Funds Management - Online Payment Update

Hi -
I am trying to have payments updated in FM.
"I have used update profile 101 -Pmt Bud, Pmt basis, Posting date ( earlier I have used 102 then changed to 101). I have cheked the box for "" Payment Update online"" in settings for payment transfer.
We ahve New GL activate with FAGLFLEXT with document splitting.I made VOBELNR and KOBELNR as additional charcteristics for document splitting with clearing account 'zero'.
I have read in some treads that we have to make FMGLFLEXT totals table attached to leading ledger, but I have not see in any of the SAP help or SPRO texts that we have to do this way ?.
My Bank account GL is assigned to 90/1 commitment item and the Vendor GL is assigned to 60/3.
After all this Payments are not getting updated in FM. Do i have to do something at the time of payment with respect to account assignment ...
Currently working on ECC 6.0 Sand box with EA-PS lvl 11.
Thansk in Advance
Chris"
Edited by: Chris Farr on Feb 11, 2009 2:47 PM

My Problem is solved now, there were inconsistancies in my commiment item categories. My vendor GL was wrongly assigned to a commitment item with 40/3 instead of 60/3, thats why payments were not updated. Now I can see payments getting updated.
Settings required were -
1) Tick for Online Payment Update ( FM- Actual and commitment update - Integration - Define settings for online payment transfer)
2) The online payment update requires the use of the new general ledger and suitable Customizing for document splitting in Financial Accounting (new) -> General Ledger Accounting (new) -> Business Transactions -> Document Splitting. Here you can use the standard splitting procedure 0000000012 as a basis. You must also define the fields KNBELNR and VOBELNR as document splitting characteristics of the general ledger.
check this tread also - Funds Management - Online Payment Update
I have one more question   - I have a PO with multiple FM account assignments (e.g two items with Fund center1 and Fund center2) and the same is invoiced. When I do the partial/Full payment Payments are only getting updated in one FM assignement i.e Fund center1. I think the payment has to be split among the FM account assignments. Can spmebody  please clarify.
check this tread also
Thanks
Chris
Edited by: Chris Farr on Feb 16, 2009 10:41 AM
Edited by: Chris Farr on Feb 16, 2009 10:46 AM
Edited by: Chris Farr on Feb 16, 2009 10:48 AM

Similar Messages

  • Funds Management - Reconstruct payment data

    Hello,
    I have implement Funds Management with Multi-Year Budget Execution and update profile 00101 (posting date) and realize that my commitment item for vendor account was 40 and not 60 so I have some invoices that are not updated with the payment in FM. How can I reconstruct my data? I used the report RFFMRPFI but is not working as I expect. I still have teh invoice open in FM.
    Thank you,
    Angela Costa

    Hi Angela,
    There are only 2 ways to make a FI payment be a payment also in FM (value type 57) and it is not related to the financial transaction of the commitment item.
    1 - Run of the Payment Selection Program (report RFFMS200)
    SPRO -> Public Sector Management -> Funds Management Government -> Actual and Commitment Update/Integration -> Integration -> Define Settings for Payment Transfer
    Please check the documentation icon available in front of this line.
    2 - Payment Update Online
    You check if you are using payment update online in transaction OF29.
    It seems to be that you are not using Payment Update online otherwise the value type 57 would be generated automatically in FM table. Therefore, please run the report of item 1.
    I dont know in which release you are but from ECC600 on, customers are not allowed to use program RFFMS200 but only use the payment update online.
    Therefore, I will give you some additional information regarding Payment Update Online:
    CONSULTING NOTES
    ================
    882379  - FMPU_R: Recommendations for the online payment update
    435328  - Analysis programs for the payment update
    1234391 - Incorrect payment update in FM or in NewGL split information
    1030497 - SAP ERP 6.0: Public sector scenarios in new general ledger
    Please check carefully the notes. Since Release EA-PS 6.00, only the online payment update in Funds Management using the new general ledger with document splitting is supported. Therefore, you must have NewGl with document splitting. You will find additional information in the PDF attached and also in the notes mentioned above.
    I hope this helps.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Down payment in fund management

