Getting support for the dreadful Digital Editions

I checked out a book from my library, & returned it on the expiration date using Adobe Digital Editions (ADE).
Then, because I wasn't done reading it, I checked it out again, (after the expiration period), and attempted to have Adobe reauthorize it.
What happened?  ADE went into a loop for several minutes, flashing a popup so fast I couldn't read it, ultimately telling me I'm not authorized to use the book.
Wait, I just checked it out!
Not wanting to waste too much time on software bugs, I checked out a different book.  This time, when the library due date arrived, I let the book expire without de-authorizing it in ADE.
I did, however, remove the book using ADE's delete book function.  Then, I went to the library.  The library crudware reported I still had the book checked out, and wouldn't let me download it.  Hunting around on my computer, I saw two 6 MB files in Adobe's Digital Editions folder:  they had the same title as the book I had previously used ADE to delete, dated when I ***first*** checked the book out from the library.  Oh, I guess ADE didn't remove the book as it reported.
Okay, I said, "I'll buy the **!@$$ book!"  I went to Google, and I bought the book, which gives me the right to read it on my ereader.  In google, the book opened just fine--I guess Google knows how to write software--and I could sit and read the book on my computer, where I don't want to read it.  Nope, I want to read it on my Sony ereader.  That requires I use ADE.  Bummer! 
So, I clicked the Google button to download the book.  I clicked on the book file as instructed.  Up pops a window from within the dreadful ADE:  "Document is licensed for a different user account."
I went to Adobe's website to report a bug.  They don't seem to take bug reports on this software, or if they do, they hide it well.  Somewhere, I found a forum in which someone with similar problems told one of the 20 or so people who have previously had this problem that they should delete ADE entirely & reinstall.  I tried that.  Result?  Now, ADE doesn't do anything when I click on the book title.
You folks at Adobe call this software?  I call it garbage.  And I know of what I speak, having 20 years of software design experience.
If I don't have access to the book I purchased within a week, I'll also call it a small claims case, and I'll look forward to seeing you in court, where at least if I'm made to waste 3 hours there'll be someone there to respond:  a judge.

In my opinion, I encountered a series of problems that not only look like they were caused by bad ADE software, they were caused by bad ADE software.
I did complain to my library about not being able to check out a book that had been turned in.  They pointed the finger at the provider of their library checkout software, which I had described in my post as crudware, (and I think they also mentioned problems with ADE).  But even when my library wasn't involved, Adobe's Digital Editions didn't work right, unless you call "working right" keeping me from reading on my ereader a purchased copy of an ebook.
After hours of digging, I found the apparent source of the problem:  my password and/or account were different at Adobe and at Sony.  How could "good" ADE software impose such an obscure requirement?
Adobe digital rights management software is supposed to work with numerous vendors and hardware platforms, no?  Requiring the passwords or the accounts be the same at Adobe and at Sony is not good software design, (especially if it's a hidden or undocumented requirement), because it requires users to know the internals of software assumptions.  If that's good software design, then it's good car design to require one to wear a matching shirt and pants before allowing one to start one's car.  Refrigerator won't work? It's because you forgot to put in matching ice cube trays.  Washing machine not running?  It's because you put a pair of mismatched socks in it!  If Adobe requires the Sony (or Barnes & Noble) account/password to match its account/password, it should not allow one to establish an account when that is not the case, or it should report that "error" clearly. 
Bad software requires users to perform "tricks" to get the software to perform its functions correctly.  Tricks are for magicians, not product users. Engineers should think of the "tricks" they can perform--i.e., in the design phase--to make a hardware/software experience pleasant and seamless.  For example, to buy a book in a bookstore, I
   (1) walk up to the cash register and pay for the book with cash or credit card, which authorizes me to read (and/or sell my copy of) the book. 
In my opinion, unless and until Adobe Digital Editions can make the process of ebook buying/authorizing that pleasant and seamless, it has failed its task.  As evidence of the bad ADE software about which I complained, I point to the pages of complaints in this forum, from apparently marooned ebook owners.
How did I ultimately "solve" the problem that didn't allow me to read the book I had purchased?  After spending hours fussing with Adobe's software, attempting to decipher its error messages, attempting to locate its documentation, (why no help pulldown, as in every other piece of Mac OSX software?), and then posting here, I gave up dealing with Adobe.  Not wanting to hassle with the small claims court suit I mentioned in my initial forum post, I contacted Google to have them rescind my purchase, which they did promptly, through a convenient link.  (How I love software that works right!)  I then contacted Sony, which spent another hour or so with me to diagnose and correct the problem, having me change my account information for Adobe and Sony, even though it certainly looked like it was Adobe digital rights management software that wouldn't let me authorize the book to my ereader.  (Thank you Sony!)
After about 7 hours of dealing with this problem, spread over several days, I bought the book again.  In that time, I could have flown across country, bought the book, and read the book on the return flight.  Software that makes tasks harder to perform is not "good" software.

Similar Messages

  • Is there a way to get support for add-ons thru your site...especially since I can't actually contact Firefox?

    I have been trying repeatedly to find out how to get support for the FIREFTP add-on. I have a HDD that is in the midst of crashing and I need to get the ftp accts from it. I have followed every direction they have specified but none work. Need to speak to a developer. Now that I am trying to getting a hold of someone from mozilla, i find the same difficulty getting in touch with someone. This type of support model is a joke.
    I had no idea i would be on my own once a problem occurs.

