GBIC-invalid error detected putting in err-disable state
I have a 3750x in which we installed a C3KX-SM-10G module if I look at the show switch service-modules it is showing connected. However as soon as I install the GLC-T transceiver in the gi1/1/2 in the module I get the following error "gbic-invalid error detected on Gi1/1/2, putting Gi1/1/2 in err-disable state" and when I look at the status for the interface it shows "err-disabled"
Any Ideas?
hi,
as i know generally 10G modules and 1G modules are not compatible. you can check compatibility matrix
Similar Messages
-
Vlan Putting in err-disable state.
How to troubleshoot this log:
%PM-4-ERR_DISABLE_VP: elmi evc down error detected on Fa0/24, vlan 101. Putting in err-disable state.
Thank you very much.
upe11#sho ethern cfm dom
Domain Name: provider_domain
Level: 4
Total Services: 2
Services:
Type Id Dir CC CC-int Static-rmep Crosscheck MaxMEP MA-Name
Vlan 101 Up Y 1s Disabled Disabled 100 customer_101_provider
Vlan 110 Up Y 1s Disabled Disabled 100 customer_110_provider
ce11#sho int f0/1
FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
ce21#sho int f0/1
FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up (connected) (vlan-err-dis)
pe1#
interface Vlan101
mtu1526
no ip address
xconnect 10.0.0.3 101 encapsulation mpls
interface GigabitEthernet9/3.110
mtu1526
no ip address
xconnect 10.0.0.3 110 encapsulation mpls
pe2#
interface Vlan101
mtu1526
no ip address
xconnect 10.0.0.2 101 encapsulation mpls
interface GigabitEthernet9/3.110
mtu1526
no ip address
xconnect 10.0.0.2 110 encapsulation mpls
upe11#
ethernet cfm ieee
ethernet cfm global
ethernet cfm traceroute cache
ethernet cfm domain provider_domain level 4
service customer_101_provider vlan 101
continuity-check
continuity-check interval 1s
service customer_110_provider vlan 110
continuity-check
continuity-check interval 1s
ethernet evc evc_p2p_101
oam protocol cfm svlan 101 domain provider_domain
ethernet evc evc_p2p_110
oam protocol cfm svlan 110 domain provider_domain
ethernet lmi global
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description ce1
switchport trunk allowed vlan 101,110
switchport mode trunk
load-interval 30
media-type rj45
ethernet cfm mep domain provider_domain mpid 1101 vlan 101
ethernet cfm mep domain provider_domain mpid 1110 vlan 110
ethernet uni id ce11
ethernet oam
service instance 101 ethernet evc_p2p_101
ethernet lmi ce-vlan map 101
service instance 110 ethernet evc_p2p_110
ethernet lmi ce-vlan map 110
interface GigabitEthernet0/15
description pe1
port-type nni
switchport mode trunk
load-interval 30
ethernet cfm mip level 4 vlan 1-4094
upe21#
ethernet cfm ieee
ethernet cfm global
ethernet cfm traceroute cache
ethernet cfm domain provider_domain level 4
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description upe22
port-type nni
switchport mode trunk
load-interval 30
media-type sfp
ethernet cfm mip level 4 vlan 1-4094
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description pe2
port-type nni
switchport mode trunk
load-interval 30
media-type sfp
ethernet cfm mip level 4 vlan 1-4094
upe22#
ethernet cfm ieee
ethernet cfm global
ethernet cfm traceroute cache
ethernet cfm domain provider_domain level 4
service customer_101_provider vlan 101
continuity-check
continuity-check interval 1s
service customer_110_provider vlan 110
continuity-check
continuity-check interval 1s
ethernet evc evc_p2p_101
oam protocol cfm svlan 101 domain provider_domain
ethernet evc evc_p2p_110
oam protocol cfm svlan 110 domain provider_domain
ethernet lmi global
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description ce21
switchport trunk allowed vlan 101,110
switchport mode trunk
load-interval 30
ethernet cfm mep domain provider_domain mpid 2110 vlan 110
ethernet cfm mep domain provider_domain mpid 2101 vlan 101
ethernet uni id ce21
ethernet oam
service instance 101 ethernet evc_p2p_101
ethernet lmi ce-vlan map 101
service instance 110 ethernet evc_p2p_110
ethernet lmi ce-vlan map 110
interface GigabitEthernet0/15
description upe21
port-type nni
switchport mode trunk
load-interval 30
media-type sfp
ethernet cfm mip level 4 vlan 1-4094
ce11#
ethernet lmi ce
interface FastEthernet0/24
description upe11
switchport trunk allowed vlan 101,110
switchport mode trunk
ethernet lmi interface
ethernet oam remote-loopback supported
ethernet oam
interface Vlan101
ip address 101.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan110
ip address 110.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
ce21#
ethernet lmi ce
interface FastEthernet0/1
description upe22
switchport trunk allowed vlan 101,110
switchport mode trunk
ethernet lmi interface
ethernet oam remote-loopback supported
ethernet oam
interface Vlan101
ip address 101.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan110
ip address 110.1.1.2 255.255.255.0Sorry, This problem is solved. I forgot create vlan database in upe.
