G/L Account for Extension Service PO Value In-Correct

I'm extending an existing PO with a new Service Material and when the changes arrived in R/3, the G/L Account for the new Service Material changes to another value?!!!
When I traced in R/3 CDPOS, there is an OBJECTCLAS EINKBELEG entry which changes the Field SAKTO (G/L Account) from the value I input from the SRM into another value. I cannot trace where this change document was issued from and how this was issued?
Any help?

Hi Tony.
I feel that you are in extended classic scenario.
For the "extended classic scenario" with services you must consider the following corrections in the R/3 system as of Release 40.
1) Three new function modules
2) Source code corrections in R/3 System
-> account assignment category in R/3 system can be changed for EBP
These information are from one SAP note.
Note 431954 - Extended classic scenario (services): Changes in R/3.
regards,nishant
please reward point if this helps

Similar Messages

Verizon is charging my account for a service that was not provided.

Verizon is charging my account for a service that was not provided.
I am a LONG term Verizon customer and no one is helping.....
I work in IT, with the Network and Mobility groups, so I know what I am talking about, network access, O/S, bandwidth, etc….
I changed to a droid Bionic, from my LG (broken).   I started experiencing issues with inability to connect to a solid 4G network. The phone was not updated to Ice Cream Sandwich O/S and tried repeatedly to get update, but no go. Verizon did swap out with another bionic, but still experienced issues with inability to consistently get network access. I work in a big city, no one else was having issues at my work.
Husband left for Europe due to a family emergency mid Sept.   FIL was in hospital. I work and there is a 7 hour time difference.   We both had SKYPE on our phones. At work, I tried to contact him, using SKYPE.   SKYPE would not connect, due to the phone issue connecting to the network.   I had to call husband directly (international calls) to get updates on the condition of my ill, 96 yo FIL.
1.   This was not an issue of an app that did not function and that Verizon does not support.   I did not have access to the network, thus could not use SKYPE to make calls. This was not a choice to call international.
Verizon admitted that it was a phone issue. Since I am a long term Verizon customer and have insurance on the phone, they tried to give me yet another Bionic 9that would not work). After much discussion, they sent me a RAZR that was on the updated O/S.
Up to the 29th of Sept, I was on the Bionic and could not access SKYPE. Once I transferred over, I could use SKYPE and was not forced by Verizon to make international calls due the lack of network service that I pay for EACH MONTH.
When I received my bill for Sept, there were hundreds of dollars of additional charges.
This was due to the international calling that I was forced to use to check on status of terminally ill 96 yo FIL.
This was due to the overage of minutes that I had and was never notified of by Verizon, due to the interational calls.
I have tried to deal with Verizon on eliminating the charges. This is after having to deal with the death and funeral arrangements, service, etc of FIL. Verizon claims that I made the calls, thus I must pay.   They admitted to it being a Verizon network issue when they traded for the Razr and updated O/S, but still want me to pay hundreds of dollars in extra fees that THEY CAUSED.

szilasi wrote:
Just as a FYI.. Husband was at the hospital, not at a PC. It would be so sanitary and easy if all was scheduled properly, but guess what? Usually when someone is ill enough and has been rushed to the hospital and extended stay, you do not only contact at 6 AM in the morning.   You check on statuses, talk to doctors, etc. during the day.
I thought you said YOUR phone was the one having the problem, not his. You could have Skyped/emailed from a computer TO his phone, but you chose to call instead.
Yes, you are correct, everyone does not always think clearly when in a stressful situation such as that. Does not mean someone else should pay for YOUR actions.
Another thing I notice about your prior post is you say "Verizon claims that I made the calls, thus I must pay." but you also claim to have made the calls yourself, so it isn't necessarily that Verizon "claims" you made the calls, you DID make the calls.
Finally, I have found myself in a similar situation in the past and most likely in the near future. I also didn't(and don't) expect Verizon to pay for my phone usage during those times.

Service Accounts for Browser Services and FD Launcher (Full-text Search)

I am setting up SQL Failover Clustering (Version: 2012SP1) on Windows 2012. There are 2 options to configure the service account for Browser Services and FD Launcher :
Option 1) Using separate domain accounts, as what I have done for DB Engine and SQL Agent.
Option 2) accept the default, which is local service for
browser, and virtual account for
FD Launcher. Per documentation URL: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143504.aspx
which is the recommended one? is it option 2?
There is security note on above URL as well, but does not clearly mention that option 1 is not recommended.
Security Note: Always run SQL Server services by using the lowest possible user rights. Use a
MSA or
virtual account when possible. When MSA and virtual accounts are not possible, use a specific low-privilege user account or domain account instead of a shared account for SQL Server services. Use separate accounts for different SQL Server services. Do not
grant additional permissions to the SQL Server service account or the service groups. Permissions will be granted through group membership or granted directly to a service SID, where a service SID is supported.

