FreeWRL: lesstif - openmotif conflict

I need to install a simple software to view x3d files. FreeWRL fits my needs.
The problem is that one of its dependencies (lesstif) conflicts with openmotif which I can't remove because I need for other applications.
Any suggestion?
Thank you!

Try pulling the xpdf PKGBUILD from ABS and building it with openmotif. It should be as simple as installing openmotif and replacing 'lesstif' with 'openmotif' in the xpdf depends.

Similar Messages

Made some packages that hopefully somebody could use

I have recently created updated versions of mozilla, opera and openMotif. I was wondering if I could upload my mozilla 1.7.11 pkg, opera 8.50 pkg and openMotif for opera so that opera does not give errors when starting. The user has to remove lesstif and then install openMotif so that opera 8.50 does not complain about missing library libXm.so.3. If anybody has any suggestions as to where I should upload said packages then I will be happy to do so. My only problem is I have not added my name and email address in the PKGBUILD for packages I have updated recently. I do not know I if I should give myself credit in the PKGBUILD because I am not the original package builder (architect) for the packages that I have updated. Suggestions would be welcome as to what I should do regarding upgrading packages that have already been created.

Thank you both for your replies. I have not read enough about the user repositories and aur requirements. I will try to find some time in the near future to read more about uploading packages into the user repository.
I would like to thank sh_ for his suggestion about linking the library libXm.so.2.0.1 to libXm.so.3, but however I could not find the library libXm when I had lesstif installed. It could have been I was tired from a long day of work. I found a pkgbuild by another user for openMotif and modified the pkgbuild so that I could install openMotif for opera. However openMotif conflicts with lesstif, so I recommend if one wants to use openMotif then it is best to remove lesstif. I am however open to hear if it is possible to have both libraries installed at the same time.

[new] openMotif

Sorry, someone in my office was going to replace Arch with Red Hat to get motif, so I had to make this PKBUILD for openMotif.
It does brake the convention as it has an upper case character in the package name butr I did that to get the package to download.
It does seem to work, as in I installed it and ran a couple of demo programs, though help could not be found.
Here is the simple package build if any one wants to test it:
#PKBUILD by Benedict White of CSE mostly an edited version of the lesstif PKGBUILD
pkgname=openMotif
pkgver=2.2.3
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="Open Motif"
depends=('x-server')
conflicts=(lesstif)
source=(http://www.motifzone.com/$pkgname/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz)
md5sums=('94c96a0f94ee0d5e41d3dba2188b263d')
build() {
cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
./configure --prefix=/usr
make || return 1
make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg install
# clean-up
rm -rf $startdir/pkg/usr/LessTif
rm -f $startdir/pkg/usr/lib/X11/mwm/README
# conflicts with Shell from perl
rm -f $startdir/pkg/usr/man/man3/Shell.3
# conflicts with tcl
rm -f $startdir/pkg/usr/man/man3/Object.3

Sorry, the source line is wrong, I just munged it together offline to get it to build with a pre downloaded package.
It should read:
source=(ftp://ftp.ics.com/pub/Products/Motif/om2.2.3/src/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz)
Which makes the PKBUILD look like this:
#PKBUILD by Benedict White of CSE mostly an edited version of the lesstif PKGBUILD
pkgname=openMotif
pkgver=2.2.3
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="Open Motif"
depends=('x-server')
source=(ftp://ftp.ics.com/pub/Products/Motif/om2.2.3/src/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz)
conflicts=(lesstif)
md5sums=('94c96a0f94ee0d5e41d3dba2188b263d')
build() {
cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
./configure --prefix=/usr
make || return 1
make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg install
# clean-up
rm -rf $startdir/pkg/usr/LessTif
rm -f $startdir/pkg/usr/lib/X11/mwm/README
# conflicts with Shell from perl
rm -f $startdir/pkg/usr/man/man3/Shell.3
# conflicts with tcl
rm -f $startdir/pkg/usr/man/man3/Object.3

