G router no faster than B router

I had a Linksys Wireless B router for a couple years and it finally died.
I replaced it with the WRT54G just the other day.
I am running wireless.
My problem is, the G is no faster than my old B!
I have the mode set to G-only and I am not running any encryption.
I have a 6Mbps internet connection, but I'm only getting 2.8 Mbps on my WRT54G with no encryption. This is the same speed I got on my B router!!!!
What gives?????
P.S. I am getting these speeds while my PC is right next to the router - so it's not a signal issue.

Yes 6 is slower than 54... Even if you had a 54Mbs internet connection you will still get only half that wirelessly.
Interference is a big factor - Other devices ranging from your neighbor's handheld phone to a nearby gas station's wireless credit card checking system could interfere with your wireless network card's speed. When two devices use the same frequency in the same area, it can become more difficult for one or both of them to communicate successfully. When a wireless card can't communicate at top speed, it slows down until it can communicate with the access point at a slower speed.
I have a 6MB connection wired to my router which is wired to my desktop and my 3 wireless devices get to 3.2MB. Its been that way from day one and its normal. Search the net, there are all kinds of discussions on this topic.
Good Luck - Peace

Similar Messages

Can a N router provide faster speed to client than modem speed?

Excuse my off-thread basis, but the knowledge I need will be here I felt.
I have a 2.5m download speed from my DSL modem and am using an 802 -G router to serve 2 clients. If I bought a 802 - N router could it actually server the clients faster than the incoming speed my DSL modem provides?
Thanks

Bob Timmons wrote:
By "2.5m", I assume that you mean 2.5 Mbps. An 802.11g router is capable of 54 Mbps. An 802.11n wireless router is capable of 130 Mbps at 2.4 GHz and up to 300 Mbps at 5 GHz.
The the speed on your local network is much faster than your download speed from the internet.
Hi Bob, thanks for taking the time.
Yes, I did mean 2.5mbps. And I understand that the link/speed from router to client is faster than from modem to router.
What I'm trying to understand is at what point in modem download speed does it make sense to upgrade to an N router? Can you explain this, keeping all numbers in a laymen's context? I don't understand the Mbps at x gigahertz ratios, or their meaning. Thanks
I don't understand why one would need an N router, even with a 10Mbps modem download speed? If the bottle neck is 10Mbps, what does it matter what the router serves to the client?
( I don't need wider wireless coverage, so I'm only talking in terms of how fast a web page will load, for example. )
Thanks

Why is Time Capsule Internet Slower than Belkin Router?

My Time Capsule is conneted via Ethernet to my Belkin Wireless router and is serving as my wireless backup drive.
I am extending the Time Capsule "network" via an AirPort Express in order to boost the signal over distance.
However I find consistently that when I log into the Time Capsule, my internet access is significantly slower than if I access it over the Belkin wireless router, whether I use the Airport Express or not.
I've also found that logging into the Belkin from my Mac to do my Time Capsule backups seem to run considerably faster and have fewer "stalls" than when going direct to the Time Capsule, which also seems quite strange.
Is there some reason for this? Something in my settings conflicting? One would assume that with the Mac going directly to the Time Capsule which is connected directly via Ethernet, that it would be faster than going through the 3rd party Belkin router, or at least no different.

