Function or tcode to tick delivery completed in PO item for Mass processing

Hi All,
Is there any Function or tcode to tick delivery completed in Mass Processing?
Appreciate.
Nies

Hello,
Please use transaction MEMASSPO to set delivery completion indicator for several PO lines together.
Thanks,
Venu

Similar Messages

  • Tick Delivery Completed Indicator through MEMASSPO for STO's

    hi-
    We have a lot of old STO's which are about 8 -12 months old and are still showing as open for delivery due to short delivery.
    Now the project sites have closed and we dont have any stores or store keepers in the closed Sites.
    Can we run the Program MEMASSPO for STO's which are showing Items open for delivery to Tick the Delivery completed indicator this way?
    If not, what are the other available options to have the Tick indicator on the delivery completed Tab for STO's.
    Thanks in advance.
    Edited by: Srikanth BNV on Jan 23, 2010 12:11 AM

    before you do something with Masstransactions, you should always try to gain experience with manual maintenance e.g. in ME22N.
    By the way, you cannot close a STO with a delivery complete indicator. A STO is only considered as closed if you have received as much as was issued in the delivering plant.
    read OSS Note 196280 - Tolran. and finl deliv. indic. fr stck transp. ord.

  • Delivery completed indicator in PO for linked empties

    Dear All,
    in the cross-company PO we have several items. One of the items has the
    linked empties (sales and distribution BOM component) which is determined
    automatically in PO with item count 11 (if main item has the count 10 so BOM component has count 11 and next item is 20...30 etc.). When we post GR for this PO we have the Delivery completed indicator for all items
    except linked Empties (it seems because the linked Empties 11 are the
    part of the main item 10 and there is no GR for item 11). So after the GR
    we have PO still in the MD04 list for the linked empties.
    Is it possible to set Delivery complited indicator for Empties item of PO with standard functions?
    Thanks in advance
    Igor

    Hi,
    If you are in ERP 6 and Ehp4, you can use new message M7 433 (The Delivery Complete Indicator is set for the purchase order item) in connection with BAdI MB_GOODSMOVEMENT_DCI. If this message is configured as an error message. No further goods receipt can be posted for a PO item for which the delivery complete indicator is set.
    Since you are not working on Ehp4, you can use the BAdI to incorporate custom logic.
    Hope this is what you are looking for!
    Reetesh
    Edited by: Reetesh on Nov 25, 2011 8:20 AM

  • Delivery Complete field is disabled for service procurement

    Hi Support Team,
    When we are making Purchase Order against services with item category "D", delivery completed field is disabled.
    But when we are procuring against others it si enabled.
    In the case of Services how can we do completion. As we know we can do that while making service entry sheet by selecting " set delivery completed", but some time we may not be knowing that this is the final Service entry sheet.
    How to proceed in this case ?
    Regards
    Sai Krishna

    Sai,
    Have you checked the field settings for the below field selction keys, because the field status follows the link rule and priority is assigned based on that.
    Field selection keys:
    Transaction: E.g ME21N, ME32, ME33 etc.
    Activity Category: Create AKTH, Change AKTV, Display AKTA & Extend PO AKTE
    Document type: UBF for UB, NBF for NB
    Item category: is determined in combination with the document category.
    First two characters consist of letters PT, third item category and fourth document category:
    A for RFQs, B for PRs, F for POs, K for contracts, L for SAs. e.g PT3F for a SC item in a PO.
    Regards,
    Manish

  • Delivery Complete Flag in PO for Services

    Hi,
    For a Material or text PO when I make the GR for the total quantity, I get for that PO the flag in field Deliveri Complete for the item.
    This Flag doesn't exist when I use Item Category D - Services.
    Can I've this flag for this Item Category also?
    If not, how can I regard the Item for the PO as closed?
    I know that when i create the service entry sheet in ML81N i can check button Final Entry and than Accept the SES.
    Regards,
    BMMO.

