Games slow to load after upgrade of graphics card.

I have a Compaq presario sr5123wm. Running Vista service pack 2 . Had trouble with it shutting down or freezing up while playing games or or using the internet, it seened to do it more if I tried to do more than one thing at a time. So I changed the graphics card to Radeon HD 4550 and the power supply to 400 watt. I Also cleaned the inside, ran Norton scans and ran updates. That seemed to fix the lock ups. Now when I try to load sims 2 it stops responding and when I try to play World of Warcraft it load very slowly. any suggestions?
This question was solved.
View Solution.

HI,
It would have handled 4GB. It actuall would use only @3.25 GB in a 32-bit operating system.
The advantage is the way the memory bus sees a pair of identical memory modules. Your motherboard is capable of running them as Dual channel memory. If you don't have identical memory sticks in the slots the motherboard will run them single channel mode and that creates a bit of a bottleneck and slows down your PC.
Unfortunately, you chose a non gaming video card. That is the central of the games loading slowly. The lack of memory in dual channel mode just compounds the problem.
You can bump the video up quite af ew notches with a NVIDIA GeForceGT 220 or 240 series video card. You may want to consider upgrading your PC instead of sinking funds into an older platform PC. There areplenty of games your pc is not capable of running at this stage of its lifecycle.
Best regards,
erico
****Please click on Accept As Solution if a suggestion solves your problem. It helps others facing the same problem to find a solution easily****
2015 Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience Consumer

Similar Messages

Safari slow to load after upgrading to 10.10.2

Ever since upgrading my brand new Mac to 10.10.2, Safari has been exceedingly slow to load -- sometimes refusing to load, altogether. Any help with this?

Please answer as many of the following questions as you can. You may already have answered some of them. In that case, there's no need to repeat the answers.
Back up all data before making any changes.
Have you restarted your router and your broadband device (if they're separate) since you first noticed the problem? If not, do that now and see whether there's any change.
If your browser is Safari, then from the Safari menu bar, select
Safari ▹ Preferences... ▹ Privacy ▹ Remove All Website Data
and confirm. If the Downloads button (with the icon of a downward-pointing arrow) is showing in the toolbar, click it and then click Clear in the box that appears. The download history will be removed. Any change?
If you're running OS X 10.9 or later, select the Advanced tab in the Preferences window and uncheck the box marked
Stop plug-ins to save power
Any change?
Quit and relaunch the browser. Any change?
Enable guest logins* and log in as Guest. Don't use the Safari-only “Guest User” login created by “Find My Mac.”
While logged in as Guest, you won’t have access to any of your documents or settings. Applications will behave as if you were running them for the first time. Don’t be alarmed by this behavior; it’s normal. If you need any passwords or other personal data in order to complete the test, memorize, print, or write them down before you begin.
Test while logged in as Guest. Same problem?
After testing, log out of the guest account and, in your own account, disable it if you wish. Any files you created in the guest account will be deleted automatically when you log out of it.
*Note: If you’ve activated “Find My Mac” or FileVault, then you can’t enable the Guest account. The “Guest User” login created by “Find My Mac” is not the same. Create a new account in which to test, and delete it, including its home folder, after testing.
Are any other web browsers installed, and are they the same? What about other Internet applications, such as iTunes and the App Store?
If other browsers and Internet applications are also affected, follow these instructions and test. Any change?
If Parental Controls is active for any user, please turn it off and test. Any change?
If only Safari is affected, launch the Activity Monitor application and enter "web" (without the quotes) in the search box. If a process named "Safari Web Content" is shown in red or is using more than about 5% of a CPU, select it and force it to quit by clicking the X or Quit Process button in the toolbar of the window. There may be more than one such process. Any improvement?
Follow the instructions in this support article. Any change?
Open the iCloud preference pane and uncheck the boxes marked Safari and Photos, if they're checked. Any change?
Are there any other devices on the same network that can browse the Web, and are they affected?
If you can test Safari on another network, is it the same there?
If you connect to your router with Wi-Fi and you can also connect with Ethernet, do that and turn off Wi-Fi. Any difference?