Hi Luo Donghua,
In SQL Server Brower, the default logon account is NT Authority\Local service and cannot be changed during SQL Server setup.SQL Server Browser is not a clustered resource and does
not support failover from one cluster node to the other. SQL Server Browser should be installed and
turned on for each node of the cluster. SQL Server Browser should be run in the security context of a low privileged user to minimize exposure to a malicious attack.
You can change the account after the setup has been completed; For more information, see:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh510203.aspx.
In SQL Server full text filter daemon launcher, on Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008, the FDHOST Launcher service account also defaults to LOCAL SERVICE. If you provide a domain account in which to run the FDHOST Launcher service, we highly recommend
that you use a low privilege account. On Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008R2 , we use Virtual Account or Managed Service account(MSA) in FD Launcher . We also need to note the account you used for
FD Launcher should be different from the account that you use for the SQL Server service. For more information, see:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc281953(v=sql.100).aspx
So I recommend you use the option 2 to configure the service account for Browser Services and FD Launcher.
Thanks,
Sofiya Li
Sofiya Li
TechNet Community Support

Application Tools for Extension Services

Application Tools for Extension Services consist of WebSphere� Studio-based tools that support the development of Web applications targeted for the Extension Services for WebSphere Everyplace (ESWE) platform. These tools are based on the existing WebSphere Studio J2EE development tools and they are part of an emerging suite of tools for the ESWE platform.
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/eswetools?open&ca=dgr-awjw03eswetools

Can we safely assume you work for IBM's marketing department? Or are you just a zealous fan boy?

Service Accounts for Reporting Service in SQL Server Failover Cluster setup

I am setting up 2 Report Services (SSRS) in SQL Failover Clustering (Version: 2012SP1) on Windows 2012, as part of scale out architecture.
There are 2 options to configure the service account for SSRS:
Option 1) Using domain accounts, as what I have done for DB Engine and SQL Agent.
Option 2) accept the default, which is virtual account for SSRS. Per documentation URL:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143504.aspx
which is the recommended one? is it option 2?
There is security note on above URL as well, but does not clearly mention that option 1 is not recommended.
Security Note: Always run SQL Server services by using the lowest possible user rights. Use a MSA or virtual account when possible. When MSA and virtual accounts are not possible, use a specific low-privilege user account or domain account instead
of a shared account for SQL Server services. Use separate accounts for different SQL Server services. Do not grant additional permissions to the SQL Server service account or the service groups. Permissions will be granted through group membership or granted
directly to a service SID, where a service SID is supported.
Thanks very much for your help!

Hi Luo Donghua,
In SQL Server Failover Cluster Instance, personally two options can run well. If you use the virtual account for SQL Server Reporting Service. Virtual accounts in Windows Server 2008 R2 and Windows 7 are managed local accounts that provide the features to
simplify service administration. The virtual account is auto-managed, and the virtual account can access the network in a domain environment.
Of cause, you can also use domain accounts in your clustering.
Just make sure your service account is set up here, or that it is using a proper built-in account.For more information, see:http://ermahblerg.com/2012/11/08/cluster-ssrs-in-2008/
Thanks,
Sofiya Li
Sofiya Li
TechNet Community Support

Default GL Account for Material/Service Product type

Is it possible to default a particular GL account for Product types Material/Service.
Thanks
Sanjeev

Hi ,
Can we assign a GL account for a product category without specifing any account assignment category.
That means i want to assign the same GL for all the Account assignment category.
please provide the answer.
Regards,
Kumar.

Rewards card account for FIOS service -can one check transactions and balance online?

The phone line to check the balance is on some really bad call centerish line- so are the customer service centres-virtually inaudible on a very noisy line. THey were not aware that the web page for rewards cards does not show anything beside an image of the card and as status, the fact that it was mailed out (6 months back!) . No balance, no transactions are visible online. Neither customer service nor the rewards helpline are any use. Please advise how to check the balance and transactions online.
Thanks
w.

