Full browser support -.-;;;;;;

This has become a rather annoying problem, but first, let me start out with a little bit of fact.
1.NEARLY 3 YEARS HAS GONE BY SINCE 64 BIT VISTA HAS BEEN RELEASE TO THE PUBLIC.
2.A LARGE PERCENTAGE OF COMPUTERS BEING SOLD TO THE PUBLIC ARE 64 BIT MACHINES WITH VISTA PRE-INSTALLED
3.THERE IS STILL YET TO BE A FUNCTIONING INTEGRATED WEB BROWSER MEDIA PLAYER FOR ANY AND ALL WEB BROWSER APPLICATIONS FOR 64 BIT VISTA (Possibly Window 7 also).
The closest I have come to solving the issue of being able to open media files in the web browser is with Quicktime. I think it's rather archaic to download the file and open it manually, mostly because it's a feature that I am accustom to in some of my 32 bit machines. After all, these type of things aren't groundbreaking ideas at all; Plugins or media applications that function within the web browser. Instead what I get with my brand new very nice computer is a series of problems, each requiring their own little work around, and sometimes that do not have workarounds period. Allow me time to elaborate on one that Apple is causing me.
Please to explain why, when I open a media file link (mp3, mov, etc.), instead of a progress bar I get this:
http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/1516/capturetf.jpg
Black bars where the progress bar should be? Sure, I can control the file still, by clicking where I think or I remember the buttons are. But WHY, WHY has this not been addressed? I do not know much about programing, nor do I know much about how x64 differs from x86. However, what I do know is that Vista x64 has been out for quite some time now, far more than enough time to let things like this slide. I have read the forums about this topic, and moderators claim it is a known issue. So, again, please to explain why this has not been addressed. It cannot be that big of a problem for a company like Apple. I might expect something like this issue coming from a third party community media player like VLC media player, but from Apple's Quicktime?
Apple, you have COMPLETELY dropped the ball on this. I'm not asking for Quicktime to control my stove, nor am I asking it to shave my face in the morning. I want Quicktime to play media, as it is intended to do, with simple controls, like Volume, Play/Pause and a progress bar. This problem has gone on long enough, Apple. You released a x64 ITunes recently, and I downloaded it expecting this issue to be resolved. But the problem persists. Even today.
I expected that with patience I would get an answer, OR MAYBE EVEN A WORKAROUND. Don't give me a "It's a known issue" bull. I want a solution, and I want it soon.

I don't understand what you are getting at. If by direct link you mean the URL that connects me to the file, then it opens a list of options for me to choose from. I can save the file, open it in a new tab/window, and things of that nature. I have not read the help files, because I'm all but certain this issue will not be addressed there. I have spent hours looking through the forums attempting to find a solution for this problem, but there simply isn't one. Take a look at the picture posted above. The black bar is where my controls would be. Thats a problem, and it's a basic function. This isn't an advanced function, so it's upsetting that it does not work. I want control of my embedded media files.

Similar Messages

  • I upgraded to v16 and now when I go to Hotmail/Qutlook email appears in mobile mode. How do I get it to appear in full browser mode?

    How do I get it to appear in full browser mode?

    Clear the cache and the cookies from sites that cause problems.
    "Clear the Cache":
    *Tools > Options > Advanced > Network > Cached Web Content: "Clear Now"
    "Remove Cookies" from sites causing problems:
    *Tools > Options > Privacy > Cookies: "Show Cookies"
    Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode|Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions (Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Extensions) or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Appearance).
    *Do not click the Reset button on the Safe mode start window or otherwise make changes.
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes
    You can also check your security software (firewall) to make sure that if doesn't modify the user agent or otherwise makes the website think that you use a mobile connection.
    You can check the network.http.* prefs on the about:config page and reset all bold user set network.http prefs to the default value via the right-click context menu -> Reset.
    *http://kb.mozillazine.org/about:config

