Fuzzy search not returning results?

I'm executing a phonetic search on the nm_resource column. my application allows a call center employee to search on the resource name (nm_resource), if the resource is not found then they will enter a new one. The problem is someone may have already entered the resource name but spelled it incorrectly resulting in duplicate records for the same resource name. To enable the call center to retrieve records that may have the same sound but are spelled differently we have implemented the fuzzy search capability of Oracle text. Things have been going very nicely for the most part with the exception of this one issue we're trying to understand.
Using the query below we're searching for the resource name "rosies" the actual record in the database was entered as "rosy's". the search returns (rosies,rosie's,rosys) and does not return ---> rosy's <--- the record i'm interested in
it is reasonable to expect rosy's to be returned in the result set? my query should retunn the max fuzzy expansions and all fuzzy scores.
select score(1), nm_resource, ADDR_RSRC_ST_LN_1, id_resource, ADDR_RSRC_CITY FROM caps_resource where
CONTAINS (nm_resource,'fuzzy(rosies, 0, 5000, weight)',1)>0
union
select /*+index(caps_resource ind_caps_resource_8)*/ 10, nm_resource, ADDR_RSRC_ST_LN_1, id_resource, ADDR_RSRC_CITY from caps_resource 
where NM_RESOURCE_UPPER like upper(replace(replace('%' || 'rosies' || '%',' '), '-'))
and rownum<500 order by 1 DESC;
any help explaining this is much appriciated.
Regards,

When you index "Rosy's", by default it sees the apostropohe as a delimiter and tokenizes and indexes "Rosy" and "s" separately. So, you could only find it by searching the singular form or the singular form obtained by using stemming. However, if you set the apostrophoe as a skipjoin, then it tokenizes and indexes "Rosys" as one token that you can then search for that using "rosies":. Please see the demonstration below. You might also be interested in soundex, which can be used with Oracle Text, or the functions in the utl_match package or metaphone.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> CREATE TABLE caps_resource
  2    (nm_resource  VARCHAR2 (30))
  3  /
Table created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> INSERT ALL
  2  INTO caps_resource VALUES ('Rosy''s')
  3  SELECT * FROM DUAL
  4  /
1 row created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> SELECT * FROM caps_resource
  2  /
NM_RESOURCE
Rosy's
SCOTT@orcl_11g> CREATE INDEX your_text_idx ON caps_resource (nm_resource)
  2  INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CONTEXT
  3  PARAMETERS
  4       ('STOPLIST CTXSYS.EMPTY_STOPLIST')
  5  /
Index created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> SELECT token_text FROM dr$your_text_idx$i
  2  /
TOKEN_TEXT
ROSY
S
SCOTT@orcl_11g> SELECT * FROM caps_resource
  2  WHERE  CONTAINS (nm_resource, 'FUZZY (rosies, 0, 5000, weight)') > 0
  3  /
no rows selected
SCOTT@orcl_11g> DROP INDEX your_text_idx
  2  /
Index dropped.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> BEGIN
  2    CTX_DDL.CREATE_PREFERENCE ('your_lexer', 'BASIC_LEXER');
  3    CTX_DDL.SET_ATTRIBUTE ('your_lexer', 'SKIPJOINS', '''');
  4  END;
  5  /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> CREATE INDEX your_text_idx ON caps_resource (nm_resource)
  2  INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CONTEXT
  3  PARAMETERS
  4    ('STOPLIST CTXSYS.EMPTY_STOPLIST
  5        LEXER       your_lexer')
  6  /
Index created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> SELECT token_text FROM dr$your_text_idx$i
  2  /
TOKEN_TEXT
ROSYS
SCOTT@orcl_11g> SELECT * FROM caps_resource
  2  WHERE  CONTAINS (nm_resource, 'FUZZY (rosies, 0, 5000, weight)') > 0
  3  /
NM_RESOURCE
Rosy's
SCOTT@orcl_11g>

Similar Messages

  • Content scope document library does not return result for non farm administrator