Let me just get it clear..
Belkin is main router..
TC is bridged and plugged into it by ethernet.
Express is doing extend wireless to the TC over 5ghz.
Now there is a couple of misunderstandings..
The Time Capsule is set for the 5GHz band ONLY to avoid conflict with the numerous 2.4GHz radios in close proximity, including the Belkin, automatic channel selection.
TC is not able to shut off the 2.4ghz.. even if you don't use it.. it will work.
So it is better to set it up and use it on fixed wireless channel out of the way. Indeed if it is some distance from the belkin rather than right next to it.. you can use roaming network setup. Both Belkin and TC use the same ssid ie wireless name.. same security ie WPA2 AES = WPA2 Personal. Same security password.
But different channel.. IMHO it is better to lock the wireless channel. Set TC to 11 and belkin to 1.
Wireless channel on 5ghz is less of an issue but I recommend lower end channels.. ie <40.
Extending wireless on 5ghz is often poor.. the range is actually bad.. and link speed can be worse than using 2.4ghz.. so I would carefully test the speed using wireless on 2.4ghz and then on 5ghz. .If possible only use 5ghz on single hop up close to the TC.
Any wireless that does double hop.. ie TC--Express--computer will go at half the speed of TC--computer, if they link at the same speed. This is caused by double hop wireless being highly inefficient way to extend wireless.
If the TC is faster by ethernet via the Belkin than via the TC I would find that difficult to follow and you will need to give me exact model number of the belkin.
That the belkin 2.4ghz wireless is faster than the TC is no surprise.. apple limit wireless to N lite at 2.4ghz.. whereas the belkin is probably 300mbit. And better signal.
You have heaps of testing to do.

Can we write more than one routing rule in a RS?

Can we write more than one routing rule in a RS?

You can specify multiple routing rules for a single operation of a routing service. If no filter is applied, they are all executed. For routing rules with filters, only the target operations for which the filter condition holds are invoked. Priority is based on the order in which they appear in the routing rules window.
Ronald

Can you have more than one router attached to your computer?

an you have more than one router attached to your computer?

Yes. (One of my systems has music purchased from two different iTunes accounts in its iTunes library.)

Can I have more than one routing status 4 for one product?

Can I have more than one routing status 4 for one product in R/3? What impact will have this routings on Financial departament?
I am working in PP and | want to implement perfect planification, but I don't know if I have 2 routings for each equipment.
And also each routings status 4 will have his production version, can financial to do corect calculation?
Thank you!
V

Hi Mangalraj,
My question is about the impact on financial calculation. I know I can have more 2 or more than that active routings status 4.
I want to know how the financial SAP guys decide which routing to chose when they run the final month calculation. Or can they make a sum of all routings I have?
For example if I have:
- 3 SMT line where I produce one product. So, I want to have dedicate routing for each line and production version.
In this case if we produce:
200 part on the first line wich have machine time equal with 4h/100pcs
800 part on the second line with have machine time equal with 2h/100pcs
on last one we don't produce now but this have machine time equal with 5h/100pcs.
I want also to mention that all operations in all routings are marked CostRelevncy.
So, the production planner will have the perfect planning But how is this for financial SAP specialist? Is easy to manage?
Thanks,
Versor

Connect more than 3 router with WDS

hi,can i connect more than 3 router with WDS,in need to connect 8 wifi router with wireless, plz help me,Tnx

Its not possible you can try the same with access points.

The error console, I clear it and 4 minutes later it has 100's of yellow, pink & blue message lines in it, without me making 100's of clicks or commands ?? .... Other than the error console filling up faster than a superman, it seems to be working fine.

The error console, I clear it and 4 minutes later it has 100's of yellow, pink & blue message lines in it, without me making 100's of clicks or commands ?? .... Other than error console filling up faster than a superman, it seems to be working fine. why does it register so many yellow, pink & blue warnings, errors, etc. ???
This happens no matter where I am browsing, yahoo, google, mail or news. Clearing the console seems to help with the speed of FF after an hour or so of browsing, it slows down terribly and if not cleared and or shut down and relaunching FF, both actually, it is painfully slow, like dial-up.

Hi Mac Attack,
My computer will not disconnect from the internet. It seems to find a clone router and continues even when I shut down and unplug my my own home iy
Your main question was 'chopped' in the title. Please reply in the body of a reply box with the full question and anything you have tried. And no, the long report was not helpful .
If the same website is opening each time you launch a browser (Safari?) hold down the shift key as you launch to prevent previous pages from opening.
Have a look at your settings in Safari > Preferences. Especially General and Privacy.
Reset Safari to remove cookies and other stored data.
System Preferences > General
Have a look at your settings in System Preferences > Security & Privacy.
Call back with more questions.
Regards,
Ian

Why is my MacBook downloading faster than my new Imac?

