Frustration i spell you i-P-O-D, problems with setting up video on my ipod.

hey everyone, i just upgraded from my ipod mini to these new ipod videos. i came home hooked it up, installed the newer itunes and registered the ipod but my videos were unable to be put on the ipod. i realized i had to download quicktime pro 7, which i did. i picked a few music videos to test it out which each took an eternity to convert, following the apple website instructions to a T. after waiting for what seemed like hours the videos were converted and able to be played on the ipod.. but there was no audio. how can i put my videos on my ipod with the original audio? this is incredibly frustrating!

I have also had problems getting video to copy onto my new iPod video. The only video I had any success with was, of course, those videos purchased from the iTMS (iTunes Music Store).
I have had success using a shareware program called: iSquint (http://www.isquint.org/). But this program will only convert existing QuickTime movies to an iPod compatible format - H.264 (.mp4).
Some of the videos I converted using iSquint were first ripped from DVD movies using a program called: DVDxDV (http://www.dvdxdv.com/DVDxDV.overview.htm). The problem is that with movies longer than 10 min. - the audio and video get out of sync with each other. Movies shorter than 10 min. seem to transfer just fine.
I found a shareware program called: Handbrake (http://handbrake.m0k.org/) that will rip movies directly from DVD to an iPod compatible format. But none of the movies I ripped from DVD would transfer to the iPod.
I studied the [extensive] tutorials found at the iPod Lounge (http://www.iLounge.com/) on ripping DVD movies to iPod compatible formats and I thought I did everything to the letter. But I haven’t been able to transfer any DVD movie ripped using the Handbrake method to the iPod.
Everything I'm doing seems to match up with Apple's requirements and the tutorial on: "Creating video for iPod" at:
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/tutorials/creatingvideo.html
One last note: Strangely, I can't get any video converted using QuickTime Pro 7.0.3 "export to iPod (320 x 240)" codec to transfer to iPod either. When I spoke to Apple Tech Support on this, I was told Apple doesn't support transferring video to the iPod using any method other than the iTMS. That doesn't make any sense. Why would they post a tutorial on creating video for iPod if they don't support it?
Has anyone had any success at getting movies ripped directly from DVD to an iPod compatible format that will actually play on their iPod? If so, please help...
Power Mac G4 MDD   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

Similar Messages

  • Is there a way to play video clips that use adobe flash and if not when are you going to resolve your problem with them ? I won't buy another apple product until you do and I Know I,m not the online.

    Is there a way to play video clips that use adobe flash and if not when are you going to resolve your problem with them ? I won't buy another apple product until you do and I Know I,m not the only one.

    Use the search feature and type in Flash and there are like thousands of posts on this.
    You seem to think you are addressing Apple with your post.  This is a user forum and we are all users just like you.

  • Can you help I was having problems with my iPod so I restored it but I accidentally set it up as a new iPod is there any way to restore it from an old  backup when I right click iPod in iTunes there isn't one anyway to recover one or find it on computer

    Hi can you help I was having problems with my iPod so I restored it but I
    accidentally set it up as a new iPod is there any way to restore it from an old
    backup when I right click iPod in iTunes there isn't one anyway to recover one
    or find it on computer

    The following says how to restore from backup.
    iOS: How to back up
    If you go to iTunes>Preferences>Devices you can see if you have an iTunes backup. You need one dated before or the exact time you started the restore.

  • Hey Apple when are you going to fix the problems with IOS 8.3??

    Hey Apple when are you going to fix the problems with IOS 8.3??
    Message is working weird.
    I don't have internet service when I'm away from my WiFi, because my phone won't use LTE now.
    Should I wait for a IOS 8.3.1 update or reset my phone to factory and start over?
    If there's a fix coming when will we see it?
    (I'm using iPhone6 plus)
    I've tried everything else to fix the problems I'm having. Soft restart. Hard restart. Used your chat line. Called Verizon. Reset network settings.... Help!!!!!
    I've posted on the Apple Communities about all this and I've sent in a couple of bug reports.
    I live up in the mountains and MUST be able to access my Verizon LTE for information if there is a fire! I'm in California!

