FTP TO RFC using BPM
hello
I am creating a scenario of
File to RFC, Using BPM where in again input from File and updating using RFC in multiple steps...( Not creating a scenario of FTP to RFC to FTP )
do i have any web-blog or step wise guide for above scenario
Regards,
Keith
Hello Keith,
The file to RFC scenario can be implemented in the following steps,
1. In the design, create the requsite DataType, MessageType and MessageInterfaces. One message interface will be outbound asynch and the other will be inbound async.
2. Do the message mapping and also the interface mapping as required.
In the configuration, the following has to be done,
1. Create 2 communication channels. One for file as sender and the other for RFC as the receiver.
2. Create 1 sender agreement and 1 receiver agreement. In the sender agreement give your FILE communication channel and in the receiver agreement give your RFC communication channel.
3. Then, do the receiver determination, interface determination.
4. In each of this, the sender service is the business system you have created and the receiver service is the system in which your RFC resides.
Regards,
Bhavesh
Similar Messages
-
hey guys
i m doin a synchronous File to RFC scenario using BPM and getting a 'NO receiver found error' in MONI,i checked my File as well as RFC adapter in RWB,the sender File adapter is green,RFC adpater is also green and the receiver file adapter is green but says 'no message processing until now'
i m takin help from the followin blog
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
the error in MONI is
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- <!-- Receiver Grouping
-->
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">NO_RECEIVER_CASE_ASYNC</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>No receiver could be determined</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
I checked SM58 as well but it does not have any error XML messages.
and idea where shuld i check?
i check my mappin by using payload from MONI,mapping is working fine
thanx
ahmad
Message was edited by:
Ahmad ansariHi Ahmad,
In which step is the error occurring?
Have you checked your BMP status using SXMB_MONI_BPE?
PS: Usefull link: <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e7bc3a5a-0501-0010-1095-eb47159e169c">How To Monitor Integration Process (ccBPM)</a>
Regards,
Sergio -
Hi People
I am trying to create File to RFC by using BPM, i got 1 blogs form Arpit Seth this is good but i am confusing in ID only i created 1 business service in that i created 3CC 1 is RFC receiver, 2 is File sender 3 is File is receiver this processes is correct are not, and also i am getting problem in Sender agreement, receiver agreement, and receiver determination, interface determination.
Pls tell me the process for this scenario don't send Arpit Seth blog
Regards
shekarHi people
i am getting this problem pls tell me the solution for this
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- <!-- Receiver Identification
-->
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">NO_RECEIVER_CASE_ASYNC</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>No receiver could be determined</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
regards
shekar -
hello all..
i knw the RFC calls being synchronous..
i knw i can call RFC to RFC without using BPM..
i was wondering, if i go in for an RFC to RFC call with uing BPM, does it makes sense?
the scenario i was working on, with two sync call, was goin into time out stage and surely performance was affected...
wot do u say on the mentioned scenario?
regards,
Vishalrahul,
i did try the same but ther seems to b error on the receive step...
i presume, it had to b receive (sync) and then the send async and then the receive async and the closing the send sync bridge...
correct me if im wrong..
or else if i take the request of sender rfc in an interface to make it to b async then use the receive step?
but in tht case my data itself was not passin... a dump on the report sayin,
"call to messaging system failed: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException"...
regards,
Vishal -
Multimapping(File to RFC) using BPM...issue!!!
Hi
Am working on following scenario:
#Two request files merged to map to RFC request ( 2:1mapping )
RFC response is split into two response messages( 1:2 ).
I have done the whole thing in BPM that looks somewhat like this :
Fork(Rec1 , Rec2)-> Transformation1(2:1 map) -> Send(Synchronous BAPI call) -> transformation(1:2 map) -> send(Response 1) -> send(Response 2)
1st part i.e File Merge(2:1) works fine and the request is formed as desired. Next step when synchronous call is made to the RFC the response recieved is where i am facing issues. I dont get the expected response and eventually the following steps fail.
When tested the same RFC(BAPI_SALESORDER_SIMULATE ) in tx SE37 with same data it works fine.
But when same data is sent from XI it returns a error message in place of the response.
Error Message states "Please enter SoldToParty or ShipToParty Number" .
