Future support for APPV Management Servers

I have heard rumors that APPV is moving away from the separate Management servers and future releases will only support SCCM integration.  Is this a true roadmap ?

I don't have any insider information BUT I have not heard this from anybody. I'd lean on the side of not believing this. It's still an ok solution for small Enterprise. 
Considering the announcement yesterday, what the future holds for App-V should be very interesting.
PLEASE MARK ANY ANSWERS TO HELP OTHERS Blog:
rorymon.com Twitter: @Rorymon

Similar Messages

  • Future support for using PL/SQL core business logic with ADF BC

    We want to migrate our large Forms client/server (6i) application to ADF, possibly using a migration tool like Ciphersoft Exodus.
    One scenario could be to use ADF BC and ADF-Faces or a different JSF-Implementation for presentation and business layer but keep our heavy PL/SQL-businesslogic inside the Oracle database in packages, triggers, functions and procedures.
    This scenario could be chosen due to the huge amount of interconnected logic inside the database (10 years of development; no technical components; any package may access any table and more of this kind of dependencies). The business logic nowadays held in Forms client will be moved mainly into the database as a prerequisite to this scenario.
    Choosing this "keep-logic-in-DB"-scenario we need a good support by ADF BC to do so. We know and prototyped that it is possible to call some PL/SQL via JDBC from ADF BC and it is possible to use stored procedure calls for standard business entity data access (ins, del, upd, ..). But this does not solve our problems. We want to reuse core business logic coded in PL/SQL. This is much more than change the ADF standard behavior for an update with an own PL/SQL-call.
    Now my question:
    Will there be a kind of sophisticated support to use ADF BC in combination with database-kept logic?
    If so, when will this happen and how will the common problems of transactional state inside the database and inside the ADF BC be solved? Any plans or ideas yet?
    Many other clients do have similar applications built in Forms and PL/SQL and would be glad to hear about a path of direction.
    I've read the technical article 'understanding the ADF BC state management feature' which you have contributed to. One current limitation is pointed out there: Using PL/SQL with ADF BC limits ADF AM pooling to 'restricted level' which reduces scalability.
    Are you aware of additional main problems/tasks to solve when using PL/SQL heavily with ADF BC, which we have to think about?
    Thank you for any response.
    Ingmar

    My main problem is two 'concurrent' areas holding state in an application system based on DB-stored PL/SQL-logic in combination with ADF BC.
    For a new System everything can be made ok:
    Sure, it is possible to build a new system with the business logic included in ADF BC only. All long-living state will be handled in the BC layer ( including support for UnitsOfWork longer than the webside short HTTP-requests and HTTP-sessions and longer than the database transactions.
    For an old system these problems arise:
    1. DB data changes not reflected in BC layer:
    Our PL/SQL-logic changes data in tables without notifying the ADF BC layer (and its cache). To keep the data in ADF BC entity objects identical to the changed database content a synchronization is needed. BC does not know which part of the application data has been changed because it has not initiated the changes through its entity objects. Therefore a full refresh is needed. In a Forms4GL environment the behavior is similar: We do frequently requeries of all relevant (base)tables after calling database stored logic to be sure to get the changed data to display and to operate on it.
    -> Reengineering of the PL/SQL-logic to make the ADF BC layer aware of the changes is a big effort (notifying BC about any change)
    2. longer living database transactions
    Our PL/SQL-logic in some areas makes use of lengthy database transactions. The technical DB-transaction is similar to the UnitOfWork. If we call this existing logic from ADF BC, database state is produced which will not be DB-committed in the same cycle.
    This reduces scalability of ADF BC AM pooling.
    Example:
    a) Call a DB-stored logic to check if some business data is consistent and prepare some data for versioning. This starts a DB-transaction but does not commit it.
    b) Control is handed back to the user interface. Successful result of step a) is displayed
    c) User now executes the versioning operation
    d) Call another DB-stored logic to execute the versioning. DB-transaction is still open
    e) Business layer commits the transaction automatically after successful finishing step d). Otherwise everything from a) to e) is rolled back.
    -> redesign of this behavior (= cutting the 1to1 relation between LogicalUnitOfWork and the technicalDatabaseTransaction is a big effort due to the big amount of code.

