Funds management Retraction from SEM to R/3

Hi Experts,
Can any one suggest the retraction process for FUNDS MANAGEMENT From SEM to R/3 (I heard that it requres ABAP programme).
Thanks and regards
Prasad

Sorry, I missed to add a my observation that when execute the Planning function with some values in selection of either CRM element or WBS element, it is running fine. However when both are left balnk in the selections it is giving me this error. To handle this case, do we need any thing to transfer characteristics with unassigned values '#' ?
Cheers,
Ramz

Similar Messages

Funds Management - Reimbursement from Customers

Hi,
The Scenario is that the company will do some expenses which are reimbursable by the customer. i.e. expenses on behalf of customer. For e.g. Travel of employee is reimbursed by the Customer, so at that time Budget should be reduced, but when the customer reimburses that amount to the company budget should be increased. In SD we will be using dummy fund centers.
How Can I map this scenario in FM.
Thanks & Regards,
Jyoti

Hi,
You can implement RIB (Revenue increasing budget) scenario, where the accepted revenue could increase the budget for expenses lines. You can read more here:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/77/bb62c092036b408ee52c0e85b9d4ee/frameset.htm
Regards,
Eli

Fund managment period change

How to change fund managment period from existing (APRIL TO MARCH) TO OCT TO SEPTEMBER.
WE ARE TRYING TO CHANGE THAT USING
public cector mgmt
fund mgmnt govt
basic setting
fiscal year setting
define fiscal year setting
there we have v3 as april to march and
v9 as oct to sept
originally we had assigned v3 to Financial year and to fund mgmt period both.
but now we want to assign v9 to fund mgmt period.
But system is not allowing us to do that. How can we achive it and what are the reasons for errors.

Hi,
If you already post to FM then you can't change the FY variant. The only way I see is:
A) Delete all posting.
B) Change the setting
C) Reload by "subsequent" transactions.
In case you direct post to FM (E.G budget) you have to reenter. Alternativerly, if you have mass data you entered, write a small program that download the line items and reload after the changes (you can use CATT or ECATT to load the flat file you create).
Hope this help you.
Benni

BPC Retraction for Funds Management

hi guys,
is there any FM or programs that we can use to retract data from BPC back to ECC6 for Funds Management module

In my project, customer has same requirement. We retracted BPC data to FM module by:
Option1 - FMCYCOPI_BW is a standard function, but issue: it can't provide detail information if there's error happened.
(1) Download BPC data to a BW Cube. (This step is not mandatory)
(2) in FM, use TCODE FMCYCOPI_BW to extract BW query (on that Cube) and generate FM documents. // you need to do some configure in SPRO FM.
Option2 - you can capture error while creating FM documents.
Write ABAP codes to retract BPC data and generate FM Documents.

Funds management cube getting data from 4 ods, data not seen in cube

Hello all,
I am working on funds management cubes (0PU_C02 and 0PU_C03). These two cubes get data from like 7 or 8 ODS. Can someone tell me which are the ODS which feed to respective cubes. I have the mappings done but i am getting very confused.
In the ods 0PU_O44 there is RLDNR for Ledger and I can see that data in ODS but when i run load to cube I dont see the ledger data (its direct mapping there are no routines or rules).
Is there any sequence with wihic we have to load the data?
Thanks
Message was edited by: Raj M

Hi Raj,
I was going thru the forums who has knowledge in Public sector when i came accross ur forum.Can i get your email id..i have some questions to ask regarding student administration.
thanks.

Fund Management - Issues in Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6

Hello,
We are upgrading SAP Application for a client who is on 4.6C to ECC6. The client is currently using Funds Management in 4.6C. With ECC6 I understand that this functionality is moved into Public Sector and is available only on activation of IS-PS Extension Set.
The question I have is that does this activation impact any other business processes or is just a technical activation.
What I mean is that if I activate this extension set does the system start doing things differently and needs specific data related to Public Sector which the business users will be required to be entered while doing transactions OR the activation will not impact business processes as such and would work as earlier with Funds management active. (except where there was a change in the functionality between 4.6C to ECC6)
I would like to know the risks, if any involved in upgrading Funds Management from 4.6C to ECC6.
Please reply and let me know any question to get more clarity on the issue.
Best Regards
Kuldeep

Hi Kuldeep,
There are several main issues that have to be addresses when upgrading from 4.6 to ECC6. The main ones are:
1 - Derivations. The object are no longer connected through tables or master data entries (you may have a table that links Cost Centers to Funds Centers for example). These assignments are now maintained through a flexible derivation tool. These derivation rules have to be maintaind, or the posting addresses will have no FM values and you will not be able to post any documents.
2 - Inventory purchases. The inventory purchases scenarios are no longer maintained through the customization (you can no longer choose one of the 4 inventory scenarios, and there's no warehouse Funds Center). These are all maintained through derivations.
3 - BCS. There's a new budgeting and AVC tool called "Budget Control System" (BCS). You can either activate it, or keep working with the old budgeting (called "former" in the customization). The new BCS affords flexibility in budgeting and AVC, including several AVC ledgers.
More data regarding migrations can be found in documentation. If you want, I can send you the PDF document.
Best regards,
Shahaf Yaari
[email protected]