    Hi,
    When i am posting a down payment in reference to purchase order, budget is carried back by system automatically which was committed at the time of creation of Purchase Order. It may lead to actual procurement exceeding the budget as budget is reduces.
    For example:
    Purchase Order created - 100 USD (Budget is committed by 100 USD)
    Down payment created against PO - 100 USD (Budget commited by purchase order is carried back automatically)
    It means another PO can be created for for 100 USD till the time down payment is not cleared.
    Can anybody guide me to stop reversal of budget commitment at down payment.
    Further, standard update profile 350 is used where down payment & down payment request are marked as 'Statistical Update'. SAP version is ECC 604.
    Thanks
    Manish

    Hi Mar,
    I had seen this SAP note before posting thread.
    I have some doubts in regard to implementing above note which are as follows:
    1. In update profile Down payment request & Down payment is marked for statistical update then why it is impacting funds
    2. SAP Note says that it is a modification & SAP will withdraw support after implementation of note. What are the changes take place once note is implemented:
          a. Whether I would not be able to make down payment against purchase order line item?
          b. If i can not make payment then this note is of no use as i want to track down payment against purchase order.
          c. If i can make the down payment against purchase order, will it not impact purchase order history?
                                                                                    OR
          d. this change will only impact fund management & down payment document will not impact fund management
    Thanks

  • Payment update in FM

    Hi,
    I am on ECC 6.0, EHP4 (Nel GL activated) and implmenting the BCS part of FM. I am right now in testing phase and found that payments are not getting updated in table FMIFIIT. There is a field called "Payment document no", but in that field, invoice document no is getting updated.
    I searched on sdn and found miltiple threads advising for online payment update. In few of threads  pdf file "online payment update.pdf" is referred, but I cannot get that file when I tried to navigate through the link given in the thread.
    Can anyone please guide me on steps about the payment update in FM?
    Regards
    Shailesh

    Hi,
    I have gone through the note related to online payment updates note 1695556, 1564893, 400924, 882379.
    We are already implemented new gl in 2009 with document splitting activated. In this scenario as it is suggested, we will have to realign out current document splitting configuration as well, which is a tough task. Also, there are many restrictions which will follow once I activate the online payment update for FM
    My question is, if I do not update the payments in funds mangement, what will I loose? Is it utmost necessary for me to update the payment documents in FM?
    Please advise
    Shailesh

  • Idoc Funds Management Update

    Hi,
    We are using IS-U and updating separate ECC instance through IDOC FIDCCP01. The FM (Funds Management) assignment i.e. Fund, Fund Center and Commitment Item are being correctly updated, however, there is no budget check. The report FMAVCR01 also does not reflect the IDoc posting.
    There is no Funds Management or Controlling document, only FI document is being created.
    We need to activate budget availability check on IDoc posting.
    Please advice.
    Thanks and regards,
    Achal

    Hello,
    Can you please review your settings according to the attachment? (zip file). this error sometimes happens if settings for document splitting and payments without reference are not ok.
    Please let us know if it helps
    regards
    Mar
    If you can't open the file, please try this link:
    [https://websmp107.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700007290972005E]
    sorry for the trouble with the attachment
    regards
    Mar
    Edited by: Mar Novalbos on Jul 23, 2009 4:50 PM
    Edited by: Mar Novalbos on Jul 23, 2009 4:55 PM

  • System error in Funds Management update

    Dear you,
    Have anyone seen the following when updating FM from FI document:
    "System error:Funds management update (FMRI, CHECK_WE_RE)"
    Any ideas what to do?
    Thanks
    Sonja

    Hi there,
    The update problem occurs both if we try to post with FB50L or if I try to make a transfer of FI postings in FM. This all happens in the new installation where we plan to use new GL and FM.
    This note you gave did not ring a bell for me
    The error message is FI057. But we have not yet found a suitable note.
    Therefore any ideas are still welcomed.

  • Error- funds managment update

    when i go to va02 and want to short close the order line item, i am getting the following error. 
    System error: Funds management update (DOUBLE KEY,FM_OPEN_ITEM_POST)
                                                                                    kindly let me know how to solve this error please.
    regards
    sathya

    Your getting 2 Keys for FM FM_OPEN_ITEM_POST.
    Check following link for understanding
    No commitment item entered in item
    Re: Error with Commitment Update
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

  • Approvals for online tax form (w4) and manage payroll payments in SSHR

    Can someone throw ideas how to build the approvals in workflow?
    Oracle did not provide approvals for both the functions W4 and Manage payroll payments(change/modify payment methods)

