FX5800

Umm, I just installed a newly bought MSI FX5800. I noticed games were not running all that much better than with my MSI Ti4800 so I installed PowerStrip and it says my core/memory timings are 300/600. They should be 400/800! There is no FX5800 that runs at 300/600 right? Is it safe to "overclock" it to 400/800 since thats what it should be running at anyway?? Sigh, Thanks

GeForce FX 5800/5900 uses two modes. In 2D mode it is clocked 300/600 and in 3D mode it is Clocked 400/800 or above according to type. As i tested GF FX5800 i can remember following reasons:
1) You didn't plug external power suply to the card. In this case 3D mode is not inicialized.
2) You are playing games which cannot utilize power of GF FX5800 and/or your CPU is not fast enought to make significant difference.
3) Perofrmance of GF FX5800 is significant higher in games using DirectX 9.0 and/or high resolutions with AA/AF enabled. If you are usinf low resolution and no special features of GF FX5800, real performance could not be bette in these aplications.

Similar Messages

  • Nvidia gtx 480 or quadro fx5800

    Hi,
    I already have a nvidia quadro FX5800 & a Nvidia gtx 285 2gb, is it worth keeping these cards for CS5 or is it Best to invest in a GTX480.
    i am in the middle of building a new machine soon. and would be good to get some advise.
    Baz

    Baz,
    With the two cards you have, especially the 5800, it seems better to await certification and the appearance of the first benchmarks to decide whether a 480 would be advisable. Also keep in mind that the new line of Quadro's may be announced in June and these will be based on the Fermi architecture.
    My advise is to wait. You can use MPE without limitations on the 5800 and with limitations on the 285.

  • 480GTX or FX5800?  Help decide.

    So I'm building a new system that will be optimized for CS5 but will still need to do the day-to-day work of a home office desktop.  I'm hung up on the graphics card choice.  Both the 480GTX and the FX5800 are on the CUDA GPU list (http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_gpus.html) but only the FX5800 is officially supported by CS5 right now.  This thread (http://forums.adobe.com/message/2790125) makes it seem like a very simple hack to get CS5 running with the 480GTX and there is some opinion that native support for more cards is just a matter of time.
    While it seems like a straight forward decision to get the FX5800 card for known support the fact that this will be my only workstation at home and I may want to play a game like StarcraftII or DiabloIII when they come out means I need a card that can be the "mullet" of graphics cards (business in the front, party/gaming in the back) and brings me back to the 480GTX as I've been told that the FX5800 won't support games at all.
    If we assume that the 480GTX will eventually receive native support, does the 480GTX offer better/worse render power in terms of amount of video layers, number of effects when compared to the FX5800?
    Thanks in advance,

    Harm ?
    I remember Denis saying that CS5 was not going to support SLI months back.
    Have you read or heard any reason why they dont do SLI ?
    I wonder if they tried it and it wasnt worth it or just to hard to implement.
    I dont play games so I never ran any cards in SLI but it does work for games.
    On a side note:  Your scores on the PPBM ( 14.8 ) are looking great with the new 480GTX.
    I cant wait till they officially approve the card and see if that changes your time to even faster.
    ENjoy:  Glenn

  • MSI FX5800 Ultra-TD8X or wait for NV35?

    I am building a super computer and would like to purchase the MSI FX5800 Ultra-TD8X (nVIDIA GeForceFX Ti 5800 Ultra).
    Problem is that they seem non-existant!?!?
    How can i find this card from MSI????
    or
    should I just wait for MSI's version of the NV35 (nVIDIA GeForceFX Ti 11600)? I hear its coming out mid May 2003.
    Can anyone help??

    I'll say... Wait for NV35 as FX5800 Ultra has been said by alot of articles where they and me has agreed on the heating issues of FX5800 Ultra... and driver performance difference also. By the way... its a big loser to Radeon 9800 Pro and small loser to Radeon 9700 Pro and 9500 Pro, at 1st I also thought that FX5800 Ultra will be Radeon 9800 Pro biggest competitor but I'm wrong... NV35 will be up next for the competition of 9600Pro/ 9800Pro and 9900Pro by ATI Sapphire.
    All the Best... :D!!!

