FXO traffic is going over Wan link after enabling QoS

Hi,
We have CCM 5.0,2811 voice gateway,1 4FXO and 1 g.shdsl card on it. 4 Telco lines are on 4FXO card.CCM is at the other side of g.shdsl line.Topology like that,
2811 ---------------- CCM
4fxo g.shdsl
When a call receives from FXO port, system is working normally without QoS. When we enable QoS traffic,traffic is going over wan link then return again.Because of that,delays and timeouts occuring.Router's config is at the attachment. Please Help!
Thank you

Check your H323 gateway config in CCM to be sure the Media Termination Point Required box is unchecked. Using MTP forces the call to terminate on the closest MTP resource which is likely at your CCM site.
Please rate helpful posts.
Dave

Similar Messages

I want to know how to get the web addresses to go away that appear in the bottom left corner of the browser every time my mouse goes over a link

Any time that my mouse goes over a link on a web page a little box in the bottom left corner of the browser pops up showing the web address for that link and it is really annoying, especially when i am on facebook because there are so many links on the home page i cant move my mouse anywhere without that box popping up and blocking part of my conversations. I was wondering if there was any way to turn this off. I've checked through the options and to my knowledge there is no way to turn it off. Just wondered if anyone else has had this problem or knew if there was a way to get that box to go away.

Another option would be to use the following extension to push those messages into the status bar. It could be a convenient way to have your messages visible when you want them, but with less distraction.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/status-4-evar/
If you try it, let us know what you think.

Transport dot1q vlan tagging over wan link

Hi,
I would like to transport 802.1Q vlan tagging over a wan link, is it possible ?
I heard about l2tp V3...
Best regards

Hi,
You would have to use a technology such as Ethernet over MPLS (EoMPLS) or VPLS. This technology is referred to as Layer 2 VPNs. You can get more info on this at the following locations:
EoMPLS (part of the Cisco Any Transport over ATM suite):
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6646/products_ios_protocol_option_home.html
VPLS:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6648/products_ios_protocol_option_home.html
Hope that helps - pls rate the post if it does.
Regards,
Paresh

User home directory on server over WAN link

Hello all,
I have a performance question about home directories. The situation is:
- 3 locations, 3 servers (OS X server 10.4.7 (Xserves))
- WAN connections are 1 Mbit/s
- All clients running 10.4.7 (imac G5 1.6/1.8 GHz.)
- User home folders are all located on one of the three servers
Two locations are OD replicas from the first location.
User home folders are located on the server at the location where they work most.
Some users work 4 days at location A, and 1 day at location B or C.
For simplicity let's say I have a user called A, with home directory located on server at location A.
User A is now working one day at location B. User logs in successfully, but everything is very slow (1 Mbit WAN link).
I really like the flexibility of server based home folders. Also the fact that there is no data on the local machines is very much appreciated (physical security, backup etc.). I was thinking about portable home directories, but that won't solve my problem, given the fact that all data needs to be copied once from location A to B (especially when users use different machines on the other location). Data will be stored on the local machines as well in that situation (but can be synchronized).
It is of course possible to synchronize data from server A to B and C when a user logs off (rsync). Is there any way to tell OD that it should pick a user home directory based on the location where that specific user logs in? Disk space isn't really an issue.
The performance is really awful using a 1 Mbit connection and upgrading the connections is not really an option (well maybe I could get it to 2 Mbit, but that won't solve this problem).
Thanks for any advice.
Jordi
Powerbook G4 Mac OS X (10.4.7)

How about firewire harddrive or ipod-based home directories which the users could take to different offices with them?
If not... I really think that your best option is to work to get Portable Home Directories working. Remember it is only the data that has been changed that is synced each time. You mention you are concerned about backup, but this will be done from the server after user data is sync'd there. The physical security worries can be taken take of by using open firmware passwords.
Is there any way to tell OD that it should pick a user home directory based
on the location where that specific user logs in?
By using DHCP at each site to bind the clients you can force them to use the Home Diretory you specifiy at each site. But this sounds like a sync & backup nightmare to me and don't forget rsync will mangle your acl's and other meta data.
hth,
b.

