Freeview Test Card

Ok, here's a simple question of no real importance. Why can't I view the Freeview test card on my BT Vision classic GUI black box?
"Test card? Has he been taking drugs?" ... I hear you ask.
Firstly you might want to try the following directly on a Freeview TV first so you know how to get it to work. I don't know if it works on all Freeview TV's but certainly does on my Panasonic. 
(1)  Go to the BBC Red Button channel on 200. (Press 2, 0, 0 (and ok or enter if necessary)).
(2)  Wait for the background text to appear.
(3)  Press the YELLOW button within 30 seconds.
(4)  Switch to another channel (e.g. Press 1 (and ok or enter if necessary)).
(5)  Go back to the BBC Red Button channel on 200. (Press 2, 0, 0 (and ok or enter if necessary)).
(6)  Wait for the background text to appear.
(7)  Press the GREEN button within 30 seconds.
(8)  A status page should be displayed.
(9)  As mentioned at the bottom of the status page, press GREEN to display the test card.
(10)  Take a stiff drink after being spooked out by that clown thing.
Ok, now back to my original question. When I try this on my BT Vision box I can go through steps (1) to (8), but step (9) just results in a blank screen. The other alternative of BLUE for credits does work ok.

I've got similar instructions based on the defunct channel 105 and have been looking unsuccessfully for an update. Well done umpire!
Any idea how to get shot of the card without turning the telly off?
Sorry I can't help with your question. 
You can click the white star next to this message if you think it was helpful.

Similar Messages

  • Where is the best place to obtain US test cards so we can evaluate Apple Pay for UK in store retail?

    We are in the process of evaluating whether Apple Pay is a viable payment option which we can offer our customer base in the UK.  As it is yet to arrive here in the UK we would be attempting a POC with US (apply pay friendly) test cards.  I imagine there are a few retailers doing the same, does anyone know where the best place to get suitable test cards?
    Regards
    Kevin

    You would probably have to contact your POS supplier. This is a user to user support forum and I doubt anyone would have that information here.
    FWIW, I have used Apple Pay on the contactless  POS terminals in London taxis, with my US issued credit cards. It works.

  • CS4 with Quadro FX 1700 512MB (Tested Video Cards?)

    After seeing a topic posted here with tested video cards, I went to the link to confirm my card was indeed supported and it is on the list of tested cards. http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=kb405711&sliceId=1
    I only installed this card yesterday, replacing my GEForce 9800GT and last night when working with Photoshop certain things were incredibly slow, I was working with the sliders in Selective Color and there was a massive delay when I dragged a slider so much so that is was virtually unusable. So I went into Photoshops preferences and disabled the Open GL Drawing and immediately Photoshop was responsive again.
    This begs the question why the performance got so bad with Open Gl turned on with a card that Adobe has tested? Could it be a driver? Could it be a setting on the Driver? I do have the latest driver from PNY, I am running the card under Vista 64, could it be the 64bit OS?
    Any insight would be most welcome.

    Hi Chris
    Sorry for my belated reply and thanks for offering to look into this.
    Here's my full specs:
    Intel DX58SO motherboard
    Intel Core i7 965 Extreme (Thermalrite Ultra-120 Extreme Cooler)
    Kingston DDR-3 6 GB
    4 x Seagate Sata-2 1TB drives
    OS: Windows Vista 64
    PNY Quadro FX1700
    I've tried various drivers on the video card and for only one day I was able to run Photoshop with OpenGL turned on, a day later it went all sluggish again and nothing changed in my system from the one day to the next.
    I've also played with settings (application specific) on the video card driver but it does not seem to improve anything either.
    Is there a way to completely and utterly remove the video drivers so I can reload them fresh? Vista always seems to hide copies of these things even though you do full uninstalls of them.

  • Airport card is not recognized by G3 iMac

    I recently acquired a G3 600 MHz iMac, running OS X 10.4.11, and I want to join the iMac to my wireless network. So I purchased an Airport card ( tested card on a ibook running 10.4.11 and it works fine.) and seated it in the G3 iMac. For some reason the iMac does not recognize it one bit. I checked profiler and System Preferences and no sign of an Airport Card. I then opened the iMac and reseated the card, I even changed out the adapter with another adapter I had. After researching online, some people suggested an archival OS restore. Although I would try that but unfortunately I do not have any of the original install disks. So my question is: does anyone know how I can make the os recognize the card?
    Greatly appreciate the help.