Irony is sold-to-party is sent in the request message and can be seen in payload in monitoring.
Any kinda help is appreciated !!!> 1. Make sure that bapi commits...there will be a check box option in RFC receiver CC side for this.
>2. Make sure that Sold to party/bill to party field is of 10 char before passing it to SAP.
@ Santosh :
I checked the tab in CC but still the same issue...Do we need to add something to the Name/Value section below that?
And yeah I am sending 10 digits only..
BTW do we need something additional when we call a BAPI from XI apart from the data we normally use in tx SE37.
Can my Configuration be a problem?
For this synchronous call in BPM I have created :
a) 2 interface determinations...One from BPM to ECC and another from ECC to BPM. But both are without any operation mapping as the message types are same & both are synchronous...
b) 1 receiver determination i.e : from BPM to ECC.
c) 1 receiver agreement. -
File to RFC with multiple records using BPM Scenario Error...!!!
Hello Guru's,
I have done the File to RFC with multiple records using BPM scenario as per the Materiel available in the sdn.sap. This involves BAPI (BAPI_MATERIEL_AVAILABILITY). I have done exactly the same what is their in the materiel. SXI_CACHE is also giving return value " 0 ". File is getting deleted from the source directory, but no file in target directory. SXMB_MONI is also showing no error (black Flag). BPM is also error free. Checked the interfaces also.
Can any one tell me what mistake would i have done.
Thanks in advance.Hi,
There is one similar discussion I found,
FTP TO RFC using BPM
Thanks
Swarup -
** How to deliver multiple files using BPM (From RFC output)
Hi Friends,
I am doing File-RFC-File scenario using BPM. I am using BAPI_SFLIGHT_GETLIST as my RFC (Standard RFC). If we execute this RFC, it will return the results in tables form. Assume that, the inputs to RFC is like below.
FromCountryKey : US
FromCity: NEW YORK
ToCountryKey: DE
ToCity: FRANKFURT.
The outputs from the RFC is like below.
26 Entries
CAR
CONN
FLDATE
AIR
AIR
DEPTIME
SEATSMAX
SEATSOCC
|
DL
0106
19.05.2008
JFK
FRA
19:35:00
280
266
UA
3516
20.05.2008
JFK
FRA
16:20:00
380
364
LH
0401
23.05.2008
JFK
FRA
18:30:00
220
209
LH
0401
28.05.2008
JFK
FRA
18:30:00
220
208
UA
3516
28.05.2008
JFK
FRA
16:20:00
380
367
DL
0106
16.06.2008
JFK
FRA
19:35:00
280
261
UA
3516
17.06.2008
JFK
FRA
16:20:00
380
357
LH
0401
20.06.2008
JFK
FRA
18:30:00
220
213
DL
0106
14.07.2008
JFK
FRA
19:35:00
280
1
UA
3516
15.07.2008
JFK
FRA
16:20:00
380
86
LH
0401
18.07.2008
JFK
FRA
18:30:00
220
123
DL
0106
11.08.2008
JFK
FRA
19:35:00
280
56
UA
3516
12.08.2008
JFK
FRA
16:20:00
380
67
LH
0401
15.08.2008
JFK
FRA
18:30:00
220
114
DL
0106
08.09.2008
JFK
FRA
19:35:00
280
0
UA
3516
09.09.2008
JFK
FRA
16:20:00
380
164
LH
0401
12.09.2008
JFK
FRA
18:30:00
220
64
DL
0106
06.10.2008
JFK
FRA
19:35:00
280
80
UA
3516
07.10.2008
JFK
FRA
16:20:00
380
8
LH
0401
10.10.2008
JFK
FRA
18:30:00
220
16
DL
0106
03.11.2008
JFK
FRA
19:35:00
280
11
UA
3516
04.11.2008
JFK
FRA
16:20:00
380
33
LH
0401
07.11.2008
JFK
FRA
18:30:00
220
53
DL
0106
01.12.2008
JFK
FRA
19:35:00
280
0
UA
3516
02.12.2008
JFK
FRA
16:20:00
380
45
LH
0401
05.12.2008
JFK
FRA
18:30:00
220
25
|
We need to create output file for each record. In this case, the system should generate 26 output files.
I imported the RFC and created the required interfaces and designed BPM also.