I have a two year old Macbook; 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM with about 30GB left of memory. I also just purchased, from apple, a 27" Imac; 2.8 GHz Intel Core i7 with 4 GB 1067 MHz DDR3. and have just under 850GB left. The Macbook is running on 10.5.8 and the Imac is on 10.6.3.
My issue is that when i download/stream video to my Imac it takes a substantial amount of time. I love to watch movies, tv shows, ect, on my Imac. I was disappointed by how slow the downloads would take. So I set up my macbook right in front of the Imac to compare the speeds. I went to the Movie Trailers section on apple.com and I clicked on The Last Airbender 1080p (149MB) at the same time for both computers (on WiFi of the same network). My macbook finished the download 5 minutes faster than the Imac. I then tried the 42MB version with a minute difference with the Macbook. I then went to youtube and it was almost the same speed. I tried Itunes and it was about the same speed as well. I then did an internet speed test with both and got these results:
Macbook: Download 18.45Mb/s, Upload 2.28Mb/s, Ping 93
IMac: Download 20.88Mb/s, Upload 2.3Mb/s, Ping 89
I don't know if any of this information helps or if anyone will even read this far but the apple store is extremely far from my house and would try almost anything to fix this issue. My questions are:
1) Is this a known issue that has a fix, if so how do i fix it?
2) Is this possibly a faulty computer that i would have to return?
3) Is this the way it's supposed to operate and if I don't like it take it back
Thanks in advance for anyone who even reads this post.

You may also want to check your router. Some routers use a priority bandwidth feature that will dedicate more bandwidth to one machine. If for some reason the macbook's download was started earlier than the imac's, then this might be part of the discrepancy. There are a lot of factors to think about when it comes to wifi bandwidth.
I do agree with the one comment about testing one computer at a time instead of simultaneously.
Also, when you said you have the movies from the Macbook on your iMac, can you elaborate? If you are using a shared library, then your iMac is going to be using part of your download speed for updates to your shared itunes library, where your Macbook is only going to be uploading the list. If I am incorrect in my understanding of the sharing of iTunes library, someone please let me know.

Why is iMovie 5 x faster than AP3?

I noticed that slideshow exports in AP3 seemed to take a long time and did a test with iMoive 09. I exported the exact same slideshow of 60 pictures and 1 song from both iMoive and AP3. The iMovie export was 5 times faster than the AP3 export.
Why is this and can anything be done to speedup AP3 slideshow exports?
I have a fairly quick Mac, 2 x 2.26 Ghz Quad-Core Intel Xeon, 16 meg of ram, ATI Radeon HD 4870.
Any thoughts?
Ken

You may also want to check your router. Some routers use a priority bandwidth feature that will dedicate more bandwidth to one machine. If for some reason the macbook's download was started earlier than the imac's, then this might be part of the discrepancy. There are a lot of factors to think about when it comes to wifi bandwidth.
I do agree with the one comment about testing one computer at a time instead of simultaneously.
Also, when you said you have the movies from the Macbook on your iMac, can you elaborate? If you are using a shared library, then your iMac is going to be using part of your download speed for updates to your shared itunes library, where your Macbook is only going to be uploading the list. If I am incorrect in my understanding of the sharing of iTunes library, someone please let me know.

Is the Gig version really faster than the 100m version !?