    The first place to look for a support link for a particular extension is that extension' download page, in the right-column to the right of '''''About this Add-on'''''.
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/fireftp/ <br />
    http://fireftp.net/help.html
    If the extension developer didn't provide that information or doesn't have a support page, the Addons.Mozilla.Org forum is the second place to look. <br />
    https://forums.mozilla.org/addons/
    Third place is the Extension/Theme Releases forum over at MozillaZine. <br />http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=48&sid=74e031d1d4cf5f018a1299f902d76641

  • I was getting support for my Office 2008 for Mac, and the support tech said my OS was very slow. I have latest update for Snow10.6.7. Question how can I speed up my Macbook?

    I was getting support for my Office 2008 for Mac, and the support tech said my OS was very slow. I have latest update for Snow10.6.7. Question; How can I speed up my Macbook?

    Hi
    In the first instance, I'd use Onyx and run through its sequence of maintenance and tune up tools:
    Verify, Maintenance, Cleaning.
    I'd also reset the SMC and PRAM (Google them)
    If that doesn't help then I'd look at System Preferences.. > Accounts > Login Items tab (not Login Options).  Check what processes get started at login and decide which ones you don't want.
    After that I'd use Applications/Utilities/Activity Monitor to see if any processes are using a lot of computer power or if anything else nasty might be happening.
    If none of this helped then my final step would be to reinstall OS X.
    Bob

  • I am trying to get authorisation to use Adobe digital edition, but my book's vendor is not on the li

    I am trying to get authorisation to use Adobe digital edition, but my book's vendor is not on the list, and hence the password not accepted.

    Numbers documents from iOS need Numbers 3.2 on a Mac to open. And Numbers 3.2 requires Mavericks. If you are using Mavericks you can get Numbers 3.2 from the Mac App Store. It will be free IF you have Numbers 2 (iWork '09) installed. Otherwise you must buy it.
    Your other option is to send the Numbers file as an Excel file via e-mail to yourself to open with an earlier version of Numbers.

  • I have my Adobe ID and the Adobe Digital Editions. But when I download an EPUB-ebook, I don´t see the ebook or "My Digital Editions-Bibliothek".What is the solution for this problem?

    @I have my Adobe ID and the Adobe Digital Editions. But when I download an EPUB-ebook, I don´t see the ebook or "My Digital Editions-Bibliothek".What is the solution for this problem?

    how can we solve the problem?
    I have my adob.e ID, downloaded Adobe Digital Editions.
    Whren I download EPUB-ebooks and want to use
    Digital Editions, nothing happens and appears!??
    Please give me a short feedback and help

  • Where do I get my serial number for the free edu edition of dreamweaver

    where do I get my serial number for the free edu edition of dreamweaver?

    I've never heard of Adobe offering a "free educational version" of DW.
    They do offer a free 30 day trial or you can purchase a reduced price education subscription (of the full CC suite of programs) if you qualify.
    https://creative.adobe.com/plans
    Click on the Students and Teachers tab for pricing.

  • I downloaded the Adobe Digital Edition when I try to download my resource books I get this Error "Error: check activation" what could be wrong?

    I downloaded the Adobe Digital Edition when I try to download my resource books I get this Error "Error: check activation" what could be wrong?

    Have you activated Digital Editions with an Adobe ID (or a Vendor ID)?
    Go to the Help menu and select Authorization Information...
    A window will appear to display your authorization information. If your computer is not authorized, you'll need to do that before you can read any DRM-protected books. If you don't have an Adobe ID, you can create one here.

  • Is the Adobe Digital Edition (e-reader from the library) compatible with Adobe Reader X

    I have Adobe Reader X on my computer, and recently downloaded the Adobe Digital Edition so that I can read books from the library. However, when I attempt to download a book, the Adobe Reader X opens, and I get the message....
    XXXX book could not be opened because it is either not a supported file or because the file has been damaged (for example, it was sent as an email attachment and wasn't properly decoded). Any idea what is going on and how I can correct this issue?
    Any responses are appreciated...

    Hi, Char.
    Since your question doesn't relate to our CreatePDF service, I'm moving your question to the Adobe Reader forum.
    Dave

  • A realistic assessment of your experiences of hardware needed for the type of editing I do please.