Start --> Receive step --> Synchronous Send --> Asynchronous Send
But, I stuck in how to deliver each record to the output file from BPM.
Any idea, friends. (like using BPM Multi-line option. or 'Receiver From' property in the Send Step)
Kindly help me friends to solve this issue.
Thanking you.
Kind Regards,
Jeg P.Hi
You can do it by creating one another message interface having structure same as your table.
What you have to do is create a mapping in such a way that for each record in table one message(newly created) must be created.
Use that mapping in an interface mapping, remember occurence of target message should be 0..Unbounded both in message mapping and interface mapping.
Now create one single line message and one multiline message in BPM for newly created message.Use transformation step with new interface mapping, mention source(RFC response) and target message(use multiline element of new message) for the transformation step.
Use send step inside a block,set block mode to "forEach", and attach new message to that send step.
Use multiline and single element of new message in the property window of block.
Now your BPM will look like
Start ---> Receiver ---> Synchronous send ---> Transformation ---> Block ---> Async Send(within block)
I think in this way you can implement what you want.
Regards
Sami
Reward points if helpful. -
File to RFC Multiline using BPM
Hi Experts,
I am working on File To RFC Multiple Records using BPM. I am getting the below error. When i am activating Integration Process. I got the error as Element should not return Multiline Value. So i have changed the Message Mapping Occurance in Signature Tab to O to Unbounded. I am getting the below error in SXMB_MONI. Please check and guide me how to proceed further.
Regards,
GIRIDHAR
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- <!--
Call Adapter
-->
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="BPE_ADAPTER">UNKNOWN_MESSAGE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:Stack>No object type found for the message. Check that the corresponding process is activated</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>Hi Giridhar,
Check below thread:
BPE_ADAPTER UNKNOWN_MESSAGE
Regards,
Krupa -
Help SOAP to RFC Scenario using BPM (Synchronous communication)
Hi,
I am doing a scenario from SOAP to RFC scenario(Synchronous communication). Here I am creating a PM Notification in the SAP system through a webservice.
I am using three BAPI'S here,
1. BAPI_ALM_NOTIF_CREATE
2. BAPI_ALM_NOTIF_SAVE
3. BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT
I am successful in calling the first BAPI from the Web Service. For this I have not used BPM. But to commit the transaction(PM notification in this case), I have to execute the other two BAPI's as well. I have to pass the output of first BAPI to the second BAPI and then execute the 2nd BAPI. And finally have to execute the 3rd BAPI. FYI, 3rd BAPI is not dependent on any output. It has to be executed independently after execution of the first two BAPI's.
How can I execute this scenario? Do I have to use BPM? If yes please let me know the steps in detail. I have not done any BPM scenario till now. So please answer me in detail.
Thanks in Advance,
Vijay
p.s. reward points are mustHi Vijay,
Yes, You will indeed need a BPM in this case...
Based on my understanding of the Scenario u have explained, here are the steps that would be needed.
1. Receive With the Sync-Async Bridge open.
2. Transformation Step (Between the source Request and The BAPI_ALM_NOTIF_CREATE Request)
3. Send Synchronous
4. Fork
5. In one Branch of the fork - Transformation (Between the BAPI_ALM_NOTIF_CREATE Response and API_ALM_NOTIF_SAVE Request)
6. In the other branch of the fork - Transformation (Between a Dummy Source and the BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT Request)
7. Send Synchronous (to make the 2nd BAPI Call)
6. Transformation ( BAPI_ALM_NOTIF_SAVE Response and the source Response)
7. Send Asynchronous (to make the 3rd BAPI call)
8. Send the Source Response and close the Sync-Async Bridge.
There might be alternative ways also of doing it...
Also a better design would be to take care of the 2nd and the 3rd BAPI call within the code of the 1st RFC Function Module.
Regards,
Abhy Thomas -
hey guys
is a File-To-RFC scenario possible without using BPM? i have gone through the blog by Arpit Seth ( /people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit ) but it uses BPM.
i am new to XI and not very comfortable with BPM.
please let me know if BPM is the only way out or are there some other methods too.
