Fund managment period change

How to change fund managment period from existing (APRIL TO MARCH) TO OCT TO SEPTEMBER.
WE ARE TRYING TO CHANGE THAT USING
public cector mgmt
fund mgmnt govt
basic setting
fiscal year setting
define fiscal year setting
there we have v3 as april to march and
v9 as oct to sept
originally we had assigned v3 to Financial year and to fund mgmt period both.
but now we want to assign v9 to fund mgmt period.
But system is not allowing us to do that. How can we achive it and what are the reasons for errors.

Hi,
If you already post to FM then you can't change the FY variant. The only way I see is:
A) Delete all posting.
B) Change the setting
C) Reload by "subsequent" transactions.
In case you direct post to FM (E.G budget) you have to reenter. Alternativerly, if you have mass data you entered, write a small program that download the line items and reload after the changes (you can use CATT or ECATT to load the flat file you create).
Hope this help you.
Benni

Similar Messages

Funds Management and Fiscal Year Variant Change

Hello !
We are configuring a new fiscal year variant.
Currently, the system is on a CALENDAR YEAR FY variant and we are doing the following:
1. creating a shortened FY of Jan 2009 - Mar 2009
2. new fiscal year from April 2009 - Mar 2010
We are trying to change the FY variant for Funds Management via OF15 but receive the error FI674.
FI674:
You must not change the fiscal year variant in Cash Budget Management or Funds Management for FM area FM01 if actual data already exists for FM area FM01, or if one or more of the company codes assigned to FM area FM01 is active.
We have found oss note 719597 which details how to change the FY variant for Cash Budget Mgmt, but it does not apply to Funds management.
I could find no other supporting documentation.
Can anyone guide us as to how to deal with this issue?
Thank=you !

Hello Patti,
The point is that it is not possible to change fiscal year variant if actual values exists.
You are trying to do a change in January. You probably have some postings in 2009 already.
In the area of PSM-FM there is no note like 719597 of TR-CB.
Only if no actual values exist, this customizing change would be possible and reasonable.
If you are doing this setting in your customizing client, you can delete the postings (please DO NOT do it if you are in production) that exist in 2009 and try again.
SAP do not recommend to change a Fiscal Year Variant that has already been assigned to a company code and has already some postings. This may create database inconsistencies.
You can create another Fiscal Year Variant with the information that you want to be customize, and this variant you will be able to assign to a company code. Before you assign this new variant to a company
code please be sure that none of the information that you already posted in this company code will be affected, this information you may review it with your consultant on-site.
Also please review/apply note 173636, 202687, 10945, 193713, 123026, 210861 which may happen in your system.
The fiscal period is related to the posting date via the fiscal year variant. E.g.: I you do a posting on 5.5.2009 it will be posted e.g. in period 5 for fiscal year variant 'A'. This period is not only used in the document header table (BKPF,VBRK,MKPF ...) but also in several balance table (GLT0, KNC1 ...) not only in FI but also in SD, MM, CO .... If in the new fiscal year variant 'B' this posting date is related to another period e.g. 7 the relation between documents and Periods and balances will be destroyed.
The problem will be enhanced if the posting-date would be related to diffrent fiscal years.
In addition several reports in AP/AR and GL reread period-depend data by selecting the posting-date regardless of the period in the document because it's not normal practise to change the fiscal year variant of a company code.
Some of the involved issues are:
- FM actuals and commitments may need to be reconstructed if their period- (or even fiscal year-) assignments is changed.
- FM actuals/commitments can not be reconstructed if fiscal year change activities have already been performed (commitment carry forward, FMJ1, FMJ2).
- Budgeting data and assigned values may principally be concerned as well, especially if you are working with period values in budgeting.
The change of fiscal year variant has several implications and should be analyzed very carefully.
Please check note below for more information:
Note 672255 Shortened fiscal year / changing fiscal periods
I hope it helps you and good luck
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

