Function create actual assessment cycle EC-PCA

Dear experts!
Now, I'm getting some issue about create actual assessment cycle EC-PCA. Really, I want to know the function that create actual assessment cycle EC-PCA (t.code 3KE1).
Help me, Please.
Best regards, Huy.

Hi,
You are mixing things. 9KE0 is used to post PCA documents - nothing to do with assessment cycles. You could use BAPI_PCA_BELEG_SAVEREPLICA function for this. There is no function/BAPI to create assessment cycle (3KE1).
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

Actual assessment cycles does not work

Hello.
I have a problem with actual assessment cycles.
I use KSU5 to run one cycle and when I run it in test mode it says that there is a sender and a receiver and that there are no errors, but when I run it without test mode it says that there are no senders nor receivers and no errors appear
Which could be the problem?
Thanks a lot!!

Hi,
Try these following things :-
a. Change the Receiving tracing factor in the header of the cycle from variable to fixed perct.
b. Check whether GL is assigned in Tcode OK17.
Rgds,
SAP Friend

Executing Actual Assessment Cycle (COPA) TCode KEUB

I am Executing Actual Assessment Cycle (COPA) TCode KEUB for the month of march in the month of May, In which month will that be reflected (March or May)... Is there any way to reflect that in the month of march (the month for which KEUB is run?

Hi,
as far as I know, if you are executing KEUB for march in may its posted in march's period. Try a test run (maybe for only one segment).
Best regards, Christian

BAPI to create/change assessment cycle

Dear ABAP expert ,
Anyone can advise the BAPI
- To Create cost center Actual/Plan assessment cycle (KSU1, KSU7)
- To Change cost center Actual/Plan assessment cycle (KSU2, KSU8), in case the cycle already exist and user would like to update tracing factor or change parameter in the cycle.
We try to avoid BDC as the screen is very dynamic.
Thank you
Anothai

Rob is correct.
Your other cross-posted threads will be deleted / locked.
Please read [the rules|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/home/rulesofEngagement] before posting again.
We don't have many rules here, but they are good ones.
Julius

Problem in Actual assessment cycle.

Hi Team,
We are using assessment cycle to distribute the cost from utility cost center to production cost center, after cycle execution we found the cost in debit side of the production cost center with assessment cost element. And also we are using the substitution is that the cost which is coming on the assessment cost element will flow to FICO reconciliation GL. We created 5 sets of assessment cost element groups( depreciation secondary cost element group, Admin OH, Store spares, Salary wages & power & Fuel) which correspond to five 9 series reconciliation accounts.
The 5 reconciliation GLu2019s are as follows:
1. Depreciation                90102003
2. Administrative overheads     90102004
3. Store spares.                90102005
4. Salary & wages                   90102006
5. Power water & fuel.           90102007.
After assessment cycles when FI team runs the transaction F.01 for the above GLu2019s the cost is appearing. Which is the consolidated cost which is distributed from utility cost centers is there any way to get the primary cost element wise breakup of the above five heads. This is the requirement raised by the FI team kindly advice.
Regards,
Ravi.

Hi Ravi,
have you come up with any solution?
I have found, we can use substitution rules in New GL- CO reconciliation to fix assessment issue. In fact, we have to maintain multiple substitution rules or table to get correct P&L by primary cost element. This is pretty much possible.
My issue is, we are using COPA. COPA dont have distribution option.
Let me know if anyone has better option than substitution. because I don't want to loose my primary cost element information.

Different functional areas during assessment cycles

We have an assessment cycle set up executed via KSU5.
We have the sender cost center assigned to functional area 300. In this case, the receiving cost center is also functional area 300.
All of the financial transactions (journal entries, invoices, goods receipts and depreciation posting) are all assigned to functional area 300.
However, when the assessment cycle is run, a portion of the credit to the sender cost center is assigning itself to functional area 200. I cannot tie this out to a single transaction or even a single (or combination of) cost elements.
What could be causing my credits to post to two different functional areas if all G/L accounts, all transactions and all affected cost centers are the same functional area?
Thanks
Josh

