General Discussion - Why to choose APO over R/3 for planning?

Hi All,
Why do we choose APO over R/3 for planning? What are the inputs or other factors that make APO a better planning tool?
Are the factors which make APO a better tool not available foe R/3 planning?
Thanks in advance
Changed subject suitably.
Message was edited by:
        Somnath Manna

I do aggree what other have mentioned .Here are specific inputs on newly desined process in APO in comparisosn with R/3
1. Existing Processes in SAP R/3
<b>Forecasting</b>
Forecasting enables companies to run statistical forecasting model, aggregate and disaggregate forecasts, as well as the capability to modify forecasting numbers manually
Newly-Designed Processes
Demand Planning DP (SAP APO)
Demand Planning adds to forecasting capabilities to manage promotions, product introductions and phase outs, as well as the impact o causal factors, like weather or macro economic data.
Additional forecasting techniques are available like Linear Regression (Causal Factors), Croston Method (Slow Moving Items) and Weighted Average
Consensus based Planning enables Marketing, Sales, Logistics to share and collaborate on their forecast and create a final consensus forecast
Forecasting based on characteristics instead of SKU for configured products
2. Existing Processes in SAP R/3
<b>Sales & Operations Planning</b>
SOP allows to consolidate forecast based on supply capabilities, through reporting and interactive planning capabilities.
Newly-Designed Processes
Supply Network Planning SNP (SAP APO)
Demand and Supply Plans can be intelligently balanced leveraging cost or/and revenue based optimization techniques
Trade-off Analysis to determine product-mix, inventory build ups for seasonal demand, capacity allocations for alternative manufacturing locations etc.
Web based information sharing and collaborative interactive planning environment
KPI Reporting
3. Existing Processes in SAP R/3
<b>Distribution Requirements Planning</b>
Traditional DRP logic allows to calculate requirements for a single stage distribution network
Newly-Designed Processes
Supply Network Planning SNP (SAP APO)
Supply Network Heuristic enables to run DRP across the complete supply network generating requirements (production and purchasing) at each node.
The planner can easily navigate through the network to view and modify demands and supply‘s in their different categories
Demand Planning Units and Stock Keeping Units mapping can be done on quotations.
4. Existing Processes in SAP R/3
Not available
Newly-Designed Processes
<b>Deployment SNP (SAP APO)</b>
The ability to deploy products through the supply network based on pull or push concepts. Different heuristics like fair share logics are supported.
Transport Load Building allows to combine different products to a single load, interactive, as well as via heuristic to create full truck loads.
5. Existing Processes in SAP R/3
<b>Master Planning</b>
Master Planning allows to plan production at an aggregated level including rough cut capacity planning.
Newly-Designed Processes
Supply Network Planning SNP (SAP APO)
Supply Network Planning allows to consider distribution, production and transportation constraints concurrently.
In addition to a generic SNP Optimizer based on Linear Programming and capacity leveling algorithms, industry specific optimization is available for
Campaign Optimization
Capable to Match
6. Existing Processes in SAP R/3
<b>Material Requirements Planning</b>
MRP calculates material requirements based on BOM structures, lead times, lot sizes etc.
Capacity Planning
CRP in a second step looks at the capacity requirements
Newly-Designed Processes
Production Planning PP/DS  (SAP APO)
Production Planning allows to consider material and capacity constraints simultaneously to derive material, capacity requirements and dynamic lead times. BOMs and lot sizing will be also considered
Pegging relationships between customer order, production orders, purchase orders will be stored and enable bi-directional propagation if changes occur on the demand or supply side
7. Existing Processes in SAP R/3
<b>Transportation Planning</b>
Manual Planning of shipments, including predefined master routes.
Newly-Designed Processes
Transportation Planning TP/VS (SAP APO)
Transportation Planning enables companies to determine the right shipment mode and route based on demand and supply situation, considering transportation constraints and costs.
8. Existing Processes in SAP R/3
<b>Shop Floor Scheduling and Assembly Processing</b>
Planning Table to view in a Gant Chart the schedule.
Heuristics like forward/backward scheduling (infinite)
Manual scheduling
Newly-Designed Processes
Detailed Scheduling PP/DS  (SAP APO)
Finite and infinite scheduling, considering material, capacity, time and market constraints.
Manual scheduling
Scheduling optimization via optimization algorithms, like
Genetic Algorithm
Constraint based Propagation
Kiran Kute

