Fuji X10 RAW support on the way?

Are there any information regarding the support of the new Fujifilm X10 RAW files?
Unfortunately the RAF files are not the same like the X100.
There are already some rumors out there, that Apple is not going to support the X10...

I must admit - I am getting more and more tired of being an apple slave.
They published the latest camera update for aperture:
Canon PowerShot S100
Nikon 1 J1
Nikon 1 V1
Nikon COOLPIX P7100
Olympus PEN E-PL1s
Olympus PEN E-PL3
Olympus PEN E-PM1
Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FZ150
Sony Alpha NEX-5N
Sony Alpha SLT-A65
Sony Alpha SLT-A77
Still no RAW support for Fuji X10 - well done Apple!

Similar Messages

  • Fuji x10 RAW support form july 2013 ?

    Hello, I just find out that the raw file form my fuji x10 was not supported any more. But they was after raw update 4.05. Strange no ? Stranger the raw file disapear from iPhoto.

    The list of supported cameras is here:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5371
    fuji x10 has never been officially supported; the raw update 4.05 http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1629
    added
              Fujifilm X20
              Fujifilm X100S
              Fujifilm X-E1
              Fujifilm X-Pro1
    It was an accident, that it also worked for fuji X10.  Have you send feedback, that you want that "feature" back?

  • Fuji X10 RAW

    Why supports iphoto on the new iPad the Fuji X10 RAW and a professional software like Aperture not?

    I don't think iPhoto on iPad "supports" the Fuji X10.  I think it's just displaying the embedded JPEG preview and not the actual RAW data.

  • [Consolidation-Locked] Please add RAW support for the Nikon D600 to Lightroom as soon as possible!

    My Fair Adobe,
    Please add RAW support for the Nikon D600 to Lightroom as soon as possible!
    ViewNX lets me get to the images, but come on!!! I know Lightroom, and you, ViewNX, are no Lightroom.
    Yes, I see everyone else ASKING for D600 support. I'm here to beg for it! Don't make me wait much longer!
    Message title was edited by: Brett N
    Message title was edited by: Brett N

    Rob, my reading of your site is that this plug-in copies settings from raw to jpeg, does it work the other way around as well?
    Rob Cole wrote:
    One of the great things about the new 0-based defaults and linear tone curve is:
    You can develop the jpegs now, in Lightroom, and then sync the settings to the raws later (e.g. using RawPlusJpeg), and provided you select a matching camera profile, they will look almost the same (white balance won't translate over, but everything else will, more or less). Beware lens corrections applied to the raws might alter the registration of precision local adjustments.
    Note: I recommend shooting with ADL off in order for this to work better, and consider turning sharpening off in camera as well, and noise reduction and everything else to whatever extent is possible.
    Rob

  • [Consolidation-Locked] RAW support for the Nikon D600?

    When will Adobe update RAW support for the Nikon D600?
    Message title was edited by: Brett N

    Lightroom 4.2 and Camera Raw 7.2 (Elements 11) are currently available and provide support for the Nikon D600.
    Go to Help > (Check for) Updates to install.
    Please see: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4785056

  • HT4757 RAW support for the SONY RX100?

    Anyone know when will Apple be adding RAW support for the SONY RX100?

    Unfortunately this is a user forum, so no-one can answer that one for you.  You can use the feedback option in aperture to request it though.  More than likely it wont come until Canon or Nikon release some more DSLRs, which is usually what prompts an update.  For what it's worth you can use the Adobe DNG converter which will convert the sony .arw file into a .dng file that Aperture can read.  It is another step to your workflow but you can do it.

  • Raw Support for the X Pro 1 from Fuji

    Does anybody has an idea how to integrate Raw Files from the XPRO1 from Fuji?
    I use MBP with 10.8.5 and keep Aperture 3.4.5 until I am sure all issues that appeared once are fixed or Aperture 4 will be available.
    So the question further would be if 3.5 supports the XPRO1?
    Thanks in advance

    "Too many issues were written?"
    Ummm... Anything specific? I've seen no issues on Mavericks that are worse in any way than on Mountain Lion. If you're reading on the Internet, note that nobody ever writes in just to say "works great!"
    FWIW most reviews I've seen point that the OS X raw converter does a better job with Fuji RAW files than does Lightroom.

  • Why no RAW support for the Fuji FinePix HS10?

    This camera is well over a year old.  Why is there no support for the RAW file?

    It is definitely not only Fuji. I used a Panasonic Lumix FX-150 before that has been supported by Adobe Camera Raw for quite some time now. I replaced that camera by a Lumix LX5, but I see that the FX-150 is still not supported by Apple Camera Raw and probably never will.
    If you want wide range RAW support, use Lightroom. (Not to say that Aperture doesn't have its strengths, e.g. support for geocoding.)

