G/L account is not defined in company code

Hello,
When I try to release an invoice in accounting, there is an error "G/L account is not defined in company code ".
Does anyone knows the possible cause of these error?
Thanks

Hi,
Go to VKOA , Check whether you have assigned the correct G/L account or not .
Secondly if it is correct go to FS00 and extend the G/L Account.
For this you can take the help of FI consultant or ask him to create it . Once this is done than go to VFX3 and release the document for accounting.
Hope this will help you !!
Regards,,
Krishna O

Similar Messages

  • Vendor X in  not defined in Company code  Y

    Hi Guys,
    I did the setting in OBYA (intercompany settings) for the two company codes X and Y. However, when I am psoting the doc by FB01 getting the error
    "Vendor X in  not defined in Company code  Y". In OBYA, it show the setting.
    thnks

    hi,
    getting this error. What to do
    Consolidated companies 64 and 000065 are different
    Message no. F5080
    Diagnosis
    The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected document type for all line items. In this case at least two different companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does not belong to a company are stated.
    Procedure
    If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please correct the entered account.

  • Screen layout is not defined for company code ZVVV

    Hi
    I am creating CUSTOMER MASTER in XD01
    I am getting an error like "Screen layout is not defined for company code ZVVV"
    Can any one help?

    hi,
    this is to inform you that,
    check whether
    in SPRO - fin Accounting New - accounts receivable and accounts payable - customer accounts - master data - preparations for creating master data - Define Screen Layout per Company Code (Customers)
    please check whether is *  = Default field status.
    please check and update.
    balajia

  • Idoc Status 51 - Vendor not defined in company code

    Hi All
    I'm having an error when performing intercompany stock transfer. The system creates an idoc but unable to post the subsequent document due to the error " VENDOR NOT DEFINED IN COMPANY CODE XXXX"- Status 51.  I have checked over and over ahain but everything looks ok. Could sme1 let me know what I could be missing please
    Thanks a lot
    Edited by: Joe Ujoh on Jul 22, 2008 5:27 PM

    Hi Joe,
    You said you checked everything again and again and is OK; to start with, does the vendor exist in CoCd - pl. check using T code XK03 and see if you have anything in Company Code data.

  • Vendor not defined in company code

    Hi,
    I have problem, one of vendor not defined in company code.
    I already check table LFB1, no entry found in that table.
    Please advice how to solve this issue.
    Thanks
    Moderator: Please, avoid asking basic questions

    hi,
    if it is not created you can create it by fk01,
    regards,
    raj
    Edited by: subramanyan1985 on Dec 14, 2010 10:19 AM

  • G/L account does not exist in company code

    Hi,
    When posting a GR (movement type 101) via MIGO one of my users ran into above error message:
    G/L account 300000 does not exist in company code PFNA.
    I first checked the material valuation and found out that it was incorrect.
    After the material valuation in the master data was adjusted, I executed MIGO again, but I still end up with the same error message: G/L account 300000 does not exist in company code PFNA.
    Tried to add a line to the PO, even created a new PO for the same material / plant: same result.
    Did the simulation in OMWB for material / plant combination:
    - old valuation class: 300000
    - new valuation class: 340000
    Also in OBYC same GL accounts are related to BSX. Another GL account 440000 can be found in WRX (but is of no impact here).
    So it seems like although material master was updated, still the old valuation class is getting called to determine the account.
    Anyone any ideas?
    Thanks in advance!
    Geert

    Hi Amol,
    Thanks again for your input!
    Meanwhile I have received the material via MB1A movement type 202 and put the PO item on Delivery Completed.
    This was really a system bug as I had another PO and material (100% same situation including error message) for which the MIGO worked after the valuation class got changed in the material master.
    Thanks a lot for your help!
    Regards,
    Geert

  • Vendor is not defined in Company code

    I created a vendor and a new material.
    For that material from the above vendor i created a PO and received. Now i am trying to create an invoice. It is giving the following error:
    No master record was created in company code "3000" for vendor number "SUPER".
    The systen gave the Solution as
    "Maintain the vendor master record "SUPER" in company code "3000" or correct the account number."
    Can anyone please tell me how can i do this ?
    Thanks in advance.
    Madhu

    YOu have crreated vendor but not for company code data
    you might have created vendor using MK01
    use xk01 and extend same vendor for company code data then you wont see this error.