    Hi
    For Services PO, we have activate at the Services Entry Sheet using below path:
    Services Entry sheet > Menu Entry Sheet> Set Status> Final Entry (Click).
    Once this Final entry icon is active, it is like short closing of balance open quantity.
    regards
    Prasanna

  • Link between Delivery Header & Sales Order Item for extraction to 2nd level

    Hi Guys ,
    I am having a requirement that need to pull the following data to 2nd level DSO
    1.  Delivery Header Data
    2. Sales Order Item data. ( Sales Document, Item, Item RDD, Material)
    So I am planning create a 2nd level DSO on top of Delivery header and need to pull the sales order ITEM level data ( Sales document , Order ITEM, ITEM RDD date , Material)  through start routine u2026
    How can I pull the Sales Order Item data through start routine?  i.e I need the link between Delivery Header & Sales Order Item Data .
    or I need the link between LIKP ( Delivery Header) Vs VBAP ( Sales Document Item).
    Thanks
    Edited by: krismady on Sep 22, 2010 2:26 AM
    or I need the link between LIKP ( Delivery Header) Vs VBAP ( Sales Document Item).

    Hi Krish,
    You can use VBLEN (Sales Document) to link Delivery header DS (2LIS_12_VCHDR) and Delivery item DS (2LIS_12_VCITM). Now In delivery item DS (2LIS_12_VCITM) you have VGBEL (Reference doc.) and VGPOS (Reference item) which is nothing but sales order document number and sales item in Order item DS (2LIS_11_VAITM) .
    So you need to link in above way to get other values in your DSO.
    It is proven method.
    Thanks,
    Uday Shankar.

  • URGENT: Delivery with multiple line items for a STO

    Hi Gurus,
    We ar ecreating deliveries using VL10b for a STO. Teh TSO has 40 - 50 line items. But the delivery is created with one line item only an dit creates a delivery for each line item. How cna we allow the inclusion of multiple line items in delivery?
    We are using delivery type NL an ditem categor is NLN.
    Geratly appreciate any help in that.
    Thanks,
    KHAN

    The problem you face is called 'Delivery split'.
    For the STO scenario, one common cause is different delivery dates (in the past) in the STO line items. If so, then you should refer to SAP Note 377501 (from where I quote below):
    You can implement the source code specified in the correction instructions in copy routine 301 (or a copy of this routine in the customer namespace). This correction ensures that when you transfer data form the preceding document, backlogged delivery dates or goods issue dates are set to the current date. This prevents the system form performing a delivery split.
    Then a rescheduling of the delivery occurs. Since forward scheduling occurs for backlogged delivery items (that is, the picking date or the transportation planning date is set to the current date), the manipulation of the delivery date or goods issue date in the copy routine does not affect the result of the scheduling.
    If the dates are not the problem, then this Note refers to other Notes which deal with this problem, and should definitely solve your problem.
    Regards
    Nikhilesh

  • How to complete refresh publication item for single client

    Is there any method how to force one client to completely refresh one of the publication items? I found just the ConsolidatorManager.completeRefresh(clientid, publication) which seems to force the client to refresh all publication items of a publication...

    i am using 2 internal table.
    my pgm code :
      SELECT
                 VORNR
                 ARBPL
                 FROM S022 INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB  
                                                              WHERE AUFNR = ITAB1-AUFNR.
            SORT ITAB BY VORNR.
            LOOP AT ITAB.
                SELECT SINGLE LTXA1
                                    FROM AFVC INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF ITAB 
                                                                       WHERE VORNR = ITAB-VORNR
                                                                              AND AUFPL = ITAB1-AUFPL.
           ENDLOOP.
    In SMARTFORM
    TABLE-MAIN
    LINE ITEM - COLUMN : I am selecting material, quantity, Unit individually in  coding part.
    SELECT MATNR
            BDMNG
            ERFME
             FROM RESB INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE MTAB
                                            WHERE VORNR = itab-vornr
                                              AND AUFNR = PRN.
    LOOP AT MTAB.
          SELECT SINGLE MAKTX
                        FROM MAKT INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF MTAB
                                                   WHERE MATNR = MTAB-MATNR.
    endloop.
    other than this four column further 6 columns also available in Main table, those entries are Manual .
    in program i tried to use 2 internal table like nested loop using count.
    i am getting last item only, not all line item.
    i hope now clear about my problem.