    I have a Verizon iPhone 6 and am having none of those problems.
    SueMac wrote:
    Should I wait for a IOS 8.3.1 update or reset my phone to factory and start over?
    Didn't they already have you do that? If you haven't, yes, you should restore your phone as new and test.
    I live up in the mountains and MUST be able to access my Verizon LTE for information if there is a fire! I'm in California!
    If you are in a situation where you may need emergency information, organizations such as the Red Cross recommend things like this:
    http://www.amazon.com/Epica-Emergency-Digital-Flashlight-Certified/dp/B00CZDT30S /ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1429463666&sr=8-…

  • Hi guys, i just got my iPhone 4s and sometimes the signal is lost and i have to restart the phone in order to get reception again. do you thing there is a problem with the phone or with the carrier? thanks

    Hi guys, i just got my iPhone 4s and sometimes the signal is lost and i have to restart the phone in order to get reception again. do you thing there is a problem with the phone or with the carrier? thanks

    I have the exact same problem. Called my operator who told me it was a hardware issue and Apple is working on a fix...

  • When are you going to fix the problems with this iOs7 ????

    since I've downloaded iOs7 - everything is  a SLOW-MO!!!  And you can't scale your photos for wallpaper.. Totally disappointed with iOs7

    Mine's running real fast.  Thrilled with IOS-7.

  • I would like to ask you how to fix this problem with firefox 4 final version: I open one firefox browser window and i leave it then i open another new window of firefox and it opens not homepage but the last closed tab. Thank you in advance

    could you please help me with this because it makes me to choose other browser

    Many thanks for your reply, Waka – guess you're right that it's a new add on or bust... I still find it odd that such a common UI feature across mobile browsers is unavailable in FF24 either as an option under settings or as an add-on. Surely, I'm not the only person who finds this puzzling?

  • Can you restore an already setup iPhone with the back up of an iPod touch

    I got my iphone and set it up at the store. If i was to restore it and use an ipod touch back up to get the app data. Would it keep the number or would i have to reset it up

    Makes no difference.
    If you want or need to restore your iPhone with iTunes, the current iOS version will be reinstalled.
    If you want to transfer the backup for your iPod Touch to your iPhone, you must restore your iPhone with iTunes and when prompted, select restore from the backup for your iPod Touch as already provided.
    If there was another way, I would provide it.

  • How many of you are having these reported problems with the iPhone 5?

    I'm thinking of getting an iPhone 5 after the 11th, when my current iPhone 4 contract expires.
    With my luck with Apple products I'll probably get one with all the problems you read about:
    - light leaks,
    - bubbles on the screen,
    - yellow tints,
    - reversed volume buttons,
    - scratches out-of-the-box...
    How prevelant are these? Did your iPhone 5 have any of the above? Any other common problems?
    I would wait until things "settle down" but I only have a window of one month in which I can switch providers without penalty if I decide to do that (crazy Japan system).
    Thanks,
    doug

    My two new phones will arrive tomorrow, but honestly, I don't expect any issues, like with every other iOS based device I've bought.  Just remember that coming on these forums, is kind of like visiting a hospital and thinking that everyone on the planet must be sick.  The "gruntled" of this world are usually the loudest, while the usually very happy are nowhere to be seen or heard from.
    I have at least a dozen friends who have already gotten their new iPhone 5.  Not one of them has any issues.  None.  No light bleeding.  No scuffs (oh sure, you can scratch the new phone if you try, it is afterall cased in annodized aluminum - so use a case to keep it pristine), no reverse volume buttons (I hadn't even heard that one), no bubbles, well you get the idea.
    I suspect you can buy without fear and I'm sure you'll really be pleased you did.

