Fund Center derivation based on PM order

Hi all,
Our requirement is that Fund Center should be derived from the cost center field (location tab) in the PM order. I am using function module FMDT_READ_MD_ORDER to achieve the result. I am getting the result but it is disturbing my process orders creation as there is no cost center field in process order master
I want to make a condition based on PM order type. what is the best option. Can i use the following
First derivation rule . update Order Type to USERTEMP1
Second derivation rule: call FMDT_READ_MD_ORDER and put a condition to check USERTEMP1 is PM order types
Please advise. Will it affect any other area
Lincy

Hi,
Yes, the way you described would be most common practice to deal with this requirement. You read the relevant data through built-in function module (or user-exit) and put the value in temporarily field. Then, in the next rule you base FM derivation on that field.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

  • Fund center derivation based on functional location cost center

    Hi,
    can anybody share the process to derive fund center based on cost center assigned to functional location/equipment of a plant maintenance order
    Thanks

    Hi Eli,
    Thanks for your response.
    Scenario is as follows:
    Cost is booked to PM order & settles to cost centers. I don't have budget at PM order level. But will have budget in fund management for cost center. So whenever I book cost to PM order it should check budget available in fund center. Fund center should be derived from cost center assigned to functional location of PM Order
    I have not used function module before for derivation. I have created a derivation rule based on functional module but there is no place to assign fund center in derivation rule. Please explain the process to derived fund center through PM order in above scenario.
    Thanks

  • No fund center derive

    Dear sapient
    I am getting an error while doing PR. "no fund center derive". I created one derivation rule
    MATERIAL NUMBER=COMMITMENT ITEM-FUND CENTER
    User is entering 4 line item with different material code, but in line item 3 system is deriving correct fund center and commitment item. in other line system is deriving only commitment item not the fund center.
    systme showing error NO FUND CENTER DERIVE FOR LINE ITEM 10,20,40.
    Please suggest me.
    thnx and regards
    Soraj

    HI Eli
    Thanx for reply. I activated the trace but only commitment item is deriving .
    Sory to say that user have given wrong inform that in one line item FUND CENTER & COMMITMENT ITEM is flowing.
    but actuly fund center is not coming in all 10,20,30,40 line items.
    Please let me know the reason. if i did any mistake. or shall i create two different rule like
    MATERIAL NUMBER= COMMITMENT ITEM
    MATERIAL NUMBER=FUND CENTER
    Thanx and regards
    Soraj

  • No Funds Center error while creating Production Order in CO01

    Hi SAP Consultants,
    I am trying to save production order in transaction CO01 but I am getting error saying "No funds center entered/derived in item 00001"
    Diagnosis
    In company code (&2) the component Funds Management is active. This requires the entries or the derivation of a funds center.
    You can use the following elements to derive the funds center: company code / account  or CO object .
    Procedure
    Enter a funds center or ensure that the funds center can be derived from the possible assignments by:
    assigning a funds center in the commitment items- master record or maintaining the assigning of a funds center to the CO object.
    My company is a public sector company and Funds management is active.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    Kindly check for item 0001 in the Material Master which Profit Center is maintained and check if a Funds center is assigned to it. This should solve your problem.

  • Funds Mangement - Fund center derivation error at the time of PO/MIGO

    Hello -
    Generally ,If FM account assignements are available in purchase requisition , same should be carried to purchase order and to the good receipts. But I am getting an error at the time of PO or MIGO that " Fund center not derived'. Why this happening ? What can I do to avoid this problem. can I create a step in the derivation to keep the original FM assignments from the previous documents....is there something to do with field status??
    Thanks in Advance
    Chris

