Fssnap warning, 'Dump: Warning - directory at inode '2264' vanished!'

i was taking backup using fssnap, and got the following warning:
Dump: Warning - directory at inode '2264' vanished!
i have observed that this is the common warning and finishes backup after taking snapshot smoothly.
but what does this warning for?
any idea?
kashif

Usually means you are doing a backup while some other process is changing your file systems.
You need to check into and learn about file system snapshots. If you implement this before doing your backups, this problem will go away.

Similar Messages

  • [SOLVED] warning: directory permissions differ on var/log/wicd/

    Hi,
    I've seen several posts about this but I couldn't really figure out what's the appropriate action. Well, anyway I get the following error message when doing a pacman -Syu
    warning: directory permissions differ on var/log/wicd/
    filesystem: 1363 package: 755
    Is it a bug? Should I change the filepermission of the directory, and if so to what?
    Last edited by OMGitsUGOD (2009-09-18 10:38:32)

    This is sort of related,
    http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=432588
    or at least thats the post at the end has the same file permisions as I have in /var/log/wicd.
    $ ls -la /var/log/ | grep wicd
    d-wxrw--wt 2 root root 4096 2009-08-27 07:58 wicd
    I'm pretty bad at this stuff, but isn't this rather 1361 than 1363, or am I totally wrong? And why not allow theowner to read the file?
    Last edited by OMGitsUGOD (2009-09-17 08:43:32)

  • WARNING: directory '/opt/oracle' is not owned by root

    Installing CRS
    Need suggestions
    sudo /opt/oracle/10.2.0.1.0/root.shWARNING: directory '/opt/oracle' is not owned by root
    Checking to see if Oracle CRS stack is already configured
    /etc/oracle does not exist. Creating it now.
    Setting the permissions on OCR backup directory
    Setting up NS directories
    Oracle Cluster Registry configuration upgraded successfully
    WARNING: directory '/opt/oracle' is not owned by root
    /opt/oracle/10.2.0.1.0/bin/crsctl.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: can
    not open shared object file: No such file or directory
    Failure initializing entries in /etc/oracle/scls_scr/ricsflgrd402.
    ricsflgrd402.ric.infineon.com - ASMP01b:/opt/oracle

    missing STD C++ Libs
    see
    http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/install.102/b28053/toc.htm#BABIAECC
    however I would have thought that was there ...
    however

  • Warning: directory permissions differ

    I am getting an error when downloading and installing packages with pacman.
    This is what I get:
    $ sudo pacman -S nitrogen
    warning: nitrogen-1.2-1 is up to date -- reinstalling
    resolving dependencies...
    looking for inter-conflicts...
    Targets: nitrogen-1.2-1
    Total Download Size: 0.00 MB
    Total Installed Size: 0.13 MB
    Proceed with installation? [Y/n]
    checking package integrity...
    (1/1) checking for file conflicts [#####################] 100%
    (1/1) upgrading nitrogen [#####################] 100%
    warning: directory permissions differ on usr/man/man1/
    filesystem: 755 package: 700
    I don't know if that has a serious impact, but I am sure it shouldn't be like that...

    Snowman wrote:Submit a bug report.
    This is one way and i hope it helps you and the other devs. But what do you think about that the systems can repair this by itselfs? On my opensuse server i have a tool named chkstat which runs as a cronjob and set the file permissions as loaded from a file.
    Source: http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/distrib … 11.src.rpm
    manpage: http://www.trinler.de/de/linux/man.html?command=chkstat
    The advantage from my side is that one or a group of devs define the file permissions standard for arch linux and everyone can choose to use it or to append own more or less secure/paranoid settings. Another sideeffect is that every dev can take a look inside this config file to see what permission the own PKGBUILD need so that in the best case we will not see such messages in the future. The source includes config files so there is no need to restyle this all from zero.

  • What to do about warning "directory permissions differ on..." ?

