool (OffCAT), which is developed by Microsoft Support teams. Once the tool is installed, you can run it at any time to scan for hundreds of known issues in Office
    programs.

  • Vista 64 bit and 32 bit. and CS4 basic

    I have both 64 and 32 bit Vista UL. would I see a advantage installing the
    64 bit windows?

    I have 64 bit duo core and 8 gigs of memory.
    "Bob Levine" wrote in message news:[email protected]..
    > Depends on the work you do and how much RAM you feed it.
    >
    > Bob

  • I've had my ipod shuffle (2nd generation) for a long time now and after a year and a bit of not being in use it doesn't work. When I connect it to the computer it doesn't come up. Can my ipod be charged or fixed?

    I've had my ipod shuffle (2nd generation) for a long time now and after a year and a bit of not being in use it doesn't work. When I connect it to the computer it doesn't come up. Can my ipod be charged or fixed? Please help!

    That is about normal. You can maximize battery life by changing some settings. See:
    Apple - Batteries - iPod
    Apple will exchange your iPod for a refurbished one for with a new battery for $79. They do not fix yours.
    Apple - iPod Repair price                       
    A third-party place like the following will replace your battery for less. Google for more.
    iPhone Repair, Service & Parts: iPod Touch, iPad, MacBook Pro Screens
    Replace the battery yourself if you are up to it. You can purchase a replacment for about $10
    iPod Touch Repair – iFixit                  

  • Can't burn cd's using iTunes 7.3 and 64-bit Windows Vista Ultimate

    Every time I try to burn a CD I get the following error:
    "Disc Burner or Software Not Found"
    I have checked Device Manager and no problems with the disc burner there. I've even burned cd's from Windows Media Player(and dvd movies with other programs), but I would prefer using iTunes 7.3 to burn cd's. From reading the discussions it is my understanding that iTunes cd burning functionality doesn't work with 64-bit versions of Windows XP and Windows Vista. Is there a fix for this? Please advise.

    Here's how to get Itunes to work in Vista and XP64 bit:
    Start Menu -> All Programs -> Accessories -> Right Click on Command Prompt -> Run As Administrator.
    Type “cd C:\Windows\SysWOW64″
    Type regsvr32 vbscript.dll
    If you don’t do Run as Administrator, the regsvr32 will fail. Also, be careful to run the command in SysWOW64, not System32! System32 on a 64-bit system actually contains the 64-bit system libraries.

  • Running 64 Bit and 32 bit CS5 simultaneously?

    I am delighted with my preliminary tests on CS5. However, one problem is that all my plugins (and Photoshop's own Lighting Effects) have disappeared. The solution is of course to run in 32 bit. To have close to close PS, go into Info to change its startup setting and then restart, and then repeat the whole process over again when I am finished with my plugin, is very tedious. So to make this easier I duplicated just the PS App file inside the CS5 directory and set the copy to run in 32 bit. So it is quick and easy to start whichever 64 or 32 bit PS I want without having to open Info and change the startup setting each time.
    I have discovered, somewhat to my surprise, that I can run the two at the same time, apparently without conflict. This means I can simply open 32 bit when needed for a plugin and move the layer I am filtering back and forth via the clipboard. It's not ideal but it will do for now.
    So two questions:
    1) When I open the 32 bit version (the copy I made from the original installed app) I get a message "The application has been moved, and its path has changed. To update the product configuration, click Update." If I accept this and click update then the next time I try to run the original version I get the same message and have to update again to restore it. However if I just ignore the message each time the 32 bit version opens and don't update it seems to run fine with all my preferences and settings intact. Can anyone tell me what the implications of this message are and whether I can safely ignore it?
    2) Am I courting disaster anyway running 64 and 32 bit side by side like this?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    David Mac

    David,
    Essentially there is only one application and when you create multiple copies still then it point to one single binary , the location of which gets stored in a particular file.
    Now when you launch the other Copy then the new location gets updated in that file. And again when you open original then also the location gets updated.
    So it is advisable not to do so , but if you face any issues just remove the other copy and update the location with just one app.

