Functional Acknowledgement Version

Two questions about B2B automatic functional acknowledgements:
1. What version of CONTRL does B2B produce if FA Handled Automatically is set to Yes in 11.1.1.6 in an EDIFACT exchange?
2. Can the content of the CONTRL message to be produced be configured?
Thanks

1. What version of CONTRL does B2B produce if FA Handled Automatically is set to Yes in 11.1.1.6 in an EDIFACT exchange? CONTRL version D3 is used for single transaction and version 4.1 is used for batches.
2. Can the content of the CONTRL message to be produced be configured?No. You may indicate B2B to generate envelope parameters for CONTRL as per incoming request but you cannot modify the data. To have customized CONTRL, disable the FA Handled By B2B option in the agreement and preapare & send the FA from back-end.
Regards,
Anuj

Similar Messages

Handling Functional Acknowledgement only in case of transaction exception

Hi ,
We have requirement to acknowledge client with only exception transactions. How can we handle this with B2B?
I have used the Functional Acknowledge concept wherein for Acknowledging EDI transactions, we are using Control D3 message format and moving the acknowledgement message to another JMS Queue.
But the acknowledgements/Control EDI messages are getting generated for both success as well as error cases and there is no way to distinguish between them. How can I restrict this to only Error cases.
Basically flow is like EDI Message Format --> JMS Queue --> B2B
--> (in success case) XML generated in B2B_IN_Queue (no ack required)
--> (in error case) generate CONTRL D3 message and send it to another JMS Queue.
Pls help.
Regards
Aparna

Hi All,
Can anyone pls answer my question?
Regards
Aparna

Functional acknowledgement posting to PO confirmation tab

Hi Gurus,
Can anbybody please throw some light on the followin scenario.
is it possible to have the functional acknowledgement posted to the confirmation tab of the PO. If so what kind of confirmation control key has to be used and other settings that will make it such that i can see the functional acknowldegement show up on the PO confimations tab.
Thee way we envision to do this is,
1) we send the PO to the vendor
2) vendor sends us back 997 - now this message should some how get posted to PO confriamtion and not just stop at we05 tcode level.
3) next is our order confirmation - which is the 855 frpom the vendor (ORDRSP)
4) then next we will have ASN or 856 etc etc.
steps number 3 and 4 we do not have any problem. we are fine.
we want to have step 2 done .
so at the end of the day when i look at he po confirmations tab, i should see three confirmation control keys.
first one for 997, second one for 855 and third one for 856. please help
Thanks
Anusha

OK. thanks for the reply. here is where we need to go more in detail. This is how i cuurently have assigned.
in external confirmation category node of the menu path in config, i have
AB -order acknowledgement
LA - Inbound delivery.
now in the internal confirmation category node of the menu path, i have assigned
order acknowledgement - AB - order acknowledgement
Shipping notification - LA - inbound delivery.
now in the node of setup confirmation control i have specified AB as the first sequence and LA as the second sequence.
Now the question is if i want to receive 997 updated on the confirmation tab of the PO, shouldn't i define another key like AB, which is for 997 and then place it first in the sequence of confirmation category. Now what should be the key that i should define or create in external confirmation categories node of the menu path such that it will act like 997.
The business wants 997 updated onthe PO becuase they do not want to rely on the van provider to dtermine that the document was trasnimitted and received succseffully by the vneodr
Thanks
ANusha

EDI 997 - Functional acknowledgement

Hi,
Our requirement is to send and recieve functional acknowledgement through EDI.
What is functional Acknowledgement?
Can any one help me out in using functional acknowledgement?What is the message type and functional modules involved for processing functional acknowledgement.Once I recieve a funtional acknowledgement where should that data be updated?
Any help in this regard would be appreciated.
Regards,
Nagaraju Donikena.

Swapnil Bachal thanks for your help.This would be helpful when I recieve functional acknowledgement from my vendor.
Now my other requirement is that when ever I recieve a purchase order from my vendor I need to send 997 and also create the sales order for the PO recieved.I understand that for any inbound idoc I can configure process code which is attached to some Function module.SAP has provided with a standard function module which would create a sales order for the PO recieved.Could you please advice on how to send the 997 simultaneously.
Regards ,
Nagaraju Donikena.

