GetDuration() gives wrong value. bug?
I have a simple Symbol with a timeline of 10 seconds.
If i place a any trigger like sym.stop() anywhere "on the timeline" sym.getDuration() gives me 10000 what ist correct.
If i place no triggered action on the timeline sym.getDuration() gives me 170454.41228624 which is quite not correct.
Its in the same EdgeAnimate - Compositon and clearly reproducible.
Sorry, i do not understand your answer.
1) To me, stage timeline has a length of 5000 ms. But on the stage is a Symbol that itself has a timeline of 2min 50.4sec, to my understanding this should not extend the stages timeline length.
2) Nevertheless, placing a trigger ( like sym.stop() or even empty ) on the stage should not alter the value of the alert, but it does.
without a trigger i get 170454.41228624, with a trigger set on first frame i get 5000.
Similar Messages
-
CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM gives wrong values for Scess and HScess in PO Print
Dear Friends,
I am working with PO Print in smartforms hare the Fm CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM is gives wrong values for Scess and HEcess if I put the Gate pass (Basic Excise Duty) Manually.
And one more Issue is as if I check any line item condition taxes than imediatly when I see the print the all line items Scee and HEcess displays same which I have saw.
If there is a single line item in PO than there is no issue any way.
kindly suggest to resolve the issue.
Regards,
D Tarun KumarHi,
I had the same issue, that taxes on invoice tab of PO was not printed correctly on PO form by calling CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM.
If you want to have the same tax value as komp-mwsbp, that use following form routine call before FB CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM.
perform j_1b_save_tax_fields(saplmepo) using ekko ekpo lfa1.
This is used in transaction me23n also.
Kind regards,
Tülay -
Passing values from CVI dll to TestStand gives wrong values
Initially I wanted to pass an array of booleans from CVI to TestStand. I read that this was not possible because you cannot set Boolean as a parameter.
So I declared it as unsigned intin CVI.
Strangely enough, TestStand does receive it as an arrayof Booleans. However the values are still wrong. I wonder if it actually is possible to pass an array of Booleans.
Using TestStand 3.1 and CVI ver 7.1 (no impact)
Here is how I declare the parameters in CVI:
void __declspec(dllexport) __stdcall MemTest
CAObjHandle thisContext,
unsigned char * apbResult,
int alComport,
int alSocketNum,
UINT32 aulHostAddr,
BOOL * apbTestOutcome,
UINT32 testSize,
UINT32 startAddress
The other functions within CVI use an array of booleans.
Here is how I declare the parameters in TestStand:
Here are the results I get. They should match...
The obvious question is:
How do I get the results in TestStand to match those from CVI?
The printout >> no. 1 Passed << etc.. are the values of the array apbResult in CVI. bSippResuls should match.
Message Edited by Ray.R on 10-16-2009 10:41 AM
Attachments:
TS_prms.PNG 29 KB
TSwrongValues.PNG 12 KBRay,
Try this:
void __declspec(dllexport) GetResults(unsigned char arg1[16])
//Insert function body here.
arg1[0] = (unsigned char)0;
arg1[1] = (unsigned char)1;
arg1[2] = (unsigned char)0;
arg1[3] = (unsigned char)1;
arg1[4] = (unsigned char)1;
arg1[5] = (unsigned char)0;
arg1[6] = (unsigned char)1;
arg1[7] = (unsigned char)1;
arg1[8] = (unsigned char)1;
arg1[9] = (unsigned char)0;
arg1[10] = (unsigned char)1;
arg1[11] = (unsigned char)1;
arg1[12] = (unsigned char)1;
arg1[13] = (unsigned char)1;
arg1[14] = (unsigned char)0;
arg1[15] = (unsigned char)1;
Regards
Ray
Regards
Ray Farmer -
TransactionStateChanged gives wrong value when validation error.
In my navbar, wich extends the standard one I extended the transactionStateChanged method.
It seems to work and when the transaction goes dirty I receive a true state; when transaction returns clean I receive false.
However if a validation fails during commit the transaction remains dirty but I receive a false value (as if commit worked).
Testing the transaction dirty during that phase gives false.
How can I solve that issue ?
Tks
TullioRepost
-
Dear all,
I have an add-on that does something in the rows of a number of forms.
