Funds Management - Statistical Posting

Hello,
I have implemented FM and I realize that some of the payment updated in FM are statistical posting`s incorrectly. Can I reverse the statistical postings?
Thank you,
Angela Costa

Hi,
This is not possible in standard procedure. You have to delete transactional data, change the master data of the commitment (or other parameter which made the posting statistical, i.e. special definition of update profile for value type) and then reconstruct the FM data.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

  • Funds Management - Subsequent Posting

    hi gurus
    We live Funds Management Module in mid of the fiscal year and  upload full budget for the fiscal year. Now we want to run subsequent posting for the previous months to reconcile the FM with other module. Can any body suggest the guid line and steps in this regard ?
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Muhammad Shahid

    Hi Eli
    I already impliment a note, but i have still facing problem i.e when i run a subsequent posting it does not check the available budget, but post the document.
    Example:
    - Balance in a Commitment item ABC is 15000
    - I run subsequent posting on Commitment Item ABC of amount 16000 which is greater than available budget.
    - After subsequent posting system show this 16000 amount in actual column and -1000 in available budget column
    - still system allow me to post the vendor invoice in commitment item ABC of amount 15000 this mean that systemis not checking available budget.
    is this a system standard or a bug.
    please Guide
    Regards
    Shahid

  • PSM - Funds Management - Subsequent Posting (transaction FMB0)

    Good day to all forumites. I am currently implementing Funds Management at our company (City Power Johannesburg South Africa) an electricity utility. The aim of implementing FM is to activate active availibility control (AVC) for cost center/cost element expenditure. We use cost element/center planning for budgeting purposes and intend to remain so for the future. We are on ECC6 and Funds Management has also been upgraded to the latest version.
    I have made the configuration settings as I think best including a full derivation strategy for cost elements/centers to commitment items/funds centers on a one-to-one basis i.e. for every cost element/center combination there is a corresponding entry in table FMFMOACP91000001. This table is created as resut of creating the derivation steps with transactions FMDERIVER.
    I have sucessfully transferred all CO Plan Data with transaction FMCYCOPI_CO form CO Planning to FM. My problem arises with the transfer of actual CO postings from CO to FM using transaction FMB0 (subsequent posting). When running a test sample of previously posted documents (in CO)  I get error messages which refer to a funds center required in the derivation strategy. The error message isn't very clear to me as I have as stated created a derivation strategy. I am not sure if for e.g. if there is a G/L account as offsetting account in the CO posting document it creates the error message. I have created an additional step in the derivation strategy to link all our gl accounts to one commitment item but this also does not seem to fix the problem.
    During the implementaion there have been several instances where notes had to be applied. This was as result of error messages I had encountered  during the initial testing after the base configuration had been completed. I am not sure if there could be a program error.
    I would appreciate any suggestions/advice on fixing the posting problem.
    Best Regards
    Mike Olwagen
    FICO Functional Analyst
    City Power JHB

    Hi Eli thank you very much for your help. By activating the trace I have removed half of my error messages. Most of the error messages relate to secondary cost elements which I have assigned per cost center to a generic commitment item and funds center i.e. many to one as suggested in the SAP Help documentation. What now remains is that the second line of a document for e.g. of an entry where an order for e.g. PM Order is referenced as object in the document line. I tried creating a second derivation step with the cost element and PM order field as source fields and a common funds center and commitment item as destination fields. The pm number range is used as the source field range as the numbers are too many for me to make a field entry with each individual pm order number. The error as described above however remains. I am not sure if I am creating the second derivation step incorrectly as it says on the screen the steps have to be in logical ord
    Can you perhaps suggest a way forward in terms of a derivation step whereby the system would recognise an order and derive the generic destination field(s) as explained above.
    Regards
    Mike Olwagen

  • Funds Management - Budget Posting

    Hi experts,
    I set up a fund management scenario with SAP CRM 6.0, then I'm trying to test it on WEB UI but I'm facing an issue which I'm not able to solve.
    The issue regards the Budget Posting functionality, specifically everytime I try to transfer budget from one fund to another the system gives me the following error: "Budget Consumption is 100.00 percent of total available budget (check level FU_FND)".
    In the error details the sistem tell me that the budget consumption/total available budget ratio is over the defined tolerance limits. Please adjust your posting amounts.
    Of course I tried to do it with the lowest amount but it doesn't work.
    Then, I guess I did a mistake during the configuration.
    Anyone who can help me working this problem out?
    Thanks a lot!
    Regards

    Hi Gabriele,
    the msg is raised as per the availability control set up - please check the following customizing:
    Customer Relationship Management
    Funds Management
    Availability Control (AVC)
    There please check the AVC profile assigned and the tolerance profiles.
    best regards,
    johannes

  • Statistical Posting for PS settlement in Funds Management ECC 6.0

    Hi people
    Previously in 4.6C, WBS settlement (CJ88) will result in statistical posting in Funds Mgmt.
    But now after upgrade to ECC 6.0, it is now considered as actual posting.
    I know there is setting under FMCIA where you can set certain commitment item to be a statistical commitment item but we don't want to do that since the commitment is being used for other situation where we do want it to be an actual posting.
    Anybody know how to solve this.
    thank you very much
    irwan