SQL Server Connection over WAN Link

I am planning
to setup a BlackBerry server and connect to a remote SQL Server over a
WAN link with 150+ms ping time. Is there a known tolerance for
SQL server connection latency? For example, I have been told by
RIM that ping time for Exchange should be around 35ms so if it is
higher, a BES should be placed next to the Exchange server. Any reply would be greatly appreciated.

There is no problem with slow connection :-)
You might get lots of waits in the SQL side (most likly there will be lots of
ASYNC_NETWORK_IO) which you can monitor using sys.dm_os_waiting_tasks and sys.dm_exec_requests. But if there is no disconnections then most small application will work OK
[Personal Site] [Blog] [Facebook]

ZCC remote contol terribly slow over WAN links compared to RC via ZDM 7 or RDC

I think the subject tells all. The connection is via a direct VPN
connection of the remote controlling PC to the LAN of the controlled PC
- so there is no proxy inbetween.
I disabled encryption but that did not help much.
Part of the problem seems to be, that Windows RDC and ZDM 7 remote
control are able to saturate the WAN link during a page refresh,
whereas the ZCC remote viewer only uses 1/4 to 1/2 of the link
bandwidth at most.
W. Prindl

Correct.
If you enable "Password Based" remote control in the RC policy, you can
use that password to remote control the PC from virtually any VNC Client.
Clearly this gets around some of the security features provided with ZCM
Security, but allows for interoperation with other VNC Clients if you
wanted to use them for some reason.
On 5/14/2010 6:06 PM, kjhurni wrote:
>
> craig_wilson;1974693 Wrote:
>> Password vs Rights based Security.
>>
>> Rights Based Security is what Novell provides on top of VNC for added
>> security.
>>
>> Password Based Remote Control is VNC security, but Novell allows for
>> central control of the password as well.
>>
>> Password Based Remote Control can be enabled or disabled via your
>> Remote
>> Control policy.
>>
>>
>> On 5/13/2010 2:22 PM, W_ Prindl wrote:
>>> Same question as you ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
>> Novell Knowledge Partner
>>
>> Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
>>
>> Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
>> These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational
>> human.
>
> So with password-based security you can you "any" VNC viewer, provided
> you enter the correct userid/password to gain access?
>
> With rights-based you have to use the one from ZCM?
>
> (Just checking to make sure I'm understanding correctly)
>
>
Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
Novell Knowledge Partner
Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.

Clips goes over red color after importing movies clips

Clips goes overdosed by red color after importing movies clips

I guess it doesn't look like that in the QuickTime player. 640x480? That's a computer form of NTSC yet you're using a PAL frame rate. That's very weird. What's the codec?
You might also check the color space your display is set to, though the clip below it in the browser doesn't show the problem.

Force Routing Over second link?

We have a MPLS WAN connecting our offices from our Service Provider. Our Head Office has a larger 50Mbps pipe and a remote office has 2 separate 2Mbps links (lets call them link1 and link2). Right now all traffic only goes over Link1 at the remote office as per all the BGP routing. I can make a static route at the remote office for specific traffic to go over link2 and it will successfully send over that link. My question is, is there a way to get traffic from Head Office to go to Link2 instead of Link1?

It primary depends on BGP routing. You can try to change the way ISP send traffic to you branch using different BGP path attribute in advertisement on the two links but you have to negotiated with ISP because they can also "force" their netwrok to use on path instead of the other for example using BGP local preference. I suggest you to read here to understand BGP algorithm:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13753-25.html
Bye,
enrico

Can I Change How The Pointer Appears Over A Link?

Is there a way to change my pointer so that it doesn't change to the little pointer finger when it goes over a link? I have a larger pointer and it shrinks back down to the teeny hand when I'm on the web. It drives me nuts.
Also, I'm still using 10.3.9, but I was hoping there was some way for me to change it. Is there a preference pain or something?
Thanks!

