Functionality Differences between Calendar Express & Communications Express

Now that the BIG problems related to our migration from Calendar v5.1.1 to v6.3 have died down, we're getting reports of significant (to our users, at least) differences in the functionality between our old environment (Calendar Express v5.1.1) and the new environment (Communications Express v6.3) (partial list at the end of this posting).
All of the below issues, I have checked in Calendar Express v6.3, and they appear to function as our users expect, like they did in 5.1.1. The problem is that we went live with CommExpress, and have not branded Calendar Express for general consumption. We would like to be able to make the CommExpr calendar functions work like they do in Calendar Express, assuming it wouldn't be a HUGE undertaking of modification to the underlying code. I've asked Sun Support for some answers regarding this, but thought I'd post something here while I wait for an answer.
Issues:
- When scheduling an appointment on someone else's calendar (subscribed), the owner of the calendar is NOT added as an invitee, but the logged-in user is. This causes major problems when trying to check availability, because the owner of the calendar is not included in this check, but the person doing the scheduling is, even though they're not going to the meeting.
- When you click on "check availability" from the main CommExpress calendar screen, it defaults to the logged-in user, and not the user for the currently selected "Current Calendar." Again, user reports that this functionality is different than previously.
- Also, previously when two events were scheduled for a user at the same time, the calendar would show "conflict" in red letters in both events. We are no longer getting this warning.
Again, all three of these issues behave in the current version of Calendar Express like they did in v5.1.1. CommExpress just doesn't work right in this respect. We'd like to continue to use CommExpress, since all indications are that Calendar Express is going away at some point, but we need the calendar functionality that CommExpress is not providing.
Thanks,
Kurt

shane_hjorth wrote:
I only tested with the month-view so it is entirely possible that I missed the week-view. Mea culpa.
If you could please provide the diffs of the changes you made that would be useful for any other forum reader thinking of making a similar modification.
These changes may be more than absolutely required for the change, but they seem to be working as expected.
#> pwd
/var/opt/SUNWuwc/uwc/css
#> diff css_ie5win.css css_ie5win.css.2008-09-05 626,628c626
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;*/
< border-right: 4px solid #FF0000;
border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;633,635c631
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px dotted #B67A27;*/
< border-right: 4px dotted #FF0000;
border-right: 4px dotted #B67A27;645,647c641
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;*/
< border-right: 4px solid #FF0000;
border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;653,655c647
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px dotted #C0C5ED;*/
< border-right: 4px dotted #FF0000;
border-right: 4px dotted #C0C5ED;674,676c666
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;*/
< border-right: 4px solid #FF0000;
border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;704,706c694
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;*/
< border-right: 4px solid #FF0000;
border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;714,716c702
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;*/
< border-right: 4px solid #FF0000;
border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;722,724c708
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;*/
< border-right: 4px solid #FF0000;
border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;#> diff css_ns6up.css css_ns6up.css.2008-09-05 626,628c626
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;*/
< border-right: 4px solid #FF0000;
border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;638,640c636
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;*/
< border-right: 4px solid #FF0000;
border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;646,648c642
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px dotted #C0C5ED;*/
< border-right: 4px dotted #FF0000;
border-right: 4px dotted #C0C5ED;667,669c661
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;*/
< border-right: 4px solid #FF0000;
border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;681,683c673
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;*/
< border-right: 4px solid #FF0000;
border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;705,707c695
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;*/
< border-right: 4px solid #FF0000;
border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;715,717c703
< /* WSU mod */
< /* border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;*/
< border-right: 4px solid #FF0000;
border-right: 4px solid #B67A27;

Similar Messages

  • Difference between Logic Express 8 and Logic Pro 9

    I am wondering if there is a big difference in these 2 versions.  I mostly do vocals, where I bring in a karaoke track, and then sing multiple tracks to it, so I'm wondering if it pays to step up to Logic Pro 9. 

    Hi
    Many of the new features in Logic Pro 9 are discussed on Apple's product pages http://www.apple.com/logicpro/
    The fundamental differences between the Express and Pro versions are discussed here:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4229
    CCT

  • Differences between AirPort Express and Extreme?

