Getting Error: The number range is not maintained for Object/Year: J_1ILIC/

Hi Gurus,
When I try to capture deemed export license from J1ILIC01 I get this error
The number range is not maintained for Object/Year: J_1ILIC/
I tried to maintain number ranges in SNRO & SNUM  there the changes are saved but I am not able to capture the license and receive the same error again. Please help.

Hi
Just check if you have maintained number range for the correct year as shown in error.
Goto SNRO/SNUM enter the object ID and click on number range .Maintain there for that particular year.

Similar Messages

  • The number range is not maintained for Object/Year: J_1ILIC/

    Hello,
    I am facing the problem as
    After Created the No range object j_1ilic for excise bond, for capturing the CT3 form in J1ILIC01 and maintain the required fields in J1ILIC01, following error is occuring
    "The number range is not maintained for Object/Year: J_1ILIC/"
    Kindly advice on the same
    Thanx in advance
    Shailesh

    Hi,
    You will have maintain the Number range for the Lisence for the object J_1ILIC through SNRO.
    Regards,
    Murali

  • Message no. 8I766 Number Ranges are not maintained For Extended Withholding

    Dear All,
    I am facing the following problem when i am trying to generate the withholding tax certificate
    1.) Message no. 8I766 Number Ranges are not maintained For Extended Withholding Tax 
         Number Ranges are not maintained for Business Place and Section. Check entries in tables J_1iewt_cert  (for Business Place) or J_1iewt_cert_n (for Section Code) and j_1iewt_certno  in EWT.
    I have checked all the above tables and found that the entries are maintained
    2) When i am trying for print priview and then print its generating spool request and the certificate is getting saved -
    > here the following problems are faced
          A) . TDS Number is not coming
          B).Details Of the tax deductor ( Name , Adress , TDS Circle , TAN & PAN is not coming Where       to update these details
          C) In Amount Paid / Credited Column - Some fixed amount is comming irrespective of the actual amount credited
    Please help me in soving the above issues
    Thanks & Regards
    Arun.R

    Hi
    You need to maintain Section Code wise number range . Go to Sm30 Select Table J_1IEWT_CERT_N and maintain it.
    Thanks
    GG

  • Funds mngt - Number range 01 not found for object BULI_DOCNR

    Hi all
    need some urgent help to crack an error am getting while creating a budget in funds management.
    the error am getting is
    "Number range 01 not found for object BULI_DOCNR in fiscal year 2007"
    I have maintained the number range in
    Public Sector Management-Budgetary control system-Budgeting-Budget Entry Documents-Maintain Number Range Interval for Entry Documents.
    But am still getting the error....
    will really appreciate some help on this
    thanks in advance

    The number range object refers to  "FM budgeting line item number "
    Are you using Former budgeting or BCS ?
    Try t-code- ok11 and ok91 under former budgeting.
    Thanks
    Siva

  • Number range interval not found for object ISH_NLEI in executing NP38

    Dear ALL,
    In executing Transaction NP38 when we save the surgical procedure codes the system
    generates an error message "number range interval not found " . The object referred here
    ISH_NLEI number range has already been defined in spro Define technical number range.
    Please assist what should be done here to resolve the problem.
    Regards
    Ramit

    Hi, check if it maintained in tcode snro for this object

  • SAP CRM Error: A number range is not assigned to account group

    Hi Experts,
    We have a stuck BDOC for a BP with "ZEmployee" (custom) role in CRM with error as "Fill in Required fields". We knew this is b'cos one of the mandatory field in not maintained in CRM. After maintaining the mandatory field in CRM; we are re-processing the stuck BDOC and again it is getting into the error message with error "A number range is not assigned to account group Sold-to party".
    We have checked the number range and grouping configuration both in ECC and CRM. But still not able to identify the gaps. Is there a detailed step-by-step approach which can be taken up to resolve the issue.
    Request you quick response.
    Thanks,
    Chaudh.

