Fuji X100 raw support ?

Fujiguys on twitter indicate that there is no plan to bring X100 (.raf) raw support in Aperture, but only to 3rd party Mac software. Why that ? Does Apple has plans to bring this support to Aperture users ?

I hope Apple and the other lot get their act together soon.
I believe Fuji has to make the specs available first in order for others to support the format. And although it was announced back in September, those specs weren't final until the first production units started shipping - this month. From what I've seen and read the Silkypix based software that comes bundled with the camera is far from perfect - I've seen serious problems with highlights on one example. So for me it's a question of getting it right and not simply getting it out the door.
I agree the jpg's from it are impressive, but they don't give you the raw file.
Totally agree with you. To me, shooting JPEG only is like throwing away negatives. But it's nice to know they've done such a good job internally. It makes the camera that much more interesting and the wait a little more bearable. RAW+JPEG a must though.
This camera is a game changer in the bigger scheme of things, and will be used by a lot of influential photographers.
Looks that way but time will tell. I for one am totally sold and can't wait to pick up my pre-order. I haven't been this excited about a camera in a long time.

Similar Messages

  • Fuji x100 RAW compatibility?

    I read on the Aperture 3 support page that it supports Fuji x100 RAW photos.  But when I just imported some, while it showed thumbnails during the import process, when the images themselves were imported, each and every one showed as a black box saying "unsupported format."
    Any advice?
    Thanks
    jhbeckman

    What version of Aperture and what version of the OS?
    The Fujifilm FinePix X100 ws included in Digital Camera Raw update 3.7

  • Fuji X10 RAW support on the way?

    Are there any information regarding the support of the new Fujifilm X10 RAW files?
    Unfortunately the RAF files are not the same like the X100.
    There are already some rumors out there, that Apple is not going to support the X10...

    I must admit - I am getting more and more tired of being an apple slave.
    They published the latest camera update for aperture:
    Canon PowerShot S100
    Nikon 1 J1
    Nikon 1 V1
    Nikon COOLPIX P7100
    Olympus PEN E-PL1s
    Olympus PEN E-PL3
    Olympus PEN E-PM1
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FZ150
    Sony Alpha NEX-5N
    Sony Alpha SLT-A65
    Sony Alpha SLT-A77
    Still no RAW support for Fuji X10 - well done Apple!

  • Fuji X100 RAW conversion

    Hello all,
    I have noticed that the RAW files from the Fuji X100 when opened in Aperture (v. 3.5), compared to the in-camera processed JPEGS:
    1) are significantly more saturated, especially in the BLUE channel (but also in the red one)
    2) show a noticeable vignetting
    3) show chromatic aberration (while the in-camera JPEG don't)
    Did anybody else notice that?  It seems clear that Aperture does not correct for vignetting and chromatic aberration (which is NOT good), but also tends to blow out the saturation for the blue....
    thanks for any comment
    giuseppe

    What should be have been changed, Leonie?
    The over saturated colors. I did not expect lens correction to be added by a simple raw compatibity update, but we have seen problems with oversaturated colors been caused by faulty raw updates, for example  Camera Raw update (4.08) : 
    See My 2012 iMac is on acid NEF files stopped being displayed on iPhoto and Preview, and all pictures are turning red in my library for examples.
    This problem was fixed with Camera Raw update (4.09), but it may have introduced a problem with oversaturated colors, as seen in the examples above, that is why I have been asking -hoping that a new raw compatibility update might solve any such problems.

  • Major BUG in DNG conversion of Fuji x100s raw files.

    I use an imac with latest os10.8.4 and I converted RAF =raw files from fuji x100s to dng format with DNG Converter 8.1.0.43.
    I have never seen such a horrifically bad problem in 15+ years. PS user of very long time.
    I attached 2 image files to the problem given by another member who was trying to use xrite.
    I am posting here as it is a problem of interest to anyone who is using the x100s or considering it.
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/5634178#5634178