-
there is any reasons for switch port sfp module going to err-disable state
1 has bad crc
%PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: gbic-invalid error detected on Gi0/1, putting Gi0/1 in err-disable state
%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
%PM-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from gbic-invalid err-disable state on Gi0/1
%GBIC_SECURITY_CRYPT-4-VN_DATA_CRC_ERROR: GBIC in port Gi0/1 has bad crc
%PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: gbic-invalid error detected on Gi0/1, putting Gi0/1 in err-disable state
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Vlan10, changed state to down
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to down
%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to down
%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to up
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to up
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Vlan10, changed state to up
%PM-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from gbic-invalid err-disable state on Gi0/1
%LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to administratively down
%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
%LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to administratively down
%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Vlan10, changed state to down
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to down
%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to down
%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to up
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to up
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Vlan10, changed state to up
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Vlan10, changed state to down
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to up
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to up
INEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to up
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to up -
%PM-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from arp-inspection err-disable state on Gi2/0/40
Hi All,
I am getting below error in the Switch, Please help how to troubleshoot and stop.
Mar 11 09:46:07.492 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: arp-inspection error detected on Gi2/0/37, putting Gi2/0/37 in err-disable state (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 09:49:07.516 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from arp-inspection err-disable state on Gi2/0/37 (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 10:02:55.308 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: arp-inspection error detected on Gi2/0/37, putting Gi2/0/37 in err-disable state (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 10:05:55.325 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from arp-inspection err-disable state on Gi2/0/37 (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 10:11:39.306 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: arp-inspection error detected on Gi2/0/37, putting Gi2/0/37 in err-disable state (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 10:14:39.323 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from arp-inspection err-disable state on Gi2/0/37 (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 10:50:13.152 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: arp-inspection error detected on Gi2/0/37, putting Gi2/0/37 in err-disable state (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 10:53:13.162 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from arp-inspection err-disable state on Gi2/0/37 (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 14:53:30.262 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: arp-inspection error detected on Gi2/0/40, putting Gi2/0/40 in err-disable state (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 14:56:30.279 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from arp-inspection err-disable state on Gi2/0/40 (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 15:33:03.207 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: arp-inspection error detected on Gi2/0/40, putting Gi2/0/40 in err-disable state (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 15:36:03.227 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from arp-inspection err-disable state on Gi2/0/40 (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 15:46:03.250 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: arp-inspection error detected on Gi2/0/40, putting Gi2/0/40 in err-disable state (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 15:49:03.268 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from arp-inspection err-disable state on Gi2/0/40 (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 15:53:23.050 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: arp-inspection error detected on Gi2/0/40, putting Gi2/0/40 in err-disable state (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 15:56:23.064 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from arp-inspection err-disable state on Gi2/0/40 (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 11 17:09:43.703 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: arp-inspection error detected on Gi2/0/40, putting Gi2/0/40 in err-disable state (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Mar 12 09:53:20.747 GMT: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: arp-inspection error detected on Gi2/0/40, putting Gi2/0/40 in err-disable state (C29NEWM434-03-2)