    What are they differences between AirPort Express and Extreme?

    You can find all the differences between the AirPort Express and Extreme in this website > http://www.apple.com/compare-wifi-models/

  • What are the main differences between airport express and extreme?

    what are the main differences between the express and extreme base stations.

    In addition to Bob Timmons' link the main differences are as follows:
    Extreme has a slightly more powerful antenna (might not be true but from experience it seems to be)
    Extreme has USB HDD sharing
    Express has AirPlay
    Extreme has 3 Gigabit ports (don't be confused by Apple's page. Apple states 4 including WAN, 3 without WAN)
    Express is smaller
    Express has 10/100 Ethernet whereas Extreme has Gigabit

  • What are the main differences between Signal Express and Labview?

    National Instruments provides a matrix so one can quickly compare the
    various versions of Labview but no comparison of Signal Express with
    Labview. Hence how does Signal Express compare with Labview? What
    are some of the things one can do with Labview one can't do with
    Signal Express?
    Howard

    hrh1818 wrote: Which version of Labview are you referring to? I don't consider the graphical version of Labview to be a full featured programming language. LabWindows/CVI is by a long shot a lot closer to being a full featured programming language than the graphical version of Labview.
    Howard,
    You clearly don't know what you are talking about. There is no "graphical version" of LabVIEW, there is just LabVIEW. Click on the article "Is LabVIEW a general purpose programming language?" written by the Jeff K. for some easy reading from a few years ago. It is all still true (except that object oriented features and recursion have been added in recent versions).
    One of the main points at this years NI-week was the discussion of how processor development is switching more and more to multicore designs  to improve performance because a simple boost in clock frequency is becoming more difficult. Linear, text based code is not well suited to take advantage of multticore design, while the dataflow based LabVIEW programming language automatically scales well to multiple processor cores, without any need to rewrite older code. I would say that only LabVIEW is futureproof in this respect. LabVIEW programmers are not wimps that are simply too stupid to write text based code. LabVIEW is not a toy language for people that don't want to learn a "real" programming language.
    LabVIEW is arguably the best programming language in terms of getting things done! I've never felt limited with LabVIEW and my programs often don't even have anything to do with data acquisition or instrument control. The difference between text based code vs. LabVIEW is like "DOS vs. Windows", "Radio vs. HD television". "Trilobyte vs. Homo sapiens" (sorry Putnam ). Text based code is monochrome, archaic and outdated and its linearity imposes unecessary constraints on the programmer that can only be (partially) overcome by wasting even more time throwing even more code at it.
    Sure, a seasoned text based programmer will initially have problems adapting to LabVIEW, just because you would need to adapt to and embrace the power of dataflow and not try to make a literal translation of the text code to LabVIEW, retaining old habits. If you get stuck, come back and ask here in the forum.
    You were looking for object oriented features and failed. All you need to do is a quick site search. All the information is out there. Just because you cannot find it in the first five sentences of the glossy brochure does not mean it does not exist. Maybe you want to read one of the application notes such as:
    LabVIEW Object-Oriented Programming: The Decisions Behind the Design
    In general, you should avoid judgement until you have all information. Your opinions seem quite biased and superficial and not really based on hard facts.
    Initially you asked about the difference between signal express and LabVIEW.
    hrh1818 wrote:
    > What kind of measurments do you want to do and what kind of requirements do you have?
    > You can also see for yourself and download evaluation version of both.
    No thanks, there has to be a better way to get an answer to my
    question than get involved in a two month study project.
    If you would answer the first question quoted above, we could certainly help you with the decision. Isn't that the main purpose of this thread?
    You can also contact your local LabVIEW Field Engineer to go over your requirements and help you make a decision. They usually know their stuff!
    Message Edited by altenbach on 09-02-2007 11:51 PM
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • Difference Between Application Express and XE

