Functional acknowledgment 997 reconcilation

Hello Experts.
I have gone through the below blogs.
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-46260
There is a limitation for this approach if you are sending multiple Functional Groups and /or Transaction Sets in a single EDI Message.
My requirement is that I want Functional acknowledgment 997 reconciliation.
Can you please suggest any other way to achieve this .
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Advit Ramesh

Hi Tom !
Try this BAPIs:
IDOC_STATUS_CONVERT
IDOC_STATUS_WRITE_TO_DATABASE
Regards,
Matias.
PD: please award points if helpful

Similar Messages

Re sending Functional acknowledgement 997

Gurus please help,
We are using seeburger with AS2 adapter. How can I resend a functional acknowledgement from PI or Seeburger or Runtime work bench? Please explain the steps.
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Pavan

Hi,
Did you checked my blog..
/people/rajeshkumar.pasupula/blog/2009/08/05/wanna-implement-seeburger-for-edi-find-the-booster
here i am using file adapter in place of file use AS2..
HTH
Rajesh

Processing functional acks (997s)

Is that possible to process inbound 997s through Middleware from B2B and have B2B generate automatically 997s for outbound.
That means, for the transactions which we receive from the customer let B2B generate functional acks (997s) automatically and for the transactions which we send and functional acknowledgements (997s) which we receive from the customer should be processed through middleware.
I know we have at agreement level to specify for the functional acks but I am not sure is that possible to differentiate that for inbound 997s to be processed from B2B to middleware and for outbound 997s, let B2B handle automatically. Pls advise.
Regards,
Suneel Jakka

Suneel,
Yes, it is possible. In your outbound EDI agreement, enable the "Functional Ack" and select "No" in "FA Handled by B2B" drop-down. Note that "FA Handled by B2B" drop-down has three options - None, Yes and No. For passing inbound 997 to middleware, you must select "No".
In inbound EDI agreement, select "Yes" in "FA Handled by B2B" drop-down and B2B will handle the 997 automatically.
Regards,
Anuj

EDI 997 - Functional acknowledgement

Hi,
Our requirement is to send and recieve functional acknowledgement through EDI.
What is functional Acknowledgement?
Can any one help me out in using functional acknowledgement?What is the message type and functional modules involved for processing functional acknowledgement.Once I recieve a funtional acknowledgement where should that data be updated?
Any help in this regard would be appreciated.
Regards,
Nagaraju Donikena.

Swapnil Bachal thanks for your help.This would be helpful when I recieve functional acknowledgement from my vendor.
Now my other requirement is that when ever I recieve a purchase order from my vendor I need to send 997 and also create the sales order for the PO recieved.I understand that for any inbound idoc I can configure process code which is attached to some Function module.SAP has provided with a standard function module which would create a sales order for the PO recieved.Could you please advice on how to send the 997 simultaneously.
Regards ,
Nagaraju Donikena.

997 Functional Acknowledgment update to SAP IDOC

When a 997 returns to my BizTalk system I want to update the status code on the IDOC that was sent to the trading partner. First question is which BAPI would I use to update the status code on the IDOC in SAP. Second question is what is the unique identifier in the 997 Functional Acknowledgment that is returned to me to know which IDOC status code to update.
Thanks,
Tom

Hi Tom !
Try this BAPIs:
IDOC_STATUS_CONVERT
IDOC_STATUS_WRITE_TO_DATABASE
Regards,
Matias.
PD: please award points if helpful

Functional acknowledgement posting to PO confirmation tab

Hi Gurus,
Can anbybody please throw some light on the followin scenario.
is it possible to have the functional acknowledgement posted to the confirmation tab of the PO. If so what kind of confirmation control key has to be used and other settings that will make it such that i can see the functional acknowldegement show up on the PO confimations tab.
Thee way we envision to do this is,
1) we send the PO to the vendor
2) vendor sends us back 997 - now this message should some how get posted to PO confriamtion and not just stop at we05 tcode level.
3) next is our order confirmation - which is the 855 frpom the vendor (ORDRSP)
4) then next we will have ASN or 856 etc etc.
steps number 3 and 4 we do not have any problem. we are fine.
we want to have step 2 done .
so at the end of the day when i look at he po confirmations tab, i should see three confirmation control keys.
first one for 997, second one for 855 and third one for 856. please help
Thanks
Anusha

OK. thanks for the reply. here is where we need to go more in detail. This is how i cuurently have assigned.
in external confirmation category node of the menu path in config, i have
AB -order acknowledgement
LA - Inbound delivery.
now in the internal confirmation category node of the menu path, i have assigned
order acknowledgement - AB - order acknowledgement
Shipping notification - LA - inbound delivery.
now in the node of setup confirmation control i have specified AB as the first sequence and LA as the second sequence.
Now the question is if i want to receive 997 updated on the confirmation tab of the PO, shouldn't i define another key like AB, which is for 997 and then place it first in the sequence of confirmation category. Now what should be the key that i should define or create in external confirmation categories node of the menu path such that it will act like 997.
The business wants 997 updated onthe PO becuase they do not want to rely on the van provider to dtermine that the document was trasnimitted and received succseffully by the vneodr
Thanks
ANusha