    There are two versions of the original AirPort card, and their identify can be determined using the information below.
    The poster you replied to may be referring to this post quoted below, though even if he had the initially issued card, it would not explain why the card is not recognized. Though incapable of supporting advanced security, it would otherwise be recognized and operate as expected if seated properly, as you have described.
    The original AirPort card was equivalent to a WaveLAN Silver card, and supported only 40-bit WEP or 64-bit encryption, and did not support WPA.
    The original AirPort Base Station which shipped with these cards on board was limited to 10 clients, had only a 10BbaseT LAN port, and supported only 40-bit WEP. Later cards which looked physically identical, supported 104 bit WEP, or 128-bit encryption, as did the AirPort Base Stations which included them. This second card, also manufactured initially in the Netherlands for Apple by AT&T's Lucent unit—later know as ORiNOCO—was equivalent to the WaveLAN Gold card.
    The 661-2219 part number is distinguished by the M7600LL/* marketing designator screened on the label, as well as engineering revision part number 825-4889 and worldwide procurement part number 630-2883. EEE code G3G is embedded right-most in the last four characters of each part's serial number. *This character is typically A, B or C.
    The 661-2569, on the other hand, is distinguished by an M7600LL/D or later marketing designator, engineering revision part number 825-5620, the same worldwide procurement part number 630-2883 and typically the phrase '128 bits' along the lower center of the label. EEE codes LH8, M6Y or QAC are embedded right-most in the last four characters of each part's serial number.
    While a procurement number generally changes when a service part number change is made, this product did not, as Lucent remained its sole supplier, the 'change' to the card involved different firmware and not a physical change to the product, and Apple personnel largely considered them equivalent, though they were and are not.
    Graphite AirPort base station models initially used the M7600LL/A, B or C cards, and was itself designated the M7601LL/A and later, the M7601LL/B. Both base stations were also designated as 661-2265 whole unit service replacement parts. Every card we've ever seen in a Graphite base station was a 661-2219 and was marked as described above.
    Apple did not adequately document many of these parts and there applications at the time they were still in use, and all have disappeared from their inventory—except in limited cases—as has much of what existed for documentation. Given their personnel changes over the years, it's quite likely that no one there now can recall the subtle differences or properly identify these products. Once there are designated vintage, then obsolete, they drop quickly off of the radar.
    While any properly functioning iMac compatible AirPort card properly mounted in a 076-0804 adapter would show up in the System Profiler without the antenna connected, the performance of such a card would be poor to abysmal.
    I believe that you are completely correct when you indicate that either the adapter is not seated properly, that it is not working properly, or that the logic board is defective. The latter two scenarios are quite unlikely, though possible.

  • Qosmio F30 PQF32E- WI-FI card issue

    Dera all,
    A long time i am using wi-fi connection for connecting internet. Yesterday i tried to connect wi-fi, i got error. When I am activating wi-fi in notebook, it is getting frozen or working very very slow and even wi-fi card disabled. i am enabling card it show connection failed, can enable. I downloaded latest version for wi-fi card driver, no result same type error. i did already format and re-install system with original Toshiba DVD. Same error, wi-fi not working. Does it means that my wi-fi card is out service? How to test card ? if it is out of service what can i do? how can change my card in my notebook? From where to order?
    WiFI card model - Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
    Also when i am trying to see my ip in Command prompt(CMD) i get this notification...
    Windows IP Configuration
    An internal error occurred: A device attached to the system is not functioning.
    Please contact Microsoft Product Support Services for further help.
    Additional information: Unknown media status code.
    Thanks in advance

    HI!,
    I have already updated BIOS (currently version is 3.90-WIN) also re-installed and installed latest driver of WLAN. Same result! It seems my WLAN card is out of service. I have take off wlan card and put it again it place, i observer that cart getting hot, after that i understand that WLAN card is out of service.... So i have ordered WLAN card. Hope after chaning my Wlan card, everything will works like before!
    So it is very interesting for me why card in short period became out of service? what can be reason for that? which factor?
    Thanx

  • Where is the list of supported video cards?