Pogo Games won't load after upgrade to Lion

Upgraded to Lion recently. Everything seems to be working okay, except that I play a lot of games on Pogo.com, and now none of the games will load. I made sure everything (Java, etc) was up to date, but none of it fixed the problem. I tried the games on both Safari and Firefox, and got the same result. Any game I try to open just says "Now Loading (Name of Game)..." and that's all it does.
I went back to an older mac that is still running Snow Leopard, and the games loaded just fine. So I figured it was an issue with Lion.
BUT... on the Snow Leopard computer, I noticed I had an old version of Firefox installed, so I upgraded that to the newest version, and now Pogo games won't load on that either! So, the problem isn't actually Lion. It's the newest versions of the browsers.
I tried contacting EA (pogo) support, but their help page is completely useless. I thought I'd check and see if anyone here has any ideas.
thanks,
Dan

I'm using Fouiny packages for a year (now it's cvs-20060621-1), as he provides ~all of them & they worked without issue ever since. Latest version's getting a bit old
EDIT : known problem with new openssl !
Finally found it here http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?p=192536#192536

Slow down Database after upgrading to 10.2.0.5

Hi
I am having performance problems after upgrading to 10.2.0.5
At the beginning I thought the problem was sga too smalle ( ini: 598M , now 1408M ) but even after recreating the database with the new value the problem remains.
I am sending reports so that someone could give me an idea.
Thanks in advance!
DETAILED ADDM REPORT FOR TASK 'TASK_240' WITH ID 240
Analysis Period: 22-JUN-2011 from 08:34:06 to 16:00:13
Database ID/Instance: 2462860799/1
Database/Instance Names: DXT/DXT
Host Name: thoracle
Database Version: 10.2.0.5.0
Snapshot Range: from 71 to 78
Database Time: 6726 seconds
Average Database Load: .3 active sessions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FINDING 1: 38% impact (2540 seconds)
SQL statements consuming significant database time were found.
RECOMMENDATION 1: SQL Tuning, 26% benefit (1763 seconds)
ACTION: Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "30rku9qg2y30j" for
possible performance improvements.
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 30rku9qg2y30j and
PLAN_HASH 2734400036
select a.owner, a.object_name, INSTR(a.object_type, :"SYS_B_00"),
:"SYS_B_01" from sys.all_objects a where a.object_type IN
(:"SYS_B_02",:"SYS_B_03") and a.status = :"SYS_B_04" and a.owner
like:"SYS_B_05"escape:"SYS_B_06" and a.object_name
like:"SYS_B_07"escape:"SYS_B_08" union all select c.owner,
c.synonym_name, INSTR(a.object_type, :"SYS_B_09"), :"SYS_B_10" from
sys.all_objects a, sys.all_synonyms c where c.table_owner = a.owner
and c.table_name = a.object_name and a.object_type IN
(:"SYS_B_11",:"SYS_B_12") and a.status = :"SYS_B_13" and c.owner
like:"SYS_B_14"escape:"SYS_B_15" and c.synonym_name
like:"SYS_B_16"escape:"SYS_B_17" union all select distinct b.owner,
CONCAT(b.package_name, :"SYS_B_18" || b.object_name),
min(b.position), max(b.overload) from sys.all_arguments b where
b.package_name IS NOT NULL and b.owner
like:"SYS_B_19"escape:"SYS_B_20" and b.package_name
like:"SYS_B_21"escape:"SYS_B_22" group by b.owner,
CONCAT(b.package_name, :"SYS_B_23" || b.object_name) union all select
distinct c.owner, CONCAT(c.synonym_name, :"SYS_B_24" ||
b.object_name), min(b.position), max(b.overload) from
sys.all_arguments b, sys.all_synonyms c where c.table_owner = b.owner
and c.table_name = b.package_name and b.package_name IS NOT NULL and
c.owner like:"SYS_B_25"escape:"SYS_B_26" and c.synonym_name
like:"SYS_B_27"escape:"SYS_B_28" group by c.owner,
CONCAT(c.synonym_name, :"SYS_B_29" || b.object_name) union all select
distinct c.owner, c.synonym_name, min(b.position), max(b.overload)
from sys.all_arguments b, sys.all_synonyms c where c.owner = b.owner
and c.table_owner=b.package_name and c.table_name=b.object_name and
c.owner like:"SYS_B_30"escape:"SYS_B_31" and c.synonym_name
like:"SYS_B_32"escape:"SYS_B_33" group by c.owner, c.synonym_name
RATIONALE: SQL statement with SQL_ID "30rku9qg2y30j" was executed 12270
times and had an average elapsed time of 0.036 seconds.
RATIONALE: Waiting for event "cursor: pin S wait on X" in wait class
