G/L account does not exist but cannot create G/L account.

Hi Guys
i got this error which says G/L account NO. 121000 does not exist in the chart of accounts INT, but when i tried to create the G/L account in FS00, the system says ths G/L account exists in company code PS01.this company code PS01 has the chart of accounts INT. suggestions are welcome.
Thanks and Regards
Vignesh

Hi,
interesting... the message means GL account is not created in chart of accounts INT (FSP0) but if its availabe in another comp. code with the same chart of accouns it MUST be created in INT. Try to create it for your particular company code (FSS0).
T-Code FS00 covers both views.
Best regards, Christian

Similar Messages

  • The e-mail account does not exist at the organization

    Hi, I have a user account that people receive the following message from:
    The e-mail account does not exist at the organization this message was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or contact the recipient directly to find out the correct address.
    <mailserverishere #5.1.1>"
    I'ved looked and this particular case could be a quirky one.
    The details are:
    User account A is the account that Exchange thinks doesn't exist.
    User account B is her boss.
    A copy of user B's email is sent to A. (done through Delivery Options)
    Senders sometime receive an email back saying user A's address doesn't exist.
    (which really confuses them because they sent the email to B)
    This is the only time the bounce message appears.
    I've removed the forward and added it again. Still the problem.
    Any clues?

    You need to verify old delegates in UserB's mailbox by going to Tools -> Options -> Delegates. Remove old UserA and re-add it.
    This is because of option “Delegates receives copy of meeting-related mails sent to me” is ticked with old UserA id in Delegates.
    If you can't see any delegates then you have another option to delete delegates rule with MFCMapi.
    - Open UserB's Mailbox with MFCMapi where UserB's outlook profile configured in online mode (not Cache mode)
    - Double click the Mailbox of userB to open.
    - Expand Root Container -> Top of the information store -> Inbox folder
    - Right-click the "Inbox" folder, and then click "Display Rules Table".
    - You can see all rules configured in mailbox. 
    - Delete the Delegate Rule with "PR_RULE_PROVIDER" column property shows "Schedule+EMS Interface". (this is the same option which you can set with GUI Delegation "Delegates receives copy of meeting-related mails sent to me" but stale copy is still in mailbox.)
    THANK YOU! Amit Tank

  • Run As Account does not exist on the target system or does not have enough permissions

    We are getting below alerts,
    Run As Account does not exist on the target system or does not have enough permissions.
    I know we can create a Run As account with low Privilege can fix this issue ,
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinholman/archive/2010/09/08/configuring-run-as-accounts-and-profiles-in-r2-a-sql-management-pack-example.aspx
    My question here is there is any other way to fix it. I tried giving below permission for scom_act account (we used for agent installation and has local admin rights) but still same issue and
    also i tried with sysadmin access for scom_act as well but no luck still having same issue , any solution would be welcome
    The min. Privilege for monitor SQL server
    DB Server Level
    a.  VIEW ANY DEFINITION
    b. VIEW SERVER STATE
    c.     VIEW ANY DATABASE
    Each DB
    a.  SQLAgentReaderRole database role.
    b.  PolicyAdministratorRole database role

    Check below link
    http://blog.coretech.dk/msk/run-as-account-does-not-exist-on-the-target-system-or-does-not-have-enough-permissions/
    Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"
    Mai Ali | My blog: Technical | Twitter:
    Mai Ali

  • Messaging Server 4.1: Received mail is not returned to the sender if the receiving local account does not exist.

    I have found that received mail is not returned to the sender if the receiving
    local account does not exist. This problem occurs even if I use Console to
    enable the Return message to sender option under the error handling methods.
    In addition, I have used the configutil
    to confirm that I have set the value
    for Unknown account action to "13," which corresponds to the settings "Return
    message to sender," "Notify the postmaster via email," and "Log the error in
    the log file." Yet, in this situation, an error message is being sent to
    postmaster, but not to the sender, and the error is not being recorded in the
    log file.
    <P>
    Do the following steps:<BR>
    <P>
    <OL>
    <LI>From Console, open the appropriate Messaging Server.
    <LI>Click the Configuration tab.
    <LI>Open the Services folder.
    <LI>Select SMTP.
    <LI>Click the System tab.
    </OL>
    <P>
    Check the "Domain handled by this server exclusively" field to make sure that
    your mail domain is listed. If your mail domain is not listed, then Messaging
    Server will assume that there is another mail server that is handling the
    domain listed and will forward requests to this server.
    <P>
    For more information, please see the document <I>Messaging Server
    Administrator's Guide</I>, Chapter 3, Configuring SMTP Services at <BR>
    http://docs.iplanet.com/docs/manuals/messaging/nms41/ag/smtp.htm#1010371

    On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:16:02 +0000, lpphiggp wrote:
    > I'm seeing this XTCOM error occur all over our /var/log/messages for one
    > server, running SLES11sp2 / OES11/sp1;
    >
    > I don't really know what this is even for. We don't use NetStorage or
    > iPrint even, this server only does basic NCP file serving, DHCP, and
    > hosts a GroupWise PO.
    > Is this anything to be concerned about?
    If this:
    http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...entication-vs-
    edirectory-825043/
    is to be believed, it seems to indicate that your NAM configuration on
    this server is not valid. I'm not seeing this message here on the OES
    servers I looked at, and NAM is working correctly here.
    David Gersic dgersic_@_niu.edu
    Knowledge Partner http://forums.netiq.com
    Please post questions in the forums. No support provided via email.
    If you find this post helpful, please click on the star below.