CASH FLOW REPORT FROM FUNDS MANAGEMENT

Hi All
I am in the mid of BW implementation for FI and FM reports.
As part of this i have to create CASH FLOW report..
Currently the user using a SAP report from , Funds Management, FMEM which points to the structure IFMEISB , Cash Budget Management.
Is there any datasource is available in FM to access this structure?
Otherwise any body knows what are tables in FM has to be extracted for this puropes..
Regards
Mano

Hi
You can check the Financials business contect.
Funds management
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/71/d3143cb1b8be00e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Have a look at these data sources:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/b5/12163c240a9440e10000000a114084/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/d3/29ae399c1a6651e10000000a114084/content.htm
Data sources for funds management
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw33/helpdata/en/ba/c8ad3928a07c50e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Regards
Naveen
PS: Assigning point to the helpful answers is the way of saying thanks in SDN

Migration Funds Management from 4.7 to ECC.6.0

Hi,
The company is migrating the system from v. 4.7 to ECC 6.0. We have the module FM (Funds Management), but we don't know if this module is still active in ECC 6.0.
Do you have any information about this? And any documentation to do this migration?
Thanks in advance
Lluisa

Hi Lluisa,
See note[669764|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/669764]:
as of release R/3 enterprise, Funds Management is delivered as an add-on, i.e. EA-PS.
Suggest to check all the release notes for PSM including the ones for EA-PS 110,200,500 and 600
https://websmp206.sap-ag.de/releasenotes
As you are an Spanish Public Sector customer, I am also including the link to the available documentation, but if you did not have IS-PS nor ISPSe before, I think most of the specific upgrade tools will not be relevant for you. No matter, just have a look for your information:
https://websmp201.sap-ag.de/sectorpublico
Servicios para Sector Público España -> ISPSe Contabilidad Presupuestaria > ISPSe Support Packages > EAPSe600
And, in EA-PS enhancement package 4, there are additional functions for Spanish customers:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/42/fbded750e61febe10000000a422035/frameset.htm
> Business Functions in SAP ERP -> Enterprise Business Functions -> Accounting>Public Sector Management --> Country-Specific Business Functions -->FI-FM Localization Topics for the Spanish Public Sector
Maybe this is too much information for now..;)
Kind regards
Mar

Funds Management-Derive Fund centre from Cost Centre

Dear Guru
In funds management -Derive Fund centre from Cost Centre" i used to have 8000 entries till yesterday. So there were 8000 combinations of fund center with cost center.
Somehow I can only see 80 today. Somebody might have deleted those.
Is there any change log availble to see who deleted and when?
Archit

Hi,
I see... Deletion is not logged there, I'm afraid; only modifications on existing entries. Unless, you have specifically defined log status for the relevant FM table, which I doubt. I believe, no one would delete 8000 records just for laugh. Most probable, the entries were deleted with a transport request.
One more reason to follow my advice and maintain the link in a different manner.
Regards,
Eli

Generating call object from Maintenance order with Fund management

Dear All,
we have activated the funds management and assigned the fund center as Mandatory for creation of order.
But while using the order type in maintenance plan during scheduling ,system is not releasing the call stating incomplete account assingnment ,since there is no provision to specify the Fund center in maintenance plan.
Any work around
regards
thyagarajan
Edited by: thyagarajan krishnamurthy on Oct 15, 2009 8:11 PM

Hi
Thanks for your response .
In my client we have activated the customer at save event to check the Fund center and settlement receiver to be same.Hence while saving the order system will check prompt an error if it was different.
I think due to the above exit ,system is not able to release the call object.
We cannot able to cancel the exit also.
Any clue?
regards
thyagarajan

System error in Funds Management update

Dear you,
Have anyone seen the following when updating FM from FI document:
"System error:Funds management update (FMRI, CHECK_WE_RE)"
Any ideas what to do?
Thanks
Sonja

Hi there,
The update problem occurs both if we try to post with FB50L or if I try to make a transfer of FI postings in FM. This all happens in the new installation where we plan to use new GL and FM.
This note you gave did not ring a bell for me
The error message is FI057. But we have not yet found a suitable note.
Therefore any ideas are still welcomed.