    Hello!
    I have gotten this warning when upgrading today:
    warning: directory permissions differ on var/run/gdm/
    filesystem: 1775  package: 711
    warning: directory permissions differ on var/log/gdm/
    filesystem: 1770  package: 755
    This means that the permissions on my computer didn't match with the ones from the package being upgraded/installed, right?
    Which permissions should I leave for that folder (var/log/gdm/) and why? And why is the warning on there twice with different values? i'm confused
    Last edited by trusktr (2010-04-06 18:07:37)

    trusktr wrote:
    Hello!
    I have gotten this warning when upgrading today:
    warning: directory permissions differ on var/run/gdm/
    filesystem: 1775  package: 711
    warning: directory permissions differ on var/log/gdm/
    filesystem: 1770  package: 755
    This means that the permissions on my computer didn't match with the ones from the package being upgraded/installed, right?
    Which permissions should I leave for that folder (var/log/gdm/) and why? And why is the warning on there twice with different values? i'm confused
    If you or another package had good reason to change it, leave it at its current value. If not, change it to the package value listed above (and see if anything breaks).
    You're seeing different permissions for two different folders: read the warnings more closely.

  • Directory seems to have vanished since 10.5 and can't access backup

    In my Documents directory I have several sub directories. This directory was backed up by SilverKeeper (the free utility that comes with LaCie drives). Since upgrading to Leopard my directory now appears to be a file of zero size and the files that were in that directory are nowhere to be seen. I am getting the same result accessing the backup on the LaCie drive which leads me to believe that Leopard is somehow not recognizing it as a directory properly for some unknown reason.
    Some pretty critical files were stored there. Any suggestions?
    Mark

    djaffe wrote:
    Hi folks,
    So I decided to go back to Leopard after having too many problems with SL, particularly Office. I had to do an erase and install, and now when I try to restore from one of my pre-SL backups on TM, it says the entire TM drive is not accessible because it was created with a "Newer version of MAc OS X".
    Most likely, your Leopard install disc was an older version than the one you were last running from, and you didn't install the "combo" update to get back to it.
    But as Kiraly says, the best thing to do is a full restore of your entire system. See item #14 in the Frequently Asked Questions *User Tip* at the top of this forum.

  • Warning in backup

    Hi all,
    �Could you please me what this message mean: "/ : directory at inode '619895' vanished"?
    This happens when i perform a backup at operating systema level with ufsdump.
    Thanks.

    Usually means you are doing a backup while some other process is changing your file systems.
    You need to check into and learn about file system snapshots. If you implement this before doing your backups, this problem will go away.

  • Help ----- DUMP: bread: dev_seek error: I/O error

    Dear All,
    While taking a backup I am facing some problem with one mount point in the server, getting the below error when taking a backup on tape with the help of UFSDUMP. Solaris 9 is running in this server.
    Could you please help me to resolve this issue.
    DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Tue Jun 24 00:41:12 2008
    DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch
    DUMP: Dumping /dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5 (oneseb-db04:/u03/oradata01) to /dev/rmt/0n.
    DUMP: Mapping (Pass I) [regular files]
    DUMP: Mapping (Pass II) [directories]
    DUMP: Warning - block 3368716482 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191232' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 3905158684 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191232' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 2597510354 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191232' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 2229987560 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191232' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 3738995400 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191232' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 3538550288 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191232' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 2630545058 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191232' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 3939165426 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191232' is corrupted
    DUMP: bread: dev_seek error: I/O error
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191232' is corrupted
    DUMP: bread: dev_seek error: I/O error
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191232' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 3402426878 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191232' is corrupted
    DUMP: bread: dev_seek error: I/O error
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191232' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 3404785796 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - block 3740293120 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - block 2585158234 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - block 3737701000 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191234' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 3270034430 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191234' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 479908572 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191234' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 3531926248 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191234' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 3906919562 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191234' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 3369265662 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191234' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 278711022 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191234' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 2733296356 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191234' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 4093640702 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191234' is corrupted
    DUMP: bread: dev_seek error: I/O error
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191234' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 2563427560 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191234' is corrupted
    DUMP: bread: dev_seek error: I/O error
    DUMP: Warning - directory at inode `8191234' is corrupted
    DUMP: Warning - block 2831872232 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: Warning - block 2229203032 is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5'
    DUMP: SIGSEGV() ABORTING!
    /backup/backup.sh[475]: 24508 Abort(coredump)
    FAILED: Backup of /dev/rdsk/c2t40d2s5 (/u03/oradata01) failed.
    Thanks
    Edited by: pravin.scsa on Jun 25, 2008 6:58 AM