Thanks in advance,
Nagasheshu.sh errdisable recovery
ErrDisable Reason Timer Status
arp-inspection Enabled
bpduguard Enabled
channel-misconfig (STP) Disabled
dhcp-rate-limit Disabled
dtp-flap Disabled
gbic-invalid Disabled
inline-power Disabled
link-flap Enabled
mac-limit Disabled
loopback Disabled
pagp-flap Disabled
port-mode-failure Disabled
pppoe-ia-rate-limit Disabled
psecure-violation Disabled
security-violation Disabled
sfp-config-mismatch Disabled
small-frame Disabled
storm-control Disabled
udld Disabled
vmps Disabled
psp Disabled
Timer interval: 180 seconds
Interfaces that will be enabled at the next timeout:
sh ip arp inspection int output
Gi2/0/37 Untrusted 15 1
Interface Trust State Rate (pps) Burst Interval
Gi2/0/38 Untrusted 15 1
Gi2/0/39 Untrusted 15 1
Gi2/0/40 Untrusted 15 1
Gi2/0/41 Untrusted 15 1
Gi2/0/42 Untrusted 15 1
Gi2/0/43 Untrusted 15 1
Gi2/0/44 Untrusted 15 1
Gi2/0/45 Untrusted 15 1
Gi2/0/46 Untrusted 15 1
Gi2/0/47 Untrusted 15 1
Gi2/0/48 Trusted None N/A
Gi2/0/49 Untrusted 15 1
sh cdp neighbors Gig 2/0/40 det
Device ID: SEP0004f2440d98
Entry address(es):
IP address: 10.210.86.86
Platform: Polycom SoundPoint IP 450, Capabilities: Host Phone
Interface: GigabitEthernet2/0/40, Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1
Holdtime : 120 sec
Version :
Updater: 5.0.2, App: 4.0.2
advertisement version: 2
Duplex: full
Power drawn: 5.400 Watts
Power Available TLV:
Power request id: 0, Power management id: 0, Power available: 0, Power management level: 0
Management address(es):
29NEWM434-03#sh run | i arp inspe
ip arp inspection vlan 11-13,21-23
Please see the output and config. Please advise.
Thanks!! -
Getting error after putting variable in select statement
Hi All,
Kindly help me with Pl/sql code
here i'm trying to put variable in select statement ....
I successfully put the Yr and Mnth ..but getting error for loop variable "i"
Here i'm getting error that too because of " i" only-->TRIM(UPPER(TO_CHAR(TO_DATE(i||'-'||Mnth||'-'||Yr,'dd-Mon-YYYY'),'DAY')))
Please find the full code below.
Declare
Yr number not null:=2010;
Mnth varchar2(20) not null:='Jun';
v_val number:=0;
begin
for i in 1..2 loop
case i
SELECT count(*) into v_val
FROM DUAL
WHERE TRIM(UPPER(TO_CHAR(TO_DATE(i||'-'||Mnth||'-'||Yr,'dd-Mon-YYYY'),'DAY')))
in (UPPER('Monday'),UPPER('Tuesday'),UPPER('WEDNESDAY'),UPPER('THURSDAY'),UPPER('friday'))
end case;
end loop;
end;Declare
Yr number not null:=2010;
Mnth varchar2(20) not null:='Jun';
v_val number:=0;
begin
for i in 1..2 loop
SELECT count(*) into v_val
FROM DUAL
WHERE TRIM(UPPER(TO_CHAR(TO_DATE(i||'-'||Mnth||'-'||Yr,'dd-Mon-YYYY'),'DAY')))
in (UPPER('Monday'),UPPER('Tuesday'),UPPER('WEDNESDAY'),UPPER('THURSDAY'),UPPER('friday'));
end loop;
end; -
Interfaces in port-channel keep err-disabling because of keepalives
Below is the current portchannel that I am having problems with. The interfaces on Switch A keep going into an error disabled state because they receive their own loopback. Cisco says to disable keepalives and that it will fix the problem, but I do not like the idea of disabling keepalives. Has anyone found a solution other than disabling keepalives? Notice that ios's are different, but am not convinced that this is the issue. Also one is PoE and the other isn't. Lastly, i found this article "Keepalives are sent on all interfaces by default in Cisco IOS Software Release 12.1EA-based software. In Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2SE-based software and later, keepalives are not sent by default on fiber and uplink interfaces". I would think trunked interfaces in a port-channel would be uplink interfaces and if this is true, it should be sending out keepalives anyway since i am running the 12.2SE based ios. Thanks for whatever input you may have.
Switch A
C3750E Boot Loader (C3750X-HBOOT-M) Version 12.2(53r)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
System image file is "flash:/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE3/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE3.bin"
cisco WS-C3750X-48P
Port-channels in the group:
Port-channel: Po52
Age of the Port-channel = 219d:04h:32m:49s
Logical slot/port = 10/39 Number of ports = 4
GC = 0x00000000 HotStandBy port = null
Port state = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
Protocol = -
Port security = Disabled
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index Load Port EC state No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
0 00 Gi1/0/35 On 0
0 00 Gi1/0/36 On 0
0 00 Gi2/0/45 On 0
0 00 Gi2/0/46 On 0
%ETHCNTR-3-LOOP_BACK_DETECTED: Loop-back detected on GigabitEthernet1/0/35.
%PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: loopback error detected on Gi1/0/35, putting Gi1/0/35 in err-disable state
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/35, changed state to down
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Port-channel39, changed state to down
%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Port-channel39, changed state to down
Switch B
C3750E Boot Loader (C3750X-HBOOT-M) Version 12.2(53r)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
System image file is "flash:/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-58.SE2/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-58.SE2.bin"
cisco WS-C3750X-48
Port-channels in the group:
Port-channel: Po52
Age of the Port-channel = 443d:18h:43m:06s
Logical slot/port = 10/39 Number of ports = 4
GC = 0x00000000 HotStandBy port = null
Port state = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
Protocol = -
Port security = Disabled
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index Load Port EC state No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
0 00 Gi1/0/35 On 0
0 00 Gi1/0/36 On 0
0 00 Gi1/0/45 On 0
0 00 Gi1/0/46 On 0PER CISCO
Symptom:
An interface on a Catalyst switch is errordisabled after detecting a loopback.
Mar 7 03:20:40: %ETHCNTR-3-LOOP_BACK_DETECTED: Loop-back detected on
GigabitEthernet0/2. The port is forced to linkdown.
Mar 7 03:20:42: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state
to administratively down
Mar 7 03:20:43: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to down
Conditions:
This might be seen on a Catalyst 2940, 2950, 2950-LRE, 2955, 2970, 3550, 3560
or 3750 switch running 12.1EA or 12.2SE based code.
Workaround:
Disable keepalives by using the no keepalive interface command. This
will prevent the port from being errdisabled, but it does not resolve the root
cause of the problem. Please see section below for more information.
Additional Information:
The problem occurs because the keepalive packet is looped back to the port that
sent the keepalive. There is a loop in the network. Although disabling the
keepalive will prevent the interface from being errdisabled, it will not remove
the loop.
The problem is aggravated if there are a large number of Topology Change
Notifications on the network. When a switch receives a BPDU with the Topology
Change bit set, the switch will fast age the MAC Address table. When this
happens, the number of flooded packets increases because the MAC Address table
is empty. -
%PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: loopback error detected on Gi0/2
Dear Sir,
I have config. new cisco 2960 se Swtich on our LAN that is connected with another cisco switch with trunk with crass cable.
backbone link is down frequtly since i have installed it on network follwing Eror has shown in log
May 20 15:03:17.223 India: %ETHCNTR-3-LOOP_BACK_DETECTED: Loop-back detected on
GigabitEthernet0/2.
May 20 15:03:17.223 India: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: loopback error detected on Gi0/2,
putting Gi0/2 in err-disable state
May 20 15:03:18.229 India: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Gigab
itEthernet0/2, changed state to down
Can any body tell me whts prob.
and one more prob..
follwing cmd is automatically configured on new switch
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-1076337536
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-1076337536
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-1076337536
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-1076337536
certificate self-signed 01
3082023F 308201A8 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 04050030
31312F30 2D060355 04031326 494F532D 53656C66 2D536967 6E65642D 43657274
69666963 6174652D 31303736 33333735 3336301E 170D3933 30333031 30303030
35305A17 0D323030 31303130 30303030 305A3031 312F302D 06035504 03132649
4F532D53 656C662D 5369676E 65642D43 65727469 66696361 74652D31 30373633
33373533 3630819F 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 01050003 818D0030 81890281
8100AEE1 20B64C5B 4F831F44 AE90A8B7 5C60D1B1 4662B4B3 36865A3E 43F974F1
9DA7521E 692A4F13 4F447483 868A0448 322006CA AA404B31 5ED05776 76BCC3A0
0C15BF47 2176F5AC EAFB06E4 D8F49BB1 0A999AAE F3922648 63447BEC D31E1359
4F8565C6 1CF5A066 7F9D43F3 F8E5FA3B 380AF1CB F5E630D5 53A921E2 E62A3560
176B0203 010001A3 67306530 0F060355 1D130101 FF040530 030101FF 30120603
551D1104 0B300982 07535732 5F47462E 301F0603 551D2304 18301680 145041F9
C03F664F A1090118 0837DC12 90761ED4 F6301D06 03551D0E 04160414 5041F9C0
3F664FA1 09011808 37DC1290 761ED4F6 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 04050003
81810018 76970781 17981390 979FBA1E 9CA904AF 5050BAF1 5F2EE233 FACF7C69
F57CE8F2 B1EF224F 126A3EB9 5A797456 00C11FA8 86E43C25 D74C0EB2 AF8A5EE7
D45F14E7 C75FCA25 14250CFB A28507A1 66617E60 761A4F68 F1E9DD15 29B3D6FE
32AC4BBE 887687CE 890D67F5 2BE050F8 CAAC237A 50177347 DB3E2C16 65FD0AEE 66490A
quit
wht is this?????????????? and how do i remove it......