Now I have the problem that if I have just made an Invoice with 6 rows and I change to sales order the Item_event says that I have 6 rows, although my screen is empty.
How can I be sure that the number of rows the pVal.Row gives me is correct?
Can I reset everything when I change forms?
Kind regards,
John SlaatsHi
If .update method don´t work... ... perhaps you should show us some code..... maybe you are consulting that value on beforeAction -
MONTHNAME on Presentation give wrong values even the timezone settings are
HI All,
I have done the timezome settings on the BI Presentation services,all the dates work fine exactly the required date with timestamp is comming.
THe problem is if i use MONTHNAME on the Presentations it gives the original value.
Ex:if My original date is "31-MAR-2011 11:00 00 PM" after time zone setting(+2hrs) it shows "01-APR-2011 01:00 00 AM" which is exactly which we need to get and we are getting ,
but if im using MONTHNAME(above date field) it still returns MAR where it should return APR,coz we expect APR as the timezone setting has been done.
Can you please help me if i still missing any Settings in OBIEE.
Regards,
Kishore KHI,
Thanks for the reply...!
But if the timezone is handled there should be something which works on the months as well......any file setting need to be changed...?
Or any doc from Oracle handling the issue.....!
Thanks in advance....!
Regards,
Kishore -
Editable field gives wrong value in report.
Hi,
I have report with some editable fields. I am using apex_item for one editable select list. I gave functionality to update row by providing go button. when user clicks on go button, I sends page by using javascript dosubmit which updates values in table through update process. everything works fine but sometimes i am not able to read particular value in row. for example...
Rownum---------select_list--------- button---------- comment(editable)-not used apex_item
1------------------------ 'abc'---------------- GO----------------------------- new
2------------------------- null---------------- GO--------------------------- closed
3 ------------------------'xyz'---------------- GO--------------------------- reopen
I used apex_item for select list but status is made editable by selecting "text area" from tabular form element of column.
when I press GO button on row third by selecting xyz it takes null value of 2nd row. same if I select something in 2nd row. i.e. instead of null if I selects 'mno' in 2nd row it takes select list value as 'mno' for third row. I observed this by writing javascript code which alerts me value of variable f01,f02.....
Please if anybody can help me. I want to know why this happens?You might have better luck asking in the Oracle Application Express (APEX).
-
X120e : SIW reports that BIOS gives Wrong Values re: Memory. Is this new?
hello
I had just updated to the latest bios so don't know if something is amiss there. my x120e has one mem module, a 4gb Crucial part, runs fine, no bsods no errors that are apparent to the user.
anyone know what causes this or if it is spurious? the main reason I would like to know is that I was about to buy a matching 4gb module, but if perchance the part in here is not just-right for this system, then I shall buy 2 in a matched pair and sell this one.
thanks for your helpWhat is SIW reporting? What is expected?
W520: i7-2720QM, Q2000M at 1080/688/1376, 21GB RAM, 500GB + 750GB HDD, FHD screen
X61T: L7500, 3GB RAM, 500GB HDD, XGA screen, Ultrabase
Y3P: 5Y70, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, QHD+ screen -
Select for update gives wrong results. Is it a bug?
Hi,
Select for update gives wrong results. Is it a bug?
CREATE TABLE TaxIds
TaxId NUMBER(6) NOT NULL,
LocationId NUMBER(3) NOT NULL,
Status NUMBER(1)
PARTITION BY LIST (LocationId)
PARTITION P111 VALUES (111),
PARTITION P222 VALUES (222),
PARTITION P333 VALUES (333)
ALTER TABLE TaxIds ADD ( CONSTRAINT PK_TaxIds PRIMARY KEY (TaxId));
CREATE INDEX NI_TaxIdsStatus ON TaxIds ( NVL(Status,0) ) LOCAL;
Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100101, 111, NULL);
Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100102, 111, NULL);
Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100103, 111, NULL);
Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100104, 111, NULL);
Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200101, 222, NULL);
Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200102, 222, NULL);
Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200103, 222, NULL);
--Session_1 return TAXID=100101
select TAXID from TAXIDS where LOCATIONID=111 and NVL(STATUS,0)=0 AND rownum=1 for update
--Session_2 waits commit
select TAXID from TAXIDS where LOCATIONID=111 and NVL(STATUS,0)=0 AND rownum=1 for update
--Session_1
update TAXIDS set STATUS=1 Where TaxId=100101;
commit;
--Session_2 return 100101 opps!?