    Hi,
    You can manage it easily via FMDERIVE functionalities. Define a rule, where depending on busniess transaction (KOAO), the derived commitment item will be a statistical one (the other one, from what you use for regular postings).
    Regards,
    Eli

  • BAPI_0036_CREATE does not post budget to Funds Management

    Hi,
    We are using BAPI_0036_CREATE to create budget for a grant and posting to FM. It is creating a document in GM in  'unreleased' status, but not posting to Funds Management.
    We are passing FM data in the function module, but for some reason its not posting to FM. The Grant doc type is 'Unreleased' and is in Award phase.
    Does anyone know how to create budget document in released status and posting to FM.
    Thanks.

    Hi Rob,
    This budget is related to Grants. First we are creating budget for Grant, and then release it to FM, where the budget will be created in FM. The release part is not working.. hence it is not creating budget in FM.
    Thanks.

  • Down payment in fund management

    Hi,
    When i am posting a down payment in reference to purchase order, budget is carried back by system automatically which was committed at the time of creation of Purchase Order. It may lead to actual procurement exceeding the budget as budget is reduces.
    For example:
    Purchase Order created - 100 USD (Budget is committed by 100 USD)
    Down payment created against PO - 100 USD (Budget commited by purchase order is carried back automatically)
    It means another PO can be created for for 100 USD till the time down payment is not cleared.
    Can anybody guide me to stop reversal of budget commitment at down payment.
    Further, standard update profile 350 is used where down payment & down payment request are marked as 'Statistical Update'. SAP version is ECC 604.
    Thanks
    Manish

    Hi Mar,
    I had seen this SAP note before posting thread.
    I have some doubts in regard to implementing above note which are as follows:
    1. In update profile Down payment request & Down payment is marked for statistical update then why it is impacting funds
    2. SAP Note says that it is a modification & SAP will withdraw support after implementation of note. What are the changes take place once note is implemented:
          a. Whether I would not be able to make down payment against purchase order line item?
          b. If i can not make payment then this note is of no use as i want to track down payment against purchase order.
          c. If i can make the down payment against purchase order, will it not impact purchase order history?
                                                                                    OR
          d. this change will only impact fund management & down payment document will not impact fund management
    Thanks

  • System error in Funds Management update

    Dear you,
    Have anyone seen the following when updating FM from FI document:
    "System error:Funds management update (FMRI, CHECK_WE_RE)"
    Any ideas what to do?
    Thanks
    Sonja

    Hi there,
    The update problem occurs both if we try to post with FB50L or if I try to make a transfer of FI postings in FM. This all happens in the new installation where we plan to use new GL and FM.
    This note you gave did not ring a bell for me
    The error message is FI057. But we have not yet found a suitable note.
    Therefore any ideas are still welcomed.

  • |Funds Management - relating to PR/PO

    I am getting another error in Funds Management:
    Posting date must be used for update of value type 000100 update profile 50
    Message no. FI_E008
    Diagnosis
    FM areas with assignment to the update profile must have all their value types defined as 'posting date' on the ledger level when activating to period-based encumbrance tracking (PBET) on the ledger level.
    Procedure
    Find all the FM areas using the update profile in transaction 'OF37'.
    Use transaction OF36 to ensure that all value types in the FM area(s) are using 'posting date' for the ledger that is being activated to PBET.

    Hi,
    It's what the system says. You have to ensure, that you don't overwrite profile 0100 in OF36 with other date, than posting date.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Funds Management cut over of Open PR and PO

    Hi,
    In case of cutover, we are using following link to update FM account assignment in open PR/PO.
    SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Select Documents
    and
    SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Convert Worklist
    1) But in this case, for open PO of which GR is not done FMRP_RW_BUDCON report is not updated after doing above mentioned process. when I make GR, commitment get updated in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report. This does not show actual status of budget consumption as budget consumption is shown at the time of GR only.
    2) If GR is already done for PO and after doing above mentioned process, if GR get reversed then Negetive commitment shows in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report and after deletion of that respected PO, commitment of PO gets zero. But negetive GR commitment remains open which leads to wrong status of budget consumption. e.g. GR of Rs 5000 is reversed. Then report shows two documents as -5000 for GR reversed and 5000 for PO commitment getting open. IF I reversed this PO then PO commitment of 5000 become zero. but GR reversing amount -5000 still remains open. So it shows less consumption of budget by Rs.5000.
    Do I am missing any process. Suggest.