Thanks in adv...
TomHi Tom
Following is taken from a Cisco document and you might find this useful.
A loopback error occurs when the keepalive packet is looped back to the port that sent the keepalive.
The switch sends keepalives out all the interfaces by default. A device can loop the packets back to the source interface, which usually occurs because there is a logical loop in the network that the spanning tree has not blocked. The source interface receives the keepalive packet that it sent out, and the switch disables the interface (errdisable). This message occurs because the keepalive packet is looped back to the port that sent the keepalive:
%PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: loopback error detected on Gi4/1, putting Gi4/1 in
err-disable state
Keepalives are sent on all interfaces by default in Cisco IOS Software Release 12.1EA-based software.
In Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2SE-based software and later, keepalives are not sent by default on fiber and uplink interfaces.
The suggested workaround is to disable keepalives and upgrade to Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2SE or later.
Reference : http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk621/technologies_tech_note09186a00806cd87b.shtml
Hope this helps
Happy Networking!!!!
Regards
Narendrakumar B -
%PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: loopback error detected
ETHCNTR-3-LOOP_BACK_DETECTED: Keepalive packet loop-back detected on FastEthernet0/23.
%PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: loopback error detected on Fa0/23, putting Fa0/23 in err-disable state
Information:
1. swith 3550(f0/23,trunk,up-SW) link to 3550(f0/23,trunk,down-sw)
2. disable port is not used.
3. port used(connect to cisco router,cisco switch,IPS,log server,ibm router,sniffer)
4. IOS (C3550-I9Q3L2-M), Version 12.1(14)EA1a
How to check where 's loopback port problem?Hi Friend,
Also if changing the cable did not resolve the issue then there may be a STP loop in you network.
The problem occurs because the keepalive packet is looped back to the port that sent the keepalive. Keepalives are sent on the Catalyst switches in order to prevent loops in the network. Keepalives are enabled by default on all interfaces. You see this problem on the device that detects and breaks the loop, but not on the device that causes the loop.
Workaround will be to issue the "no keepalive" interface command in order to disable keepalives. A disablement of the keepalive prevents errdisablement of the interface, but it does not remove the loop.
To remove the loop you may have to trace the cables and switches and find out that out.
Regards,
Ankur -
Packet-buffer err-disable .. i don't understand.
Error for WS-X6516-GE-TX
03:23: %PM_SCP-SP-2-LCP_FW_ERR_INFORM: Module 6 is experiencing the following error: Transient port ASIC (PINNACLE) packet buffer parity error detected on ports 1, 2, 3, 4,
00:03:23: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Gi6/1, putting Gi6/1 in err-disable state
00:03:23: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Gi6/2, putting Gi6/2 in err-disable state
00:03:23: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Gi6/3, putting Gi6/3 in err-disable state
00:03:23: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Gi6/4, putting Gi6/4 in err-disable state
thanks for you. it's help to me.It could be cause of following:
A cable that is out of specification (either too long, the wrong type, or defective)
A bad network interface card (NIC) card (with physical problems or driver problems)
A port duplex misconfiguration
To eliminate the problem.. follow below document check one by one.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk621/technologies_tech_note09186a00806cd87b.shtml
Regards,
Dharmesh Purohit -
WAPs connected ports are becoming err-disabled.
Hi All,
I'm facing a strange issue. WAPs connected ports are becomming err-disabled with an attached error message. Not only a single WAP, All the WAPs connected to the 3750 are having the same issue. I have tried to identify which WAP is sending the BPDU and that inturn causing other WAP connected ports to be down.
I have 5 WAPs in that site; if I enable any WAPs connected port below logs messages are coming and that port is becomming err-disable.