"Concurrency" accounted for 7% of the database time spent in
processing the SQL statement with SQL_ID "30rku9qg2y30j".
RECOMMENDATION 2: SQL Tuning, 23% benefit (1550 seconds)
ACTION: Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SQL statement with SQL_ID
"7yv1ba0c8y86t".
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 7yv1ba0c8y86t and
PLAN_HASH 2684283631
Select WSTJ_.ROWID, WSTJ_.*, WMVD_.*
From THPR.STOJOU WSTJ_, THPR.SMVTD WMVD_ Where ((WMVD_.VCRTYP_0(+) =
WSTJ_.VCRTYP_0) AND (WMVD_.VCRNUM_0(+) = WSTJ_.VCRNUM_0) AND
(WMVD_.VCRLIN_0(+) = WSTJ_.VCRLIN_0))
And WMVD_.CCE2_0 = :1 And WSTJ_.IPTDAT_0 <= :2 And
Substr(WMVD_.ITMDES1_0,:"SYS_B_0",:"SYS_B_1") <> :3 And
Substr(WMVD_.ITMDES1_0,:"SYS_B_2",:"SYS_B_3") <> :4 And
Substr(WMVD_.ITMDES1_0,:"SYS_B_4",:"SYS_B_5") <> :5 And
((WSTJ_.TRSFAM_0 = :6) Or (WSTJ_.TRSFAM_0 = :7))
Order by WSTJ_.STOFCY_0,WSTJ_.UPDCOD_0,WSTJ_.ITMREF_0,WSTJ_.IPTDAT_0
Desc,WSTJ_.MVTSEQ_0,WSTJ_.MVTIND_0
RATIONALE: SQL statement with SQL_ID "7yv1ba0c8y86t" was executed 47
times and had an average elapsed time of 32 seconds.
RECOMMENDATION 3: SQL Tuning, 14% benefit (926 seconds)
ACTION: Use bigger fetch arrays while fetching results from the SELECT
statement with SQL_ID "7yv1ba0c8y86t".
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 7yv1ba0c8y86t and
PLAN_HASH 2684283631
Select WSTJ_.ROWID, WSTJ_.*, WMVD_.*
From THPR.STOJOU WSTJ_, THPR.SMVTD WMVD_ Where ((WMVD_.VCRTYP_0(+) =
WSTJ_.VCRTYP_0) AND (WMVD_.VCRNUM_0(+) = WSTJ_.VCRNUM_0) AND
(WMVD_.VCRLIN_0(+) = WSTJ_.VCRLIN_0))
And WMVD_.CCE2_0 = :1 And WSTJ_.IPTDAT_0 <= :2 And
Substr(WMVD_.ITMDES1_0,:"SYS_B_0",:"SYS_B_1") <> :3 And
Substr(WMVD_.ITMDES1_0,:"SYS_B_2",:"SYS_B_3") <> :4 And
Substr(WMVD_.ITMDES1_0,:"SYS_B_4",:"SYS_B_5") <> :5 And
((WSTJ_.TRSFAM_0 = :6) Or (WSTJ_.TRSFAM_0 = :7))
Order by WSTJ_.STOFCY_0,WSTJ_.UPDCOD_0,WSTJ_.ITMREF_0,WSTJ_.IPTDAT_0
Desc,WSTJ_.MVTSEQ_0,WSTJ_.MVTIND_0
FINDING 2: 37% impact (2508 seconds)
Time spent on the CPU by the instance was responsible for a substantial part
of database time.
RECOMMENDATION 1: SQL Tuning, 26% benefit (1763 seconds)
ACTION: Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "30rku9qg2y30j" for
possible performance improvements.
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 30rku9qg2y30j and
PLAN_HASH 2734400036
select a.owner, a.object_name, INSTR(a.object_type, :"SYS_B_00"),
:"SYS_B_01" from sys.all_objects a where a.object_type IN
(:"SYS_B_02",:"SYS_B_03") and a.status = :"SYS_B_04" and a.owner
like:"SYS_B_05"escape:"SYS_B_06" and a.object_name
like:"SYS_B_07"escape:"SYS_B_08" union all select c.owner,
c.synonym_name, INSTR(a.object_type, :"SYS_B_09"), :"SYS_B_10" from
sys.all_objects a, sys.all_synonyms c where c.table_owner = a.owner
and c.table_name = a.object_name and a.object_type IN
(:"SYS_B_11",:"SYS_B_12") and a.status = :"SYS_B_13" and c.owner
like:"SYS_B_14"escape:"SYS_B_15" and c.synonym_name
like:"SYS_B_16"escape:"SYS_B_17" union all select distinct b.owner,
CONCAT(b.package_name, :"SYS_B_18" || b.object_name),
min(b.position), max(b.overload) from sys.all_arguments b where
b.package_name IS NOT NULL and b.owner
like:"SYS_B_19"escape:"SYS_B_20" and b.package_name
like:"SYS_B_21"escape:"SYS_B_22" group by b.owner,
CONCAT(b.package_name, :"SYS_B_23" || b.object_name) union all select
distinct c.owner, CONCAT(c.synonym_name, :"SYS_B_24" ||
b.object_name), min(b.position), max(b.overload) from
sys.all_arguments b, sys.all_synonyms c where c.table_owner = b.owner
and c.table_name = b.package_name and b.package_name IS NOT NULL and
c.owner like:"SYS_B_25"escape:"SYS_B_26" and c.synonym_name
like:"SYS_B_27"escape:"SYS_B_28" group by c.owner,
CONCAT(c.synonym_name, :"SYS_B_29" || b.object_name) union all select
distinct c.owner, c.synonym_name, min(b.position), max(b.overload)
from sys.all_arguments b, sys.all_synonyms c where c.owner = b.owner
and c.table_owner=b.package_name and c.table_name=b.object_name and
c.owner like:"SYS_B_30"escape:"SYS_B_31" and c.synonym_name
like:"SYS_B_32"escape:"SYS_B_33" group by c.owner, c.synonym_name
RATIONALE: SQL statement with SQL_ID "30rku9qg2y30j" was executed 12270
times and had an average elapsed time of 0.036 seconds.
RATIONALE: Waiting for event "cursor: pin S wait on X" in wait class