  • Taskflow region page full browser stretch

    how can i display contents of a page built using dropping a task flow as region on page in full browser window. how can i stretch the region to be displayed in full browser.
    My page has a panel form layout, does having a panel form layout cause problem while trying to stretch the contents to full browser window.
    Edited by: 963798 on Oct 14, 2012 8:47 PM

    http://jdevadf.oracle.com/adf-richclient-demo/docs/tagdoc/af_panelStretchLayout.html
    "If you try to put a component inside of this component and that child component does not support being stretched, then the component hierarchy is illegal. To make it legal, you need to insert another intermediate component between >this component and the child component. This intermediate component must support being stretched and must not stretch its children. An example of such a component that is commonly used for this purpose is <af:panelGroupLayout >layout="scroll">. By using a wrapper like this, you create a flowing layout area where nothing will be stretched inside of it. Examples of components that do not support being stretched inside of these panelStretchLayout facets (and >therefore need to be wrapped) include:
    <af:panelBorderLayout>
    *<af:panelFormLayout>*
    <af:panelGroupLayout layout="default">
    <af:panelGroupLayout layout="horizontal">
    <af:panelLabelAndMessage>
    <af:panelList>
    <trh:tableLayout>

  • Full Browser width slideshow ... can Muse do it (naitively)?

    Hi All,
    I'd like to place a full browser width slideshow into Muse.
    Is there a simple clean way to do this?
    I know there is a 'work around'  method (discussed at http://forums.adobe.com/message/5359472#5359472) , but I'd like to avoid it.
    Many Thanks!
    Gary

    Muse supports full screen slideshow since the release of Muse 7. Take a look at the video here - http://tv.adobe.com/watch/muse-feature-tour/adobe-muse-november-2013-new-fullscreen-slides how/.
    Muse 7 release notes - http://helpx.adobe.com/muse/release-note/adobe-muse-release-notes.html#November 13, 2013.
    Thanks,
    Vinayak

  • Full Browser Flash in firefox help

    Hello.
    first I'd like to say beforehand that i'm just an average
    timeline flash designer. not really deep into programming. and
    doesn't know any programming languages except PHP on an advanced
    level nothing more nothing less. I mean, I only use javascript via
    copy paste from a site that gives codes. so here's my question:
    I have made a full browser flash site, or so it was called
    (is that official? FBF?) my problem is, it doesn't work in firefox,
    i tried googling, it resulted to change the doctype to an older
    one, I did that, no progresss, delete the doctype enrtirely, did it
    too, still no progress. And, found some site that let's you insert
    css:
    <style type="text/css">
    HTML, BODY {height: 100%; width: 100%}
    </style>
    did it too but still no flaah in firefox. and oh, I have the
    plug-ins installed just fine. here's my html code:
    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0
    Transitional//EN">
    <html>
    <head>
    lines 1, 2, amd 3,
    and then to the flash part.:
    <body>
    <table width="100%" height="100%" border="0"
    cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <tr>
    <td height="50%"><object
    classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="
    http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=7,0,19,0"
    width="100%" height="100%">
    <param name="movie" value="flash/main.swf">
    <param name="quality" value="high">
    <embed src="flash/bg.swf" quality="high" pluginspage="
    http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"
    type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="100%"
    height="100%"></embed>
    </object><script type="text/javascript"
    src="ieupdate.js"></script></td>
    </tr>
    </table>
    </body>
    It works ok in IE and btw, I only know how to make a full
    browser flash by changing the size in the code from width="x" to
    width="100%" and height="x" to height="100%" basically, I just set
    any dimension i see in 100%. but of course I already created the
    flash movie size that extends to 1280 x 1024.
    can you help me please? I hope I enough info so you may
    tackle wherever I've gone wrong. Thanks!

    Any chance your video card might have "video" related settings that might be interfering?  While I'm not suggesting that you switch browsers, trying to reproduce this on another browser will give us a datapoint to see if this is firefox specific.  I would recommend giving both IE or Chrome a try to see if it still occurs.

  • No Optimized web browser support on basic phones after 8/30/13?

