Functional Area assigned to Cost Elements

Hi All,
Where can i see the list of cost elements assigned to different functional areas.
Thanks in advance.

Use tr. KA23 for collective processing of cost elements.
You can use the radio button to display all cost elements, or you want to filter the cost element list for only certain functional areas you can use the option for a Selection Variant.  Just click on the Create icon and input your functional area(s) and save the variant and give it a name and description.  Then return to the KA23 screen and use F4 help or input the variant you saved. 
After you execute the report and the list is returned, you may not see functional area immediately by default.  Simply use the icon to change the layout and send the functional area field from the column set on the right to the displayed columns on the left.
If you have access to tr. SE16 or SE17 you can also simply look at the table contents of table CSKA to see the assignments of functional area to cost elements.
Best regards,
Jeffrey Holdeman

Similar Messages

  • Update Functional Area on Secondary Cost Element

    Hi gurus,
    I'm trying to update Functional Area on Secondary Cost Element. I've created a LSMW to make it but when I run the bacthinput the system give me a message in order to inform me that this changes might need a lot of time because there are several internal changes to do.
    The problem is that no functional area is updating, and I'm trying with just an item and the system needs a lot of time to update just one Funcional Area, more than a hour!
    So, I don't know if some of you already had the same problem or is a problem with performance of system, because in Develop System I didn't have any issue to update this information.
    Is there any form to update this information than LSMS or Individual transaction?
    Kr
    Jorge

    Hi Jorge
    I was trying to change it manually in KA02 and there are tasks the systems does before confirming.
    This is the root cause.
    "Field changes to field Functional Area lead to
    complicated tests of the data involved, which
    may take some time. Do you really want to change
    the field online? "
    There is an option to change it in background.
    Regards

  • There are values for cost element 80000 that are not assigned to any line I

    Hi,
    While calulating WIP I am getting below error:
    There are values for cost element 80000 that are not assigned to any line ID
    Message no. KJ161
    Diagnosis
    Not all values for the cost element are assigned to a line ID.
    Procedure
    Assign the cost element to a line ID. If you don't want to include the cost element in results analysis, assign it to a line ID of category N.
    You can access a detailed list of unassigned cost elements as follows: Start results analysis in the individual processing mode (transaction KKA1, KKA2, or KKA3). Select the field Full log. Execute the function. On the next screen, choose Logs -> Parameter List in the menu. A list is generated. The unassigned values are shown at the end of the list.
    If cost element "+++++++++" was shown in the message, this is because in the assignment of costs and revenues to line IDs, you have not used a cost element other than the full masking "+++++++++". In this case a presummarization eliminates the information on the cost element.
    Cost Element 80000 is of type 43 Internal activity allocation, I have Masked this in OKGB as below:
    Controlling Area = FLGP
    RA Version = 0
    Masked Cost Element = 000008++++
    Masked Cost Center = ++++++++++
    Masked Activity Type = +++++
    ReqToCap= COS (Secondary Cost)
    I have Configure OKGA also but still system is giving error.
    Please help me to understand.
    Regards,
    Vivek

    I was wondering if you could help me I am trying to configure the RA key for Refurb orders and when I go into txn OKGB for the Assignment of C/E for WIP there is sample config already there which I copied.  But I am having difficulty getting the KK1A to work I am getting the message as outlined above.  Could you explain how this OKGB works and how to configure it a bit more fully.  In my sample config there is a ReqTOCap section and in it there are letters like ABR, EK, FK, EL what do they mean.  This is a screen shot of it.  I am not sure how to go about this entirely so any light you could shed would be greatly appreciated.  Can you suggest a good resource or documentation you may have, would be greatly appreciated.

  • BEx:Hierarchies in DIM and FAC are different for Cost Element

    Hi Experts,
    Whenever we execute a report we are getting a warning message as "Hierarchies in DIM and FAC are different for Cost Element", but in report level we are not maintaining hierarchy properties for Cost Element.
    We have executed Master Data tests in RSRV also and still the problem.
    Is any other to do to get rid of this warning message?
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    RAO.

    Hi all,
    I face the issue like this but with transaction KOAP - Plan settlement
    But, the problem is that, I do not active reconciliation ledger, so I do not maintain any thing relate to reconciation ledger or adjustment posting? I can do transaction "actual settlement"  without error
    So, How this error come to me?
    And how I can fix it?
    Thanks all!