Make openmotif the standard Motif library

Hello world!
I would like to suggest to replace lesstif by openmotif.
Openmotif is now under LGPL and (unlike lesstif) _alive_.
Furthermore lesstif programs are broken under Gnome3/mutter.
Problem:
* Run any program using lesstif under Gnome3/mutter (e.g. DDD)
* Click "File"
* Click "Edit"
* Result: "File" menu will not close and "Edit" menu items are displayed at
the wrong place.
* Programs using openmotif having proper menu behaviour
I successfully built and tested the current Arch packages of DDD, xpdf & nedit
by using openmotif 2.3.4 from community (other pkgs were not tested).
Currently the following packages require lesstif:
ddd, fbida, freewrl, grace, nedit, vtk, xlockmore, xpdf
Any chance the switch might happen?

karol wrote:
init0 wrote:Sorry, I'm not on that mailing list. Can someone hint Sergej Pupykin that at least one user is in favor of this move!
Done: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail … 20715.html
Thanks!

[Solved] Conflict upgrading

I'm trying to upgrade the system with
pacman -Syu
There are some errors:
:: lesstif and openmotif are in conflict. Remove openmotif? [y/N]
error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
:: lesstif and openmotif are in conflict
I have to keep openmotif, how can I find what needs lesstif?
Thanks for any reply!
Last edited by mghis (2011-04-09 15:10:50)

Dogmeat wrote:
He doesn't have lesstif installed so it is
pacman -Sii lesstif | grep Required
Haha, you got me there. Never knew -Sii, thank you.
<offtopic>
man pacman wrote:Passing two --info or -i flags will also display those packages in all repositories that depend on this package.
should have been:
Pass this option twice to also display those packages in all repositories that depend on this package.
as with "Passing two --refresh or -y flags will"...
</offtopic>

Crystal Report 2008 SP3 and BO XI 3.1 conflict

Hi every body,
We have a BOE system:
BO XI 3.1
Oracle db 10g
All running successful and can create some types of WebI report.
But we also want reports with Crystal Report.
1> So we install Crystal Report 2008 SP3 (without knowing the conflict error between BO XI 3.1 and Crystal Report 2008 SP3 and overwrite some .dll file). After installing, we can not create WebI report any more. And a error message box display: "DBDriver failed to load: C:\Program File\Business Objects\BusinessObjects ENterprise12.0\win32_x86\dataAccess\connectionServer\dbd_oci.dll ".
2> We uninstall Crystal Report SP3. But this is not the solution. Still error because of missing .dll files.
3> We open BO XI 3.1 setup and repair BO XI 3.1. Even we uninstall BO XI 3.1, delete all of its components and delete in regedit key. We install BO XI 3.1 again. Now we have full .dll file, not missing them any more. But when we open universe and click on Table browser, cannot fetching any tables.
We set rights for Oracle DB user again. But still error: cannot fetching.
4> We searched the solution for this problem on the internet. But not worked, no answer.
Can somebody help me bring back the BOE system state again ? pls :"<
T______T

Hi Paul,
I hope I read your question right!
Yes, It is possible to run XIR2 and 3.1 on the same server although it's not recommended by BO. You will need to make sure they are both pointing to different CMS databases and different FRS repositories, like you already mentioned you will need to specify different ports for the CMS db and Tomcat.
Why not uninstall Business Objects XI R2 in your BO development environment or a spare server (if you have one), and do a clean install of XI 3.1 SP3.
Tip: If you were already having performance issues with your XI R2 environment, I would seriously consider upgrading the hardware. XI 3.1 needs a bit more RAM and CPU than XI R2
Regards
Rim Geurts

OIM 9.1.0.2 - User group permission conflict issue

Hi Gurus,
IHAC who have faced a strange behavior about permission conflict.
User has been assigned to a user group (ANALISTA DRSI) who have permission to disable resource of the users he administrates. The user group has been assigned to resource's administrator.
The same use has been assigned to other user group (ANALISTA ADM DRSI) who have other permission. The user group has been not assigned to resource's administrator.
If the user has been only assigned to ANALISTA DRSI user group the user is able to see records on Rogue Account report. If the customer has been assigned to both ANALISTA DRSI and ANALISTA ADM the user is not able to see the record on Rogue Account report. He got a display error message (You do not have permission). Both user groups have the Report menu item assigned.
My question: if the customer is assigned to a user group who have permission to see the reports, should not the user is able to see the report even though he is also into the other group who do not have permission?
Is there conflit in the OIM???
Any tip will be very appreciated.