    Problem solved itself.... interesting drive problem.... would only pick up on disc occasionally

  • Directory permission warning

    warning: directory permissions differ on usr/bin/
    filesystem: 4755 package: 755
    should i go about changing /usr/bin dir to 4755?

    No, it is already at 4755, which is plain wrong: chmod 755 /usr/bin

  • [SOLVED] Need Help Understanding Warning on Directory Permissions

    Hi guys-
    In my last update I got these warnings:
    warning: directory permissions differ on /usr/share/polkit-1/rules.d/
    filesystem: 700 package: 755
    warning: directory permissions differ on /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/
    filesystem: 755 package: 770
    I've seen quite a few threads floating around like these, but they just add to my confusion. I have not changed persmissions to these files. From what I've gathered so far from a few threads is that the package handler may have changed persmissions resulting in the warning messages. This is where my confusion sets in, and I don't know if it's from staring at the screen for too long, but if I cd into those directories and ls -l, there's the rules.d directory with 700:
    /usr/share/polkit-1/:
    total 8
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 14 10:39 actions
    drwx------ 2 polkitd root 4096 Jun 16 18:31 rules.d
    However, if I cd into rules.d, there's two files in there, both with 644 permissions:
    total 8
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 281 Jun 1 02:17 50-libvirt.rules
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 488 May 12 17:11 gnome-control-center.rules
    Where's the file with 755?
    Same thing with the other wanring. There's qemu with 755. Libvirt is 755. The directory inside qemu is empty. Where's 770?
    total 36
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 2 05:39 boot
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 2 05:39 dnsmasq
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 2 05:39 filesystems
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 2 05:39 images
    drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Mar 2 05:39 lockd
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 2 05:39 lxc
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 2 05:39 network
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 10 19:05 qemu
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 2 05:39 uml
    Can someone help me understand this please?
    Last edited by w201 (2015-06-17 03:23:03)

    The message does indeed mean that the package maintainer has changed the permissions on those directories. You can change your directories to match or leave them as-is. I always change mine when I get messages like this. To do that in this case, you'd run:
    chmod 755 /usr/share/polkit-1/rules.d
    chmod 770 /var/lib/libvirt/qemu
    That will make your directories consistent with the new versions of the packages.

  • How to turn off the warning message when re-compiling jsp in embedded OC4J?

    Members,
    I would like to remove the annoying warning messages whenever we re-compile a jsp file using embedded OC4J.
    Steps:
    1. create an web project
    2. create a test jsp file (say, test.jsp)
    3. run the jsp file.
    4. on the jsp visual editor, modify the jsp file.
    5. go to the browser, reload the page. the following warning messages are displayed:
    06/03/03 08:09:13 Warning: directory C:\Projects\TestAgain\UserInterface\public_html\WEB-INF\classes doesn't exist on classpath
    06/03/03 08:09:14 C:\Projects\TestAgain\UserInterface\classes\.jsps\_test.java:31: warning #556: variable session assigned to but never used
    06/03/03 08:09:14 HttpSession session = pageContext.getSession();
    06/03/03 08:09:14 ^
    06/03/03 08:09:14 C:\Projects\TestAgain\UserInterface\classes\.jsps\_test.java:32: warning #559: variable __jsp_tag_starteval declared but never used
    06/03/03 08:09:14 int __jsp_tag_starteval;
    06/03/03 08:09:14 ^
    06/03/03 08:09:14 C:\Projects\TestAgain\UserInterface\classes\.jsps\_test.java:33: warning #556: variable application assigned to but never used
    06/03/03 08:09:14 ServletContext application = pageContext.getServletContext();
    06/03/03 08:09:14 ^
    06/03/03 08:09:14 C:\Projects\TestAgain\UserInterface\classes\.jsps\_test.java:35: warning #556: variable page assigned to but never used
    06/03/03 08:09:14 _test page = this;
    06/03/03 08:09:14 ^
    06/03/03 08:09:14 C:\Projects\TestAgain\UserInterface\classes\.jsps\_test.java:36: warning #556: variable config assigned to but never used
    06/03/03 08:09:14 ServletConfig config = pageContext.getServletConfig();
    06/03/03 08:09:14 ^
    06/03/03 08:09:14 C:\Projects\TestAgain\UserInterface\classes\.jsps\_test.java:37: warning #556: variable __ojsp_varRes assigned to but never used
    06/03/03 08:09:14 javax.servlet.jsp.el.VariableResolver __ojsp_varRes = (VariableResolver)new OracleVariableResolverImpl(pageContext);
    06/03/03 08:09:14
    I'm so much glad to see JDeveloper giving out all the details and warnings, but sometimes they spit out too much warning messages that simply annoys and distracts my programming.
    There seems to be no parameters for me to shut those up, maybe I should do it manually?
    thanks.