  • Solve this and you're a genious: Port problems with SRW2016

    Equipment:
    One SRW2016 fresh out of the box and set to factory default settings
    One Dell Laptop running Windows XP
    One custom network appliance running a full TCP/IP stack but limited to 10M half duplex.
    Setup:
    The laptop has a static IP address. The network appliance has a static IP address. The switch has the factory default static IP address.  All three devices are on the same subnet.
    The laptop is plugged into port 1 on the switch, and the network appliance is plugged into various ports as described below.  The laptop is set to continuously ping the network appliance using the ping –t command.
    Problem:
    When the network appliance is plugged into switch port 2 I am unable to ping the device from the laptop.  When I plug it into port 3 I get the same result.  In fact I am unable to ping the network appliance on any of the switch ports EXCEPT for ports 7, 8, 15, and 16.  As soon as I plug the network appliance into any one of those four ports, the pings are replied to. 
    My question is - why am I unable to communicate with the network appliance on any ports other then ports 7, 8, 15, and 16? What makes these four ports different then the others?
    Other Notes:
    I have a second Linksys SRW2016 and notice the exact same behavior.
    I’ve also tried a Linksys SLM2008 8-Port switch and experience NO communication problems on any ports.
    I’ve tried a hub and it works 100%
    I notice that after trying to ping the network appliance on a non-working port, I can see the device properly listed in the ARP table on both the switch AND laptop. So I am unable to ping the device yet it somehow makes it into the ARP table.
    Any help with this issue would be greatly appreciated.
    Best regards,
    Rob

    Hi,
    Thanks for explanation that not all ports are the same.
    I've just had a similar issue with a Siemens C470IP ip phone. It worked fine with my Dlink 8-port DES3010F switch which I've just replaced with the SRW2016, and also when plugged into my Draytek 2820n ADSL router's LAN ports. I'm a bit disappointed that I happened to plug the device into port 3 and suddenly my monitoring showed that things were not working properly. I checked cables and then remembered that auto-negotiation sometimes can cause problems.
    On the SRW2016 if I leave the port with auto-negotiate on I see:
                                  Flow  
    Port   Enable   Link  Spd/Dpx Ctrl  
    g3      ENABLE   UP    10H     Off
    Yet inspite this pinging the device does not work properly. That is I get from ping:
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=431 ttl=128 time=7.357 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 432
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=433 ttl=128 time=8.956 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 434
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=435 ttl=128 time=5.920 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 436
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 437
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 438
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 439
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 440
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=441 ttl=128 time=9.242 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 442
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 443
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 444
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 445
    Doing the explicit configuration of 10Mb Half duplex as suggested does not help either. In fact it's worse as I get no responses from a ping and it does not make any difference if I enable flow control or not.
    So must be the Siemens device? Well plugging into port 16 as suggested makes all the difference:
    Auto negotiation works and the link comes up and works fine:
    That is:
                    Auto          Flow  
      Port   Enable  Neg.  Spd/Dpx Ctrl  
    g13      ENABLE   On   Auto    Off 
    g14      ENABLE   On   Auto    Off 
    g15      ENABLE   On   Auto    Off 
    g16      ENABLE   On   Auto    Off 
    and
                                    Flow  
      Port   Enable   Link  Spd/Dpx Ctrl  
      g14     ENABLE   DOWN  -----   ---
    g15     ENABLE   DOWN  -----   ---
    g16     ENABLE   UP    10H     Off
    and ping shows what I expect:
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=353 ttl=128 time=5.918 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=354 ttl=128 time=6.675 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=355 ttl=128 time=8.052 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=356 ttl=128 time=5.430 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=357 ttl=128 time=6.763 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=358 ttl=128 time=7.861 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=359 ttl=128 time=9.996 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=360 ttl=128 time=5.526 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=361 ttl=128 time=6.374 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=362 ttl=128 time=4.750 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=363 ttl=128 time=2.305 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=364 ttl=128 time=4.748 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=365 ttl=128 time=7.279 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=366 ttl=128 time=6.359 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=367 ttl=128 time=6.536 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=368 ttl=128 time=8.089 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.0.36: icmp_seq=369 ttl=128 time=8.797 ms
    So why is this broken? Is it a firmware issue or a hardware issue?  The firmware I'm using is I believe the latest though it looks rather old:
      Boot Version:          1.0.1 (Date:  11-Jun-2006, Time:  18:43:59)
      Software Version:      1.2.2b (Date:  28-Feb-2008, Time:  16:47:37)
      Hardware Version:      00.03.00
    If this affects me it's likely to affect others and I really wanted to buy the switch to add to the number of "managed ports" I have. This current behaviour is rather disappointing and I would have hoped that perhaps a firmware upgrade would solve this, or the documentation would be clearer that some devices do not work properly (auto-negotiation seems to be rather a troublesome subject).  Is such a fix available?