Thanks for the reply. I checked GGB1 and didn't see anything that would pertain to a substitution affecting functional area 200.
Are there any other places I should check?
Thanks
Josh

Actual Assessment Cycle - Multiple Segments for one Cost Center

Dear experts,
I've got one very important (for me) question:
I want to distribute a cost centers (primary) cost in two ways - at the same time:
   First: as a fixed value to three other cost centers and
   Second: the remaining cost shall be distributed to all cost centers of a cost center group
                with an statistical key figure.
Is it possible to distibute the remaining cost after a first distribution??
If yes, how is the procedure to do so?
Thank you very much in advance.
Ralf

Hi Ralf,
It's certainly possible; just create two steps, one after another, and you will achieve your goal.
Regards,
Eli

Any BAPI or FM for Assessment cycle create 3KE1 tcode

Hi,
Any BAPI or Function module to create actual assessment cycle 3KE1 tcode.
i am doing BDC for that currently. Anybody done this please send the coding for this.
thanks
Muthappan

Hi Muthappan,
Could you please send me some sample code you used to create Assessment Cycle / Distribution Cycle using the function module.
Many Thanks in advance
Soumen

Assessment Cycle for Planned Cost

Hi,
I have production cost centers and dept cost centers for which cost center planning has been maintained in KP06. I have maintained assessment cycle for planned costs with planned skf. When I run the cycle, system is apportioning the costs based on the factors maintained.
However on execution, without test tun, the system is posting the costs to the receiver cost centers as Actual Costs and not Planned Costs..
Can anyone tell me what is the reason?

Hi,
Have you created ur assessment cycle in T.Code: S_ALR_87005540 - Define Assessment for Plan cost (or) S_ALR_87005742 - Define Assessment for Actual cost. Assessment cycle execution t.code. KSUB for Plant cost posting. and KSU5 for actual cost posting.
If you define cycle in S_ALR_87005540, Please check have u select Plan (or) Actual Radio button
Thanks

Assessment cycle

Hi guys. I need help on how to create gl assessment cycle step by step. I created a cycle using FAGLGA11 but i keep getting an error message that the sender and receiver doesn't exist. Is there something that I am missing. My goal is to do profit center assessment to transfer costs from one cost center(service) to 8 cost centers (production) and post the costs into one GL account. Please help , its urgent.Thanks for your help.
Moderator: Please, read and respect the rules of SDN

Hi Sridhar,
You have defined is ok, further you have to give the selections in the Receiver Tracing Factor - Reveiver Rule / Var portion type.
You have the following options:
1. Receiver Rule - You want to transfer the variable portions / fixed amounts / fixed % etc.,
2. Var. Portion type - On what basis you want to split the sender amount from 201 to receiver cost center group Actual costs / plan costs / actual Statistical key figures / plan Statistical key figures.
Unless you dont do the selections it would not be able to identify the sender and receiver.
Regards,
Suraj

COPA Assessment Cycle - Segment Wise

Hello Friends,
Good Day!
I have created COPA Actual Assessment Cycle by T-Code KEU1. I have created around 5 Segments in that cycle. I want to execute the Assessment Cycle, but Segment Wise. I am trying to execute KEU5 and execute the Cycle. The assessment was properly as desired but for all Segment at once.
But if I want to execute this Cycle Segment Wise, is there any possible way to do that?
Many Thanks,
Pritesh Lodha

Dear Lodha,
Please try in the following manner which may suits your requirement:
Lock indicator available in Assessment cycles segment wise.
If you have many segments and want to run for few segments, you can use the lock indicator in assessment cycle T Code: KSU2
After locking the required segments you can run the assessment cycle using KEU5 by specifying the cycle name.
Cycle will consider the active segments only.
Regards,
Pavan Kumar Arvapally

Assessment Cycle - Posting affected in GL Account

Hi,
The users have created the assessment cycle, specifying the Sender and Receiver Cost Centers and the fixed percentages. After executing the assessment cycle, it is noted that one of the GL Accounts is getting impacted with the running of the assessment cycle and the postings are taking place in this GL Account, whereas by running the assessment cycle, there should not be any postings in the GL Account.
Could you please advise as to how what could be the reason and how can we check the same?
Thanks in advance for the assistance.
Regards