  • 140000 account was not in the company code

    my question is reconsilation account 1,40,000  is used for create customer (xd01),the account is not in the perticular coman code.i am  trying FS00 but not for use .please advise me in different way

    Hi
    In FS00 create that G/L account for that company code
    regards
    Prashanth

  • While creating sales order got error version "0" is not defined for company

    Hi,
    i got a error  while creating a sales order(va01) ,i got an error
    saying that "version 0(zero) is not defined for company code
    if there is any solution please provide....
    Thanks&regards
    kishore kumar

    Go to TCODE:OKEQ
    1)select version 0 here and ext select settings for each fiscal year under controlling area settings
    2)give your controlling area XXXX and version 0 then enter
    3)select new entries maintain data for new year 2008.
    Hope this will give u
    Sri

  • PO created instead posting block set & vendor not extended to company code!

    Dear friends,
    I have a vendor created for a purchasing organisation in  a company code. there are two problems that i am facing.
    1) I have  blocked  a particular vendor completely. Even then system is allowing to create the PO using this vendor.
    2) This vendor has been created for a particular company code & has not been extended to another company code. Even then it is allowing to create the PO using the vendor centrally blocked for creating purchase order in another company code.
    There is a service PR specifying this vendor as desired vendor & the vendor is ticked for auto PO. Could this be a problem? but i think even then it should not allow to create PO that too for a different company code.
    Thanks & Regards
    Tasleem Arif

    1) I have blocked a particular vendor completely. Even then system is allowing to create the PO using this vendor.
    Answer:  While creation Purchase order, purchase orgnization mandatory for vendor,  if vendor blocked at company code level means system will not check Company code at the time of PO creation. here in PO creation use of company code is to recognise Currency of the company code.
    2) This vendor has been created for a particular company code & has not been extended to another company code. Even then it is allowing to create the PO using the vendor centrally blocked for creating purchase order in another company code.
    Answer: While creation of Purchase order, Comapny code is used for only currency recognisation , system will not check vendor is created for comapny code or not? but vendor should at Purchase org level.
    If vendor is not defined at company code , then it will give an error at the time of invoice only. not at PO level.
    At  PO level Purchase orgnisation is very important
    Regards
    Mahesh Naik.

  • Error G/L Account is not defined in Chart of Account INT

    Hi,
    I have create a company code by doing copy of SG01 in transaction EC01.
    I have also create a vendor under the newly created company code. When i try to do a testing in FB60 transaction it prompt me an error : G/L Account is not defined in Chart of Account INT.
    Did i miss out anything? How to resolve this issue?
    Best Regards,
    Rayden

    Hi Supriya,
    I have check the T-Code FSP0. It display as follow. it seem that the Chart of Account INT is there.
    [FSP0 Screenshot|http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s248/evil_lord81/Untitled-1.jpg]
    Regards,
    Rayden
    Edited by: Rayden on Feb 25, 2008 3:05 PM
    Edited by: Rayden on Feb 25, 2008 3:06 PM

  • G/L account  is not defined in chart of accounts

    Hello Experts,
    Can someone solve my problem. I have created an expense account in my Chart of Account (FSP0) and the same COA is assigned to my Co.Cd in OBY6. When I tried to post to this G/L account ( FB60 - Vendor Invoice posting ),  I got the following error.
    G/L account  is not defined in chart of accounts INT
    Message no. F5507
    Diagnosis
    The general master data of the G/L account  is not maintained in the chart of accounts
    INT.
    System Response
    Error.
    Procedure
    Please correct your entry or create the master record.
    I am not sure if I am missing anything.  Is there anyway to extend the G/L account that is created in COA to company code level apart from assigning the COA to company code in OBY6.
    Any help will be duly rewarded and appreciated.
    Regards,
    Sriram

    Hi,
    A single chart of accounts can be used by multiple company codes.
    If I have 20 company codes using the same chart of accounts in the system for which i need to create GL accounts. Instead of creating the GL accounts for 20 company codes individually  at COA level and Company code level, I can create at company code level only. The COA level will remain similar/constant for all the company codes.
    Hope Im clear
    Thanks
    Aravind
    <b>Assihn points if useful</b>