Orgnaization > Manage > Select Org in which users are getting created > Administrative Group (Drop Down) > Select Group for which users are not coming.

I have a macbook 4.1 with osx10.6.8 and just added memory (2gig) so I could sync my new Ipome and Ipad. and Ipad. Now I'm told I need to upgrade my operating system. The apple store gave me conflicting instructions. Any suggestions? Thanks

I have a macbook 4.1 with osx10.6.8 and just added memory (2gig) so I could sync my new IPhone and Ipad. Now I'm told at the apple store that I need to upgrade my operationg system. They said they couldn't help and gave me conflicting advice about what to do. Any ideas? Thanks you!

There are three models of MacBook that comprise the 'macbook 4.1' category, and each of them a little different; however other than 'macbook 4.1' the other thing they have in common is they all are considered Early 2008. Two are white, one black, polycarbonate case, Core2Duo 2.1GHz, 2.4GHz white, 2.4GHz black.
So if you can determine which one, if any of these, is the model build year and spec you have, that would be handy. Did you tell whoever you spoke to the serial number of your computer, so they'd know by looking up the specs to see what the supported maximum RAM upgrade capacity was, and other minimum requirements to make any upgrade to Mac OS X 10.6.8 at all?
If you have the serial number you can do a lookup to 'indentify by serial number' online, and use that information to determine if the computer needs even more RAM to take it past the minimum for Snow Leopard 10.6.8 and then get it ready to upgrade (via paid download from App Store, Snow Leopard gets you that far) and see what the next supported OS X full upgrade would be for the hardware limitations on that old MacBook.
If your MacBook IS a 4.1 build, the highest OS X it could run if it has the 2.4GHz cpu, is Lion 10.7.5. That would be an upgrade from the App store, available to OS X 10.6.8+ computers that access it online. And I kind of doubt how supported a newest iphone etc may be in lion.
everymac.com has a fair amount of information across many years of Apple computing hardware...
Here's the three MacBooks that share the 4.1 designation; first shipped with as much as 1GB RAM upgrade and the other two only a 2GB RAM*, (one white/one black color) according to this information...
• MacBook "Core 2 Duo" 2.1 13" (White-08) 2.1 GHz Core 2 Duo (T8100)
• MacBook "Core 2 Duo" 2.4 13" (White-08) 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo (T8300)
• MacBook "Core 2 Duo" 2.4 13" (Black-08) 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo (T8300)
...as seen here: http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook/index-macbook.html
*But according to MacTracker (free: download database) http://mactracker.ca
these MacBooks can use more RAM in aftermarket specs as much as:
Maximum Memory
6.0 GB (Actual) 4.0 GB (Apple)
Memory Slots
2 - 200-pin PC2-5300 (667MHz) DDR2 SO-DIMM
To get more information use a service such as this...
•identify by serial number:
http://www.powerbookmedic.com/identify-mac-serial.php
The Apple? store or whoever you talked, to may have been as accurate as they could be without further research. Could be you may have a newer or older MacBook, which would change whatever later OS X it could run past 10.6.8. And to go past Snow Leopard, you need to download the last bits for 10.6.x to be able to go and get any later upgrade. The ones that may let a newest iphone or ipad work with it, are past SL10.6.8
Anyway, as you further verify the model build year and configuration specifications, report back.
Good luck & happy computing!

CTE : ERRO MONITOR ( Type conflict in program /XNFE/SAPLGROUPING )

Ola Sap Experts, preciso de uma mão de vcs.
Estou em um ambiente de um cliente onde o monitor de outbound de CTe, quando se tenta acessar o detalhe da CTe ou qualquer outra ação é gerado o erro "Type conflict in program /XNFE/SAPLGROUPING. (termination; RABAX_STATE)" é gerado um dump na ST22.
O cliente nao tem qualquer customizacao desse monitor usa de maneira standart e se encontra no sp 16 do SLL-NFe rodando em base de um PI 7.31 dual stack.
Alguem já passou ou esta passando por isso ?