  • MR11 received error FH004 "Account does not exist in chart of account"

    after apply supportpack upgrades from SAPKH46C08 to SAPKH46C53, MR11 list contain line items that were cleared before the upgrade.  I've also used FBL5N and status now says open.  When I try to clear GR/IR with MR11, it errors out with message FH 004 "Account does not exist in chart of account..."  I even tried to search OSS notes, none are found.  Anyone have a similar problem but fixed? if so, how was it fixed?  thank you.

    working with transaction MR11.  Problem came from OLD Open Items that were transferred from an old system (not SAP R/3).  It only applies to "Invoice Surplus".  The Old Open items were cleared before the 4.6C support pack upgrade from SAPKH46C08 to SAPKH46C53.  I am not sure (1) why these become "open" again  (2) why when using MR11, I received "Account does not exist in chart of accounts..." error message code: FH004. (3) this does not apply to newer open items.  Newer items posted fine without errors.  Any ideas?  thank you.

  • G/L Account does not exist Error 4113

    Hello Experts,
    I am trying to create a Request in FICA via FKKORD1 and I receive this error. I have done all the necessary configuration. Not sure which posting area these requests hit. I have configured accouts for Posting Areas 0050, 0070, 0060, 0061, 0040, S000, S001 and 1220. Please help as I can not move.

    Check this thread where the same topic has been discussed
    Invoicing Error >4113 - G/L account does not exist
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • G/L Account does not exist error while invoicing

    Hi ,
    I am trying to invoice an account. While invoicing it is throwing the following error message G/L Account does not exist.
    From where can I know which G/L account it is refering to? or which main/sub is not mainteined for this ADID.
    Thanks in advance
    Debashish

    Hi There
    Go to the sales document (order VA02) (Contract VA42).  Click on the relevant item and go to > Environment > Analysis > Account determination.  It shows 6 options, click on each one till you find the relevant account.  Do this for all items on the Sales/contract if necessary.
    This can be found in customizing under SPRO > Sales and Distrib > Basic Functions > Account assignment/costing > Revenue account determination, > Assign GL accounts.  Your SD consultant can help you.
    In VF02, release the billing doc and it will give you details as well.
    Hope this helps
    Kind regards
    Dawn

  • Iphone is dead, gone  to insurance co. for replacement. They say because "Find My iPhone" is still active, they can't replace or try to fix it. problem is can't log in to de-activate it, cos email account does not exist anymore. How can I de-activate it?

    iphone is dead, gone  to insurance co. for replacement. They say because "Find My iPhone" is still active, they can't replace or try to fix it. problem is can't log in to de-activate it, cos email account does not exist anymore. How can I de-activate it?

    You never used your iPhone?
    You never logged into iTunes?
    Your AppleID & Password for iCloud&  iPhone should be the same AppleID &Password you used to log in here and post a message.
    -> Find your Apple ID

  • Cluvfy returns Path "/tmp/" does not exist and cannot be created on nodes

    Hi,
    I'm installing Oracle RAC for SAP in AIX 5L.
    After run Pre-check for cluster services setup it returns the next message:
    Path "/tmp/" does not exist and cannot be created on nodes
    This meessage is happening after Checking node reachability and Checking user equivalence phases.
    This is my complete log:
    pr_bd01/oramedia/clusterware/Disk1/cluvfy/> ./runcluvfy.sh stage -pre crsinst -n pr_bd01,pr_bd02
    Performing pre-checks for cluster services setup
    Checking node reachability...
    Node reachability check passed from node "pr_bd01".
    Checking user equivalence...
    User equivalence check passed for user "oracle".
    ERROR:
    Path "/tmp/" does not exist and cannot be created on nodes:
    pr_bd01
    Verification will proceed with nodes:
    pr_bd02
    Pre-check for cluster services setup was unsuccessful on all the nodes.
    The /tmp is a shared filesystem and oracle user can write and read it
    Oracle user id is the same in both nodes
    Group dba id is the same in both nodes
    Group oinstall id is the same in both nodes
    The primary group for Oracle user is oinstall
    Where can my problem be ?
    Thank you
    Edited by: user8114467 on 27/02/2009 07:17 AM

    Hi,
    Even if this is not resolved from above stuff then do the following
    [oracle@node1] ssh node1 date
    [oracle@node2] ssh node2 date
    Note that it is doing the ssh to itself rather than the remaining node(s). Usually people do forget to do atleast once the ssh to itself.
    Talok Khatri

