Fuji IS Pro P\profile question...

I use LR3 and have a Fuji IS Pro and shoot raw. For those that don't know the IS Pro is basically a Fuji S5 Pro setup for forensic work. It has slightly customized firmware and the hot mirror has been replaced with optical glass to make it a full spectrum camera so it records from UV up into IR to around 1000nm.
If I put a UV-IR cut filter on the lens than it is basically the same as a Fuji S5 Pro. Is there any way to get LR3 to allow me to use the Fuji S5 Pro profiles on the raw files from the IS Pro?
Thanks,
Shawn

There is a built-in lens profile that is always applied and cannot be turned off.  The vignetting and chromatic aberration were and continue to be corrected by this profile, as they have always been.  There is a new information box in ACR 8.4 and presumably soon in LR 5.4 that indicates this correction is being applied.
Additionally, I enabled the new external lens profile.  The vignetting and geometric distortion were corrected by this profile.
So the vignetting is being corrected twice, once by the internal profile and once by the external profile.  I have let Eric Chan from Adobe this is happening and he has acknowledged he’ll be looking into it.
Until Adobe fixes this double correction, the Vignetting slider needs to be set to 0 when the external lens profile is enabled to turn off the external profile’s extra vignetting correction.

Similar Messages

  • Develop module, camera calibration, Fuji X Pro 1 Camera Profiles question

    In Lightroom 5.3 with camera raw 8.3, for my Fuji X Pro 1 lightroom is only showing "Adobe Standard."
    Is there a way to have it recognize the various shooting modes on the camera?
    The initial raw preview looks awesome, but as soon as lightroom builds a preview, it goes back to the standard flat and dull image that will require tweaks.
    Surely I am just overlooking something?

    You’re not overlooking anything.
    Adobe doesn’t recognize shooting modes of any cameras; however, for Canon, Nikon and now Olympus, Adobe supplies “Camera Match” profiles for some theoretical shooting modes, that are closer to the camera JPGs than Adobe Standard but are still just approximations.   Adobe has no way of knowing exactly what other companies are doing for their raw-to-jpg conversions so it’s a bit of reverse-engineering to get what they have, now, anyway.
    Fuji X-trans cameras are particularly troublesome for Adobe because of the novel camera sensor layout and I wouldn’t expect Adobe to spend even more time doing custom X-trans things unless the camera’s become a popular professional platform.  Somehow I doubt that so don’t hold your breath.
    You can change the Develop Defaults for your camera if you want things to be different than the initial Adobe-factory-defaults look.  Experiment with applying your tweaked settings as a Develop preset during Import, first, while you perfect the new Defaults, look.
    You can create your own color profiles for your camera if you’re willing to spend the $100 on a Color Checker standard color target.
    Basically don’t both setting things on the camera to affect how your raws are developed in LR because they won’t translate across, except WB.  Spend your time learning what to do to get LR to make things how you want them with the least effort.

  • How to add profiles for older camera and older lenses, Fuji S3 Pro, Nikon D90, Nikon 28-85

    How can I obtain and install profile for a Fuji S3 Pro and Nikon D200
    How can I obtain and install profile for a Nikon 28-85 AF
    A bit of a newbie , just retired

    About Lens Profiles:
    They are different for Raw and JPEG. Sometimes a profile is only available for Raw, sometimes for JPEG, sometimes for both, sometimes for neither. If it is available, it can be found by searching in the Profile tab of the Lens Corrections panel. If it doesn't show available when searching here, you can go to the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader and see if another user, like yourself, has created one. If not, you can download the Adobe Lens Profile Creator tool and make one yourself.  See the link below.
    Photoshop Help | Digital Negative (DNG)

  • Help!  Fuji S5 Pro DNG's don't work with lens profile creator

    I wondered if anyone could help me sort this out.  I've shot a series of test images with my Fuji S5 Pro in Raw + Jpeg format.  I converted the Raw files to DNG format using Adobe DNG converter (camera raw 5.4 later, jpeg preview medium, with and without original raw embedded).  When I run the jpegs through the software everything works fine.  When I run the DNG's through, however, I am unable to select geometric correction as an option, and the grid detection does not work.  The grid always appears shifted 50% down and about 25% to the right.  I'm wondering if this could be a function of Fuji's unique sensor.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!
    --Mark