Prezados,
Alguém conseguiu resolver o DUMP?
Estamos enfrentando o mesmo problema no projeto, mas o erro só ocorre quando testamos um cenário com IPI Return.
Alguma dica?
Obrigada,
Tatiana Augusto

Can I Suppress Conflicting Names Messages in the TestStand Deployment Log?

I have a deployment that is being built via a command line calling the deployment utility. It is all being done with a script. I then use the deployment log for information to e-mail to myself and others about the build. I am getting conflicting name messages for VIs in the Labview Reports library that is shipped from NI. There are a lot of message about VIs being renamed because of this. Is there a way of suppressing these messages so real information can be observed and not missed because of all this spam? I don't want to have a real problem over looked because of these messages being generated about items that are not in my control. Thanks in advance for any help.
Troy

What version of TestStand, and LabVIEW are you using? Have you seen How to Successfully Deploy a TestStand System with LabVIEW 8.6 and Report Generation Toolkit ?
Richard S -- National Instruments --Applications Engineer -- Data Acquisition with TestStand

K7N2 DELTA ILSR has conflicted with ram....

K7N2 DELTA ILSR has conflicted with this ram....
http://www.kingmax.com/product/pro_superMPXB62D-383.htm
I got 2 * 256MB DDR 400 of the above ram.
Is there any conflicted with K7N2 DELTA??
amd 2500+
thank you
BIOS version 7.4

Quote
Originally posted by utada
I have already brought kingmax
These boards are very picky with RAM. As Bonz has pointed out their is an approved list near the top of the Forum but unfortunately I don't beleive Kingmax is on it. Sometimes the generic RAMS run, sometimes not. It seems to be hit or miss. If you want a recommendation of good quality RAM I would suggest MUSHKIN first and CORSAIR second. Good Luck
Rob

Hot Synch Manager Settings (Conflict Resolution)

Hello,
I synch an office desktop and a home desktop with one Palm Z22. I have had a lot of problems with duplicate appointments ! How should I configure the Hot Sync Manager settings? I have the conduits (calendar, note pad, etc. ) set on "synchonize the files". But when I click on "change" and then "settings", I'm brought to the option of "Conflict Resolution" and the choices are duplicate, Outlook wins, Handheld wins, or ignore. Which should I choose if I want to avoid duplicate appointments ?
Thank you.
Nancy
Post relates to: Zire
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Yes, that's what I'd set it to. You want the information to flow in only one direction on the slave computer. Handheld --> computer.
WyreNut
Post relates to: Centro (AT&T)
I am a Volunteer here, not employed by HP.
You too can become an HP Expert! Details HERE!
If my post has helped you, click the Kudos Thumbs up!
If it solved your issue, Click the "Accept as Solution" button so others can benefit from the question you asked!

Conflict resolution including the CRT DUMMYfor Add-On ST-SER rel.700_2007_1

Dear all,
Environment #    32 bit win2k3, SAP   & Orc with 10.2.0.2.0
We are in process of applying suport packs for Solution manager 7.0, SAPKITL25 is finished
When applying SAPKITL26 with SAPKB70015, SAPKA70015 I am gettign the following CRT is required
ST-SER rel.700_2007_1 .
I did this add-on & applied support packs for this component ST-SER rel.700_2007_1 - 1,2
& tried SAPKITL26 with SAPKB70015, SAPKA70015 again but the error repeats . What is the last support pack in 32 BIT sap system fo Solution manager.
Error -
Phase ADDON_CONFLICTS_?: Explanation of Errors
onflicts were found between the Support Packages that you want to
mport and the Add-Ons installed in the system. To guarantee the
onsistency of your system, the import is interrupted until all Conflict
esolution Transports (CRTs) for the listed Support Packages are
ncluded in the queue.
o include the CRTs in the queue, proceed as follows:
Write down the Support Packages and Add-Ons that have conflicts.
Leave this screen by choosing 'Cancel' (F12).
Load the CRTs for the Support Packages with conflicts from the SAP
Service Marketplace or request them from your Add-On supplier.
Define the extended queue again in the Support Package Manager.
Import the queue. The Support Package Manager executes all steps from
the beginning.
f the problem involves an SAP Add-On, see SAP Note 53902, which tells
ou which CRTs resolve the conflicts. Otherwise contact the supplier of
our Add-On for details on how to proceed.
he following contains a table of Support Packages for each Add-On for
hich conflicts were detected. The column 'Information on the Conflict
esolution' specifies how you can resolve a conflict. For more
nformation, select the corresponding 'Information for the Conflict
esolution'.
onflicts Between Add-On ST-SER 700_2007_1 and Support Packages
omponent    Release      Support Package        Information on
                                                Conflict Resolution
T           400          SAPKITL426             CRT: DUMMY
Is this a known error or how to overcome this & clues on the following..
-Rahul