Can anyone shed some light to troubleshoot this issue. Any help would be appreciated.
Dec 1 03:32:59.397 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_BPDUGUARD: Received BPDU on port Gi1/0/12 with BPDU Guard enabled. Disabling port.
Dec 1 03:32:59.397 UTC: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: bpduguard error detected on Gi1/0/12, putting Gi1/0/12 in err-disable state
Dec 1 03:33:00.420 UTC: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/12, changed state to down
Dec 1 03:33:00.420 UTC: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Vlan5, changed state to down
Dec 1 03:33:00.420 UTC: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Vlan50, changed state to down
Dec 1 03:33:00.420 UTC: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Vlan51, changed state to down
Dec 1 03:33:01.427 UTC: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/12, changed state to down
Regards,
T.KCan you please furnish the command output of the following:
1. sh version
2. sh run int g 1/0/12
3. sh interface status err -
Cisco 4506 switch in Err-disable mode
I have a Cisco 4506 switch and its 10 gig interface is in error disable mode.I tried Shut and no shut the port couple of times but it transits from up to down number of times and then to error-disable. Did anyone else encountered this issue before. kindly advise the solution for the same. thanks
Hi Shariq,
Can you post the output of the show interface status err-disable ? That output contains the reason for putting your port into err-disabled state.
Best regards,
Peter -
LMS 4.2 - Err-disable port state
Hello,
I'm trying to figure it out how exactly LMS learns about ports in err-disable state? Which MIB or command is used?
I have two ME3400 switches with err-disabled ports but LMS shows only the ports of one of the them. Both switches are ME-3400-24TS-A
and have the same IOS version (12.2(53)SE). I'm sure data collection is running fine because it updates the other discrepancies.
What i have tried by now:
- did an SNMP walk from LMS on CISCO-ERR-DISABLED-MIB - no info found there on port status
- did an SNMP walk from LMS on CISCO-STACK-MIB - I know that this MIB contains object portAdditionalOperStatus (1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.4.1.1.23) which shows the operational status of the ports, but it seems that ME3400 does not support it (although it supports CISCO-STACK-MIB), because I cannot see the SNMP reponse in the trace:
========================================================================
The following is a SNMP walk of device 192.168.6.89 starting from .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.4.1.1.23
SNMP Walk Output
.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.4.1.1.23
CISCO-STACK-MIB::portAdditionalOperStatus = No Such Object available on this agent at this OID
========================================================================
So how does LMS knows which ports are in err-disable state?
Kind regards,
VelinHello,
The OID that LMS uses for detecting the err-disabled state of the ports is 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.548.1.3.1.1.2 (cErrDisableIfStatusCause) from CISCO-ERR-DISABLE-MIB
Velin -
N5K err-disabled a port due to DCX-No ACK in 100 PDUs
I'm super new to Nexus, so I'm not really sure how to troubleshoot this. I did a quick search and found that this is related to DCBX TLVs in LLDP, which we apparently shouldn't be getting on a regular ethernet port. I'm pretty sure this is just a regular ethernet port. (Like I said, I'm pretty new to nexus. lol) I wonder if the following output indicates that we are receiving and sending DCBX TLVs in LLDP. If so, it sounds like the interface will go into err-disable state if the server stops sending ACK frames.
# show lldp dcbx int e1/17
Local DCBXP Control information:
Operation version: 00 Max version: 00 Seq no: 1 Ack no: 1
Type/
Subtype Version En/Will/Adv Config
004/000 000 Y/N/Y 8906001b21 08
002/000 000 Y/N/Y 0000000064 00000000 00000001
Peer's DCBXP Control information:
Operation version: 00 Max version: 00 Seq no: 1 Ack no: 1
Type/ Max/Oper
Subtype Version En/Will/Err Config
004/000 000/000 Y/Y/N 8906001b21 08
003/000 000/000 Y/Y/Y ff08
002/000 000/000 Y/Y/N ffffffff00 00000000 00000008
This is the first time we've run into this. Any idea what might really be going on?
Thanks!Hi,
Per the display it the Server Adapter is doing LLDP DCBX negotiation.
If not needed, then you might want to check the Server adapter settings.
DCBX is an extension of LLDP link layer discovery protocol; not restricted for FCOE usage.
Further informatin on LLDP for Nexus:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5500/sw/layer2/602_N1_1/b_5500_Layer2_Config_602N11_chapter_01010.html#task_1152779
Thanks!