--Session_1 return TAXID=100102
select TAXID, STATUS from TAXIDS where LOCATIONID=111 and NVL(STATUS,0)=0 AND rownum=1 for update
--Session_2 waits commit
select TAXID, STATUS from TAXIDS where LOCATIONID=111 and NVL(STATUS,0)=0 AND rownum=1 for update
--Session_1
update TAXIDS set STATUS=1 Where TaxId=100102;
commit;
--Session_2 return 100103This is a bug. Got to be a bug.
This should be nothing to do with indeterminate results from ROWNUM, and nothing to do with read consistency at the point of statement start time in session2., surely.
Session 2 should never return 100101 once the lock from session 1 is released.
The SELECT FOR UPDATE should restart and 100101 should not be selected as it does not meet the criteria of the select.
A statement restart should ensure this.
A number of demos highlight this.
Firstly, recall the original observation in the original test case.
Setup
SQL> DROP TABLE taxids;
Table dropped.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE TABLE TaxIds
2 (TaxId NUMBER(6) NOT NULL,
3 LocationId NUMBER(3) NOT NULL,
4 Status NUMBER(1))
5 PARTITION BY LIST (LocationId)
6 (PARTITION P111 VALUES (111),
7 PARTITION P222 VALUES (222),
8 PARTITION P333 VALUES (333));
Table created.
SQL>
SQL> ALTER TABLE TaxIds ADD ( CONSTRAINT PK_TaxIds PRIMARY KEY (TaxId));
Table altered.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE INDEX NI_TaxIdsStatus ON TaxIds ( NVL(Status,0) ) LOCAL;
Index created.
SQL>
SQL>
SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100101, 111, NULL);
1 row created.
SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100102, 111, NULL);
1 row created.
SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100103, 111, NULL);
1 row created.
SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100104, 111, NULL);
1 row created.
SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200101, 222, NULL);
1 row created.
SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200102, 222, NULL);
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> Original observation:
Session1>SELECT taxid
2 FROM taxids
3 WHERE locationid = 111
4 AND NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
5 AND ROWNUM = 1
6 FOR UPDATE;
TAXID
100101
Session1>
--> Session 2 with same statement hangs until
Session1>BEGIN
2 UPDATE taxids SET status=1 WHERE taxid=100101;
3 COMMIT;
4 END;
5 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Session1>
--> At which point, Session 2 returns
Session2>SELECT taxid
2 FROM taxids
3 WHERE locationid = 111
4 AND NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
5 AND ROWNUM = 1
6 FOR UPDATE;
TAXID
100101
Session2>There's no way that session 2 should have returned 100101. That is the point of FOR UPDATE. It completely reintroduces the lost UPDATE scenario.
Secondly, what happens if we drop the index.
Let's reset the data and drop the index:
Session1>UPDATE taxids SET status=0 where taxid=100101;
1 row updated.
Session1>commit;
Commit complete.
Session1>drop index NI_TaxIdsStatus;
Index dropped.
Session1>Then try again:
Session1>SELECT taxid
2 FROM taxids
3 WHERE locationid = 111
4 AND NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
5 AND ROWNUM = 1
6 FOR UPDATE;
TAXID
100101
Session1>
--> Session 2 hangs again until
Session1>BEGIN
2 UPDATE taxids SET status=1 WHERE taxid=100101;
3 COMMIT;
4 END;
5 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Session1>
--> At which point in session 2:
Session2>SELECT taxid
2 FROM taxids
3 WHERE locationid = 111
4 AND NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
5 AND ROWNUM = 1
6 FOR UPDATE;
TAXID
100102
Session2>Proves nothing, Non-deterministic ROWNUM you say.
Then let's reset, recreate the index and explicity ask then for row 100101.
It should give the same result as the ROWNUM query without any doubts over the ROWNUM, etc.