  • DDo you give a damn about problems with Firefox?

    With my last Mac I found that after using it a while the display would not change and I would have to go over the page with my cursor to get the new page. I was told this was a software problem which I did not believe and I bought a new iMac. The problem disappeared. When I installed Firefox 4.0b7 the problem came back but only with Firefox itself, i.e. not with any other application or with the finder. Is there something wrong with Firefox 4.0b7???
    Thanks for any info,
    Steve

    With my last Mac I found that after using it a while the display would not change and I would have to go over the page with my cursor to get the new page. I was told this was a software problem which I did not believe and I bought a new iMac. The problem disappeared. When I installed Firefox 4.0b7 the problem came back but only with Firefox itself, i.e. not with any other application or with the finder. Is there something wrong with Firefox 4.0b7???
    Thanks for any info,
    Steve

  • How do I stop I-cloud in outlook continued asking of password is very frustrating and when you insert password it comes up again and again and again

    How do I stop I-cloud accessing outlook and my emails I am continually asked for password is very frustrating and when you insert password it comes up again and again and again or says its incorrect password which it is not.

    If password is correct, then user name is not.

  • How Do You Populate A Spark List Control With An Array?

    Hello, all,
    Sorry to come accross so frustrated, but how in the name of God do you populate a Spark list control with the data in an array?  You used to be able to do this with the mx:List control, but the guys developing Flex just had to make things more difficult than they need to be!  I am more of a code purist and prefer doing things the way they have been done for decades, but apparently nothing can ever stay simple!
    I simply want to populate a list control with an array and this shouldn't be rocket science!  I found out that I must use a "collection" element, so I decided that an arrayCollection would be best.  However, after searching Adobe's documentation about arrayCollections, I am lost in a black hole of data binding, extra lines of code just to add a new element, the need to sort it, etc...!
    Here is my code:
    var pendingArray:ArrayCollection = new ArrayCollection();
    for ( var i:int = 0 ; i < queue.length ; i++ )
         var item:UserQueueItem = queue[i] as UserQueueItem ;
         if ( item.status == UserQueueItem.STATUS_PENDING )
         pendingArray.addItem({label:item.descriptor.displayName,descriptor:item.descriptor});
    Here is the relevant MXML:
    <s:VGroup>
         <s:List id="knockingList" width="110" height="100"/>              
    </s:VGroup>
    I'm not getting any errors, but the list is not populating.
    I have seen several examples where the arrayCollection is declared and populated in MXML:
            <mx:ArrayCollection id="myAC">
                <!-- Use an fx:Array tag to associate an id with the array. -->
                <fx:Array id="myArray">
                    <fx:Object label="MI" data="Lansing"/>
                    <fx:Object label="MO" data="Jefferson City"/>
                    <fx:Object label="MA" data="Boston"/>
                    etc...
               </fx:Array>
            </mx:ArrayCollection>
    That may be fine for an example, but I think this is a rare situation.  Most of the time I would image that the arrayCollection would be created and populated on the fly in ActionScript!  How can I do this?
    Thanks in advance for any help or advice anyone can give!
    Matt

    In your post it seemed like you were trying to take care of many considerations at once: optimization, design, architecture.  I would suggest you get something up and running and then worry about everything else.
    If I use data binding, then I will probably have to declare the  arrayCollection as a global variable and then I'll have to write 100 or  so extra lines of code to addItem(), removeItem(), sort(), etc...  It  just seems like too much overhead.
    I believe you may have some misconceptions about databinding in general.  You won't have to make it a global variable and you certainly won't need an extra 100 lines of code.  If you did this forum would be a very , very quiet place.
    I don't want to use data binding because the original array is refreshed  often and there is one function called by an event that re-declares the  arrayCollection each time, populates it with the array, and then sets  it as the list's dataprovider.
    That is the beauty of the ArrayCollection, it can handle the updates to its source Array. I don't know if you need to redeclare the ArrayCollection, resetting the source to the new Array allows everyone involved to keep their references so you don't have to worry about any "spooky" stuff going on.