  • Issue in completing the block step for parallel processing

    Hi,
    i have created a workflow where in i have used a block step to send workitems to multiple agents.  I have used parallel processing in block step. Number of agents are determined in the runtime. Lets say i have two items in my multiple line container( two agent id). Now inside block statement i have put user decesion step. So at the same time workitems goes to the two approver for approval. When both approver take the decesion after that also command is not coming out of the block step. I want the command to be out of block step after this and goes to the next step of workflow.
    Please suggest any helpful solution for it.
    Regards,
    Smit Shah

    I think theremust be a binding problem , the binding must be some thing like the below
    &USERID[&_WF_PARFOREACH_INDEX&]& ----->&_USERID_LINE&
    of the block step from WF container to Block Conatiner. Because when I checked in my system it is behaving as you want., I also include one Decision step inside the block, and then hard coded the userid values int the table USERID and made the above binding and it ia working fine and in the Decision Agent I mentiond the EXPRESSION and assigned the value &_USERID_LINE&

  • Completing the block step for parallel processing

    Hello ,
    I"m  using a  ParForEach  block   .
    It works fine and  2   approves get their decision task  respectively ,
    I  want to end all parrallel  processes if one of the   approvers select the reject  option  .
    I  thought it could be done using the  End condition Option .
    I have defined an end condition    in  the tab  Parallel  Procesing  ,  the condition  is  an  element wf_result is set to REJECT
    was defined.
      But   nothing resulted and althogh i check  the container and the  element is correctly   assigned after one of the approvers
      rejects  the  other is still  sitting there.
    i  ran  the condiion evalate button  on  this step  with no   success .
    Please Advise

    Hi Rina
    In EHP4, there is the following workflows for Compensation:
    04000022 ECM_SUBMIT
    04000024 ECM_REJECT
    04000025 ECM_CREATE
    together with class CL_HRECM00_WORKFLOW_EVENT.
    There, the parallel processing is used.
    Best Regards
    Raquel

  • Reg.Delivery complete ticked problem

    Dear All
    Please help in this matter.
    In our partially goods received  Pos we ticked 'delivery complete' to prevent the further GRN.Using this ticked option how to prevent the further GRN.Then how to create system error message in OMCQ don't let the further GRN.
    Option 1 : Using the Latest GRN date option we can prevent the further GRN.
    Is there any possibility using the delivery complete ticked option can prevent the further GRN
    Thanks
    S.K Rajakumar

    Hi,
    Using Delivery Complete tick, you can not prevent the further GRN. By doing this, you only mark that you do not expect any further GRN & the PO should therefore not be considered for MRP. To prevent further GRN, change the PO quantity to actual quantity received.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Prashant

  • Delivery Complete for Framework Order

    Hi Everyone,
    My users use transaction ME2L and ME2M to figure out their month-end accruals.  With standard purchase orders, the option to tick "Delivery completed" field is available within the Delivery tab within the Item detail section of the PO.  With a framework po, there is no option available to use other than "Final invoice" within the Invoice tab of the item detail section of the PO.  Is this just a config issue that I need to unhide and make available.  The end result of all of this is to ensure that when running ME2L or ME2M is not to have these purchase orders appear.