  • Need MSI GF FX5800 bios!!!

    I have a problem with my MSI GF FX5800 pcb 1.0 bios   X( , i need to reflash it but i can´t find it anywhere... could someone please help  ;(

    I have forwarded this thread to my contact to ask for the original BIOS.
    I take it you used live update to flash it the first time?
    If not, how then did you get the BIOS update?
    And why did you decide to update the BIOS?

  • Bridge Issue:  CS6 Unresponsive, how to make it respond?

    2 second lag after clicking on any menu item. 
    4-8 second lag after right clicking on any image. 
    3 second lag while selecting images with arrow keys.
    2 second lag selecting multiple images
    My system is high performance:
    . 12 Core 3.3Ghz Xeon Processors
    . 24GB RAM
    . Primary drive is 8 SSDs in a RAID0 configuration
    . Dual nVidia Quadro FX5400
    . OS: Win7 x64
    CS5 and CS5.5 were very “snappy” in responsiveness on this system.  CS6 Bridge works fine on my laptop, perfectly responsive.
    Once Camera RAW or Photoshop are open, no issue working in these tools, so, the issue is bridge.
    Here’s my debugging steps which have not worked to fix the issue:
    Installed the latest camera RAW plug in from Nikon.  Nikon D800 RAW .NEF files work in windows explorer and in CS5.5.
    Installed all windows updates
    Installed the lastest nvidia FX5800 card drivers
    Uninstalled all Adobe products (reader, media player, etc.)
    Uninstalled all plugs ins (HDR, noise, etc.)
    Checked there are no fonts on the system (no TTF files)
    Uninstalled Office 2013 to make sure there were no system font issues.
    Uninstalled all Nikon software except the RAW plug in.
    Deleted C:\Program Files\Adobe and C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe
    Searched for any Adobe reference in c:\Users\<my_username>\ (example AppData), and deleted it.
    Cleaned the registry of any reference to Adobe or any dll related to Adobe or an Adobe plug in.
    Rebooted multiple times.
    Re-installed CS6 Master Collection.  At this point it did not recognize my raw photos (.NEF from a Nikon D800).
    Installed all Adobe Updates.
    The updates fixed the camera raw issue
    Ran FontTest.jsx – all fonts passed, none failed.
    Tried Preferences:
    Advanced -> Use Software Rendering : CPU utilization went up, but, no impact on the lag
    Startup Scripts : Disabled all but Photoshop CS6
    Increased Cache Size, Compacted Cache, Purged Cache, Different Cache organizations, etc.
    Does anyone know how to fix this
    bob

    I talked to support on Thursday and was told that someone would call within 3 days.
    Of course no-one did. Adobe have gotten too big and when that happens support becomes bad, very bad.
    The last problem I had with bridge was all the 'file type associations' were lost. I thought being a paying customer I will call on their help. Again Crap support, kept telling me the same thing set each one up individually. In the end I found a registry hack that sorted the problem out.
    I’m all up for being legal and pay a lot of money on software making sure I am but I do understand that when a large company offers such bad support why people start thinking why pay.
    Surely part of the Cloud subscription I pay should enable me to get support others who use the software illegally don’t get. Of course in reality I don’t. I don’t get any useful support.
    I have to repeat myself for every department, wait around for calls that never come and hunt the forums for people who seem to do better jobs in informing others of how to solve problems.
    I will keep updated on the problem as I know more. I will also like anyone else who is having to problem to message here.

  • I am trying to get better playback rendering speed Premiere CS6

    I am new to Adobe Premiere CS6.  I am trying to get faster playback rendering speed from my machine.
    Windows 7
    i7 4790K Haswell overclocked to 4.5 (watercooled with Corsair)
    16 GB DDR3@799MHz
    Asus Z87-WS (4 double graphic card slots)
    Geforce GTX 760 (Primary)  GPU hardware acceleration enabled
    Quadro FX5800
    250GB Samsung solid state C: (Windows and Adobe)
    250GB Crucial solid state (Scratch)
    2TB Seagate 7200RPM (video files)
    3TB Seagate 7200RPM (storage)
    Seasonic 1000watt PSU
    I am primarily editing GoPro videos with effects like TimeWarp or Twixtor and color correction.
    I have tried to run the PPBM6 program with no success. I kept getting failure to access files.
    I have been looking at adding a second GTX760 with SLI so they will work together.  And possible removing the Quadro if it is slowing things down.
    Any advice would be appreciated.  Thanks!