  • Firefox 4 Beta crashes everytime I open it. Then I'm forced to close the program and it won't let me restart it since it says it's already running. Which isn't true. I'm done trying it. Do you guys know about this problem?

    Everytime I start Firefox 4 beta it crashes. I usually can visit one site on the web (doesn't matter what site) and then it locks up. The only thing that works on the browser then is the close button. After clicking the close button I'll try to restart the browser and I'll get an error message saying it can't open Firefox because it's already open. Which is a bunch of BS. The only I can get Firefox started again is to restart my computer. This is so frustrating that I've given up trying. Hopefully you guys know about this bug and can do something about it. I wasn't trying to post a question here I just wanted to make sure you guys heard about this problem.

    yeah it is the gayest thing that happens :S what i do is turn off the internet, then open it, then turn on internet, then use it. :S OR make your homepage a tab.

  • Cannot open your default e-mail folders. You must connect to Microsoft Exchange with the current profile before you can synchronize your folders with your Outlook data file (.ost)

    Fresh installation of Exchange Server 2013 on Windows Server 2012.
    Our first test account cannot access their email via Outlook but can access fine through OWA. The following message appears - "Cannot open your default e-mail folders. You must connect to Microsoft Exchange with the current profile before you can synchronize
    your folders with your Outlook data file (.ost)" is displayed.
    If I turn off cached Exchange mode, setting the email account to not
    cache does not resolve the issue and i get a new error message - "Cannot open your default e-mail folders. The file (path\profile name).ost is not an Outlook data file (.ost). Very odd since it creates its own .ost file when you run it for the first
    time.
    I cleared the appdata local Outlook folder and I tested on a new laptop that has never connected to Outlook, same error message on any system.
    Microsoft Exchange RPC Client Access service is running.
    No warning, error or critical messages in the eventlog, it's like the healthiest server alive.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated. I haven't encountered this issue with previous versions of Exchange.