    Hi
    I have a situation where I had to go with a unique permission applied subsite to store 1000 documents in the document library. This site has a set of 50 users. I was able to create content scope and library path for search. It returns results for me(creator/owner/administrator)
    however if I add other users as contributor or full permission, even after full crawling it does not return result for others.
    I saw some article that security broken site wont be indexed normal way and to include and I did that as well but no result for other users. I always get result.
    Please suggest if there are any specific security permissions that I need to include, so the document library target search will return result for others.
    Thanks
    Shri

    Hi Shri,
    For administrator search results, it looks like the documents could be crawled and searched.
    For other users you grant full control permission on subsite with unique permission where you store 1000 dcouments in document library, please make sure these 50 users have access permission(at least view permission) on documents from the
    library, then test again.
    Also test if users search on search center site without search scope, see if it's scope issue or search web part issue.
    If above doesn't work, please check ULS log for related useful information around the time when users search the documents, there should be more info to verify if issue is related to unique permision.
    Thanks,
    Daniel Yang
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • CQWP does not return result for a specific query when filtering on a managed metadata field.

    Hi,
    We are facing a serious production issue. We've search the web extensively but to no avail.
    Problem:
    CQWP does not return result for a specific query when filtering on a managed metadata field.
    ULS log:
    The Uls logs provides 3 different messages that I could relate to every time the query is executed. The last item(level Medium) is displayed 14 times. For readability I've moved the ULS logs to the bottom of this question.
    Query:
    The query is as follows:
    (I've translated this from dutch so pardon any typo's)
    Query: (top selection) Display items from all sites in the site collection
    ListType: Documentlibrary
    Contenttype:
    Items from this group:Custom Document Contenttypes
    Items from this content type: Verklaring
    Filter: Soort is equal to X
    extra info: the field soort (Type) is a managed metadata field that was assigned the value X
    Managed Metadata Structure:
    -managed metadata service
      -Contoso
        -Enterprise Taxonomy (term set)
          -Document (term)
            -Verklaring (term)
              -Soort (term)
                -x (term)
    EXTRA INFO:
    When I modify the filter to filter on Title the CQWP DOES return the correct document!
    When I modify the query settings to search a specific library the CWQP also does return the correct document! (In this case I am filtering on a managed metadata field).
    QUESTION:
    Why doesn't the CQWP return the document when filtering on a managed metadata field over the entire site collection.
    Why does the CQWP return the document when filtering on a managed metadata field over a single library.
    (The type of information the CQWP should return (Soort:x) is stored in a dozen document libraries!)
    Here are the ULS logs.
    Product: Web Content Management
    Category Publishing
    Level: Monitorable:
    CrossListQueryCache::GetSiteData() caught exception (Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: Kan deze actie niet voltooien.  Probeer het opnieuw. ---> System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException (0x80004005): Kan deze actie niet voltooien.  Probeer
    het opnieuw.     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)    
    bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     --- Einde van intern uitzonderingsstackpad
    ---     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleComException(COMException comEx)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery,
    ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.GetSiteData(SPSiteDataQuery query)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetSiteData(SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery
    siteDataQuery, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetCrossListQueryResults(SPSiteDataQuery query, SPWeb currentContext, Boolean onlyPopulateCache, Boolean useSpQueryOnList, Int32 lcid)    
    bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(CachedArea cachedArea, SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery query, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)) for query:  '<ViewFields><FieldRef ID="{fa564e0f-0c70-4ab9-b863-0177e6ddd247}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{94f89715-e097-4e8b-ba79-ea02aa8b7adb}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{1d22ea11-1e32-424e-89ab-9fedbadb6ce1}" Nullable="True"