  • Consolidate ports for multiple managed servers

    Hello, say I've got two managed servers on a single machine - A and B. Each is running a different app in its own jvm on separate ports. Now what I'd like to do is be able to access both apps via the same port..just with different context paths like this:
    http://myserver/a/ would go to the managed server A app
    http://myserver/b/ would go to the manged server B app
    I don't want to put apache or anything else in front of them to do this. I want to know if weblogic itself provides a way to do it either through config or admin server somehow. Thanks for any ideas.

    Ports must be unique when running on the same machine
    A front controller (which do not want to use) is the way to do it.

  • SQL Server 2014 support for Workflow Manager?

    Is this configuration supported?
    The prerequisite requirements for Workflow Manager are out of date and do not even list SQL 2012 R2 as a supported DB server.

    Hi JB
    We installed Workflow Manager 1.0 on a Dev SharePoint 2013 SP1 + April 2014 CU Farm running Against SQLServer 2014 which I suspect in not much different under the hood to your SQL2012R2.
    Freelance consultant

  • UsNIC support for UCSM managed C-series server

    According to
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/usnic/c/deployment/1_5_2/b_Cisco_usNIC_Deployment_Guide_For_Standalone_C-SeriesServers.html
    usNIC is only supported for standalone c-series server, with VIC-1225 and RHEL
    Any plans to support this for UCSM managed c-series (connected with FEX to FI), and additional OS, e.g. W2012 R2 ?

    Hello Walter,
    usNIC dev team actively write blogs under HPC and you might get better response for your questions / comments to those posts :-)
    http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/ultra-low-latency-ethernet-questions-and-answers/
    http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/
    HTH
    Padma

  • Support for Container Managed XA Txn?

    I have been searching the online documentation but have been unable to
              determine if WLS 6.0 Container Managed Transactions include support for XA
              transactions. That is, the EJB container will start a distributed
              transaction. Or, it is necessary to use Bean Managed Transactions.
              

    Carl Lawstuen wrote:
              > I have been searching the online documentation but have been unable to
              > determine if WLS 6.0 Container Managed Transactions include support for XA
              > transactions. That is, the EJB container will start a distributed
              > transaction.
              Yes
              > Or, it is necessary to use Bean Managed Transactions.
              No.
              -- Rob
              

  • Why SCOM 2012 R2 Agent version for Service Manager servers is 6.1.7221.49, why not 7.1.10184.

    Hi ,
    In SCOM 2012 R2 console  if i look at all of my agent managed servers have agent builds of 7.1.10184 but my two service manager  servers have agent builds of 6.1.7221.49
    Can anyone let me know is this known issue or how can we upgrade the agent to correct version.
    Thanks in advance
    Bharath

    Hi,
    SCOM and SCSM are built on the same structure, Management Servers and DAta Warehouse etc. This means that when you install the SCSM Management Server, the Microsoft Monitoring Agent is also installed. When
    you want to monitor Service Manager and the server it´s installed on, you need to configure the SCOM parameters from the control panel at the SCSM management server.
    If you were to try and install the SCOM agent at the SCSM server, it would fail and tell you that you can´t install the agent on a server where Service Manager is installed. The agent will be upgraded when
    you upgrade Service Manager so this is all expected and It´s as it should be :)
    Regards,
    Daniel
    IT Consultant at Viridis IT