    Hi, Mark
    When I run the DNG's through, however, I am unable to select geometric correction as an option, and the grid detection does not work.
    The Geometric Correction is selected by default, do you mean this option is unchecked? Could you please send me a screenshot and a DNG  file to me: [email protected]?
    Thanks,
    Ping

  • 4.4 update doesnt show the Fuji x pro 1 camera for lens adjustments etc

    Looking forward to this update because i use a Fuji X pro 1 and I had read that lightroom 4.4 now supports this camera and sensor.
    However after updating all I get in the Lens adjustment under Fuji is the Fuji x100 which has been their for some time.
    The exif info is showing the correct camera and lens used etc.
    I have tried uninstalling and then manually removing any left over files and folders with no luck.
    Do i have to install support for this camera as an addon?
    Also if i look in the lightroom folder Camera profiles/camera it only lists Canon, Nikon and Sony
    Any ideas.?
    Thanks all.
    Mark C
    Message was edited by: Mark Candlin

    The location you describe looking in has camera-match raw-sensor profiles for the three brands you mention plus a few for Leica and Pentax, I think.
    The Adobe Standard peer folder of the Camera folder you mention has the raw-sensor profiles for each camera that Adobe supports which and is where you’ll find your Fuji raw-sensor profile.
    Your question seems to be about a lens-profile, though, not the raw-sensor profile and those profiles are up one more folder and down into the LensProfiles folder area.
    There aren’t that many brands of camera-lens combinations supported by Adobe and the X Pro 1 is one that isn’t one that is supported by Fuji, and just the X100 is, which you’ve already discovered.
    There are additional profiles that have been created by users such as yourself and published for other users to use that can be downloaded by the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader; however, there are none for the X Pro 1, there, either, so you’ll either need to create your own lens profile using the Adobe Lens Profile Creator, or wait for another user to create a lens profile, or do without.  This is the normal situation for most non-high-end cameras.
    Adobe pays people to do things and prioritizes tasks, pruning ones that are “less necessary” or “less beneficial” using whatever criteria they have.  This is normal in a market-driven economy where there is always a balance between price and service.  If LR was twice as expensive, then Adobe might be able to provide more profiles, but there would be less Fuji owners buying it due to the higher price, right?  If the world economy picks up and more people buy Adobe products, assuming people still use PCs and Macs and not tablets, then there may be more money to throw at things like profiles for camera-xyz.

  • Fuji X-Pro 1 Raw file processing updated in 4.2?

    With the release of 4.2 now supporting Fuji X-E1, does anyone know if this update fixes Fuji X-Pro 1 raw files?