    Introduction:
    I apologise for the length of this post but from experience of reading here, I'm working on the principle of the more I explain about myself now, the less anyone willing to help me will have to ask later.
    I have lurked around this forum on and off for a few years, read the various threads in the FAQ section, particularly PPBM5 and What PC to build thread and other related topics around what system to build.  I have found them very useful and in particular have enjoyed reading about Harm Millaard's experiences First Ideas for a new system.  For about about 12 months I've been delaying upgrading my PC but in Mr Millard's latest updates on his PPBM6 site he talks about new systems and  provides a link to Intel's time line which suggests they are in no rush to replace the i739xx series CPU chip - which has I believe amongst other things 2 cores disabled.  Normally bitter experience has taught me not to rush out and buy the latest technology but let others "test" it first and then benefit from reduced prices as that model is replaced.  However, it now seems like last years technology is going to remain as this years technology and probably the first 2 quarters at least of next year and, if anything, the price of the i739xx series is at best staying at it's existing launch price or even rising.  So it's time to take the plunge for me and upgrade.
    My current hardware for editing:
    I started with Premier 6.5 after I bought it as part of a bundle with a Matrox RTX 10 card - one of the most temperamental pieces of hardware I've had the misfortune to work with.  I later upgraded to Premiere Pro 1.5 and edited with that using a Pentium 4 2.6 (overclocked to 3.2), 3 hard drives (no raid) and 4G of memory.  The video footage used was avi recorded using a Canon MVX 30i and Panasonic NVGS27 and now I've added the Casio Exilim EX -FC100 (mpeg format) and a Panasonic HDC S90 (AVCHD).
    My PC coped with the editing I did with avi footage but couldn't handle AVCHD format and this convinced me to upgrade to Premiere Pro CS5.5.  At the same time I switched to editing on a Dell XPS M1530 (Centrino duo chip) - I upped the memory to 4GB, put Windows 7 64 bit home edition on and replaced the existing hard drive with a faster one.  In addition I use a SATA Quickport duo attached to my laptop via an eSATA card.  However, either the Quickport, eSATA card or XPS is extremely temperamental - I never see two external hard drives, 50% of the time see 1 external drive or none at all - when that happens I edit around it doing things I can with just the one internal drive - but this problem is not my question.
    The type of editing i do:
    I know people usually say around here not to try editing on laptops and believe me, I understand why, but using this setup I have been able to edit lots of videos  - see here for examples of the type of editing I currently do:
    http://www.youtube.com/user/PathfinderPro
    The equipment test videos place the biggest strain on the hardware when editing.  And, to do this editing I have to convert my AVCHD footage in to it's YouTube format before editing and even after I've done that it can be tediously slow to edit and playback even with premiere set to play at 1/4 normal quality.  To convert the AVCHD footage to the YouTube format I edit in has to be done over many nights.
    Now I am not a professional, I typically edit with up to 4 tracks of video with additional tracks for titles and my target audience is YouTube - which is why I can get away without editing in my prefered option of native AVCHD video format.  However, I'm tired of all the waiting, stuttering, and many many days and hours of converting videos into a format I can use so I'm looking to upgrade.  My problem is though I'm uncertain what path to take.  The PPBM results are dominated by overclocked chips, and whilst the motherboard make and model is listed, the hard disks used, graphic card makes and models and memory modules are not.  This is not a criticism of the PPMB tables (big thank you to Bill Gehrke & Harm Millaard for taking the time and effort to pull this much information together) but for me, I am not interested in being in the top 1000 in the world, nor overclocking like mad, and having had horror experiences of using matrox products and compatibility and stability issues with other hardware I'm more interested in compatability and practicality than speed when deciding what to build.  I've also read the threads about marvel controllers, dual and quad channel memory support, the pro's and cons of SSD or standard drives, raid setups, the heat problems with overclocking the newer ivy bridge chips and general build advice etc so I'm not coming here without having done some reading first.
    The type of system I'm thinking of:
    So far based on what I've read here, I've come to the conclusion - but I'm open to suggestion:
    - Chip - regrettably due to the cost and unlikely successor anytime soon - a 39xx (with appropriate cooler) because I want to edit in native AVCHD which seems to require the warrior type chip as opposed to the "economical" build regardless of what my target audience is and this suggests
    - X79 motherboard (which must have an old PCI slot such as the Asus Sabertooth and which has room for the cooler I'm considering).  As I will be carrying over my old terretec DMX 6 fire 24/96 soundcard - all my videos have their audio mastered in Audition using this card - best piece of advice I read was the audience will watch a bad video with good sound editing but not the other way round)
    - 4 hard drives plus additional hard drive for operating system using onboard raid controllers (not sure whether the operating system drive will be WD caviar black or SSD and can't justify cost of external raid controller for either my type of use or number of hard drives being used)
    - Video card - I can now buy a GTX 580 for less than the 670 - so not sure on the card especially based on Harm Millards observations that memory bandwith seems to be as important as CUDA cores
    - Case - I have an Akasa 62 case with room for 5 hard drives - I won't be exceeding that, and if I overclock it will only be by a little so is it really necessary to replace it for a Tower Case - although I would prefer a case with a front connection for esata so I may have to change the case regardless
    - Maximum memory 32G - so is it necessary to upgrade to windows 7 professional?
    - Power source - I'll work out when I've decided on my components.
    Help please:
    For me it's video source/dictated software chosen and hardware/audience(youtube) dictates format edited in.  As I don't intend to change my camcorders format (AVCHD or mpeg) in the next couple of years and I'm not interested in having the "fastest" system around what I'm really interested in learning is:
    what system setups people use now for doing similar editing to me
    what make/models of the component parts in your system work well together
    and if you do have a bottle neck in terms of hardware, where is it and what hardware would you change to  (not a dream model change, just a practical and realistic one)
    I have deliberately not given a budget for the changes I'm intending because budget should not be the deciding factor in determining what I "need" to upgrade to for the "type of editing I do" - especially bearing in mind I've got by so far (admitedly at a tortoise pace) with by todays standards a standard spec laptop.  Basically I don't want a Rolls Royce to go shopping at Wallmart but I'm tired of walking there and carrying everything back by hand!
    Thank you very much for any help / experiences people can share.