"Concurrency" accounted for 7% of the database time spent in
processing the SQL statement with SQL_ID "30rku9qg2y30j".
RATIONALE: Average CPU used per execution was 0.036 seconds.
RECOMMENDATION 2: SQL Tuning, 23% benefit (1550 seconds)
ACTION: Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SQL statement with SQL_ID
"7yv1ba0c8y86t".
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 7yv1ba0c8y86t and
PLAN_HASH 2684283631
Select WSTJ_.ROWID, WSTJ_.*, WMVD_.*
From THPR.STOJOU WSTJ_, THPR.SMVTD WMVD_ Where ((WMVD_.VCRTYP_0(+) =
WSTJ_.VCRTYP_0) AND (WMVD_.VCRNUM_0(+) = WSTJ_.VCRNUM_0) AND
(WMVD_.VCRLIN_0(+) = WSTJ_.VCRLIN_0))
And WMVD_.CCE2_0 = :1 And WSTJ_.IPTDAT_0 <= :2 And
Substr(WMVD_.ITMDES1_0,:"SYS_B_0",:"SYS_B_1") <> :3 And
Substr(WMVD_.ITMDES1_0,:"SYS_B_2",:"SYS_B_3") <> :4 And
Substr(WMVD_.ITMDES1_0,:"SYS_B_4",:"SYS_B_5") <> :5 And
((WSTJ_.TRSFAM_0 = :6) Or (WSTJ_.TRSFAM_0 = :7))
Order by WSTJ_.STOFCY_0,WSTJ_.UPDCOD_0,WSTJ_.ITMREF_0,WSTJ_.IPTDAT_0
Desc,WSTJ_.MVTSEQ_0,WSTJ_.MVTIND_0
RATIONALE: SQL statement with SQL_ID "7yv1ba0c8y86t" was executed 47
times and had an average elapsed time of 32 seconds.
RATIONALE: Average CPU used per execution was 32 seconds.
RECOMMENDATION 3: SQL Tuning, 5.8% benefit (390 seconds)
ACTION: Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SQL statement with SQL_ID
"cbtd2nt52qn1c".
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID cbtd2nt52qn1c and
PLAN_HASH 2897530229
Select DAE_.ROWID, DAE_.*, HAE_.*
From THPR.GACCENTRYD DAE_, THPR.GACCENTRY HAE_ Where ((HAE_.TYP_0(+)
= DAE_.TYP_0) AND (HAE_.NUM_0(+) = DAE_.NUM_0))
And HAE_.CPY_0 = :1 And HAE_.ACCDAT_0 >= :2 And HAE_.ACCDAT_0 <= :3
And DAE_.ACC_0 = :4 And HAE_.FCY_0 >= :5 And HAE_.FCY_0 <= :6
Order by DAE_.BPR_0,DAE_.CUR_0,DAE_.ACC_0
RATIONALE: SQL statement with SQL_ID "cbtd2nt52qn1c" was executed 12980
times and had an average elapsed time of 0.03 seconds.
RATIONALE: Average CPU used per execution was 0.029 seconds.
RECOMMENDATION 4: SQL Tuning, 2.1% benefit (138 seconds)
ACTION: Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SQL statement with SQL_ID
"33t7fszkr29gy".
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 33t7fszkr29gy and
PLAN_HASH 2684283631
Select WSTJ_.ROWID, WSTJ_.*, WMVD_.*
From THPR.STOJOU WSTJ_, THPR.SMVTD WMVD_ Where ((WMVD_.VCRTYP_0(+) =
WSTJ_.VCRTYP_0) AND (WMVD_.VCRNUM_0(+) = WSTJ_.VCRNUM_0) AND
(WMVD_.VCRLIN_0(+) = WSTJ_.VCRLIN_0))
And WMVD_.CCE2_0 = :1 And WSTJ_.IPTDAT_0 <= :2 And
Substr(WMVD_.ITMDES1_0,:"SYS_B_0",:"SYS_B_1") <> :3 And
Substr(WMVD_.ITMDES1_0,:"SYS_B_2",:"SYS_B_3") <> :4 And
Substr(WMVD_.ITMDES1_0,:"SYS_B_4",:"SYS_B_5") <> :5 And
(((WSTJ_.TRSFAM_0 = :6) Or (WSTJ_.TRSFAM_0 = :7)))
Order by WSTJ_.STOFCY_0,WSTJ_.UPDCOD_0,WSTJ_.ITMREF_0,WSTJ_.IPTDAT_0
Desc,WSTJ_.MVTSEQ_0,WSTJ_.MVTIND_0
RATIONALE: SQL statement with SQL_ID "33t7fszkr29gy" was executed 1
times and had an average elapsed time of 136 seconds.
RATIONALE: Average CPU used per execution was 138 seconds.
FINDING 3: 15% impact (1008 seconds)
SQL statements with the same text were not shared because of cursor
environment mismatch. This resulted in additional hard parses which were
consuming significant database time.
RECOMMENDATION 1: Application Analysis, 15% benefit (1008 seconds)
ACTION: Look for top reason for cursor environment mismatch in
V$SQL_SHARED_CURSOR.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Common causes of environment mismatch are session NLS settings, SQL
trace settings and optimizer parameters.
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: Hard parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant
database time. (20% impact [1336 seconds])
SYMPTOM: Contention for latches related to the shared pool was
consuming significant database time. (2% impact [135
seconds])
INFO: Waits for "cursor: pin S wait on X" amounted to 1% of
database time.
SYMPTOM: Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant
database time. (2.3% impact [154 seconds])
FINDING 4: 8.5% impact (570 seconds)
Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
NO RECOMMENDATIONS AVAILABLE
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Waits for I/O to temporary tablespaces were not consuming significant
database time.
The throughput of the I/O subsystem was not significantly lower than
expected.
FINDING 5: 5.3% impact (355 seconds)