  • Essbase Excel Addin on 64 Bit Windows 7 and 64 bit Office 2010

    Hi Everyone,
    I have installed 11.1.2.2 on server with Essbase and Shared Services.
    Now, on the client I have 64 bit Windows 7 and 64 bit office 2010.
    I tried installing Excel Addin client only (without Essbase client) and restarted machine after install.
    After install Addin didnt come up automatically and i tried to manually set the add-in, I'm getting an error "This is not a valid add-in"
    Is it because i am using 64 bit of office and have to go back to 32 bit.
    Isnt 64 bit supported for latest 11.1.2.2 Essbase ?
    Any ideas or experience in this regard will be helpful to me as our company is going for Windows 7 and Office 2010 across the business users and if 64 bit Office is not supported or has issues i would have to suggest them to go with 32 bit Office 2010.
    Thank you.

    for 64 bit i guess its not avaiable for 2010 excel
    but you can download 9 version or 11.1.1.3 with patch below is link.. its just a client ~~~
    https://support.oracle.com/CSP/ui/flash.html#tab=PatchHomePage(page=PatchHomePage&id=gj46o799()),(page=PatchSearchResultsHome&id=gj46pr1y(search=%3CSearch%3E%0A%20%20%3CFilter%20name=%22patch_number%22%20op=%22IS%22%20value=%2210383144%22%20type=%22patch_number%22/%3E%0A%20%20%3CFilter%20name=%22platform%22%20op=%22IS%22%20value=%22%22%20type=%22platform%22/%3E%0A%3C/Search%3E&incFamilyProds=false&flag=search))
    ~~~More info from oracle support ~~~~
    Support for Microsoft Office 2010 has been added to the following releases:
    Smart View:
    Essbase v9.3.3 for Client Third Party Software.
    Smart View v11.1.1.3.02. This release is available as Patch 9889521. It offers support for 32-bit Office 2010 for Smart View only.
    Smart View v11.1.2.1. Download the EPM System Release 11.1.2 Smart View for 32 bit Office 2010 from Oracle Software Delivery Cloud. Select the Product Pack "Oracle Enterprise Performance Management System" and the appropriate Platform.
    Excel Add-in:
    Essbase v9.3.3 for Client Third Party Software.
    The Support Matrix and documentation for 9.3.3 can be found at: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E10530_01/doc/nav/portal_1.htm
    Oracle Hyperion Essbase Client 11.1.1.3.500.. This release is available as Patch 10383144.
    Essbase v11.1.2.1. Download the EPM System Release 11.1.2 Excel Add-In for 32 bit Office 2010 from Oracle Software Delivery Cloud. Select the Product Pack "Oracle Enterprise Performance Management System" and the appropriate Platform.
    Note: 64-bit Office is not currently supported as of December 2011.   However, it is planned to be supported with SmartView only in the next release which is due early 2012.  The classic Excel add-in will not support 64 bit Office regardless of version

  • How to set up the interaction between InDesign CS6 8.0 and Photoshop CS 6 - if Photoshop is installed and the 64 and 32-bit?? default InDesign refers to the 64-bit version of Photoshop and scripts do not work.

    how to set up the interaction between InDesign CS6 8.0 and Photoshop CS 6 - if Photoshop is installed and the 64 and 32-bit?? default InDesign refers to the 64-bit version of Photoshop and scripts do not work.

    Nice of you to point it out here as I at least don’t follow Mr.Nash’s blog regularly.