    Over the weekend I received a very disturbing message on my web browser. of my Samsung Gusto 2. It said that there would be no Optimized  web browser support on basic phones after 8/30/13 and that if I wanted a good web browsing experience that I would have to upgrade to a smartphone. I am on the $50 unilmited talk,text,and web prepay plan  but don'\t want to get stuck paying for a web browser I can't use after that date.A smartphone monthly plan would cost $10-20 more monthly,in addition to spending considerably more to buy a smartphone. I already have a tablet and was told a smartphone was unnecessary. Anybody else get this message?One person in customer service said that it was propaganda and not to believe it. Another person that I called later found the memo but had no further information on it at this time. Aparently Verizon likes to keep their customer service associates in the dark until last minute.No idea if they will alter their price plans in light of this development. I currently have AT&T U-Verse and will move my number to them and switch providers if forced to.They are willing to offer the same plan I currently have with Verizon but will have to buy a new  AT&T GoPhone.  Have had pretty good customer service with them up to now,but they are not open 24/7 for wireless customer service. Any comments?

    Hi Melissa
    Right now I am switching  back and forth between the Samsung Gusto 2 and the original Gusto. The reason I am doing this is because the Gusto ,even though it is an older phone, is in much better condition than the newer Gusto2. I want to use the beat-up Gusto2 for work, and  switch to the other phone when I need a more presentable phone.Also have  a Verizon Wireless CDM 7076(somewhere).
    Don't know why I am being forced to replace perfectly good phones. And yes,SydneyK, I could use my tablet for data,but it is a little cumbersome to take it out with me,but don't need it for my work . I just took it out for the first time recently to see how well it works on Wi-Fi hotspots(I don't have or want a data plan).Because I am a U-verse customer,I have access to 30,000 AT&T Wi-Fi hotspots AT NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE. I don't want to pay for something (web access)that I can't use on this phone. If Verizon can't give me cost-effective solutions,then I will be forced to transfer my number to AT&T Wireless as of August 30 for a GoPhone. AT&T wants my business and are wiling to do anything to satisfy me. Haven't had any trouble with Verizon either. Yes,  their customer service is still available 24/7 even thought you will have to wait a while sonetimes. I just hate the thought of having to go through the hassle of transferring my number to another carrier.
    Marc

  • What is the best practice for full browser video to achieve the highest quality?

    I'd like to get your thoughts on the best way to deliver full-browser (scale to the size of the browser window) video. I'm skilled in the creation of the content but learning to make the most out of Flash CS5 and would love to hear what you would suggest.
    Most of the tutorials I can find on full browser/scalable video are for earlier versions of Flash; what is the best practice today? Best resolution/format for the video?
    If there is an Adobe guide to this I'm happy to eat humble pie if someone can redirect me to it; I'm using CS5 Production Premium.
    I like the full screen video effect they have on the "Sounds of pertussis" web-site; this is exactly what I'm trying to create but I'm not sure what is the best way to approach it - any hints/tips you can offer would be great?
    Thanks in advance!