The SGA was inadequately sized, causing additional I/O or hard parses.
RECOMMENDATION 1: DB Configuration, 3.2% benefit (215 seconds)
ACTION: Increase the size of the SGA by setting the parameter
"sga_target" to 1740 M.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
The value of parameter "sga_target" was "1392 M" during the analysis
period.
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: Hard parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant
database time. (20% impact [1336 seconds])
SYMPTOM: Contention for latches related to the shared pool was
consuming significant database time. (2% impact [135
seconds])
INFO: Waits for "cursor: pin S wait on X" amounted to 1% of
database time.
SYMPTOM: Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant
database time. (2.3% impact [154 seconds])
SYMPTOM: Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
(8.5% impact [570 seconds])
INFO: Waits for I/O to temporary tablespaces were not consuming
significant database time.
The throughput of the I/O subsystem was not significantly lower
than expected.
FINDING 6: 4.2% impact (281 seconds)
Cursors were getting invalidated due to DDL operations. This resulted in
additional hard parses which were consuming significant database time.
RECOMMENDATION 1: Application Analysis, 4.2% benefit (281 seconds)
ACTION: Investigate appropriateness of DDL operations.
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: Hard parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant
database time. (20% impact [1336 seconds])
SYMPTOM: Contention for latches related to the shared pool was
consuming significant database time. (2% impact [135
seconds])
INFO: Waits for "cursor: pin S wait on X" amounted to 1% of
database time.
SYMPTOM: Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant
database time. (2.3% impact [154 seconds])
FINDING 7: 4% impact (266 seconds)
Waits on event "log file sync" while performing COMMIT and ROLLBACK operations
were consuming significant database time.
RECOMMENDATION 1: Host Configuration, 4% benefit (266 seconds)
ACTION: Investigate the possibility of improving the performance of I/O
to the online redo log files.
RATIONALE: The average size of writes to the online redo log files was
26 K and the average time per write was 2 milliseconds.
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: Wait class "Commit" was consuming significant database time.
(4% impact [266 seconds])
FINDING 8: 2.9% impact (192 seconds)
Soft parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant database time.
RECOMMENDATION 1: Application Analysis, 2.9% benefit (192 seconds)
ACTION: Investigate application logic to keep open the frequently used
cursors. Note that cursors are closed by both cursor close calls and
session disconnects.
RECOMMENDATION 2: DB Configuration, 2.9% benefit (192 seconds)
ACTION: Consider increasing the maximum number of open cursors a session
can have by increasing the value of parameter "open_cursors".
ACTION: Consider increasing the session cursor cache size by increasing
the value of parameter "session_cached_cursors".
RATIONALE: The value of parameter "open_cursors" was "800" during the
analysis period.
RATIONALE: The value of parameter "session_cached_cursors" was "20"
during the analysis period.
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: Contention for latches related to the shared pool was consuming
significant database time. (2% impact [135 seconds])
INFO: Waits for "cursor: pin S wait on X" amounted to 1% of database
time.
SYMPTOM: Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database
time. (2.3% impact [154 seconds])
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Wait class "Application" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Configuration" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Network" was not consuming significant database time.
Session connect and disconnect calls were not consuming significant database
time.
The database's maintenance windows were active during 100% of the analysis
period.
The analysis of I/O performance is based on the default assumption that the
average read time for one database block is 10000 micro-seconds.
An explanation of the terminology used in this report is available when you
run the report with the 'ALL' level of detail.