    Type="Counter"/><FieldRef ID="{28cf69c5-fa48-462a-b5cd-27b6f9d2bd5f}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{1df5e554-ec7e-46a6-901d-d85a3881cb18}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef
    ID="{d31655d1-1d5b-4511-95a1-7a09e9b75bf2}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{30bb605f-5bae-48fe-b4e3-1f81d9772af9}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{ba3c27ee-4791-4867-8821-ff99000bac98}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{c5c4b81c-f1d9-4b43-a6a2-090df32ebb68}" Nullable="True"
    Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{8fca95c0-9b7d-456f-8dae-b41ee2728b85}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{39360f11-34cf-4356-9945-25c44e68dade}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef
    ID="{543bc2cf-1f30-488e-8f25-6fe3b689d9ac}" Nullable="True" Type="Image"/><FieldRef ID="{43bdd51b-3c5b-4e78-90a8-fb2087f71e70}" Nullable="True" Type="Number"/><FieldRef ID="{9da97a8a-1da5-4a77-98d3-4bc10456e700}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Note"/><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef Name="ScopeId" /><FieldRef Name="_Level" /><FieldRef
    Name="UniqueId" /><ListProperty Name="DraftVersionVisibility" /></ViewFields><Lists ServerTemplate="101"></Lists><Webs Scope="Recursive" /><RowLimit>45</RowLimit><Query><Where><And><BeginsWith><FieldRef
    Name="ContentTypeId" Nullable="True" Type="ContentTypeId"/><Value Type="ContentTypeId">0x010100C5FEE83B67FA6445B0C14AE8B7761BB8011E</Value></BeginsWith><In><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}"
    LookupId="TRUE"/><Values><Value Type="Counter">783</Value></Values></In></And></Where><OrderBy><FieldRef ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True"
    Type="DateTime" Ascending="FALSE"/></OrderBy></Query>' at url: /. Titel webonderdeel: Inhoudsquery
    Product: Web Content Management
    Category Publishing
    Level: Warning
    Error occured while processing a Content Query Web Part. Performing the following query '<ViewFields><FieldRef ID="{fa564e0f-0c70-4ab9-b863-0177e6ddd247}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{94f89715-e097-4e8b-ba79-ea02aa8b7adb}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{1d22ea11-1e32-424e-89ab-9fedbadb6ce1}" Nullable="True" Type="Counter"/><FieldRef ID="{28cf69c5-fa48-462a-b5cd-27b6f9d2bd5f}" Nullable="True"
    Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{1df5e554-ec7e-46a6-901d-d85a3881cb18}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef ID="{d31655d1-1d5b-4511-95a1-7a09e9b75bf2}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef
    ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{30bb605f-5bae-48fe-b4e3-1f81d9772af9}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{ba3c27ee-4791-4867-8821-ff99000bac98}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{c5c4b81c-f1d9-4b43-a6a2-090df32ebb68}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{8fca95c0-9b7d-456f-8dae-b41ee2728b85}" Nullable="True"
    Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{39360f11-34cf-4356-9945-25c44e68dade}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{543bc2cf-1f30-488e-8f25-6fe3b689d9ac}" Nullable="True" Type="Image"/><FieldRef
    ID="{43bdd51b-3c5b-4e78-90a8-fb2087f71e70}" Nullable="True" Type="Number"/><FieldRef ID="{9da97a8a-1da5-4a77-98d3-4bc10456e700}" Nullable="True" Type="Note"/><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef Name="ScopeId" /><FieldRef Name="_Level" /><FieldRef Name="UniqueId" /><ListProperty Name="DraftVersionVisibility" /></ViewFields><Lists
    ServerTemplate="101"></Lists><Webs Scope="Recursive" /><RowLimit>45</RowLimit><Query><Where><And><BeginsWith><FieldRef Name="ContentTypeId" Nullable="True" Type="ContentTypeId"/><Value
    Type="ContentTypeId">0x010100C5FEE83B67FA6445B0C14AE8B7761BB8011E</Value></BeginsWith><In><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}" LookupId="TRUE"/><Values><Value Type="Counter">783</Value></Values></In></And></Where><OrderBy><FieldRef
    ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime" Ascending="FALSE"/></OrderBy></Query>' generated the following error: Kan deze actie niet voltooien.  Probeer het opnieuw.
    at the following url: /. Titel webonderdeel: Inhoudsquery
    Kan deze actie niet voltooien. Probeer het opnieuw. This is Dutch. It means something like: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.
    Product: Web Content Management
    Category Publishing
    Level: Medium (this message is displayed 14 times)
    ConsoleUtilies.GetContextualControlMode had no currentPage so the current SPWebPartManager mode cannot be retrieved.