    I come across these sorts of post all the time while searching up information on a particular subject. You get some big shot in the community throwing a non-helpful reply out there.
    The big shot with their non-helpful reply always seemed a bit… I don’t know, careless, smug. A lot of times I’m trying to research a subject and the reply comes across a lot like, well, I know it and so should you. Not always the case though. (In my job I’m asked a lot of simple questions, what I consider obvious. Things that are in the manual. I never brush people off so hastily though. I sit and help them because I don’t know… that seems like the proper thing to do)
    Perhaps it’s just me, that I don’t think it’s appropriate to just brush someone off so easily. Perhaps it’s in my nature to put a thoughtful reply up. That even if I don’t fully understand the subject, I’d take the time to do a little research and see what I can find to help someone. I don’t subscribe to the mentality of just telling someone to “Google it”. I understand that Ian didn’t tell OP to google it, but I feel his replies are based in that same mind set.
    It’s not just about brushing people off because they ask a question you feel they can answer themselves. I understand there’s a lot of information out there to those that know how to seek it. Not everyone does though and it’s wrong to assume as such. It’s better as a community to help people, even if their questions seem straight forward.
    All I’ve found concerning raw files for the X-E1 so far are lab pictures. They don’t really correlate that well to real world performance and images. Though they may exhibit some of the problems, it doesn’t feel like I’m getting a clear image of the situation. Most of the threads I’ve found on the subject only have one image propped up as an example (Typically an image I don’t consider to be all that well shot, so what I can judge from it is still debatable)
    Plus, I’d want other people’s experiences. Especially as a potential owner. I can only gather so much from a few sparse raw files.
    Lastly, I’m not in a position at the moment to download random raw files and put them through lightroom. Even if I have a few moments to share, I’m not at a computer where I have access to lightroom/can install lightroom trial. This will change, in time, obviously, but at the moment this is the spot I’m in.
    Sometimes there are problems like this, but at some point they get fixed. It can be difficult to sort through months of post of people complaining before you find the post where they say it’s fixed. People tend to quiet down after problems are fixed, so mostly what you still come across is the hordes of people that complained about it being broken.
    Dog me if you’d like over the fact that I replied to a post that was a few months old. I don’t care. Obviously it reached someone.
    P.S. Sometimes it’s really nice to talk to another human being when you have a problem or question. I think a lot of people are conditioned to do that. Questions may not always be necessary, but that doesn’t mean they should be shrugged off. There was a time where we didn’t have this magical land of porn and cat photos and in those days it was quite acceptable to ask each other questions, even on simple subjects.

  • Raw conversion for fuji x pro 1

    Hi All,
    just a couple of quick questions; Does anybody know if Adobe is hard at work making a raw converter for the fuji x pro 1. I understand that the sensor array is totally different so I'm not looking for miracles.
    The other question I have is; If I shoot in raw and jpg w/ a Fuji x-pro-1 will Lightroom accept both files even thought it will not (at this time) convert the raw file?
    Thanks for the help
    Mike

    hehe.. yesterday before i went to bed i thought i have to ask this today.
    im also very interested to hear if adobe is working on a "trans-x" sensor demosaicing process.
    i think it is more difficult to reverse engineer then a normal bayer sensor?
    i wonder if you need to know the exact pixel layout of the sensor. 
    as i understand it they use random 6x6 pixel arrangements?

  • Fuji X Pro 1 Raw Files

    Hi - Does anyone know when Aperture will be upgraded to support RAW files from the new Fuji X Pro 1??

    1)  This is an extremely common question here.  Learning to search the forums would be a good skill.
    2)  Nobody here knows an answer to this question.

  • ACR 4.1 only picking up 6M pixels from Fuji S5 Pro.

    I have read that quite a few people are happily opening their raw files from a Fuji S5 Pro with ACR 4 & 4.1, but have any of you managed to get it to recognize the full 12M pixels. At first I thought it was me, new camera & all that, but then I opened a raw file in iPhoto & there it was in full resolution.
    I'm guessing that ACR is not able to see the S pixel data in the image & is therefor only opening the remaining 6M R pixels, or visa versa.
    I am using a MacPro & G5 with 10.4.10 & CS3 Design Premium with all the updates.
    Thanks

    The S and R sensors are not there to increase the resolution, but the dynamic range. You can select the number of pixels that you will export as they are interpolated anyways. (Click on the hyperlink at the bottom of ACR windows for workflow options)

  • HT3946 Raw processing for Fuji X1 Pro

    Raw processing for Fuji X1 Pro - when can we expect it to be supported in Aperture

    This is a user forum, so none of is will know officially; you probably have found already the list of raw formats supported by Aperture: http://www.apple.com/aperture/specs/raw.html
    Apple has been rather quick with adding raw support for pro cameras lately, so keep your fingers crossed.
    Use the feedback form in the Aperture " - menu > Provide feedback to Apple" to ask for speedy raw support.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • Photoshop elements 10 support for fuji x pro 1 raf files

    How do I open fuji raf files from a fuji x pro 1 camera in photoshop elements 10? I have downloaded the camera raw 7.1 plugin update and tried to run it but it tells me it is not appropriate and will not install.