PSM-FM-Reversal of funds management document after change in acc.assignment

Good day we recently went live with a component of Funds Management i.e. Availability Control on Cost centers and cost elements. We update BCS with the plan values and actual/commitment items in Finance/CO. We do our planning in CO.
The solution is working reasonably well but we have encountered a problem for which we are unable to find a solution. The problem is best illustrated with an example;
1. Create purchase requisition with Account Assignment Category "K" = Cost Center with transaction ME51N
2. Account assignment = cost center and cost element. A funds management document is created upon saving of the transaction.
3. Purchase Req. is released with a release strategy (transaction ME54N)
4. After purchase requisition release the account assignment for the cost element is changed by the user. This occurs sometimes during the execution of the business process.
5. When a purchase order is created with reference to this purchase requisition with transaction ME59N the system references the original funds management document which means when the account assignment was changed the funds management document was not reversed and a new funds management document created for the changed account assignment.
6. The BUDCON report transaction FMRP_RW_BUDCON thus displays the commitment under the incorrect commitment item as the change in account assignment is not reflected in Funds Management. We have a one to one relationship between cost elements/commitment items and cost centers/funds centers as per the derivation strategy.
My question is;
Is this normal standard SAP standard behavior or are we missing some configuration that will enable the creation of a new funds management document and if so where do we configure such? I must mention our solution is completely SAP standard.
Thank you in advance.
Best Regards
Mike Olwagen
Manager SAP Solution Support
City Power (JHB) (Pty) Ltd

Hi Mike, nice to meet you.
I think u should do an entire test with TRACE on, and u will find the problem, and how to fix it (at FMDERIVE of course).
First: Have a look at note [666322|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/666322], go to FMDERIVE and turn ON the trace.
Then, run all the process ... from ME51N to the end...
I agree with Eli, u must allow overwriting of existing values at FMDERIVE rule...
Regards,
Osvaldo.

Funds management commitment carry forward

hi,
we have got funds management activated in our system. we started a new fiscal year and i ran fmj2 to carryforward all FM commitments. now when i try to changed purchase orders created in the previous fiscal year i get an error "Document item 10124941/00001 has not yet been carried forward to the current year". please advise.

Also you have carry out year end closing for FI & MM. then you have to carry forward the balance to next year. for goto periodic processing closing then carry forward here you will find 3 steps 1. determine 2. calculate 3. execute.
There may slight variation but this activity has to be done.
Regards,
Manish Jain'

|Funds Management - relating to PR/PO

I am getting another error in Funds Management:
Posting date must be used for update of value type 000100 update profile 50
Message no. FI_E008
Diagnosis
FM areas with assignment to the update profile must have all their value types defined as 'posting date' on the ledger level when activating to period-based encumbrance tracking (PBET) on the ledger level.
Procedure
Find all the FM areas using the update profile in transaction 'OF37'.
Use transaction OF36 to ensure that all value types in the FM area(s) are using 'posting date' for the ledger that is being activated to PBET.

Hi,
It's what the system says. You have to ensure, that you don't overwrite profile 0100 in OF36 with other date, than posting date.
Regards,
Eli

Funds Management cut over of Open PR and PO

Hi,
In case of cutover, we are using following link to update FM account assignment in open PR/PO.
SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Select Documents
and
SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Convert Worklist
1) But in this case, for open PO of which GR is not done FMRP_RW_BUDCON report is not updated after doing above mentioned process. when I make GR, commitment get updated in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report. This does not show actual status of budget consumption as budget consumption is shown at the time of GR only.
2) If GR is already done for PO and after doing above mentioned process, if GR get reversed then Negetive commitment shows in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report and after deletion of that respected PO, commitment of PO gets zero. But negetive GR commitment remains open which leads to wrong status of budget consumption. e.g. GR of Rs 5000 is reversed. Then report shows two documents as -5000 for GR reversed and 5000 for PO commitment getting open. IF I reversed this PO then PO commitment of 5000 become zero. but GR reversing amount -5000 still remains open. So it shows less consumption of budget by Rs.5000.
Do I am missing any process. Suggest.