Dear Sunny,
I went through the sap notes & found that i need to download ST-SER 700_2008_1.
SAP Solution Manager 7.0 (Software component ST 400)
ST 400 SP16 (SAPKITL426)
With SP16 (SAPKITL426) SAP strictly recommends to upgrade your ST-SER tothe release 700_2008_1 or higher. Therefore use transaction SAINT instead of transaction SPAM to patch your system to SAP Solution Manager 7.0. If you try to patch your system via SPAM and your ST-SER release is 700_2007_1 or less you will receive one of the following information within SPAM during phase ADDON_CONFLICTS_?:
                    a) Conflicts Between Add-On ST-SER 700_2005_2 and Support Packages SAPKITL426 Include CRT
                    b) Conflicts Between Add-On ST-SER 700_2006_1 and Support Packages SAPKITL426 Include CRT
                    c) Conflicts Between Add-On ST-SER 700_2006_2 and Support Packages SAPKITL426 Include CRT
                    c) Conflicts Between Add-On ST-SER 700_2007_1 and Support Packages SAPKITL426 Include CRT
                    *Please be aware there is no physical Conflict Resolution Transport (CRT) available to solve this conflict (it is not planned to provide such a CRT). You have to patch your system via SAINT not via SPAM:*
                    1. Delete your SPAM-QUEUE by pressing the Display/Define button within SPAM.
                    2. Download all ST-SER Delta-Upgrade packages from the Software Download Center into your EPS-Inbox.
                    3. Call transaction SAINT and press Start button.
                    4. Select ST-SER 700_2008_1 or higher and press Continue button
                    All neccessary component packages will automatically be included into a valid SAINT-queue
but ST-SER 700_2008_1 not available to download & also noticed there are no manual CRT's
how should i manage to patch system with ST-SER 700_2008_1 when it is not availble to download
Thanks & regards,
rahul

Conflict: READ TABLE itab2 INDEX 1 vs Modify itab1 from index sy-tabix

The below simple code is for each itab1 line, create a new itab2 by using select statement, and then grab the max value of field f in itab2 and fill it into a corresponding field in itab1.
However the statement:
READ TABLE itab2 into gs_itab1 INDEX 1.
causes the conflict with our another statement in the end of itab1 loop:
Modify itab1 from gs_itab1 index sy-tabix.
that the below Modify statement always modify itab1 at 1st row and also causes an unlimited loop that the program is hung up. Our code looks as the following:
Loop AT itab1 into gs_itab1.
         use Select statement to fill in itab2...
         SORT itab2 BY f DESCENDING. "f is a field of itab2
         READ TABLE itab2 into gs_itab1 INDEX 1.
         Modify itab1 from gs_itab1 index sy-tabix.
EndLoop.
However the last two lines of statements in the itab1 loop causes the program hang!
Any solution?
Thanks in advance!