  • How to get 64-bit install and 32-bit client to work on 1 pc

    I have installed a full 64-bit 11g R2 install on my Windows 7 D: drive, installed two DB's, worked great. Then I realized application I need to support requires 32-bit client (for drivers) so I installed the 11g client also.
    My problem is that my registry only shows one ORACLE_HOME--the 64-bit full install whereas Cognos reqs to point to 32-bit client.
    Sqlplus in 64-bit works fine (D:\oracle\app\dock\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1\BIN\sqlplus.exe) whereas the 32-bit client sqlplus (D:\oracle\client\app\dock\product\11.2.0\client_1\BIN\sqlplus.exe) does not work. The error is:
    ORA-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error
    If I open cmd prompt and navigate to 32-bit sqlplus under client this WILL work to login (but then I noticed it was using the 64-bit ORACLE_HOME and PATH settings if I typed set). In order to fix Cognos, I changed my ORACLE_HOME and path to point to the 32-bit client (i.e. from D:\oracle\app\dock\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1 to
    ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\client\app\dock\product\11.2.0\client_1
    PATH = D:\oracle\client\app\dock\product\11.2.0\client_1\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\NVIDIA Corporation\PhysX\Common;%SystemRoot%\system32;%SystemRoot%;%SystemRoot%\System32\Wbem;%SYSTEMROOT%\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Program Files\ThinkPad\Bluetooth Software\;C:\Program Files\ThinkPad\Bluetooth Software\syswow64;C:\Program Files\Intel\WiFi\bin\;C:\Program Files\Common Files\Intel\WirelessCommon\
    Guess what? This stopped both the 64-bit and 32-bit sqlplus from working, even after bouncing the computer. Now the listener (64-bit) OracleOraDb11g_home1TNSListener will also not start either.
    Sooooo, I think I need to set the OH and PATH back to the 64-bit as that is what the Listener requires but any ideas how to get the 32-bit sqlplus to also work?!?
    Thanks in advance for any help!

    lo**** wrote:
    My problem is that my registry only shows one ORACLE_HOME--the 64-bit full install whereas Cognos reqs to point to 32-bit client. The env/reg variables probably do exist/show, only in the right place. In Win 64-bit, there's a separate branch of reg entries for 32-bit (look for WoW6432Node).
    >
    ... whereas the 32-bit client sqlplus (D:\oracle\client\app\dock\product\11.2.0\client_1\BIN\sqlplus.exe) does not work. The error is:
    ORA-12560: TNS:protocol adapter errorIt works as expected. Since there is no Oracle instance in the Client home (no surprise), you can't connect "locally" from the 32-bit sqlplus. I.e. you need to use "...@connectident" in the connect string.
    In order to fix Cognos, I changed my ORACLE_HOME and path to point to the 32-bit client (i.e. from D:\oracle\app\dock\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1 toOn Windows platform, ORACLE_HOME should not be set by user (it is already set by installer, in the Registry).
    To pick up proper settings, PATH need to be set or used.
    >
    Sooooo, I think I need to set the OH and PATH back to the 64-bit as that is what the Listener requires but any ideas how to get the 32-bit sqlplus to also work?!?Please remove OH from env system settings.
    Multiple homes on Windows is often a source of problems, since extra consideration and setup is needed more than just installing the software.
    If "Cognos" relies on system PATH, then one way to go might be:
    - put path to 32-bit Client bin folder first in PATH
    - set up a shortcut to command window with only 64-bit in PATH, for times when you need to administer the database via command line.

  • PS4 and 64 bit Win 7 on a laptop... What problems am I in for?

    I'm a noobie to laptops, and I can't live without my Wacom tablet and pen.  I'd appreciate knowing how detail drawings are done by PS 4 or other users  with this OS and what problems 64 bit will create with this software.
    Some laptop questions too: I noticed a response somewhere to use 32 bit in Win 7, and I didn't know  you had a choice. True?
                                              Are there some laptops that have both battery and wall plug availability?
                                              Can I still use my tablet and pen via a usb port?
    I'm very worried about this software update and I'd appreciate knowing what problems changing from a good PC to a laptop I'll have to deal with.  Thanks so much..MM

    Photoshop installs both 32-bit and 64-bit versions. On Vista, and I assume Win7, the 64-bit is intalled in the "Program Files" directory, and the 32-bit in the "Program Files (x86)" directory. The two versions look indentical in use, but many legacy plug-ins will not work in the 64-bit version. Be sure to set your desktop shortcuts and file associations to the one you use most often.
    Laptops have various battery run time capacities. I used to have a Toshiba that had a big, beautiful 17" screen, but it was large, heavy, ran very warm, and gave me less than one hour on a charge. I replaced it with anAcer Timeline model that gives me over seven hours per charge. It is very lightweight and portable, but the downside is that the thin 13" screen has an extremely narrow angle of view. It does have video and HDMI out, though, so I can use a regular monitor or HDTV, so it's not that big a deal. I really like that I can carry it in a bag without dislocating my shoulder .
    I'm using a Wacom Intuous with it with no issues.

