FSV and F.01

Hi ,
We created FSV and assigned all GL accounts in FSV. The F.01 report was working perfect.
I created two more new GL accounts and assigned to the same FSV again and transported it to the Prod.
After transportingthese new 2 GL accounts , 6 old GL accounts are missing (not visible) in that FSV and those accounts are appearing at the end of the F.01 report as if they are appended to the report.
Please kindly provide ideas on this. Why is this happening ?
Thanks,
Krishna Kireeti

Hi Krishna,
First check the below
- Before adding the 2 new GL accounts, did u make any changes ie deleted the old 6 GL accounts by mistake or you must have changed the node for those 6 GL s by mistake and saved it, so when the request is moved to PRD, it will reflect the 2 new GLs and the old 6 GL's wil not be shown or are shown under different node.
- Or did you create 2 seperate transport requst by any chance and u might have not moved the requests in order which could result in this problem
What you can do is Reconfigure the FSV through OB58 once again add all the GLaccounts to the respective nodes afresh and then retransport the request to Quality. Test it if its correct move to PRD.
Hope this helps. Pls assing poitns as a way to say thanks
regards,
radhika

Similar Messages

Differences in FSV and KE30

Dear All,
I am getting differences in FSV and COPA - KE30. Even the top-line does not match. I have no unassigned accounts. Can you anyone please let me know.

Hi,
KE30 -COPA reports get their value from profitability segment docs...which r created during SD and MM processes. If a direct GL to GL entry is posted then it wont create a profit segment doc.
Now in ur case the FSV and KE30 report r not matching as FSV are reports taking GL totals... and GL totals need nto match with KE30 as there might be some docs with one GL to Gl posting...
Regards,
Kiran

Your opinion about creating new accounts, FSV and legal statements

Hello friends.
I was asked to cretate a managerial statement with New GL accounts for managerial postins only (postings on these new accounts can not influence balances of legal Balance sheet and P&L).
Dou you see any problem if I create those Gl accounts in the same Chart of accounts used by the legal staments (balance and P&L) and include them in a new FSV?
Thank you,
Naej

Hi Naej,
I can see two solutions to your requirement:-
1. Create the seperate range of managerial gl accounts such that their totals comes to zero and include in FSV as non-assigned account, so will not impact your main balance sheet and P&L account.
2. Create a new ledger for managerial account and post to the manegerial account only in these ledger in addition to the normal posting. This will clearly seperate the legal books away from the managerial books.
Regards,
Gaurav

Differences of GLs in FSV and BI Report

Dear Friends,
Every month when BI Report is downloaded, it leads to differences in some of the GLs in BI Report in comparison with FSV.
I want to find a permanent solution to this.
Please suggest.
Regards
Sridhar

HI,
For those GL where gap is coming drilldown the report based on the docuemnt level & check which documents are getting missed.& check is there any delta upload which is failed
Regards,

Relationship between FINANCIAL STATEMENT ITEM and GL ACCOUNT NUMBER

hii experts...
can anyone tell me the relationship between FINANCIAL STATEMENT ITEM (FIELD NAME: ERGSL) and GL ACCOUNT number corresponding to that FSV..
and if these fields are present in any table... den please do tell...
thanks in advance.

Thanks Raymond for giving me suggestion...
bt wat actually is my problem na...
i m creating a balance sheet in BAPI and in this I need FSV and GL account number...
i got everyting bt i cant find the realtionship between these two fields...
hope u understand my problem..

Text in FSV by using alternative COA

I have created a FSV with alternative account nos. If i run F.01 by giving company code, FSV and by selecting alternative account no., only i am able to get the alternative gl account no. in item text coloumn, i am not getting the text alongwith no. in output.

hi bsr
i have checked out all the possibilities that could lead to the problem which u r facing, i want u to check ur g/l mapping in fse2
regards
sayeed

The client is looking for trial balance and GL balance reports in Spanish

hi sap techis
I am facing a typical issue.the client is looking for trial balance report and GL balance report in Spanish language.the problem is if i change the language key from English to Spanish the entire language will be changed to Spanish is there any way by which without changing the language key in chart of accounts, we can obtain the reports in Spanish language.please help in taking out reports in Spanish from F.01 in Spanish
Edited by: akausar on Apr 16, 2010 12:42 AM