    The compatibility options are really to indicate which version of ACR you intend to use to read the raw file.  Then the DNG Converter can decide whether it needs to do any additional processing to the file so that the (older) version of ACR can read it properly. 
    In the case of the Fuji X-Trans sensor with its 6x6 mosaic pattern (which requires a specialized interpolation routine for high quality results), the key distinction is whether DNG Converter performs the interpolation routine, or the older version of ACR performs the interpolation routine.  If you choose "Camera Raw 7.1 and later" compatibility, then you're indicating that you plan to process the image using Camera Raw version 7.1 or later (e.g., ACR 7.4, ACR 8.1, etc.).  These newer versions of ACR contain specialized interpolation routines for the X-Trans sensor, so the DNG file that is produced with "Camera Raw 7.1 and later" compatibility will be stored in the original mosaic form.  When you read these files in ACR 7.1 and later, the specialized X-Trans interpolation routines will be used to process the files.
    If you choose "Camera Raw 6.6 and later" compatibility, then you're indicating that you plan to process the image using CR 6.6 and later (e.g., ACR 6.7, ACR 7.0, ACR 7.1, etc.).  Some of these older versions of ACR (such as ACR 6.7) do not have specialized interpolation routines for the X-Trans sensor.  The DNG Converter understands this, and therefore performs the X-trans specific interpolation itself to produce linear RGB data, which is then stored into the DNG.  So, the DNG file produced in this case does not contain the original mosaic data, but instead contains interpolated linear RGB data.  The older ACR versions (like 6.7) can open this linear RGB data in the DNG directly, without having to perform any specialized X-Trans demosaicing (remember, this is important, because ACR 6.7 doesn't contain that specialized logic).  This is also why the DNG files in this case are significantly larger in size compared to the images in the first case: they contain linear RGB data (3 color channels) instead of mosaic data (1 channel).

  • DNG profile with Fuji X100s raw files...

    Hi,
    I'm trying to make a dng profile for my Fuji X100s (I did the same recently for my Canon 5dII).
    Because I shoot architecture and interiors, I profiled for daylight, tungsten, and flourescent light (I also did this for the Canon with success, much improved color, sepecially in fllourescent light).
    With the Fuji x100s, the daylight profile was good, the tungsten seemed very desaturated, and the profiler kept giving me an error message for the flourescent light saying there was an extreme color cast on the grey patch and it couldn't create a profile (I tried 2850, 6500, and "both tables"). The grey patch on the flourescent card was reading (aprox) 3200K and +50 Magenta, so not off the charts, so to speak....
    Why is this? Is it to do with the type of sensor in the camera (Xtrans CMOS)?
    Thanks,
    Alan.

    JPGs are relatively small, and raw files relatively big, so if there is an issue writing data to the card where it corrupts after a certain amount is written, then the raw file could be the only file with enough data written to it thing that is corrupt.  If every single raw file is corrupted the same way and none of the JPGs seem to be then it may be something else related to raw files on the computer, like the computer memory, or the drive that the camera-raw cache is on, or even a virus-scanner locking a file at the wrong time when it is written or read.  The other thing to watch is that the raw files have an embedded JPG preview in them that may be ok, as well, and only when LR interprets the raw data will the corruption be visible.  The embedded JPG preview is what you see in the Import panel grid and is also what you see momentarily just after you’ve imported, before LR has a chance to recompute a preview from the raw data.
    To see both raw and jpgs in LR then you need enable the LR preference to treat raw and jpg files separately, for future imports so what you’ve already imported will stay the same, until you do a Synchronize on the folder Once you enable that preference then you can synchronize the folder to have LR reimport just the new (newly visible) JPGs. 
    The most important initial test to do is transfer the same set of files from the card to the computer more than once—you’ll have to disable the duplicate checking temporarily—and check if they have precisely the same corruption in each copy of the image or if it looks different.  If it is the same then the data is likely bad on the card.  If it is different, then the photos may be ok on the card and something in the transfer process or the computer, itself, may be bad, and there is hope you can mitigate the problem and get the uncorrupted raw data, somehow.

  • Fuji x100s RAW photos

    Please could someone tell me how to get Elements 11 to accept RAW photos from my Fuji x100s? KentishRob

    Hi,
    Have you updated your Camera Raw plug-in?
    In the editor, go to Help -> About Plug-in -> Camera RAW
    You need version 7.4
    To update, got to Help -> Updates and that should download and install the updates.
    If is still doesn't work, please tell us which operating system you are using.
    Brian

  • Fuji x10 RAW support form july 2013 ?