    HI Chaudh,
    I am facing similiar issue. When i am creating BP in CRM WebUI, I am getting an error message: "Error in Transporting Number Range".
    Could you please share your findings, how you solved your issue?
    Dave

  • BDOC Error: A number range is not assigned to account group Sold-to party

    Hi Experts,
    We have a stuck BDOC for a BP with "ZEmployee" (custom) role in CRM with error as "Fill in Required fields". We knew this is b'cos one of the mandatory field in not maintained in CRM. After maintaining the mandatory field in CRM; we are re-processing the stuck BDOC and again it is getting into the error message with error "A number range is not assigned to account group Sold-to party".
    We have checked the number range and grouping configuration both in ECC and CRM. But still not able to identify the gaps. Is there a detailed step-by-step approach which can be taken up to resolve the issue.
    Request you quick response.
    Thanks,
    Chaudh.

    Hi Chaudh,
    Please find the exact solution here.
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/CRM/IssuesduringBusinessPartnerreplicationbetweenCRMandERP
    Cheers,
    Josh

  • Boot camp 4.0 getting error the installer disc could not be found

    boot camp 4.0 getting error the installer disc could not be found.

    See if Windows 8 RP x64 works as an experiment.
    Usually slowest burn speed will.
    I am assuming that smething changed but there are I presume a number of other people who have, and folks with new MacBook Air too.

  • Error FGV002: Fiscal year variant & is not maintained for calendar year &

    Hi all,
    I am facing a unique problem in BW production. This is not happeneing in my Development.
    Whenever I goto table    "/BI0/SFISCPER" or do F4 on any Fiscal Year / Peiod field, I get the message " Error FGV002: Fiscal year variant R1 is not maintained for calendar year 2005"  . In my client R1 is Shortened Fiscal Year.  But we are not using this for year 2005 and most years. And the message is Type Error. I tried to debug but the code enters in 100 odd Function Modules and does not give any answer.
    My Finance Person has checked the settings in transaction SPRO > SAP Reference IMG > BW Customizing Implementation Guide > Business Information Warehouse > General BW Settings > Maintain Fiscal Year Variant). They are exactly identical to R/3 production setting.
    I have already done rebuild of Fiscal Year Variant from Source System by right clicking and loading data again.
    I am using BW 3.0B with Bi Content 3.1 . Please advise urgently.

    Hi TCS
    Please check these SAP notes in advance:
    1619823
    1835628
    Please advice if this helps.
    Regards
    PC

  • SAP BW DTP error: Fiscal year variant is not maintained for calendar year

    Hi experts,
    Running DTP for loading 2LIS_12_VCITM results in following error "Fiscal year variant A2 is not maintained for calendar year 2012".
    I have already done following checks:
    - the fiscal variant A2 exists for the fiscal year 2012 in the BW system (T009 tables)
    - the DTP does only give this error for 2 company codes, and works fine for other company codes
    - in our R3 system, the fiscal year variant A2 is assigned to all the company codes, how or where can I check this assignment in the BW system ?
    Kind regards, Guy Verschueren

    Hi
    Please check the following threads
    "Fiscal year variant V3 is not maintained for calendar year 2011" (OAOB)
    Error FGV002: Fiscal year variant & is not maintained for calendar year &
    Hope it helps.
    Thanks,
    Rajesh.
    Please assign points to answers if you find them heplful

  • Getting error wrong number or type of parameters for EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB

    Hi All,
    I am Getting error wrong number or type of parameters for EAM_WO_PROCESS_PUB.PROCESS_WO API, pls any body can help me,pls send code for
    EAM_WO_PROCESS_PUB.PROCESS_WO API.
    Thanks&Reagrds,
    Hanimi Reddy.

