Getting European Speed Limit Signs in US

Is anyone else in the US getting a Euro Speed limit sign? Not a big deal I guess.

Hope that you have used the in app feedback form as detailed here: http://conversations.nokia.com/2013/05/28/the-here-team-is-listening-to-you/
Happy to have helped forum in a small way with a Support Ratio = 37.0

Similar Messages

Speed limit

Hi!
My turn to ask a question. I read some- and everywhere the Athlon XP has a MHz limit of 2500. It seems to be so, but is it? I tried on my own to find an answer, and below is a result of that, but...
Why I don't ask AMD?! Before asking well-paid and intelligent people, I thought I should try the forum.
Speed limit
Athlon XP and Sempron reached a speed limit
The main difference between the socket A processor nowadays seems to be in the architecture of the cache memories. The speed does not pass 2500 MHz. Why is that?
The first Athlons came in 1999. Their advantages compared to their competitor are/were the number of pipelines and calculation units:
- Three decoders for translating the complex but fundamental CISC-instructions into RISC-instructions. The processor has no problem working with the short and simple RISC-instructions.
- Athlon can have 72 instructions simultaneously, (Pentium III 40, and the earlier K6 only 24).
- Very competent FPU:s, three of them, and as FPU is better at calculating decimal numbers than the main ALU, it makes Athlons good at 3D graphics – where there are lots of that kind of mathematics when producing polygons.
In the beginning Athlons had external Level 2 cache. The cache sat on a slot beside the processor, and the architecture was called slot 1. With XP this changed, both Level 1 and Level 2 cache were built into the processor, and we got the socket A kind. Athlon XP was also built with thinner lines connecting the transistors, and got the ability to handle new instructions, got a better data pre-fetch technology, and an overheating protection.
So what’s the problem? Speed it up!
Well, one bottleneck lies between the processor and the RAM memory, the Front Side Bus (FSB). The processor is much faster than the RAM and process data as they come by. To keep the processor busy mainly Intel invented a sort of pipeline, or ladder. The processor is working on every step.
Data is sent from hardware, like sound data or network data over the PCI-bus, graphics data over the AGP-bus, hard-disk data over the IDE (PCI-/SATA) bus, etc. The data comes in ones and zeroes in little packages, which make up complex instructions. For the processor to be able to efficiently perform the instructions they need to be sized down to simpler instructions, from CISC to RISC. (CISC codes is such a fundamental part of the PC history they must remain.) The sizing down is done in the very beginning of each pipeline. In later steps of the pipeline, the instructions are interpreted further and performed.
Early processors needed one clock-cycle per step in the pipeline, but Athlons can manage 2,5 steps, as can for example Pentium 4. With the pipelines, as said, Athlon XP can do 72 instructions at the same time. Pentium 4 however has longer pipelines – with 20 steps – and can process 126 instructions. But the efficiency of a Pentium 4 is lower, which is why Athlons are quicker at the same MHz. Apple’s (Motorola’s) G4 processor is yet more efficient.
Athlon XP has 10 steps in each pipeline for the “main” ALU processor and 15 for the FPU. The reason why there are not more pipelines is that the processor is not kept busy with the slower RAM, and a lot of clock-cycles would be wasted. What is more, there will be too many erroneous instructions, when the processor has to start over, filling the pipelines with correct instructions.
RAM is slower
This was not the case in the beginning. All ran at the same speed, say 20 MHz: Processor, FSB, RAM-memory, PCI-bus etc. By separating the PCI-bus, which had hardware connected that couldn’t work at higher frequencies, things could start moving.
In 1989 came a Pentium with clock doubling. To compensate for the not ‘doubled RAM, L1 cache was invented. But processors kept getting faster. Next thing to be pushed forward was the FSB, which for socket A boards now is increased to 200 MHz x 2 (DDR). Intel increased it even further, but as the efficiency rate isn’t increasing at the same rats, Intel has backed down from the megahertz spiral, and has followed AMD in other ways of thinking.
So is this the simple basic calculation?
Athlon XP:s can do 2,5 instruction per clock-cycle in 10 steps per pipeline x the number of pipelines. The number of pipelines is limited by the number of instructions sent and their quality, 72 instructions at the same time. Can this be the reason for 2500 MHz limit?