Hi,
Firstly, after you convert the open commitments, you'll need to run FMAVCREINIT to reconstruct AVC. FMRP_RW_BUDCON will then reflect the converted commitments.
Secondly, based on your posting, it seems that you do not want PO commitments (VT 51) to be counted as budget consumption. You can achieve this in the ledger 9H configuration:
Public sector management > Funds management government > BCS > Availability control > Settings for availability control ledger > Define filter settings for commitment/actual values. You will want to exclude both value type 50 and 51 from ledger 9H. After you change the setting, you will need to run FMAVCREINIT again.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ming

Error while settlement of WBS - Funds Management

Hi,
We have maintain derivation rule as - WBS to Fund Center. This Fund center is DUMMY because we need not want to control WBS through Funds Management.
There is always one Cost center in each WBS. while settling this WBS we are getting error as -
Asset ABC 000127000000 0000: no subnumber with FM assignment DUMMY / /
Message no. AW851
ABC - Company code
000127000000 - asset number
DUMMY - Fund center
suggest.

alex ice wrote:
Hi, 1 change FC in AS02 to dummy if it applicable.
> 2 Check note 618269 it applicable.
> 3 remove FC from asset master data
Hi Alex, how are u!?
I've got the same issue than Harsh Vaidya in my system ...
Ive already read this notes: [618269|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/618269] (no apply to me, because Joint Venture Accounting isn't active), [844262|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/844262], [1473357|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1473357], [446029|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/446029] and [440396|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/440396]
All very interesting notes :P
But... I couldn't find the solution
I try to TRACE from FMDERIVE too, but when I go to KO88, FMDERIVE's trace doesn't track anything.
Any help to throw some more light on this thread, would be very useful.
Thanks a lot!
Regards from Argentine.

Down payment in fund management

Hi,
When i am posting a down payment in reference to purchase order, budget is carried back by system automatically which was committed at the time of creation of Purchase Order. It may lead to actual procurement exceeding the budget as budget is reduces.
For example:
Purchase Order created - 100 USD (Budget is committed by 100 USD)
Down payment created against PO - 100 USD (Budget commited by purchase order is carried back automatically)
It means another PO can be created for for 100 USD till the time down payment is not cleared.
Can anybody guide me to stop reversal of budget commitment at down payment.
Further, standard update profile 350 is used where down payment & down payment request are marked as 'Statistical Update'. SAP version is ECC 604.
Thanks
Manish

Hi Mar,
I had seen this SAP note before posting thread.
I have some doubts in regard to implementing above note which are as follows:
1. In update profile Down payment request & Down payment is marked for statistical update then why it is impacting funds
2. SAP Note says that it is a modification & SAP will withdraw support after implementation of note. What are the changes take place once note is implemented:
      a. Whether I would not be able to make down payment against purchase order line item?
      b. If i can not make payment then this note is of no use as i want to track down payment against purchase order.
      c. If i can make the down payment against purchase order, will it not impact purchase order history?
                                                                                OR
      d. this change will only impact fund management & down payment document will not impact fund management
Thanks

Relations with Fund Management and Ledger in General Ledger Accounting

We have already defined Leading Ledger in General Ledger Accounting. After activating the Fund Management, Leading Ledger is not displayed. We can not use FB01, FB03. How can we solve this problem?
Wbr.

Dear expert
use transaction FB01L or Fb03L,
i think You dont need to change any settings, as mentioned above you have to select the respective ledger and post in FB01L or FBO3L
Regards
Ajeesh.s

Fund Management - Issues in Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6

Hello,
We are upgrading SAP Application for a client who is on 4.6C to ECC6. The client is currently using Funds Management in 4.6C. With ECC6 I understand that this functionality is moved into Public Sector and is available only on activation of IS-PS Extension Set.
The question I have is that does this activation impact any other business processes or is just a technical activation.
What I mean is that if I activate this extension set does the system start doing things differently and needs specific data related to Public Sector which the business users will be required to be entered while doing transactions OR the activation will not impact business processes as such and would work as earlier with Funds management active. (except where there was a change in the functionality between 4.6C to ECC6)
I would like to know the risks, if any involved in upgrading Funds Management from 4.6C to ECC6.
Please reply and let me know any question to get more clarity on the issue.
Best Regards
Kuldeep