    Hi srini,
    I developed code for work order api EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.PROCESS_MASTER_CHILD_WO following and i am getting error wrong number or types of arguments in call to 'PROCESS_MASTER_CHILD_WO, pls see the code and help me
    CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE SANG_WR_TO_WO_API/*(ERRBUF OUT VARCHAR2, RETCODE OUT VARCHAR2)*/ IS
    v_created_by number;
    v_updated_by number;
    v_updated_name varchar2(30);
    V_ENTITY_ID VARCHAR2(30);
    l_EAM_WO_RELATIONS_TBL EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.EAM_WO_RELATIONS_TBL_type ;
    --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.g_miss_EAM_WO_RELATIONS_rec;
    l_eam_wo_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_wo_rec_type; --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_EAM_WO_rec;
    l_eam_op_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_op_tbl_type ;--:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_op_tbl;
    l_eam_op_network_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_op_network_tbl_type; --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_op_network_tbl;
    l_eam_res_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_tbl_type;--:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_res_tbl;
    l_eam_res_inst_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_inst_tbl_type; --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_res_inst_tbl;
    l_eam_sub_res_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_sub_res_tbl_type; --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_sub_res_tbl ;
    -- l_eam_res_usage_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_usage_tbl_type := EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_res_usage_tbl;
    l_eam_mat_req_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_mat_req_tbl_type; --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_mat_req_tbl ;
    l_eam_direct_items_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_direct_items_tbl_type; --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_direct_items_tbl ;
    l_x_eam_wo_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_wo_rec_type; --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_wo_rec;
    l__x_EAM_WO_RELATIONS_TBL EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.EAM_WO_RELATIONS_TBL_type ;--:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.g_miss_EAM_WO_RELATIONS_TBL;
    l_x_eam_op_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_op_rec_type; --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_op_rec ;
    l_x_eam_op_network_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_op_network_tbl_type; --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_op_network_tbl;
    l_x_eam_res_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_tbl_type; --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_res_tbl;
    l_x_eam_res_inst_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_inst_tbl_type; --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_res_inst_tbl ;
    l_x_eam_sub_res_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_sub_res_tbl_type; --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_sub_res_tbl;
    -- l_x_eam_res_usage_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_usage_tbl_type := EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_res_usage_tbl ;
    l_x_eam_mat_req_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_mat_req_tbl_type; --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_mat_req_tbl;