    ...are you SURE your 760 GPU is "enabled" by PPro, and giving you the option of "Mercury Playback Acceleration" under  "General Preferences" ??? If the "Mercury Acceleration" is GREYED OUT and limits you to "software Only", go to Studio 1 website and learn to apply the well known "hack" to enable your 760 in PPro,OR, download their simple program to do it for you.
    ...Your machine is POWERFUL....especially with your CPU overclock......you MAY want to increase your memory to 32 GB if you are using After Effects....even PPro MAY run better with 32 GB, depending on your workflow.....most systems like yours have at LEAST 32GB system memory.
    .....The GoPro codec is natively HIGHLY COMPRESSED and difficult to process, even for beefy machines. That is why they provide the free Cineform tool,( which used to be an expensive professional editing codec), to convert some,or,all of your footage to a more "edit friendly" AVI codec, which will FLY on your machine. HOWEVER, those new AVI files are HUGE.....TRIPLE the original size and requiring a LARGE and FAST disk transfer system. Right now, your single 7200 drive for your media is your SLOWEST component in the chain. The CHEAPEST improvement for you would be to add another MATCHING 2TB 7,200 rpm drive to your existing one and then use the 2 drives to create a fast RAID 0 directly off the mother board to improve the speed of your "media drive". THEN, you MUST insure that this RAID 0 is DILIGENTLY BACKED UP in case of a drive failure in the RAID. This ALSO means you must protect against an unexpected power failure which could destroy the RAID data if the failure happened during a critical write operation.....so,a good UPS is required.
    You can OBSERVE how the various components in your system are performing while performing strenuous tasks by bringing up the "task manager" window and watching the CPU load.... if all cores are PEGGED at near 100%, you are "CPU bound". As you are ALREADY overclocked, you can't do anything other than to TRANSCODE your footage to the free Cineform. Your ENABLED GPU can be observed....real time....using the free MSI Afterburner,( or, similar).  Certain operations are accelerated by the GPU with PPro....not ALL!!  Scaling and some effects will use use the "Mercury Acceleration" while rendering previews AND during export.In some cases, rendering previews,or, exporting can be sped up by TEN TIMES by Mercury Acceleration. Watch the "GPU Usage" on Afterburner to see if the GPU is indeed being used, and if you are "saturating" it to its capacity of 100% with accelerated effects.
    Make sure your Windows is fully updated to the current time........make sure your NVidia 760 has the most recent driver and DON'T use the Quadro for now. Set your "Windows page file" to be STATIC on your "C" drive at 24GB. Disable "Hibernation" Set all drives NOT to allow "indexing". Do NOT allow any spinning HDD to be over 50% filled....performance WILL decrease.....make sure any HDD is defragged,( do NOT defrag an SSD ! ). Stop all unnecessary processes, esp. anti-virus programs, while editing. Find out how to best "tune" windows to speed it up at the PPBM 6 and 7 websites.
    BE AWARE that the "run of the mill" SSDs use cheaper Sandforce controllers, and are less suited to handle highly compressed digital video files. Samsung PRO models and recent Crucial M550 series SSDs ONLY are recommended for video use. Both these non-Sandforce SSDs maintain high WRITE speeds,( over 400MB/sec), AND maintain their high speeds after reaching their "steady state" condition. Cheaper EVO series and non-Marvell controlled SSDs MAY lose their fast write speeds over time and SLOW YOU WAY DOWN !!!  Test your current SSDs by transferring large video files between them  and watching MB per second that appears under "details" in the pop up window during transfer. Make sure none are slow.....test them with HD Tune Pro as well.
    Certain non-Adobe plug-ins and certain effects may NOT use all the CPU threads well,or, may not use the GPU.....forcing the CPU to do additional work. You will have to identify problem plug-ins,or, effects by switching them on and off to see if any cripple your system.
    Your machine is POWERFUL.....go to PPBM7 website and read the "tweakers" page to learn more....then, register for free and TEST your machine with their video benchmark test for PPro. It should do WELL.....AND it will help identify if you have any "bottlenecks" which are impairing your system.
    Good Luck !!!!!.....THEN, start using CC 2014.....like Patton said : "...all glory is FLEETING !!"......so is the lifespan of former PPro versions !!!!!!