Also under what circumstances one should use BPM?
thanx in advance.
aamir suhailHi,
it's a standard non BPM scenario
(you can find many weblogs like this)
the only different thing is the RFC signature import
(inside repository)
and the use of different channels (file and RFC)
you can find many examples in my XI FAQ
(document section)
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a> -
File to RFC scenario using BPM : a synchronous one
Hi All
I am doing File>RFC>File scenario using BPM with help of the blog
RFC Scenario using BPM --Starter Kit
here everything is explained but i am getting error while the processing of BPM part
Input file is being picked (this part is success) but rest BPM and response i am not getting back in .
interface names
filereq_MI >Filetoabstract_MI>Sync_MI>RFCtoabstract_MI>Fileres_MI
(abstract means its an abstract interface)
i have configuered the Integration process as follows
Start>Recieve>synch_send>send>end
step : Recieve
mode : asynch
message:Filetoabstract_MI
step : synch_send
mode : synch
synch interface : synch_send
req message:Filetoabstract_MI
res message : RFCtoabstract_MI
step : send
mode : asynch
message:RFCtoabstract_MI
and i have given interface mapping during second (synch_send) step but here mapping is giving problem its showing exception error during mapping
error is there
1) Integration process ---> file
2) Integration process-->R/3 systemHi,
Configure the Integration Engine According to this Blog and Trigger the Process again
Configuration of a Central Integration Server
Regards
Seshagiri -
Choosing Receiver Interface (IDoc or RFC) without using BPM
Hi,
We have a scenario wherein the receiver interface (either IDoc or RFC) must be dynamically determined at runtime based on the source message. I've tried using Multi-Mapping but this did not work since IDoc and RFC interfaces are not on the same Adapter Engine.
How do I configure this scenario without using BPM?
Thanks,
FrancisHi,
>That was my first solution but it did not work since it seems that conditions only work for determining the Operation Mapping to use for the same Receiver interfaces.
not true - not only Operation Mapping but also receiver agreement
so the receiver's channel
>I was misled into thinking that we could use it to dynamically determine the receiver interface.
but you can do it over there
intrface determination can be used for pseudo receiver determination too
so you can have one interface that either goes to one
channel or the other (within the same receiver)
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk -
Send multiple records to rfc without using BPM
Dear Experts,
Could you please help on the following scenario.
I need to send multiple customer master data records from a file to rfc without using BPM.
The following is the mapping i am using
source Target( RFC)
====== =============
Tree occurance type Tree occurance
cust_mt 1..1
customer 0..unbound -
> ztest_cust( rfc ) 1..1
cname 1..1 -
> cname 0..1
cno 1..1 -
> cno 0..1
bank -
> bank 0..1
item : 0..unbound
code -
> code 0..1
name -
> name 0..1
location -
> location 0..1
1. Multiple banks possible for one customer
2. Multiple customers possible in datafile from mdm
Problem 1:Only one customer record from file is being sent to RFC thouth many records are in the file, the second, third .. and so on records not being sent to rfc.
Problem 2:
if add o.. unbound for the rfc occurance, <messages>,<message1> tags are getting added in message mapping, and no single customer record sent to rfc..
Your help is rewarded with good points.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks.
sravya.Hi VJ,
Thank you for the immediate reply.
one more thing, when i tried to change the occurences of ztest_cust( rfc) to 0..unbound,
I am not seeing the occurances updated in the imported rfc structure.
The following is the wsdl for rfc, could you please help me to add occurances 0..unbound.
Thanks a lot.
