Fuji X10 raw image distorted

Adobe raw for the fuji X10 outputs a distorted image, the image is also cropped horizontally.
When opening a X10 raw file (.RAF) in adobe raw, the following unexpected results:
about 3% is cropped from horizontal field of view (symmetrical, both sides)
the image is then "stretched" to fit the horizontal resolution
the status indicates a dimension of 6144 x 4608 pixels (the open dialog showed 4000 x 3000)
the image is stored as 6144 x 4608 pixels
Attached are 2 images, 1 converted by the camera, the other by adobe raw.
Converted by camera:
Converted by adobe raw (version 6.6.0.261):
I find this quite annoying. Does anyone know how to fix this?
Thanks.

You are right!
Somewhere in the raw process with both silky and ACR converters pixels at each side are discarded. The pixels of about 1 cm of the yardstick (see picture) are not used. The camera's converter does utilise these pixels, BUT squeezes the image to a 0.96 : 1 ratio. This ratio is 1:1 longer focal lengths, the "pixel loss" is then nearly 0.
The pixels might not be output to the raw file or are discarded by the convertors. Perhaps this is done because of quality degradation of corner pixels / coverage at short focal lengths. I'll test to see if it is also related to aperture. NOT an adobe raw issue I should say.
Lower half of image: more pixels at the sides with jpg from camera
Image is squeezed when processed by camera
Original image, 28mm, F2.0

Similar Messages

Fuji X10 RAW

Why supports iphoto on the new iPad the Fuji X10 RAW and a professional software like Aperture not?

I don't think iPhoto on iPad "supports" the Fuji X10. I think it's just displaying the embedded JPEG preview and not the actual RAW data.

Fuji X10 Raw Files

Is it posible to find out if Apple intend issuing an update to Aperture 3 to process Raw files from a Fuji X10 camera.

Yes, you will lose a lot of resolution by using Adobe DNG or any other third party Raw Converter.
For best results, use the in-camera Raw Converter.
I suggest that you read and digest the following:
The dpreview Fuji X10 Review
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x10/
Extract;
We appreciate in-camera Raw conversion in any camera, but with the X10, this control is absolutely crucial. Why? Because third party support for the X10's raw files is far from universal among the more popular raw converters on the market. And even worse, among the raw converters that do support the EXR sensor, the results are disappointing.
The inevitable downside to a non-standard sensor design is that it requires a different set of demosaicing algorithms for optimum results. In the raw converters we've used - including the SilkyPix version that ships with the camera - image resolution and fine detail are significantly worse than the X10's in-camera JPEGs. The converted Raw files appear very soft and are clearly not displaying the best image quality the sensor can produce. You can see this for yourself on both the Raw mode and studio comparison pages of this review. As it stands, you get significantly better image quality in terms of sharpness and resolution from processing Raw files in-camera than you do with external software.
Try using the X10 settings recommended in this article:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/9060476058/fuji-x10-exr-camera-suggestions-for- optimum-performance.
Regards,
iPentax

Fuji X10 RAW demosaic / sharpening quality

The Fuji X10 still has in Lightroom 4 this original poor sharpening with lots of reticulation.
We have been promised that this poor aspects which may result from an incomplete
demosaicing, would be scrutinized a little more carefully in upcoming releases.
It seems like this has not happened yet in LR 4.1 RC2 and knowing that the development team
has other priorities in complex demosaicing (Fuji X-Pro1), it may be good that the team also have a look
at this with Fuji to get this fixed.
Can someone in the development team can provide us some info/status on that?

The 4.1 update did not resolve the issue.
The DPReview in depth review has been published and, for the first time ever, I read that the camera generated JPG outperforms the developed Raw file by a large margin, mostly due the radically different non-Bayer sensor design.
I'm going on vacation in less than a week. I'll be shooting Raw+JPG knowing that, for the most of the shoots, I'll be going for the JPG version.
This is a serious issue for general workflow, where JPG version is meant to be treated as ready made preview while waiting for the Raw file to be demosaicized. Now the Raw and the JPG shouldnt be treated as a whole, because of the difference in size and quality. They become effectively two different shots. I can't rely on proper camera calibration for the Raw alone, so the look&feel of the photos I'll take with th X10 won't be as homogeneous as expected.
To tell the truth the X10 is just a walk around camera I bought for casual occasions and for my best half. My D300 will do the heavy lifting. I naively thought that I could have treated my X10 Raw files as any other NEF. Just normalize and add a bit of spice. I was wrong.
Let me state that I admire so much the work of Eric and his collegues. Lightroom is a piece of art. X10 support, however, is mediocre at best.