  • "Content account is not defined" error while trying to checkin a document

    Hi, all
    I am running ECM integration samples included on SDK (included on file ContentIntegrationSuite_10gR3_20081218.zip, folder "oracle-cis-10g\samples\CodeExamples\src\java\com\stellent\cis\sdk\samples"), and I got the error "Content account is not defined. Unable to validate user security." when running the ChekinFile.java sample.
    I could successfully run the ServerInfo.java with no problems, and I expected to run the other example as easily as that.
    Is there any configuration I must change on ECM to run this sample?
    The stack trace follows. Thanks in advance.
    com.stellent.cis.client.command.CommandException: Content item '1256149797205Content-Id-SDK' was not successfully checked in. Content account is not defined. Unable to validate user security.
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.impl.SCSCommand.executeRequest(SCSCommand.java:338)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.impl.SCSCommand.execute(SCSCommand.java:222)
         at com.stellent.cis.client.command.impl.services.CommandExecutorService.executeCommand(CommandExecutorService.java:57)
         at com.stellent.cis.client.command.impl.CommandFacade.executeCommand(CommandFacade.java:158)
         at com.stellent.cis.client.command.impl.BaseCommandAPI.invokeCommand(BaseCommandAPI.java:84)
         at com.stellent.cis.client.api.scs.document.checkin.impl.SCSDocumentCheckinAPI.checkinFileStream(SCSDocumentCheckinAPI.java:707)
         at com.stellent.cis.sdk.samples.checkin.CheckinFile.execute(CheckinFile.java:87)
         at com.stellent.cis.sdk.samples.checkin.CheckinFile.main(CheckinFile.java:64)
    Caused by: com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.SCSRequestException: Content item '1256149797205Content-Id-SDK' was not successfully checked in. Content account is not defined. Unable to validate user security.
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestProcessor.checkBinderForErrors(SCSRequestProcessor.java:357)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestProcessor.validateResponse(SCSRequestProcessor.java:273)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestProcessor.processRequest(SCSRequestProcessor.java:118)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestFilterChain.doRequestFilter(SCSRequestFilterChain.java:61)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.stream.SCSOptimizedPublishFilter.handleRequest(SCSOptimizedPublishFilter.java:128)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestFilterChain.doRequestFilter(SCSRequestFilterChain.java:58)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.stream.SCSOptimizedRetrieveFilter.handleRequest(SCSOptimizedRetrieveFilter.java:250)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestFilterChain.doRequestFilter(SCSRequestFilterChain.java:58)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.rewrite.SCSRewriteURLFilter.handleRequest(SCSRewriteURLFilter.java:140)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestFilterChain.doRequestFilter(SCSRequestFilterChain.java:58)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.cache.impl.SCSServiceCacheFilter.handleRequest(SCSServiceCacheFilter.java:104)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestFilterChain.doRequestFilter(SCSRequestFilterChain.java:58)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestExecutorProxy.execute(SCSRequestExecutorProxy.java:105)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.impl.SCSCommand.executeViaProxy(SCSCommand.java:353)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.impl.SCSCommand.executeRequest(SCSCommand.java:335)
         ... 7 more

    Hi
    Issue is caused with the way parameters are passed from CIS 8.x onwards where when not giving a parameter that is a required one then it has to be set to blank. Like in the case for dDocAccount setting the value to blank string (i.e. "") would successfully check in the document.
    dDocAccount is a required additional paramter that needs to be supplied when checking in contents when UseAccounts=true is set in the config.cfg of the CS.
    From the CS checkin page when not specifying the Account it is set as blank which is why the the checkin goes through fine.
    This was not the case with CIS 7.6.1 where dDocAccount was not required to pass as parameter even if UseAccounts=true is set in the config.
    In case checkins have to be done without giving the Account then add the code for setting the dDocAccount to a blank string (i.e. "") and then recompile the java code and execute the it.
    Reason why CIS 7.6.1 did not show this behaviour is since CIS would set that (the value for account parameter) in the binder and pass it to the CS.
    Hope this helps
    Srinath

  • Inventory account is not defined [Goods Receipt PO - Rows - Warehouse Code

    Hai All,
    When I copied from PO to GR PO the below said error accord. G/L are set by  Item level.
    General Setting > Inventory Tab > Set G/L Accounts as : *by item level*
    Error:
    Inventory account is not defined [Goods Receipt PO - Rows - Warehouse Code][line: 1] ,  [Message 173-77]
    Please provide me a solution.
    Regards
    Sudarshan

    hiii Sudarshan
           if you have set g/l a/c by item then go to
    administration-setup-inventory (stock management)-warehouse-(your particular warehouse) -accounting
                    assign g/l account ,
                                       hope this helps you
                                                      Good Luck
                                                                     RIYAZ

  • G/L account is not define in chart of account F5507 error in MIRO

    Hi,
      While doing MIRO as soon as We enter the PO number system gives the error message F5507 G/L account is not define in chart of account F5507,  I have check the G/L account in FS00 it isproperly mainatin also in COCD data Chart of account , controlling area, FM area are propley maiantain also message setting chekc in In OBMSG and OBA5  for application area F5 message 507  it not present in that but still I am getting this error in production server only.  in development I have with same material and G/L; account  but in development there is no problem system is not giving any error message in development.
      What can be the problem.
    regards,
    zafar

    HI,
    AS you check G/L is there in in chart of account .Which vendor you created the purchase order?  Go to vendor master (XK03)  for which you created PO&  check RECONSILIATION ACCOUNT. Now check the RECONSILIATION ACCOUNT (FS00) is there or not in chart of account
    Regards,
    Biju K

Maybe you are looking for