    Ronald,
    I've already tried setting up the j2ee-config.xml file, but
    it seems that the warning message does not come from the oc4j, but is generated when jsp file is being compiled, so no matter what you do with the j2ee-config.xml, it would not work to remove the warnings.
    I was thinking maybe I could setup the java compiler option found in server.xml, by adding -nowarn option in javac options attribute, but it seems that the file server.xml gets overwritten automatically whenever the oc4j restarts (so, no avail).
    So... any other ideas?

  • [SOLVED] Help with some warning messages regarding permissions.

    Hey, I received these warnings from pacman during an upgrade:
    [2010-02-20 13:24] warning: directory permissions differ on var/run/gdm/
    filesystem: 1775  package: 1777
    [2010-02-20 13:24] warning: directory permissions differ on var/log/gdm/
    filesystem: 1770  package: 755
    Any idea what they mean?:/
    Last edited by trusktr (2010-03-21 19:50:12)

    Yeah grey, it's the former i'm referring to. I know what permissions are.
    Thanks n0dix for those links! That's precisely what it is.
    Last edited by trusktr (2010-03-21 18:08:08)

  • Fssnap errors

    hi,
    i am getting following errors during fssnap backup.
    1: ioctl error 22,
    2: warning: superblock on /dev/rfssnap/0 is corrupt.
    3: directory on xxx inode is vanished.
    and after backing up / filesystem in to /export/home/snapshots_feb08/, it filled the size of /export/home/snapshots_feb08 to 100%
    any idea?
    regards
    kashif

    Here is a process I use all the time. And Yes you can fssnap a live system.
    This artical is for x86 but you can adjust it to work for sparc.
    http://solaris-x86.org/documents/tutorials/jsrestore.mhtml

  • GDM update: directory permissions differ on /var/log/gdm/

    Hello,
    Running Arch 64Bits kernel 3.9.9-1 with systemd and i got the following warning during a gdm update today:
    (1/6) upgrading libgdm [######################] 100%
    (2/6) upgrading gdm [######################] 100%
    warning: directory permissions differ on /var/log/gdm/
    filesystem: 711 package: 1770
    Why would gdm need some 1770 permissions for log files? Looks pretty suspicious to me, especially the sticky bit thing. What did i miss?
    PS: BTW the update is successful (it's a warning afterall, not an error)
    Thanks
    EDIT:
    Looks like the opposite situation than 3 years ago:
    https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=94681
    https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19294
    EDIT2: here's what i have in /var/log:
    msytux666 var # ls -la
    total 64
    drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 Jul 6 15:34 .
    drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 4096 Jul 16 20:24 ..
    -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4192 Jun 19 11:27 .com.zerog.registry.xml
    drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jul 7 00:07 abs
    drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4096 Jun 16 17:28 cache
    drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jun 17 19:07 db
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 31 20:40 empty
    drwxrwxr-x 2 root games 4096 May 31 20:40 games
    drwx--x--x 2 gdm gdm 4096 Jun 15 14:23 gdm
    drwxr-xr-x 26 root root 4096 Jul 16 01:13 lib
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 31 20:40 local
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 May 31 20:40 lock -> ../run/lock
    drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 Jul 18 00:33 log
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 May 31 20:40 mail -> spool/mail
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 31 20:40 opt
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 May 31 20:40 run -> ../run
    drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 Jun 16 17:28 spool
    drwxrwxrwt 8 root root 4096 Jul 18 00:33 tmp
    gdm is owned by gdm, so why would it needs 1770 permissions?
    EDIT3:
    After further research i appear the way gdm is installed may matter.
    Well i installed gdm through pacman and always update it with pacman as well. Never manually compiled/make_install'd it nor used abs for it.
    Last edited by BGK (2013-07-19 21:37:13)