Hi,
I got confused while going thru the code...
according to code
first u loop itab1 and get tht in gs_itab1 and then a select query to get data from some table and store in itab2.
Here are u using any where condition, if yes u may probably check aganst gs_itab1 rite? if yes
first suggestion...why cant u put the select statement above the loop and get all the values to an internal table and then read the internal table in the loop stmt. Yes i can see u r sorting it based on some 'f'..just a suggestion
Now here can u follow this code...
Loop AT itab1 ASSIGNING <fs_itab1>,
         use Select statement to fill in itab2...
         SORT itab2 BY f DESCENDING. "f is a field of itab2
         READ TABLE itab2 into <fs_itab1> index 1.
EndLoop.
Please let me know if its not ok
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Regards,
ABAPer007
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Apr 11, 2008 12:26 PM

Unable to create web app with PowerShell - An update conflict has occurred

I am trying to create a new Web Application using PowerShell. I need to use PowerShell because I need to create the Web App using classic authentication and not Claims authentication. the first time I created the Web App, everything went great. Ever since
the first time, I get an error and the web app creation does not complete. Just as an FYI, I can create a new Web App using Central Admin, but that creates it with Claims authentication which I cannot use.
Here is my PowerShell script
New-SPWebApplication -Name "SharePoint2013 (82)" -ApplicationPool "SharePoint2013-82" -AuthenticationMethod "NTLM" -ApplicationPoolAccount (Get-SPManagedAccount "GLOBAL\SP_AppPool") -Port 82 -URL "http://sharepoint2013"
Here is the error I get in PowerShell
New-SPWebApplication : An update conflict has occurred, and you must re-try this action. The object SPWebApplication
Name=SharePoint2013 (82) was updated by DOMAIN\SP_Administrator, in the powershell (13020) process, on machine SPWEB01.
View the tracing log for more information about the conflict.
At line:1 char:1
+ New-SPWebApplication -Name "SharePoint2013 (82)" -ApplicationPool "SharePoint201 ...
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidData: (Microsoft.Share...PWebApplication:SPCmdletNewSPWebApplication) [New-SPWebA
pplication], SPUpdatedConcurrencyException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : Microsoft.SharePoint.PowerShell.SPCmdletNewSPWebApplicationUnknown SQL Exception 547 occurred. Additional error information from SQL Server is included below.
The DELETE statement conflicted with the REFERENCE constraint "FK_Dependencies1_Objects". The conflict occurred in database "SP_Config", table "dbo.Dependencies", column 'ObjectId'.
The statement has been terminated.
I also get this error from the trace
Unknown SQL Exception 547 occurred. Additional error information from SQL Server is included below.
The DELETE statement conflicted with the REFERENCE constraint "FK_Dependencies1_Objects". The conflict occurred in database "SP_Config", table "dbo.Dependencies", column 'ObjectId'.
The statement has been terminated.
I have tried to resolve the issue by performing the following:
Delete the partially created web app using Central Admin or PowerShell
Clear the file system cache on all servers in the farm (Stopping wss timer job, Saving Copy of the
cache.ini file from C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\application data\Microsoft\SharePoint\Config folder. Clearing all the .xml files from the location except cache.ini but Edit the cache.ini to have value 1. Starting the timer job)
Use Products Configuration Wizard (no detach, just 'upgrade') - People have said to select the option to disconnect the server from server farm and revert back again at next step (so you actually do not disconnect), but there is no next step that I have
encountered. You select 'disconnect', hit next, and the server disconnects.
Restart all the servers in the farm
Run the PowerShell script again...still get the same error
I have tried it on multiple servers in the farm too.

Hi Michael,
I found a similar thread for you reference:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/9ccef7bf-87a9-4849-b086-4db2d898f1d7/cannot-create-new-web-application-wss-30?forum=sharepointadminlegacy
If it doesn’t work, sometimes the issue might be caused by long time keep powershell opening and generating some cache files. So please try re-opening the powershell and test the issue again.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ronalg/archive/2011/06/24/mount-spcontentdatabase-errors-on-2nd-and-subsequent-attempts-of-same-database.aspx?Redirected=true
http://www.oakwoodinsights.com/sharepoint-powershell-surprise/
In addition, here is an article which explains the possible reason of the SQL error:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee513056(v=office.14).aspx
Regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected] .
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

FreeWRL: lesstif - openmotif conflict

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for