Future Support of Windows versions (XP,Windows 7, XP Embedded, Embedded Standard)

In the "LabWindows/CVI OS Support Roadmap" is statement of the actually supported Windows versions.
I am additional interested in prognoses how lon the Windows versions will be supported (XP,Windows 7, XP Embedded,  Embedded Standard).

Hi,
Look please here, you will find both Informations:
LabWindows/CVI Life Cycle Dates
LabWindows/CVI OS Support Roadmap
http://www.ni.com/lwcvi/product-lifecycle/
Kais Mekacher
Applications Engineer
Germany - Munich

Similar Messages

  • Maximum number of processor sockets in Windows Server 2012 Datacenter and Standard

    I have found no documentation on the technical number of supported processor sockets supported by Windows Server 2012 for the Standard and Datacenter editions.
    Some donation websites like Techsoup claim that Datacenter supports 64 physical processors and Standard 8, but I can find no authoritative confirmation of this and those look like extrapolation from Windows Server 2008 R2.
    So what are the maximum supported # of processor sockets, assuming you have licenses for all of them, for Datacenter and Standard? Do they differ by edition?
    In addition, is it true that the total # of supported logical processors in a single system is 640 w/o Hyper-V? It was originally reported to be that, but since Hyper-V's number doubled from 160 in the Beta to 320 in the RC and RTM, did this double too?

    You might find some of the information you are looking for here -
    http://download.microsoft.com/download/2/C/A/2CA38362-37ED-4112-86A8-FDF14D5D4C9B/WS%202012%20Feature%20Comparison_Hyper-V.pdf.  I know there is one change that is not reflected there.  Recently the maximum number of virtual machines supported
    in a cluster was raised to 8,000 instead of the 4,000 reflected in this document.
    The maximum number of sockets for Standard would be two because that is the maximum number that the license supports.  Standard has never supported 8.  Prior to 2012, it supported 4, and then the licensing changed with 2012 so that Standard would
    be sold per processor (socket) with a maximum of two.  Technically, the binaries are the same for Standard and Datacenter, so you can most likely get it to run with more somehow, but it is not a supported configuration.
    The maximum number of sockets for Datacenter would be 64 - that has not changed from 2008.  I make this statement based on the fact that Datacenter supports a maximum of 64 virtual CPUs when run as a virtual machine.  Virtual machines don't have
    the distinction of socket versus hyper-thread versus core.  They see what is presented to them as a processor.  But, I doubt very much that you will find any off-the-shelf 64 socket systems; most vendors are relying on the core densities instead
    of socket density in order to deliver the horsepower.  The above referenced document still shows 320 as the maximum number of logical processors, with or without Hyper-V.
    tim

  • Windows 8.1 Recovery Nothing works says " not support by this version".

    Recently my computer crashed after the 8.1 830M   (April 17, 2014)  update. System went totally unstable. Have been making Windows Images for a long time in the event of a crash. Windows Recovery
    would not let me Restore Image, Reset, or Refresh with my Recovery Drive (USB).  It told me "not support by this version". I have a legal Win 8.0 that I upgraded to 8.1. Tried everything for a week then gave up. Is Windows 8.1 purposely NOT
    ALLOWING restoring with the Windows Image? 

     Windows Recovery would not let me Restore Image, Reset, or Refresh with my Recovery Drive (USB).  It told me "not support by this version". I have a legal Win 8.0 that I upgraded to 8.1
    Since you upgraded your PC to Windows 8.1, we need to use Windows 8.1 image or media to refresh your PC.
    Meanwhile, you said your computer crashed after installing Windows 8.1 update 1.
    Please check the event viewer to see if some error log appeared when the issue occurred.
    Regard,
    Kelvin Xu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Does Firefox 7.o have a supported 64-bit version for Windows 7?