  • Future support for C++0x in Sun Studio

    I've recently been having to defend my choice of using the sun studio compiler against several gcc advocates here in the office. The one reasonable issue they keep bringing up is when the upcoming C++0x (more like C++1x or even C++2x at the pace the standards committee is operating at) features will be available in complete fashion in sun studio. They say, and I have to begrudgingly agree, that judging by the amount of time it took studio to support boost (template templates, certain partial template specializations, etc), there could be a long delay between the release of gcc's C++0x support and that of studio's.
    I understand that many of the new features of C++0x, even from initial glance, appear to be quite complicated, especially lambda functors and their associated []/auto return types, variadac template parameters and class concept checking. In addition, I understand gcc has an unfair advantage so to speak since it is being used as the test bed for many of the committee proposal submitter's proof-of-concept implementations (the variadic template parameter feasibility implementation written for gcc comes to mind).
    Could a developer please assuage my fears and inform me that the studio team has a roadmap/timeframe in place to release a studio that fully supports the new language-level features in a reasonably competitive time frame? It apparently will be the responsibility of the STLPort team to essentially copy many of boost's libraries (shared_ptrs, random numbers, type_traits) and rename them and move them to the std namespace and also supply the new unordered<> containers, to name a few.
    I for one can't wait until boost::mpl, boost::fusion, boost::format and others are all reduced from 10's of 1000's of lines of pre-processor generated crufty template definitions to a single variadic template declaration. Also, I won't feel quite so willfully derelict to efficient code every time i bust out an std::for_each and drop in a boost::bind generated functor and instead can use a lambda function with the various efficiency gains ranging from direct referencing to the stack variables passed in as the closure arguments to the ability for the compiler to actually inline the body of the lambda function where appropriate.
    I'm in no way trying to accuse you compiler developers of being slow to implement features, but just would like to be assured that there is nothing to worry about and there is a plan and current work being done on the required features. I know it's still a couple of years off, but I personally can't wait to replace hundreds of lines of boost::bind() calls with their more efficent lambda equivalent, and in addition clean up interfaces that could have used boost::bind if it weren't for the unacceptable overhead introduced often executed blocks of code.
    Thanks,
    Chris Knight - Faithful sun studio user through at least 2 major name changes and since at lest when it was called Forte 4.2 and RougeWave and classicIO libraries roamed the earth in vast quantities.
    P.S. I truly fear that the other 3 major compilers (gnu, intel, ms) will be out the door with C++0x in around the same time and boost will then willingly drop support for the sun compiler if it doesn't support the required language features at that time as they had no problem not supporting studio at all until Studio 12 so I'm sure as soon as the 3 compilers they run nightly tests with support it, they'll be just as eager to
    make use of the new features as I am.
    This leaves someone who has based their entire system on Solaris + SunStudio + Boost in a potentially undesirable situation. Solaris is far too stable and Linux to ever-changing to ever consider Linux as a platform for critical systems yet the idea of running g++ on Solaris w/ gcc's propensity to change their ABI on a weekly basis gives me immediate heartburn.
    Thanks again.

    You raise some very good points, and believe me, we are even more aware of them than you are!
    Short answer: We are planning to bring out a compiler conforming to C++0X in a timely fashion.
    Longer answer:
    Right now, we are working on providing binary compatibility with g++ as an option in the next compiler release. When we are done, you will be able to use g++ headers with Sun C++, and link the code with binaries created by g++. The first implementation will be on Linux. (Which versions of g++ and which versions of Linux? Stay tuned.)
    Implementing all the new features of C++0X will require a re-design of parts of the compiler front end. The current compiler organization does not support "concepts", for example. (We've been looking for an excuse to re-design the front end for a while, and C++0x is not just an excuse -- it's a requirement.) With the g++ ABI work done, we'll ready to start the re-design, and begin to implement C++0x features.
    We won't release an official (stable, fully-supported) product with C++0X features until the standard is final. Until then, any feature could change in unpredictable ways. We got caught by that problem with C++ 4.2 and C++98 -- we implemented what we thought were final features that changed dramatically after we released the compiler. We won't do that again. Compiler stability is one of our most important considerations.
    Beginning some time next year, we expect to have Express releases with some C++0X features. Express releases are our way of providing compilers with experimental features that might not be stable yet. It gives our customers a chance to try them out and provide feedback before they become part of a stable release. That is to say, a feature flagged as experimental is subject to change, and compatibility with other Express or official releases is not guaranteed. We can therefore fix bugs and catch up with late changes in the Standard as necessary.
    We have not yet done all the planning for our C++0X compiler, so I can't give you any estimates about specific feature availability and time frames. When we are farther along, we'll post the road map on a public site, and I'll announce it here.
    Steve Clamage
    Sun C++ Team

  • Groups possible for many managed servers?

    Hi,
    we have to manage 30+ servers in 6 different locations.
    In Microsoft Remote Desktop for Mac V 8.0.15 there is only one main group called "My Desktops" and all servers are listed in this group. I don't see a function to add more groups to have a ordered list. Is this possible?