Re sending Functional acknowledgement 997

Gurus please help,
We are using seeburger with AS2 adapter. How can I resend a functional acknowledgement from PI or Seeburger or Runtime work bench? Please explain the steps.
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Pavan

Hi,
Did you checked my blog..
/people/rajeshkumar.pasupula/blog/2009/08/05/wanna-implement-seeburger-for-edi-find-the-booster
here i am using file adapter in place of file use AS2..
HTH
Rajesh

Functional acknowledgment 997 reconcilation

Hello Experts.
I have gone through the below blogs.
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-46260
There is a limitation for this approach if you are sending multiple Functional Groups and /or Transaction Sets in a single EDI Message.
My requirement is that I want Functional acknowledgment 997 reconciliation.
Can you please suggest any other way to achieve this .
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Advit Ramesh

Hi Tom !
Try this BAPIs:
IDOC_STATUS_CONVERT
IDOC_STATUS_WRITE_TO_DATABASE
Regards,
Matias.
PD: please award points if helpful

997 Functional Acknowledgment update to SAP IDOC

When a 997 returns to my BizTalk system I want to update the status code on the IDOC that was sent to the trading partner. First question is which BAPI would I use to update the status code on the IDOC in SAP. Second question is what is the unique identifier in the 997 Functional Acknowledgment that is returned to me to know which IDOC status code to update.
Thanks,
Tom

Hi Tom !
Try this BAPIs:
IDOC_STATUS_CONVERT
IDOC_STATUS_WRITE_TO_DATABASE
Regards,
Matias.
PD: please award points if helpful

Oracle financials functional differences version wise eg :11.5.3.... etc..

HI,
ALL,
i appreciate if anyone of you can recomend me where i can find the functionality differences of oracle financials functional module version wise, eg : 11.5.3 vs 11.5.6 vs 11.5.9 vs 11.5.10.2
you can e-mail me : [email protected]
-sujay

Check Note: 215868.1 - 11i Release Notes
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=215868.1

Functional acknowledgement by B2B

Hi
When I am setting Operational capabilities for remote TP
I have seen following options
i) Functional acknowledgement required
ii) Is acknowledgement handled by Integration B2B
Can anybody tell how above both differs...?
Aren't they same...?

Hi
I am using "Custom Document Over Internet" business protocol
In the tutorial I read as
"Is Functional acknowledgement required ? feature is applicable only for Business protocols that include the EDI X12 or EDI EDIFACT document protocol. It does not apply to business protocols using the Custom Document protocol like UCCnet even though you set to YES."
so if the above statement is correct then "Is Functional acknowledgement required " optioin is irrelevant to my case
so obviously according to your update "Is ACK handled by B2B" is relevant only if
"Is Functional acknowledgement required ? " set to "Yes"
So in that case I dont need to worry about these options for my business protocol
Custom Document Over Internet"
Am I right ?
Please confirm...

Functional Acknowledgement varying version

Hi Gururs,
We are using OAG BODs for B2B Communications.
The document version is 9.0; and we are allowing B2B to collaborate the message acks.
Is it possible to use the Confirm BOD (Ack) to be of version 7.2 despite the documents (e.g. PO, POCO) being 9.0; and not requiring us to go to the middleware layer, but allow b2b to correlate?
Regards,
Sambhav

Hi Sambhav,
You may send CBOD of different version but from middleware and instead of FA, it should be treated like a response message at B2B layer. You can have content based correlation at B2B layer as well.
Regards,
Anuj

Firefox 4 is unquestionably disfunctional; where can I download a functional older version?

Your version 4 is extremely lagging on my XPS laptop. The laptop has 2 gig of ram and a duel core.
Firefox 4 has crashed and seized up my computer more often and worse than any browser I have ever used--I can officially state the I loath Firefox 4. Utter disappointment!
Where can I find a download for the previous version? How can I safely revert back to the previous version?
I have not recorded the crash ID's, but have repeatedly submitted report with no feedback forthcoming.
Thank-you. I look forward to being able to use my computer effectively again soon.
JD

i am sad that the only response you have had is one that does nothing to help you with what you asked for.
you asked a simple question.
can nobody give you an answer ?
the question for those that can not understand what was needed was where can they find a link to download something previous to firefox 4.
they did NOT ask anything about hardware acceleration or ANYTHING else.