I just upgraded my 100 meg AEBS to the new Gig version, and ran a quick n easy benchmark, an rsync -e ssh on a 150 meg file. The server is an iMac connected via gig-e, and the Macbook c2d is connected via 802.11n (reporting a consistant 300 mbps in network utility - about 20 feet from the router, going through 2-4 sheets of drywall). The tests were conducted in my Chicago apartment, with at least 10 detectable 2.4gHz networks, and no 5.8gHz networks that I know of.
The 802.11n 5.8gHz no backwards compatibility was by far the fastest. The fastest test I ran was 11 MBps on the copy, with 802.11a compatibility I believe was around 8, and 2.4ghz + 802.11g compatibility was around 6. I repeated all tests a few times, the results were pretty consistant.
These results suprised me, as I was really hoping for a bit faster. I could get 40 MBps on my Linux file server over gig-e to the iMac in previous tests. Unfortunately that machine is down until I get some replacement parts, so I couldn't use it to test the new AEBS. But I seem to remember getting 11 or 12 MBps with the Linux file server over the old AEBS with 100m and 5.8gHz no backwards compatiblity.
So how much of the performance non-difference is due to the iMac vs Linux file server, or the Gig-E version being no faster than the 100 meg version remains to be seen. I'm curious if anyone else has done tests.
If the router, or this 802.11n implementation is the bottleneck - folks may not want to waste their money upgrading, unless they really want that 4 port (in bridge mode) gig-e switch on the back.
Rob

That is somewhat counterintuitive, as the 802.11n connection speed is reportedly 300 mbps. I understand the implications of protocol overhead, but 70% overhead seems a bit excessive. I guess I'm curious if the bottleneck is:
- in the router backplane
- in the 802.11n protocol
- in apples implementation of 802.11(draft)n
Also - anyone else have actual benchmark data to share?
regards
Rob

Wireless speed faster than direct hookup E4200

Have high speed cable and find that the wireless speeds using Speedtest.net are faster than when hooking directly into the E4200. Do I have something set incorrectly?

Have you tried checking the cables or the specs of your LAN card?
You see, the e4200 router is a gigabit router. This means, your LAN card must also be a gigabit adapter to have a better wired connection.
"Don't fix it if it ain't broken."

Very slow network performance - with uploads faster than downloads

I just got new ISP - 100 mbps through a Cat5 line. It checks out when I run ethernet directly to a computer. However, I want a totally wireless network.
I have a Time Capsule attached by ethernet and that is my main network device. I also have two airport Xpress' to extend the network.
I am getting, on average, 16 mbps! And, upload speed is generally higher.
The Time Capsule is about 2 yrs old, but it is an "n" device.
Anybody have any idea what the problem might be? I was considering getting a new extreme and using the Time Capsule as an extender instead of the expresses because, as I understand it, the express has one band only. Would that be better? Mainly, I want to get the speed up to what it should be.
Is there some way to trouble shoot the Time Capsule?
Others in my building with D Link or Linksys routers are getting over 80 mbps wirelessly, so I know it is possible.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. I want to stay with Apple products, but if not possible I will get another brand of router.
Thanks,
Deanna

Deannanel wrote:
So, William, I got an Airport Extreme. Within 20 or so feet of it I am now getting 85 to 95 Mbps!
Great!
However, in the far reaches of the house, signal is low and I have not been able to extent network with either the Time Capsule or an Airport Express. They just won't connect.
Based on the earlier numbers you gave me, you won't be able to establish a reliable connection "in the far reaches of the house", as it's too far away from the base router. You'll either have to (1) run Ethernet to that remote unit, (2) use PowerLine units as an Ethernet extender, or (3) put the remote unit closer to the base unit.
I reset the Time Capsule a couple of times. I noticed that both devices are automatically set to channel 157.
That's a 5 GHz channel. That band can give faster throughput, but the signal strength falls off faster than in the 2.4 GHz band.
The Extreme has 2 channels - 2 and 157. I do not have the option of changing the channel on either of the other devices.
That makes sense, if they're configured to extend an existing network. They must communicate on the same channel as the base station they're extending.

My wrt310n is no faster than my wrt54gv5?