    Hi,
    Sorry to say but still there is no such way to add other group in ordered list.  
    Thanks for your understanding!
    Dharmesh Solanki
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • DHCP support for weblogic app servers

    Hey there,
    Iam new to this product. I wanted to know if any of the weblogic app servers support
    DHCP. What I mean is if the IP address
    changes then would it automatically pick it up?
    -Samit

    Hi Raj,
    For Application server what type of scenior you are using.
    Did you made share of /usr/sap/ or /sapmnt to you application sever.
    if yes, then you have to just upgrade the kernal in CI & not in Apps
    If no, then you have to manually upgrade the kernal on CI & apps.
    Thanks
    Anil

  • BlackBerry 10 support for desktop manager ASAP!!!

    Hi. My work just upgraded my phone and to the 4G EE network two weeks ago and initially got a Nokia limit (as they BBC10 hadn't launched) but as windows phone 8 didn't support outlook sync and I've been a loyal blackberry user for years, we sent the last phone back as I knew the new blackberry 10 was coming out and loved desktop manager for its usability with outlook so I assumed I would be able to sync my work contacts with the new blackberry Z10. 
    How utterly disjointed that blackberry 10 doesn't support desktop manager and blackberry link does sync with outlook. The old Research in Motion would never have wanted to alienate their loyal followers. But this is the new Blackberry. Microsoft did the same thing when they stopped supporting activsync on windows phone with their own software but I never thought blackberry would follow them. 
    Will desktop manager be upgraded soon to blackberry 10 or shall I send my new Z10 back along with WP8 and get an I Phone or Android device!
    I can't believe I demanded the new blackberry now! 

    Your right!!
    Blackberry should just shut the door and turn the lights out, the lack of ability to sync with outlook is the last straw. My Z10 arrives in 3 hours and isn't even going to be unwrapped and is going straight back. I'll keep my 9800 till it dies and then get something else, why should anyone of us as customers accept a backward step..

  • X64 bit support for Media Manager

    Does anyone know when 64 bit support will be written for the Media Manager.  I am currently using a work around by setting my phone as an external drive and Windows Media Manager to sync my music, but I would like to use a more intergrated piece of software so that I don't have to do so many different things to customize my Droid X.
    Windows 7 Ultimate Edition x64.

    Hello! This is Noah with Verizon Wireless. Hope you are having a great day!
    I apologize but currently there is no information on the release of an update for the V Cast Media Manager software.

  • Listing of BAPI's or ABAP support for Solution Manager

    Hi,
      Does anyone know of any BAPI's or ABAP RFCs/API associated with the Solution Manager?
    Thank You,
    Phil

    http://service.sap.com/patches
    --> Entry by Application Group
    --> SAP Technology Components
    --> SAP SOLUTION MANAGER
    --> SAP SOLUTION MANAGER 7.0
    --> Support Package Stacks
    Give your source and destination support package and download them.
    Markus

  • Current/Future Support for Exchange Folders and Task List Items

    Are there any plans for SES to be able to index public Exchange folders and task list items?
    Does anyone know or is aware of any workarounds for indexing public folders and task lists?
    Thanks in advance.

    Are there any plans for SES to be able to index public Exchange folders and task list items?
    Does anyone know or is aware of any workarounds for indexing public folders and task lists?
    Thanks in advance.

  • Future support for Scroll Bar Events?, Any workarounds?

    I am wondering whether there is an intention to add scroll bar
    events to Forms. These would be incredibly useful in a number of
    situations ie
    1) You have a window with two stacked canvases. One contains
    items in a tabular MR block style. It has a horizontal scroll
    bar. When the user scrolls this view, I want to move another
    stacked canvas by the scrolled amount, to keep it in synch with
    the underlying items.
    2) Similar problem for block scroll bars. In a MR block, I have
    a list item on a stacked canvas, that I reposition over the the
    current record. This is acheived by writing a When-New-record-
    Instance trigger. Unfortunately, when the user scrolls with the
    scroll bar, the stacked canvas obviously doesn't move.
    The only solution I have found is to use timers, which is very
    messy
    null

    Hello,
    This is a well-known issue with this code, as you can see in the thread you copied the code from.
    In the following post, Laura is presenting an IE only solution, based on a different code I wrote - Re: How to implement fixed column headers . Cross browser solution is yet to be found.
    Regards,
    Arie.

Maybe you are looking for