FYI:142840-03  WITHDRAWN PATCH Logical Domains (LDoms) Manager 1.2 ldmd

If you're in a patching mood this time of the year it's worth noting that the ldmd patch has been withdrawn:
[142840-03|http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-142840-03-1] WITHDRAWN PATCH Logical Domains (LDoms) Manager 1.2 ldmd patch
Glen

Only now i noticed, that i created this topic in wrong category. Sorry about that. :/

Similar Messages

  • Logical Domains (LDoms)

    Using Logical Domains and CoolThreads Technology: Improving Scalability and System Utilization
    This blueprint describes a Sun project that explored the use of Sun's CMT platform and the Logical Domains (LDoms) virtualization technology as a means to increase application software scalability and improve system utilization. Using LDoms software, multiple logical systems � each with its own operating system and each running an independent instance of the application software � are created on a single server.
    http://wikis.sun.com/display/BluePrints/Using+Logical+Domains+and+CoolThreads+Technology

    CWKS2CMDB is a project designed to provide uni-directional integration between CiscoWorks� Resource Manager Essentials (RME), a network management solution for Cisco switches, access servers, and routers, and BMC� Atrium� CMDB (Atrium CMDB) version 2.x. Atrium CMDB provides all the necessary features to implement the configuration management database in a user's environment. CWKS2CMDB can exchange data between RME and the BMC� Remedy� Action Request System� (AR System) forms or Atrium CMDB classes.

  • Solaris 8, 9, and 10 zones in logical domains

    We are planning to migrate our current environment to T5-2.
    Current application environment is running with Solaris 8, 9 and 10 OS versions in V8* series and M5000.
    Our plan is to install multiple logical domains in T5-2 with Solaris 10 or 11 and migrate the current running Solaris 8, 9 and 10 servers as zones. Plan is to create the flash using flar and restore in the target T5-2.
    Will there be any issue with the said OS versions on migration?
    Please suggest.

    Lars,
    Use ldmp2v to convert existing physical server to VM  and
    Convert Solaris 8 and 9 physical servers to container in Solaris 10 VM?
    Is that what you are saying?
    Major constraint I have is, applications running in the current physical servers have no vendor support, vendor doesn't exist any more. Application has been locked to run only on the same OS version. What I am worried is, while running ldmp2v should not prevent the application coming up in the new virtualized environment. Keeping that in mind, I gave a thought like
    1. Install and configure the CDOM (control domain)
    2. configure and Install LDOMs with Solaris 10 OS
    3. Run flar on the existing Solaris 10 physical server
    4. Transfer the flar created to Solaris 10 LDOM and configure it as a zone
    5. For Solaris 8 and 9, create LDOMs with Solaris 10 OS
    6. Install additional patches and packages needed for supporting Solaris 8 and 9 zones
    6. create flar images on the existing Solaris 8 and 9 physical servers
    7. transfer the images to newly created LDOM and configure the zone.
    8. Current servers sun4u which has to be converted to sun4v.

  • Convert Solaris 10 zones to Logical Domain

    I am in the process of building a Solaris 10 server on a T3-2 server. I am installing the 8/11 update of Solaris 10 and will be installing OVM for SPARC v2.2 on the server. Currently we are running a number of Solaris Zones on Solaris 10 servers. Instead of creating a Logical Domain for each of the physical servers with zones on them, I want to convert each of the zones in a logical domain. The zones are running on SunFire V890s and SunFire V440 servers. They are running the 10/09 update of Solaris 10 that has been patched to the latest kernel level, 147440-15. Can anyone guide me in an appropriate procedure to build the logical domains? Thanks.

    may be better to move zone into s10 zone inside s11 ldom

  • How to create Logical domain in Sun Fire T2000 server

    Hi,
    I am new to this Logical domain, Can some one provide me doc to install a guest OS in logical domain.I have sun T 2000 server with solaris 10 OS
    Regards
    Alex

    Hi Alex,
    this is a good place to start reading (even though it refers to LDOMs 1.0):
    http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0207/820-0832.pdf
    followed by here for the docs set for whichever version you're using - have fun!
    http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/prod/ldoms