If the original behaviour was correct, session 2 should also be able to get 100101:
Session1>SELECT taxid
2 FROM taxids
3 WHERE locationid = 111
4 AND NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
5 AND taxid = 100101
6 FOR UPDATE;
TAXID
100101
Session1>
--> same statement hangs in session 2 until
Session1>BEGIN
2 UPDATE taxids SET status=1 WHERE taxid=100101;
3 COMMIT;
4 END;
5 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Session1>
--> so session 2 stops being blocked and:
Session2>SELECT taxid
2 FROM taxids
3 WHERE locationid = 111
4 AND NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
5 AND taxid = 100101
6 FOR UPDATE;
no rows selected
Session2>Of course, this is how it should happen, surely?
Just to double check, let's reintroduce ROWNUM but force the order by to show it's not about read consistency at the start of the statement - restart should prevent it.
(reset, then)
Session1> select t.taxid
2 from
3 (select taxid, rowid rd
4 from taxids
5 where locationid = 111
6 and nvl(status,0) = 0
7 order by taxid) x
8 , taxids t
9 where t.rowid = x.rd
10 and rownum = 1
11 for update of t.status;
TAXID
100101
Session1>
--> Yes, session 2 hangs until...
Session1>BEGIN
2 UPDATE taxids SET status=1 WHERE taxid=100101;
3 COMMIT;
4 END;
5 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Session1>
--> and then
Session2> select t.taxid
2 from
3 (select taxid, rowid rd
4 from taxids
5 where locationid = 111
6 and nvl(status,0) = 0
7 order by taxid) x
8 , taxids t
9 where t.rowid = x.rd
10 and rownum = 1
11 for update of t.status;
TAXID
100102
Session2>Session 2 should never be allowed to get 100101 once the lock is released.
This is a bug.
The worrying thing is that I can reproduce in 9.2.0.8 and 11.2.0.2. -
Inter company Billing is taking a wrong value of the Bill
Inter company Billing is taking a wrong value of the Bill
Hi,
Can you give more information about this.
Paul -
How to check wrong values in isChangedByClient
Hi,
I had two issues with a validation code.
First let me describe the scenario.
We need to update the Vendor Master.
There should one primary contact against one Vendor Number.
There are multiple Secondary contact against one primary contact.
There are 4 fields for both primary and secondary contact.
Primary Contact:
First Name (Read Only, Mandatory).
Last Name (Read Only, Mandatrory).
Mobile Number (Mandatory).
Telephone (Optional).
Secondary Contact:
First Name (Mandatory).
Last Name (Mandatory).
Mobile Number (Mandatory).
Telephone (Optional).
So, I need to check two validations by Java Regular Expressions,
Name should be alphabets with ,. and space.
Telephone Number and Mobile Number would be Numbers only.
Now, the issue client wants the Sceondary Contacts table rows
can be modified without selecting them.
So, I used isChangedByClient.
That's working fine.
But the user gives First Name as Kaushik45 in first row of the secondary contact table
and also types First Name as Subho67 in third row.
The first wrong value get printed (by wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager) but
the control goes to the last wrong value.
This might be solved by using setLeadSelectionAt(i).
Now, when the user types values wrongly in First Name field for Row 1 and Row 3;
the user gets stuck in First Row.
He modifies and then click the update again.
This time update runs and update the wrong value at row 3.
So, solution might be storing all wrong values of the isChangedByClient in an array and then comparing one by one.
Please suggest.
Regards
Kaushik BanerjeeHi Ilan,
I am pasting the code below.