    CS5 trial is unbearably slow unless I disable openGL.
    Even when disabled, my menus are corrupt and windows "behind" photoshop are showing through.
    Is there any way to completely disable video acceleration (CS3 works fine on this machine)?  If not, what card will work?

    GPU doc:
    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/404/kb404898.html
    Tested cards:
    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/831/cpsid_83117.html

  • FICO scores with 1 vs 2 cards out of 9 with balance

    I got a little sloppy with my balances and accidentally had a second report (while in mortgage process, for shame I know) and decided to spend $41 in the name of "science" since we've been debating this for longer than I've been on the forums at any rate. 5/24: 1/9 cards with balance.  $43/1000 individual balance, $43/34600 aggregate balance (and a Zync in a Pear Tree) 5/29: 2/9 cards with balance.  $43/1000 and $86/8400 individual balances, $129/34600 aggregate balance (same Zync at $0 discounted from limit) Data speaks for itself, am a little surprised personally by the findings but if we trust the 3B scores as reference, well... I'd seen this played out on FICO 8 with my balance fun over time though not rigorously tracked, but here's two point in time snapshots over the entire suite of scores we have access to on MF. Disclosure: I have a dirty file still, clean file may not exhibit same behavior on the anecdotal evidence that every little hiccup counts for comparitively more if you're gold-plated.  Also the scores are listed as they are in the MF additional scores interface, if a translation is needed to the bureau name for it, that can be provided. Score24-May29-MayEQ 8690690EQ 5700700EQ Auto 8701701EQ Auto 5697697EQ Bank 8705705EQ Bank 5721721   TU 8706706TU 4731731TU Auto 8728728TU Auto 4746746TU Bank 8723723TU Bank 4745740   EX 8712712EX 2725725EX Auto 8717717EX Auto 2741741EX Bank 8726726EX Bank 3697697EX Bank 2739739

    StartingOver10 wrote:
    Revelate wrote:
    jamie123 wrote:
    About 5 months ago I had my scores all nice and groomed. One card was reporting 5% of its CL all others $0. Then I screwed up and bought a $2.99 app on my cell phone and forgot it was charged to one of my $0 cards. The card reported a $3 balance and I lost 3 points. So for me, $3 on a second card equals 3 points! That's why I tested this time with a relatively high balance card reporting. I wanted to see what worse case scenario would do. So I had one card at 5% of its CL and the "test" card reporting at 71% of its CL (Still 5% total UTI) and I lost 6 points.Hmm, didn't see a breakpoint at 73% when I tested it once, but I'm really leaning towards getting the silly SDFCU secured minimum limit card and see if I can try to isolate individual balance scoring with an otherwise pristine report. Depending how much furniture I wind up financing  Wonder what it says when you get an offer accepted on a new place, and you're looking around your current domicile thinking: I'm not moving any of this junk.  Part of it I know I bought as throw away junk several years ago but realized when I was doing a quote for home owners insurance, if I'm not counting it for dollar value in the total loss scenario, probably not worth keeping heh.I am laughing....I moved in Feb 2015 and did the exact same thing.  Looked around and said - Hey, I'll just get some new furniture rather than moving the old stuff! That's how $16k ended up on my cc's for a few months (Mar was first month, will be paid off by Aug) but I tanked my scores.... And FWIW it doesn't save as much time as you think it will save. But it is nice to have a new place with new decor I'm sure you will love getting yours together...I wasn't worried about the time so much (I really haven't got much, I'm usually pretty good at cleaning out detritus from my life), was just more if I don't care about it, I should buy something I do care about.  I have been living in the bottom floor of a dark, rare does it get natural sunlight apartment.  Just realized looking around when doing the homeowners insurance I fell into building around a couple of random furniture pieces I picked up and there's a lot of dark tones everywhere... and I absolutely don't need to take that with me.  Actually it would feel wrong in the new place. One of the things I really liked in the condo was top floor and a lot of natural light, so I'm thinking unless I bought it to keep forever (bed, entertainment pieces) just give it away to the other apartment denizens and fill the new place with lighter "happier" tones.  I don't even need my portable air conditioner hah, the other side of the hill by the Pacific doesn't get the temperature spikes nearly as much and I doubt the new place holds heat appreciably. So yeah, new place after 10 years, psychologically it's worth spending the money for a clean start. Really isn't that much, I need a table and chairs, a couch, and something to sit the TV on and entertainment stuff into.  Realistically that's maybe like 10K max if I go 1st/2nd tier on the high but-not-absurd end and spending more than that... I'm doing something really wrong, plus if I pick well this goes under the keep forever or until it breaks category I buy the stuff I care about under under typical amortization-style math.  Everything else, pictures, painting knockoffs, plants, can be added later, and figure if I ever do get to the theoretical wife she'll almost assuredly have a much stronger opinion than mine and I don't really care about decor so she can do it all other than I get a veto of a depressing color tone . It'll also be an interesting test, other than my installment loans I've never been in debt previously, not once, anywhere in my life.  Floating some credit card debt on Cap 1 / Discover 0% promos, I sort of want to see how I react to it emotionally.  Rationally I know it makes sense but hard to say how I'll feel about it seeing the balances and not PIFing them off.  Better to know that now, even if it's not 1:1 to the conserving cash because of financial stress scenario, it is a change which wouldn't want to be surprised by if the fecal matter ever does hit the air circulation device.  