    Use the little squares over your video to mask the quality. Sounds of Pertussis is not full screen video, but rather full stage. Which is easier to work with since all the controls and other assets stay on screen. You set up your html file to allow full screen. Then bring in your video (netstream or flvPlayback component) and scale that to the full size of your stage  (since in this case it's basically the background) . I made a quickie demo here. (The video is from a cheapo SD consumer camera, so pretty poor quality to start.)
    In AS3 is would look something like
    import flash.display.Loader;
    import flash.net.URLRequest;
    import flash.display.Bitmap;
    import flash.display.BitmapData;
    import flash.ui.Mouse;
    import flash.events.Event;
    import flash.events.MouseEvent;
    import flash.display.StageDisplayState;
    stage.align = StageAlign.TOP_LEFT;
    stage.scaleMode = StageScaleMode.NO_SCALE;
    // determine current stage size
    var sw:int = int(stage.stageWidth);
    var sh:int = int(stage.stageHeight);
    // load video
    var nc:NetConnection = new NetConnection();
    nc.connect(null);
    var ns:NetStream = new NetStream(nc);
    var vid:Video = new Video(656, 480); // size off video
    this.addChildAt(vid, 0);
    vid.attachNetStream(ns);
    //path to your video_file
    ns.play("content/GS.f4v"); 
    var netClient:Object = new Object();
    ns.client = netClient;
    // add listener for resizing of the stage so we can scale our assets
    stage.addEventListener(Event.RESIZE, resizeHandler);
    stage.dispatchEvent(new Event(Event.RESIZE));
    function resizeHandler(e:Event = null):void
    // determine current stage size
        var sw:int = stage.stageWidth;
        var sh:int = stage.stageHeight;
    // scale video size depending on stage size
        vid.width = sw;
        vid.height = sh;
    // Don't scale video smaller than certain size
        if (vid.height < 480)
        vid.height = 480;
        if (vid.width < 656)
        vid.width = 656;
    // choose the smaller scale property (x or y) and match the other to it so the size is proportional;
        (vid.scaleX > vid.scaleY) ? vid.scaleY = vid.scaleX : vid.scaleX = vid.scaleY;
    // add event listener for full screen button
    fullScreenStage_mc.buttonMode = true;
    fullScreenStage_mc.mouseChildren = false;
    fullScreenStage_mc.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, goFullStage, false, 0, true);
    function goFullStage(event:MouseEvent):void
        //vid.fullScreenTakeOver = false; // keeps flvPlayer component from becoming full screen if you use it instead  
        if (stage.displayState == StageDisplayState.NORMAL)
            stage.displayState=StageDisplayState.FULL_SCREEN;
        else
            stage.displayState=StageDisplayState.NORMAL;

  • Still no full retina support, even with the new CC Apps?

    Hello over there!
    I just bought the full CC abo, after trying PS and Indesign and becoming a fan of the new workflow, that is possible with the upcoming new CC Apps (Muse, Edge Tools...).
    Now, after getting things right and downloading the needed Apps to my Macbook Pro (15" Retina) - I was very disappointed. The updated CC version of Dreamweaver and even some of the completely new Apps still have blurry text fields and buttons/layout graphics in it. Acrobat Pro XI is still a laggy, blurry fail on retina. The Mac OS Preview is sharp and scrolls a 600 pages PDF in seconds.
    I mean... Srsly? This would be okay if the retina MBP came out last month. But it came last year. I'm really a big fan of the Adobe workflow and functionality, this is why I upgraded and decided to spend some hundreds of dollars for it ( and become friends with the new and scary rent model ). But the best program is a pain, when your eyes start being overly stressed after 20 minutes of work, especially when you're already looking at hundres of code lines (And I'm 21 years old, so I'm glad to still have those good working eyes..). I remember when I fell totally in love with Dreamweaver because it was able to handle the amount of information in a good stucturized and clearly visible way. But the only really sharp and "look like it fits all together"-Apps are PS, AI and ID as far as I tried for now.
    Definitely affected are: DW, Muse, Edge Animate and Reflow (What? They are new!?)
    So, thats my question: Are there any official statements that this will be fixed? Im confused because Adobe is just partying about the retina-compatibility updates last fall/winter in blogs and descriptions. The blurry App elements are not mentioned. I really want to know this, to be able to take back my contract and abo in time and get a refund. Would be sad, but the only option to me.
    Thanks very much for reading and helping in advance. I really do not want to troll or sound agressive. The Adobe Suite is a very very big product and it does very good. But I'm simply disappointed about the handling of retina support, which is essential for users like me.
    English is not my main language, I hope everything was clear.
    Best regards,
    D. Fuchs

    Hi David,
    thank you for your effort. If I remember correctly you said you’ll also hand through this issue/question to the tech guys. Does this mean I’ll get further information? Because this article you found is about 10 month old and I’d like to get this issue verified.
    Furthermore, Acrobat (XI) is not even mentioned in that article and this is what brings the most problems.
    I really don’t like to be a stressing customer, but I think a official answer to this issue is definitely possible und should be made.
    I’ll attach a few hardcopy pictures of the issue. Don’t know if it helps, but it proofs.
    Thanks again and best regards,
    D. Fuchs
    Am 25.06.2013 um 01:17 schrieb David__B <[email protected]>:
    Re: Still no full retina support, even with the new CC Apps?
    created by David__B in Adobe Creative Cloud - View the full discussion
    Hi D.
    I found this http://blogs.adobe.com/creativelayer/new-macbook-pro-retina-display-su pport/
    I believe has been added to Photoshop, Illustrator and Lightroom so far. Hopefully it will be added to Dreamweaver soon too.
    Kind regards,
    -Dave
    Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at http://forums.adobe.com/message/5445698#5445698
    Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/5445698#5445698
    To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/5445698#5445698. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
    Start a new discussion in Adobe Creative Cloud by email or at Adobe Community
    For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go tohttp://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