  • Why is CS6 so much slower than CS5 was

    Setup: Sager laptop NP8760 - CPU: QuadCore Intel Core i7 820QM, 2648 MHz (20 x 132)
                                                         8GB ram running win 7 64 bit
    I've found that trying to use the CS6 (cloud) version of Adobe bridge is not really possible unless you don't mind having 4-8 second pauses for nearly any use.  Right clicking for any reason is guaranteed to cause a good 5 second wait to see the right click menu. The first click on any menu bar item also gauranteed to cause a 5-8 second wait.  Repeatedly (happens whenever focus leaves bridge, no matter how momentary)
    Of course if you are intent on working with your images you can't really put up with that much delay.
    I end up using CS5 bridge with CS6 photoshop or any of the other CS6 tools, but some things are then impossible to do from bridge, to me the worst one is not being able to send selections of images thru the photoshop image processor.  I have to start CS6 bridge and put up with its incredible contrariness to do that job.
    Something that was done to bridge between CS5 and CS6 seems to be the likely place to look for the solution to this problem, but while I can read the lsted changes I don't know enough to be able to tell which might be responsible or what I can do about it.
    My hardware is nothing breath taking but should be well adequate to run Bridge... especially when I've carefully turned off any other application that I am using.
    I've noticed lots of talk here of redoing cache and moving cache etc.  My cache is on a different disk than the program and I've purged it a time or two to make sure that wasn't the problem. 
    I've made no customizations to bridge so it should be installed all vanilla.

    I have the same issue.  Customer chat has not been able to resolve.
    :  CS6 Unresponsive.
    2 second lag after clicking on any menu item. 
    4-8 second lag after right clicking on any image. 
    3 second lag while selecting images with arrow keys.
    2 second lag selecting multiple images
    My system is high performance:
    . 12 Core 3.3Ghz Xeon Processors
    . 24GB RAM
    . Primary drive is 8 SSDs in a RAID0 configuration
    . Dual nVidia Quadro FX5400
    . OS: Win7 x64
    CS5 and CS5.5 were very “snappy” in responsiveness on this system.  CS6 Bridge works fine on my laptop, perfectly responsive.
    Once Camera RAW or Photoshop are open, no issue working in these tools, so, the issue is bridge.
    Here’s my debugging steps which have not worked to fix the issue:
    Installed the latest camera RAW plug in from Nikon.  Nikon D800 RAW .NEF files work in windows explorer and in CS5.5.
    Installed all windows updates
    Installed the lastest nvidia FX5800 card drivers
    Uninstalled all Adobe products (reader, media player, etc.)
    Uninstalled all plugs ins (HDR, noise, etc.)
    Checked there are no fonts on the system (no TTF files)
    Uninstalled Office 2013 to make sure there were no system font issues.
    Uninstalled all Nikon software except the RAW plug in.
    Deleted C:\Program Files\Adobe and C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe
    Searched for any Adobe reference in c:\Users\<my_username>\ (example AppData), and deleted it.
    Cleaned the registry of any reference to Adobe or any dll related to Adobe or an Adobe plug in.
    Rebooted multiple times.
    Re-installed CS6 Master Collection.  At this point it did not recognize my raw photos (.NEF from a Nikon D800).
    Installed all Adobe Updates.
    The updates fixed the camera raw issue
    Ran FontTest.jsx – all fonts passed, none failed.
    Tried Preferences:
    Advanced -> Use Software Rendering : CPU utilization went up, but, no impact on the lag
    Startup Scripts : Disabled all but Photoshop CS6
    Increased Cache Size, Compacted Cache, Purged Cache, Different Cache organizations, etc.
    bob