user12023161 wrote:
I have upgraded 10.2.0.3.0 to 10.2.0.5.0 and facing same issue. The database is slow in general after upgrade compared to 10.2.0.3.0.Try setting OPTIMIZER_FEATURE_ENABLE parameter to 10.2.0.3.
Refer following link:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/initparams142.htm

SAP B1 APPLICATION IS RUNNING SLOW IN SERVER AFTER UPGRADE

Hi,
The sap application is running slow in server after upgrading it from 9.0 to 9.1 it's taking 5-10 secs to open a document after clicking it and its taking more time in client system.
what are the steps to be taken so that the application will run without any delay.
Regards,
Karthik B

hi please check bellow thread ,it may help you
Client Machines Logon to SAP Server is Very Slow
update the status
regards
AKR

Old emails won't load after upgrade to Mountain Lion

old emails won't load after upgrade to Mountain Lion

See if anything in here will fix it:
1. Hold down the Command and Option keys as you click the iPhoto icon.
The Photo Library First Aid window opens:

Slow video playback after upgrading to ati 9200 card

Just upgraded my graphics card to the PCI ATI 9200 but now I have slower video playback than I had with the OEM Geforce AGP card. Does anyone know why this has happened? I thought I was gonna get better playback by upgrading
G4 Quicksilver 733 896mb ram Mac OS X (10.3.9)

Hi,
Well, you have me scratching my head, that's a real puzzle.
Try an Open Firmware re-set, do the 're-set all' procedure:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=42642
BTW, ATI (and OWC) has just released this info on their 9600 video card, meaning it's not so good for G4's:
Knowledge Base
ATI Customer Care > Product Information > Specifications, Features, Comparisons >
737-21888: Radeon 9600 PRO PC & MAC Edition list of supported system configurations
The information in this article applies to the following configurations:
Radeon® 9600 PRO PC & MAC Edition
"Quicksilver" Power Mac G4 model
"Quicksilver 2002" Power Mac G4 model
"Digital Audio" Power Mac G4 model
The Radeon 9600 Mac & PC Edition is not compatible with the "Quicksilver", "Quicksilver 2002" or the "Digital Audio" PowerMac G4. If a Radeon 9600 Mac & PC Edition board is installed in one of these systems the result is a blank display.
For assistance in differentiating Power Mac G4 models, please refer to Apple Article 58418.
Regards,
Dave

My iphone got slow on keyboard after upgrade... Any hints ? Tia .

Hi team
my iphone got slow on keyboard after upgrade... Any hints ? Tia .