  • Fuji (X10) EXR support bugged

    Lightroom supports Fuji X10 EXR RAF files since version 4 Beta (and v3.6), but unfortunately it is not working properly. There are two different EXR modes and Lightroom seems to support both, but the outcome is not right.
    1) Loading 6 MP EXR DR (200/400) mode where images of the two sensor halves are saved in the RAF file leads to wrong colors. Specifically the attenuated highlights of the longer exposed half are turned to purple while they should at least be neutral grey (attenuated clipped white). There also are color artifacts on the edges between the two blended halves when clipped highlights are present.
    Generally I would like to be able to have more control over the whole blending process and especially be able to get more information out of clipped highlights. Both Lightroom and the in-camera JPGs just ungracefully attenuate clipped whites from the longer exposed half to gray, but do *not* use the unclipped information of the shorter exposed half to get more information out of them.
    Even though Capture One also doesn't give any control over the blending process I was able to pull out detail/information from those highlights while in Lightroom I can only turn bright purple into dark purple regardless of whatever exposure relevant slider I use.
    2) Loading 12 MP full resolution RAF files generally works, but there is _less_ detail in them than in out-of-camera JPG, regardless of what filter/sharpness settings I tried. Lightrooms lens correction for the X10 works better than the in-camera one in that it does not compress the middle of the image (by cutting more off the sides), so in the middle there might be slightly mode detail out of Lightroom. But the rest of the image only gets detail on a level somewhere in between 6 MP ooc JPG and MP ooc JPG (meaning more detail than 6 MP, but less than 12 MP).
    I can imagine that the demosaicing process could be optimized, but another culprit might be Lightroom's sharpening method, especially where the "Detail" slider is concerned. The Detail slider seems to have a hard time with EXR pattern in general and especially EXR noise pattern. Increasing Detail on Lightroom's Sharpening filter mostly increases noise and quite considerably so. Especially on 12 MP full resolution files the labyrinth like noise pattern of the EXR images gets sharpened a lot by the Detail slider.
    LR's luminance filter seems to suffer from EXR specific noise patterns, too. Again it has a hard time finding the right balance of eliminating noise while keeping detail, at least compared to the in-camera noise filter (and some other RAW software I tried).
    One more thing that I am not sure about whether it is a problem of RAW software (aka LR) or the camera: While reds in JPG may either be somewhat oversaturated while at other times clip the red channel into turning reds to pink I noticed that in LR they may appear more orange. Pushing orange towards red via sliders helps with that, but I wonder if this is a form of misinterpretation by Lightroom or if the raw file really contains more orange than red information?
    Thanks for any answers in advance!

    "High Resolution" DR (ISO equal or higher than DR) in M size should be usable. L size is usable, too, but the detail is lacking (more than 6 mp, but less than 12 mp ooc JPGs). EXR DR RAW files are a special case. It's not easy to even create them with the camera, because you have to use RAW + JPG and ISO below DR and then shoot a situation where ISO below 400 is enough (broad daylight).
    And these files are usable, but colors are somewhat off in LR, which can at least partly be managed via HSL. It's not perfect, because highlights of the longer exposed sensor half are handled wrong (from my point of view), but I send some example images now. We need to give Chan some time, because I only sent the files a few days ago.
    One thing that doesn't work well between LR is EXR kind of noise and LR's sharpening. Some people called that "reticulation pattern" on the DPreview forum. What happens is that LR's sharpening tends to sharpen noise more distinct than anything else, so you need to keep that "Detail" slider down and overally watch sharpening. Also LR's luminance noise-reduction tends to remove more detail than the in-camera one and the color noise slider has to be used with caution in order to keep saturation (default value is too high).
    It's all workable, but not exactly in love with each other.

  • Fuji X10 RAW demosaic / sharpening quality

    The Fuji X10 still has in Lightroom 4 this original poor sharpening with lots of reticulation.
    We have been promised that this poor aspects which may result from an incomplete
    demosaicing, would be scrutinized a little more carefully in upcoming releases.
    It seems like this has not happened yet in LR 4.1 RC2 and knowing that the development team
    has other priorities in complex demosaicing (Fuji X-Pro1), it may be good that the team also have a look
    at this with Fuji to get this fixed.
    Can someone in the development team can provide us some info/status on that?

    The 4.1 update did not resolve the issue.
    The DPReview in depth review has been published and, for the first time ever, I read that the camera generated JPG outperforms the developed Raw file by a large margin, mostly due the radically different non-Bayer sensor design.
    I'm going on vacation in less than a week. I'll be shooting Raw+JPG knowing that, for the most of the shoots, I'll be going for the JPG version.
    This is a serious issue for general workflow, where JPG version is meant to be treated as ready made preview while waiting for the Raw file to be demosaicized. Now the Raw and the JPG shouldnt be treated as a whole, because of the difference in size and quality. They become effectively two different shots. I can't rely on proper camera calibration for the Raw alone, so the look&feel of the photos I'll take with th X10 won't be as homogeneous as expected.
    To tell the truth the X10 is just a walk around camera I bought for casual occasions and for my best half. My D300 will do the heavy lifting. I naively thought that I could have treated my X10 Raw files as any other NEF. Just normalize and add a bit of spice. I was wrong.
    Let me state that I admire so much the work of Eric and his collegues. Lightroom is a piece of art. X10 support, however, is mediocre at best.