Fuji X10 RAW support on the way?

Are there any information regarding the support of the new Fujifilm X10 RAW files?
Unfortunately the RAF files are not the same like the X100.
There are already some rumors out there, that Apple is not going to support the X10...

I must admit - I am getting more and more tired of being an apple slave.
They published the latest camera update for aperture:
Canon PowerShot S100
Nikon 1 J1
Nikon 1 V1
Nikon COOLPIX P7100
Olympus PEN E-PL1s
Olympus PEN E-PL3
Olympus PEN E-PM1
Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FZ150
Sony Alpha NEX-5N
Sony Alpha SLT-A65
Sony Alpha SLT-A77
Still no RAW support for Fuji X10 - well done Apple!

Fuji S5 Raw Images and Processing

Hi
I am thinking of upgrading my Nikon d40x to a Fuji S5 and wanted to make sure this was 100% compatible with Aperture (which I use a lot). I have downloaded a RAW image and found that it works apart from the recovery and black point, is the file only then compatible with Aperture 1.0 and 1.5?
Any help welcome

Have you tested it yet?
Send me a file if you want and I will try it?
Sid
The LightroomExtra home page is right here.

Fuji x10 RAW support form july 2013 ?

Hello, I just find out that the raw file form my fuji x10 was not supported any more. But they was after raw update 4.05. Strange no ? Stranger the raw file disapear from iPhoto.

The list of supported cameras is here:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5371
fuji x10 has never been officially supported; the raw update 4.05 http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1629
added
          Fujifilm X20
          Fujifilm X100S
          Fujifilm X-E1
          Fujifilm X-Pro1
It was an accident, that it also worked for fuji X10. Have you send feedback, that you want that "feature" back?

PSE8 CR6.2 SLT-A33 Raw Images Distorted on Load

We're using PSE8 with Camera Raw 6.2 to edit Sony SLT-A33 raw files. We have taken some photos that have the sun in them. When we view the raw files in Camera Raw 6.2, the sun is a bright artificial red ball. And if there are any people in the forground of the picture, they are a bright artificial blue color. If we view the files in Photo Elements 8 Organizer or any other photo viewer that can view raw files, the picture looks normal.
Obviously, this has something to do with Camera Raw 6.2. Is anyone else experiencing anything similar, or have any idea what may be causing this? At this point, we're afraid to try to edit any raw photos in Camera Raw 6.2.

The reds and blues you are seeing are likely due to the clipping indicators being turned on. Red indicates highlight clipping (one or more of the RGB channels is completely maxed out) and blue indicates shadow clipping (one or more of the RGB channels is zeros).
You can enable and disable the highlight clipping indicators by clicking on the triangles at either end of the histogram. A thin white frame around the indicator means the warning will be persistent and you can turn it off by clicking on it. When the indicator is not persistent you can get a temporary indication of clipping by hovering over one of the triangles.

Raw update breaks camera support for Fuji X10 raw file.

Just a headsup, do not update!

Only Apple can asnwer the "Why?" questions, I'm afriad.
Aperture menu -> Provide Aperture Feedback and let them know you want it.

Any news on Fuji x10 support?

Any news or workarounds for Fuji x10 RAW images?
Thanks!
Steve

Interesting. He evidently has access to beta versions that the rest of us don't.
http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2011/11/lightroom-3-6-and-camera-raw-6-6-available -on-adobe-labsoe.html
If Sean Reid is telling the truth, then the odds of x10 support being in the final 3.6 version just went up a bit.
Hal

Fuji x10 with EXR sensor - Is there RAW support in Lightroom 5

Hello,
I am about to purchase the Fuji x10 because now you can get them at a very reasonable price. I prefer shooting in RAW and I found out that there is a problem with the new Fuji EXR sensor. When I do an online research about this fine camera I read a lot about problems that RAW converters have with this special Fuji EXR sensor and the poor results you get when developing the Fuji RAW files. I can read in the Adobe list that Lightroom supports the Fuji x10 but does this mean that Adobe solved the problems with the EXR sensor in Lightroom 5?
Is there anybody who developes Fuji x10 RAW files with the latest Lightroom 5 version and can tell me what results she or he gets?
Shooting JPGs only wouldn't be a solution for me, so I really hope Adobe found a way to deal with this EXR sensor.
Thanks for every help and good advice.
Conroy