  • FX5600 or G4 Ti 4600

    Right i am doing me nut in here, wanting to upgrade my Geforce 3 Ti 200 128mb but really have no clue to what.
    Was all ready to get a FX5600 256mb but now here the FX cards are slower then the Ti4600's etc.
    Who can clarify this for me as i have not got a clue.
    Both cards cost about the same here in the Netherlands.
    any tips, pro's & con's for both might help sway me.
    Which of the 2 would be the best to get ? a newish FX5600 or a G4 Ti 4600.
    can't afford a FX5800/5900 or the Ti 4800 ;(.

    dunno but below are the prices here in the Netherlands,
    Thanx now i really dunno what to get had choice of 2 till u had to sat Ti4800                    
    Club3D GeForce4 Ti4600 128DDR DVI/TVOut       € 210,-
    Club3D GeForce4 Ti4800SE 128DDR DVI/TVO       € 180,-
    Club3D GeForceFX 5600 256MB DDR2 DVI/TV-Out   € 172,-
    Ti 4600 cost most which is wierd.
    Ok people who as experience with above cards?
    I need to know before my 40th birthday in 5 days.

  • Hardware config and componenets : raid, gpu and monitor choices

    Right,
    I've almost finalised my decisions about a new build I'm putting together to use cs4 design premium prgrammes (mainly photoshop, InDesign, Illustrator, fireworks and flash) and in the near future 3d Max and possibly a video editing programme.
    There are some things I'm stuck with for now; Motherboard and cpu, and some things I have a few questions about: raid 0,  gpu and monitor choices.  I appreciate this is a long post - but any feed-back would be appreciated.
    MOTHERBOARD AND CPU
    The motherboard and cpu were originally intended for a gaming pc:
    MSI DKA790GX Platinum Motherboard
    AMD phenom x4 9950 black edition
    This motherboard and cpu are far better than any other  I've had at my disposal when it has come to working with  adobe programmes (CS2).  So although
    - I will only be able to go up to 8gb of ddr2  800mhtz ram (apparently the motherbioard  becomes unstable with 8 gb 1066 ddr2)
    - I  do not have a motherboard that takes 2  6+ core cpus
    From what I've seen of reviews on these components, at the moment,  I'm quite happy with what I've got for both cs4 and 3d max use.
    Besides, in the last few weeks I've learnt there are other things I can do to get maximum leverage out of a build comprising  these components.
    HDD CHOICE FOR RAID 0
    I've read Harms generic guideline for disk setup here
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/662972?start=0&tstart=0
    I gather that this guide is principally for optimum running when video editing. But I also gather that the performance enhancement of raid 0 compared to no raid will be beneficial for both  photoshop and 3d Max.  4 discs with 2 in raid is what I was thinking of going for.
    Discs I have or am thinking of buying:
    1.  I have 1 160gb WD ide 8mb cache hdd WD1600AAJB
    2.  I have 1 500gb WD Caviar blue SATA 16 mb cache hdd (WD500AAKS)
    3.  For the raid I'm thinking of buying 2x 1tb Samsung SpinPoint F3 7200rpm 32mb cache drives for £45.74 each
    These are obviously highly rated as raid drives in these forums and I can't find anything smallar than a 1tb version of these drives at the shop I plan to order from – or is 1tb all they come in?
    1st disc for OS and programmes
    When going to the trouble of setting up raid is it acceptable to use an ide disc for the OS and programmes? I ask this because the 160gb WD hdd mentioned above has hardly been used....
    If the ide drive is not approved of  I'm thinking of buying either
    1.  A 500gb Seagate Barcude 7200.12 16mb cache sata 2 drive for £29.73 or
    2.  A 500gb Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 7200rpm 16mb cache driver for £29.30 or
    3.  A  160gb samsung SpinPoint 7200rpm 8mb cache drive for 24.96
    I know the Seagate and Hitachi  are huge drives for the principal purpose of storing the OS and programmes but they both have 16mb cache and are only a few pounds more than the 160gb Samsung drive with only 8mb cache
    Or
    considering I'm going for F3 spinpoint for the raid discs would it be better, in terms of compatibility between the drives, to go for a spinpoint 8mb cache for the OS and programme discs
    What should be my biggest concern here – compatibility between the discs or a higher cache on the disc  - or considering they are all the same speed (7200rpm) does the cache not matter that much?
    2nd disc for page file, media cache