    Hi,
    Firstly, after you convert the open commitments, you'll need to run FMAVCREINIT to reconstruct AVC. FMRP_RW_BUDCON will then reflect the converted commitments.
    Secondly, based on your posting, it seems that you do not want PO commitments (VT 51) to be counted as budget consumption. You can achieve this in the ledger 9H configuration:
    Public sector management > Funds management government > BCS > Availability control > Settings for availability control ledger > Define filter settings for commitment/actual values. You will want to exclude both value type 50 and 51 from ledger 9H. After you change the setting, you will need to run FMAVCREINIT again.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Ming

  • How to release the budget in SAP Funds Management

    Hi
    How to release the budget in SAP Funds Management. Please let me know the proceedure and the transaction code
    Tks

    Hi,
    The answer depends on if you are using Former Budgeting or BCS.
    1) If you are using Former Budgeting:
    a. You should use transaction FR51 to enter Release or FR55 to distribute it.
    2) If you are using BCS:
    a. Within FMBBC transaction you have the option to release the budget, use document type as REL (release).
    b. You can activate the automatic release for each budget profile in Customizing of Funds Management Government.   To do this, in IMG select Funds Management Government ® Budgeting and Availability Control (Former Budgeting) ® Budget Profiles (Former Budgeting) ® Set Up Budget Profiles.
    With the automatic release, the corresponding background releases for expenditures FM account assignments with budget transfers are also posted. Take note that the maximum amount that this automated release can transfer from the sender is the amount that has already been released.
    If you do not activate the automated release, the maximum amount that can be transferred from the sender is that which has not yet been released.
    c. You can use the mass transaction for release, which is FMMPRELE.
    I hope that this answer your inquiry.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa Barth.

  • F-19 Reverse statistical Posting

    Hello to everyone
    My special G/L   " F "   (Down Payment Request) has two  Reconciliation accounts. Then when i am trying to active the flag " open item Management " pop up it warning:
    Open item management is not defined for reconciliation accounts
    Why need i change it ?? cos in the transaction f-19 when i am trying to Reverse statistical Posting pop up that:
    No due items exist at the key date
    It statistical posting is caming from SD... ""the billing plan"" when i do the billing. But after that i try to reverse it statistical posting and it is impossible.
    Any help to reverse it??
    Many thanx

    Hi ,
    Try to reverse the Billing document , that has been triggered from Sales and Distribution.
    Document posted through integration is not possible to reverse through FI.
    Thanks and regards
    Praveen.J

  • Fund Management- Business place

    Dear Team,
    In fund management, i am creating request of payment Tcode F871, fi document is created in background and get parked, such request is released Tcode F874 and ultimately posted Tcode 870.when posted FI document which was parked while request creation gets posted.
    My question is about the field " Business place" and " Section Code" which is neither available at the time of creation of request nor available at the time of posting of request.
    SInce Business place field ( BUPLA) is blanck, TDS certificate can not be generated.
    Please advice how to get " Business place" field in F871/ F870
    Thanks,
    Nilesh Pitale.

    Hi,
    maybe this document will help you more:
    http://perlhosting.net/download/968192356.html
    SAP78V

  • Fund managment period change

    How to change fund managment period from existing (APRIL TO MARCH) TO OCT TO SEPTEMBER.
    WE ARE TRYING TO CHANGE THAT USING
    public cector mgmt
    fund mgmnt govt
    basic setting
    fiscal year setting
    define fiscal year setting
    there we have v3 as april to march and
    v9 as oct to sept
    originally we had assigned v3 to Financial year and to fund mgmt period both.
    but now we want to assign v9 to fund mgmt period.
    But system is not allowing us to do that. How can we achive it and what are the reasons for errors.

    Hi,
    If you already post to FM then you can't change the FY variant. The only way I see is:
    A) Delete all posting.
    B) Change the setting
    C) Reload by "subsequent" transactions.
    In case you direct post to FM (E.G budget) you have to reenter. Alternativerly, if you have mass data you entered, write a small program that download the line items and reload after the changes (you can use CATT or ECATT to load the flat file you create).
    Hope this help you.
    Benni

  • The application has accessed a fund managements or cash mgt module with par

    When I am trying to post a entry Mesage appears F1030
    The application has accessed a fund managements or cash mgt module with parameters missinfg or defective
    Please solve

    Hi,
    This error occurs when you post data which is not related to that specific company code.
    post the correct data and check.If the problem still exits.Please clearly explain the problem.
    Thanks
    micheal

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unable to capture video

    I have FCP HD 4.5. I am trying to capture video from a camcorder. I can connect the camera to my iMac via the cameras DV port into the firewire port or by the camera's USB port into the computer's USB. I have tried both ways but the camera is not bei

  • Going through all the nodes children (JTree)

    Hello all, I'm detecting clicks on a JTree, and I want a method that goes from that node to the end of the tree (all the leaves). The method will be invoked if the node has children of course, I want to do this recursively but I don't know how. Can a

  • Should I use Database Partitioning now ?

    Hi, I have an Employee table in an HR system, consist of data of 10 branch, total 3,5 million rows, size about 8-10 GB. Each branch only allowed to access data of their branch. BUT some department could access all data. Given this information, should

  • Interpreting JSP code in Java code

    Hi,      I am writing a scheduler to generate emails based on certain events. The email body constructed using HTML. I was constructing the HTML string for the body using string concats. Its quickly becoming untenable to maintain the code whenever I

  • Illustrator video tutorials and demos

    Impossible to watch Illustrator video tutorials and demos. Sound is ok but no image. What's wrong?