  • Change Functional Area of a cost center

    Hi,
    Initially I booked an entry in cost center A, which has functional area (FA), say FA1.
    After that, I would like to change the FA in cost center A through KS02.  But failed, with error message:
    Transaction data exists; note long text.
    Procedure
    If a change to the functional area is absolutely necessary, this can be completed by following the instructions of SAPnet database note 115840.
    OK fine.  This make sense that I need to reverse my posting.  After I made the reversal entry and checked the KSB1 is 0 for cost center A.
    Then, I try to change FA again for cost center A, using KS02.
    Issue: same error message.
    Any idea? Help needed.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello,
    I just reproduced that on your test system.
    Cancelling the postings to a value of 0,00 on a cost center is not enough to be able to change the functional area in a cost center.
    You have to delete the transaction data from the cost center. You can use report ZKACOR21 to do that. Please see SAP note 175522 regarding that report.
    Best regards,
    Andreas

  • Function Area derive from cost center

    Hi, here is a question.
    The function area was input in the cost center master data. Cost center A ( Function area 1000), Cost center B (Function area 2000)
    Then creat a PO with Account Assignment Category(K), Item Category (B), input the cost center A in the PO.
    When I do MIRO, I change the cost center (A TO B), but the function is still 1000, not change to 2000. But if I delete the Function area in MIRO first, then change the cost center, the function area update to 2000.
    There is no default function area in GL account and cost element, also no substitution.
    Is it standard in SAP?  I want the Function area can be updated with the cost center. Any method?

    Here is what SAP help says about this.
    Functional area field for postings - ready for input?
    You can enter the functional area directly when entering G/L account postings, provided the "Functional area" field is shown in the field status group of the G/L account.
    SAP recommends that you do not show the "Functional area" field in the field status group of the G/L account, but rather that you have the system determine the functional area of the account assignment. This eliminates the risk of the user entering incorrect functional areas.
    You said you have functional area in cost center master data.  When you post documents, do you get func. area from the cost center automatically or not?

  • Down payment problems Customer/Vendor - Assign default cost elements

    Helo Gurus,
    ive tried to execute TC: F-29 Customer and F-48 Vendor down payments.
    I enter all the data needed and additionaly Internal Order.
    Then i get a message saying:
    Maintain default revenue element in controlling area 5000
    Message no. FI661
    Diagnosis
    CO down payment update is active in controlling area 5000.  You must therefore maintain a default cost element and a default revenue element for down payments.
    Procedure
    Maintain the default cost elements for down payments for controlling area 5000 in the Project System implementation guide.
    The maintenance is done in TC: OKEP (project system)
    I created two revenue Cost elements and tried to assign them there, but it says CE are nore primary CE.
    I changed it from revenue to primary, then it says that CE isnt revenue...
    weird stuff
    What could be the problem?
    Regards
    Laurynas

    Hi,
    Please refer to SAP Note 388843.
    Regards,
    Srinu

  • Default account assignment in cost element creation

    hi,
    in the cost element creation transaction (KA01) I need the default account assignment to be the WBS element. but in the transaction only cost center and order is showing as dafault account assignment, how can I include the WBS as cost object?
    Thanks
    Edited by: gayani premawardena on Sep 3, 2010 12:24 PM

    Hi
    If you are aware of FI substitution or validation, it works the same way
    1. Go to OKC9 and click on New entries
    2. Enter your contr area and choose Event = Line Item and Save.. It would ask for a transport request
    3. Now click on the magnifying lens icon, then drill down on cost accounting > Line Item. Now click on Create Substitution icon and give it a name
    4. Now click on Create Step and write your substitution by choosing fields from the COBL structure
    It should like like, Prerequisites: IF COBL - BUKRS = XXXX and Cost Ele = YYYY,
    Action to be taken if Pre-req is met - Substitute WBS = ZZZZ
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Changing assignment of cost elements to cost components

    Hello,
    I want to assign a cost component to another cost element. Message no. KQ312 Maintenance after deactivating 10 makes cost estimates incomparable appears.
    After the change, isn't it possible to compare the cost estimate anymore at all or just the changed cost components?
    Regards, Jan