You have to translate all your financial statement version nodes from English to Spanish to be able to see Spanish texts in F.01. To translate, execute T Code SE63 and choose Translation -> ABAP Objects -> Other Long Texts from the menu. Then expand 'FI FI Balance Sheet/P&L Statement' and double-click on 'FIBS FI Balance Sheet/P&L Statement '. Then change the source language to EN and target language to ES (they are greyed out but you will still be able to pick them from the drop-down menu). Now put the cursor on Object Name field and press F4. You will see the financial statements you have created in OB58. It is a cumbersome task, but you have to drilldown to each node of your FSV and double-click on it and in the following screen you will see the English text on top. In the bottom part of the screen you have to enter the Spanish text.
Once you are done with translation, execute program RS_LXE_RECORD_TORDER and then push your translations into a transport request.

Not assigned account in FSV

HI, Expert
I have run F.01 for Balance sheet , when i drill down it show not assign account like first i click on gl account then company code then it shows not assigned ,can any one explan me how it shows
Regards
gk

it not shown in lower level of the FSV , i already checked it assigned in proper place but when i drill down it shows not assigned
I am really confused, you said it is not shown in FSV and again it assigned in proper place. Can you please give me some example for your issue.
Regards,
Ravi

FSV issue

Hello Experts,
We have an issue while extracting Financial Statement Version. (T.code F.01) with comparing previous year. GL account is assigned in FSV. The FSV created in 2010.
when extracting FSV In year 2009 GL account is showing in unassigned items
But while extracting for 2010 same GL account showing in assigned items.
However when we extracted for year 2010 comparing with year 2009 the GL account showing at two places i.e. as assigned and unassigned.
Is it normal to have in two places. Please provide solution for showing GL at one place when report executed.
Thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Bramhendra

HI,
The scenario is as follows:
client is maintaing one FSV say ABCD where GL accont xxx is assigned under one node in 2009. Client asked to copy same FSV and to create new FSV with new GL's added to it and few GL deleted from the list. I have copied ABCD and created new FSV EFGH in 2010. (gl account xxx is not changed)
Now when I am comparing 2009 with 2010 for new FSV EFGH, GL account xxx is getting displayed at two places i.e. assigned and under un assigned category.
When I am extracting for only 2009 using EFGH FSV, GL xxx is showing under unassigned category and extracting report for 2010 using EFGH FSV same GL is showing under assigned category.
Please let me know how to resolve this. AS one GL can be displayed at one place only.
Thanks

FI-CO Financial Statement FSV vs. Accounting Groups?

Hi Experts,
I have a BW reporting to build financial statement reports, which is the best input structure for BW among Financial Statements Version (FSV) and Accounting Groups.
Thanks in advance,
Roger Andy

Hi Srikanth,
Please confirm me whether I understood correctly or not
1. In ECC all standard reports (SLR_*) uses FSV as input.
2. In general each company code will have its own FSV, but I am little confused about the statement "you can have many FSVs per GL accounts", can you please clarify this.
3. What is exactly "FSV's can be GAAP specific" means
4. Please confirm both FSV and Accounting Groups are in sync or not.
Please confirm the above points.
Thanks,
Andy Roger

Rules for doors and interface is junk

Need to have a rule for all doors and when I try to edit a old rule it takes me to MAKE A NEW RULE. this is junk. Does anyone test the software before sending it out. And why change it? it was working fine now we have to learn how to navagate the new software.

Hi,
Please check the following settings:
1. Go to Transaction Code FS00. Give your Bank GL A/c number and press enter. Click on "Create/Bank/Interest" and find out your FSG. For example your FSG is G005.
2. Go to Transaction Code OBC4. Select your Company code's FSV and double click on "Field Status Groups". Then select FSG which is available in your bank GL account (G005) and double click on it. Now you can find various Groups.
3. Open another screen and go to the transaction code for posting keys OB41. Double click on your posting key. (Its may be either 40 or 50). Click on "Maintain Field Status".
4. Now you can compare various field statuses which are available in Posting Keys and Field Status Groups. Field Statuses between these two should be same. It not make necessary changes accordingly and save the data.
5. Now close your existing SM35 session and open it again. Select your session and press Shift+F4 to release the session. Now you can execute your batch input session.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Kannusamy S

View B/S and P/L on Company level.