  • Convert Solaris 10 Zones into a Logical Domain

    I am in the process of building a Solaris 10 server on a T3-2 server. I am installing the 8/11 update of Solaris 10 and will be installing OVM for SPARC v2.2 on the server to migrate our older physical servers to Logical Domains. Currently we are running a number of Solaris Zones on Solaris 10 servers. Instead of creating a Logical Domain for each of the physical servers with zones on them, I want to convert each of the zones into a logical domain. The zones are running on SunFire V890s and SunFire V440 servers. They are running the 10/09 update of Solaris 10 that has been patched to the latest kernel level, 147440-15. Can anyone guide me in an appropriate procedure to build the logical domains? Thanks.

    may be better to move zone into s10 zone inside s11 ldom

  • Zones or Logical Domains

    Hello,
    If I have an Enterprise T5120 server, would I be better off employing solaris zones or logical domains? I took a long break from this area of expertise and find myself in the wonderful world of virtualization!
    Also, if you have any recommendations on books, whitepapers, other documentation, etc., that I can read on both subjects, I would be very appreciative.
    Thank you for you assistance.

    Well, you could use both :)
    did you see this article? I find it rather good:
    http://blogs.oracle.com/bobn/entry/zones_vs_ldoms
    .7/M.

  • T2000, Logical domains & Clustering

    Hi,
    I am looking after the possibility to partition a T2000 in three logical domains. I would like on of these only to be clustered, while having the two others active-active. So that in case on T2000 fails, one LD failover transparently for the rest of the world, while the remaining active non clustered LD keeps working with its current work.
    Is it possible ?

    CWKS2CMDB is a project designed to provide uni-directional integration between CiscoWorks� Resource Manager Essentials (RME), a network management solution for Cisco switches, access servers, and routers, and BMC� Atrium� CMDB (Atrium CMDB) version 2.x. Atrium CMDB provides all the necessary features to implement the configuration management database in a user's environment. CWKS2CMDB can exchange data between RME and the BMC� Remedy� Action Request System� (AR System) forms or Atrium CMDB classes.

  • Sun Logical Domains

    Hi,
    Logical Domains from Sun does not seem to be a "Hard partitioning". Is there any plan to make it a hard partitioning ?
    Marian

    Best to check via your Oracle Sales contact.