Functional Ack - 997

Hi,
Here is a scenario,
B2B is configured to send functional acknowledgement automatically. The Exchange Protocal being used is EDI X12 over generic exchange. Few of our customers require 997s for POs(850) Invoices(810) and ASNs(856).
There is an element called "Funcitonal Identifier Code" which has to be populated in GS-01 and AK1-01
Now the problem is:
1. This element is not getting populated in AK1-01.
2. Though this gets populated, the requirement is that this value is different from the one in GS-01. In GS-01 now its FA, and the value in AK1-01 should be PO.
Please let me know if any settings have to be made to get this AK1-01. I kno w that we can set the value in Document Definition parameters for GS01.
Thanks,
Phani

Hello Phani,
Interesting question. Ideally AK1 is used to respond to the functional group header and to start the acknowledgement for a functional group. There shall be one AK1 segment for the functional group that is being acknowledged. This is how
it should work.
1. The incoming business document has one Functional Identifier in the Group which is Code identifying a group of application related transaction sets. Ideally B2B gets this value from the business document and populate in the AK1-01 of
the Functional Acknowledgement. We have tested this in our environment using the default tutorial comes with the product.
2. If you still want to populate something different than the one in the incoming Business document- Functional Group Identifier code , even though it may not be a practical use case you can do this by generating the 997 in the Back end
application and have B2B to translate to EDI and post it to TP.
P.S GS-01 of the FA is not to do anything with AK1-01 of FA, where as AK1-01 of FA is same as GS-01 of Incoming business messages. A sample FA generated is as follows.
ISA~00~ ~00~ ~ZZ~Acme ~ZZ~GlobalChips ~071022~0933~U~00401~000001001~0~P~+'GS~FA~Acme~GlobalChips~20071022~0933~1001~X~004010'ST~997~1001'AK1~PO~1'AK2~850~0001'AK5~A'AK9~A~1~1~1'SE~6~1001'GE~1~1001'IEA~1~000001001'
HTH.
Rgds,Ramesh

Handling Functional Acknowledgement only in case of transaction exception

Hi ,
We have requirement to acknowledge client with only exception transactions. How can we handle this with B2B?
I have used the Functional Acknowledge concept wherein for Acknowledging EDI transactions, we are using Control D3 message format and moving the acknowledgement message to another JMS Queue.
But the acknowledgements/Control EDI messages are getting generated for both success as well as error cases and there is no way to distinguish between them. How can I restrict this to only Error cases.
Basically flow is like EDI Message Format --> JMS Queue --> B2B
--> (in success case) XML generated in B2B_IN_Queue (no ack required)
--> (in error case) generate CONTRL D3 message and send it to another JMS Queue.
Pls help.
Regards
Aparna

Hi All,
Can anyone pls answer my question?
Regards
Aparna

How to set the AS2 fileName for outbound Functional Ack 997 auto generated by Oracle B2B

Hi Friends,
How to set the AS2 fileName for outbound Functional Ack 997 auto generated by Oracle B2B.
External Trading Partner is sending the EDI 856 via AS2 URL to our Oracle B2B Server.
In the inbound 856 agreement, we have checked the option of Funtional Ack and also Functiona Ack handled by B2B is yes.
We have the outbound agreement which is sending that Functional ack 997 (auto generated by oracle b2b) and we have specified the Outbound AS2 channel of the Partner.
997 doc is being sent to external partner using AS2 channel, but the filename is generating as '40101'.
Please can you let me know how to set the AS2 fileName for outbound Functional Ack 997 auto generated by Oracle B2B.
Appreciate your valuable answers!!
Thanks,
Amirineni

Amirineni,
AFAIK, there is no option to set the file name when the 997 is generated automatically by B2B.
Alternatively, if this is a must requirement, you can generate the FA from backend and send to B2B with MSG_TYPE =9. In this case, you can set the header with filename (How to set the actionname property in B2B 11g)

Functional acknowledgement by B2B

Hi
When I am setting Operational capabilities for remote TP
I have seen following options
i) Functional acknowledgement required
ii) Is acknowledgement handled by Integration B2B
Can anybody tell how above both differs...?
Aren't they same...?