  • HT1688 why do i have to reauthorize a computer that was already authorized, the computer i purchased some songs on does not exist anymore, and the email for that account does not exist anymore.

    why do i have to reauthorize a computer that was already authorized, the computer i purchased some songs on does not exist anymore, and the email for that account does not exist anymore. i can reset password because i doent know what the old one was

    Hi lgmmo,
    I think your best best to get this resolved is to contact Adobe Customer Care. Here's the contact info: Contact Customer Care.
    A quick Chat session should get you fixed up.
    Please let us know if you have additional questions.
    Best,
    Sara

  • FP08M error: Key for G/L accounting does not exist

    Hi,
    I am receiving this error message 'Key for G/L accounting does not exist' when trying to reverse document using t-code FP08M. If you could help me understand the error message, and maybe a way of getting the document reversed I would really appreciate it.
    Thank you!

    Hi,
    Such GL issues arise due to incomplete entries in TFK033D table.

  • IW32 - Capacity category does not exist or cannot be selected

    We are getting the bellow error upon exiting IW32, could you please tell us how to resolve
    Capacity category does not exist or cannot be selected
    Message no. CY374

    Hello Ehsan,
    This message also appeared for the first time after we applied EHP5, a note has been released regarding  (Message CY374)see  SAP note 1547467 for resolution and implement note 1504266 .  
    regards
    Spencer

  • My Email Accounts Does Not Exist Anymore

    Hopefully there is some help. I have had a verizon email account for many years. I switched to email providers and I was having email forwarded. When I try to sign in to the verizon email at the verizon web page it now says that the account does not exist?
    Can anyone help? Thanks

    Hi MissingEmail,
    Just a friendly reminder, this is a forum where users help other users. It looks like your issue may require a Verizon representative to review your account details. Please visit our Support page for a variety of ways to contact Verizon, including “Ask Verizon,” our virtual chat agent, and customer support phone numbers.

  • Wrong error message no. F6556 - Fund Centre does not exist but it do exists

    Hello Gurus,
    I am trying to transfer an Old PO to Funds Centre by changing the delivery quantity in PO but the delivery date in the PO is of June 2014. I have defined the derivation strategy and system is deriving fund centre correctly but it says that Fund Centre does not exists on delivery date which is 30.06.2014. I have created fund centre from 01/01/1900 till 31/12/9999.
    I tried to use FMCN it also gives the error message saying that fund centre does not exist even on current date.
    For testing I posted some FI document to that fund centre and it posted.
    I am not sure why it is giving error only for PO (PO has a account assignment to project/WBS).
    Thanks in advance!
    Regards
    Rohit Goel

    Hello Eli,
    The problem was that WBS was using the wrong cost centre with two leading zeros (User created wrong cost centre in test system with 8 character which means 2 leading zeros as prefix) but as per the cost centre structure it should have only one leading zero and rest nine characters must be numeric. I have created a fund centre with one leading zero and that's why system was giving error when using derivation strategy as it is picking cost centre from WBS master data but fund centre was created with one leading zero hence the error was coming. when I was defualting the fund centre specifically for the WBS it was picking because I was giving the correct fund centre.
    You also recommended something about leading zeros but it was not fully applicable in our case as we have defined the derivation startegy of populating the cost centre in fund centre field and our cost centre is of 9 chararcter (in table it shows with a leading zero to make it full 10 character) but when it gets populated in fund centre field it gets populated with leading zero means it takes a leading zeros into consideration when it gets derived from cost centre. For example if my cost centre is '123456789' the fund centre gets populated as '0123456789'
    But I got the clue to my problem from your hint of leading zeros.
    Thanks Once again!
    Regards
    Rohit Goel

  • G/L account does not exist in company code

    Hi,
    When posting a GR (movement type 101) via MIGO one of my users ran into above error message:
    G/L account 300000 does not exist in company code PFNA.
    I first checked the material valuation and found out that it was incorrect.
    After the material valuation in the master data was adjusted, I executed MIGO again, but I still end up with the same error message: G/L account 300000 does not exist in company code PFNA.
    Tried to add a line to the PO, even created a new PO for the same material / plant: same result.
    Did the simulation in OMWB for material / plant combination:
    - old valuation class: 300000
    - new valuation class: 340000
    Also in OBYC same GL accounts are related to BSX. Another GL account 440000 can be found in WRX (but is of no impact here).
    So it seems like although material master was updated, still the old valuation class is getting called to determine the account.
    Anyone any ideas?
    Thanks in advance!
    Geert

    Hi Amol,
    Thanks again for your input!
    Meanwhile I have received the material via MB1A movement type 202 and put the PO item on Delivery Completed.
    This was really a system bug as I had another PO and material (100% same situation including error message) for which the MIGO worked after the valuation class got changed in the material master.
    Thanks a lot for your help!
    Regards,
    Geert

Maybe you are looking for