Functional Acknowledgement in BPEL

Hi,
I have a source BPEL , BPEL A which will insert the record into a target table and should sleep. There is BPEL B which will poll the target table and process the record which BPEL A has put. As soon as the BPEL B is finishes processing the record BPEL A shold resume and complete the process ( To ensure that the record has been processed successfully ). Is there any way that BPEL B acknowledge BPEL A that the record has been processed? ( In real conditions BPEL A can put record into a table and the record passes multiple tables and finally reaches the target table, can BPEL A wait till that record successfully reach the target.)
Thanks,
Ramesh

Yes you can. Process A should have a Receive activity on the client partnerlink with a differernt operation . It wil wait on this activity for a message. Process B should Invoke Process A on this operation and send the message.
You should use your own correlation-set to pass the correct message from B to the A. The correlation should on be defined on process A.
http://orasoa.blogspot.com/2006/07/bpel-correlation-this-usefull-article.html
Marc

Rejecting functional acknowledgement before reaching PI. (incoming EDI)

Hi Friends,
Scenario is EDI (X12 format)<-> PI <-> IDOC (Shipment notification)
Requirement is we need to send reject acks (997) if the sending X12 doesn't have item details.
This has to be accomplished at Seeburger level and should not reach PI. (bcause if it reaches PI then sender (EDI) assumes that we already picked up the file using the splitter adapter)
Any inputs is grtly appreciated.
Regards,
Pavan

Solved,
We are making changes in the BIC mappings in Seeburger.

I have lost my Norton log-in function and safe site feature since downloading the new, and not so good in my opinion, version of Mozilla Firefox, and I want theses features back so how do I get them back?

I downloaded and installed the latest MF version, but now I have lost my Norton funtions in the bar under the address bar.
Safe site and log-in. I want my Norton features back please so what do I have to do to get this?
I'm not happy at losing these features and am not at all pleased with your so called improvements and wished you had left things alone, everything was working fine before.
Help me get back my Norton functions.

Norton Version 5.0 works with Mozilla 4.0 with a patch from Norton. I went to Norton help tab, chat line, and Norton assistant took over my computer, upgraded my Norton version 3.0, and installed the patch free of charge. all problems solved.

Adapter Modules & split 997 channel reqd for splitting Edi and Acknowledgement

Hi,
I am using PI 7.11 with B2B add-on installed.We will be using AS2 adapters ,as of now
configured file adapters in place of it.
This B2B scenario does not consists of Party because 1 sender and 1 receiver system is involved as of now.
May be client provides identifiers details and include party.
In my previous B2B scenario(PI 7.3) involving Seeburger , AS2 channel was configured with(image shown below)
SeeClassifier,BIC, message splitter modules and Split997 channel for splitting EDI PO and Functional Acknowledgement.
What are the adapter modules that will be required in case of B2B add on (PI 7.11)and does it requires
EDI separator channel for splitting EDI doc & Func Ack.What can be the other probable issues.
How we will monitor the messages and Ack once its implemented end to end?
Regards,
Mayank Yadav

Hey Mayank,
Inbound Scenario configuration: (3 step)
1) Sender AS2 (EDI messages) -----> EDI separator receiver (no mapping required here; EDI separator is used to split bulk EDI messages and configure acknowledgements (997) if required)
2) EDI separator sender (with message type(eg.850),version and sender ID/receiver ID configuration; here X12convertor module is used to change raw edi into XML) ----> Idoc or any receiver channel (inbound)(here you have your actual mapping)
(if 997 is configured as requested in the first step; then you need to handle the 997 generated by EDI separator)
3) EDI separator sender (997 message type,version,reverse combination of sender ID,receiver ID) to Receiver AS2 ( no modules required pass through)
Outbound Scenario configuration
1) sender channel (say Idoc) to AS2 receiver (requires mapping)
997 file can be sent back by partners (EDI 997 as acknowledgement)
this will be taken care like any other inbound message) which can be then converted to SYSTAT IDOC or so to track the status of outbound message.
B2B status tab in PI monitoring helps you track acknowledgements
Hope this answers your question:
What are the adapter modules that will be required in case of B2B add on (PI 7.11)and does it require
EDI separator channel for splitting EDI doc & Func Ack.What can be the other probable issues.
How we will monitor the messages and Ack once its implemented end to end?
For detailed information on this; please refer Functional Acknowledgement (Inbound and Outbound FA 997)- for Beginners
Regards,
Pooja

Functional Acknowledgement Version

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for