    On the system requirements page for Firefox 7.0, I found the following statement: "Please note that while the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows Vista and Windows 7 can be used to run Firefox 6, only 32-bit builds of Firefox 6 are supported. at this time."
    I do not understand why Firefox 6 is mentioned on the Firefox 7 system requirements page. I have Windows 7, 64 bit version.
    Does Firefox 7.0 have a supported 64 bit version that runs on Windows 7--64 bit version?

    Not yet. The web page text is incorrect.

  • Microsoft health "notifications are not supported in this version of windows phone"

    Adding some tiles to my Band shows the 'Notifications are not supported in this version of Windows Phone' error.
    The affected tiles include calls, mail, Facebook, Cortana and Facebook messenger. My Lumia 630 is running on the version 8.10.14234.375 of WP8.1 Preview for Developers. Microsoft Health is Version 1.3.10424.1. Microsoft Health is allowed to run
    in Background.

    Never mind. It's actually working now.
    The health app wasn't presenting me with a request to access notifications. Strangely on the 4th or 5th time opening the app it did.

  • Microsoft Band adding some tiles using Health app displays "Notifications are not supported in this version of Windows Phone"

    Adding some tiles to my Band shows the 'Notifications are not supported in this version of Windows Phone' error.
    The affected tiles include calls, mail, Facebook, Cortana and Facebook messenger. My Lumia 1520 is running on the latest version of WP8.1 Preview for Developers. Why is this the case?

    Never mind. It's actually working now.
    The health app wasn't presenting me with a request to access notifications. Strangely on the 4th or 5th time opening the app it did.

  • SBS 2008 - Microsoft Azure Active Directory Module for Windows PowerShell - is not supported by your version

    Hi,
    I was following the artigle (http://www.messageops.com/resources/office-365-documentation/ad-fs-with-office-365-step-by-step-guide/) but
    when try to install the 'Office 365 PowerShell Module' shows a msg saying that 'windows azure active directory module for windows powershell is not supported by your version'.
    And according to the blog (http://blogs.office.com/2014/04/15/synchronizing-your-directory-with-office-365-is-easy/) "DirSync can be
    installed on an existing domain controller"
    >>>> Any help is appreciated.
    * Similar issue: http://www.adaxes.com/forum/post7398.html

    Ok Vasil tks for reply, but this server is 64x. I dont get the point.
    Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6002]
    C:\Users\Administrator>set
    ALLUSERSPROFILE=C:\ProgramData
    APPDATA=C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Roaming
    CLIENTNAME=ANJOTEC_NOTE01
    CommonProgramFiles=C:\Program Files\Common Files
    CommonProgramFiles(x86)=C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files
    COMPUTERNAME=COMPANYBR-SERVER
    ComSpec=C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe
    FP_NO_HOST_CHECK=NO
    HOMEDRIVE=C:
    HOMEPATH=\Users\Administrator
    lib=C:\Program Files\SQLXML 4.0\bin\
    LOCALAPPDATA=C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local
    LOGONSERVER=\\COMPANYBR-SERVER
    NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS=4
    OS=Windows_NT
    Path=C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\javapath;C:\Program Files\HP\NCU;C:\Windows\sys
    em32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\
    1.0\;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\binn\;C:\Program File
    (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\80\Tools\Binn\;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Serve
    \90\DTS\Binn\;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\binn\;C:\Program F
    les (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\90\DTS\Binn\;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQ
    Server\90\Tools\Binn\VSShell\Common7\IDE\;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Vis
    al Studio 8\Common7\IDE\PrivateAssemblies\;C:\Program Files (x86)\ExchangeMapi\
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Roxio Shared\DLLShared\;C:\Program Files (x
    6)\Common Files\Roxio Shared\DLLShared\;C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Rox
    o Shared\9.0\DLLShared\;C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\bin;C:\Progr
    m Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\Scripts
    PATHEXT=.COM;.EXE;.BAT;.CMD;.VBS;.VBE;.JS;.JSE;.WSF;.WSH;.MSC
    PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE=AMD64
    PROCESSOR_IDENTIFIER=Intel64 Family 6 Model 30 Stepping 5, GenuineIntel
    PROCESSOR_LEVEL=6
    PROCESSOR_REVISION=1e05
    ProgramData=C:\ProgramData
    ProgramFiles=C:\Program Files
    ProgramFiles(x86)=C:\Program Files (x86)
    PROMPT=$P$G
    PSModulePath=C:\Windows\system32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\Modules\
    PUBLIC=C:\Users\Public
    RoxioCentral=C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Roxio Shared\9.0\Roxio Central
    3\
    SESSIONNAME=RDP-Tcp#0
    SystemDrive=C:
    SystemRoot=C:\Windows
    TEMP=C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\2
    TMP=C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\2
    USERDNSDOMAIN=COMPANYBR.LOCAL
    USERDOMAIN=COMPANYBR
    USERNAME=administrator
    USERPROFILE=C:\Users\Administrator
    windir=C:\Windows
    C:\Users\Administrator>

