Funds Management Activation

Hi Experts,
We are at Version EA -PS - 600 - SAP Enterprise Extension Public Services ,. We have activated EA-PS .Component .
While in IMG , try to activate   , system  throwing following error message :
Activate Global Funds Management Functions (PSM-FM) - System ,Function is not possible; application IS-PS is not active
Message no. FI292
Diagnosis
Activating the Funds Management Government functions at client level requires the cross-client activation of the application.
System Response
The Funds Management functions are not activated.
Procedure
First activate the cross-client IS-PS application by using transaction FIBF under Settings -> Identification -> SAP Applications.
If we go and see above Path : IS -PS , check box is in NOT CHANGABLE . 
Please sugges us to activate the same.
Regards,
Sujana

Hi Osvaldo,
I am facing the same problem.
I was working on:  Define Planning Layout
Public Sector Management >> Funds Management Government >> Budget Control System (BCS) >> Budgeting >> Budget Entry >> Planning >> Define Planning Layout
The msg being:  function is not possible funds management is not active
As above, I tried to run under SE38: RFFM_ACTIVATE_BCSETS.
The msg being:
Transport request "IDSK900213" contains no incomplete structures
Transport request "IDSK900213" contains no incomplete enhanncements
Activation of BC Set EA-PS-AKH terminated
Activation of BC Set EA-PS-IMG terminated
Activation of BC Set EA-PS-MENU terminated
Iam using ECC 6 Version. I would be highly obliged if you could suggest me on this.
Thanking in Advance,
Raghav.

Similar Messages

  • After Funds Management activation we got error in travel managment

    Hi All,
      After activating funds management in the system, while creating a travel request we got the following error. Anyone can help on this, for idenifying the problem.
    In the travel request portal we are getting this error :
    " com.sap.tc.webdynpro.modelimpl.dynamicrfc.WDDynamicRFCExecuteException:      No expense type for estimated costs has been defined. Cannot save   , error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE     and          No expense type for estimated costs has been defined. Cannot save   , error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE "
    regards,
    Sabari Prabhu.

    Hi
    I have a question, I udnerstand in (Create one expense type "Estimated Costs") but my question is in using transaction
    When you start using the trip transaction and select a travel request the system send you to the TP04 transaction... now
    with this new function, I have to use the transaction PR05 its right? becouse the TP04 ask the VORS expense type, and sap says to dont delete record
    Please could you tell me with wich transaction you start to create a travel request? I have the same problem of the screen but Im not sure to use the TP04 transaction wit this solution
    Thanks a lot

  • Funds Management  activation in Real Estate module

    HI,
    How to activate Funds Management in Real Estate module. Can any body help in this.

    Hi,
    I donu2019t know if I really understand what you are searchingu2026 Nevertheless the table that you can find the profit center is the VITMOA, this is linked to the condition thru the TERMTYPE of the object and the term TERMNO associated to the condition. Please consider that the posting assignment (e.g. prctr) will be assign via hierarchy since you can assign it to the contract level, a rental object level, building level, and so onu2026
    Regards,
    DAS

  • Fund Management - Issues in Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6

    Hello,
    We are upgrading SAP Application for a client who is on 4.6C to ECC6. The client is currently using Funds Management in 4.6C. With ECC6 I understand that this functionality is moved into Public Sector and is available only on activation of IS-PS Extension Set.
    The question I have is that does this activation impact any other business processes or is just a technical activation.
    What I mean is that if I activate this extension set does the system start doing things differently and needs specific data related to Public Sector which the business users will be required to be entered while doing transactions OR the activation will not impact business processes as such and would work as earlier with Funds management active. (except where there was a change in the functionality between 4.6C to ECC6)
    I would like to know the risks, if any involved in upgrading Funds Management from 4.6C to ECC6.
    Please reply and let me know any question to get more clarity on the issue.
    Best Regards
    Kuldeep

    Hi Kuldeep,
    There are several main issues that have to be addresses when upgrading from 4.6 to ECC6. The main ones are:
    1 - Derivations. The object are no longer connected through tables or master data entries (you may have a table that links Cost Centers to Funds Centers for example). These assignments are now maintained through a flexible derivation tool. These derivation rules have to be maintaind, or the posting addresses will have no FM values and you will not be able to post any documents.
    2 - Inventory purchases. The inventory purchases scenarios are no longer maintained through the customization (you can no longer choose one of the 4 inventory scenarios, and there's no warehouse Funds Center). These are all maintained through derivations.
    3 - BCS. There's a new budgeting and AVC tool called "Budget Control System" (BCS). You can either activate it, or keep working with the old budgeting (called "former" in the customization). The new BCS affords flexibility in budgeting and AVC, including several AVC ledgers.
    More data regarding migrations can be found in documentation. If you want, I can send you the PDF document.
    Best regards,
    Shahaf Yaari
    [email protected]