In Tiger, the Universal preference panel>Mouse - at the bottom - "difficulty in seeing a mouse" gives the option of making the pointer larger. When I tried it, i.e. move the slider to the right, the pointer did not reduce in size when I moved over a link in Safari. Not sure if the same feature is offered in Panther.
Hope this helps.

Synching/Caching Critical Patches across WAN links

It is my understanding that all Microsoft Critical Patches will automatically cache(download), create themselves as bundles and become part of the content-repo which will automatically sync between all primary servers. If I have the check box for caching to the Satellites, they will also automatically cache to the satellites.
Does this happen immediately upon download/caching of the critical patch? Does this mean that if I have 150 remote sites connected over WAN links, my corporate site will be flooding my WAN links with these updates all AT THE SAME TIME? I have both a 10.2 and a 10.3beta testing - I can at least control in 10.3 that it will only happen at night and only take so much of the remote sites' bandwidth, but that still doesn't help out my corporate site's bandwidth if it's trying to send out to 150 remote sites. Any thoughts, suggestions, workarounds or clarification?
Is there any way to know when/what time a patch actually downloaded/cached to the Primary Servers content-repo OR to the Satellite content-repo?

The "Cache automatically to satellites" specifies what to cache, whereas the replication interval (Under Server Hierarchy->Configure Satellite Server) specifies when. So the sequence would be:
1. Keep the "Cache automatically to satellites" checked.
2. Set the replication inteval for the satellites (ZCC->Configuration->Server Hierarchy->Configure Satellite Server) to something very high (say, 999 days). This will prevent satellites from replicating content by themselves
3. Go ahead and set up a scheduler task to run zac wake-cdp at the required time.
Others,
Any other suggestions?

Notebook 8470p cpu temp goes over 75 C support center claimes its normal

cpu goes over 75 C after local support replaced fan ,m/b ,cpu they claim its normal i dont buy that answer since they dont know how to deal with this issue they try to sell me stories how can i ascalate this issue to recieve good service and have the laptop fixed once and for all warranty will expire within 6 months need to solve issue soon

HI @alfredf .
Welcome to the HP forum!
To get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums since the Elitebook 8470p is a commercial product. You can do this at:
Commercial/Notebook - HP ProBook, EliteBook, Compaq, Slate/Tablet PC, Armada, LTE
The support page for your product may be helpful in the meantime: HP EliteBook 8470p Notebook PC.
I hope this helps!
Sparkles1
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom right to say “Thanks” for helping!

Muliticast Traffic Over ATM Link

Hi,
I have a ATM link (45Mb/s) between 2 location . In one of my locations I multicast 4 diffrent Video traffic. But my 4 multicast traffic is going to the source router by 1 Fastethernet port and after that it's going to destionation over the ATM link. now I have a issue on destionation . I need to seperate 4 multicast traffic on the destionation router . it has to be 1 on of my multicast traffic going through VLAN 123 and other 3 multicast traffics going through VLAN 200.
now all of the multicast traffic is going trough vlan 123.
any body can help me on this issue?
thanks
Mike

Hey Stephan,
The 'vpc bind-vrf' command allocates a special internal VLAN for routing traffic over the vPC peer-link to ensure L3 connections on the vPC peer or orphan ports successfully receive multicast traffic on N5k/N6k platforms. This workaround is not needed on the N7K because that platform implements the vPC loop prevention rule differently in hardware.
In short, 'vpc bind-vrf' is not required on N7K.
-Andy

Reroute some vrf traffic between 2 sites over redundant link

hey guys,
We have a single client (in vrf) with 2 sites in different states and running over our mpls core.. Our primary link in our core is experiencing degredation of service and want to route this client over our redundant link while keeping all other clients going over our primary link - is this possible?
The client in question has its own vrf (L3VPN) at both sites and is running over mpls between both sites. We want to re-route this particular client to take our backup path, while keeping everyone else between both sites going over the primary. We are not using TE, instead LDP to build MPLS.
I don't believe this is possible to only re-route one client, however I thought I would ask the question.
We cannot failover to secondary link for everyone between both sites because the link doesn't have the capacity.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Using MPLS TE would certainly be an option. You would need to setup an MPLS TE LSP over the backup. You would also need to configure a separate lookback interface on each PE and use this loopback interface address as the next hop for the specific VRF
ip vrf X
bgp next-hop loopback 999
ip route 255.255.255.255 Tu1
This way you would make sure that only the traffic for this specific VRF would travel over the TE tunnel.
Regards