Hi Kuldeep,
There are several main issues that have to be addresses when upgrading from 4.6 to ECC6. The main ones are:
1 - Derivations. The object are no longer connected through tables or master data entries (you may have a table that links Cost Centers to Funds Centers for example). These assignments are now maintained through a flexible derivation tool. These derivation rules have to be maintaind, or the posting addresses will have no FM values and you will not be able to post any documents.
2 - Inventory purchases. The inventory purchases scenarios are no longer maintained through the customization (you can no longer choose one of the 4 inventory scenarios, and there's no warehouse Funds Center). These are all maintained through derivations.
3 - BCS. There's a new budgeting and AVC tool called "Budget Control System" (BCS). You can either activate it, or keep working with the old budgeting (called "former" in the customization). The new BCS affords flexibility in budgeting and AVC, including several AVC ledgers.
More data regarding migrations can be found in documentation. If you want, I can send you the PDF document.
Best regards,
Shahaf Yaari
[email protected]

Runtime Error due to activating Fund Management

Hi,
I had activated Funds Management in SAP. I started getting Run Time Errors. I deactivated the Fund Management. But still the Run Time Error is there. I am attaching the file for your reference.
I enquired with the Basis consultant who is telling this is a Functional problem, hence I need to solve this. I checked all the configurations, but could not find the exact problem.
Can anybody tell me how this can be resolved.
Note: This error is showing in Quality Server. There was a copying from Production to Quality.

In the error I see the statement before the dump comes is PERFORM exit--entry_from_table | | 1039| IN PROGRAM (-callback_report)
That sounds like an user exit from a table that is not there.
You say you had a copy from production. It could be that a user exit which was not implemented yet in production and therefore not in the exit table. is now also not present anymore in your Q system after the copy. Were there any changes about to go to production ?
Also in the dump I read the comment:
| 1063|* version and guid are used by strategy -> further params for generated | | 1064|* routines. guid is only used for reference purposes and not returned at | | 1065|* the moment
That could possibly mean that this is a generated program. Maybe you need to regenerate it.
I also see: STEP--METHOD_DRULE
That could mean that these have something to do with rules that have not been maintained.
You could ask a programmer to debug the program and see where SAP tries to get the rules and exit information from (which table) .
Maybe that give you a clue what is going wrong.
If you have a table name start SM30 and click customizing. If it opens a customizing transaction then that is where you need to maintain entries.

Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management

Hello All,
We are implementing the Funds Management in the middle of the Fiscal year, now all the settings are done and budget also uploaded.
Now my question is How to convert the previous documents into funds management which were posted from the year starting 01.04.2008.(FI and MM documents including park documents)
For this I am refering the following IMG steps, i.e Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management-Supplementary Account Assignment-Select Documents-Convert Worklist-Display Worklist
Here I am unable to understand what is happening in the first step and second step
Can any one pls clarify and give correct solution
Regards
Uma