Ok, reality check people...
Sharp, nice explanation, but you are wrong.
the x86 instruction set (including those nice MUL, ADD and other instructions) is a CISC instruction set.
The difference? A MUL takes 12 cycles, a DIV 40 or something...
RISC was a new computing architecture. Each instruction is simpler to allow higher execution frequency.
The efficiency of a computer is judge by the work done. W= IPC x Freq
Frequency is the well known number that we can find on our beloved processors. IPC is the instructions per clock. Why is the athlon more efficient than a P4 at the same frequency? higher IPC.
How do the chip manufacturer choose those factors?
Well, the problem is that the instruction set is FIXED. x86 (or i386), the instruction set, has been defined years ago as CISC and to maintain compatibility, you have to keep it. They then included internal decoders to change those instructions to streams of RISC instructions, each simpler. Those are the ones really implemented.
How does that influence the speed of the processor? Each instruction is executed by a unit (integer unit, floating point, MMX...), the more that unit has to do for that imstruction, the more time it takes (and the more transistor). This has 2 problems:
- one is that it will limit the overall speed as the more complex the unit, the less speedy.
- The second is that it ties down the unit. If you do a div in 40+ clocks, your integer unit is tied during this time.
The answer to this problem? Pipelines.
Pipelines are splitting the tasks in simpler tasks and executing each as independant as possible.
Example: laundry. You need washer and dryer. However, some of your clothes cannot go to the dryer.
Now, you have 2 loads. If you have a combined unit that takes 1.5h for wash + dry, it will take 3h total.
If you have a washer (.5h) and a dryer (1h), you load the first load (.5h) then transfer it to the dryer (1h). While the drier works, you load the next washer (0.5h). If you need it to perform also the drier, total time is 2.5h instead of 3h. If you dont need it, it is even faster 1.5h.
This is the way intel followed. Prescott has a 25+ pipeline. The problem comes from branches. If you misspredict your branch, you have to flush the pipe.
All that to say that with its manufacturing and its architecture, AMD could not release a AXP even close to 2.5GHz. Can you overclock a good unit over that limit? Sure. Intel did not release a 4GHz and yet you can overclock some P4 up to 5GHz (with appropriate cooling).
Oh, and the technology used is 90nm or 0.09um. Athlon XP is not even that small, it was still on 130nm.
This is the smallest critical dimention (smallest trace. Usually smallest transistor width).

Get PO Approval limit for Approver and substitute

Hello all,
Description:
When an approver assigns a substitute for approval, the PO Value Limit (HRP5503-LIMIT) for the position needs to be equal to or greater than that of the approver. If this is not true, then an error message saying u201CSubstitute has insufficient signing authorityu201D should be returned to the user upon adding the substitute.
Logic can be found in SAP program LBW02F01 (include)
under routine FORM / D1328_FIND_DEPUTIES
Here i need to fetch the PO approver details and substitute detaiils.
Please let me know about this.
Thanks in advance

Substitution is for the total inbox ...
I don't think it can be done only for Purchase Order or Shopping Cart or What ever it is...
You can use the Implicit Enhacement Operation to add code to the standard sap code...
Try to re-use the following code and get the value limit from the Business Object BUS4101.
"swc_create_object req_user 'BUS4101' sy-uname.
swc_get_property req_user 'ApprovalLimit' lv_calimit-approval_limit.
swc_get_property req_user 'ApprovalCurrency' lv_calimit-currency."
FORM / D1328_FIND_DEPUTIES -- In this, "gt_deputies" is the standard table used by SAP in the code which stores all the substitute uses..
You need to delete the user entries who are having value limit less than the approver user in the "gt_deputies".
I have done the same for one of my requirements.. but it was not specific for only PO.
Regards,
PR.

FTP speed limit

Hi there,
Trying to figure out why my upload speed is so slow using FTP. I'm working on a 10/10 link full duplex and my speed tests are pretty good overall. My question is why my upload speed using FTP with my browser/explorer is around 150Kbps while the same
file on the same host using FileZilla goes aroung 900Kbps ?! While testing, I disable my AV just to be sure.
Did some research and found a buffer/speed limit on ftp command (ftp.exe /?). Could that be the explanation or am I missing something ?
Thank you

Just to clarify, some questions please:
Are you on a network?
By "Upload", you mean uploading a file over the internet, not within a LAN or WAN, right?
When you say the same file goes 900 kbps using FileZilla, you mean upload, not download, correct?
Also, what kind of internet connection do you have?
One possibility, based on what you've mentioned, is that the server you're uploading to has a maximum speed per connection. This is fairly common. Apps like FileZilla typically use multiple connections to increase download speeds; I haven't used
one in awhile but it's possible they can do this for uploads as well. So if the server you're uploading to has a speed limit of 150 kbps per connection, you'll never be able to get higher speeds unless you use a multithreaded client (like FileZilla).

Will I actually get 10mg speeds ?

I've just signed to migrate to BT and the implied speed during sign up was 10mg, my router stats are as follows -
Connection speed down = 8128
down atten. = 38, noise margin = 6
Connection speed up = 448
Up atten.= 12,noise margin =7.
The IP profile according to BT speed tester is 6500 kbps and the mas possible speed is 7150 kbps.
What speed in reality am I likely to get ?
Thanks,
djh22.