Similar Messages

  • Why we choose mpls over point to point only because it is cheap

    I need a document explaining the advantages and disadvantages of converting point to point connectivity to MPLS and the plan / suggestion to overcome the disadvantages

    Hi,
    Converting a network that consists of point-to-point links to run MPLS can have benefits. This is regardless of the type of links you have in the network.
    One starting point could be this one:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiprotocol_Label_Switching
    The big benefit that comes with deploying MPLS in your network is the ability to run the MPLS applications. Here are the most important ones:
    -MPLS VPN - Layer 3 (with multicast)
    -MPLS VPN - Layer 2 - point-to-point or point-to-multipoint
    -MPLS Traffic Engineering - point-to-point or point-to-multipoint
    Each of these have their benefits, while running over a one common network : an IP network with MPLS enabled.
    The most important benefits are:
    L3 VPN : obviously gives you seperated VPNs, with the possibility of overlapping IP subnets
                  extreme easy provisioning of layer 3 VPNs
    L2 VPN: supports transporting most supported layer 2 protocols, even protocols with clocking information
    MPLS TE: steering of traffic through the network and extremely fast traffic protection
    These are just the most important ones.
    All of these applications run on one common network, while before MPLS, one needed to have multiple carrying networks (e.g. one Frame-Relay network, one ATM network, one IP network) in order to provide all the same functionality.
    Regards,
    Luc

  • Why does it take over ten minutes for email to get through for my request for a signature

    Why isn't this program faster? It's been over 20 minutes emailing a test form, to myself, to see how quick this is? Is this normal? Not what I was looking for in a software program

    Have you tried to eliminate everything extraneous. In other words, do you experience the same delays with a simple Java program (no lookups, JNDI) that loads the drivermanager and creates a connection.
    Do you have access to a traciong JVM or some program that captures run-time execution timing information? Even without the source, this will tell you the specific class::methos where time is spent so you can better determine where the delay is ocurring.

  • Actual Over Head Calculation for process order

    hi!
    I have created a costing sheet for  over head, which will be based on labour activity cost.
    the base is labour cost for which I have given secondary cost element ( assigned in activity type for labour hours) in costing sheet and maintained over head rate for planned & actual. in credit of costing sheet for over head I have given secondary cost element with internal order.
    first question is : when internal order posting will happen? I am assuming , when production order settlement is done, over head cost has to be accrued to internal order. is my assumption is correct? because in line items of internal order , i couldn't see any thing.
    second question is : in process order, system is showing over head cost under planned cost, but it is showing ZERO in actual cost column. I have executed KGI2, system is not showing any senders or receivers. but when I executed KGI2 with dialog dipslay check box, system shows the calculations as per cost sheet correctly under condition value column.
    Please let me know where I missed ? how to get actual over heads in process order.
    in process order in cost analysis in the actual/target cost layout, system is showing the over head costs. but where as in "cost trend" layout, system is not showing over head cost.
    can any one help on above points.
    regards,
    ramesh b

    Hi
    Maintain the Overhead rate in KZM2 or KZZ2 as the case may be
    Then execute CO43... The moment overhead is charged to Process order, it would post credit to IO
    br, Ajay M

  • Why did you choose creative over Ip

    I chose creative over ipod because...
    st I don't like the way their navagation weel looks.
    2nd they are made by apple... I never did like apple because they have their own operating system.
    3rd they have there own music format, (AAC aka i tunes) and i likes microsoft's wma format.
    how about you all? why did you choose creative over ipod?
    by the way, how many creative mp3 players do you own?
    me, well i own a creative zen micro that's about 5 months old, and a creative zen touch that's about a week old.

    I chose Creative Zen Micro 5g over iPod first of all because I received a 25% off discount on my original SB Audigy due to a class action lawsuit and they threw in a free pair of headphones that originally cost $39.99. So the whole package was $69.22. Pretty good deal I think. I love it so far.
    Secondly I chose it because I don't like the fact that iPod has become a household word. My player does just as good a job as the iPod or iPod mini. So when people ask me what I have on my iPod I just tell them "nothing, since I don't own an iPod." Then I promptly explain to them that every digital music player is not an iPod.
    Third because I am just not a fan of Mac or Apple and their propensity to lock people in to their hardware as well as not opening up Mac OS X to the X86 community in their new Intel deal. I am pretty sure the hacking community will take care of this one for us though.

  • Linux using boot camp is it possible why people choose VMware or parallels?