  • VTX3D AMD Radeon HD 7870 Tahiti LE Graphics Card + MSI 990XA-GD55 - motherboard

    Hi,
       Just trying to do a build, got the computer running with a old graphics card but when I put in the Radeon 7870 card no signal is sent, the card fan spins so guess its fully powered, just took battery out to refresh CMOS so will try again after a hour, have read some comments on flashing the BIOS can sometimes cure it, the board version is MS7640 v4.0 , so guess thats the 7640vM4.zip update? Tia

    Board: 990XA-GD55
    Bios: Version 22.1
    VGA:   NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS( dug a old one out for testing and works fine)    VTX3D AMD Radeon HD 7870 Tahiti LE Graphics Card ( is what I'm trying to run)
    PSU:   Master G-Series G600W 80+  Single +12V rail
    3.60 gigahertz AMD FX-4100 Quad-Core
    MEM: Corsair 1600mhz 6gb  cmx6gx3m3a1600c9  x 2
             Cosair 1333mhz 8gb    cmx8gx3m2a1333c9 x 2
             g.skill rip 1600 8gb       f3-12800cl8d-8gbxm x 2
    OS: Windows 7 64bit Professional
    Sorry for slow reply, been tied up with other things. Have 4 slots for ram , have had 4 used up with just corsair , same in each coloured slots and just 1 stick for testing , all works fine on old testing card, the 7870 still ain't being picked up from when the PC is first turned on. Please don't tell me card is duff..... :/

  • Two versions of original Airport card?

    I have only today learned that the original Airport card came in two versions: 661-2219, which does not have the capability of accessing a WPA-protected router, and 661-2549, which does. My question is, how do you distinguish between these two cards, visibly or otherwise?