  • Dual Boot 32 and 64 Bit Xp Pro - boot.ini changes

      Well I am up and running both 32 Bit and 64 Bit XP Pro and initially 64 Bit has a few lags up on me.  System is as follows
    MSI K8N Neo4 Plat with AMD Athlon 64 3000, 2 X Corsair 512-3200C2PT (1GB RAM), Western Digital WD2500JD Caviar SE, WD360 Raptor, WD2500BB Caviar, Seagate ST3300831A, Plextor 712A & 716A, Samsung 816A, ATI X600 All-in-Wonder with 256MB RAM, Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS.
      I used the 32bit drivers provided on a disk and for 64 Bit I was able to get ATI, nVidia, and that is all.  Bot 32bit and 64 bit are working well.  On several occasions more often than not.  i have to edit the boot.ini to add back in the 64 bit option.  Why?  I can not link the deletion to anything specific.  Now if it is supposed to delete to option that woul dbe a new one.
    Any thoughts?

    Did you write the initial boot.ini file or is it one that Windows automatically wrote for you?  Are the two OS's on the same HDD or on different HDD's?  Which OS did you install last?
    The Windows written boot.ini has always worked fine for me.  If you installed Win 64 first and then Win 32, that could cause problems.

  • Best practice for managing a Windows 7 deployment with both 32-bit and 64-bit?

    What is the best practice for creating and organizing deployment shares in MDT for a Windows 7 deployment that has mostly 32-bit computers, but a few 64-bit computers as well? Is it better to create a single deployment share for Windows 7 and include both
    versions, or is it better to create two separate deployment shares? And what about 32-bit and 64-bit versions of applications?
    I'm currently leaning towards creating two separate deployment shares, just so that I don't have to keep typing (x86) and (x64) for every application I import, as well as making it easier when choosing applications in the Lite Touch installation. But I know
    each deployment share has the option to create both an x86 and x64 boot image, so that's why I am confused. 

    Supporting two task sequences is way easier than supporting two shares. Two shares means two boot media, or maintaining a method of directing the user to one or the other. Everything needs to be imported or configured twice. Not to mention doubling storage
    space. MDT is designed to have multiple task sequences, why wouldn't you use them?
    Supporting multiple task sequences can be a pain, but not bad once you get a system. Supporting app installs intelligently is a large part of that. We have one folder per app install, with a wrapper vbscript that handles OS detection. If there are separate
    binaries, they are placed in x86 and x64 subfolders. Everything runs from one folder via the same command, "cscript install.vbs". So, import once, assign once, and forget it. Its the same install package we use for Altiris, and we'll be using a Powershell
    version of it when we fully migrate to SCCM.
    Others handle x86 and x64 apps separately, and use the MDT app details to select what platform the app is meant for. I've done that, but we have a template for the vbscript wrapper and its a standard process, I believe its easier. YMMV.
    Once you get your apps into MDT, create bundles. Core build bundle, core deploy bundle, Laptop deploy bundle, etcetera. Now you don't have to assign twenty apps to both task sequences, just one bundle. When you replace one app in the bundle, all TS'es are
    updated automatically. Its kind of the same mentality as active directory. Users, groups and resources = apps, bundles and task sequences.
    If you have separate build and deploy shares in your lab, great. If not, separate your apps into build and deploy folders in your lab MDT share. Use a selection profile to upload only your deploy side to production. In fact I separate everything (except
    drivers) into Build and deploy folders on my lab server. Don't mix build and deploy, and don't mix Lab/QA and production. I also keep a "Retired" folder. When I replace an app, TS, OS, etcetera, I move it to the retired folder and append "RETIRED - " to the
    front of it  so I can instantly spot it if it happens to show up somewhere it shouldn't.
    To me, the biggest "weakness" of MDT is its flexibility. There's literally a dozen different ways to do everything, and there's no fences to keep you on the path. If you don't create some sort of organization for yourself, its very easy to get lost as things
    get complicated. Tossing everything into one giant bucket will have you pulling your hair out.

Maybe you are looking for