public void onActionconf(com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.api.IWDCustomEvent wdEvent )
//@@begin onActionconf(ServerEvent)
MessageManager msgmanager=(MessageManager)wdThis.wdGetAPI().getComponent().getMessageManager();
IPrivateMainView.IP_personNode testNodeP = wdContext.nodeP_person();
//IPrivateMainView.IS_personNode testNodeS = wdContext.nodeS_person();
IPrivateMainView.IS_personNode S_personNode = wdContext.nodeS_person();
IPrivateMainView.IS_personNode spersonNode = wdContext.nodeVendorDetails().nodeS_person();
IPrivateMainView.IP_personElement testElementP = testNodeP.currentP_personElement();
if(testNodeP.size()!=0){
/*If else for tesElementP Namev null value check */
if(testElementP.getNamev()!=null)
/*Start of if-else for testElementP Mob Number */
if(testElementP.getMob_Number()!=null){
String Mob_num = testElementP.getMob_Number();
String regStrforPriMob= "[0-9]*";
CharSequence chSeqForMob = Mob_num;
Pattern patternForPriMob = Pattern.compile(regStrforPriMob);
Matcher matcherForPriMob = null;
matcherForPriMob = patternForPriMob.matcher(chSeqForMob);
/* Start of matcher if-else*/
if(matcherForPriMob.matches()==true){
if(testElementP.getTel_Number()!=null) {
String tel_num = testElementP.getTel_Number();
String regStrforPriTel = "[0-9]*";
CharSequence chSeqForTel = tel_num;
Pattern patternForPriTel = Pattern.compile(regStrforPriTel);
Matcher matcherForPriTel = null;
matcherForPriTel = patternForPriTel.matcher(chSeqForTel);
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportSuccess("The Telephone Number of Primary Number is matching");
if(matcherForPriTel.matches()==true){
if(S_personNode.size()!=0){
//IPrivateMainView.IS_personElement S_personElement = S_personNode.currentS_personElement();
// for(int i=0;i<wdContext.nodeS_person().size();i++) {
/*Start of Secondary Contact Mob Number and Tel Number if-else */
for(int i=0;i<wdContext.nodeS_person().size();i++){
if(wdContext.nodeS_person().getS_personElementAt(i).isChangedByClient()==true){
IPrivateMainView.IS_personElement S_personElement = (IPrivateMainView.IS_personElement)S_personNode.getElementAt(i);
String fName = wdContext.nodeS_person().getElementAt(i).getAttributeAsText("Namev");
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportSuccess("The First Name for the Secondary Contact is :"+fName);
String regStrforSecfName = "[a-zA-Z-øØæÆåÅ,. ]*";
CharSequence chSeqforSecFname = fName;
Pattern patternForSecfName = Pattern.compile(regStrforSecfName);
Matcher matcherForSecfName = null;
matcherForSecfName = patternForSecfName.matcher(chSeqforSecFname);
//String lName = S_personElement.getName1();
String lName = wdContext.nodeS_person().getElementAt(i).getAttributeAsText("Name1");
String regStrforSeclName = "[a-zA-Z-øØæÆåÅ,. ]*";
CharSequence chSeqForSecLname = lName;
Pattern patternForSeclName = Pattern.compile(regStrforSeclName);
Matcher matcherForSeclName = null;
matcherForSeclName = patternForSeclName.matcher(chSeqForSecLname);
//String Mob_NumSec = S_personElement.getMob_Number();
String Mob_NumSec = wdContext.nodeS_person().getElementAt(i).getAttributeAsText("Mob_Number");
String regStrforSecMob ="[0-9]*";
CharSequence chSeqForMobSec = Mob_NumSec;
Pattern patternForSecMob = Pattern.compile(regStrforSecMob);
Matcher matcherForSecMob = null;
matcherForSecMob = patternForSecMob.matcher(chSeqForMobSec);
if(S_personElement.getMob_Number()!=null&&S_personElement.getNamev()!=null&&S_personElement.getName1()!=null){
//String fName = S_personElement.getNamev();
/* Start of matcher if-else*/
if(matcherForSecfName.matches()==true&&matcherForSeclName.matches()==true&&matcherForSecMob.matches()==true){
/* Start of City if-else */
if(S_personElement.getTel_Number()!=null){
String Tel_NumSec = wdContext.nodeS_person().getElementAt(i).getAttributeAsText("Tel_Number");
String regStrforSecTel = "[0-9]*";
CharSequence chSeqForTelSec = Tel_NumSec;
Pattern patternForSecTel = Pattern.compile(regStrforSecTel);
Matcher matcherForSecTel = null;
matcherForSecTel = patternForSecTel.matcher(chSeqForTelSec);
/* Start of matcher if-else */
if(matcherForSecTel.matches()==true&&matcherForSecfName.matches()==true&&matcherForSeclName.matches()==true&&matcherForSecMob.matches()==true){
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportSuccess("The First Name matches the pattern: "+matcherForSecfName.matches());
if(wdContext.currentCheckboxckElement().getCorrespondence()==true){
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportSuccess("Entering the if statement for executing the RFC");
wdThis.wdGetVdapplicationController().updVendorDetails();
wdThis.wdFirePlugToFinal();
//break;
else
{ IWDAttributeInfo atinfo = wdContext.nodeCheckboxck().getNodeInfo().getAttribute("Correspondence");
msgmanager.reportContextAttributeMessage(wdContext.nodeCheckboxck().getCurrentElement(),atinfo,IMessageVdapplication.KEY4,new Object[]{},true);
//wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportException("Kryss av for korrekt informasjon før lagring",true);
} /* End of check box if else*/
} /* End of Secondary Contact Telephone Number matching */
else {
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().raiseException("The Secondary Contact Telephone Number is not matching",true);
} /* End of Secondary Telephone Number if */
/* End of matcher if-else*/
else {
//wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager.re("The Mobile Number is not in the correct format for Secondary contact",true);
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportSuccess("The First Name was : "+wdContext.nodeS_person().getElementAt(i).getAttributeValue("Namev"));
//Object[] firName = new Object<i>;
// firName<i> = wdContext.nodeS_person().getElementAt(i).getAttributeValue("Namev");
wdContext.nodeS_person().setLeadSelection(i);
// for(int j=0;j<firName.length;j++)
/* try {
String fuName = wdContext.nodeS_person().getElementAt(i).getAttributeValue("Namev").toString();
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportSuccess("The Value of fuName: "+fuName);
//String fName = S_personElement.getNamev();
String regStrforFuName = "[a-zA-Z-øØæÆåÅ,. ]*";
CharSequence chSeqforFuName = fuName;
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportSuccess("The Value of CharSequence "+chSeqforFuName);
Pattern patternForSecFuName = Pattern.compile(regStrforFuName);
Matcher matcherForSecFuName = null;
matcherForSecFuName = patternForSecFuName.matcher(chSeqforFuName);
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportSuccess("The matcherForSecFuName is "+matcherForSecFuName);
if(matcherForSecFuName.matches()==false){
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportException("Error in the First Name",true);
catch(ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException ae){
ae.printStackTrace();
catch(Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
//String fuName = wdContext.nodeS_person().getElementAt(i).getAttributeValue("Namev");
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportException("The First Name, Last Name or Mobile Number is not in the correct format for Secondary contact",true);
// break;
else {
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().raiseException("First Name, Last Name, Mobile Number is blank",true);
else {
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().raiseException("The Telephone Number of the Primary Contact is in the Correct format",true);
} /* Telephone Number element null*/
//else{}
/*Start of Secondary Contact Size if-else */
/* End of if-else for Secondary Contact Size */
// else {
// wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportException("The Mobile No of the Primary Contact is not in the correct format",true);
/* End of matcher if-else for Primary Contact*/
else{
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportException("Primary Contact Mobile Nunber is not in the correct format",true);
/* if for testElementP Mob Number */
else {
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportException("No Primary Contact Mobile Number",true);
} /* End of If else for tesElementP Namev null value check */
else {
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportException("There is no First Name for Primary Contact",true);
}// else if for testNodeP size closed
else{
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportException("There is no element in Primary Contact",true);
//@@end
Regards
Kaushik Banerjee -
Hello experts,
Our company uses Oracle 10g DB and we are using Stored Procedures to fetch employees data from various tables. We fetch only fresh data depending on the date when it is retrived. Hence the result of the query depends on Sysdate value. The databse has two instances and all are synchronised to same local time.
Recently we noticed that sometimes we get stale data which can only happen when sysdate value is not ccorrect. Can anyone suggest under what circumstances Oracle might return wrong value of sysdate?
Thanks in advance.........Thanks evryone for your suggestions. But i have tried "Select Sysdate from Dual". It always gives me correct date. But the problem is very sporadic. Most of the times, the stored procedure returns correct value but occasionally it retrives stale data.
Through java logs(we invoke SP from java code), we could find out that the data returned was stale. This brought us to the conclusion that sysdate being used is incorrect sometimes.
We asked DBA team who confirmed that All Instances of DB are synched up and have same Sysdate.
Can you please suggest some way to trace the actual query being executed to fetch the result. This would unveil the actual problem ( which we believe is the incorrect sysdate value ) . On being asked, DBA suggested that such tracing cannot be done as it would impact performance of all other systems using same DB.