I just bought my wrt310 gigabyte router yesterday prepared to be blown away buy how fast it was with all this N connectivity Gigabyte this and gigabyte that and when I got it up and running it was no faster than my wrt54gv5 some say its even slower? So what's the deal? I thought this router was supposed to be mad fast. Is there some kind of fast button so I can see what this thing is "supposed" to do?

sabretooth wrote:
Actually.... nothing. Your old router was a 54Mbps and your wireless adapters in your computers are only 54Mbps. You must upgrade to N wireless adapters (up to 300Mbps) to use the speed of your new N router. Right now your old wireless adapter is only running in G mode (54Mbps) and your router can handle this speed. You will gain nothing from your Internet as the speed of your ISP has not changed. To get maximum speed, you have to upgrade your hardwired computers to 1Gbit cards and your wireless adapter to an N specification adapter. Sorry.
then how to you explain the range of my wrt310n being exactly the same as my wrt54gv5, and my speeds and streaming actually being slower than before. This router was advertised to be miles better than the wrt54g but I am seeing no results of that at all.

Route not showing up in routing table.

I have my core switch connecting to my router which connects to our MPLS provider. My router has a BGP default route going to the MPLS provider edge router B*   0.0.0.0/0 [20/0] via 172.30.252.78, 1w4d .... This route is not showing up in my core switch. Shouldnt it show up as an eigrp ex default route? Can anyone assist me? my routing table for each device is below. Thank you!
Router
USJONELAWTN01R#sho ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is 172.30.252.78 to network 0.0.0.0
     68.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
S       68.142.83.236 is directly connected, Null0
     198.63.196.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
S       198.63.196.103 is directly connected, Null0
     64.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
S       64.234.192.40 is directly connected, Null0
     172.26.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
D       172.26.82.0/24 [90/28416] via 172.28.82.10, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/1
                       [90/28416] via 172.28.80.10, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/0.1
                       [90/28416] via 172.28.80.9, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/0.1
D       172.26.83.0/24 [90/28416] via 172.28.82.10, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/1
                       [90/28416] via 172.28.80.10, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/0.1
                       [90/28416] via 172.28.80.9, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/0.1
D       172.26.80.0/23 [90/28416] via 172.28.82.10, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/1
                       [90/28416] via 172.28.80.10, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/0.1
                       [90/28416] via 172.28.80.9, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/0.1
     172.28.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
C       172.28.176.0/23 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.6
C       172.28.80.0/23 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.1
C       172.28.82.0/23 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/1
D       172.28.80.20/32
           [90/30720] via 172.28.176.3, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/0.6
           [90/30720] via 172.28.82.3, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/1
           [90/30720] via 172.28.80.3, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/0.1
     172.30.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 6 subnets, 2 masks
C       172.30.252.78/32 is directly connected, Multilink1
C       172.30.252.76/30 is directly connected, Multilink1
D       172.30.252.114/32
           [90/3415808] via 172.28.176.3, 4d00h, GigabitEthernet0/0.6
           [90/3415808] via 172.28.82.3, 4d00h, GigabitEthernet0/1
           [90/3415808] via 172.28.80.3, 4d00h, GigabitEthernet0/0.1
D       172.30.252.112/30
           [90/3415808] via 172.28.176.3, 4d00h, GigabitEthernet0/0.6