    If you change the cost element grouping in your cost component - the standars SAP gives the message that previous cost estimate cost component will not be comparable.. It has got logic because once you do the Actvity price calculation system stores the value as per cost component strcuture in KEPH table . The 40 cost feils in KEPH get dynamically linked as per your cost component.
    So if you want to change it  , you can change it but makesure you run the KSPI again . If you are moving your existing cost element to another group , the previous saves cost component will not display correctly , although all the future cost estimate will show you as per revised strcuture.
    If you not bother about previous cost compoent display then you can change it.
    Regards
    Ranjan

  • PSG- Assign Setlement Cost Element

    We have service and sales order that have settlement rule PSG.  At settlement an  FI posting is made, which are defined in OKG8.
    PA uses the Cost elements (890963) assigned in OKG4 as the source. The PA transfer structure is complete - assigning values to Value Fields (VVC10)
    When this settlement is complete - a Secondary Cost element is assigned to the settlement transaction (870200) and I see it in the Cost Analysis of the Orders
    Where is this  secondary cost element (870200) assigned?
    thanks in advance for help
    Althea

    Found the answer - Allocation Structure which is under Cost object controlling > Period End > Settlement

  • Organisational keys are assigned based cost centre associated with Bus Area

    Hi ,
    I need to add the authorization check in the Z* program Within TE, restrictions are being implemented based upon organisational key.  Organisational keys are assigned based upon whether or not the cost centre has an associated business area.  If a business area exists, then a restricted organisational key (in range US01* to US50*) is assigned.  Otherwise, a non-restricted organisational key is used. 
    Can any one help me !
    Thanks,
    Nelson

    The authorization check for trip statistics reporting has a maximum of three stages:
    Before displaying the selection screen
    Before the selection screen is displayed a check is made as to whether the user has the authorization to view just his own trip data, or also the trip data of other employees.
    The following check is made:
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'P_TRAVL'
    ID 'AUTHP' FIELD 'E'
    ID 'BUKRS' DUMMY
    ID 'PERSA' DUMMY
    ID 'KOSTL' DUMMY
    ID 'PERSG' DUMMY
    ID 'PERSK' DUMMY
    ID 'VDSK1' DUMMY
    ID 'PTZUO' DUMMY
    ID 'AUTHF' DUMMY
    ID 'AUTHS' DUMMY.
    If the employee only has authorization to view his own data, the personnel number is determined using the Infotype Communication (0105). This personnel number is then displayed in the selection screen of the relevant report and can not be overwritten.
    If the Infotype 0105 has not been maintained the program ends abnormally and an appropriate error message is issued. No further checks are made as the employee can only display his own data.
    If the employee has the authorization to display the data of other employees as well, further authorization checks are made during the processing of the personnel and trip data.
    During processing of personnel data
    The following check is made for every personnel number read from the database:
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'P_TRAVL'
    ID 'AUTHP' DUMMY
    ID 'BUKRS' FIELD pa0001-bukrs
    ID 'PERSA' FIELD pa0001-werks
    ID 'KOSTL' FIELD pa0001-kostl
    ID 'PERSG' FIELD pa0001-persg
    ID 'PERSK' FIELD pa0001-persk
    ID 'VDSK1' DUMMY
    ID 'PTZUO' DUMMY
    ID 'AUTHF' DUMMY
    ID 'AUTHS' DUMMY.
    If the check is successful, the trip data for the personnel number is processed, if unsuccessful, the personnel number is ignored.
    During processing of trip data
    The following check is made for each selected trip:
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'P_TRAVL'
    ID 'AUTHP' DUMMY
    ID 'BUKRS' FIELD pa0001-bukrs
    ID 'PERSA' FIELD pa0001-werks
    ID 'KOSTL' FIELD pa0001-kostl
    ID 'PERSG' FIELD pa0001-persg
    ID 'PERSK' FIELD pa0001-persk
    ID 'VDSK1' DUMMY
    ID 'PTZUO' DUMMY
    ID 'AUTHF' FIELD authf
    ID 'AUTHS' DUMMY.
    The AUTHF field has 3 positions:
    Position 1: S - Statistics data for reporting
    Position 2: - Request status of trip
    Position 3: - Settlement status of trip
    If the check is successful, the selected trip is displayed in the report list, if unsuccessful, the trip is ignored.