    I was thinking of dedicating the 500gb WD I have for these purposes.  I've read in this forum that the WD drives are not that reliable when it comes to raid arrays – apart from that they seem to have a good reputation.
    3-4th discs for raid 0
    My mind is pretty much made up on the Samsung SpinPoint F3's
    Partitions
    Because there are a huge number of gb's in this set up I'm thinking of  partioning the 1st and second discs so that in addition to using them for 'the operating system and programme files' and 'page file and media cache' their second partitions can be used to backup the data stored in the raid array.
    Is it good practice to partition dedicated discs in this way?
    THE GPU
    Due to it's reletive cheapness, wide spread use and endorsement amongst gamers and workstation users alike, first of all I was swayed towards the 480GTX and using quadro driver hacks.  But I couldn't get the number of ''risk factor' forum threads concerning making a GTX think its a quadro – particularly when it comes to using 3d max - out of my head.  Even without the hacks there are a high percentage of grissly stories out there concerning the 480s and 3d max compared to workstation cards and 3d max.  So I've decided that because I have the budget to get a workstation card (an ATI V7800) for 'just' £134 more than a GTX480 (£424 compared to £293) then for the peace of mind of more stable drivers, when getting to grips with a complex new programme, I might as well go for it and pay that bit extra.
    I've had a good look at both the ATI V7800 and the PNY QUADRO 4000.... the differences between stream versus cuda and how these cards perform when rendering 3d programmes.....  I  started vearing towards the V7800 when I realised that when it came to rendering it was being compared very favourably with the quadro FX5800 let a lone the much cheaper quadro 4000.... Plus with the disc set up I am now thinking of I can buy the V7800 plus all the discs talked about above for £10 less than I can find the quadro 4000 for alone.
    The only thing I'm concerned about is the V7800's compatibility with the cs4 design premium suite.
    This page indicates that although some of these cards were released after cs4 they are supported by it.
    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/405/kb405445.html
    Would it be wrong of me to suppose that, because the new V7800 is a work station graphics card, it will  be supported by cs4?
    What difference will it make if it isn't supported?
    Having said that the quadro 4000 isn't listed as supported on this page either....
    What would be your choice between the quadro 4000 and ATI V7800?
    THE MONITOR
    The monitor I'm looking at the 22” Dell 2209WA  eIPS..... Although older (2008 vs 2009) the slightly larger 24”Dell 2408WFP has also caught my eye due to the higher contrast ratio (1300:1 vs 1000:1) and that this increased contrast ratio means it is capable of displaying 110 percent of the NTSC gamut as opposed to 86% with the the 2209WA.
    I'm familiar with monitor on the 2006 dell XPS M1710  laptop and am very impressed with colour fidelity.  The 2408WFP does require more calibration tweaking by the sound of it....
    Anyone any experince of either of these monitors?
    I'm off to the gym for an hour or so - I'll be back in a couple of hours

    My strong advice:  Don't skimp on price on hard drives.
    Get high MTBF RAID edition drives (e.g., Western Digital RE-series drives).
    http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=30
    In my main workstation I currently have two 1 TB WD RE3 drives that have been spinning in a RAID 0 configuration 24/7 with ZERO problems for a year now.
    I figure one wants to minimize the chance of losing one's data down the road.  How much would it cost you in time, effort, and lost work to recover your data from a backup if you should lose your hard drive?
    Top-end drives can fail, sure, but the MTBF numbers say that the chances are much smaller than with "cheap" drives.  And the RAID edition drives have additional features, such as vibration reduction, that differentiates them from lesser drives.
    Ask yourself, why would one drive be cheaper than another?  Poorer quality materials?  Not as much quality control?
    Another bit of info:  Search this forum for "quadro".  It seems that these expensive video cards may be seeing more trouble with Photoshop than you might expect.  Some of the less expensive cards, that may have had more OpenGL testing (e.g., to support gaming) might be better choices for use with Photoshop.  Personally I prefer ATI.
    -Noel