    Thank you both for your prompt and helpful replies.
    Mr Millaard, regarding your excellent article Planning and Building an NLE system, I have read it a couple of times now and it was your article which finally convinced me the time was now to upgrade but within it you said for good reason "Initial choice of CPU: i7-39xx with the intention to overclock to 4.6 - 4.8 GHz", hence my uncertainty about the CPU to use.  I have seen a video you posted here  - I think it was based on your cats (which I incidently enjoyed) so working on the editing done there (but not remembering if you mentioned what video format you used) and others who have mentioned many pro's for the i7-39xx I was leaning towards that - but I'm financially relieved at least - if the i3770 will do, although now with the possible recommendation by JEShort01 (sorry not sure of the forum etiquette for use of names) of the 2600K overclocked I'm a little bit back in the position of which is more suitable especially with the update to the i3770 being nearer than i7-39xx.  This still makes me lean towards the i7-39xx.
    Regarding the editing, the match play you can see on the channel is indeed 1 camera basic edits - multiple titles used to provide the score board.  However, the coaching videos use mulitple cameras - 3 to 4 sometimes (another reason for upgrading to CS5.5 for the multi cam editing support) and the equipment testing video can use 3 or 4 tracks layered on top of each other other with each track having opacity settings and multiple motion effects and titles with occasional keying video effects added.  For example this video at approx 2 mins 50 and 5 mins 10 seconds.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1E5T7xo57c&list=PL577F7AB5E31FC5E9&index=13&feature=plpp_v ideo
    Monitor wise I use dual monitor setup.  My laptop screen and I link out to an LG M2394 D for widescreen and I sometimes use an old Neovo F-419 for 3 / 4 editing.  I won't be using more monitors than 2.  If the 580 drops a bit more I'll probably go for that - although I'll have to make sure it's size isn't an issue for the motherboard combo setup.  Interestingly there is a thread shown on the forum home page which discusses the 570 vs the 660ti and the opinion was go with the 660ti which surprised me a bit.
    Windows 7 professional it is then - I should have known that too - apologises for asking a question already asked.
    "Accepted, your correct criticism of the lacking hardware info on the PPBM5 website. That is the overriding reason that for the new site http://ppbm7.com/ we want to use Piriform Speccy .xml results to gather more, more accurate and more detailed hardware info."
    No criticism intended Mr Millaard - more an observation and I really look forward to that evolution with PPBM7.  I'm assuming the .xml results will use pre populated drop down lists people can select their hardware from - that way you can control and ensure consistent entries - downside being the work required by you to populate the lists in the first place and maintain them.
    Thanks again for your help but I'm still unsure a bit about the CPU and video card though.

  • Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version , SQL Server Extended Events , Optimizing Reading from XML column datatype