Funds Management cut over of Open PR and PO

Hi,
In case of cutover, we are using following link to update FM account assignment in open PR/PO.
SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Select Documents
and
SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Convert Worklist
1) But in this case, for open PO of which GR is not done FMRP_RW_BUDCON report is not updated after doing above mentioned process. when I make GR, commitment get updated in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report. This does not show actual status of budget consumption as budget consumption is shown at the time of GR only.
2) If GR is already done for PO and after doing above mentioned process, if GR get reversed then Negetive commitment shows in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report and after deletion of that respected PO, commitment of PO gets zero. But negetive GR commitment remains open which leads to wrong status of budget consumption. e.g. GR of Rs 5000 is reversed. Then report shows two documents as -5000 for GR reversed and 5000 for PO commitment getting open. IF I reversed this PO then PO commitment of 5000 become zero. but GR reversing amount -5000 still remains open. So it shows less consumption of budget by Rs.5000.
Do I am missing any process. Suggest.

Hi,
Firstly, after you convert the open commitments, you'll need to run FMAVCREINIT to reconstruct AVC. FMRP_RW_BUDCON will then reflect the converted commitments.
Secondly, based on your posting, it seems that you do not want PO commitments (VT 51) to be counted as budget consumption. You can achieve this in the ledger 9H configuration:
Public sector management > Funds management government > BCS > Availability control > Settings for availability control ledger > Define filter settings for commitment/actual values. You will want to exclude both value type 50 and 51 from ledger 9H. After you change the setting, you will need to run FMAVCREINIT again.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ming

Error while settlement of WBS - Funds Management

Hi,
We have maintain derivation rule as - WBS to Fund Center. This Fund center is DUMMY because we need not want to control WBS through Funds Management.
There is always one Cost center in each WBS. while settling this WBS we are getting error as -
Asset ABC 000127000000 0000: no subnumber with FM assignment DUMMY / /
Message no. AW851
ABC - Company code
000127000000 - asset number
DUMMY - Fund center
suggest.

alex ice wrote:
Hi, 1 change FC in AS02 to dummy if it applicable.
> 2 Check note 618269 it applicable.
> 3 remove FC from asset master data
Hi Alex, how are u!?
I've got the same issue than Harsh Vaidya in my system ...
Ive already read this notes: [618269|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/618269] (no apply to me, because Joint Venture Accounting isn't active), [844262|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/844262], [1473357|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1473357], [446029|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/446029] and [440396|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/440396]
All very interesting notes :P
But... I couldn't find the solution
I try to TRACE from FMDERIVE too, but when I go to KO88, FMDERIVE's trace doesn't track anything.
Any help to throw some more light on this thread, would be very useful.
Thanks a lot!
Regards from Argentine.

Status of PO becomes F in fund management

Hi,
recently we have upgrade SAP from ECC6 to EHP4 and found some of the PO's Status becomes F in fund management, so we are not able to make service entry sheet and payment as system asking for further budget though actually POs value has not reduced fully.
Plz help to remove the status F from FM so that it can be able to make payment.
P K Sahoo

Hi, try to reconstract PO(I don't remember tcode, but you can find it in spro like M*4N)

PSM-FM-Reversal of funds management document after change in acc.assignment

Good day we recently went live with a component of Funds Management i.e. Availability Control on Cost centers and cost elements. We update BCS with the plan values and actual/commitment items in Finance/CO. We do our planning in CO.
The solution is working reasonably well but we have encountered a problem for which we are unable to find a solution. The problem is best illustrated with an example;
1. Create purchase requisition with Account Assignment Category "K" = Cost Center with transaction ME51N
2. Account assignment = cost center and cost element. A funds management document is created upon saving of the transaction.
3. Purchase Req. is released with a release strategy (transaction ME54N)
4. After purchase requisition release the account assignment for the cost element is changed by the user. This occurs sometimes during the execution of the business process.
5. When a purchase order is created with reference to this purchase requisition with transaction ME59N the system references the original funds management document which means when the account assignment was changed the funds management document was not reversed and a new funds management document created for the changed account assignment.
6. The BUDCON report transaction FMRP_RW_BUDCON thus displays the commitment under the incorrect commitment item as the change in account assignment is not reflected in Funds Management. We have a one to one relationship between cost elements/commitment items and cost centers/funds centers as per the derivation strategy.
My question is;
Is this normal standard SAP standard behavior or are we missing some configuration that will enable the creation of a new funds management document and if so where do we configure such? I must mention our solution is completely SAP standard.
Thank you in advance.
Best Regards
Mike Olwagen
Manager SAP Solution Support
City Power (JHB) (Pty) Ltd

Hi Mike, nice to meet you.
I think u should do an entire test with TRACE on, and u will find the problem, and how to fix it (at FMDERIVE of course).
First: Have a look at note [666322|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/666322], go to FMDERIVE and turn ON the trace.
Then, run all the process ... from ME51N to the end...
I agree with Eli, u must allow overwriting of existing values at FMDERIVE rule...
Regards,
Osvaldo.

Funds management Retraction from SEM to R/3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for