Your issue has been escalated to a Verizon agent. Before the agent can begin assisting you, they will need to collect further information from you.
Please go to your profile page for the forum, and look in the middle, right at the top where you will find an area titled "My Support Cases". You can reach your profile page by clicking on your name beside your post, or at the top left of this page underneath the title of the board.
Under “My Support Cases” you will find a link to the private board where you and the agent may exchange information. This should be checked on a frequent basis as the agent may be waiting for information from you before they can proceed with any actions.
To ensure you know when they have responded to you, at the top of your support case there is a drop down menu for support case options. Open that and choose "subscribe".
Please keep all correspondence regarding your issue in the private support portal.

The server farm account should not be used for other services

I have created a new SharePoint Foundation 2013 Farm. I only used the Farm Configuration Wizard to create the Search Service Application, all other aspects of the Farm was created using PowerShell.
The SharePoint Health Analyzer is reporting the following error:
Title: The server farm account should not be used for other services.
Severity: 1 - Error
Category: Security
Explanation: DOMAIN\FARM_ACCOUNT, the account used for the SharePoint timer service and the central administration site, is highly privileged and should not be used for any other services on any machines in the server farm. The following services were
found to use this account: Distributed Cache Service(Windows Service)
Remedy: Browse to
http://centraladminsite:port/_admin/FarmCredentialManagement.aspx and change the account used for the services listed in the explanation. For more information about this rule, see "http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=142685".
Now I understand how to change the account used to run the Distributed Cache Service, but my query is what account should I use in the least privelage model? I have setup the following 6 accounts as per TechNet guidelines (Link)
and am not sure if one of these accounts should be used or if another account is required:
SQL Server service account
Setup user account
Server farm account
SharePoint Server Search service account
Default content access account
Application pool identity
After reviewing the TechNet article again, I don't fully understand the section titled "Service application accounts". Is the article advising me to create a seperate account for each row in the table? e.g. 1 account for Business Data Connectivity
Service, a different account for "Application Discovery and Load Balancer Service", another account for "App management" and another account for "Distributed Cache", so 4 extra accounts if I choose to install all of these services
within the Farm?
Also, what does the article mean when it says "Plan one set of an application pool and proxy group for each service application that you plan to implement."? How do I go about doing this?
Kevin Evans

After reviewing the TechNet article again, I don't fully understand the section titled "Service application accounts". Is the article advising me to create a seperate account for each row in the table? e.g. 1 account for Business Data Connectivity Service,
a different account for "Application Discovery and Load Balancer Service", another account for "App management" and another account for "Distributed Cache", so 4 extra accounts if I choose to install all of these services within the Farm?
Inder: Yes, It is suggested to have multiple service account for each service application. This increases security and dependencyof 1 account on multiple Service applications. Like below
SQL Server service
Local System account (default)
Setup user
Member of the Administrators group on the local computer
Server farm
Network Service (default)
No manual configuration is necessary.
SharePoint Server Search Service
By default, this account runs as the Local System account.
If you want to crawl remote content by changing the default content access account or by using crawl rules, change this to a domain user account. If you do not change this account to a domain user account, you cannot change the default content access account
to a domain user account or add crawl rules to crawl this content. This restriction is designed to prevent elevation of privilege for any other process running as the Local System account.
Default Content Access
No manual configuration is necessary if this account is only crawling local farm content. If you want to crawl remote content by using crawl rules, change this to a domain user account, and apply the requirements listed for a server farm.
Content Access
Same requirement as the default content access account.
Profile import Default Access
Same requirements as server farm.
Excel Services Unattended Service
Must be a domain user account.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc263445%28v=office.15%29.aspx
Also, what does the article mean when it says "Plan one set of an application pool and proxy group for each service application that you plan to implement."? How do I go about doing this?
Inder: Each service account has a application pool and you can plan to use same application pool for multiple
service accounts if required. These application pool are then consumed by proxy connection
of each service application. On service application pool, you can see all the service applications and its proxy connection.
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

Question : Service Accounts for SQL Server 2012

Hello,
I am planning to create AD accounts for SQL Server 2012 services that will be installed on Windows 2012 server.
I was reading the following
Configure Windows Service Accounts and Permissions
and
Windows Privileges and Rights
Is there a recommendation / document that would list that assocation of SQL Server Services with Actvie Directory service accounts / privileges required for installation and starting the services.
Isn't it recommended to create separate account for every service and they should not be local accounts ?
Hope to hear soon as to what industry standards are being followed for production systems ?
Thank you very much in advance.
Regards
Nikunj