    Team , Thanks for looking into this  ..
    As a last resort on  optimizing my stored procedure ( Below ) i wanted to create a Selective XML index  ( Normal XML indexes doesn't seem to be improving performance as needed ) but i keep getting this error within my stored proc . Selective XML
    Index feature is not supported for the current database version.. How ever
    EXECUTE sys.sp_db_selective_xml_index; return 1 , stating Selective XML Indexes are enabled on my current database .
    Is there ANY alternative way i can optimize below stored proc ?
    Thanks in advance for your response(s) !
    /****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes] Script Date: 3/11/2015 3:10:42 PM ******/
    SET ANSI_NULLS ON
    GO
    SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
    GO
    -- EXEC [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
    ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
    AS
    BEGIN
    SET NOCOUNT ON --Does'nt have impact ( May be this wont on SQL Server Extended events session's being created on Server(s) , DB's )
    SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
    select getdate() as getdate_0
    DECLARE @XML XML , @Prev_Insertion_time DATETIME
    -- Staging Previous Load time for filtering purpose ( Performance optimize while on insert )
    SET @Prev_Insertion_time = (SELECT MAX(EE_Time_Stamp) FROM dbo.MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log ) -- Perf Optimize
    -- PRINT '1'
    CREATE TABLE #Temp
    EventName VARCHAR(100),
    Time_Stamp_EE DATETIME,
    ObjectName VARCHAR(100),
    ObjectType VARCHAR(100),
    DbName VARCHAR(100),
    ddl_Phase VARCHAR(50),
    ClientAppName VARCHAR(2000),
    ClientHostName VARCHAR(100),
    server_instance_name VARCHAR(100),
    ServerPrincipalName VARCHAR(100),
    nt_username varchar(100),
    SqlText NVARCHAR(MAX)
    CREATE TABLE #XML_Hold
    ID INT NOT NULL IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY , -- PK necessity for Indexing on XML Col
    BufferXml XML
    select getdate() as getdate_01
    INSERT INTO #XML_Hold (BufferXml)
    SELECT
    CAST(target_data AS XML) AS BufferXml -- Buffer Storage from SQL Extended Event(s) , Looks like there is a limitation with xml size ?? Need to re-search .
    FROM sys.dm_xe_session_targets xet
    INNER JOIN sys.dm_xe_sessions xes
    ON xes.address = xet.event_session_address
    WHERE xes.name = 'Capture DDL Schema Changes' --Ryelugu : 03/05/2015 Session being created withing SQL Server Extended Events
    --RETURN
    --SELECT * FROM #XML_Hold
    select getdate() as getdate_1
    -- 03/10/2015 RYelugu : Error while creating XML Index : Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version
    CREATE SELECTIVE XML INDEX SXI_TimeStamp ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml)
    FOR
    PathTimeStamp ='/RingBufferTarget/event/timestamp' AS XQUERY 'node()'
    --RETURN
    --CREATE PRIMARY XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index
    --SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_2
    -- RYelugu 03/10/2015 -Creating secondary XML index doesnt make significant improvement at Query Optimizer , Instead creation takes more time , Only primary should be good here
    --CREATE XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold_values] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index , --There should exists a Primary for a secondary creation
    --USING XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold]
    ---- FOR VALUE
    -- --FOR PROPERTY
    -- FOR PATH
    --SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_3
    --PRINT '2'
    -- RETURN
    SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_3
    INSERT INTO #Temp
    EventName ,
    Time_Stamp_EE ,
    ObjectName ,
    ObjectType,
    DbName ,
    ddl_Phase ,
    ClientAppName ,
    ClientHostName,
    server_instance_name,
    nt_username,
    ServerPrincipalName ,
    SqlText
    SELECT
    p.q.value('@name[1]','varchar(100)') AS eventname,
    p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') AS timestampvalue,
    p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS objectname,
    p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ObjectType,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="database_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS databasename,
    p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ddl_phase,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clientappname,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_hostname"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clienthostname,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_instance_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS server_instance_name,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="nt_username"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS nt_username,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_principal_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS serverprincipalname,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="sql_text"]/value)[1]','Nvarchar(max)') AS sqltext
    FROM #XML_Hold
    CROSS APPLY BufferXml.nodes('/RingBufferTarget/event')p(q)
    WHERE -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Perf Optimize - Filtering the Buffered XML so as not to lookup at previoulsy loaded records into stage table
    p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') >= ISNULL(@Prev_Insertion_time ,p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime'))
    AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') ='Commit' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - Every Event records a begin version and a commit version into Buffer ( XML ) we need the committed version
    AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
    AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
    AND p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'Replication Monitor' --Ryelugu : 03/09/2015 We do not want any records being caprutred by Replication Monitor ??
    SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_4
    -- SELECT * FROM #TEMP
    -- SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #TEMP
    -- SELECT GETDATE()
    -- RETURN
    -- PRINT '3'
    --RETURN
    INSERT INTO [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
    [UserName]
    ,[DbName]
    ,[ObjectName]
    ,[client_app_name]
    ,[ClientHostName]
    ,[ServerName]
    ,[SQL_TEXT]
    ,[EE_Time_Stamp]
    ,[Event_Name]
    SELECT
    CASE WHEN T.nt_username IS NULL OR LEN(T.nt_username) = 0 THEN t.ServerPrincipalName
    ELSE T.nt_username
    END
    ,T.DbName
    ,T.objectname
    ,T.clientappname
    ,t.ClientHostName
    ,T.server_instance_name
    ,T.sqltext
    ,T.Time_Stamp_EE
    ,T.eventname
    FROM
    #TEMP T
    /** -- RYelugu 03/06/2015 - Filters are now being applied directly while retrieving records from BUFFER or on XML
    -- Ryelugu 03/15/2015 - More filters are likely to be added on further testing
    WHERE ddl_Phase ='Commit'
    AND ObjectType <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
    AND ObjectName NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
    AND T.Time_Stamp_EE >= @Prev_Insertion_time --Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Performance Optimize
    AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log] MN
    WHERE MN.[ServerName] = T.server_instance_name -- Ryelugu Server Name needes to be added on to to xml ( Events in session )
    AND MN.[DbName] = T.DbName
    AND MN.[Event_Name] = T.EventName
    AND MN.[ObjectName]= T.ObjectName
    AND MN.[EE_Time_Stamp] = T.Time_Stamp_EE
    AND MN.[SQL_TEXT] =T.SqlText -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 This is a comparision Metric as well , But needs to decide on
    -- Peformance Factor here , Will take advise from Lance if comparision on varchar(max) is a vital idea
    --SELECT GETDATE()
    --PRINT '4'
    --RETURN
    SELECT
    top 100
    [EE_Time_Stamp]
    ,[ServerName]
    ,[DbName]
    ,[Event_Name]
    ,[ObjectName]
    ,[UserName]
    ,[SQL_TEXT]
    ,[client_app_name]
    ,[Created_Date]
    ,[ClientHostName]
    FROM
    [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
    ORDER BY [EE_Time_Stamp] desc
    -- select getdate()
    -- ** DELETE EVENTS after logging into Physical table
    -- NEED TO Identify if this @XML can be updated into physical system table such that previously loaded events are left untoched
    -- SET @XML.modify('delete /event/class/.[@timestamp="2015-03-06T13:01:19.020Z"]')
    -- SELECT @XML
    SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_5
    END
    GO
    Rajkumar Yelugu

    @@Version : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Microsoft SQL Server 2012 - 11.0.5058.0 (X64)
        May 14 2014 18:34:29
        Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
        Developer Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.2 <X64> (Build 9200: ) (Hypervisor)
    (1 row(s) affected)
    Compatibility level is set to 110 .
    One of the limitation states - XML columns with a depth of more than 128 nested nodes
    How do i verify this ? Thanks .
    Rajkumar Yelugu

  • Why no support for the Leica M9 in LR 2.6 RC?