Dear Experts,
I have configured Company through OX15, also assigned the company code with the same.
I want to know from which transaction code we can view the B/S and P/L account on company level.
Please noted not in comapny code lever but by company level.
I want to view the consolidated BS and PL for my group.
Regards
Uttam.
Moderator: Please, read about the basic concept of SAP and the difference between Company and Company code

Hi,
If you want to report group level then goto F.01 or FGI0 there select your group chart of accounts and enter your Group FSV and excute.
Regards,
nauma.

PC report S_E38_98000088 does not display periodic values

Dear colleagues,
In ECC6.0/new GL we are trying to use report S_E38_98000088 to display Actual/Plan values for a specific month/period, but it looks like the system will always show a cumulative value since the beginning of the fiscal year.
We enter the following on the selection screen:
Currency type: 10
Company code: XXXX
Account number: XXXXXXXX
Ledger: 0L
Controlling area: XXXX
Plan version: 1
Fiscal year: 2011
From Period: 4
To period: 4
Profit Center: XXXXXXX
But when we execute the report, and srill down to the line item level, we see that the report picks up all posting in 2011 instead of 04.2011 only.
The same happens if we try to execute the report for 12.2010 - it will select all postings in 2010.
Anyone knows why is it working like that and how can I display a specific period?
Many thanks,
Yoel.

Shalom yoel,
this is not a bug.
Please bear in mind that this report shows cumulative values
for Balance Sheet accounts.
The calculated keyfigure BILWERT (Balance Sheet Value) behaves in
different ways for balance sheet and for P+L accounts. For balance sheet
accounts it always provides you with cumulated values. For example
for period 6 to 6 it will show cumulated value for periods 1 - 6 plus
balance carry forward value.
The BILWER is calculated like:
BILWERT = WERTB + WERTE,
WERTB - Balance sheet accounts value
WERTE - Income statement account value
But if an account is a P+L statement account, you will see the
real period balance value for the particular period range. It means,
that for period 6-6 you will see value for the single period 6. For
period 1-6 you will see cumulated value for period range 1 - 6 without
balance carry forward.
The report behaviour is dependent on your Financial Statement Version
(FSV) and how the particular accounts are valuated.
It means the following:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1) All accounts assigned to the nodes "Assets" and "Liab+Equity" are
   taken as balance sheet accounts and cumulated values are provided
   for those accounts by report S_PL0_86000028 (and other GL reports)!!
2) All accounts which are not assigned within the FSV at all are
   considered as balance sheet accounts and cumulated values are
   provided by GL drilldown reports.
3) All accounts which are assigned OUT of "Assets" and "Liab+Equity"
   nodes within particular FSV are taken as Profit and Loss acounts and
   period values are provided for them in the GL drilldown reports
The original settings (which you can see under T-cd: FS00) has no
influence on it when using the FI-GL drilldown reports.
Please take into account the note 1154817 and the documentation
to OB58 and RFBILA00 how should define the correct FSV structure.
That is the design and usage of the hierarchy of the Financial Statement
Version and key figure.
There is no error in the standard system
br, Guido

GL not appearing in Profit Center Report

Hello Gurus,
A strange error is coming in SAP. I have created a GL with reference to another GL in Same chart of account and have posted few entries in that GL.
But the problem is that all GL are coming except that GL in PC Trial Balance Report S_ALR_87013440. Just to update you that its coming in F.01 Report.
Kindly help because our system is on 4.7 version and they need to run this report only for PC Trial Balance Report S_ALR_87013440 as they dont have Business Area Concept.
Please help urgently,
Regards,
Ankur

Hi,
S_ALR_87013440 is a report from PS (Project Info System) is the T-code correct. Apart from that, you said that the GL account appears in F.01 report (financial statements) so the corresponding FSV (financial statemnet version) is maintained.
You can try (test-client first) to copy this FSV to EC-PCA using T-code KE5B to keep FSV and EC-PCA account groups in line.
Best regards, Christian