Hi Ashok,
Thanks for the feedback. As suggested by you, I have checked the Cost Element for the GL Account that is impacting the Finance and find that the Cost Element Category is 1, i.e. Primary Costs. I presume that you want me to check the Cost Element category of only that GL Account which is getting impacted.
Would really appreciate your help in assisting me to investigate the cause.
Regards

Runtime Analysis in PA Assessment Cycle

Dear All,
I have run an PA Assessment Cycle in with "Flow Trace On" and "Run Time Analysis On".I have a 3 part question
A) I seek your help in understanding the following and correct my understanding(stated in small brackets) if i am wrong
     1) Before Selection (Start Time of the Cycle)
     2) After Selection (Database Selection)
     3) After Iteration (???)
     4) After Oldkey (???)
     5) After Post (???)
     6) No Of Sender Values in Database (No of Senders in my Cycle and for which Master data exists in Database)
     7) No Of Receiver Values in Database ( No of Unique Combination of Receivers in the Database CE4XXXX table)
     8) No Of Allocating Senders (Out of the Senders stated in Point 6, No of Senders that are actually sending Values)
     9) No Of Allocating Senders (Out of the Senders stated in Point 7, No of Receivers that are actually receiving Values)
    10) No Of Line Items(???)
B) When i run the same Cycle in Test Run and Update run there is a huge difference in time and the Values for the items 6~10 points also differ( i am the only one working on the test system and there is no other data posted posted apart from this) so what is the reason for difference.
C) If i am running on a HANA COPA Accelerator, will the change in the receivers (stated below) have an impact on the read time (logically yes, but need some expert opinion also)
     1) No of Characteristics (Ex: Unitil now Profit Center alone, from now on PCTR, Product, Div, Dis Chl)
     2) No of Characteristics Values (Ex: Unitill Now PRTCR Values are A,B and C From now on it will be A~Z)
Request your valuable inputs. And my apologies for a very long question.
Thanks & Regards
Surya

Hi Gaurav,
Thanks for your comment. But that is not compliant to my question. I didn't do any configuration in KEPA and assign any characteristics groups for assessment cycle. However I really don't know why only one characteristics(Product:ARTNR) is suppressed and so I cannot input any value into that characteristics for actual assessment cycle.
I will appreciate your kindly help.
Best regards,
Ivan

Substitution Rule for Assessment Cycle

Hii All,
Can anybody suggest how do i define substitution rule for Assessment Cycle??
Reg
Umesh

I have created a assessment cycle thru KSU1 where i assigned SKF key , Thru SKF key i have to define allocation numbers with receiver cost centers but before that i have to set substitution rule for cycle.
All the common expenses booked under one common cost center
For eg. Expensed booked in GL series 3 - Common Cost Center
in Cycle - Assesment CEle start with 9
In FI - Common Exp GL start with 8
Above Example , when i run the cycle expenses will be allocated in 8 series with receivers cost center
Can ny1 suggest me how to do the process,how to define the rule
REg
Umesh

How to analyse the Receiver Tracing Factor in COPA Assessment cycle -KEU5

Hi
While executing the COPA Assessment cycle,we will get receiver tracing factor.My client wants to know how we got that.How can i analyse that Receiver tracing factor?Kindly advice me...
How can I recalculate the tracing factor for assesstment?
For example, Actual Assessment Cycle RS_A01 under Segment ITCMFG2AD uses Variable Portions Rule for Receiver tracing Factor with Value Field of 62 Sales.
The intent of this assessment was to be allocated based upon sales dollar values however when I review the test calculation, it appears the tracing factor is in billions of dollars when our monthly sales are in the million of dollars range.
Supriya

Hi,
If Receier Tracing Factor Rule is Variable Portion, then please also check the Receiver Weighting factor (the last tab in the assessment cycle, it normally is 100 for the receivers.
Secondly also check if there is different currency setting in CO Area & the Operating Concern which translates into different figures.
Hope this works.
Regards
Saket

Function create actual assessment cycle EC-PCA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for