Hi
I am using "Custom Document Over Internet" business protocol
In the tutorial I read as
"Is Functional acknowledgement required ? feature is applicable only for Business protocols that include the EDI X12 or EDI EDIFACT document protocol. It does not apply to business protocols using the Custom Document protocol like UCCnet even though you set to YES."
so if the above statement is correct then "Is Functional acknowledgement required " optioin is irrelevant to my case
so obviously according to your update "Is ACK handled by B2B" is relevant only if
"Is Functional acknowledgement required ? " set to "Yes"
So in that case I dont need to worry about these options for my business protocol
Custom Document Over Internet"
Am I right ?
Please confirm...

Functional Acknowledgement Version

Two questions about B2B automatic functional acknowledgements:
1. What version of CONTRL does B2B produce if FA Handled Automatically is set to Yes in 11.1.1.6 in an EDIFACT exchange?
2. Can the content of the CONTRL message to be produced be configured?
Thanks

1. What version of CONTRL does B2B produce if FA Handled Automatically is set to Yes in 11.1.1.6 in an EDIFACT exchange? CONTRL version D3 is used for single transaction and version 4.1 is used for batches.
2. Can the content of the CONTRL message to be produced be configured?No. You may indicate B2B to generate envelope parameters for CONTRL as per incoming request but you cannot modify the data. To have customized CONTRL, disable the FA Handled By B2B option in the agreement and preapare & send the FA from back-end.
Regards,
Anuj

Multiple Function Acknowledgments (997) to email

Hi,
I have the following problem. We send invoices to an external system and it sends back funtional acknowledgment (ANSI 997). We convert this file with the Seeburger Adapter to an XI-XML and then send it through email to different recepients. Everything is working fine but now, we have the following issue. Sometimes, there come in two or more acknowledgments in one file:
ISA00 00 ZZ1234 121234123456 0701231445U004010000000220P<~
GSFAULULUL12341234562007012314451821X004010~
ST9970001~
AK1IN1~
AK2810010127263~
AK5*A~
AK9A111~
SE60001~
GE121~
IEA1000000022~
ISA00 00 ZZ1234 121234123456 0701231445U004010000000210P<~
GSFAULULUL12341234562007012314451620X004010~
ST9970001~
AK1IN1~
AK2810010127262~
AK5*A~
AK9A111~
SE60001~
GE120~
IEA1000000021~
We receive an error message by XI that the file is not XML because only one header line is allowed. How can we split this file into 1...n messages? I tried to do a multiple mapping but there is still an error. Any ideas?
Regards,
Stefan

Stefan,
As your source file has multiple XMlL's created by the SeeBurger Adapter,
1. Check if the splitting can be done at the adapter level itself?
2. If no, and you want XI to handle this, then you will need to use Java Mapping to handle this. Convert your InputStream into a string and then use a substring funtion to split the Input String into the valid XML's and process the same as needed.
Regards
Bhavesh

Rejecting functional acknowledgement before reaching PI. (incoming EDI)

Hi Friends,
Scenario is EDI (X12 format)<-> PI <-> IDOC (Shipment notification)
Requirement is we need to send reject acks (997) if the sending X12 doesn't have item details.
This has to be accomplished at Seeburger level and should not reach PI. (bcause if it reaches PI then sender (EDI) assumes that we already picked up the file using the splitter adapter)
Any inputs is grtly appreciated.
Regards,
Pavan

Solved,
We are making changes in the BIC mappings in Seeburger.

Functional Acknowledgement in BPEL

Hi,
I have a source BPEL , BPEL A which will insert the record into a target table and should sleep. There is BPEL B which will poll the target table and process the record which BPEL A has put. As soon as the BPEL B is finishes processing the record BPEL A shold resume and complete the process ( To ensure that the record has been processed successfully ). Is there any way that BPEL B acknowledge BPEL A that the record has been processed? ( In real conditions BPEL A can put record into a table and the record passes multiple tables and finally reaches the target table, can BPEL A wait till that record successfully reach the target.)
Thanks,
Ramesh

Yes you can. Process A should have a Receive activity on the client partnerlink with a differernt operation . It wil wait on this activity for a message. Process B should Invoke Process A on this operation and send the message.
You should use your own correlation-set to pass the correct message from B to the A. The correlation should on be defined on process A.
http://orasoa.blogspot.com/2006/07/bpel-correlation-this-usefull-article.html
Marc

Functional Acknowledgement varying version

Hi Gururs,
We are using OAG BODs for B2B Communications.
The document version is 9.0; and we are allowing B2B to collaborate the message acks.
Is it possible to use the Confirm BOD (Ack) to be of version 7.2 despite the documents (e.g. PO, POCO) being 9.0; and not requiring us to go to the middleware layer, but allow b2b to correlate?
Regards,
Sambhav

Hi Sambhav,
You may send CBOD of different version but from middleware and instead of FA, it should be treated like a response message at B2B layer. You can have content based correlation at B2B layer as well.
Regards,
Anuj

Functional acknowledgment 997 reconcilation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for