    Hello
    I am new and would like to know what is the difference between Application Express(Apex) and XE?
    Is XE a standalone version and Apex is more like an enterprise editiion?
    Thanks

    read on http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/application_express/html/apex_and_xe.html
    Oracle Database 10g Express Edition (Oracle Database XE) includes Oracle Application Express (Oracle APEX) release 2.1, a declarative, graphical development environment for creating database-centric Web applications. Oracle APEX is installed in Oracle Database XE as the primary tool for managing the database and building Web-based applications. The majority of the administration tasks of Oracle Database 10g Express Edition can be performed using the administrative features of Oracle APEX, such as monitor database activity and manage database users, storage, memory and database objects. The simple Web-based interface enables users with minimum Oracle experience to easily manage the database. Application Express is pre-installed and fully configured, and it is immediately available after installation of Oracle Database 10g Express Edition.
    Is XE a standalone version and Apex is more like an enterprise editiion?XE is oracle database (free) it for test or using on limit (to 4GB of user data, use up to 1GB of memory, and use one CPU on the host machine)
    APEX is application (Web) can integrate on Oracle Database Enterprise, Standard and .... RAC
    Edited by: Surachart (HunterX) on Jun 15, 2009 6:03 PM

  • Differences between Calendar and Reminders

    Hi, anybody can give help and let me know the differences between Calendar and Reminders? I found the Calendar got all functions of the Reminders. If I want to mark an appointment, which one I should choose? Calendar or Reminders?

    I look at this way. The Reminders app is sort of a To-Do list for simple tasks. It's like writing yourself a note electronically ... Pick up milk on the way home, let the cat out, don't forget to stop at the post office.., things like that.
    The calendar app is a more robust app that allows you to share your meetings and appointments with others - if you need to or want to do so, it has the ability to repeat recurring events ( with some limitations), it has the option for multiple alerts (2) and more customization than the reminders app. You can select from and use a number of different calendars in the calendars app as well.
    if it were me, I would use the calendars app for appointments,

  • Whats the functional difference between CUA and UME?

    Hi All,
    A small query regarding UME (User Management Engine) and CUA ( Central User Administration). Whats the functional difference between these two. I read in help documents that UME will be used for SAP WebAS Java server. But I read that it can be used for ABAP engine as well. Then why do we need to use CUA when we have user friendly interface tool like UME. According to my knowledge from help documentation, UME comes pre installed. so we dont need to install it as we have to do for CUA.
    Can any help me in understanding the difference between these two. Thanks in advance. Good day.
    Regards,
    Farooq.

    Hi,
    Indeed good question.
    It depends on installation type you selected. But are responsible for user administration in terms of creating, deleting, updating and role assignment tasks to users and groups.
    --CUA is meant for ABAP Installation. CUA is responsible for entire landscape user administration works with RFC connection talking to all ABAP systems
    --UME is meant for Java installations, plus UME is responsible for handling communication between ABAP users and java users.
    UME
    For more details see below links all advantages and disadvantages of both systems and comparisons deliberately.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/d2/3e3842b23d690de10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    Thanks,
    Amit Lal
    P.S Please don't forget to reward pts.

  • Functional difference between Blackberry and Internet Browser on the device

    Hello:
    Based on the following link, I understand the difference between the Blackberry and Internet browser (http://www.blackberryforums.com.au/forums/blackber​ry-general-discussion/2815-difference-between-brow​...
    I was wondering if there are any functional difference between the two, i.e. HTML rendering, images being broken, etc. Under Browser -> Options -> Browser Configuration, If I configure both the Blackberry and Internet browser the same way, will a particular URL behave the same?
    I'm in the process of testing our mobile applications on different devices and would appreciate if you could provide the difference, if any between the 2 browsers.
    Thanks:
    Vishal

    Hey vishalt77,
    Welcome to the BlackBerry Support Community Forums.
    All BlackBerry smartphones will have Internet Browser for browsing the web.
    However if you're on a BlackBerry Enterprise Server, you get the BlackBerry Browser which enables you to access internal websites and secured websites.
    -ViciousFerret
    Come follow your BlackBerry Technical Team on Twitter! @BlackBerryHelp
    Be sure to click Like! for those who have helped you.
    Click  Accept as Solution for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

  • What are the functional differences between the iPhone and the iPod Touch, barring of course the differences in service requirements.

    What are the functional differences between the iPhone and the iPod Touch, barring of course the differences in service requirements.