EEM -automatic shut down or switch over of WAN link in OSPF when packet drop increase

Hi,
Need help..
can any one help me how can EEM help for automatic shut down or switch over of WAN link in OSPF when packet drop increase a predefined level.
I have a set up different branches connected together...OSPF is the routing protocol and need to communicate with two branches via hub locations.
need to shut or switch some percent of traffic from primary to back up when packet drop in the link.

I am not sure EEM can do what you want.
Another option could be to use SLA tacking/monitoring. But you will fall back to the new route when you lose some percentage of pings, you can't switch only part of the traffic.
I hope it helps.
PK

Eigrp - How to modify Admin distance for redistributing connected links and over WAN

We have a single EIGRP domain 101 across 2 locations (A and B) separated by a WAN link. Each location has a number of L3 switches at the IDF behind the router which has the L3 vlans VL1, VL2 etc. We run eigrp 101 across all the switches and on the routers but we dont advertise any of the L3 vlans on them and we do redistribute static and connected for the static and the vlans to be distributed on eigrp.
Qn
1. How do i reduce the admin distance of the directly connected vlan on IDF on our core switch. ie. Vl1 and Vl2 that are distributed via connected has a admin distance of 170 locally as the other switches sees that as External without having to advertise the networks individually on each switch.
2. Is that possible to increase the admin distance over the WAN link without having to create a 2nd eigrp domain. ie.. Add a admin distance of say 50 over the WAN link and that way devices on both sides do see that there is a 130 distance for the remote side and 90 for local for admin distance.
Why?
I am trying to separate two locations and i don't think we will be able to create an additional domain and i am trying to see alternate methods of achieving this.
Additional info-
The design i mentioned has 2 locations with a WAN connection and i have mixed (90/170) distance based on where the routes are coming(eigrp/connected/static) from eventhough everything is within the same network. We only have 1 Eigrp network 101 and was looking to alter the AD for just connected if at all possible.
Assuming i put in all the routes into the network how can i make site 2 see the site 1 network with a larger admin distance and 1 to 2 with a larger admin distance while not altering the admin distance within the local site.
Underlying reason: We are getting a MPLS link(lower bandwidth) connecting to site 3,4 and 5 at both sites and wanted to clear the internal routing first before i can add them or redistribute them into bgp.

If these two sites are connected via a P2P link and you are exchanging EIGRP routes across it then you need to be aware of what you redistribute into BGP because each site will know about it's own subnets but also the other sites subnets.
If you just redistribute all EIGRP at both sites then it's a lottery as to which MPLS connection the non EIGRP sites use.
So you either need to -
1) when you redistribute EIGRP at each site into BGP use a route map and only allow the local networks for that site
or
2) if you want each of the EIGRP sites to back each other's MPLS connection up you could have them both advertise out all networks ie. their own and the other EIGRP site's networks but modify the BGP attributes of the non local networks so they are least preferred.
You still want to use a route map to ensure only the local and other EIGRP sites network are redistributed because remember you are also receiving BGP routes from the non EIGRP sites and redistributing these into EIGRP at each site and these are exchanged via the P2P link as well.
It realty depends on what you are trying to do.
The actual basic redistribution is very straightforward, see this link -
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/113506-failover-eigrp-bgp-00.html
but you need to decide what you are going to do in terms of EIGRP to BGP advertisements as covered above.
I'm not trying to make things complicated for you but because you have a P2P link connecting these sites and you are running EIGRP over it then any routes received via BGP will be redistributed into EIGRP and you need to make sure they are then not redistributed back into BGP on the other site router.
Jon

FXO traffic is going over Wan link after enabling QoS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for