    Hi,
    while digging through the logging (again) I found some extra logging regarding the same correlation id (see details below).
    We have a fairly large term store (4000+ lines).
    If somebody has a clue or tip that would greatly appreciated!
    03-19-2014 13:49:51.87 w3wp.exe (0x2098) 0x23BC SharePoint Foundation Database fa42 Monitorable A large block of literal text was sent to sql.  This can result in blocking in sql and excessive memory use on the front
    end.  Verify that no binary parameters are being passed as literals, and consider breaking up batches into smaller components.  If this request is for a SharePoint list or list item, you may be able to resolve this by reducing the number of fields. 1971313a-6baa-49e9-bace-d024ce67f25c
    03-19-2014 13:49:51.87 w3wp.exe (0x2098) 0x23BC SharePoint Foundation Database fa43 High Slow Query Duration: 127.1515 1971313a-6baa-49e9-bace-d024ce67f25c
    03-19-2014 13:49:51.87 w3wp.exe (0x2098) 0x23BC SharePoint Foundation Database fa44 High Slow Query StackTrace-Managed:    bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SqlSession.OnPostExecuteCommand(SqlCommand command,
    SqlQueryData monitoringData)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SqlSession.ExecuteReader(SqlCommand command, CommandBehavior behavior, SqlQueryData monitoringData, Boolean retryForDeadLock)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSqlClient.ExecuteQueryInternal(Boolean
    retryfordeadlock)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSqlClient.ExecuteQuery(Boolean retryfordeadlock)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String
    bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter
    pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.GetSiteData(SPSiteDataQuery query)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetSiteData(SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery siteDataQuery, Boolean
    useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetCrossListQueryResults(SPSiteDataQuery query, SPWeb currentContext, Boolean onlyPopulateCache, Boolean useSpQueryOnList, Int32 lcid)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(CachedArea
    cachedArea, SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery query, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(CachedArea ca, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(SPSite
    site, String webUrl, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart.IssueQuery()     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart.GetXPathNavigator(String
    viewPath)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.PrepareAndPerformTransform(Boolean bDeferExecuteTransform)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.PerformSelect()    
    bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.DataBind()     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.EnsureDataBound()     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.CreateChildControls()    
    bij System.Web.UI.Control.EnsureChildControls()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()    
    bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean
    includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)     bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)     bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest()    
    bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)     bij ASP.BLANKWEBPARTPAGE_ASPX_1653093133.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.TemplateRedirectionPage.ProcessRequest(HttpContext
    context)     bij System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()     bij System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously)    
    bij System.Web.HttpApplication.PipelineStepManager.ResumeSteps(Exception error)     bij System.Web.HttpApplication.BeginProcessRequestNotification(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb)     bij System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationPrivate(IIS7WorkerRequest
    wr, HttpContext context)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(IntPtr managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(IntPtr
    managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(IntPtr managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32
    flags)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(IntPtr managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags) 1971313a-6baa-49e9-bace-d024ce67f25c

  • Find an item not returning results in SharePoint calendar list

    Environment: SharePoint 2013 upgraded to SP1. We have 1000s of team sites that have been upgraded from 2010 to 2013. In the lists in these sites, quite often I encounter that
    Find an item does not return results for certain fields other than the title field. For example, we have a calendar list which has a Single Line of Text field. I can not get meaningful results searching on
    this field.  I have tried this, no luck:
    http://www.enjoysharepoint.com/Articles/Details/sharepoint-2013-find-an-item-search-box-does-not-return-20956.aspx
    Search service crawls incremental every hour. I hope this does not need a full crawl.
    Thanks, Soumya | MCITP, SharePoint 2010

    Thanks Ganesh. All these settings are as you recommended it to be. Nonetheless I double checked and here are the results:
    Ensure in the Search Service Application that the Web Application is included in the Content Source under SharePoint Start Addresses.
    Yes. Please remember we are getting search results. To be specific we are not getting Find items in the list to be returning accurate results.
    Make sure that the address in Alternate access mappings default text box is same as the start crawl address in the search service application.
    Yes.
    List Setting - Allow items from this list to appear in search results? yes
    Ensured
    set “Require content approval for submitted item?” to “No”.
    It is set to "No". However, will it not work for approved contents also?
    Thanks, Soumya | MCITP, SharePoint 2010

  • Windows 8.1 x64 Smart Search Outlook and OneNote 2013(x32) not returning results