    Hi - bemused that there's no support for the M9 in this release (especially as LR is bundled with the M9).  Even more confusing as the Standard Adobe calibration profile for the M9 that comes with the LR3 Beta is pretty good (beats the embedded profile that comes with the Leica DNGs) - and this can be added to the LR2.5 profile library with a bit of copying and pasting.
    I'd be grateful to hear from Adobe if there's any chance of a good M9 profile making it to the 2.6 final version.  Seems a shame to miss this opportunity.
    Thanks
    Chris Tribble

    Hello Chris,
    thanks for the nice feedback.
    For the moment, I will use LR for the fast preview of all images, 
    cataloging etc., and RawDeveloper for the fine tuning, as often as the 
    image permit it.
    (sorry for my english!)
    Lets hope that we will get through all that without loosing our 
    perfectly nice temper !
    All the best to you,
    Alain
    Le 11 déc. 09 à 09:39, Chris_Tribble a écrit :
    Alain - 1eme - je suis un particulier - aucun fonction chez Adobe.  
    Aussi -
    je m'excuse d'avant pour mon Francais bottant et sans elegance! Je 
    n'ai
    jamais fais des etuded en francais - et aussi mon clavier anglais 
    manquent
    les diacritiques...
    >
    Quelque petit reponses.
    >
    >>>> First I have installed the 2.6 version, that is said to work
    >>>> alongside the 2.5... but of course, it has replaced it. How to
    >>>> reinstall the 2.5 alongside, hase they have the same name ?
    >>>
    >>> C'est pas la peine - 2.6 est meilleur - vous pouvez rester
    >> avec ca...
    >
    >> ok, mais c'est tout de même juste le contraire de ce que
    >> disent sur le site Adobe vos notes d'installation (rien de
    >> très neuf non plus en cette matière, hélas, quant aux infos
    >> approximatives ou manquantes d'Adobe)
    >
    CT: Pas vrais je crois - Version 3 beta peut co-exister - mais 2.6 
    doit
    remplacer 2.5...
    >
    >>>> And then, I have tried to find a M9 profile, read your
    >> posts, do my
    >>>> job, install the beta 3.0, fond the "M9 Digital Camera Adobe
    >>>> Standard.dcp", put a copy of that in any cameraRaw description
    >>>> files... and so what ? In 2.6, I only have the choice between
    >>>> "embeded" (=incorporé in french) and "Adobe standard" when
    >> I select a
    >>>> M9 dng file / but I've more choice when I select a M8 dng
    >> file (ACR
    >>>> 4.4, ACR 3.6, Adobe standard, Adobe standard beta 2,
    >> camera standard,
    >>>> camera standard beta 2).
    >>>> 1. Do I miss something ?
    >>>> 2. what should I do to find and use the M9 specific profile ?
    >>>>
    >>
    >>>> Encore une fois - il n'y a pas de probleme...
    >>> "Adobe Standard" marche tres bien...
    >> moui... si vous le dites... mais il me convient assez mal, et
    >> j'aimerais tout de même comprendre pourquoi je ne peux pas
    >> charger un profil correspondant à mon M9... je ne comprends
    >> pas non plus pourquoi il n'y a pas de profil par optique
    >> développé par Leica... et en Suisse, personne de chez eux ne
    >> peut répondre à ces questions... alors même que LR 2.5 est
    >> livré en bundle avec le m9!
    >
    CT: Alors - Adobe Standard EST le profil developé par Adobe pour le 
    M9 - et
    c'est le meme qu'on trouve dans LR 3 beta.  Selon mon experience c'est
    meilleur que le "embedded profile".  Pas parfait, mais pas mal non 
    plus
    Vous pouvez vous meme telecharger le DNG editor
    (http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/DNG_Profiles).
    >
    >
    >> je suis professionnel, et très loin d'être heureux avec LR...
    >> (ni avec aucun raw developper, pour être franc, ni
    >> captureOne, ni... encore que justement, RawDevelopper a des
    >> qualités intéressantes - à côté de grande faiblesses... mais
    >> c'est encore un autre sujet)
    >>
    >> mais j'ai bien l'intention de m'accrocher, ne serait-ce que
    >> pour la puissance de gestion/catalogage et l'interface de
    >> LR... quoi que je n'ai aucune confiance en son bricolage des
    >> dng -> donc multiplier les backups des fichiers tels que