First PKGBUILD: fsv2 (3D File System Visualizer, gtk2 port)

The purpose of this thread is to see whether the PKGBUILD is correct/adequate and whether there is interest in this package.
I have managed to create a working PKGBUILD for fsv2 based on the one for the original fsv and the wiki prototype. The guidelines state that the package has to be useful - "more than a few people" would have to be interested. The original fsv PKGBUILD is out of date and the last comment is nine months old, but one can hope.
It seems illogical that a program with a GUI suggests a text-based browser to view the provided documentation. I've left it in the PKGBUILD just in case, but one could easily suggest a different browser or perhaps use a simple text editor to view the documentation. Also, I have not tested it on x86-64 since I do not have access to such a machine.
pkgname=fsv2
pkgver=1.1.0
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="gtk2 port of fsv, the 3D File System Visualizer as seen in Jurassic Park"
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
url="http://fedorchenko.net/fsv2.php"
license=('LGPL')
depends=('xorg-server' 'gtkglarea' 'gdk-pixbuf2' 'ftgl' 'gtkmm')
#optdepends=('lynx: help browser')
options=('!libtool')
source=(http://fedorchenko.net/src/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.bz2)
md5sums=('3a8e5e6a9b2e5cdc7a111765a2f18599')
build() {
cd "$srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver"
./configure --prefix=/usr
make
package() {
cd "$srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver"
make DESTDIR="$pkgdir/" install
Edit: fixed namcap errors and warnings
Last edited by al (2012-01-19 05:23:10)

I did some corrections:
pkgname=fsv2
pkgver=1.1.0
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="GTK2 port of fsv, the 3D File System Visualizer as seen in Jurassic Park"
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
url="http://fedorchenko.net/fsv2.php"
license=('LGPL')
depends=('ftgl' 'gtkglarea' 'gtkmm')
#optdepends=('lynx: help browser')
options=('!libtool')
source=("http://downloads.sf.net/sourceforge/${pkgname}/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.bz2")
md5sums=('3a8e5e6a9b2e5cdc7a111765a2f18599')
build() {
cd "$srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver"
./configure --prefix=/usr
make
package() {
cd "$srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver"
make DESTDIR="$pkgdir/" install
# vim:set ts=2 sw=2 et:
Looking at namcap output on PKGBUILD and built package will help you a lot.
Remember to put the Maintainer tag at the beginning.
BTW, I suggest that you take care of gtkglarea package as well, since the current AUR one is not good at all.
Here's my take on it (tested):
# Contributor: arjan <[email protected]>
# Contributor: Tom Newsom <[email protected]>
# Contributor: Luca Bennati <lucak3 AT gmail DOT com>
# Maintainer: Andreas B. Wagner <[email protected]>
pkgname=gtkglarea
pkgver=2.0.1
pkgrel=2
pkgdesc="GTK/GL Area libraries"
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
url="http://mono-project.com/GtkGLArea"
license=('LGPL')
depends=('gtk2' 'mesa')
options=('!libtool')
source=("http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/${pkgname}/2.0/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz")
md5sums=('2a81a86cfa80a920a5454dd00fad2e1d')
build() {
cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname}-${pkgver}"
sed -r -i -e '5 a\AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4])' configure.ac
sed -r -i -e 's/(ACLOCAL_FLAGS =)/\1 -I m4/' Makefile.am
sed -r -i -e 's/(LDADD =)/\1 -lm/' examples/Makefile.am
sed -r -i -e 's/(Libs: .*)/\1 -lm/' gtkgl-2.0.pc.in
libtoolize --copy --force
autoreconf -vfi
./configure --prefix=/usr --with-lib-GL
make
package() {
cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname}-${pkgver}"
make DESTDIR="${pkgdir}" install
# vim:set ts=2 sw=2 et:
Remember to adjust the Maintainer tag if you adopt this one.
I built and tested successfully gtkglarea and fsv2.

FSV and F.01

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for