  • LDOM Issue on T2000   ldmd cannot communicate with the hypervisor as the re

    Hi,
    There were some issues with old primary LDOM at T2000 so I installed
    new o/s 64 bit on SUN SPARC T2000 and reset SC on factor-default and
    also installed LDOM 1.2 version. Seems like old hypervisor is not
    deleted.
    Now I am getting error.
    #ldm list
    Failed to connect to logical domain manager: Connection refused
    So far I have trying the following steps. but still no luck
    I installed version 1.2 LDOM. and also I updated SC. Plus I installed
    below patches:
    •118833-36, Kernel update patch
    •124921-02, which contains updates to the Logical Domains 1.0 drivers
    and utilities
    •125043-01, which contains updates to the qcn (console) drivers.
    SC> bootmode config="factory-default"
    SC> poweroff
    SC> resetsc -y
    SC> poweron
    Now I tried everything but still no luck
    Here are some errot which I am getting
    #Svcs -xv
    [ Oct  5 00:07:14 Method "start" exited with status 96 ]
    [ Oct  5 00:32:11 Leaving maintenance because disable requested. ]
    [ Oct  5 00:32:11 Disabled. ]
    [ Oct  5 00:32:21 Enabled. ]
    [ Oct  5 00:32:21 Executing start method ("/opt/SUNWldm/bin/ldmd_start") ]
    Service LOG file Info:
    ldmd cannot communicate with the hypervisor as the required device
    does not exist:
    /devices/virtual-devices@100/channel-devices@200/virtual-channel@0:hvctl
    Either this is not the control domain or the firmware does not support LDoms
    [ Oct  5 00:32:21 Method "start" exited with status 96 ]
    [ Oct  5 00:43:54 Leaving maintenance because disable requested. ]
    [ Oct  5 00:43:54 Disabled. ]
    [ Oct  5 00:45:19 Enabled. ]
    [ Oct  5 00:45:19 Executing start method ("/opt/SUNWldm/bin/ldmd_start") ]
    ldmd cannot communicate with the hypervisor as the required device
    does not exist:
    /devices/virtual-devices@100/channel-devices@200/virtual-channel@0:hvctl
    Either this is not the control domain or the firmware does not support LDoms
    [ Oct  5 00:45:19 Method "start" exited with status 96 ]
    [ Oct  5 00:45:19 Rereading configuration. ]
    bash-3.00# cd /opt/SUNWldm/bin/
    bash-3.00# ls
    ldm ldmconfig ldmd ldmd_start schemas
    bash-3.00# ./ldmd_start
    ldmd cannot communicate with the hypervisor as the required device
    does not exist:
    /devices/virtual-devices@100/channel-devices@200/virtual-channel@0:hvctl
    Either this is not the control domain or the firmware does not support LDoms
    bash-3.00# ldm
    Failed to connect to logical domain manager: Connection refused
    bash-3.00# sc>
    sc> showhost
    Sun-Fire-T2000 System Firmware 6.7.12 2011/07/06 20:03
    Host flash versions:
    OBP 4.30.4.d 2011/07/06 14:29
    Hypervisor 1.7.3.c 2010/07/09 15:14
    POST 4.30.4.b 2010/07/09 14:24
    bash-3.00#
    bash-3.00# uname -a
    SunOS ldom-srv 5.10 Generic_118833-36 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    There were some issues with old primary LDOM at T2000 so I installed
    new o/s 64 bit on SUN SPARC T2000 and reset SC on factor-default and
    also installed LDOM 1.2 version. Seems like old hypervisor is not
    deleted.
    Now I am getting error.
    #ldm list
    Failed to connect to logical domain manager: Connection refused
    So far I have trying the following steps. but still no luck
    I installed version 1.2 LDOM. and also I updated SC. Plus I installed
    below patches:
    •118833-36, Kernel update patch
    •124921-02, which contains updates to the Logical Domains 1.0 drivers
    and utilities
    •125043-01, which contains updates to the qcn (console) drivers.
    SC> bootmode config="factory-default"
    SC> poweroff
    SC> resetsc -y
    SC> poweron
    Now I tried everything but still no luck
    Here are some errot which I am getting
    #Svcs -xv
    [ Oct  5 00:07:14 Method "start" exited with status 96 ]
    [ Oct  5 00:32:11 Leaving maintenance because disable requested. ]
    [ Oct  5 00:32:11 Disabled. ]
    [ Oct  5 00:32:21 Enabled. ]
    [ Oct  5 00:32:21 Executing start method ("/opt/SUNWldm/bin/ldmd_start") ]
    Service LOG file Info:
    ldmd cannot communicate with the hypervisor as the required device
    does not exist:
    /devices/virtual-devices@100/channel-devices@200/virtual-channel@0:hvctl
    Either this is not the control domain or the firmware does not support LDoms
    [ Oct  5 00:32:21 Method "start" exited with status 96 ]
    [ Oct  5 00:43:54 Leaving maintenance because disable requested. ]
    [ Oct  5 00:43:54 Disabled. ]
    [ Oct  5 00:45:19 Enabled. ]
    [ Oct  5 00:45:19 Executing start method ("/opt/SUNWldm/bin/ldmd_start") ]
    ldmd cannot communicate with the hypervisor as the required device
    does not exist:
    /devices/virtual-devices@100/channel-devices@200/virtual-channel@0:hvctl
    Either this is not the control domain or the firmware does not support LDoms
    [ Oct  5 00:45:19 Method "start" exited with status 96 ]
    [ Oct  5 00:45:19 Rereading configuration. ]
    bash-3.00# cd /opt/SUNWldm/bin/
    bash-3.00# ls
    ldm ldmconfig ldmd ldmd_start schemas
    bash-3.00# ./ldmd_start
    ldmd cannot communicate with the hypervisor as the required device
    does not exist:
    /devices/virtual-devices@100/channel-devices@200/virtual-channel@0:hvctl
    Either this is not the control domain or the firmware does not support LDoms
    bash-3.00# ldm
    Failed to connect to logical domain manager: Connection refused
    bash-3.00# sc>
    sc> showhost
    Sun-Fire-T2000 System Firmware 6.7.12 2011/07/06 20:03
    Host flash versions:
    OBP 4.30.4.d 2011/07/06 14:29
    Hypervisor 1.7.3.c 2010/07/09 15:14
    POST 4.30.4.b 2010/07/09 14:24
    bash-3.00#
    bash-3.00# uname -a
    SunOS ldom-srv 5.10 Generic_118833-36 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200
    Thanks in advance