    >> sortis du m9, etc... on dirait bien que malgré 15 ans
    >> d'expérience, nous en soyons toujours au balbutiements du digital !
    >>
    >> C'est tout de même plus sérieux (du point de vue des
    >> résultats) du côté de Leaf (j'utilise un L75 sur Alpa
    >> 12SWA)... ça ressemble à quelque chose, mais en petit format,
    >> après le m8, le m9 est vraiment encore loin du compte ! Et
    >> leur développeur, bien sûr, ne développe... que leurs
    >> fichiers propriétaires. Lorsque quelqu'un aura décidé dans
    >> quelques années que leur format .mos est dépassé, mon travail
    >> sera tout simplement perdu. Sauf à convertir en catastrophe
    >> quelques dizaines ou centaines de milliers de fichiers ?
    >> Encourageant, n'est-ce pas ?
    >>
    >>> By the way, I also had this blue pixels lines in the 2500iso
    >>>>
    >>>> files... anyway to save back the file without this bug ?
    >>>
    >>> Je ne vois pas cette image .... Peut etre vous pourriez
    >> m'envoyer par
    >>> email? (mailto:mailto:mailto:[email protected])
    >> Je ne l'ai malheureusement pas avec moi, sur mon portable, et
    >> n'y accéderai plus avant quelques jours...
    >>
    >> Leica Suisse (avec qui je suis en relation directe et qui a reçu ce
    >> fichier) vient de m'appeler et ils reconnaissent - enfin - le
    >> problème.
    >> Mais ils ne savent toujours pas si et comment il vont le résoudre.
    >> Rien avant l'année prochaine, quoi qu'il en soit, et ce sera
    >> fixé, selon eux, soit :
    >> - par un nouveau firmware (difficile à croire)
    >> - par un passage de l'appareil entre leur mains, avec modif/
    >> remplacement d'une partie du soft/hardware
    >> - par un échange d'appareil (!!!) si c'est le capteur qui est
    >> en cause (l'un de mes M8.2 avait été échangé de même à leur
    >> frais après 3 mois, pour d'autres problèmes électroniques) Le
    >> problème de ces lignes de pixels bleus sur certaines prises
    >> de vue en haute sensibilité est largement débattu sur les
    >> forums, et Leica vient de comprendre qu'il n'est pas
    >> extérieur au M9, comme ils le disaient il n'y a pas si
    >> longtemps... encore une petite bombe à leur actif !
    >> Dite-moi si ça vous intéresse et je vous les ferai suivre...
    >
    CT: J'avais un tel probleme avec le M8.2 - chez le M9 pour le moment 
    ca
    marche!
    >>
    >> Par ailleurs, ils viennent de me proposer de repasser toutes
    >> mes optiques au banc (codées par leurs soins il y a moins
    >> d'un an) pour les ajuster une nouvelle fois au mieux au m9...
    >> là aussi, ils reconnaissent des failles techniques sérieuses
    >> ! J'ai par exemple un summicron 35 asph parfait sur film et
    >> sur m8, qui est... flou (sur les bords, et irrégulièrement)
    >> sur mon m9 ! Interressant...
    >>
    CT: c'est vrais que les boittier numerique sont plus exigeant - je 
    conseil
    un contact direct avec Leica a Solms.... Et aussi (si vous n'y etes 
    pas
    inscrit deja) que vous faites appelle pour rejoindre le reseau Leica
    Professional.  Ca vaut la peine et augment le vitesse de reparation...
    >
    >>> Je vous conseiller aussi de visiter L-camera forum...
    >>> (http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-m9-forum/
    >>> ) Vous y trouverez des francophones la bas et il y a beaucoup de
    >>> bonnes informations...
    >> je connaissais, mais les questions en français trouvent
    >> rarement de l'écho... et le niveau technique n'est
    >> malheureusement pas très élevé, malgré la gentillesse des
    >> interlocuteurs.
    >>
    >
    Oui!  MAIS j'ai appris des choses la bas ...
    >
    >>> Bon courage!
    >>> Chris
    >>
    >> Il en faut, en effet...
    >> merci en tout cas !
    >> (à propos, quelle est votre fonction chez adobe ? Puis-je
    >> reprendre contact avec vous lors de mes prochaines
    >> découvertes ?) Amitiés, Alain
    >>
    Encore une fois - bon courage..
    >
    Dr Christopher Tribble
    MOBILE     || +44 (0)7917 473522
    EMAIL     || mailto:[email protected]
    WEB     || www.ctribble.co.uk
    >