  • Media Encoder Hangs on File Import and Playback

    Media Encode Hangs on launch (extremely slow not normal).  When I drag and drop a file it hangs or using file import it hangs. Encodes that should only take a few minutes are listed as 1 hour.
    I use media encoder all the time it does not perform like this!  Anyone else experiencing these problems?
    Thanks,
    System Info
    Z800 8 core 12Gig Memory Nividia FX5800 Adobe CC Suite lastest updates. (Media Encoder 7.2)

    Still experiencing unexpected behaviour when drag and droping files into project window.  I have draged the same file sometimes it loads instantly other times it takes as much as 3 minutes to load.  The file size is 354 mb.  No other programs are running.  Anyone have similar behaviour?

  • Mercury: GTX 265 limitations vs Quadro?

    On this NVidia Blog here:
    http://blogs.nvidia.com/ntersect/2010/02/nvidia-quadro-driving-adobes-new-mercury-playback -engine.html
    The author, in replying to a comment, states:
    "•Specifically with the Mercury Playback Engine, when working with more than three layers, only Quadro will accelerate the entire project on the GPU. GeForce products will only accelerate layers 1 – 3, with any additional computation falling back to the CPU."
    Can Dennis or anyone else from Adobe confirm that this is true? If so, is this due to the amount of memory on the GPU, or what?
    Cheers
    Mark

    From a discussion I had at the Adobe Road Show about a year ago, the real limitation is not the amount of memory, but the number of cores or streams.
    The 265 has 216, the 275 and 285 have 240 and the 295 has 480 (dual GPU). But it can't be simply that because the Quadro FX4800 ($1500) only has 192 and the FX5800 ($3000) has 240.  Interesting question.

  • Msi kt6 delta lsr temp problem?

    i have just installed a msi kt6 delta lsr , but when i have ran the system a while the sys temp is around 40-42 c and the cpu temp is around 52c .
    on my old mobo the temps never went above 35c for the cpu and 25c for the sys temp .
    my specs for old mobo etc =
    AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+
    jetway v400db (kt400 chipset)
    400w psu
    ata133 80gb hd (maxtor)
    512 ddr333
    geforce fx5800 ultra
    windows me (but same in win xp pro)
    2 fans blowing air into case and 2 sucking air out
    does anybody know a way to improve the temps please

    Yippee! A ME user, like me! You know I guess MS support for W98 and ME has been prolonged til 2006? It has partly to do with Linux.
    The temperature for the CPU is a little high, but not alarmingly so. Barton gets a little bit hotter on these boards, and I think it is the placing belovw the PSU that is the cause. The system temperature for you is no problem.
    To get the warmth away from the CPU I suggest a fan placed in the case door/side, that sucks it out.
    Perhaps you have not got such a case door? Then I suggest a quiet 80 mm fan on the back of the case as high as possible, again sucking air out in order to make a nice air flow. Another suggestion is to tie away cabling to the sides of the case as much as possible, power cables, IDE cables etc.

  • I have answers to the 6800series cards being differant

    Evening now then   ive got an answer to u poor people who have got the 6800GT and the standard HSF   well if u look deeper into the cards ull find that the GEFORCE 6800GT t2d256E has a red pcb with a copper heat sink. This is what it should be like these are the final versions as the 6800GT t2d256E is a recent model. as mor proof i have just bought one and my GT is the proper msi one with doom 3 red P.C.B and a copper heatsink and is perfect. well so far.. hope this helps. by the way thanks msi for letting me have a red copper one   i owe YOU one

    Not really an answer
    This is nothing new, most early versions of nVidia cards are not made by any vendors at all. nVidia contract manufactures them and sends them to vendors until a set point in time. Primarily to maintain QC, but in this case, because of GDDR3 yield problems, and high demand, perhaps QC at the fab may have been compromised.
    The FX5800 series was basically the same scenario.
    That is partially the reason why there were problems with the heatsink causing problems. This was not only MSI that had problems like this.
    ATI is the same way, but even moreso.