  • Travel Management & Funds Management integration

    Hello Experts,
    During creation of a travel request & when I am entering amount in "Estimated Costs" field, I am getting an error message as "Error creating commitment: Trip status has been set to 'open'. Message no. PTRA_WEB_INTERFACE098". This is due to Funds Management activation by the FICO team. My client requires budget check in Travel Management.
    From my side I have created an expense type with details like:-
    Short name: for example, Estimated Costs
    ○  Travel Expense Category: Other
    ○  Amounts are: Estimated Costs, No Reimbursement to Employee
    Do I need to maintain symbolic & G/L for the same? Is there any other config I am missing.
    Please help to solve the issue.
    Regards,
    Daniel

    Can you check for config in V_T706B1  for Estimated Costs  with name should be  ESTC
    you need to change it  ESTC.
    If you have activated the integration to funds management, the system tries to create a commitment for the entered estimated cost. For this it is necessary, as the error message says, to create an expense type for the estimated cost in V_T706B1 with the use 'Estimated Cost'.
    This expense type is then inserted in the trip and later on, when your create the expense report, you are forced to delete this
    expense type again.
    If you have the funds management active, you need to go to maintainance view V_T706B1 and create an expense type for which you choose out of the 'special use' drop down box the value 'extimated cost, no reimbursement'.
    This was new functionality with ERP2005 but this is unusual as almost all PTRA_WEB_INTERFACE174 or error messages as you see are the result of incorrect definition of estimated cost in V_T706B1 - is there an entry for this in V_T706B4 by any chance that would cause the inconsistency?
    Hope this could help!
    Thanks

  • Funds management and project budgeting

    Hi
    We have funds managment activated for operational expenses(OPEX).
    Project budget will be used for all CAPEX requirements. However, there will be common G/L accounts used in both operational expenses and capital expenses. For eg. steel could be issued both for projects as well as maintenance activities.
    Please clarify on the following:
    1) How to avoid duplication of budgets in PS and FM.
    2) Can we forego PS budgetings and depend on only FM budgeting to meet the above issue. Can't we achieve the PS budgeting functionality in FM.
    3) What differentiates or advantages we get in PS budget over FM budget.
    Regards
    Srikrishna

    Srikrishna,
    I am not aware of FM, but for the point mentioned by you
    However, there will be common G/L accounts used in both operational expenses and capital expenses. For eg. steel could be issued both for projects as well as maintenance activities.
    You can over come this by using valuation class in the material master Acoounting1 view. There you have 2 valuation classes
    1. Valuation class - this is used for operational purposes  and this valuation class will have set of G/L accounts mentioned in IMG for determining different process like, inventory, consumption etc...
    2. Project Valuation Class - This is used for Project (when you mention account assignment as Q in PR or PO) system will read this valuation class, if no value exists in this field, it reads Valuation class. Again if the value in this field is different than the Valuation class, then it will contain different set of G/L account, with help of this you can distinguish the operative and Project G/L accounts and inventory / consumption separately.
    Hope this may help you.
    Regards,
    Praveen

  • Funds management commitment carry forward

    hi,
    we have got funds management activated in our system. we started a new fiscal year and i ran fmj2 to carryforward all FM commitments. now when i try to changed purchase orders created in the previous fiscal year i get an error "Document item 10124941/00001 has not yet been carried forward to the current year". please advise.

    Also you have carry out year end closing for FI & MM. then you have to carry forward the balance to next year. for goto periodic processing closing then carry forward here you will find 3 steps 1. determine 2. calculate 3. execute.
    There may slight variation but this activity has to be done.
    Regards,
    Manish Jain'

  • Funds Management - FAGLFLEXT VS FMGLFLEXT

    Gurus,
    Regarding Funds Management activation, we are using totals table FAGLFLEXT in order to have information of Consolidation, Profit Center Accounting and Cost Center Accounting.
    Although the sub application in table T881 is PSM and not GLF. Why is this error situation succeeding?

    Eli,
    Thank you in advance, I've read the note and still one doubt arises:
    Having activated Funds Management, I have Totals Table defined as FAGLFLEXT and sub application = PSM.
    Regarding these features, are they correct to provide me information in the future with the following detail: Consolidation, Profit Center Accounting and Cost Center Accounting?
    Sorry for insisting, but I wasnu2019t clear with the note about this particular matter.
    You are being very helpful,
    Best regards
    Cardozo

  • In Funds Management-Assigned budget is more than the release

    Hi Experts,
    We have Funds Management active and in few cases the assigned budget is more than the released budget for a funds center and commitment item. We observed that the material consumption (stores requests) entries get posted even when there is no released budget.
    Can you suggest ways to control the posing of material consumption entries when there is no released budget in Funds management.
    With Regards
    ACR.Ruben

    hi
    Try there is a USER _EXIT for Material consulmption for the Movement type 261 GI to Production .
    Extension SAPLFMFA, component EXIT_SAPLFMFA_001
    through this you can stop the Material consumption additions to fundcenter through the commit ment item.
    Thanks & Regards
    Mala K Reddy

  • Error while Activating Activate Global Funds Management Functions (PSM-FM)

    Hi,
    I am getting the below error while activating Activate Global Funds Management Functions (PSM-FM) in Funds Management.
    Aktivierung des Haushaltsmanagements ist nicht erlaubt
    Message no. ZZ003
    Kindly help me in fix this issue....
    Thanks
    Kishore