sraya.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<wsdl:definitions xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:rfc="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions" name="ZTEST_CUST" targetNamespace="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions">
<wsdl:documentation>
test for mdm
</wsdl:documentation>
<wsdl:types>
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions" targetNamespace="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions">
<xsd:element name="ZTEST_CUST">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:all>
<xsd:element name="CNAME" minOccurs="0">
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:maxLength value="10" />
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="CNO" minOccurs="0">
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:maxLength value="10" />
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="BANK" minOccurs="0">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="item" type="ZST_CUST" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:all>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="ZTEST_CUST.Response">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:all>
<xsd:element name="BANK" minOccurs="0">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="item" type="ZST_CUST" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:all>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:complexType name="ZST_CUST">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="CODE" minOccurs="0">
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:maxLength value="60" />
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="NAME" minOccurs="0">
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:maxLength value="60" />
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="LOCATION" minOccurs="0">
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:maxLength value="60" />
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:schema>
</wsdl:types>
<wsdl:message name="ZTEST_CUST.Input">
<wsdl:part name="parameters" element="rfc:ZTEST_CUST" />
</wsdl:message>
<wsdl:message name="ZTEST_CUST.Output">
<wsdl:part name="parameters" element="rfc:ZTEST_CUST.Response" />
</wsdl:message>
<wsdl:portType name="ZTEST_CUST.PortType">
<wsdl:operation name="ZTEST_CUST">
<wsdl:input message="rfc:ZTEST_CUST.Input" />
<wsdl:output message="rfc:ZTEST_CUST.Output" />
</wsdl:operation>
</wsdl:portType>
<wsdl:binding name="ZTEST_CUST.SAPBinding" type="rfc:ZTEST_CUST.PortType">
<rfc:binding style="rfc" />
<rfc:type name="ZST_CUST">
<ifr:container xmlns:ifr="urn:sap-com:ifr:v2:metamodel" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<ifr:descriptor>
<ifr:description language="EN">
test
</ifr:description>
</ifr:descriptor>
<ifr:properties>
<ifr:sourceSystem />
<ifr:sourceClient>
020
</ifr:sourceClient>
<ifr:release>
640
</ifr:release>
<ifr:category>
structure
</ifr:category>
<ifr:unicode1>
true
</ifr:unicode1>
<ifr:unicode2>
true
</ifr:unicode2>
<ifr:isFlatStructure>
true
</ifr:isFlatStructure>
</ifr:properties>
<ifr:definition>
<ifr:internalLength1>
180
</ifr:internalLength1>
<ifr:internalLength2>
360
</ifr:internalLength2>
<ifr:fields>
<ifr:field name="CODE" category="simple">
<ifr:descriptor />
<ifr:properties>
<ifr:helpValuesSupported>
false
</ifr:helpValuesSupported>
<ifr:offset1>
0
</ifr:offset1>
<ifr:offset2>
0
</ifr:offset2>
</ifr:properties>
<ifr:definition>
<ifr:scalarType>
<ifr:definition>
<ifr:type>
CHAR
</ifr:type>
<ifr:abapType>
C
</ifr:abapType>
<ifr:length>
60
</ifr:length>
<ifr:internalLength1>
60
</ifr:internalLength1>
<ifr:internalLength2>
120
</ifr:internalLength2>
<ifr:decimals>
0
</ifr:decimals>
</ifr:definition>
</ifr:scalarType>
</ifr:definition>
</ifr:field>
<ifr:field name="NAME" category="simple">
<ifr:descriptor />
<ifr:properties>
<ifr:helpValuesSupported>
false
</ifr:helpValuesSupported>
<ifr:offset1>
60
</ifr:offset1>
<ifr:offset2>
120
</ifr:offset2>
</ifr:properties>
<ifr:definition>
<ifr:scalarType>
<ifr:definition>
<ifr:type>
CHAR
</ifr:type>
<ifr:abapType>
C
</ifr:abapType>
<ifr:length>
60
</ifr:length>
<ifr:internalLength1>
60
</ifr:internalLength1>
<ifr:internalLength2>
120
</ifr:internalLength2>
<ifr:decimals>
0
</ifr:decimals>
</ifr:definition>
</ifr:scalarType>
</ifr:definition>
</ifr:field>
<ifr:field name="LOCATION" category="simple">
<ifr:descriptor />
<ifr:properties>