    Is the 8.1 Smart Search([windows-key]-type)  supposed to return results from Outlook and/or OneNote?
    I am using Exchange Cached mode for Outlook if that matters.
    I have done the following to try and get results to show up:
    control panel...Indexing Options...Advanced...File Types...Index Properties and File Contents
    used indexing troubleshooter which found no problems
    control panel...Indexing Options...Advanced...Rebuild...
    used scanpst to scan my ost and make repairs.
    checked and unchecked Outlook and OneNote within index properties
    tried to go to C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Outlook\username.ost properties...advanced...checked allow this file to have contents indexed. Except the next time i start outlook the check mark goes away.
    verified .pst , .ost and .pst files are all in the index service...file types... list
    Search within Outlook itself works just fine and quickly, but i would like to be able to search from the "Smart Search".  File name search is flawless. 
    If it isn't supported, why is it in the indexing options that clearly work for smart search settings because I also added a location for searching where file names search works just fine(although it does seem the contents of excel/word files are
    not being indexed, but the index might still be rebuilding)
    Any help would keep some hair on my head. 
    Thanks

    Hi,
    It seems that the smart search can't search the content in outlook and OneNote.
    blogs.technet.com/b/daanish/archive/2014/03/19/windows-8-101-smart-search.aspx
    The reason why Outlook and OneNote appears in the Index option tab is that Outlook and OneNote need the Windows search to help index the content in Outlook and OneNote, if we remote the outlook and onenote from Index Option tab, the search function in the
    Outlook and OneNote may not works.
    Also, smart search main focus on Settings , files, web Images, web Videos which we can select above the search box.  Another reason we suspect the design for this is the consideration for security, if we can search the emails in the smart search, that
    maybe some programs can access the content in Outlook and OneNote without authentication .
    Hope the information above help.
    Best Regards,
    Jason Zeng

  • 'People Search Core Result' web part with 'office' filter in Keyword Query is not returning results

    I have created a page with "People search core result" web part on SharePoint 2010.
    When I try to use the setting (A) or (C) as shown below, there is no results been returned but when set to setting (B), there are results been returned.
    In the returned results I can see the OfficeNumber field is been populated with values and some of them is "UK Finance".
    Setting (A)
    Result Query Options
    -- Fixed Keyword Query = contentclass:spspeople -- Append Text To Query = Department:"Finance" AND OfficeNumber:"UK Finance"
    Setting (B)
    Result Query Options
    --- Fixed Keyword Query = contentclass:spspeople --- Append Text To Query = Department:"Finance"
    Setting (C)
    Result Query Options
    --- Fixed Keyword Query = contentclass:spspeople --- Append Text To Query = OfficeNumber:"UK Finance"
    What am I doing wrong here? Am I missing something? Do I need any additional configuration in order to get this to work?
    I hope someone could help me or point me to the right direction.
    Thank you
    muges

    You might want to check the Manage User Properties area of the User Profile Service in Central Admin.
    Any properties you query on should be marked "Indexed" or "Use in Scopes".  You can also check that you are using the correct internal name for these properties.

  • Simple RFC call not returning results

    Hi,
    I have created a VERY simple Dynpro project to return the results of a simple RFC.  I've created the JCO connections and they test fine but the RFC doesn't return results to my application.
    Steps:
    1. create the project
    2. import the RFC Adaptive Model specifying the JCO connections
    3. Create an application
    4. Add the rfc model to the "Models Used"
    5. Bind the model to the component
    6. Context map two variables to the view (one input and one output)
    7. Create the method on the component
    8. Bound the UI elements to the model
    9. Set up the JCO connections from http://portal:50000/webdynpro/welcome
    For the JCO Connection creation, I used "Application" type through a load balanced connection for the Model Data connection (WD_MODELDATA_DEST) and the "Dictionary" type for the Metadata connection (WD_RFC_METADATA_DEST).
    Code:
    1. In the wdDoInit() of the controller
    wdContext.nodeZ_Hr_Get_Perno_Input().bind(new Z_Hr_Get_Perno_Input());
    2. In the wdDoInit() of the view
    wdContext.currentContextElement():setLogin_id( "mylogon" );
    wdThis.wdGetRfcTestComponentController().executeZ_Hr_Get_Perno_Input();
    My gut tells me it's an issue with my JCO connections but I can't be sure.
    I'm using Developer Studio SP9 with Patch 1 connecting to EP6 SP9 Patch 6.  When I start the Dev Studio, however, it displays version 2.0.9, is this the same for everyone?
    I've tested the function module from SE37 and it definitely returns a value. Also, if I don't set the login_id in the wdDoInit() before executing, it gives me the error that the input variable has not been set. So, this tells me that it connected to R3 to know that the variable was not passed but it still doesn't return any value when the variable is passed.
    Any ideas??  HELP!!!!!!!!!!
    Thanks,
    Andrew