    It was not 'suddenly discovered,' as we have made this claim for many years. I don't understand how it is inconsistent with what you insist to be the case, as…
    • we refer only to the A/B revisions—which you agree do not support WEP beyond 40 bits—to be incapable of supporting WPA, as they shipped from the factory
    • we sell such cards with the lower level of capability for use in pre-OS X 10.3 installations with the clear caveat that such cards, as sold, don't support WPA or—if you will—are not guaranteed to, and should be expected to, support WPA
    It's not in our financial interest to apply firmware to the older cards which we periodically encounter and we don't claim that it has been done, as we don't test each card specifically for such capabilities. Why bother to, when they are sold indicating that they do not support WPA? We don't speak for others in the industry, only for ourselves. And, we attempt to convey simple, accurate information. In this case, we think we achieve that in a way that lowers what might otherwise be heightened user expectations and avoid unintended outcomes.
    Since the higher cost cards are priced at a level consistently at or lower than most vendors and carry a one-year warranty, and the less capable early cards are discounted from that level yet carry the same warranty, we think that they pair offer better overall value to most users under most circumstances. That said, they can be less expensive—or, more expensive—than some unsupported product sold on eBay. But, ours are tested and warranted, and the price has remained consistent across low and high availability situations, something that we again believe provides better overall value to buyers.
    Sure, they might—in fact—support it, in some circumstances. But, we would be inundated with complaints from users wanting such support if the individual card they purchased did not support it when they received that specific card. While Apple claims that the original AirPort base station never supported WPA, you need only put a WPA capable replacement card in it and use the appropriate software to gain access to this feature. Components other than the card itself in an AirPort base station can be reasonably characterized as passive. It is the card itself that determines the capabilities of the base station.
    We're currently out of the original cards, or I would arrange to ship you one of each to test in your own environment to satisfy your concerns. In our case, testing cards at one point for such capabilities reasonably satisfied us that M7600LL/A and B cards did not support WPA 'out of the box' and so we've simply pointed that out.
    It's akin to saying that original iMacs based upon a G3 processor do not support the installation of Mac OS X, unless and until a suitable firmware update is applied. And that statement also is true, given that most shipped pre-OS X and without the installed firmware.
    How do I put this? Most alternative suppliers in this industry are chumps: they know little, and care even less. It's all about 'turn and burn' to them, and they seek almost exclusively to maximize their opportunity. Despite their claims, they could care less about customers. You only have to look around the web to figure that out…
    We've been quietly engaged in this market in the background for nearly twenty years, so we know a thing or two about the other players.
    We find it too cumbersome to explain the capabilities of the original AirPort cards in general beyond what we describe, and not economical to upgrade the firmware of such cards and attempt to sell them as the second generation of that product line, thereby creating an instantaneous identification conflict.
    When we receive and qualify additional cards, I will get ahold of you in The Lounge if you are interested in setting up a 'lab test' on your own premises, or modifying the A or B card by applying a firmware update.
    To some degree, the argument is moot: Apple no longer supports the original card at all, and the second generation of the product line remains supported only in California, and only for a limited remaining time period.

  • Good capture cards for Mac?

    Does anyone know of capture cards for Mac that work well for FMLE?
    The list of tested cards in the Device Compatability Matrix only appear to be for Windows.
    I see discussions about the Blackmagic cards, for example, that indicate those have problems in many situations.
    Any tips are much appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Sage

    Thanks! And the Canopus ADVC 110 is also external via firewire, which is
    even better.
    Cheers,
    -sage

  • CS6 Macintosh RAM, Video Card, Scratch Disk?

    I upgraded to the CS6 Master Collection in December and just installed it a couple days ago. I must say I love the new tiling options!
    I am running the software, mostly Photoshop and Illustrator, on a 2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon Mac Pro running 10.7.5. I am looking to improve processing times as I am starting to work with bigger images for graphics work, which are usually 75-100MB, but with some of them reaching the 200-300MB range.
    I have some questions regarding computer upgrades:
    1. Increasing the current 16GB of memory to the maximum of 16GB would run about $557.00:
    a. Would I see much of a speed increase when using PS or Illustrator to work on a single file given the file sizes?
    b. Would there be much of a benefit in speed when using both at the same time; for example, while waiting for Illustrator to process a large image I work on another image in PS.
    2. Given the amount of RAM does a seperate scratch disk provide any benefit? I've used them on PowerPc Macs, but those only had 2GB RAM and a lot slower graphics cards.
    3. Would there be much of speed increase by upgrading the graphics card from the current ATI Radeon HD 5770 to a ATI Radeon HD 5880? That would likely be the only card I'd ever upgrade to as it has the same basic monitor connectors as the 5770. The 5780 would run about $480.
    4. I recently exported a AI file as a png file. If you examine the file's details using the Macintosh menu item "File: Get Info" it indicated that the file was 46,666 x 46,666 pixels with a size of 67.6MB, yet when I attempted to open it in PS I received a out of memory error even though PS indicated that there was over 15GB of memory available. The file would VERY slowly open in Macintosh's default Preview application so I don't think the file was corrupt.

    Thanks for the information.
    1. Sorry,  should have stated 16GB to 48GB.
    2-3. Did some further research on gpu and related items and I see that Illustrator depends upon RAM and a scratch disk while PS utlizes these plus the GPU. So upgrading the graphics card could benefit PS, especially if its listed upon the listed on tested cards:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/979969
    4. I think have may detected a bad RAM card in slot #2 so this may be the cause.
    I'll think I'll max the ram and install a scratch HD for now.