    l_x_eam_direct_items_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_direct_items_tbl_type; --:= EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.G_MISS_eam_direct_items_tbl ;
    l_x_return_status VARCHAR2(30);
    l_x_msg_count NUMBER;
    l_x_debug VARCHAR2(30);
    l_output_dir VARCHAR2(30);
    l_debug_filename VARCHAR2(30) ;
    l_debug_file_mode VARCHAR2(30) ;
    CURSOR CUR_WTW IS
    SELECT
    EWR.WIP_ENTITY_ID
    ,EWR.WIP_ENTITY_NAME
    ,EWR.ORGANIZATION_ID
    ,WAC.ORGANIZATION_CODE
    ,EWR.DESCRIPTION
    ,EWR.ASSET_GROUP_ID
    ,EWR.ASSET_NUMBER
    ,EWR.ASSET_NUMBER_DESCRIPTION
    ,WAC.ACCOUNTING_CLASS
    ,WAC.MATERIAL_ACCOUNT
    ,WAC.MATERIAL_OVERHEAD_ACCOUNT
    ,WAC.RESOURCE_ACCOUNT
    ,WAC.OUTSIDE_PROCESSING_ACCOUNT
    ,WAC.MATERIAL_VARIANCE_ACCOUNT
    ,WAC.RESOURCE_VARIANCE_ACCOUNT
    ,WAC.OUTSIDE_PROC_VARIANCE_ACCOUNT
    ,WAC.STD_COST_ADJUSTMENT_ACCOUNT
    ,WAC.OVERHEAD_ACCOUNT
    ,WAC.OVERHEAD_VARIANCE_ACCOUNT
    ,EWR.WORK_REQUEST_OWNING_DEPT_ID
    ,EWR.WORK_REQUEST_OWNING_DEPT
    ,EWR.WORK_REQUEST_PRIORITY_ID
    ,EWR.WORK_REQUEST_PRIORITY
    ,EWR.WORK_REQUEST_STATUS_ID
    ,WAC.ORGANIZATION_NAME
    FROM
    WIP_EAM_WORK_REQUESTS_V EWR
    ,WIPFV_ACCOUNTING_CLASSES WAC
    ,WIP_EAM_PARAMETERS WAP
    WHERE
    EWR.ORGANIZATION_ID = WAC.ORGANIZATION_ID
    AND WAC.ORGANIZATION_ID = WAP.ORGANIZATION_ID
    AND WAC.ACCOUNTING_CLASS = WAP.DEFAULT_EAM_CLASS
    AND EWR.WORK_REQUEST_STATUS = 'Awaiting Work Order';
    BEGIN
    --i number := 1;
    FND_GLOBAL.apps_initialize (1001255, 50326, 700, 0);
    V_CREATED_BY := FND_GLOBAL.USER_ID;
    V_UPDATED_BY := FND_GLOBAL.USER_ID;
    v_updated_name := FND_GLOBAL.USER_name;
    for rec in cur_wtw loop
    l_eam_wo_tbl.WIP_ENTITY_ID := rec.wip_entity_id;
    l_eam_wo_tbl.ORGANIZATION_ID := rec.ORGANIZATION_ID ;
    l_eam_wo_tbl.ASSET_NUMBER := rec.ASSET_NUMBER;
    l_eam_wo_tbl.ASSET_GROUP_ID := rec.ASSET_GROUP_ID ;
    l_eam_wo_tbl.DESCRIPTION := rec.DESCRIPTION ;
    --SELECT WIP_ENTITIES_S.NEXTval INTO V_ENTITY_ID FROM DUAL;
    EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.PROCESS_MASTER_CHILD_WO
    (P_PO_IDENTIFIER => 'EAM'
    ,P_API_VERSION_NUMBER => 1.0
    ,P_INIT_MSG_LIST => FALSE
    ,P_EAM_WO_RELATIONS_TBL => l_EAM_WO_RELATIONS_TBL
    ,P_EAM_WO_tbl => l_eam_wo_tbl
    , p_eam_op_tbl => l_eam_op_tbl
    , p_eam_op_network_tbl => l_eam_op_network_tbl
    , p_eam_res_tbl => l_eam_res_tbl
    , p_eam_res_inst_tbl => l_eam_res_inst_tbl
    , p_eam_sub_res_tbl => l_eam_sub_res_tbl
    --, p_eam_res_usage_tbl => l_eam_res_usage_tbl
    , p_eam_mat_req_tbl => l_eam_mat_req_tbl
    , p_eam_direct_items_tbl => l_eam_direct_items_tbl
    , x_eam_wo_tbl => l_x_eam_wo_tbl
    , X_EAM_WO_RELATIONS_TBL => l__x_EAM_WO_RELATIONS_TBL
    , x_eam_op_tbl => l_x_eam_op_tbl
    , x_eam_op_network_tbl => l_x_eam_op_network_tbl
    , x_eam_res_tbl => l_x_eam_res_tbl
    , x_eam_res_inst_tbl => l_x_eam_res_inst_tbl
    , x_eam_sub_res_tbl => l_x_eam_sub_res_tbl
    -- , x_eam_res_usage_tbl =>l_x_eam_res_usage_tbl
    , x_eam_mat_req_tbl => l_x_eam_mat_req_tbl
    , x_eam_direct_items_tbl => l_x_eam_direct_items_tbl
    , x_return_status => l_x_return_status
    , x_msg_count => l_x_msg_count
    ,p_commit =>'N'
    , p_debug => 'N'
    , p_output_dir => NULL
    , p_debug_filename => 'EAM_WO_DEBUG.log'
    , p_debug_file_mode => 'w'
    END LOOP;
    END SANG_WR_TO_WO_API;
    COMMIT;
    Thanks ,
    Hanimi