    Hello, I just find out that the raw file form my fuji x10 was not supported any more. But they was after raw update 4.05. Strange no ? Stranger the raw file disapear from iPhoto.

    The list of supported cameras is here:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5371
    fuji x10 has never been officially supported; the raw update 4.05 http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1629
    added
              Fujifilm X20
              Fujifilm X100S
              Fujifilm X-E1
              Fujifilm X-Pro1
    It was an accident, that it also worked for fuji X10.  Have you send feedback, that you want that "feature" back?

  • Proper support for Fuji EXR Raw Files

    There is still no proper support for Fuji  EXR Raw files.  On any Fuji X-series camera, the in-camera raw processing, including specifying options always outputs a far superior image that Adobe Camera Raw 6.  I've been using an X100 for some time now, and have really gathered some great images with it. But Adobe Camera Raw fails miserably to understand how to process these files.
    This is more of a complaint and feature request than a question, because I already know the answer. Adobe has not worked close enough, or at all, with Fuji to develop a Raw processor for the EXR pixel layout.
    The EXR pixel arrangement offers new possibilities, especially the ability to take an HDR image of a moving subject, and without a tripod. The elimination of the low-pass filter allows for more sharpness, and finally the noise pattern is much more "film-like".
    I've been using Adobe Photoshop for processing images for years, but have no compelling reason to upgrade without a proper conversion for Fuji RAW files.
    Adobe: Please work with Fuji to bring world-class support for EXR Raw images.
    Thank you,
    William

    Good day!
    Adobe has not worked close enough, or at all, with Fuji to develop a Raw processor for the EXR pixel layout.
    There seems to be a reason why Adobe has to reverse engineer RAW formats – the camera manufacturers don’t want their customers to use Adobe (and other) software to process their RAW files. (If their proprietary software gets better results then that’s understandable, but for how long are they going to support their own software?)
    Now maybe Fuji is more cooperative than others, but do you know that for certain?
    I've been using Adobe Photoshop for processing images for years, but have no compelling reason to upgrade without a proper conversion for Fuji RAW files.
    If the new/improved features of Photoshop CS6 have no significance for the way you process, manage, edit and touch-up photographs feel free to stick with whatever version of Photoshop you use currently, but be aware that hardware/OS changes on your side may some day make that version inoperable on your set-up.
    Also the upgrade path has been cut down to one version, if I understand correctly.
    Anyway, this is a beginners Forum, feature requests might be better posted over at
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family
    Regards,
    Pfaffenbichler

  • Fuji x100 will aperture support this camera ?

    Does anyone know if Aperture intends to support the new Fuji X 100, or if they don't what other tools are available to import the x100 raw files into Aperture ?

    There's no way to know unfortunately.
    what other tools are available to import the x100 raw files into Aperture ?
    the X100 RAW files need to be converted in either RAW File Converter EX (which is bundled with the camera) or the free RAW Photo Processor. Needless to say it's a very cumbersome and clumsy process. So much so that I've gone back to shooting JPEG with this camera for the time being, which takes some getting used to.
    I'll probably start shooting RAW+JPEG once I'm out of my testing phase in the hopes that Apple will eventually support it. I can't see myself integrating either of the apps I mentioned in my normal workflow, even if I'm not planning to use the X100 as a work camera.
    Fingers crossed for Aperture support.

  • Fuji X100 support?

    The latest upgrade of LR, 3.4.1 claims that it now supports the Fuji X100.
    Am I missing something?
    All my X100 RAW files continue to import 1-3 stops underexposed in LR. I do not see any improvement at all with this upgrade.
    Can someone at Adobe please help me understand why a properly exposed file from the X100 imports so underexposed in LR with 3.4.1 installed?
    I must be doing something wrong.
    Thank you.
    Dennis