No, I have not done a restore with no backup but I'll try (when my job will let me some time to spend for myself).
Contacts, music, calendars etc. work fine (I don't have pictures on my iPhone) but everything "feels" slow and intermittent.
I'll let you know about the complete initialization.
cheers
rob

FPS drop in the game Counter strike after updating my graphics card.

Hi, i just updated my graphic card drivers and after that the fps on a game i like to play dropped to about 5. Before it was 70-100.
Its just unplayable and i cant figure out what it is, it has to do with the update.
I tried another game and it floats the same way as before.
The pc is a HP-Pavilion and the mode name is VN278AA-UUW m9860sc.
The graphics card im using is ATI radeon HD 4650.
Any idea what it may be?

Hi TIMOWN,
Welcome to the HP Support Forums!
I am sorry to hear the your FPS has dropped so low after updating your Graphics card. I will try my best to help you with this. I suspect that you had a bad update and would suggest rolling back the driver to the previous version.
The steps to rolling back a driver are in this document for Device Manager Information for Windows 8.
I hope this helps, please let me know how it goes.
Good luck and have a great day!
I worked on behalf of HP.

Slow video playback after reinstalling Geforce2 MX card

Ok, reinstalled (took out the 9200 card) my Geforce2Mx card and now everything is in super slow motion - video, scrolling, typing, opening and closing of apps, pull down menus, loading of web pages - everything. It's like being back on an old SE30 and now even that seems fast to what is happening now. What did I do wrong? Tried rebooting a few times and resetting pram with no better results.
G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9)
Posts: 536
From: Vancouver, Canada
Registered: Dec 30, 2005
Re: Slow video playback after upgrading to ati 9200 card
Posted: Apr 10, 2006 11:56 PM
in response to: G J
Press the button near the battery on your logic board, it will reset the PMU, which might help.
Gigabit Ethernet G4 upgraded 1.2Ghz, 120GB HD, 10GB HD, 1GB RAM Mac OS X (10.4.6) ibook G4 1.42Ghz, 80GB HD, 786 MB RAM, 1GB iPod Shuffle
Tried that also with no results. Also repaired permissions. What could have happened to the machine to do that?
G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9)

Installed the modified Radeon ATI 9600 Pro for G5 Edition card and I still have the same slow video playback results. However when I boot up from another internal hard drive I do not have the video problems. Everything works just fine. Both of my hard drives had no video problems before screwing around with the ATI cards and now the one still has the problems with the video playback. This one also has Classic on it and Classic also runs slow. BTW I don't know if this has anything to do with it but when I ran a search result for "ATI" no files are installed on that 2nd hard drive which is playing video and loading pages with no problems. Would trashing all those ATI files on the slow drive do anything to help? Or is this just a coincidence?

Will Upgrading My Graphics Card Speed up Export Time?

Hello:
I am new to FCPX and I shot my first movie yeasterday and loved editing in FCPX. Here s my computer specs before I ask my question
Mac Pro 2009 Quad Core 2.93 GHZ
24GB Ram
Graphic Card - NVIIDA GT120 512mb
I use this computer for my recoridng studio and it works perfectly but now when working with video there are two things I noticed while working with my first project. I shot a 1920 X 1080 60P on my HD camcorder and the moive was 32 minutes. Here are the issues
1. Im FCPX the play head in the time line sometimes seems a little choppy and the background render is pretty slow at times as well.
2. When I went to export, the movie was going to me almost 10GB, so I purchased Compressor and in FCP went under FILE, SEND TO COMPRESSOR. I choose a 720P setting and started to process the batch. It took almost 8 hours to compress that footage which brought the file down to 1.5GB which was really great and the quality looks stunning, so I am happy aobut that.
In doing some reseach, I found that upgrading my stock graphics card may be the solution to some of the speed issues in FCPX. I nver gave that a tohught as I am new to the video editing world. I was looking at a
Sapphire HD 7950 3GB MAC Eddition
This seems like to would be a mjor upgrade to my graphic card. So my question is, by upgrading my graphic card woudl this help my issues I described aobuve? I got to image that it could not hurt for sure.
Thnaks for your time in advance.