    Hi
    Please read carefully tye warehouse concept
    Excample warehouse concept II
    >At PR no FM update
    >At PO no FM update
    >AT GR no FM update
    >AT consumption on Cost center, WBS or Internal order FM is updated and AVC is checked
    Read the release note of ERP 6 or ERP5 the customising of Warehouse concept is well explained
    In sumary:
    Create a stock commitment item statistically
    Create a warehouse funds center
    Create a funds
    Create a derivation rule for warehouse concept 2
    Create a derivation rule where you have plant, valuation class and warehouse funds center
    Cretae a derivation rule fund>warehouse funds center>stock commitment item
    Go in customising integration to make field status for assignement FM account asignments
    Select PO and PR and make optional the funds, funds cenbter, commitment item
    And when you will create a PR or PO FM data will come automatically
    ciao
    Salvator
    PSM-FM Consultant
    BXL

  • Profit Center Derivation in Service (CS) order

    Hello All,
    I need some inputs / clarifications on below query.
    Service Order is being created with internal / external labors / services / materials. Debit memo request has been created.
    In Service Order & Debit Memo Request, Profit center has been derived from Responsible work center which has been maintained in Main Work Center in Header tab of Service order.
    Hope, this is standard functionality.
    But I want to get the Profit Center based on my reference technical object. I understand by going through many threads that profit center derivation from technical object's cost center can be done only though development as suggested in Profit center substitution in IW31/ IW32.
    Just by having curiosity as this thread had been posted in 2009, is there any new enhancement or functionality by which profit center can be derived from technical object's cost center??
    Looking forward your suggestions...

    Maheswaran KD,
    Yes, as standard the profit centre is determined from the cost centre in the main work centre.
    Have a look at user-exit IWO10005: Maintenance order: Customer specific determination of profit centre
    PeteA

  • No funds center derived for GR IR account

    Dear all,
    We have faced a strange issue in Funds Management. We have a GR IR GL account for which system automatically derives the commitment item and fund center based on those in the PO. That is, whatever FC and CI are maintained in the PO, the GR IR account derives the same accounts during MIRO.
       However this is true only for material POs. We have created a service PO for a specific network of a project. In this particular case the system is not allowing us to post the invoice as it cannot derive the fund center. It seems during MIRO, the FM accounts of PO are not getting linked to the GR IR account. Please note that GR (or service entry sheet entry) is not relevant for budget consumption. Budget consumption takes place during PR,PO and MIRO.
    Request your input in this regard.
    Thanks
    Snigdho

    Hi,
    First of all, you need to be sure that all existent correction notes are implemented in your system.
    Please check if the following notes are applied in your system (including manual steps):
    1289547 FM account assignment incorrect in GR/IR clearing in service
    1327560 GR Account Assignments based on previoustly posted SES
    1429223 GR Account Assignments based on previoustly posted SES II
    1450965 FM account assignment incorrectly inherited from PO
    1480503 FM account assignment for GL line overwritten in MIRO
    1502874 Planned Delivery Costs are not updated during GR/IR postings
    These notes correct wrong behaviours in include LFMCOBLF06 related to account assignment.
    If the notes are not there but are valid to your current release/package, please apply all in one test system and retest your issue.
    Regarding inheriting the FM assignments,  material po's can retrieve the FM account assignments from the FM tables. 
    This ensures that the current FM account assigments are always used.
    However, in the case of Services, it is not possible to use the FM tables as it is not guaranteed that the correct Account assigment will be retrieved.  So, the SES table ESKN is used instead. The ESKN record is created at the time the SES is created.
    In Summary: Due to the structure of Service documents, the FM tables cannot be used to access the previous document's account assignment.  Material documents can use the FM tables to get the previous account assignemnt.  So, for Material documents, FMDERIVE does not need to be called when a predecessor document is found. However, FMDERIVE needs to be called for SES because the SES application table does not store FM fields.  So, this needs to be rederived.
    I suggest you also to read SAP Note 923672 (do not apply it).
    The account assignments on the SES screen are indeed changable. This is part of the standard design for SES process. Unfortunately, FM cannot control if the fields on the account assignment popup screen should be in edit, display, or hidden mode.  This screen is control by SES, therefore is good that you check also this customizing in MM:
    IMG - Materials Management - Purchasing - Account Assignment - Maintain Account Assignment Categories
    In this activity, for the account assignment category which is the account assignment category used in the P.O., you have flag 'Acct. Assg. Changeable', then, the account assignment should be derived again. Not sure if you can restrict by different processes and for SES have this flag not marked so FMDERIVE will be not called and the FM account assignments would be inherit from the PO.
    From my understanding, if the PO concern is a service PO, it is legitimate to accept the service (via ML81N) with different account assignments.  Hence, the account assignment fields are not hidden or in display mode only.
    From FM point of view, if a user does not deliberately change the account assignments on the SES screen or FMDERIVE is not setup to overwrite the FM account assignments, then by default the FM account assignments are inherited from the PO.
    I hope this helps to overcome your issue.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • MB1A and Cost Center (KOSTL) based on Order (AUFNR)