Try this estimator - http://www2.farina1.com/adsl/ , gives you an idea depending on technology used. Site created by one of thinkbroadband guys - http://www.thinkbroadband.com/
Half Man Half Biscuit - Joy Division Oven Gloves - Save 6

I am using an iMac7.1 with 1GB DDR2 SDRAM of speed 667 MHz on board memory. I would like to know what is my best option to upgrade to 4GB on board memory so that I can run Lion OS. Is there a speed limit of the DRAM I can use? Please recommend.

I am using an iMac7.1 with 1GB DDR2 SDRAM of speed 667 MHz on board memory. I would like to know what is my best option to upgrade to 4GB on board memory so that I can run Lion OS. Is there a speed limit of the DRAM use? Please recommend or suggest as soon as possible.

You can install 2 - 200-pin PC2-5300 (667MHz) DDR2 SO-DIMMs. The maximum amount of RAM is 6 GBs. Visit DataMem or OWC to get the proper RAM at reasonable prices.

Need to get the values from "Signed" field from PDF form.

Hi,
This is Dinesh. I am PHP Developer. My issue is "I am not able to get the value of "signed" field from the PDF form when the form has been submitted.". I want to get the Digital Signature value of that field and i need to store it in the DB.
Please help me here Or Please forward this issue to any of the PHP developer who solved this issue and let me know.
Thanks & Regards
Dinesh

Hi Vikas,
you can use this badi MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE, the method will be WHTAX_SPLIT_UPDATE
in this badi please see the importing and exporting parameters, you will get the values of withholding tax code as TE_RBWS in export parameters.
Please search in google or SCN you will get how to use it.

How can I get my App Store sign in to match my newly updated Apple ID?

How can I get my App Store sign in to match my newly updated Apple ID?
The old ID is already grayed in the box for my ID and it does not allow me to type in my new ID.

I appreciate your effort and realize I did not provide a lot of background.
My issue began when I unintentionally managed to add an additional .com onto my new apple ID and the system then incorrectly verified this "none existent" address. Following days of effort and emails to Apple support I finally ended up getting set up with my new ID on iTunes.
The next problem was my App store login continued to have the "old" ID grayed into the signin and since I had changed it to a new ID, I could not login at the App Store.
I spent about 20 minutes on the phone with a total of 3 Apple reps without a resolution to me problem.
The last Apple rep, Chad wanted to be able to take a screen shot of what I was telling him, which made no sense to me but I was willing to do what ever was required to solve the problem. Unfortunately, Chad hung up or somehow disconnected before I received the email required for allowing a screenshot. After calling back and adding another 5+ minutes invested, I decided to attempt to change back to my old ID.
Once I had changed my ID back to the old one, I could download updates and purchases.
I realize my question was asking a lot but my hope was someone would have some idea as to how to correct the problem Apple Support could not. It seems to me Apple needs to make a correction on their end but it is now into week two of attempting to solve the problem and I am pretty much disenchanted with Apple Support due to the amount of time and effort already invested and lack of progress.
Thanks for your suggestion. I think it was a good one considering the lack of other information.
Message was edited by: lb4318

I recently signed up for a one month trial of adobe pro. I logged in. I cannot convert a single page of PDF file to word or Excel with this trial. I just get the request to sign up for a year. What good is the trial if I can't try it?

I recently signed up for a one month trial of adobe pro. I logged in. I cannot convert a single page of PDF file to word or Excel with this trial. I just get the request to sign up for a year. What good is the trial if I can't try it?

Hey vcomfort6,
Please ensure that you are using Adobe Acrobat and not Reader to convert PDF file to word or excel.
Could you tell me whether it is a scanned document? Does this happen with all PDFs or any specific one?
Do you get any error message? What exactly happens when you try doing the same?
Hope to hear from you.
Regards,
Anubha

After 10.8.5 i get a no entry sign on mac mini late 2012

After doing the10.8.5 update from the ap store i get a no entry sign on mac mini late 2012
my macbook pro (2011) went ok and the 3 Mac pro towers i have used have gone ok
a second mac mini did exactly the same from the 10.8.5 combo updater
a save / format and re-install via target disk mode gives me a no entry sign on boot and booting to the recovery partition does the same.

Hi everyone I have fixed it !!!!!!
I had gotten to the stage that the screwdrivers were on the desk and i was ready to remove the hard drive from the mini to lowlevel format it on a "PC" not an easy task on a silver mac mini.
But............
I used carbon copy cloner (trial version so free !!!!) as part of the cloning process in 10.8 it asks you to create a recovery partition on the destination drive.
so I booted in target disk mode whacked ccc on my mac pro and when selecting a clone of the 10.8.5 system from the mac Pro it said the recovery partition on the mac mini hard drive was corupt and re-created it !!
As if it was magicly re-born my mac mini is now operating as if nothing had ever been wrong!
Does anyone know if there is an app for repairing the recovery partition? may need it on the other mac that "died" doing the 10.8.5 combo updater.