    Hi Pavan,
    So if I have this right, the users need to run 2 separate reports in order to figure out their open PO's, 1 for standard orders (either ME2L or ME2M) and 1 for framework orders (ME2N)?  Seems tedious in that they would need to deipher which purchase orders to review with a particular tcode.
    What if I for a FO, were to "block" the item?  I noticed that doing so, my "Still to deliver" status becomes 0.  Does this have a financial effect or would this assist the users with being able to simply run ME2N with dynamic selections as follows:
    Purchase Document Item:
    <> X Delivery Completed
    <> X Final Invoice
    Would this work or would this only provide me PO's that are not marked as completed AND final invoice?
    Thanks,
    Pete

  • Delivery completed indicator in PO

    Hi team,
    What's the significance of delvirey completed indiocator in PO. Even if i choose this, able to do GR with MIGO.
    I hope my question is clear. Kindly respond

    Hi Prasad
    When u tick delivery complete indicator system will not consider that Po as Open Qty. which u can check in MMBE stock overview
    Where open Qty is reduced..u can check this
    first try to check stock w/o delivery complete indicator
    And then after ticking Delivery complete indicator
    ( Note that here PO balance qTY SHOULD BE more than 1)
    As the PO is not closed, system allows you to do GR for the rest of the quantity.
    If u don't want system to allow pass GR once indicator is ticked u need to delete line item
    Hope this will clear ur doubt
    revert for any clarification
    Vishal...

  • Delivery Complete Indicator in PO

    Dear Experts ,
    I have manually ticked the delivery complete indicator in the delivery Tab in the PO .
    I had ordered 100 qty . Did the gr for 50 & now i dont expect any delivery.
    But when i try to do a GR  against the PO ,the system still allows to proceed & shows 50 qty as open for GR .
    Why should it be so ?
    As i have marked the delivery complete indicator , the system should not allow mw to do any further GRs  .
    Pls give ur inputs
    Regards
    Anis

    Hi
    Please note that delivery complete indicator is meant for making the open order quantity as 0 so that during MRP run it should not consider the PO for the planning purpose, but still PO is open for balance quantity.
    If you wish not to do any GR for that PO, then in PO itself you need to ammend the quantity as 50 so that system will automaticaly put delivery complete and no GR can be done further.
    Rgds
    Srini

  • Delivery Completed Indicator for Services

    Hi Guys
    In PO's, in the delivery tab, the Delivery Completed Indicator appears only for Stock PO's. Is it possible to make the Delivery Completed Indicator appear for non stock PO's as well, I mean for services?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    It is not possible to setup Delivery Completed Indicator For Services Purchase orders or Non stock Items.
    Reg,
    Ashok
    Rewards welcome.

Maybe you are looking for

  • I'm hostage: Can synch Ipod with 5.0 but not 6.0

    I posted about this issue before, but want to resurrect the issue as there is definately a problem with the Itunes 6.0 and my Ipod and there must be others out there.. I managed to find a 5.0 version so I un-installed 6.0 and re-installed 5.0, Now I

  • Item Category check on Order Level

    Dear Friends! I want to restrict the item category on order level or disable the fields so that, no one can change the item category. Please share your experience! Regards Anwer Waseem

  • Tcode MIRO with BADI: MRM_HEADER_CHECK

    Hi, in MIRO i will use badi: MRM_HEADER_CHECK. i implementedt it and use in method: IF_EX_MRM_HEADER_CHECK~HEADERDATA_CHECK this code:   DATA: GT_ERRPROT    TYPE TABLE OF MRM_ERRPROT,         GS_ERRPROT    TYPE          MRM_ERRPROT.   APPEND GS_ERRPR

  • Conceal data in LOV

    How to mask a field which is part of LOV. i.e. when i click on LOV button filed A needs to be masked and display masked , but other must be displayed normal. LOV FieldA FieldB FieldC **** B1 C1 **** B2 C2 Thanks, Swapnesh

  • Difference between the 3 syntax

    Hi all, Can anyone tell me the difference between the 3 syntax of using the application items? 1. &APP_ITEM_NAME. 2. :APP_ITEM_NAME 3. #APP_ITEM_NAME# Where these 3 syntax are specifically used? Do answer me. Thanks & Regards, Sunil Bhatia