    Hello,
    I have a requirement, where i must make a modification in transaction MB1A in the following way:
    On the second screen "Enter Goods Issue: New items" i must fill automatically the Cost Center field, based on the Order number (after the Enter).
    How can I do this?
    I've tried with a substitution in GGB1 but it didn't worked:
    select single kostv from coas into cobl-kostl where aufnr = cobl-aufnr.
    Thanks in advance !
    Tohi

    HI
    Can you check the below exits
    Transaction Code - MB1A                     Goods Withdrawal
    Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description
    Enhancement
    MBCF0002                                Customer function exit: Segment text in material doc. item
    MBCF0005                                Material document item for goods receipt/issue slip
    MBCF0006                                Customer function for WBS element
    MBCF0007                                Customer function exit: Updating a reservation
    MBCF0009                                Filling the storage location field
    MBCF0010                                Customer exit: Create reservation BAPI_RESERVATION_CREATE1
    MBCF0011                                Read from RESB and RKPF for print list in  MB26
    MB_CF001                                Customer Function Exit in the Case of Updating a Mat. Doc.
    BADI
    MB_MIGO_BADI                            BAdI in MIGO for External Detail Subscreens
    MB_MIGO_ITEM_BADI                       BAdI in MIGO for Changing Item Data
    MB_PHYSINV_INTERNAL                     Connection: Core Inventory and Retail AddOn
    MB_QUAN_CHECK_BADI                      BAdI: Item Data at Time of Quantity Check
    MB_RESERVATION_BADI                     MB21/MB22: Check and Complete Dialog Data
    MB_RESERVATION_SCR                      Screen BAdI for Retrofit DFPS
    MB_RESERVATION_UPCHD                    BAdI for Creation and Changing of Manual Reservations
    MB_RES_BAPI_CHANGE                      BAdI: Execution of Changes to Reservation Fields
    MB_RES_BAPI_CREATE1                     BAdI: Adoption of Customer's Own Fields as Reserv. Fields
    MB_RES_BAPI_DETAIL1                     BAdI: Display of Customer's Own Fields in Reservations
    MB_STOR_LOC_BADI_GTS                    BADI to Check and Change Storage Location (GTS Fct. Only)

  • Profit Center as fund center

    Hi,
    I have created Cost Centers as Fund Centers for Expenses and Profit Centers as Fund Centers for Revenues. Now I have posted one vendor invoice vide transaction code FB60. The fund center derived by sytsm is a profit center which is attached to the cost center. Is this the stadard behviour? Becuase I have budgeted the items against the fund center which is created against the cost center. I want system to derive the fund center which is based on the cost center and not the one which is based on profit center.
    How do I resolve this? Please advise
    Shailesh

    Hi,
    Tried to make the derivation rule as under:
    Source Field: Proft Center
    Target Field: Cost Center
    Condition: for Commitmnet Item < 4XXXXX (as we have expenses starting with 4 & revenues starting with 3).
    Is anyting I need to modify? Pls advise..
    Regards
    Shailesh
    Eli: I got your point, but I need revenues to be budgted, we budget them as per profit centers...