    For one, their form factors are slightly different as the iPhone has a bit more squarish body whereas the iPod Touch has a tapered back to it. 
    The iPhone also has much better front and rear cameras. Exact details as to the difference in megapixels depends on whether or not you talking about the iPhone 4 or 4S.  If you would like to get more details, you can always view
    each models specs on Apple's online store.
    See here for a better explanation.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPod_Touch#Comparison_to_the_iPhone
    I'm sure others will chime in with other things as well.
    B-rock

  • Key functional differences between SRM 7 and SRM 5

    Dear All,
    I urgently need to put togther a comparison document thst list key functional differences between SRM 7 and SRM 5.
    NB. i donot have access to service marketplace.
    sheena.roberts(AT)yahoo
    Thanks
    Edited by: Sheena Roberts on Jan 18, 2011 11:21 AM

    Hi Sheena,
                        Go to  difference between srm 5.0 and 7.0
    Regards
    Vishal Pd

  • Interface/Functional Differences between EPM Planning 11.1.1.3 & 11.1.2.2.

    We are considering a migration from Hyperion Planning 11.1.1.3 to 11.1.2.2 and have found lots of documentation describing the technical exercise but little on the functional differences between the two products that would be of more interest to our users.
    Q1. Will 11.1.2.2 appear to our users as fundamentally a different product requiring retraining, changes to business procedures etc?
    Q2. Is there any documentation out there that compares the functionality and 'look' of the two releases that I have missed and that would help?
    Thanks.

    You could have a look at the cumulative feature tool which highlights functionality additions between versions by product - https://support.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=NOT&id=1092114.1
    It is probably worth setting up a quick 11.1.2.3 POC planning instance to have a look at the new version of planning to see whether you feel that additional training will be required - http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17236_01/epm.1112/epm_planning_rapid_deploy_1112200.pdf, the main change is the look and feel with the ADF functionality the concept of planning has not changed, the ADF functionality can be switched off if you want to revert back to the old style.
    Cheers
    John
    http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Functionality differences between Principal Toolbox & Ms Projects 2010

    Hi there,
    I'm looking for some advise about the functionality differences between Principle Toolbox (planning module) & MS Projects 2010.
    Currently I'm working at an IT company where my project managers use MS Projects 2010 to plan their activities for their projects. 
    My management wants to know what the differences in functionality are between the two programs. I'm not looking for answers like "different GUI", but (for example) I would like to know what functionalities can you use with MS Projects and can not
    use with the Pincipal toolbox. 
    I hope someone, who has experience with both programs, can give me some good advise.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    I've never worked with Principle Toolbox but here are 2 interesting comparisons which you might already know:
    http://project-management-software.findthebest-sw.com/compare/3-21/Microsoft-Project-vs-Principal-Toolbox
    http://www.itqlick.com/index.php?module=Products&pname=internalcompare&prod1=112&prod2=2395
    I think the main concern should be that Principle toolbox doesn't offer a cloud solution.
    Hope this helps,
    Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, P-Seller |

  • What is the conceptual and functional difference between peripheral target and Enterprise peripheral target?

                       Dear All,
    what is the conceptual and functional difference between peripheral target and Enterprise peripheral target?

    Does anyone get a chance to see this ?

  • LE/WM functionality difference between 4.6c and ECC 6.0

    Hi,
         I am looking for functionality differences between 4.6c and ECC 6.0 for LE and WM in particular. I have already checked the sites related to overall differences. I am particularly looking for differences between 4.6c and ECC 6.0 in Warehouse Management and Logistics Execution. Helpful answers will be rewarded.
    cheers,
    Sarvesh

    This is what I have gathered from this thread.
    R 4.7 New Functionality in WM:
    •     Cross Docking
    •     Value Added Services
    •     Task and Resource Management
    •     Dynamic Cycle Counting
    •     Yard Management
    Effect of ECC 5.0 on WM:
    Archiving Data has been improved
    ECC 6.0 Version comparison link
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    •     Picking Consolidation for many deliveries
    •     RFID integration
    •     Enhanced Cross Docking
    •     Enhanced Task and Resource Management

Maybe you are looking for