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply. But can you clarify me why we need to delete the row Z_LEAVE in SE11 for FMISPS table. Because here ABAPER is objecting to do this as they feel there may be some impact if we delete this.
    Kindly clarify me
    Thanks
    Kishore

  • GL account linkage with activity group for AVC- Funds management

    Hi,
    I have activated (BCS) funds management in my system. My client wants that system will give error message for some expense GL accounts and for other expense GL accounts it will only give information message.
    For that i have created new activity group for AVC but i have no idea how we can link GL accounts with activity group for AVC.
    Request immediate help.
    Thanks in advance.
    Manisha

    Hi,
    The correct way to deal with this is not with activity groups, but with tolerance profiles. Create tolerance profiles with error and warning messages accordingly and then create a tolerance derivation strategy, which on the basis of commitment item, will derive the relevant profile.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Mass Write Off - When Funds Management is active

    Hi All,
    I am working for ISU project and  we have a business requirment to do Mass Write Off. We are not able to do it as Funds Management is active.
    We had  to activate Funds management as we need to send fund related information to Peoplesoft, which is the reporting engine for the client.
    We are  encountering this error:
    Write-off over several fiscal years
    Message no. FKKFMCHK038
    Diagnosis
    You are posting a document similar to a write-off that writes off documents from several fiscal years. This is not possible with the transaction used if Funds Management is active.
    If anyone can throw some light on how to slove this, it would grealy help me.
    Thanks,
    Lalitha

    Hi Lalitha,
    The reason can be a commitment item with a wrong financial transaction. Therefore please check
    the relevant bank clearing account and the assigned commitment item.
    The commitment item should have financial transaction 90 in transaction FMCIA.
    In the long text of SAP note 686383 you'll find more information regarding this topic. The point 3 under limitations is very
    important for the described situation.
    I believe this will help you.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Runtime Error due to activating Fund Management

    Hi,
    I had activated Funds Management in SAP. I started getting Run Time Errors. I deactivated the Fund Management. But still the Run Time Error is there. I am attaching the file for your reference.
    I enquired with the Basis consultant who is telling this is a Functional problem, hence I need to solve this. I checked all the configurations, but could not find the exact problem.
    Can anybody tell me how this can be resolved.
    Note: This error is showing in Quality Server. There was a copying from Production to Quality.

    In the error I see the statement before the dump comes is   PERFORM exit--entry_from_table                                                          | | 1039|        IN PROGRAM (-callback_report)     
    That sounds like an user exit from a table that is not there.
    You say you had a copy from production. It could be that a user exit which was not implemented yet in production and therefore not in the exit table. is now also not present anymore in your Q system after the copy. Were there any changes about to go to production ?
    Also in the dump I read the comment:
      | 1063|* version and guid are used by strategy -> further params for generated                     | | 1064|* routines. guid is only used for reference purposes and not returned at                    | | 1065|* the moment  
    That could possibly mean that this is a generated program. Maybe you need to regenerate it.
    I also see:  STEP--METHOD_DRULE
    That could mean that these have something to do with rules that have not been maintained.
    You could ask a programmer to debug the program and see where SAP tries to get the rules and exit information from (which table) .
    Maybe that give you a clue what is going wrong.
    If you have a table name start SM30 and click customizing. If it opens a customizing transaction then that is where you need to maintain entries.

  • Global Funds Management - Error on activation

    I am trying to activate Global Funds Management functions.  However, I notice a very strange situation.  After activating it, when I try to post a FI Document, system is saying "Enter a leading ledger".  I had already defined leading and non-leading ledgers in the New GL.  If I deactivate the Global Fund Management functions again, I am able to post the document and the same error message is not appearing.

    Hello,
    Please tell me about your system condition. Is your ecc 6.0 also implement Public Sector component, and the relevant consultant already activated public sector management component in SPRO? Usually de-activate leading ledger 0L cause by activated this component.
    It is the behavior system once Global PSM -FM activated it create new total table FMGLFLEXT, and customer free to use either FAGLEFLEXT or FMGLFLEXT.
    If you want to use/activate again 0L then you can programt via SE38. Run the program FMGL_CHANGE_APPL_IN_LEDGER.
    Leading ledger 0L will come back again.
    Also you can get more information on note 840783

  • Issue when activing Global Funds Management Function(PSM-FM)

    Hi Peers,
    I tried to active Global Funds Management Function(PSM-FM) in IMG. A message "Aktivierung des Haushaltsmanagements ist nicht erlaubt" poped up. And I also only have read access to “Active/Deactive Funds Management” but SU53 shows authorization check is ok.
    What should I do for next? Thanks
    Regards,
    Eunice

    Hi,
    I am facing the same issue regarding "Read Access Only" to the activation of Funds Management under Actual and Commitment Update/Integration.
    I've checked the component activation and found that
    1) ES-PS is activated under SPRO
    2) IS-PS is checked under BF11, but the checkbox status is greyed, so that it's impossible to change it.
    I've tried to delete the IS-PS entry and re-insert it...the action was successful but the issue remained...
    Any clues?
    Thanks

Maybe you are looking for