Can you please help on this? -
S981 info structure wrong value update
Dear all
The info structure (S981 - Man-Hours Utilization) has updated wrong value for one operation both planned work hour and actual work hour. Can any one suggest me how to revoke/correct the actual planned hours and actual confirmed hours. Any SAP note need to be applied kindly give me your suggestion.S981 is not custom defined structure,You would have to provide more details to get some help.
Regards
Narasimhan -
Webi base on BW query based on Infoset comes back with wrong values
Hello:
I have a Webi report on an OLAP Universe, on Bex Query.
The bex query is based on 1 INFOSET.
When I run the webi report the values that comes back a totally wrong values.
The correct results are not brought back.
When I do a test with crystal reports to the infoset, I can see the correct values. (I'm aware crystal uses different drivers).
The test is BW query designer, and crystal brings back proper values from Infoset based BW query.
Webi on Infoset based BW Query comes back with wrong data.
query is simple.
Pull in 3 attributes, 3 key figures, where componentkey = "111"
I get 36 rows in Crystal and 36 rows in Bex Analyzer, 36 rows in BW query designer (web analyzer).
I get many rows in webi (almost like a CARTENSIAN product).
I search a round this forum but still did not see a conclusive answer to this problem.
But I see another thread that several others faced this same issue without a resolution.
My environment.
BOE XI 3.1 SP2
No fix packs
SAP IK 3.1 SP2
HPUX-IA64
Thanks in advance for any help.
DwayneWas this problem ever solved?
I am having a similar problem with an infoset based query.
I have created the BW infoset, and confirmed that the correct data is returned from the underlying infoproviders. A simple BW query on that infoset yields the same results.
Create the universe, and then the WEBI, and WEBI now shows hundreds of records where I expect 10. Data is being returned in WEBI that definitely shouldn't be there. It's almost like the restrictions applied in the characteristic restriction area of my BW query are being ignored, even if I include them in the WEBI query.
Cheers,
Andrew -
Full Points sure: Wrong values populating in report (BEX)
Hi Gurus,
I got an Issue on CRM Report. Report is populating wrong values.
In the report, We have structure called Opportunity (in that structure fields are New opportunity, Close opportunity, Win opportunity and Open opportunity) in query and One key figure called Revenue.
On revenue we have one condition with variables. But, in that condition everything is fine.
The Condition Screen is like this:
Radio Button: Single characteristic is selected
"Opportunity Sales ID" selected in Characteristics.
Keyfigures:
Revenue New Opp TOP N TOP X OPP
Revenue Open Opp TOP N TOP X OPP
Revenue WINS TOP N TOP X OPP
Revenue Lost TOP N TOP X OPP
everything is right in this: If we select top 10 opportunities. we are getting wrong values
for ex: if we select top 10 Opportunities (in the selection screen) means REVENUES.
We are getting 12 values. 10 values are correct remaining 2 values are wrong..
There is no Update routine for revenue keyfield.
Can please suggest me on this What are possibilities for wrong values ...
FULL POINTS SURE FOR THIS
THANKS,
KNHi All,
Can anybody answer... this...
thanks,
KR
Maybe you are looking for
-
Impossible to access catalogue due to unexpected error
Hello eveyone, I have been using LR 5 for quite some time. Working just fine. I got a new I Mac in replacement of my old one but since I changed I cannot access my catalogue (xxx.lrcat) usually located in a special dedicated desk external hard drive.
-
Best practice from passing messages from servlets
Is there a best practice for passing user messages (typically errors) back to the page from servlets? e.g. http://localhost:4502/content/geometrixx/en.html?message=Some user error message Dan
-
hi experts, while going through the postings in forums regarding events in table maint. generator I came across the terms extracts and total . Can anybody please explian to me what is this extract and total? regards pankaj
-
hello !! I want some help to make a flash gallery the gallery is in this site: http://www.silversteinproperties.com/ I make buttons for the thumbnails.. but I need the code, can you give me help, some tutorial or something?? Thanks a lot Bruno
-
FTP server not connected from SAP
Hi Expert, I want to access FTP server thru SAP.But when I try to check RFC Destination SAPFTP connection test. It's gives error 'Error Details timeout during allocate / CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPCMRCV' : cmRc=20 thRc=456 Timeout dur' What will be the rea