Those are new profiles created by Adobe to emulate the conversion that is done by the Fujifilm Camera firmware that processes the raw data in the camera. They are profiles for processing the RAW data. Adobe also provides a standard Profile specific to the x10 for the processing of the raw data, it is labeled "Adobe Standard".
The only way you will be know if you will be happy with the processing of Fujifilm RAW files by Lightroom is by doing what ssprengel advises, get some raw files from the x10 and test for yourself.
Looking at the camera "Review" of the x10 done in 2012 almost 2 years ago by DPReview I would say the ACR/LR processing or raw files from the x10 got a sub-standard review. Since that time ACR/LR have created new profiles and the only way to satisfy your self is to do some testing. The profile referred to above have been produced after the 2012 review so should provide improved results.
If you need some more info from Fujifilm users you can think about posting in the forum for Fujifilm Camera in the DPReview forum see the link below.
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/1020?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=mainmenu&utm_med ium=text&ref=mainmenu

Why is no support for raw file of fuji x10 from Apple ?

I have waiting for sometime for the update to support fuji x10 raw file from Apple. Please make it happen .

We can't. This is a user to user forum. You can sign up for a free online developer account on http://developer.apple.com/ and submit a bug report on http://bugreporter.apple.com/
You can request Fuji to do the same.
You can check the complete listing of RAW updates on:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4757
If you look there the x100 is supported, but no x10 for Lion. So the chances of x10 on Snow Leopard support is that much more remote, since Apple typically builds on their support with each new operating system.

Fuji X10 & Camera Raw

I know every time a new camera comes out someone asks the same question but anyway:
When will Camera Raw support the newly released Fuji X10?
As we really need saving from having to use Silkypix

<My Opinion>
I feel photography is more akin to art than science, or at least has a foot firmly planted on both sides of that fence.
Since displays and prints can hardly be imagined to emulate the light and color dynamics of true reality, I feel the use of the word "accurate" as describes color is often misleading. I might be willing to support "consistent", but my experience says that accurate color is in practice a red herring, and even consistent color is elusive.
In short, those who try for accurate color often achieve lousy looking color instead. Kind of an "operation was a success but the patient died" kind of thing. It may make them feel good somehow inside to think the RGB numbers are right, but the reality is that the image actually suffers. Then, as Vit points out, sometimes we even find out those golden numbers weren't actually "right" (by today's definition) either. To me it just seems silly.
I'll go so far as to say it seems to me it's virtually a necessity to develop a non-Adobe profile with an artistic eye to get good color and even consistent color. It has been that way for me, in my experience with Camera Raw and the equipment I've used.
In that vein, if a DNG can contain data provided by a camera maker that produces color that's consistent with the color they produce in the camera or in their own converter software (which is what sold us on that particular brand/model), then it would likely be a Good Thing not to have an Adobe-developed profile involved. Perhaps this is the missing link I've been needing. If that's the case, more power to Adobe's efforts to get manufacturers to use DNG!
I really don't wish to step on the toes of folks who feel Adobe's profiles are good. More power to you if you do! I just haven't found much joy in them myself.
</My Opinion>
-Noel

Why no RAW support for Fuji X10?

The Fuji X10 has been on the market for almost a year now and there still is no RAW support for it in Aperture. Why?

Only Apple can asnwer the "Why?" questions, I'm afriad.
Aperture menu -> Provide Aperture Feedback and let them know you want it.

How to correct distorted raw image?

The image i took was one of my desktop accessories from about one ft. away and at 24mm wide angle. in the image"s four corners is the black edges of the lens.(raw one) Also the front edge of the desk is curved inwards and i have some bowing of the desktop accessories. how can this be corrected? I am sending two images one jpeg and the other the raw image.The second one is the RAW one.thanks!! what else can be corrected in the raw image.

thank you. I used this filter ie the distortion slider and then the edge slider and this straighted out the image and the black vignetting of the lens on all 4 corners of raw image. Have a good day!!
Irwin Lakin
[Admin - Please do not post email or phone number]
Message was edited by: Brett N

Fuji X10 raw image distorted

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for