Regards,
Carlos -
Gig port down/down (err-disabled) Reason: diagnostics
Hello,
Today I had a 2 ports on Cisco 6509 go into err-disabled state. Both ports show reason "diagnostics". I tried bouncing the interfaces and defaulting the interfaces. Any ideas? Thank you!
Show int status err-disabled:
Port Name Status Reason
Gi1/4 err-disabled diagnostics
Gi1/6 In Patient First F err-disabled diagnostics
Show Version:
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) s3223_rp Software (s3223_rp-IPBASE_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXF16, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2009 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Tue 03-Mar-09 19:00 by kellythw
Image text-base: 0x40101040, data-base: 0x42A48810
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)SX3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
BOOTLDR: s3223_rp Software (s3223_rp-IPBASE_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXF16, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
NOMA17UA01A uptime is 4 years, 34 weeks, 4 days, 23 hours, 36 minutes
Time since NOMA17UA01A switched to active is 4 years, 34 weeks, 4 days, 23 hours, 48 minutes
System returned to ROM by power cycle (SP by power on)
System restarted at 11:49:53 extende Tue Sep 8 2009
System image file is "sup-bootdisk:s3223-ipbase_wan-mz.122-18.SXF16.bin"
cisco WS-C6509-E (R7000) processor (revision 1.4) with 458752K/65536K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID SMG1229N0DT
R7000 CPU at 300Mhz, Implementation 0x27, Rev 3.3, 256KB L2, 1024KB L3 Cache
Last reset from power-on
SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp).
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
Bridging software.
TN3270 Emulation software.
2 Virtual Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interfaces
345 Gigabit Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interfaces
1915K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
65536K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K).
Configuration register is 0x2102
Thank you,
-Nick ChenaultI think Diagnostics means Hardware related issue not Config related, I would contact Cisco as this could a sign of ASIC failure.
Manish -
Missing "disabled" state in skin
I have a custom component CircleProgress.mxml with two states: "default" and "other", using a skin with the same two states defined. But during compilation, there appears an error in the skin file: The required skin state "disabled" is missing.
I don't want any "disabled" state because the logic of my application does not include such state. How to get rid of this error? (without adding the "disabled" state)
Below is the code:
<s:BorderContainer xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx"
skinClass="mylib.progress.circle.skins.SolidSkin"
>
<s:states>
<s:State name="default"/>
<s:State name="other"/>
</s:states>
<fx:Script>
<![CDATA[
import mx.events.FlexEvent;
import spark.components.supportClasses.SkinnableComponent;
import spark.primitives.Ellipse;
[SkinState("default")]
[SkinState("other")]
[SkinPart(required="true")]
public var skinCircle:Ellipse;
]]>
</fx:Script>
</s:BorderContainer>
And the skin:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<s:Skin xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx">
<fx:Metadata>
[HostComponent("mylib.progress.circle.CircleProgress")]
</fx:Metadata>
<s:states>
<s:State name="default" />
<s:State name="other" />
</s:states>
<s:Ellipse id="skinCircle" width="100%" height="100%" >
<s:stroke>
<s:SolidColorStroke color="blue"/>
</s:stroke>
</s:Ellipse>
</s:Skin>I think you're right. It is even written in Adobe documentation of the BorderContainer under the Skin States section, I just didn't notice it before, Bordercontainer inherits "disabled" and "normal" skin states.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Stardard Text (changes ) move to production server
Hai all <b>i have one situation to change the content text in the standard text in so10 transaction i have done the changes while saving it wont ask for any request i need the same changes in the production server . how can i transport this standard
-
Is there a way to update the default design-time property (expiration date) of a BPEL Process human task prior to it being instantiated via an API call? How would you update multiple human tasks' expiration date for a single BPEL Process instance? Th
-
Updated Default Account Form - any way to easily get old one back?
I suspect not, but MSFT arbitrarily changed my default account view and I hate it. I had my old one set up perfectly, why they'd mess with my form settings I don't know. I suppose I have to build a new form, but just in case I can get my old one back
-
Is there any solution to send reports to a specific location in a remote machine?
-
Lenovo flex 2 14 touchpad showing im touching it
My lenovo flex 2 14 touchpad is saying tham I have 4 fingers on the touch pad (which is evidently effecting it as i cant use it what so ever), when I dont. This occured out of no where, and no software, or system changes have occured to cause this is