<ifr:helpValuesSupported>
false
</ifr:helpValuesSupported>
<ifr:offset1>
120
</ifr:offset1>
<ifr:offset2>
240
</ifr:offset2>
</ifr:properties>
<ifr:definition>
<ifr:scalarType>
<ifr:definition>
<ifr:type>
CHAR
</ifr:type>
<ifr:abapType>
C
</ifr:abapType>
<ifr:length>
60
</ifr:length>
<ifr:internalLength1>
60
</ifr:internalLength1>
<ifr:internalLength2>
120
</ifr:internalLength2>
<ifr:decimals>
0
</ifr:decimals>
</ifr:definition>
</ifr:scalarType>
</ifr:definition>
</ifr:field>
</ifr:fields>
</ifr:definition>
</ifr:container>
</rfc:type>
<wsdl:operation name="ZTEST_CUST">
<ifr:container xmlns:ifr="urn:sap-com:ifr:v2:metamodel" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<ifr:descriptor>
<ifr:description language="EN">
test for mdm
</ifr:description>
</ifr:descriptor>
<ifr:properties>
<ifr:sourceSystem />
<ifr:sourceClient>
020
</ifr:sourceClient>
<ifr:release>
640
</ifr:release>
<ifr:package>
$TMP
</ifr:package>
<ifr:akhNode />
<ifr:released>
external
</ifr:released>
<ifr:outbound>
false
</ifr:outbound>
<ifr:synchronous>
true
</ifr:synchronous>
<ifr:asynchronous>
false
</ifr:asynchronous>
<ifr:unicode1>
true
</ifr:unicode1>
<ifr:unicode2>
true
</ifr:unicode2>
</ifr:properties>
<ifr:definition>
<ifr:parameters>
<ifr:parameter name="CNAME">
<ifr:descriptor>
<ifr:description language="EN">
Character Field Length = 10
</ifr:description>
</ifr:descriptor>
<ifr:definition>
<ifr:scalarType name="CHAR10">
<ifr:properties>
<ifr:helpValuesSupported>
false
</ifr:helpValuesSupported>
<ifr:fixedValuesListDefined>
false
</ifr:fixedValuesListDefined>
<ifr:mixedCaseSupported>
false
</ifr:mixedCaseSupported>
<ifr:signedNumber>
false
</ifr:signedNumber>
</ifr:properties>
<ifr:definition>
<ifr:type>
CHAR
</ifr:type>
<ifr:abapType>
C
</ifr:abapType>
<ifr:length>
10
</ifr:length>
<ifr:internalLength1>
10
</ifr:internalLength1>
<ifr:internalLength2>
20
</ifr:internalLength2>
<ifr:decimals>
0
</ifr:decimals>
<ifr:outputLength>
10
</ifr:outputLength>
</ifr:definition>
</ifr:scalarType>
</ifr:definition>
<ifr:properties>
<ifr:direction>
in
</ifr:direction>
<ifr:class>
import
</ifr:class>
<ifr:type>
scalar
</ifr:type>
<ifr:optional>
true
</ifr:optional>
<ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
true
</ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
</ifr:properties>
</ifr:parameter>
<ifr:parameter name="CNO">
<ifr:descriptor>
<ifr:description language="EN">
Character Field Length = 10
</ifr:description>
</ifr:descriptor>
<ifr:definition>
<ifr:scalarType name="CHAR10">
<ifr:properties>
<ifr:helpValuesSupported>
false
</ifr:helpValuesSupported>
<ifr:fixedValuesListDefined>
false
</ifr:fixedValuesListDefined>
<ifr:mixedCaseSupported>
false
</ifr:mixedCaseSupported>
<ifr:signedNumber>
false
</ifr:signedNumber>
</ifr:properties>
<ifr:definition>
<ifr:type>
CHAR
</ifr:type>
<ifr:abapType>
C
</ifr:abapType>
<ifr:length>
10
</ifr:length>
<ifr:internalLength1>
10
</ifr:internalLength1>
<ifr:internalLength2>
20
</ifr:internalLength2>
<ifr:decimals>
0
</ifr:decimals>
<ifr:outputLength>
10
</ifr:outputLength>
</ifr:definition>
</ifr:scalarType>
</ifr:definition>
<ifr:properties>
<ifr:direction>
in
</ifr:direction>
<ifr:class>
import
</ifr:class>
<ifr:type>
scalar
</ifr:type>
<ifr:optional>
true
</ifr:optional>
<ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
true
</ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
</ifr:properties>
</ifr:parameter>
<ifr:parameter name="BANK">
<ifr:descriptor>
<ifr:description language="EN">
test bank type
</ifr:description>
</ifr:descriptor>
<ifr:definition>
<ifr:complexType xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" name="ZST_CUST" type="structure" xlink:role="type" xlink:href="/Content?TYPE=type&NAME=ZST_CUST" />
</ifr:definition>
<ifr:properties>
<ifr:direction>
inout
</ifr:direction>
<ifr:class>
tables
</ifr:class>
<ifr:type>
structure
</ifr:type>
<ifr:optional>
true
</ifr:optional>
<ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
true
</ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
</ifr:properties>
</ifr:parameter>
</ifr:parameters>
</ifr:definition>
</ifr:container>
</wsdl:operation>
</wsdl:binding>
</wsdl:definitions> -
Problem with File RFC File scenario without using BPM
Hi all,
I am trying a File RFC File scenario without using BPM with the help of the following thread:
File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.