From MSDN:
Each service in SQL Server represents a process or a set of processes to manage authentication of SQL Server operations with Windows. Each service can be configured to use its own service account. This facility is exposed
at installation. SQL Server provides a special tool, SQL Server Configuration Manager, to manage the services configuration.
When choosing service accounts, consider the principle of least privilege. The service account should have exactly the privileges that it needs to do its job and no more privileges. You also need to consider account isolation; the service accounts should
not only be different from one another, they should not be used by any other service on the same server. Do not grant additional permissions to the SQL Server service account or the service groups.
From Glen Berry's Blog:
You should request that a dedicated domain user account be created for use by the SQL Server service. This should just be a regular, domain account with no special rights on the domain. You do not need or want this account to be a local admin on the machine
where SQL Server will be installed. The SQL Server setup program will grant the necessary rights on the machine to that account during installation.
You will also want a separate, dedicated domain user account for the SQL Server Agent service. If you are going to be installing and using other SQL Server related services such as SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS), SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS),
or SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS), you will want dedicated domain accounts for each service. The reason you want separate accounts for each service is because they require different rights on the local machine, and having separate accounts is both more
secure and more resilient, since a problem with one account won’t affect all of the SQL Server Services.
Depending on your organization, getting these domain accounts created could take anywhere from minutes to weeks to complete, so make sure to allow time for this. For each one of these accounts, you will need their logon credentials for the SQL Server setup
program. You are going to want to make sure that the accounts don’t have a temporary password that must be changed during the next login. If they are set up that way, make sure to change them to use a strong password, and record this information in a secure
location.
Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue
Please Mark This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue
Thanks,
Shashikant

Do we need separate Unattended service account for each SharePoint Server 2013 BI service applications?

SharePoint 2013 - I'm planning to use 'unattended service account' method of Secure Store Service - for Excel, Performance Point and Visio services. I'm about to create Active directory accounts for them.
Question: Do we need separate Active directory accounts for each service
DomainName\ExcelUnattendedAccount
DomainName\PPSUnattendedAccount
DomainName\VisioUnattendedAccount
(or)
Can I have just one Active Directory account DomainName\SharePointUnattendedAccount ?
Are there any drawbacks having a single account? Any best practice around this? For all the three services the data sources are going to be the same.
Subash.S

Security is the only reason you would separate accounts (as these accounts must have access to the source data). There should be no other drawbacks.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Corporate icloud account for iphone remote wipe

Hi,
We are about to purchase 150 iphones for members of staff (field workers) and we would like to be able to maintain these phones in Icloud for purpose of remote wiping of devices if any go astray, stolen etc.
Is there option for corporate accounts for such services ? Is there a cost ? Can all 150 iphone be on same account so "point, select phone and remote wipe" ?
If icloud cannot do this, can anyone suggest anything else. We are not using Office365 or BES, so those options are out of the window.
Many thanks
Julian

Is there option for corporate accounts for such services ?
Suggest you contact Apple for info. These are user to user forums, and you are not addressing Apple by posting here.

Being charged for cancelled service

I tried posting on your fb page and I don't see it there yet. So I'll try this -- I just got my bill today and saw a $14.99 monthly charge for World Plan 300. This is the plan I got in June 2013 for ONE MONTH while my children were travelling in Europe. I requested one month, was actually pro-rated for just the time they were there (which was 3 weeks) , and in July 2013 I called back to make sure the charge was removed. I was assured it had been. Should I check my bill carefully? Yes of course. BUT, your representative told me the charge was removed and it wasn't! So, they lied or are incompetent. I paid for this service in Aug/Sept/Oct/Nov and Dec. Are you kidding me? $75 for something I NEVER used and had cancelled? I asked your phone rep tonight and she assured me it was cancelled. Well, the man on the phone in July told me it was cancelled, too. Who do I believe? I asked her tonight to connect me to someone who can credit my account for the service I cancelled and she said it was not possible. Not possible to get back the money for something you didn't cancel?? This is shameful.
Any check of my account will show when the service was ordered, when I used my home phone to call Europe, and when I stopped using it. I am disapointed that your company is satisfied with continuing to charge me for a service I had every reason to think was cancelled. You TOLD me it was cancelled. I added several Premium TV cable choices in August so the fact that the bill was higher didn't really register.
You have one deeply disapointed customer in me.
Rose