  • Fiscal year variant is not maintained for calendar year 2009

    Hi,
    After upgrade to BI 7.0 we are getting error: "Fiscal year variant & is not maintained for calendar year 2009" while opening a query through Bex Analyzer.
    Basically it is happening like when we open a particular query, the Variable selection screen comes up, then on clicking the exection button (after selection) it shows SYSTEM_FAILURE exception & clicking the details button, shows the message ""Fiscal year variant is not maintained for calendar year 2009"
    Please provide some information/resolution to this.
    Thanks,
    Shantanu.

    HI,
    Please ensure that you have defined your fiscal year variant in OB29
    correctly.  It is necessary that:
      1.  the previous year has been maintained,
      2.  an entry for Dec 31 exists in each fiscal year,
      3.  the following fiscal year has been maintained.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Nitin

  • Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012

    I am getting this error while scheduling infopackage for 2lis_02_HDR.
    Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012
    PLease let me know how to solve thhe issue.
    Thanks,
    harika.

    Hi,
    Where are you geting error, before execution or duing execution of DTP in the log.
    Check if you have transferred fiscal year variants from source system to BW. Then trigger DTP.
    Regards,
    Pravin Karkhanis.
    Edited by: Pravin Karkhanis on Oct 18, 2011 4:15 AM
    Edited by: Pravin Karkhanis on Oct 18, 2011 4:15 AM

  • Fiscal year "A3" Variant is not maintained for Financila year 2010

    Hello All,
    while creating asset master using AS01 T Code i am getting an error "Fiscal year "A3" Variant is not maintained for Financila year 2010 for Compnay Code 0600".
    but i have configured Fical year variant and assigned to co code, i am able to post the transactions for all the periods i.e financial year 2010.
    here my question is whether we need to maintain the Fiscal year variant separately for Asset accounting in ECC 6.0.
    Please Suggest
    Thanks
    Shankar

    Hi Murali and Christian,
    Thanks for your reply..
    now i have configured year dependent fiscal year to my co code, if i configure calender year i am able to create the Asset master
    please help
    Thanks
    Shankar

  • Close shop order Fiscal year variant B2 is not maintained for calendar year

    Hello,
    I know there are already some threads in the forum about this error, but I could not find an answer that works for me.
    Here is the scenario:
    We do want to close a production order in CO02. (CO02-functions-restrict processing-close).
    I get an error message u201CUnprocessed future change recs for order xxprevent del. flag/completionu201D
    Message no. CO688
    Transaction COFC shows me 6 errors (all the same) for this production order, I guess this might be the reason for the previous error:
    u201CFiscal year variant B2 is not maintained for calendar year 2006u201D
    When I now go into OB29, it shows entries for B2 for the year 2006, it has 12 periods, so it looks fine for me.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks
    Anne

    - check out this note
    https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=487683
    Note 487683 - CO688 for 'complete technically' or set deletion flag
    Symptom
    An order should be technically completed or the deletion flag should be activated for the order.
    The action cannot be carried out since the system issues error message CO688 "Unprocessed future change recs for order & prevent deletion flag/completion".
    Even after you have started report CORUPROC for processing the unprocessed future change records, the action cannot be carried out.
    Other terms
    Archiving, complete technically,
    LÖVM, TABG, CO688, CO 688
    Reason and Prerequisites
    The action cannot be carried out since there are incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual costs for the order.However, this option is not mentioned in the long text of message CO688.
    Solution
    With the aid of Transactions COGI and COFC, you must check whether there are incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual costs for the order and you must post-process them.
    You can change the long text of the message as follows by using Transaction SE91 in order to add missing information:
    Diagnosis
    For the order, you must still process future change records or error records from the confirmation for confirmation processes.These are the possible confirmation processes:
    automatic goods receipt
    backflush
    actual cost determination
    data transfer to HR
    System activities
    For orders with confirmation processes to be post-processed, setting of the deletion flag or of status 'completed' has not been planned.
    Procedure
    You must process the unprocessed future change records with the help of
    predefined confirmation processes</> or
    with the aid of program CORUPROC, when you dispatch it in Customizing in a background job (dispatch background jobs: confirmation processes).
    You must check whether there are incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual cost determination for the order and you might have to post-process them:
    post-processing of incorrect goods movements</>
    post-processing of incorrect actual cost determinations</>

Maybe you are looking for