  • Support for Windows 7 / Snow Leopard Mac OS X

         I see in the compatibility table that Adobe has that Director is not supported under Windows 7 or Mac OS X Snow Leopard.  Will this compatibility issue change in the future?  Is Director being phased out in favor of other 3D authoring programs?

    Well, for me it's critical.
    In the education community, cross platform is more than a nice-to-have, it's beyond important. If Shockwave isn't available on the standard Mac setup it's useless. If the Director IDE isn't being actively developed for the current OS it's not a dependable thing to predicate a development programme on.
    We had this for a while with Rosetta / Firefox / OSX and after a fraught period of fighting with clients using Safari native for everything else and Firefox with Shockwave in Rosetta, everyone just gave up and we had to drop Mac support.
    Director 11 / Shockwave on Macs was the only chance we have of staying with Director at all. To find that we are left high and dry with no solution again after six months of usable time in 10.5 is criminal on Adobe's part.
    The shockwave install on PCs is bad enough ... it's only saved because of the MSI version.
    When OS X first came out, Safari was the problem browser, at least Firefox / Rosetta / Shockwave was 90% dependable. Now Firefox / Shockwave is 100% undependable and all we have is Safari / Shockwave which is at best 90% dependable. To find that Adobe have taken that away is unbelievable.
    Get your act together guys. Adobe appear to be killing Director as a product without admitting to it.
    You can kill it by saying you are killing it, or you can kill it by starvation. At least owning up and saying you are stopping development would give us a clear path, we could cut our losses and make a decision on what to do next.
    Giving a little bit of encouragement and then taking away all hope repeatedly is a very immoral thing to do.
    *Furious*
    Education Software Developer
    UK

  • Is SharePoint 2010 Supported on Windows 2012 R2

    Hi
    I have read Trevor Seward's responses to various questions on this subject :-
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/ad4e17ee-83de-41d6-a974-244ceccb8a63/is-sharepoint-2010-sp1-is-supported-by-windows-server-2012-currently-i-have-os-version-of-server?forum=sharepointadminprevious
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/e7539d34-aaa2-4d9c-a44c-e65d388d8944/support-for-sharepoint-foundation-2010-on-windows-server-2012-r2?forum=sharepointadminprevious
    However, we have a farm which is currently SP2010 SP1 which we are about to upgrade to SP2010 SP2 running on Windows Server 2008R2 and SQL Server 2008 R2. So the farm is currently not supported by Microsoft.
    We are now looking to upgrade this farm to SP2013 SP1 running Windows Server 2012 R2 and SQL Server 2012.
    We plan to start this process of by upgrading Windows Server 2008 R2 to Windows Server 2012 R2.
    Will SharePoint 2010 SP2 run on Windows 2012 R2 (or will we need Windows 2012) ?
    Once Server 2012 R2 (or Server 2012) is up and running, we will upgrade SP2010 SP2 to Sp2013 SP1.
    Finally upgrade SQL Server 2008R2 to SQL Server 2012.
    So the part I don't know is will SharePoint 2010 SP2 run on Windows 2012 R2 or Windows 2012 ?
    Thanks
    Nigel
    Nigel Price NJPEnterprises

    Not a question for the Windows Server people.  This is a question for the SharePoint people.  You may want to try asking in a SharePoint forum like
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=sharepointadminprevious
    . : | : . : | : . tim

  • Level of local SQLCE/other DB support in windows phone 8.1/using linq to sql from dll?