  • Nvidia GTX 400 cards and CS5 (GTX285 is no longer current)

    Given that NVidia has now released the GTX470 and GTX480 cards, is it reasonable to assume they will work well with Premiere Pro CS5?  The GTX285 is outdated at this point and not really worth purchasing when compared to the GTX470.
    Does the new Mercury engine run pretty much on any of the newer Nvidia cards, with only the 285 mentioned because of lack of time to test all permutations?  I can't imagine it wouldn't run on a GTX470 or GTX 260 system for example, since the drivers are the same for most of the newer Nvidia cards.
    -Roger Uzun
    [email protected]

    there is a simple text file inside the PREMIERE program directory which LISTS graphics card that can be used with MERCURY all you need to do is edit this list to include the card you want to use.
    Providing your graphics card has at least 1gb and it is enabled to use CUDA the Mercury engine can be HARDWARE enabled by simple editing of this file
    c:program files\adobe\adobe premiere pro cs5\cuda_supported_cards.txt
    there is also a program which SNIFFS out which graphic card you have this is
    c:program files\adobe\adobe premiere pro\ cs5gpusniffer.exe
    just use this program and note carefully how the name of your card is listed then add this name EXACTLY as it appears to
    c:program files\adobe\adobe premiere pro cs5\cuda_supported_cards.txt the easy solution is to CUT and PASTE the name
    IF YOU UPDATE Premiere at any time then it automatically overwrites cuda_supported_cards.txt to its original state so you will then need to manually enter your graphic card name again inside this simple text file.
    I am running MERCURY HARDWARE ENABLED RENDERING using a humble 9800gt nVidia card but you need to realize that not all cards which run will give you 100% compatibility with all the filters and effects which Premiere can apply ...probably Adobe have severely limited the list to cards which have been extensively tested...
    hope this is helpful to you....in reality a fairly broad range of CUDA enabled nVidia cards CAN be used with Mercury Hardware enabled.
    In a nutshell  make sure your nVidia card has been CUDA enabled by running CUDA installation software then edit cuda_supported_cards.txt which in a WIN7 installation is found in c:program files\adobe\adobe premiere pro cs5\ if your are running another operating system then it might be located in a slightly different place but you can always do a search..........these details also apply to a SNOW LEOPARD system but obviously these files cs5gpusniffer.exe
    and cuda_supported_cards.txt
    providing your card is on the list in cuda_supported_cards.txt and it has at least 1gb ram then it should work OK
    Adobe are simply being very cautious with regard to thoroughly testing cards before they list them as compatible.

  • How to (unit) test JavaCards?

    Hi @all,
    what tool do you use to test cards?
    (I mean the classic expected vs. actual tests)
    Is it possible to test within JCShell?
    There is a command /test-suite, but I have now idea how to use it (and the manpage does not help alot)
    Cheers,
    Max

    If you want automated tests, you can have a JUnit test suite that can communicate with either a real card or your simulator of choice and send your APDU's to the card. You can build up the test framework to the point where you can exercise all the expected behaviour of your applets. You can assert the actual response from the card against an expected raw result, or you can decode the data you get back and check that. It is quite flexible but it can be a lot of work to get the framework setup.
    Cheers,
    Shane

  • Best graphics card for Photoshop CC and CS6

    It's been crazy trying to find help on which graphic card I should use for image editing in Photoshop CC and CS6.
    Can anyone recommend a graphic card?  I was told NVIDIA works great. BUT WHICH ONE?
    Frustrated.
    Thanks in advance for your advice.
    Ron Atchley

    Here you find tested cards.
    Photoshop CC and CC 2014 GPU FAQ

  • T60/T61: Which BIOS diagnostic card?

    Hi,
    which BIOS diagnostic card works in a T60 or T61? I've got a broken T60, which still beeps when RAM is removed, so
    I guess the BIOS isn't corrupt. I've tried a miniPCIe card, but it doesn't display any POST code. Will a parallel port card
    work, either on the Ultrabay Slim adapter or the port of a docking station or do I have to connec to the LPC bus directly to sniff port 80h accesses?
    Thanks,
    jal66

    As far as I know, none work in the T60.
    I use one of these on T61 and newer:
    http://cgi.ebay.com/POST-CODE-Diagnostic-Test-Card​-Repair-IBM-Notebook-/310316355904?pt=LH_DefaultDo​...

Maybe you are looking for