  • Why isn't my browser supported?

    One of the challenges of delivering desktop-quality software
    inside a browser is, well, the browser itself. For more details on
    our approach to browser support, its challenges, etc. please see
    the posting on the Acrobat.com blog.
    http://blogs.adobe.com/acom
    Browsers aren't all the same, and there is a fair amount of
    work to get things working right, especially with keyboard
    shortcuts and the clipboard. We've focused on the most common
    browsers first: Firefox (Mac & Windows), Internet Explorer 6
    and 7, and Safari 3.
    For example: We’d like to follow convention and provide
    the typical Cmd-B shortcut to make text bold. However, Firefox on
    the Mac uses Cmd-B to open bookmarks in the sidebar; so Buzzword
    was forced to use Ctrl-B for making text bold.
    For
    Firefox under Linux, we're providing limited support. We
    have done some testing and we believe it works well, but we're
    interested in your feedback. Please be sure to upgrade to the
    latest Linux version of Flash Player 9 available at
    http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer,
    and also be sure to adjust your preferences as described in the
    initial page you'll see when visiting the application in Firefox
    under Linux.
    Other browsers may work (Opera, Camino, etc.) to some extent,
    but we can’t make assurances that all functions will work.
    We appreciate hearing from users who want to give Buzzword a
    spin under non-supported browsers, as it helps us focus our efforts
    and testing.

    Hi,
    After trying Opera AND Firefox to post a reply to "Why isn't my browser supported?" I'm now using IE (7 not 8 - that's not working, too!). Maybe that's the first thing that should work in all browsers - the forum.
    The second thing, and that's why I originally wanted to post something here, is that I had problems typing "&" and "/" in Opera. They don't seem to be at the same key as usual. (I have a german keyboard...):
    Shift + ^1234567890ß´
    Key (normal):   °!“§$%&/()=?`
    Key (buzzword): ^!@#$%^&*()ß`
    Additionally everything seems a little bit slow...
    Regards,
    Ireen

  • Multiple Browser Support in Webcenter

    What are the code changes that are to be made to have Multiple browser support in Webcenter?
    what is done in Webcenter to provide to browser independent UI
    e,g in jsp , we usually write javascript
    if browser is this, do this
    else do this
    kind of logic

    Even When I use JSTL and have modified the code to the following
    <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
    <jsp:root xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page" version="2.1"
    xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
    xmlns:c="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core"
    xmlns:fn="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/functions"
    xmlns:af="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/rich">
    <jsp:directive.page contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8"/>
    <f:view>
    <af:document id="d1">
    <af:form id="f1">
    <c:choose>
    <c:when test="${fn:containsIgnoreCase(header('User-Agent'), 'MSIE 6.0')}">
    <c:out value="Its IE6"/>
    </c:when>
    <c:otherwise>
    <c:out value="Its others"/>
    </c:otherwise>
    </c:choose>
    </af:form>
    </af:document>
    </f:view>
    </jsp:root>
    i get error on compile that says
    Error(12,16): The function "header" for prefix "" can not be found in the specified tag library.