I HAVE NEVER BEEN AS DISRESPECTED AS I HAVE BEEN BY VERIZON TODAY!!!!
I moved from MD TWO YEARS AGO and cancelled my bundled services (Phone, internet, and cable), but apparently someone at Verizon left the internet service on...I wasn't getting a bill and had Verizon service installed in my new home in TX, so I didn't think anything of it. When I recently ran my credit report, I noticed a negative from Verizon, when I called to investigate, after a 40 minute call, I was told I had to call the Finance department the next day to arrange payment for the $1100 I owed for the 23 months of internet service that they'd been charging me for.....
My first call started at 7am (PST)....after being told I was routed to the wrong department and transferred FOUR TIMES over an hour, I finally reached a supervisor who told me they would call me back....yeah right
So, when I called back this evening, and was transferred three more times, hung up on, put on hold (only to wait and then be disconnected), I reached an extremely rude "customer service" agent, who told me she would do me the courtesy of knocking off three months of the 23 month bill, but that I would be responsible for the rest, because she didn't see and record of a request being made to disconnect the service.
I REPEAT!!!!! BUNDLE SERVICE!!!!!! CABLE WAS CUT OF IN MARCH OF 2012!!!!!! PHONE WAS CUT OFF IN MARCH OF 2012!!!! WHY WOULDN'T THE INTERNET HAVE BEEN CUT OFF AS WELL?????????
i AM EXTREMELY FRUSTRATED, ANGRY, AND I'VE NOW SPENT OVER 2.5 HOURS ON THE PHONE WITH VERIZON WITH NO END TO THIS NIGHTMARE IN SIGHT!!!!
CUSTOMER SER VICE DOES NOT MEAN ANSWERING THE PHONE AND PUTTING PEOPLE ON HOLD OVER AND OVER AGAIN. IT DOES NOT MEAN TELLING A CUSTOMER, "I CAN'T HELP YOU"...
IT MEANS HELPING THE CUSTOMER!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Looking for Web Services Toolkits

I'm completely new to Web Services and I need to build client applications for some existing web services and I have some questions:
1) I have heard that things called "toolkits" are what I need to create and run client applications for web services. Is this correct?
2) Can anyone tell me some of the more common and reliable toolkits?
Thanks.

EasyWebservice at http://www.acelet.com/super/SuperWebservice/index.html
You can get all available services from WSDL and invoke them by clicking on Swing windows. You can export them and schedule the task using SuperScheduler at http://www.acelet.com/super/SuperScheduler/index.html or SuperWatchdog at http://www.acelet.com/super/SuperWatchdog/index.html.
The standard perpetual license is free.

Default GL account (cost element) for external service contracts

Hi everybody,
question about GL being defaulted from contract for external services
The requirement is to have GL (cost element) being defined per service sub item defaulting to work order. Account assignment is unknown, because the costs might be settled later to cost center or AFE or else.
You could default cost element either through material group (which doesn't enable cost element to contract) or with account assignment category 'K' or 'F' which do not suit, cause the former requires cost center, that is unknown yet, whereas the latter requires assignment to order which doesn't make sense at all. Theoretically, it could be done with acc assignment cat 'U' , but cost element is not enabled with that category..
I was assuming that cost center which you are required to enter along with cost element while creating service sub item referring to some sort of internal accounting. The system also requires service sub item acc assignment category being aligned with requisition (which is 'F') and would in fact create PR referrencing actual work order number. But still, doesn't it make sense having contract referencing another order.. Also, we don't use default values for PM ext operation data.
So, the question is how to accomplish the requirement with Unknown assignment category? what is the point of defining cost center in the contract in given circumstances? Is there any work around exists?
Thanks in advance
Sergey

Hi,
Try this: IMG -> Plant Maintenance and Customer Service -> Maintenance and Service Processing -> Maintenance and Service Orders -> Functions and Settings for Order Types -> Create Default Value Profiles for External Procurement.
After that assign it to order type: Default Values for Task List Data and Profile Assignments.
Regards,
Rogério Reis

Wrong GL account defaulted for Unplanned services in Service Entry sheet.

Dear Experts,
We create a Service PR with Acct asst - K & Item Cat - D, for which we enter Cost center, Order No. & GL account. We maintain it as Unplanned Service with Value Limits. When we create A PO wrt the above PR the GL account is defaulted corretly in PO. But when i enter Service entry sheet for above PO for Unplanned Service . System defaults a different GL account automatically. That differs from the existing one in PR & PO. User posts it directly, since it is done wrt PO without checking. How can the defaults of wrong GL account be avoided for Unplanned Services?
Thanks & regards
Chandan

Hi,
In Service PO, if some one By mistake Put the wrong G/L but u can change the G/L while SES.
Educate the SES person to note the proper G/L or assign a release streatgy for SES with give final release authority should check the proper G/l or cost center.
We have this solution as SAP is not able to reply on this front
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

G/L Account for Extension Service PO Value In-Correct

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for