  • FM Account Assignment is incomplete (Funds Center)

    Dear all,
    We are upgrading from 4.6C to 6.0, when i am post invoice to accounts it shows the message FM Account Assignment is Incomplete (Funds Center). I think in order i have to enter Fund Center but in order it dosenot enter me the funds center at item level in Account assignment category.
    Can any one please give some solution for the same.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Pankaj

    Dear Pankaj
    Reproducing the extract taken from "Funds Management" of SAP which I though would be helpful to you
    If the system can determine an FM account assignment from the FM-CO assignment table, this appears as the default value.
    If the sytem cannot determine an FM account assignment, you must enter one by choosing Assignments -> Funds Management.
    The FM account assignments that you have to enter depends on the field control.  You should choose this in a such a way that you have to enter the funds center and, if required the fund.
    Owing to the account assignment logic applying in Funds Management, the system can derive the commitment automatically in the subsequent postings - for example, from the G/L Account or Cost element.  If the commitment item is derived from the cost element, you should ensure that the same commitment item is assigned to the primary cost elements and to the settlement cost elements.
    As long as the FM account assignment in a network/network activity is not complete according to the field control, the order status HMKU (FM account assignment incomplete) is active.  This status prevents automatic generation of purchase requisitions for components and services procured externally as well as releasing the order.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Derivation of fund center based on purchasing group

    Hi,
    It is required to determine the fund center based on purchasing group (during PR creation). I  have gone through one thread which suggests inclusion of the field EKGRP into FMDERIVE, then to COBL.
       However I was trying to check whether it can be done through table lookup using field USERTEMP1 and assigning the same to EKGRP. But in the table lookup screen, the upper part contains the fields BANFN (Purchase Requisition Number) and BNFPO (Item Number of Purchase Requisition) which need to be assigned to source fields. I am not sure what source fields should be assigned and how it will  work.
    Request your input in this regard.
    Thanks in advance!
    Snigdho.

    Hi,
    I am trying to derive fund center based on purchasing group using field USERTEMP1. In the upper part of table lookup screen (I am using table EBAN) what should I assign to the fields BANFN and BNFPO?
    Thanks
    Snigdho

  • Error while doing miro of network purchase order ( no funds center entered/

    Hi,
    we are facing one problem while doing miro of network  service purchase order. System is giving message 'No funds center entered/derived in item 00030'.
    We have activated funds management in Jul'10. The said network service PO belong to previous year. Also we have changed
    commitment item of GL account related to concerned service order in Jul'10 & posted GRN one in apr'10 & one aug'10.
    System is not allowing to cancel the service entry sheet.
    Can anybody help on this.
    regards
    abhishek

    we had activated the trace facility for FMDEIRIVE & found that all FC/Commitment item derived correctly. But while posting the document it is throwing an error.
    Regards
    Abhishek

  • Error while Updating Fund Center in Work Order

    Hi All,
    In out System, we have integrated PM-FM. in that, we have incorporated a "User-Exit" which populates the User a change-of "Cost Centre" just while saving the order; where the User can insert any other Cost center other than the one already picked & displayed by the System.
    The problem now in FM is that; the initially displayed cost center prior to the update of cost center; is the one that is picked by the FM Derivation Strategy; which does not get updated when the new cost center is updated.
    Hence, although the Order contains a new Cost center; the Fund Center displayed is the one that was mapped to the prior cost center according to the FM Derivation Strategy in FMDerive.
    Kindly help !!
    Thanks in Advance.................
    Regards,
    Pratham

    Sahu
    Can you also post a screen-shot of the error message popup.
    PeteA

  • How to derive Cost  center from Funds Center

    Hi,
    i post a GR (Return item) and i have a difference of price, i want to assign this difference (assined to a Gl Account)  to a Cost center please how to do that ? i have a Funds Center entered in this GR, can i derive the cost center from this Funds Center ?
    Please Help.
    Regards.

    Hi,
    There is no 'derivation' funcitionality as such available. Thoough, you can build a CO substitution via OKC9 and, based on your fund centre, set the cost centre value.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • FM Derivation form cost center to fund center

    Hi,
    I have defined in FM DERIVE cost center = fund center. In pm order cost center is derived from the work center. But the fund center is not coming there, which is defined in FMDERIVE for this cost center .
    Please help to resolve the issue.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Check whether FM- CO INTEGRATION IS ACTIVE,

Maybe you are looking for