The XI system is PI 7.0 sp 12. When I am trying to acheive the above scenario, I am getting wierd results i.e., when I observe in SXI_MONITOR, the message is showing as processed successfully, but when I watch the message status in communication channel monitoring, I am getting the following error:
"Attempt to process file failed with com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.CPAException: Couldn't retrieve inbound binding for the given P/S/A values: FP=;TP=;FS=DEV120;TS=Test_Service;AN=MI_Invoice;ANS=urn:sap.com:test;"
I am not able to understand what the problem is. By the way, one more thing, is, I have kept the File processing mode as "Delete" in the sender file adapter. But the file is not getting deleted. I think the reason could be because of the above error.
Can any body help me out in getting my problem resolved?
Thanks,
Adithya KCPA Cache Refresh from the Adapter Engine To trigger a cache refresh from the individual Adapter Framework, open a browser window and enter the following
URL: http://<host>:<port>/CPACache/refresh?mode=<b>delta|full</b>
The Monitoring url is like this: http://<host>:<port>/CPACache
Thanks & Regards,
Farooq. -
MessageExpiredException error in JDBC - RFC scenario using BPM.
<b>Scenario:</b> JDBC( Asynch)- RFC( Synch)- JDBC (Asyc)
We are using XI to read oracle table records to insert the records in R/3 and after the insert in R/3 we return a sap code to update in oracle db.
When we try to process 10 or less rows from db, the process is successfully running, but when we try processing more records we are getting the following error. We tried increase the timeout setting in RFC adapter as per the SAP note and forum.
<u>Detailed error: </u>
<b>com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.MessageExpiredException: Message 443jdjsd-e432-2ec8-e100-000046eb2e5f(INBOUND) expired.</b>
If I use correlation in asynchronous RFC instead of synchronous RFC, will this solve the problem or is there any better solution for this ?
Any useful steps to change the synchronous RFC to asynchronous RFC in BPM would be great.
Thanks
SteveHi,
<i>1. Any suggestions to meet this requirement in XI ?</i>
>>>One option is using ABAP Proxy . Instead of calling Sync. RFC, call synchronous Proxy. So your client proxy, should receive all 200-300 rows at a time, and inside the proxy, and call the RFC. Once all the reocrds are processed, send the response back to BPM
You can try out this.
I think, probably you may require to do looping for each Row.i.e For each row the call the RFC.. As of now try to go with Proxy.
Also try to findout, why the RFC is taking that much of time.. So check for the provision of tuning in the RFC side..
Hope this helps,
regards,
Moorthy
Message was edited by: Krishna Moorthy P
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do I separate my children's giftcards when using my account?
I gave my two kids (ages 9 and 14) ipods for Christmas. When setting up the ipods they used my apple id because the ipod told them they were too young to have their own. I also gave my kids gift cards to the itunes store. How can my kids share my
-
Oracle UCM Installation Supported Versions
I am installing Oracle UCM suite in Windows 7 64bit-OS, can anyone say which is the release version to download the following products oracle DB version? RCU version? UCM version? Experts please advice as there is a confusion with versions and releas
-
Financial Reports 9.3.1.3 Client
I am having problems connecting FR Client (9.3.1.3) with FR Server (9.3.0.1). Is it possible to connect to the server with a newer version of the client. I get an "Unknown Error" Brian Chow
-
Logo and bold character in message
Hi, I am generating a popup on click of a button. I am inserting a message by concatenating two variables as shown below. CONCATENATE 'Material' wa_register-vbak-vbeln 'is created on' lv_date into lv_info. 1.When this is m
-
Equipment as PRT's during Production Order Confirmation
Hi Gurus, During Production Order confirmation I cannot see whether I have consumed equipments as PRT which are attached to operation. The operation is showing CNF status as well the Order. How can I see whether which Equipment was used for each oper