    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/camera-raw-compatible-applications.html
    Mylenium

  • HT4757 Fuji X Pro 1 Raw compatibility, Is aperture working on a fix for this??

    I just got the new Fuji X-pro 1 a month ago and am waiting for a patch so I can use camera raw...Is anyone else out there in the same situation? Have I missed something??

    I found this in an older post, although I didn't hear anything from support.
    +I have heard from tech support from Apple. This is a defect in iTunes. There is nothing you (we) can do to fix it. We will have to wait for iTunes to release a fix. In the meantime, to get a refund, when you get your invoice from Apple for the rental, simply click on the "report a problem" link in the email and follow all instructions. Your money will be refunded. FYI this problem is occurring on Mac as well as Windows.+
    *If this is true I really hope this issue is fixed before the release of iTunes 7.7!*

  • I've got LR5.7 and Camera Raw 8.7 and my Fuji X-Pro 1 files are not recognized. How to make good ? Thank you

    I've got LR5.7 and Camera Raw 8.7 and my Fuji X-Pro 1 files are not recognized. How to make good ? Thank you

    Do you get an error message? What - exactly - does it say?

  • Fuji S5 Pro and .RAF support in LR2.0?

    I've read all the messages relating to .raf files and the product requests, but there aren't any posts to say whether the Fuji RAW file type with its extended dynamic range is better supported in LR2.0 Does anyone have any experience of this yet?
    Cheers!

    Hi Steve,
    I use the Fuji S5 Pro and the S2 with LR2 and C1. I mainly shoot in RAW with D-Range set to 400%. Its hard to say if its better supported under LR2 than LR1.4, the extended DR is there and I have recovered highlights far in excess than other pro cameras I've used. C1 gives better colour and for the little colour work I do then I generally use C1. Most of my work is monochrome and LR comes into its own here with much more flexible conversion. My site www.angryskies.co.uk gives you an idea of what I do. As I generally shoot in high contrast situations (by choice), a BIG problem with other pro cameras I've used, with the S5, HDR or the use of ND grads is a thing of the past. It works really well.

  • Formato RAW de Fuji S3 Pro

    Tengo una Fuji S3 Pro e intento usar el "monstruo" de CS2, pero NO soy capaz de abrir un archivo raw de mi camara (extension .RAF). Le he instalado la ultima version del plugin "Camera Raw", exactamente la 3.1. He leido la ayuda, he preguntado por ahí y no soy capaz de abrir el archivo, siempre me dá una ventana en blanco. Seguro que es muy sencillo, pero ¿alguien me podria echar una mano?
    Gracias y un saludo a todos

    Hola a todos ... No tengo ni idea de porqué pero ya funciona. Os cuento lo que he hecho :
    1.- Me fuí a Bridge y purgué la cache, tanto la de la carpeta como la central. (Gracias Ramón). Volví a intentar abrir y no funcionó.
    2.- Desinstalé todo lo que "olía" a photoshop en la maquina. La dejé limpia de cualquier rastro, incluido el registro (restauré a una posición anterior a la ultima instalación).
    3.- Apagué y volví a encender.
    4.- Instalé de nuevo el paquete photoshop CS2.
    5.- Instalé de nuevo la version 3.1 de Camera Raw y del DNG y ...
    Funcionando todo como una seda. Abro los archivos grabados directamente desde la camara (.RAF) en photoshop sin problemas, me abre el camera raw y ya puedo ajustar el balance de blancos, la temperatura, el contraste, en fin todo lo que permite camera raw. También lo abre y convierte sin ningún problema el DNG converter.
    Conclusión : algo (no sé el qué) de lo que he hecho ha servido para que esto funcione como debería haberlo hecho desde el principio.
    Diego, no te he mandado el archivo ya que se ha solucionado.
    Muchisimas gracias a todos y ya sabeis, si necesitais algo en lo que yo pueda, aquí estoy. Como veo poco (por el trabajo) el foro, os dejo mi correo por si me necesitais ... [email protected]
    Un saludo

Maybe you are looking for