Hello Uma,
In PSM-FM you have similar processes in two-steps (select and run), first selecting the data and after that processing the data.
In the step "Select Documents" (step 1) you select the documents, based on your selection criteria, for which you want to provide a supplementary account assignment within your company code. The documents selected are displayed in a worklist.
You can provide the documents with a supplementary account assignment in an additional step by converting the worklist (step 2).
In the Convert Worklist section (step 2), you add account assignments to the documents contained in the work list (generated by the step 1) for your FM area. The documents to which an account assignment is added are displayed in a list which shows the original account assignment and the changed account assignment for each document.
With each program run, the system assigns a run number. You can use this run number as a selection criterion for selective deletion or selective display of the work list. This is very useful if you do not want to do the running process (convert worklist) in one step, you can convert in more than one step.
To convert (step 2) you must first have selected the documents (step 1) to which you want to add an account assignment.
For example, you can in the step 1 select ALL the documents that you want to convert and in the step 2 you can split in more than one process (due to performance or checking reasons) the data generated in the step 1.
The option "Display Worklist" is to check the worklist generated in the step 1 for a specific FM area based on particular selection criteria. If no data was deleted from the worklist, the worklist contains all the information on the supplementary account assignment:
The system assigns a run number during each program run for converting the work list. You can use this number as a selection criterion when displaying the work list.
You can display these documents by starting the program without specifying a run number.
You can test this process with a single document in step 1 and step2 and you will see that the step 1 only makes the document as selected and the real change will happen in the step2.
I hope I could clarify the process
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Issue when activing Global Funds Management Function(PSM-FM)

Hi Peers,
I tried to active Global Funds Management Function(PSM-FM) in IMG. A message "Aktivierung des Haushaltsmanagements ist nicht erlaubt" poped up. And I also only have read access to Active/Deactive Funds Management but SU53 shows authorization check is ok.
What should I do for next? Thanks
Regards,
Eunice

Hi,
I am facing the same issue regarding "Read Access Only" to the activation of Funds Management under Actual and Commitment Update/Integration.
I've checked the component activation and found that
1) ES-PS is activated under SPRO
2) IS-PS is checked under BF11, but the checkbox status is greyed, so that it's impossible to change it.
I've tried to delete the IS-PS entry and re-insert it...the action was successful but the issue remained...
Any clues?
Thanks

Travel Management & Funds Management integration

Hello Experts,
During creation of a travel request & when I am entering amount in "Estimated Costs" field, I am getting an error message as "Error creating commitment: Trip status has been set to 'open'. Message no. PTRA_WEB_INTERFACE098". This is due to Funds Management activation by the FICO team. My client requires budget check in Travel Management.
From my side I have created an expense type with details like:-
Short name: for example, Estimated Costs
○ Travel Expense Category: Other
○ Amounts are: Estimated Costs, No Reimbursement to Employee
Do I need to maintain symbolic & G/L for the same? Is there any other config I am missing.
Please help to solve the issue.
Regards,
Daniel

Can you check for config in V_T706B1 for Estimated Costs with name should be ESTC
you need to change it ESTC.
If you have activated the integration to funds management, the system tries to create a commitment for the entered estimated cost. For this it is necessary, as the error message says, to create an expense type for the estimated cost in V_T706B1 with the use 'Estimated Cost'.
This expense type is then inserted in the trip and later on, when your create the expense report, you are forced to delete this
expense type again.
If you have the funds management active, you need to go to maintainance view V_T706B1 and create an expense type for which you choose out of the 'special use' drop down box the value 'extimated cost, no reimbursement'.
This was new functionality with ERP2005 but this is unusual as almost all PTRA_WEB_INTERFACE174 or error messages as you see are the result of incorrect definition of estimated cost in V_T706B1 - is there an entry for this in V_T706B4 by any chance that would cause the inconsistency?
Hope this could help!
Thanks

Funda Management

Hi friends,
Please find the below requirement.
      Fund centre owners to be able to make transfers without notification to planning, up to a certain amount or percentage on category, for specific fund centres, budget categories and period, according to rules set by planning.
       is there any way to maitain Authorizations for fund centre, commitment items, period, and %on available amounts.
     Transfer beyond restrictions and thresholds should trigger approval workflow from Finance.
would appreciate your fatest reply
thanks in advance.
Ram.....

Hi Ramu ,
The following link may be useful to u to understand the concept of funds management.
Funds Management allows management to set budgets for revenues and expenses within your company as well as track these to the area of responsibility.
Funds management
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/FIFM/FIFM.pdf
http://sapsuperusers.com/forums/local_links.php?catid=1&linkid=715
http://ot.bloomu.edu/Documents/SAP/Word%20Docs/New/SAPReportsJan2006.pdf
nagesh

Fund managment period change

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for