  • Impossible d'installer Creative Suite Master Collection CS6

    Bonjour,
    Après avoir assemblé un ordinateur dédié à la création de'application de systèmes d'analyses d'images pour contrôle qualitéindustriel, j'ai acquis le Full creative Suite Master ccollection CS6.
    Mon ordinateur principale comprend:
    Boîtier Lian-Li PC-2120
    Alimentation Corsair AX1200 Watts
    Windows 7 Pro SP1 dernière version FR
    Carte ASUS P9X79 Deluxe (dernière version BIOS 1203)
    Processeur Intel Core i7 - 3960X (LGA 2011 à 3,3GHz)
    Refroidisseur Noctua NH-C14
    Mémoires G.Skill F3 - 17000CL11Q2 - 32GBZL
    Carte SSD OCZ RevoDrive3 x2 PCI - E: 480Go
    Carte graphique nVIDIA Quadro FX5800
    Lecteur DVDR Plextor PX-L890SA
    Lecteur BD-R (Bly-Ray) PX-LB950SA
    Deux disques durs internes 1To SATA 6Go/sec
    Deux Disques extenes 2To (RAID 1) non actif pour le moment.
    Utilsant le DVD Application 1, le lecteur prend énormément de temps pour déscompresser (OK = 5,48Go compressés).
    Puis également énormémnt de temps pour Initialiser l'installation (10 minures !)
    Puis, après avoir sélectionner le tout, introduit la clé d'activation, le système démare l'installation et prévent avoir besopin de 20 minutes !
    Après être arrivé à 13% de ;l'installation...le système blocque (?) plus de lecture du DVD, le lecteur étant arrêté ?
    J'ai essayé plusieurs fois, sans succès.
    Je suis parvenu à copier le contenu complet des deux DVD d'installation sur un disque dur interne, j'ouvre le dossier du disque Application 1, clicque sur Set-Up et immédiatement suis invité à poursuivre.
    Et là... le même problème, l'installation s'arrête arrivée à 13% ???
    Une fois décompressé, l'application 1 propose 14Go de fichiers !
    Y a t'il un moyen d'obtenir un contact avec un expert de chez Adobe ? car pour vendre...pas de problèmes, mais pour contacter !!!
    Merci de me le faire savoir, et si vous avez une idée 'positive', je suis preneur;
    salutations,
    Jean

    Bonjour,
    J'ai "désinstallé" la majorité de mes applications, et redémarré en mode save avec connexion réseau sous Windows 7 Pro SP1 (sans mises à jour) ! car j'ai téléchargé toutes les mises à jour sur un autre ordianteur...
    Près de 200 mises à jour ??? dingue !
    Urilisant les deux DVD Adobe Master Collection, après l'initialisation du programme Installation, le système démare, et... s'arrête à 13% ?
    Cette fois, j'attend quelque minutes...et le lecter clingote 3-4 fois et redémare ! Jusqu'à la demande du disque Application 2
    Et tout s'installe ENFIN !
    Reste le Visual Studio Pro qui a les mêmes problèmes, (assez lourd aussi) tout ça du à un système Windows qui n'esy pas un Système d'Exploitation, mais une Application avec un système d'Exploitation inclus !!!
    Et 80 % de dossiers et fichiers obsolètes ! Juste bon pour causer des conflits !
    Exemple: Quel est l'utilité de disposer de plus de 800 Fonts (plus sous fichiers) ?
    Et le comble, plusieurs Fonts ne sont même pas désinstallable (défendu !!!) par le Mr disposant du pouvoir !
    Que faire de tout ces Fonts arabes ???
    Et que faire de ces milliers de milotes ? alors que chaque équipement est livré avec pilote approprié ???
    Ah la belle époque du DOS5 et DOS6 AUCUN problème a cette époque, et utilisant C/C++, après une compilation d'un projet de plusieurs milliers de lignes, le fichier *.exe occupait 300 à 400 kilo-octets !
    Aujourd'hui, je me dois d'utiliser un DVD, et bientôt...un Bly-Ray !
    C'est beau l'évolution, non ?
    Allez, ne le prends pas trop mal, bonne journée et merci de ta réaction,
    Jean

Maybe you are looking for