    The DR suggestion is a good one. But it is one that never came up with the Fuji S5 files. Those files never processed great in LR but they were still a lot better than these.
    I'm looking at a typical daylight shot here, it's slightly backlit so I overexposed just a tad. 1/680 @ f10 @ 800 ISO (sorry for the weird numbers...). This should have been a near perfect exposure (for the shadows), even a little hot for the daylight spots. But in LR my exposure is +1.65 and Brightness is +61. That's like two stops for an image that should already be overexposed.
    Now, this is at 400% DR. ?  2 stops = 2 stops? could be.
    My concern is with increasing noise on these lightroom developing increases. But it does seem that it's not really affecting the files that way - as the last poster noted. Of course it's hard to tell.
    Checking another daylight exposure I see the same formula where 400% DR could be the reason for the two stop push in LR.
    This also makes sense because many of my low light shots (where DR does not kick in) seem to be fine exposure wise.
    I'll keep a closer eye on this.
    Can this issue be addressed in LR processing?
    Thanks,
    Dennis

  • HT1338 My fuji x100s has RAW file compatibility issue with OS 10.8.2

    My fuji x100s has RAW file compatibility issue with OS 10.8.2, my iphoto11 cannot recognise the file format.  Anyone know of this issue too? Appreciate if anyone can offer some helps.  Thanks

    Correct.  The Fuji X-100s is not currently supported by iPhoto or Aperture (or the RAW converter in OS X itself).  You can submit feedback via iPhoto and request this.

  • Why no RAW support for the Fuji FinePix HS10?

    This camera is well over a year old.  Why is there no support for the RAW file?

    It is definitely not only Fuji. I used a Panasonic Lumix FX-150 before that has been supported by Adobe Camera Raw for quite some time now. I replaced that camera by a Lumix LX5, but I see that the FX-150 is still not supported by Apple Camera Raw and probably never will.
    If you want wide range RAW support, use Lightroom. (Not to say that Aperture doesn't have its strengths, e.g. support for geocoding.)

  • Why no RAW support for Fuji X10?

    The Fuji X10 has been on the market for almost a year now and there still is no RAW support for it in Aperture. Why?

    Only Apple can asnwer the "Why?" questions, I'm afriad.
    Aperture menu -> Provide Aperture Feedback and let them know you want it.

  • Will Adobe Camera Raw 7.4 or 8.7.1 work with Adobe Photoshop CS 5 version 12.1 x64 bit on a Mac OSX version 10.7.5 Lion.I am having differculty opening Raw RAF files on Camera Fuji X100s.Many thanks for your help out there.

    WILL  Adobe Camera Raw 7.4 or Later version 8.7.1 work with Adobe Photoshop CS5.5 extended version 12.1 x 64 bit with a Mac OSX
    10.7.5 lion. I am having trouble opening RAF raw files on my newly acquired Fuji X100S camera.Many thanks

    With that version of Photoshop, the most recent version of Camera Raw you can use is 6.7. If updating your Photoshop or subscribing to the creative cloud is not an option then you could use the free DNG converter provided by Adobe. The latest version of the DNG converter is 8.7.1. I am not familiar with Mac operating systems, so I'm not certain if your OS is compatible with the latest version. You can download it and try.
    Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Macintosh : Adobe DNG Converter 8.7.1

Maybe you are looking for

  • While creating a new row in table,the total data present in table is coming

    Hi, From search page,i click add button,it goes to next transaction page.In transaction page i drag and drop one VO in table and in form also.But in that transaction page,The table is coming with data and a new row is also able to insert.But i don't

  • Which is faster - Member formula or Calculation scripts?

    Hi, I have a very basic question, though I am not sure if there is a definite right or wrong answer. To keep the calculation scripts to a minimum, I have put all the calculations in member formula. Which is faster - Member formula or calculation scri

  • Accidentally put documents in Applications folder, can't get them out

    In Finder I accidentally moved a folder with two Word documents from the Desktop to the Applications folder. I can't move them back out. When I try, I get pointers to the documents in the Applications folder. I can delete the folder, but then the doc

  • How to safely remove 32-bit Photoshop CS4 from Win7 64-bit?

    I have installed Master Collection CS4 on my ThinkPad running Win7 64-bit. The installer installed both the 32-bit and 64-bit Photoshop CS4 which is wasting the hard disk space. There seems to be no way to install only the 64-bit PS from the installe

  • Making request in CUP

    Hi ! We have our workflow currently designed  for Aproving Access, but when somebody create a request for New User I don`t want they have to choose any role but it`s seem to be mandatory if the request type is New_Account. ( I try to take off the act