    Okay, I'm not going crazy.  The issue was with my "simple" rfc.  When I changed the input and output to char(), it returned as expected.  I just have to figure out why the Dictionary types from R3 caused an issue.
    Andrew

  • Vendor Search not returning any values in SRM

    Hi Gurus
    Has any one come accross the following issue? Kindly advice.
    SRM 3.0
    Search Vendor (F4) not returning any value although Vendor exist in SRM (system allows to raise Cart if Requestioner keys in the Vendor Number manually, ie. Vendor has very much got replicated in SRM)
    Steps to replicate the issue
    1) Log on to SRM portal
    2) Expand the Go Shopping and click on Shop (Extended Form)
    3) Click on Create Limit Item
    4) Fill in the Description, Select the Product Category, Enter the Value Limit & Expected Value & fill in the required date
    5) To search for Supplier, click on the find button
    6) In the Find Vendor screen press the start button without entering any restriction
    7) System throws a message "No Vendor found"
    Kind regards,
    Mehul Shah

    Hi Muthu,
    Thanks for replying Muthu.
    Entries do exists in VENMAP.
    No filters are set while searching for Vendor.
    In fact, If I find the Vendor code from ERP and key in the vendor number in the Supplier field in SRM, it rightly picks up the vendor from the Vendor code.
    The only issue is....while I try to search for Supplier using the Supplier search functionality (by clicking on the binocular), the search functionality does not return any values (I put no restriction).
    By the way, Is there any missing Attribute in PPOMA_BBP that may be causing this?
    Regards,
    Mehul.

  • Reports are not returning results in obiee 11g dashboards.

    Hi,
    I have dashboard with 3 reports,i saved my customization of particular date range,product group and target list.When I ran the dashboard for first time,I got all the results for 3 reports in dashboard but from the second time,only one of the reports returned results but other reports are just hanging up.I tried to clear cache in both BI server and presentation services but no use.
    Please help me what steps needs to be done so that all my saved reports return data.

    963277 wrote:
    Hi,
    I have dashboard with 3 reports,i saved my customization of particular date range,product group and target list.When I ran the dashboard for first time,I got all the results for 3 reports in dashboard but from the second time,only one of the reports returned results but other reports are just hanging up.I tried to clear cache in both BI server and presentation services but no use.
    Please help me what steps needs to be done so that all my saved reports return data.Do you know if anything has changed in the database or the RPD from the first time you ran those reports? Did you try running the physical query of the reports against the database to see if you are able to return results quickly?

  • Filter item limits - search not returning any results with large number of elements otherwise ok

    Hi,
    We are working through a problem we've encountered with Azure Search. We are building a filter string based on an "id eq 'xxx' or id eq 'ccc' or id eq 'vvv' etc. The id's are provided in a collection and we loop through, building the string until it's
    ready to apply.
    We are using 2015-02-28 preview at the moment.
    We are encountering a situation where, after approximately 20 id's Azure Search doesn't return any results, nor does it appear to return any error code. I'm pretty sure that the url length is less than 8K.
    Is there any limit on the number of filter elements in a query?