  • LDOMs Manager v3.1: vnet performance gain

    Hi all,
    From this blog:  https://blogs.oracle.com/raghuram/entry/ldoms_virtual_network_performance_greatly1 I can see that there are certain prerequisites to be met before I can get the vnet performance gain using LDOMs Manager v3.1. I cannot find anything anywhere about the patches mentioned for Solaris 10 except a patch for the control domain. Are the driver changes incorporated in a S10 kernel patch or is it sufficient to set extended-mapin-space=on in guest domains to get the advertised performance gain ?

    Hi, DGC,
    You'll need the setting and the kernel patch, because the patch replaces network drivers with the faster ones.
    regards, Jeff

  • Workgroup Computer name will showed as "#Error" - Logical Disk Extension Management Pack By David Allen

    Anyone is applying the Logical Disk Extension Management Pack By David Allen?
    I have the issue whereby the Computer name will showed as "#Error" on the managed computer which is in
    Workgroup environment.
    Refer to this screenshot --> https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=75e44d0edffe5025#cid=75E44D0EDFFE5025&id=75E44D0EDFFE5025%21942.
    Is anyone know the way to fix this?
    Thanks!
    regards, Han Seen.

    The solution I used is to edit the management pack: the report displays the computer name only for computers that contains suffix in its name. if in SCOM the computer name is hostname.domain.net, only hostname will be shown as computer name.
    you can change it by editing the management pack:
    replace line number 2230 instead of
    <Value>=Left(Fields!Computer.Value,(instr(Fields!Computer.Value,".")-1))</Value>
    replace it with
    <Value>=Fields!Computer.Value</Value>
    now it will show you the full computer name under computer name area, and workgroup computer will be shown as well.

  • SMC not getting suggested patch info from Update Manager in Solaris 10

    Hi All,
    why SMC not getting suggested patch info from Update Manager in Solaris 10??
    Thank you in advance.

    Hi All,
    why SMC not getting suggested patch info from Update Manager in Solaris 10??
    Thank you in advance.

  • Is it possible to use logic rules to manage email submission receipts?

    Is it possible to use logic rules to manage email submission receipts?
    I have one form and based on the user's selection I want to manage which email submission receipt gets sent to that specific user.
    Is this at all possible?
    Please ask for clarification if I am not making sense.

    It should be no problem since the Audio Kontrol 1 is Core Audio compatible. This has nothing to do with VST's.
    In doubt contact Native Instruments support.
    Fox

  • Could you explain the work flow logic in dispute management

    Hello,
    Could any one explain the the work flow logic in dispute management .
    When will the first work flow initiate and who will recive the first notification and what are the action he/she usually perform. How it trigger to next level and what is the events consider for the next work flow trigger.
    If some one could share a real work flow example in line with Dispute management will be great...
    regards
    Sibichan

    Dispute management workflow will help to automate business process.
    When some action or information is expected form individual or department then
    Workflow can be triggered on editing some field in dispute case and workitem is send
    to individual or group, So that they can respond to it.
    We can use function email notifications to speed up the process.
    Based on organizational needs triggering events can vary.
    Regards,
    Raju

Maybe you are looking for