    Can somebody Please help with the request?
    Edited by: user4373967 on Mar 2, 2009 4:56 PM

  • Budget Update In Funds Management

    Hi,
    I have configure FM and posted budget through FMBB. after releasing the budget i am still unable to see it as consumable budget in Budget consumption report it shows m all the budget amount in available budget column. further when i post an invoice in FI through FB60 fund management document alse get posted but again i am unable to see it in budget consumption report. please help me out here...
    Regards,

    Its been resolved..
    For budget not being available for consumption after being posted through FMBB th issue was in my AVC profile. and for the second part where budget was not consumed after invoice being posted through FB60 the issue was in my fiscal yeas variant year shift. the posting was taking plane in the wrong fiscal yeas hence consuming budget for that particular fiscal year and not of the year i intended to post to. Thank you so much fpr approving my query
    Regards,

  • CJ20N NWA update funds management button

    Hello
    In cj20n im trying to  automate the NWA assignments in the funds management to the NWA. Is there a way to have this process automated.
    thanks
    MAtt

    Hi Matt,
    I assume that automate means you would like to derive the funds, funds center, funded program, grant from the network activity. No need to input these values in the network activity.
    For this you need to configure derivation rule/assignment in the transaction FMDERIVE based on the requirements from your customer business.  Hope I answer your question. Please let me know if I am not.
    Regards
    Srinivasan Desingh

  • Item 010 Fund Center/Commit Payment Budget Exceeded (FM)

    Hi Expertise,
    Our user executing FMJ2 transaction to carry forward purchase requisition (PR) / Purchase Order (PO) from 2014 to 2015 (April to March) by that time getting the below error message, but budgets are available for 2015.
    Item 010 Fund Center/Commit Payment Budget Exceeded
    Another user also facing the similar issue while create new PR in the current FY-2015 with different commitment item & fund center, still getting the same error, but budgets are available for 2015.
    Kindly share your views and ideas, its urgent.
    Thanks,
    Jammy

    Hi Jammy,
    Please check the following hints about this matter:
    1) To be on the safe side, please run report RFFMRC04 in test mode, to see if there are differences between the line items and totals table.
    If errors arise, please run it in update mode, whithout other budgeting/posting activities occurring at the same time (otherwise you may encounter differences). Then, please reconstruct the AVC totals (FMBV for Former budgeting, FMAVCREINIT for BCS).
    2) Reassignment during fiscal year change also uses the Derivation strategy for reassignment (transaction FMYC). Please verify if you have defined in FMYC a different FM account assignment (funds center and commitmente item) than the one that you are expecting.
    I am not sure if you have Former Budgeting or BCS, therefore consider also the following:
    3) IF you are using Former Budgeting, I guess you are getting BP629. Please check report BPINDAN2_NEW and  if the 'Assigned budget' is same as the 'Commitments/actuals' the values are ok and budget is missing. If the values are different, you must run report BPINDX03 (FMBV) first to correct it.
    4) IF you are using BCS, I guess you are getting FMAVC* message. For this, use transaction FMAVCR01 to verify your budget consumption and make sure that the budget was updated for payment budget not commitment budget (as per the error message that you are receiving).
    5) Please check how this UOM (unit of measure) is defined in transaction CUNI.
    In this transaction, you can set the Value-based commitment indicator.
    This indicator controls whether commitments for the chosen unit of measure are
    recorded on a quantity basis or a value basis. If the indicator is not set, the
    commitments are managed on a quantity basis. If you set the indicator they are
    managed on a value basis.
    For value-based updates, the reduction of purchase order commitments occurs
    with the maximum of goods receipt and/or invoice value. For
    quantity-based commitments, the reduction of purchase order commitments occurs
    with the maximum of goods receipt and/or invoice quantity.
    Example:
    You create a purchase order with the quantity of 1000 at the price of 10.
    You post a goods receipt related to this PO with the quantity of 500 at the
    price of 9.
    For value-based updates, an amount of 4,500 is updated.
    For quantity-based updates, an amount of  5,000 is updated.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards, Vanessa.

  • |Funds Management - relating to PR/PO

    I am getting another error in Funds Management:
    Posting date must be used for update of value type 000100 update profile 50
    Message no. FI_E008
    Diagnosis
    FM areas with assignment to the update profile must have all their value types defined as 'posting date' on the ledger level when activating to period-based encumbrance tracking (PBET) on the ledger level.
    Procedure
    Find all the FM areas using the update profile in transaction 'OF37'.
    Use transaction OF36 to ensure that all value types in the FM area(s) are using 'posting date' for the ledger that is being activated to PBET.