    I have had a mixed opinion for SQLCE support in windows phone 8/8.1. Is their still support for a local SQLCE or other database in windows phone 8.1? (A lot of different blog articles created their own handlers it appears and one used
    an visual studio app called SQLmetal) I am hoping to at least figure out the libraries to use for Linq to SQL in windows phone 8.1 in order to access a local Database. I only need to retrieve data from a simple Database with one -
    two tables and one of the tables has three fields.
    I wish to access the local DB from a dll file even if I have to use Linq to SQL. The reason for this is to store data for a simple game while the app is running. However, I may need to send data to the database and would like to separate that
    from the main application if possible. The only other question is: how do I add local database support to a dll file in windows phone 8.1? (This is my main objective but I need to know my database options first)
    Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. - "Sherlock holmes" "speak softly and carry a big stick" - theodore roosevelt. Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering
    - Yoda. Blog - http://www.computerprofessions.co.nr

    Windows Phone Silverlight 8.1 apps can still use LINQ to SQL (System.Data.Linq) see:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/hh202860(v=vs.105).aspx
    For Windows Phone 8.1 [runtime] app you would need to use an external library like
    SQLite 
    There is a jumpstart training talk on using SQLite in Windows Phone 8.1 apps here:
    http://channel9.msdn.com/Series/Building-Apps-for-Windows-Phone-8-1/19
    I'm not sure what you mean by: "...access the local DB from a dll file..."  Do you mean you want the library used to access the database to be portable across
    platforms?
    Eric Fleck, Windows Store and Windows Phone Developer Support. If you would like to provide feedback or suggestions for future improvements to the Windows Phone SDK please go to http://wpdev.uservoice.com/ where you can post your suggestions and/or cast
    your votes for existing suggestions.
    I saw the first link and I think I have already been through some of that tutorial on channel 9 already.
    I'm not sure what you mean by: "...access the local DB from a dll file..."  Do you mean you want the library used to access the database to be portable across platforms?
    This would be a yes. I need use it to submit an application to the store (I wish to have the data and business logic in the dll file while having the GUI separate). I am currently using the portable dll but if you think using another dll type would help
    I will try that. I am a VB.NET programmer and so I can see where some programmers get their worries about SQLCE (It seems a lot of VB and VB.NET programmers like it from my time helping on the VB.NET forums second to SQL Server only).
    Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. - "Sherlock holmes" "speak softly and carry a big stick" - theodore roosevelt. Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering
    - Yoda. Blog - http://www.computerprofessions.co.nr
    Nevermind, I changed the dll type to "Silverlight" and I can use the System.Data.Linq reference at least.
    Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. - "Sherlock holmes" "speak softly and carry a big stick" - theodore roosevelt. Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to
    suffering - Yoda. Blog - http://www.computerprofessions.co.nr

  • Is 11.1.2.1 (32 bit) not supported for windows xp professional (SP2)

    Is 11.1.2.1 (32 bit) not supported for windows xp professional (SP2).
    Edited by: 867760 on Aug 18, 2011 3:36 PM

    No, it is not supported as a server.
    Please refer: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-foundation/oracle-hyperion-epm-system-certific-131801.xls for supported versions.
    HTH-
    Jasmine.