  • Fuji X100 raw support ?

    Fujiguys on twitter indicate that there is no plan to bring X100 (.raf) raw support in Aperture, but only to 3rd party Mac software. Why that ? Does Apple has plans to bring this support to Aperture users ?

    I hope Apple and the other lot get their act together soon.
    I believe Fuji has to make the specs available first in order for others to support the format. And although it was announced back in September, those specs weren't final until the first production units started shipping - this month. From what I've seen and read the Silkypix based software that comes bundled with the camera is far from perfect - I've seen serious problems with highlights on one example. So for me it's a question of getting it right and not simply getting it out the door.
    I agree the jpg's from it are impressive, but they don't give you the raw file.
    Totally agree with you. To me, shooting JPEG only is like throwing away negatives. But it's nice to know they've done such a good job internally. It makes the camera that much more interesting and the wait a little more bearable. RAW+JPEG a must though.
    This camera is a game changer in the bigger scheme of things, and will be used by a lot of influential photographers.
    Looks that way but time will tell. I for one am totally sold and can't wait to pick up my pre-order. I haven't been this excited about a camera in a long time.

  • Fuji X10 Raw Files

    Is it posible to find out if Apple intend issuing an update to Aperture 3 to process Raw files from a Fuji X10 camera.

    Yes, you will lose a lot of resolution by using Adobe DNG or any other third party Raw Converter.
    For best results, use the in-camera Raw Converter.
    I suggest that you read and digest the following:
    The dpreview Fuji X10 Review
    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x10/
    Extract;
    We appreciate in-camera Raw conversion in any camera, but with the X10, this control is absolutely crucial. Why? Because third party support for the X10's raw files is far from universal among the more popular raw converters on the market. And even worse, among the raw converters that do support the EXR sensor, the results are disappointing.
    The inevitable downside to a non-standard sensor design is that it requires a different set of demosaicing algorithms for optimum results. In the raw converters we've used - including the SilkyPix version that ships with the camera - image resolution and fine detail are significantly worse than the X10's in-camera JPEGs. The converted Raw files appear very soft and are clearly not displaying the best image quality the sensor can produce. You can see this for yourself on both the Raw mode and studio comparison pages of this review. As it stands, you get significantly better image quality in terms of sharpness and resolution from processing Raw files in-camera than you do with external software.
    Try using the X10 settings recommended in this article:
    http://www.dpreview.com/articles/9060476058/fuji-x10-exr-camera-suggestions-for- optimum-performance.
    Regards,
    iPentax

  • Fuji X10 raw image distorted

    Adobe raw for the fuji X10 outputs a distorted image, the image is also cropped horizontally.
    When opening a X10 raw file (.RAF) in adobe raw, the following unexpected results:
    about 3% is cropped from horizontal field of view (symmetrical, both sides)
    the image is then "stretched" to fit the horizontal resolution
    the status indicates a dimension of 6144 x 4608 pixels (the open dialog showed 4000 x 3000)
    the image is stored as 6144 x 4608 pixels
    Attached are 2 images, 1 converted by the camera, the other by adobe raw.
    Converted by camera:
    Converted by adobe raw (version 6.6.0.261):
    I find this quite annoying. Does anyone know how to fix this?
    Thanks.

    You are right!
    Somewhere in the raw process with both silky and ACR converters pixels at each side are discarded. The pixels of about 1 cm of the yardstick (see picture) are not used. The camera's converter does utilise these pixels, BUT squeezes the image to a 0.96 : 1 ratio. This ratio is 1:1 longer focal lengths, the "pixel loss" is then nearly 0.
    The pixels might not be output to the raw file or are discarded by the convertors. Perhaps this is done because of quality degradation of corner pixels / coverage at short focal lengths. I'll test to see if it is also related to aperture. NOT an adobe raw issue I should say.
    Lower half of image: more pixels at the sides with jpg from camera
    Image is squeezed when processed by camera
    Original image, 28mm, F2.0

  • RAW support for the Olympus PEN E-PL7

    Hi,
    recently bought the E-PL7 (backup for the E-M1) and was very disappointed to realize that iPhoto does not support the RAW(ORF)-files the camera generates.
    The camera is on the market since three months and there seems to be no update....
    Is there any way to trigger the folks at Apple to give it a go ?
    Michael

    Thanks !
    I've already filed a request for an update
    Michael

  • Raw Support for the just Announced EXR Cams+S200EXR

    I know this had been brought up before, but please support the raw format for the Fuji EXR cams! We will have 4 EXR raw capable camera soon(S200EXR,HS20, F500, and F550)!!

    The Stylus 1 has been supported since ACR 8.3 according to Adobe’s supported cameras list:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html

Maybe you are looking for