    We followed up offline.
    The symptom in this case was a 200 response with no body. The underlying cause is a URL parsing bug that tries to interpret colons in the query string as the delimiter of a URL scheme (like https:), but with a hard length limit of 1KB. We will work
    on a fix for both the underlying URL parsing issue and the issue that caused it to surface as a body-less 200.
    In the meantime, the workaround is to put colons as close to the beginning of the URL query string as possible. Specifically, putting $filter and facets first, and putting expressions with colons within those first, will mitigate this in most cases.
    Note that the .NET SDK puts $filter and facets near the beginning of the query string by default, so if you're consuming Azure Search you might want to give it a try:
    http://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.Azure.Search/

  • Search not returning desired result

    I am looking for a message in the Application Server/Portal Applications forum with the title "created new fields in form". I know this is the title because I printed out the message a while back.
    I wanted to go back to it to see if any further posts had been made. When I type the title in the search field, I get some hits, but not the message I am looking for.
    Can someone else try using the above search string and check to see if it gets returned?
    Thanks!

    My wife has been having this same problem for at least 6 months (Leopard and Snow Leopard). I tried the "Rebuild" mailbox option, and I have tried adding/removing the User/Library folder from Spotlight privacy to force a re-index. So far nothing. Does anyone have a clue? My wife uses her Mac for work, and searching through e-mail is a common task of hers. This has made her life extremely difficult.

  • Search not returning all results

    I'm having a problem with searching a RAID volume on an G5 Xserve running 10.5.7. It doesn't seem to be returning search results correctly. I've tested it by making folders and searching for them over the course of several days, but haven't been able to find them again by file name. I've tried erasing the index file using the mdutil -E, but it hasn't helped. Any one have any ideas?

    Hi
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9194446&#9194446
    Tony

  • Search not returning all 10 results per page

    Anyone seen this?
    When i do a search, i don't get all 10 per page...
    "Results from your search: 1055. Showing: 1-7."
    however, when i hit 'next'
    "Results from your search: 1055. Showing: 11-16."
    why aren't i seeing 8, 9 17, 18, 19....etc?
    6.1 portal

    out of the box.
    i'm hoping to dodge this issue because i'm upgrading to a new environment in a few weeks hopefully where the search index is rebuilt.

  • Search not returning all entries

    We destroyed our search nodes and cluster on the filesystem in one of our environments and have been working with support to get them back to life. We got the node to startup and we can now search for items without getting a "cant contact search server" error. But we are not seeing enough items in the results.
    We tried setting status to 4 in PTSEARCHSTATUS and PTCARDSTATUS and then running a search repair and search update. After doing this, the cards (documents) can be found but only some of the objects such as the portlets are being returned. The search update flipped the status column to a 1 on some items but not all. Communities and community pages are not showing up but portlets are.
    Any ideas?

    Its working now.
    It turns out that the magic number for the PTSEARCHSTATUS table's status column is 1. PTCARDSTATUS takes a 4.
    After setting this and running search update (no repair needed) all admin objects were reindexed.

  • RH10 - Search not producing results for some users

    I am using RH10 and the help system is stored on a sharepoint server (it was output as WebHelp)
    All users are able to access the system once we give them access, but when they go to search for topics, some get results and some don't. I believe it's related to java, but I can't find any documentation on what version of java is required for end users?
    I have already uninstalled and reinstalled RH (as read in some of the forums) with no changes for the end users.
    Are their other outputs that don't require java for searching?
    Anything else I can test?
    Other information that would be helpful to share?
    Thanks!
    Laura
    (Moved this from the wrong forum -- sorry :-) )

    We installed the patch and did a fresh upload and still have the same problems.
    I was finally able to get the error information, but it doesn't seem to help me with troubleshooting. Any other suggestions are certainly welcome.
    'Node' is undefined
    whfhost.js
    Line:3243
    (it says this a few times and then it adds char:2)
    That line of code is
    function _getWordMatchType( a_Word, a_Tile, a_nPosition, a_nOffset )
    The "waiting on" referred to in the next comment is the whfbody.thm file
    The error was moving so quickly in the bottom left corner that I wasn't able to capture it in full, but it was "waiting on wh... <something>" -- I couldn't ever see what the entire name of the file it was waiting on was. I have limited time with the end users and have not been able to recreate in my environment unfortunately (even though I am using a similar set up as some).
    If I search either the whfbody or whfhost in the message board archives, I come up with several instances where people have had similar issues, but there do not appear to be any fixes.
    I am able to search whether I have enabled mode checked or unchecked, so I am not sure that works for us either.
    Any other suggestions?
    Thanks,
    Laura

Maybe you are looking for