  • Full browser external preloader

    I have a preloader and on completion it loads an external .swf. My external swf has full browser actionscript. How can I get the external PRELOADER to load the external swf and retain its full browser settings?
    This is my preloader actionscript:
    var l:Loader = new Loader();
    l.contentLoaderInfo.addEventListener(ProgressEvent.PROGRESS, loop);
    l.contentLoaderInfo.addEventListener(Event.COMPLETE, done);
    l.load(new URLRequest("tester.swf"));
    function loop(e:ProgressEvent):void
    var perc:Number = e.bytesLoaded / e.bytesTotal;
    percent.text = Math.ceil(perc*100).toString();
    function done(e:Event):void
    removeChildAt(0);
    percent = null;
    addChild(l);

    I did that, the external swf still loads at the movie size as opposed to the full width/height of the browser

  • PLAYSTATION 3 Browser support

    My Playstation 3 Browser dos not show all streams in Flash
    Player....
    Youtube...does but not others
    Why does nor ABODE support PS3 Browser for all streams???? :(
    Realy apreciated!
    thanks!

    Hi John,
    You can check the Product Availability Matrix for browser support at http://service.sap.com/pam
    Regards,
    Leo

  • Does the iphone browser support java

    does the iphone browser support java?
    can it run java applets?

    No, there is no Java support in the iPhone. (There is javascript, but that's obviously quite different.)
    You can submit feedback to Apple: http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html

  • Full browser window

    Hi Guys
    I found a method of filling the full browser window, with
    footer always at bottom, that I used here:
    www.tragicallyunhip.net
    The method works a treat, but I wasn't happy with that design
    so I tried out something new here:
    www.tragicallyunhip.net/temp
    And here I added a little extra, wanting to have the gradient
    on top and bottom like I do.
    If you view it in IE7 all is well. In FF, not so much. I
    added two divs around the table which fills the screen, and this is
    the issue. In FF it isn't filling the screen, despite the fact that
    the two DIVS (one to house the top half's background image, the
    other to house the bottom half's) are wrapping around a table
    which, when left alone like in the first example, fills width and
    height perfectly.
    I am hoping there is a fix for this.... I like this idea and
    would love to have it work out. I tried having the bottom
    background fill a footer cell in the table (like the footer in the
    first example) instead of a wrapper DIV, and while it fills the
    screen, I can't then get it to go behind the main content like I
    want to.
    Andy

    I might have fixed it...
    http://www.tragicallyunhip.net/temp/index2.html
    Can someone tell me how ohrribly broken this is in IE6, if at
    all? Or any other issues.
    Thanks
    Andy

  • Getting full ZFS support under Solaris 10 3/05

    Hello,
    I have Solaris 10 3/05, and would like to get full ZFS support as easy as possible (ie, without installing all the patches I can get through smpatch).
    Is it sufficient to add the 122640-05 patch (which is in the recommended cluster) and follow the instructions at the end of its readme file : "To get the complete zfs feature please also install the following patches... ... ..." ?
    Would it be compatible with my old install of Solaris 10 (3/05) ?
    Or is there a special cluster that would add all the ZFS support ?
    Thank you.
    fab

    You might be better off downloading solaris 10 11/06 and doing an upgrade install.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem Folders on my desktop are no longer showing any files inside

    I have been using windows 7 quite a bit lately, but I logged on snow leopard, and all the folders on my desktop are empty. They show that they are still trying to load what is in them, but nothing ever comes. this is obviously a huge problem as it cu

  • Mac Os 10.8.2 file Disappear !

    Hi every body, i downloaded Mac OS 10.8.2 from AppStore and it was Ok... the file was about 4.5GB, and i installed it and i am now running 10.8.2.. The probelm is : After downloading and installing it, the file DISAPPEARed ! ... i searched it every w

  • Copy and Paste from PDF Looses Formatting in SL

    Hi Everyone, I've discovered a strange problem in snow leopard. Prior to upgrading to snow leopard, I was able to copy and paste from a PDF in Preview into Word, save as a text file, and preserve the formatting of the original PDF. This was important

  • Delta cache Refresh shows error

    Hi, In SXI_CACHE I did Delta cache Refresh In XI RunTime Cache Status shows : 1. cache contants are up-to-date (Green light) 2. Error during last attempt to refresh cache(red error) Adapter Engine Connect Data Cache shows the following error 04D3344F

  • How to show definitions.

    Why doesn't Digital Editions show the definition of a word when the word is touched when using an Ipad?