           [90/3415808] via 172.28.82.3, 4d00h, GigabitEthernet0/1
           [90/3415808] via 172.28.80.3, 4d00h, GigabitEthernet0/0.1
D       172.30.254.24/32
           [90/156160] via 172.28.176.3, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/0.6
           [90/156160] via 172.28.82.3, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/1
           [90/156160] via 172.28.80.3, 1w5d, GigabitEthernet0/0.1
C       172.30.254.25/32 is directly connected, Loopback10
C    192.168.202.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.1
     10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
S       10.192.254.0/24 [1/0] via 172.28.82.10, GigabitEthernet0/1
S       10.201.0.0/16 [1/0] via 172.28.82.10, GigabitEthernet0/1
S       10.200.1.0/24 [1/0] via 172.28.82.10, GigabitEthernet0/1
C    192.168.203.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.1
C    192.168.51.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.1
B*   0.0.0.0/0 [20/0] via 172.30.252.78, 1w4d
B    200.200.0.0/16 [20/0] via 172.30.252.78, 1w4d
B    201.1.0.0/16 [20/0] via 172.30.252.78, 1w4d
B    172.16.0.0/12 [20/0] via 172.30.252.78, 1w4d
B    198.30.0.0/16 [20/0] via 172.30.252.78, 1w4d
B    192.168.0.0/16 [20/0] via 172.30.252.78, 1w4d
Core Switch
TNLAW-TN1COREA# sho ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is 10.192.61.1 to network 0.0.0.0
     172.26.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
C       172.26.82.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan601
C       172.26.83.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan603
C       172.26.80.0/23 is directly connected, Vlan602
     172.28.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
D       172.28.176.0/23 [90/28416] via 172.28.82.3, 7w0d, Vlan2
                        [90/28416] via 172.28.82.2, 7w0d, Vlan2
                        [90/28416] via 172.28.80.3, 7w0d, Vlan1
                        [90/28416] via 172.28.80.2, 7w0d, Vlan1
C       172.28.80.0/23 is directly connected, Vlan1
C       172.28.82.0/23 is directly connected, Vlan2
D       172.28.80.20/32 [90/28416] via 172.28.82.3, 7w0d, Vlan2
                        [90/28416] via 172.28.80.3, 7w0d, Vlan1
     172.30.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 6 subnets, 2 masks
D       172.30.252.78/32 [90/3413504] via 172.28.82.2, 1w4d, Vlan2
                         [90/3413504] via 172.28.80.2, 1w4d, Vlan1
D       172.30.252.76/30 [90/3413504] via 172.28.82.2, 1w4d, Vlan2
                         [90/3413504] via 172.28.80.2, 1w4d, Vlan1
D       172.30.252.114/32 [90/3413504] via 172.28.82.3, 4d00h, Vlan2
                          [90/3413504] via 172.28.80.3, 4d00h, Vlan1
D       172.30.252.112/30 [90/3413504] via 172.28.82.3, 4d00h, Vlan2
                          [90/3413504] via 172.28.80.3, 4d00h, Vlan1
D       172.30.254.24/32 [90/130816] via 172.28.82.3, 7w0d, Vlan2
                         [90/130816] via 172.28.80.3, 7w0d, Vlan1
D       172.30.254.25/32 [90/130816] via 172.28.82.2, 7w0d, Vlan2
                         [90/130816] via 172.28.80.2, 7w0d, Vlan1
D    192.168.202.0/24 [90/28416] via 172.28.82.3, 7w0d, Vlan2
                      [90/28416] via 172.28.82.2, 7w0d, Vlan2
     10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 3 masks
S       10.192.254.0/24 [1/0] via 10.192.61.1, GigabitEthernet3/47
S       10.201.0.0/16 [1/0] via 10.192.61.1, GigabitEthernet3/47
S       10.200.1.0/24 [1/0] via 10.192.61.1, GigabitEthernet3/47
C       10.192.61.0/28 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet3/47
D    192.168.203.0/24 [90/28416] via 172.28.82.3, 7w0d, Vlan2
                      [90/28416] via 172.28.82.2, 7w0d, Vlan2
D    192.168.51.0/24 [90/28416] via 172.28.82.3, 7w0d, Vlan2
                     [90/28416] via 172.28.82.2, 7w0d, Vlan2
S*   0.0.0.0/0 [250/0] via 10.192.61.1, GigabitEthernet3/47

Hello,
The core switch has got a static default route pointing to 10.192.61.1. It has got a better AD value than the EIGRP routes.
Even if you are redistributing the BGP routes into EIGRP, EIGRP default route will not make it to the routing table because of the higher AD value than the static route.
However, you can view that it the EIGRP topology table. Check 'Sh ip ei topo'.
Krishna

G router no faster than B router

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for