    Hi,
    It's what the system says. You have to ensure, that you don't overwrite profile 0100 in OF36 with other date, than posting date.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Funds Management cut over of Open PR and PO

    Hi,
    In case of cutover, we are using following link to update FM account assignment in open PR/PO.
    SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Select Documents
    and
    SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Convert Worklist
    1) But in this case, for open PO of which GR is not done FMRP_RW_BUDCON report is not updated after doing above mentioned process. when I make GR, commitment get updated in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report. This does not show actual status of budget consumption as budget consumption is shown at the time of GR only.
    2) If GR is already done for PO and after doing above mentioned process, if GR get reversed then Negetive commitment shows in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report and after deletion of that respected PO, commitment of PO gets zero. But negetive GR commitment remains open which leads to wrong status of budget consumption. e.g. GR of Rs 5000 is reversed. Then report shows two documents as -5000 for GR reversed and 5000 for PO commitment getting open. IF I reversed this PO then PO commitment of 5000 become zero. but GR reversing amount -5000 still remains open. So it shows less consumption of budget by Rs.5000.
    Do I am missing any process. Suggest.

    Hi,
    Firstly, after you convert the open commitments, you'll need to run FMAVCREINIT to reconstruct AVC. FMRP_RW_BUDCON will then reflect the converted commitments.
    Secondly, based on your posting, it seems that you do not want PO commitments (VT 51) to be counted as budget consumption. You can achieve this in the ledger 9H configuration:
    Public sector management > Funds management government > BCS > Availability control > Settings for availability control ledger > Define filter settings for commitment/actual values. You will want to exclude both value type 50 and 51 from ledger 9H. After you change the setting, you will need to run FMAVCREINIT again.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Ming

  • Status of PO becomes F in fund management

    Hi,
    recently we have upgrade SAP from ECC6 to EHP4 and found some of the PO's Status becomes F in fund management, so we are not able to make service entry sheet and payment as system asking for further budget though actually POs value has not reduced fully.
    Plz help to remove the status F from FM so that it can be able to make payment.
    P K Sahoo

    Hi, try to reconstract PO(I don't remember tcode, but you can find it in spro like M*4N)

  • PSM-FM-Reversal of funds management document after change in acc.assignment

    Good day we recently went live with a component of Funds Management i.e. Availability Control on Cost centers and cost elements. We update BCS with the plan values and actual/commitment items in Finance/CO. We do our planning in CO.
    The solution is working reasonably well but we have encountered a problem for which we are unable to find a solution. The problem is best illustrated with an example;
    1. Create purchase requisition with Account Assignment Category "K" = Cost Center with transaction ME51N
    2. Account assignment = cost center and cost element. A funds management document is created upon saving of the transaction.
    3. Purchase Req. is released with a release strategy (transaction ME54N)
    4. After purchase requisition release the account assignment for the cost element is changed by the user. This occurs sometimes during the execution of the business process.
    5. When a purchase order is created with reference to this purchase requisition with transaction ME59N  the system references the original funds management document which means when the account assignment was changed the funds management document was not reversed and a new funds management document created for the changed account assignment.
    6. The BUDCON report transaction FMRP_RW_BUDCON thus displays the commitment under the incorrect commitment item as the change in account assignment is not reflected in Funds Management. We have a one to one relationship between cost elements/commitment items and cost centers/funds centers as per the derivation strategy.
    My question is;
    Is this normal standard SAP standard behavior or are we missing some configuration that will enable the creation of a new funds management document and if so where do we configure such?  I must mention our solution is completely SAP standard. 
    Thank you in advance.
    Best Regards
    Mike Olwagen
    Manager SAP Solution Support
    City Power (JHB) (Pty) Ltd

    Hi Mike, nice to meet you.
    I think u should do an entire test with TRACE on, and u will find the problem, and how to fix it (at FMDERIVE of course).
    First: Have a look at note [666322|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/666322], go to FMDERIVE and turn ON the trace.
    Then, run all the process ... from ME51N to the end...
    I agree with Eli, u must allow overwriting of existing values at FMDERIVE rule...
    Regards,
    Osvaldo.

Maybe you are looking for