    Okay I'm confused ...
    Commit:https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit … 92c38d536d
    @@ -68,8 +68,7 @@ package_gdm() {
    cd $pkgbase-$pkgver
    make DESTDIR="$pkgdir" install
    - chmod 1770 "$pkgdir/var/log/gdm"
    - chmod 700 "$pkgdir/var/lib/gdm/.config/dconf"
    + chmod 711 "$pkgdir/var/log/gdm"
    rm -r "$pkgdir/var/run" "$pkgdir/var/gdm"
    ### Split libgdm
    so that takes away the 1770 permissions, and replaces them with 711. 
    @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ post_install() {
    getent passwd gdm > /dev/null 2>&1 || usr/sbin/useradd -c 'Gnome Display Manager' -u 120 -g gdm -d /var/lib/gdm -s /sbin/nologin gdm
    passwd -l gdm > /dev/null
    chown -R gdm:gdm /var/lib/gdm > /dev/null
    + chown root:gdm /var/log/gdm > /dev/null
    glib-compile-schemas /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas
    gtk-update-icon-cache -q -t -f /usr/share/icons/hicolor
    however:
    chown root:gdm /var/log/gdm > /dev/null
    .. is where I get confused.  This command makes root and the group gdm the new owners of /var/log/gdm, or did I go wrong somewhere?

  • [SOLVED] Systemd 2.18 - directory ownership

    Have this issue with new systemd. When I install it gives me two lines of a warning, is this safe to ignore?
    warning: directory ownership differs on /var/log/journal/remote/
    filesystem: 0:999 package: 0:0
    If not how would I go about figuring out what this means and how to remedy it?
    Also I've upgraded my Arch system but when I boot it still says loading systemd 2.17, not 2.18, wierd, any thoughts?
    Last edited by ad2phnx (2015-01-03 16:08:22)

    ad2phnx wrote:Also I've upgraded my Arch system but when I boot it still says loading systemd 2.17, not 2.18, wierd, any thoughts?
    There are already a few threads about this e.g. https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=191243
    Rebuild your initramfs.
    Last edited by karol (2015-01-02 05:57:00)

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can I include 2 diff strctures in d same wsdl file in a webservice scenario

    Hii all, We are using webservice to webservice scenario in which sender shld b able to send all the new rquest to the target and receive any updations or modifications from the receiver. Few fields are different for request and modification structure

  • My powerbook is just about to run out of space!

    any ideas for how i can store all my files, photos, songs, movies...etc. thanks

  • Hi, Im having a problem downloading itunes 10.5

    Im having a problem downloading itune 10.5 and an error message comes up saying "There is a problem with this windows installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your support personnel or package vendo

  • DBM order - table to delete split

    Dear Sap Expert i would like to know what is the table to delete for split data in /DBM/Order. Currently im using ECC 5.0. The user had wrongly do split. The DBM cant delete through front end screen. I need to delete it from table. Need your suggest

  • Open a terminal which is running screen inside the specified directory

    I'm dabbling around with screen and so far I have conjured the following sheme: I start my terminal with terminal --hide-menubar --geometry-120x45 -e "screen -d -R SessionName" What I want to do is this: When I right click in a directory in thunar I