TS3988 in syncing my old PC to iCloud, i get: "you can't sign in because of a server error"

When syncing my old PC to iCloud, i get: "you can't sign in because of a server error"? any advice on how to bypass the server error?

I also have the same problem. I've tried all fixes listed in other forums and nothing works. Running windows Vista 32 bit. Any working solutions yet? Tried every solution listed for the cmd prompt. Turned off antivirus and spyware. Rebooting about 100 times. Nothing works.

Can not log in to Creative Cloud. Repeatedly get "You've been signed Out" ... Rebooted, reinstalled, changed password. God, I am reallly starting to hate this.....

Can not log in to Creative Cloud. Repeatedly get "You've been signed Out" ... Rebooted, reinstalled, changed password. God, I am reallly starting to hate this...
[ Private information removed by moderator ]

Sign Out When Sign In http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1450581?tstart=0 may help
-and http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/unable-login-creative-cloud-248.html
And, just in case you ever have this problem...
BLANK Cloud Screen http://forums.adobe.com/message/5484303 may help
-and step by step http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1440508?tstart=0
-and http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/blank-white-screen-ccp.html
Also, this is an open forum, not a direct line to Adobe support... please do not post personal information that may be harvested by a "spam bot"

I'm facing a lot of problem to get connected to 3G speed on my iPhone4 . And also I hardly get 2g speed . I'm done with all the checks as network reset , clearin cache n cookies even . Thus request to clear this heck of a issue

Facing a lot of problem in connecting to 3G speed on my iphone4 . Done with all the checks as network reset and also done with clearing cache n cookies still the problem is same . I hardly get 2g speed even . Thus I request to help to fix this problem.

Your code is absolutely unreadable - even if someone was willing to
help, it's simply impossible. I do give you a few tips, though: If you
understand your code (i.e. if it really is YOUR code), you should be
able to realize that your minimum and maximum never get set (thus they
are both 0) and your exam 3 is set with the wrong value. SEE where
those should get set and figure out why they're not. Chances are you
are doing something to them that makes one 'if' fail or you just
erroneously assign a wrong variable!

Just installed itunes....just get the agreement to sign but it will not open

I just installed itunes on my PC......after the installation process, I get the "agreement" to sign....which I do....but nothing happens after that....???

Refer this article to delete SC files
Win 7/Vista http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2363
WinXP http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1776

Not getting N speed for file transfers?

I am hoping someone out there can help with this.
I have an Extreme base station that I have been using for a while and have had a media player connected to this via an ethernet cable which all worked well. I wanted to get rid of the ethernet cable so I went a bought a 802.11n Airport Express today. After much futzing around I managed to get the Airport Express to connect to the Airport Extreme to extend the network and my media player shows up on the network as it is supposed to.
My settings for the two Airport base stations are as follows;
Airport Extreme
Version 7.3.1
Wireless mode: Create a wireless network
Network name: Apple Network
Wireless Security: WPA2 Personal
Channel: 36 (Automatic)
Wireless Clients: 2
IP Address: 10.1.1.2
Radio Mode: 802.11n only (5Ghz)
Airport Express
Version: 7.3
Wireless mode: Extend a wireless network
Network Name: Apple Network
Airport Express Name: Express
Wireless Security: WPA2 Personal
Channel: 36 (Automatic)
Wireless Clients: 1
IP Address: 10.1.1.4
Under wireless options I have the Express set to use wide channels.
Where my problem lies is that the transfer speeds to the media player are now extremely slow now that i am using wireless. I used to get transfer speeds (wired) via FTP of +2MB/sec (usually 2.3/2.4) and now I am only getting a max of 550KB/sec which quickly drops to around 250KB/sec. If I option click the Airport status on my Macbook it shows a transfer rate of 54.
I can still transfer files from my Macbook to Airport disk at a reasonable speed but the transfer from either the Macbook or Airport disk to the media player is painfully slow.
Hopefully someone can help. Thanks in advance.

So I am still playing around with this and I have downgraded the firmware in my Extreme to 7.2.1 and upgraded the firmware in the express to 7.3.1. I managed to get connected directly to the Extreme somehow and a file transfer (1GB file) via FTP was sitting on 1.2MB/s until it got about halfway through the file and crashed my FTP program and I lost all internet connectivity.
After restarting the Extreme and the Express the internet came back but this time my Macbook was connected to the Express and back to 11g speeds.
Is there a way to force my Macbook to connect to the Extreme and not the Express?
All I really want out of this **** Airport Express is to act as a wireless adaptor for my media player.
Why cant it just give me a connection out of the ethernet port when in "join a wireless network" mode?
/end rant

Getting European Speed Limit Signs in US

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for