  • Function module to find cost elements in a cost element group?

    Can any one please help me find all the cost elements in a cost element group?
    Regards,
    ABAPer

    hi,
    Look at table SETHEADER. For Cost Center Groups, use SETCLASS = '0101'; for Order Groups, use SETCLASS = '0103'.
    <b>cost center
    BAPI_COSTCENTERGROUP_GETDETAIL
    the return structure HIERARCHYVALUES will hold all children cost centers.
    cost elements.
    BAPI_COSTELEMENTGRP_GETDETAIL</b>
    rgds
    anver
    Message was edited by: Anversha s

  • Business Area assignment to cost center

    First time we have assigned Business areas to Cost Centers on 31.03.2009 effective from 01.04.2009. But since some of the cost centers(28 nos out of 300) have Transaction data (error message KS134) we could not assign Business Areas.
    Hence we have decided to create New cost centers in place of these 28.
    And now we are testing this scenario in test server. Since we will have to replace the existing cost center assignments with Work center(PP/PM), Asset(FI/IM), Positions(HR), we have started with Asset transaction AS02.
    SAP is not allowing to change the existing Cost Center assignment to Asset & it is disabled. But since we are going for New cost centers the Assignment of old cost centers to Assets can not be continued.
    Hence pls. provide the solution on how to change of Cost Center assignment to Asset effective 01.05.2009 ? Also is this right approach to create New cost centers for the error message KS134 ?
    With Regrds,
    Shrirang

    hi
    check the settings in asset accounting for the additinal account assignment.

  • Cost Center validity period change & Business area assignment to cost cente

    We are facing with error KS134 - Transaction data already exists for the period.
    We tried to create new cost center with period split. But I am getting error KS133 - Deletion is not possible (dependent records exist in table ).
    Hence even creation of the new cost center is not possible. We alrady have Validity Period from 1.04.2005 to 31.12.9999.
    Is there any alternative solution ?
    Sumeet

    Hi Sumeet,
    The fields in Cost Center Master Data are "Time-Dependent" and you can see the Time-Dependency of each field in OKEG transaction code where you can find "Business Area" to be "Fiscal-Year" based.
    So, if at all you need to change the Business Area, it would be possible in next financial year only...
    And also, because, your Cost Center is defined from 01.04.2005 to 31.12.999, there is no way that you can change the validity period so as to create / extend in the same period-lap.
    I hope you got it...
    Srikanth Munnaluri
    Edited by: Srikanth Munnaluri on Apr 8, 2009 3:11 PM

  • Problem of Functional Area in Allocation

    Dear All
    We want to allocate some ADMIN Cost Centres which have "x" Functional Area with Secondary Cost Element (SCE) which *does not*  have any Functional Area to BRAND Cost Centre which doesnot have any Functional Area using a Secondary Cost Element (SCE) which has "Y" Functional Area.
      The Cycle is Dr & Cr the correct cost Centre,and forcing both Functional Are,so in the P&L report in the collector cost centers we see a debit still sitting in FA X (because it didnu2019t clear) and a credit in FA Y (because it was forced).
    We tried everything within the cycle to make this work correctly; derive functional area checked and unchecked, each with forcing correct sender and receiver functional areas within the cycle and even removing the functional area from the SCE "Y" with various options above,but still the problem persists,Can any one Guide how to do ,is there any Note available
    Thanks

    HI,
    check SAPNET note 764485, especially point 2 and 3:
    "2. Set the functional area derivation of characteristics so that the functional area is already derived on the entry screen, and not when you are posting as is the case in earlier releases. For more information, see Note 740519.
    To capitalize the functional area derivation on the entry screen, proceed as follows: Financial Accounting (New) -> Financial Accounting Basic Settings (New) -> Tools -> Customer Enhancements -> Enhance Determination of Functional Area.
    3. To set the update of the functional area in the CO totals tables, proceed as follows: Controlling -> General Controlling -> Include Characteristics in CO Totals Records. You can activate the update of the characteristics can independently."
    Best regards, Christian

Maybe you are looking for