    Hi everyone,
    Has anyone installed Linux using boot camp ? I'm asking this because i want to install the latest version of oracle database 11g and i need to install Linux or Windows to run the server.
    There is no version of Oracle 11g for macosx atm.
    Why people choose VMware and Parallels instead of using boot camp?
    Please give some feedback.
    Greatfully,
    Nuno

    UrbanJenkie wrote:
    Hi everyone,
    Hi Nuno and welcome to Discussions,
    Has anyone installed Linux using boot camp ? I'm asking this because i want to install the latest version of oracle database 11g and i need to install Linux or Windows to run the server.
    Quite a lot of people are running Linux on their Intel-Macs (I am not one of them...).
    Here's a how-to for Ubuntu https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Intel_iMac
    There is no version of Oracle 11g for macosx atm.
    Time to complain(send a feedback to Oracle
    Why people choose VMware and Parallels instead of using boot camp?
    VMWare and Parallels have the advantage over BootCamp, that you can use them while still being in OSX, so that you can run Windows/Linux alongside OSX.
    With BootCamp you have to restart your Mac each time you want to switch to/from Windows/Linux.
    Please give some feedback.
    Hope it helps
    Greatfully,
    Nuno
    Regards
    Stefan

  • Choosing iMAC over Mac Mini.....

    Why would people choose iMAC over Mac mini? And why not? How much is the iMAC better than the Mac mini?
    Looking for answers ASAP. thank you.

    Well as of this writing the low end MM is $600.00 and the low end iMac is $1200.00 so we will use these as a base line, at a $600.00 difference!
    The iMac you get a 3GHZ processor, the mini 2.26GHZ.
    The iMac you get built in Speakers/microphone/camera/SD slot, the mini A built in speaker.
    The iMac you can max memory to 16GB, the mini max memory 4GB.
    The iMac comes will 500GB of HDD space, the mini 320GB.
    Now the most impressive...
    The display:
    The iMac comes with a beautiful 21.5" LED IPS display, the mini none!
    To purchase a comparable display alone will cost you at least $600.00, and it will not look as good as the iMac display.
    Add the display and all the other features that the iMac has over the mini and you just get more bang for you buck with the iMac.
    Now does that mean that it is a better deal?
    Well not if you iMacs display goes out, with a mini you just get another one.
    The great thing about the iMac is if you're new to Mac then you're definitely going to get the full Apple/Mac experience, unless of coarse you get one of these messed up iMacs they have been shipping lately.

  • Why do colors come over as Color Book swatches when I copy and paste to a new document?

    Why do colors come over as Color Book swatches when I copy and paste to a new document? Original document has CMYK spot color swatches. I copy them and paste them in new document and it gets converted to a Color Book swatch. Why?

    Check the spot color options of that document.
    It's in the swatches panel's menu.

  • Flex language questions should go in the General Discussion Forum

    This forum is intended for Flex Builder questions.
    Of course you can post wherever you like, but if you want
    help, go where the helpers are.
    Tracy

    can you define what goes where then?
    General discussion sounds like thoughts, comments, hopes and
    wishes.
    Builder 2, (meaning Flex Builder 2?), seems to be the only
    area for other Flex 2 questions.
    I don't mean to be wise here, but I personally don't
    understand what a "builder 2" question is if not those that deal
    with flex 2, such as those posted here. I want to post my questions
    where they should be so that I might find help, so maybe the forum
    labelling should be re-considered or better defined.

  • Why SSH is secured over telnet

    Why SSH is secured over telnet?
    Hi folks,
    Why telnet is not secured and why SSh is secured?
    Regards
    Thanveer
    "Everybody is genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is a stupid."       

    telnet is in the clear while ssh is not.  In other words, the information travel over the wire can be seen in clear text by the intruder without having to deciper the data.  Not so with SSH. 
    Similar argument can be made with http and http(s).

  • Why does it take over two hours to download a movie on Apply tv

    Why does it take over two hours to download a  movie on Apple TV
    Thanks

    Welcome to the Apple Community.
    The first thing to check would be your internet download speed, you can do this at www.speedtest.net.
    1080p HD movies require a recommended speed of 8 Mbps, 720p HD movies require a recommended speed of 6 Mbps, while SD movies require a recommended speed of 2.5 Mbps.
    Netflix uses adaptive streaming and can reduce quality right down to produce a stream as low as 0.5 Mbps.