I hope that other people more knowledgeable can comment on the matter of the graphics card.
I think that 8 hours is way too long for your hardware.
Did you turn App Nap off? If not, do it NOW for FCP X and Compressor.
Select the apps in the Finder, and hit Command I. In the Get Info window, check the box that says "Prevent App Nap".
Also, I think that you could probably do the same export in less time in FCP X itself.
FCP X has several export options. Compressor can be useful for a number of situations, especially for complex workflows, and if several macs can share the workload. I don't think Compressor makes any use of the GPU, so you would probably see no gain from the faster GPU in that export.
In most cases, a single export like yours can be done faster and easier from FCP X itself. FCP X DOES use the GPU.
As a test, I suggest that (after turning off App Nap, as described above) you try the same export from within FCP X.
File->Share->Master File
and in the Settings choose "Computer", H264 Better Quality and 1280x720.
I bet it will take substantially LESS than 8 hours (maybe close to, or a little above real time at most).

Equium A100-027: Is it possible to upgrade the graphic card?

I recently received an Equium A100-027 for my birthday. Overall I'm extremely pleased with it, however the only problem I have is with the graphics card. I am a gamer, and the graphics card just can't handle most modern games.
I am looking into how to upgrade it, how much it will cost etc. However I don't wanna buy a graphics card just to realise that the inside is locked down. Since it's only a week old I also don't want to take a hammer to it just yet ;-)
Can anyone tell me how hard it is to upgrade the graphics card? Is it locked down, or easily accessible?

Hi Emonn
Unfortunately, the graphic card upgrade is not possible. I dont know if you are familiar with the notebook technology but you should know that the graphic cards installed on the notebook motherboards are not same like the GPUs for desktop PCs.
The card a fixed and there is no way for an upgrade!!!
You can upgrade the memory modules or the HDD on the notebooks but not the graphic card!!!
Im also an gamer and Im a notebook owner but I dont use this unit for gaming but for usual usage like internet, programming, mps, etc
I have a second gaming machine and its a desktop PC. Its support a water cooling module and a really great graphic card but I will change it to the newest one NVIDIA which supports the directX10.
This is a future and all newest games will need this DrectX10!!!

I sit possible to upgrade the graphics card in my Macbook Pro?

I own a macbook pro 2.4 ghz intel core duo, 4gb ram with NVIDIA GeForce 320M 256 MB graphics card. I'm finding this graphics card pretty shocking when it comes to even the simplest of 3D games...i know probably my fault for choosing a laptop not suitable for gaming but still i did expect it to be able to handle graphics like on football manager.
Anyway my question is, is there any way to upgrade my graphics card and how much would it cost?
Any help would be greatly appreciated

I wouldn't expect Skype or iWork to be a problem. I don't know Spotify.
Have you used Disk Utility to correct permissions? This is a routine maintenance procedure that can improve some things. If you are not familiar with using this utility it's sufficient to see at the end 'permissions repair complete' or similar. There are likely to be some messages saying certain things couldn't be corrected but usually these are not serious issues.
The other thing to watch is whether you are running on battery power or mains. When there is intensive processor activity & some other internal activities too the computer might need mains power to perform at its best. You can try various things on battery alone then on battery & mains together and compare performance.
Neville

I want to upgrade my graphics card.

I have issues with playing the newest games. I must use the lowest graphics settings. I want to upgrade my graphics card. I have a AMD 5450 PCI 2.0 now in a HPE-560z machine. I want to be able to play games on ultra settings if I can. What card do I buy that will run on my computer. I'm looking for more power, better graphics more memory and so on. But I have no idea what to buy that will just plug and play on what I got now.

Here is what "reading between the lines" sounds like is happening, but it is always better to spell things out...
1st gen?
ATI?
GT120?
Then can I surmise that you have the ATI X1900?
Have you been checking for dust and cleaning it regularly?
I don't know about Softimage, and ATI vs Nvidia drivers.
If you look you will see that the GT120 is not supported. There is still the Nvidia 8800GT (there is one model for yours, and another for the 2008/2009 Mac Pro).
Your most powerful card, if you look at the benchmark tests at Barefeats and OWC/MacSales is the ATI Radeon 4870.

I want to upgrade my graphics card, what's the restrictions?

Hello. My MacBook description is 13" Late 2011. I want to upgrade the graphics card. It's currently Intel HD 3000. I want to play games like Guild Wars and Sims City once my finals are over. So probably nVidia something?
However, is there a restriction? Can the MacBook support it?
Also what is the price we're talking about. I called a repair centre a few minutes ago, and they said 1300 SGD! A little obscene! Is it really that price range?

only practical way for you:
http://www.sonnettech.com/product/echoexpresschassis.html
plus some gaming card from ATI preferrably
but gaming PC will be just better for less

Games slow to load after upgrade of graphics card.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for