  • Java 1.4.2_03 support on Windows 2003 RC2

    I installed Windows 2003 RC2 64-bit onto a Sun X4100.
    Put in all the drivers and tools and everything works fine.
    There is a cool tool called "LSI Logic MyManager" that utilizes java to monitor the status of the hardware OS mirror on the LSI controller.
    However, after my customer installed some of their applications, the LSI Logic MyManager couldn't start anymore. Further investigation found out that the java went quiet.
    Below are a few findings:
    1. After new installation, when java was still working, the command "java -version" will show the correct java and version installed. But now, the same command just skips a line and back to prompt.
    2. When I start the LSI Logic MyManager, it shows an error saying "Couldn't find the correct java version (1.4.2_03)"
    3. Tried installing newer java like 1.4, 1.5 and also 1.6 but the software specifically looks for 1.4.2_03 only.
    4. Tried uninstalling the software but erred with "Couldn't find the correct java version (1.4.2_03)" too
    5. Tried installing the software onto another server (the application is able to start, as well as java) and copy the whole directory back to the server with problem. Application behave the same, shows error, and java has no response (like dead).
    6. There are no newer version of LSI Logic MyManager available that hopefully supports newer java version.
    So, that'all above things that I tried to solve the mystery. Anyone, any advice or solution will be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

    Sorry for the duplicated message. It's my first post and I messed up a little with the right section.
    A new downloaded copy of the file or other versions of Java failed to install with the same error message.
    I've learned there is a product ID in the registry that must be present for the installer to run. I'm searching for this "mysterious" product ID and how to set the right Windows XP Registry entry for the JSE 1.4.2_03 version.
    I'm still not sure this will fix the problem.
    Thanks for replying.

  • Crystal Report XI R2 - RDC supported on Windows 64-bit

    Hello!
    We are using Crystal Report XI R2 runtime RDC component on Windows 32-bit platform.
    Is the RDC supported on Windows 64-bit platform?
    Best regards,
    A.

    Hi Alessandro,
    The version of Crystal Reports that comes with MS Visual Studio .NET, which is CR version 10.x, is 64 bit but is quite limited in it's functionality. Only some export types and database drivers are supported. It basically only allows you to view reports, no RCAPI functionalty at all.
    I suggest not going that way. RDC is not 64 bit at all, it's old COM engine and will not work in 64 bit mode as I said above. The RDC is not supoorted using .NET also.
    Thank again
    Don

  • CAD is not supporting in windows 8

    CAD is not supporting in windows 8. Has there no any solution to install CAD in windows 8?

    Hello
    In order to run CAD within a Windows 8 environment, you would have to run or upgrade to UCCX 10.5.1 and your Windows version would have to be 8.1.
    http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_CCX_Software_Compatibility_Matrix_for_10.5(1)
    Hope this helps
    Tony
    Pleas rate helpful posts

  • Are Crystal 9 and Crystal 10 supported with Windows 7?

    I have Crystal 9 installed for Peoplesoft report development and Crystal 10 installed for Kronos report development.  We are moving to Windows 7 and I am doing testing of all our applications and third party tools now.  What I am finding is that both versions will install without error but I cannot connect the ODBC DataDirect drivers and no other drivers will work.  So If I cannot connect to our Oracle database then I am wondering if these version are in fact supported on Windows 7?  Can someone please respond/explain?

    Hello,
    Both versions of Crystal Reports are not supported on Windows 7. But I believe Peoplesoft have their own ODBC driver so you'll have to check with them if they support those versions. Our original DataDirect driver would not be supported on Windows 7.
    And I don't believe the current 5.3 version are supported in CR 9 and 10.
    PeopleSoft should be able to confirm if their OEM build of CR 9 and 10 are supported or even tested on that OS.
    Should also mention only version is CR 2008 Service Pack 2, CR XI R2 SP6 is also but it's end of escalation life cycle now, meaning no more patches will be created.
    Thank you
    Don
    Edited by: Don Williams on Sep 30, 2010 1:24 PM

Maybe you are looking for