  • Suggestion​: General Discussion​s\Off Topic Section

    hi,
    it would be great to have an off topic forum/section here for us to interact and have general discussions. almost every forum i'm a member of has an Off Topic section. we can get to know each other much better and share useful information and opinions about various topics, technology and others also. we can do the same through PM's, but getting everyone involved will feel much better.
    Make it easier for other people to find solutions, by marking my answer with \'Accept as Solution\' if it solves your problem.
    Click on the BLUE KUDOS button on the left to say "Thanks"
    I am an ex-HP Employee.

    if they start posting technical questions or spam here, then they should be banned!
    EDIT: in other news, my reputation level increased!
    Message Edited by DexterM on 01-07-2009 11:44 PM
    Make it easier for other people to find solutions, by marking my answer with \'Accept as Solution\' if it solves your problem.
    Click on the BLUE KUDOS button on the left to say "Thanks"
    I am an ex-HP Employee.

  • Why use mail client over web site mail inteface?

    Hello.
    I had question to all emial client user's:
    Why use mail client over web site mail inteface?
    And I have one more question.
    Is there any option to backup/compress your mail in mutt or thunderbird?

    brisbin33 wrote:
    briest wrote:
    brisbin33 wrote:Also, imap in mutt for me is sooooo slow (proportional to the size of the mailbox of course)
    Do you use header caching? It can accelerate remote imap access, but is disabled by default. Also playing with imap_idle (yes, if server supports), imap_keepalive (low) and timeout (high) may produce nice results.
    i've tried everything (always caching, and setting various imap_* options).  trust me.  it's funny, it wasn't bad at first, then one day i'd hit j/k and 3 seconds later the indicator would move... that's when i set up offlineimap.
    I'm very happy with this maildir setup now .  thanks anyway tho.
    OMG, mutt is flying right now! Even with header and message cache is mutt + imap not the fastest. I reccomend offlineimap for everyone.

  • Would you choose neoOffice over openOffice?

    Hello all,
    I'm very new to Apple. I've purchase my first iMac last September and this is my first post.
    I'm interested in installing either of these products. Office 2011 for Mac is out of the question as I don't do enough work at home to warrant purchasing it.
    The last post I've read regarding the same question was circa 2006.
    Anyways what are the pros & cons between the two? At the moment I'm inclined to install openOffice.
    Your thoughts and guidance are appreciated.

    Neooffice, when it first came out, was a vast improvement of the user interface over Openoffice, which had not been fully ported over to OSX at that time.  The current version of Openoffice is fully ported to OSX so that is no longer an issue.  Others may have other thoughts about Neooffice, but that was the reason I first started using it.
    There is another fork of Openoffice called Libreoffice.  This version was created after a falling out by some of the programers of Openoffice from Oracle when Oracle took over Sun.  I went from Neooffice, to Openoffice to Libreoffice.  Other than the user interface issue above (which is no longer an issue anyway,) I don't see any significant reason to choose one over the other, as far as features go.  However, my needs for an Office suite are quite simple so YMMV of course.
    BTW, I use Office 2011 because of my need for Outlook.  Most of the time, I'm using Libreoffice for word processing and spreadsheets and only open Word and Excel when I get one of those dreaded DOCX or XLSX files.  Openoffice and Libreoffice still have issues with some formatting of text and tables in DOCX.  So if you have to deal with the current MSOffice files a lot, then you might not have a choice except to buy MSOffice.

  • General Discussion - Best practice to manage Process order

    Hi Experts,
    Which is the best practice to manage process orders ?
    1. Quantity Change - I can make quantity adjustment in R3 and APO.
    2. Source Change - I can make a version change from order header . Also i can make a source change in APO by selecting a different PPM. Which is the best option.
    3. Re Read Master Data - Best practice to read master data is from R3 or APO ?
    I feel for all the above scenarios process ordes should always managed in R3. But still wondering why we have the same flexibility in APO too ?
    Can

    Hello,
    we are just migrating from 4.6c to ECC 6.0 and I have a couple of workflows to adopt.
    For background steps I defined in the corresponding BOR methods an exception to be fired when no result is available (e.g. no mail address available). Normally, I defined them as temporary errors.
    I activated in the WI outcome section the line for this exception and so the workflow processed this branch when the exception appeared. It worked fine.
    Now, in ECC 6.0, the same workflow get stuck in the WI. The exception is fired (I can see it in the log as "Error message"), but the WI is still in status "in process". It doesn't continue with the error outcome branch.
    Is this a new logic in ECC 6.0? Do you have any idea what to do? I used this logic some dozent times in different methods and workflows and it gives me a headache if I have to change everything ...
    Thank you!
    Best regards,
    Thomas

Maybe you are looking for