    So it looks like a lot of people are having this issue and seeing how Exchange 2013 is still new (relatively to the world) there isn't much data around to answer this. I've spend ALOT of time trying to figure this out.
    Here is the answer. :) - No I don't know all but I'm going to try to give you the most reasonable answer to this issue, in a most logical way.
    First thing I did when I was troubleshooting this issue is that I ignored Martina Miskovic's suggestion for Step4 http://technet.microsoft.com/library/jj218640(EXCHG.150)because it didn't make sense to me because I was trying to connect
    Outlook not outside the LAN but actually inside. However, Martina's suggestion does fix the issue if it's applied in the correct context.
    This is where the plot thickens (it's stew). She failed to mention that things like SSL (which I configure practically useless - anyone who ever worked in a business environment where the owner pretty much trusts anyone in the company, otherwise they don't
    work there - very good business practice in my eyes btw, can confirm that...) are some sort of fetish with Microsoft lately. Exchange 2013 was no exception.
    In exchange 2003, exchange 2007 and exchange 2010 - you could install it and then go to outlook and set it up. And when outlook manual Microsoft Exchange profile would ask you for server name, you would give it and give the name of the person who you setting
    up - as long as machine is on the domain, not much more is needed. IT JUST WORKS! :) What a concept, if the person already on premises of the business - GIVE HIM ACCESS. I guess that was too logical for Microsoft. Now if you're off premises you can use things
    like OutlookAnywhere - which I might add had their place under that scenario.
    In Exchange 2013, the world changed. Ofcourse Microsoft doesn't feel like telling it in a plain english to people - I'm sure there is an article somewhere but I didn't find it. Exchange 2013 does not support direct configuration of Outlook like all of it's
    previous versions. Did you jaw drop? Mine did when I realized it. So now when you are asked for your server name in manual outlook set up and you give it Exchange2013.yourdomain.local - it says cannot connect to it. This happens because ALL - INTERNAL AND
    EXTERNAL connection are now handled via OutlookAnywhere. You can't even disable that feature and have it function the reasonable way.
    So now the question still remains - how do you configure outlook. Well under server properties there is this nice section called Outlook anywhere. You have a chance to configure it's External and Internal address. This is another thing that should be logical
    but it didn't work that way for me. When I configured the external address different from the internal - it didn't work. So I strongly suggest you get it working with the same internal address first and then ponder how you want to make it work for the outside
    users.
    Now that you have this set up you have to go to virtual directories and configure the external and internal address there - this is actually what the Step 4 that Martina was refering to has you do.
    Both external and internal address are now the same and you think you can configure your outlook manually - think again. One of the most lovely features of Outlook Anywhere, and the reason why I had never used it in the past is that it requires a TRUSTED
    certificate.
    See so it's not that exchange 2013 requires a trusted certificate - it's that exchange 2013 lacks the feature that was there since Windows 2000 and Exchange 5.5.
    So it's time for you to install an Active Direction Certificate Authority. Refer to this wonderful article for exact steps - http://careexchange.in/how-to-install-certificate-authority-on-windows-server-2012/
    Now even after you do that - it won't work because you have to add the base private key certificate, which you can download now from your internal certsrv site, to Default Domain Policy (AND yes some people claim NEVER mess with the Default Domain Policy,
    always make an addition one... it's up to you - I don't see direct harm if you know what you want to accomplish) see this: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc738131%28v=ws.10%29.aspx if you want to know exact steps.
    This is the moment of ZEN! :) Do you feel the excitement? After all it is your first time. Before we get too excited lets first request and then install the certificate to actual Exchange via the gui and assign it to all the services you can (IIS, SMTP and
    there is a 3rd - I forgot, but you get the idea).
    Now go to your client machine where you have the outlook open, browse to your exchange server via https://exchang2013/ in IE and if you don't get any certificate errors - it's good. If you do run on hte client and the server: gpupdate /force This will refresh
    the policy. Don't try to manually install the certificate from Exchange's website on the client. If you wanna do something manually to it to the base certificate from the private key but if you added it to the domain policy you shouldn't have to do it.
    Basically the idea is to make sure you have CA and that CA allows you to browse to exchange and you get no cert error and you can look at the cert and see that's from a domain CA.
    NOW, you can configure your outlook. EASY grasshoppa - not the manual way. WHY? Cause the automatic way will now work. :) Let it discover that exachange and populate it all - and tell you I'm happy! :)
    Open Outlook - BOOM! It works... Was it as good for you as it was for me?
    You may ask, why can't I just configure it by manual - you CAN. It's just a nightmare. Go ahead and open the settings of the account that got auto configed... How do you like that server name? It should read something like [email protected]
    and if you go to advanced and then connection tab - you'll see Outlook Anywhere is checked as well. Look at the settings - there is the name of the server, FQDN I might add. It's there in 2 places and one has that Mtdd-something:Exchange2013.yourdomain.local.
    So what is that GUID in the server name and where does it come from. It's the identity of the user's mailbox so for every user that setting will be different but you can figure it out via the console on the Exchange server itself - if you wish.
    Also a note, if your SSL certs have any trouble - it will just act like outlook can't connect to the exchange server even though it just declines the connection cause the cert/cert authority is not trusted.
    So in short Outlook Anywhere is EVERYWHERE! And it has barely any gui or config and you just supposed to magically know that kind of generic error messages mean what... Server names are now GUIDs of the [email protected] - THAT MAKES PERFECT
    SENSE MICROSOFT! ...and you have to manage certs... and the only place where you gonna find the name of the server is inside the d*** Outlook Anywhere settings in the config tab, un it's own config button - CAN WE PUT THE CONFIG ANY FURTHER!
    Frustrating beyond reason - that should be Exchange's new slogan...
    Hope this will help people in the future and won't get delete because it's bad PR for Microsoft.
    PS
    ALSO if you want to pick a fight with me about how SSL is more secure... I don't wanna hear it - go somewhere else...

Maybe you are looking for