  • SP1 to R2 Upgrade - The installed Version of SQL Server is not supported for the operational database

    Hello, 
    Am trying to upgrade a SCOM SP1 environment to SCOM R2( 3 MGT servers, 1 GW and 2 Web console boxes )
    The prerequisites are failing and it is stating the following ; 
    Operational Database SQL Version Check - The installed Version of SQL Server is not supported for the operational database
    Data Warehouse  SQL Version Check - The installed Version of SQL Server is not supported for the data warehouse
    The SQL servers are running SQL 2012 SP1 64 Enterprise, which is compatible.
    All other pre-upgrade tasks have been done. 
    Help appreciated! 

    I'm having the exact same issue, I believe. I think that Tubble has problem with SCOM 2012. Not 2007.
    I've checked the compatibility list for both SCOM 2012 SP1 and R2. All newer Windows Server and SQL versions are supported. We're running the SQL 2012 SP1 x64 Standard edition on a Windows Server 2012 Standard.
    I even tried to move the database from SQL 2012 to an older SQL 2008 R2, but that's not supported either. Only upgrading. Not downgrading.
    So, I started checking the opsMgrSetupWizard.log file for clues. And the error message was there as well. But the reason why it says not supported is that it can't get the info about the OS version, so I guess it assumes the OS version is to low. The RPC
    service can not be reached.
    [10:29:11]: Error: :GetRemoteOSVersion(): Threw Exception.Type: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException, Exception Error Code: 0x800706BA, Exception.Message: The RPC server is unavailable. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800706BA)
    [10:29:11]: Error: :StackTrace: at System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ThrowExceptionForHRInternal(Int32 errorCode, IntPtr errorInfo)
    at System.Management.ManagementScope.InitializeGuts(Object o)
    at System.Management.ManagementScope.Initialize()
    at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Initialize()
    at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Get()
    at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.OperationsManager.Setup.Common.SetupValidationHelpers.GetRemoteOSVersion(String remoteComputer)
    [10:29:11]: Debug: :IsSQLOnAValidComputer: remote OS version string was null or empty.
    [10:29:11]: Error: :Error:IsValidSQLVersionCheck: SqlServer OS version is too low.
    [10:29:11]: Debug: :**************************************************
    [10:29:11]: Error: :<![CDATA[CheckPrerequisites: Logic Type:and IsValidOMDBSQLVersionCheck: 2]]>
    [10:29:11]: Error: :
    [10:29:11]: Error: :CheckPrerequisites: OMDBSqlVersionCheckTitle: Failed
    [10:29:11]: Error: :
    [10:29:11]: Debug: :**************************************************
    [10:29:33]: Error: :GetRemoteOSVersion(): Threw Exception.Type: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException, Exception Error Code: 0x800706BA, Exception.Message: The RPC server is unavailable. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800706BA)
    [10:29:33]: Error: :StackTrace: at System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ThrowExceptionForHRInternal(Int32 errorCode, IntPtr errorInfo)
    at System.Management.ManagementScope.InitializeGuts(Object o)
    at System.Management.ManagementScope.Initialize()
    at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Initialize()
    at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Get()
    at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.OperationsManager.Setup.Common.SetupValidationHelpers.GetRemoteOSVersion(String remoteComputer)
    [10:29:33]: Debug: :IsSQLOnAValidComputer: remote OS version string was null or empty.
    [10:29:33]: Error: :Error:IsValidSQLVersionCheck: SqlServer OS version is too low.
    [10:29:33]: Debug: :**************************************************
    So, in our case this was just a FW that was blocking some high ports between management server and SQL. I believe TCP port 135 also needs to be open.
    Let's hope this fixes your issue as well, Tubble.
    Have a great day!

  • [Consolidation-Locked] Please add RAW support for the Nikon D600 to Lightroom as soon as possible!

    My Fair Adobe,
    Please add RAW support for the Nikon D600 to Lightroom as soon as possible!
    ViewNX lets me get to the images, but come on!!! I know Lightroom, and you, ViewNX, are no Lightroom.
    Yes, I see everyone else ASKING for D600 support. I'm here to beg for it! Don't make me wait much longer!
    Message title was edited by: Brett N
    Message title was edited by: Brett N

    Rob, my reading of your site is that this plug-in copies settings from raw to jpeg, does it work the other way around as well?
    Rob Cole wrote:
    One of the great things about the new 0-based defaults and linear tone curve is:
    You can develop the jpegs now, in Lightroom, and then sync the settings to the raws later (e.g. using RawPlusJpeg), and provided you select a matching camera profile, they will look almost the same (white balance won't translate over, but everything else will, more or less). Beware lens corrections applied to the raws might alter the registration of precision local adjustments.
    Note: I recommend shooting with ADL off in order for this to work better, and consider turning sharpening off in camera as well, and noise reduction and everything else to whatever extent is possible.
    Rob

  • Call to Arms for the dreaded U052 Wrong Printhead Error

    This is a "call to arms" for all of you Canon customers who have had this problem and have had their printers disabled because of it.  Please respond with the model of your printer and if you were able to fix it, what you did to fix it.  We need to put pressure on Canon to respond this product defect.  It appears to be bad firmware that does not allow the user to override the problem and to continue to use the printer even in a degraded mode.  From my investigations the problem is NOT a printhead issue - no way one can be printing fine and then have this error alert without having changed the printhead or ink cartridges! Canon, PLEASE take this issue seriously and provide a solution across the affected models.  If nothing else there should be a trade-in allowance for those printers that have been affected by this product defect. I have had many Canon printers because they have superior functional specifications. I want to be able to continue using Canon products but only if I can have confidence that this product defect will not destroy my investment. If Canon is unresponsive our next step should be to aggressively publisize this product defect on social media and on major product vendor outlet sites as negatives reviews. Forum Users, please reply with your affected model number(s) and with details of any succdessful fix procedure.

    This is what I've been able to find so far. 19 posts in 2 of the forums. These represent 36,989 views of the same U052 problem! 16 different models have reported problems:MG5320
    MG5350
    MP520
    MP530
    MP600
    MP610
    MP830
    MP860
    MP960
    MP990
    MP970
    MX700
    MX882
    MX860
    MX870
    MX892 Where is the Canon Product Quality Assurance Department?  This product deficiency should be investigated and a robust solution provided to the thousands of affected Canon loyal customers. What is your response Canon?  Doesn't this warrant a firmware update to correct this product deficiency? Is it time for a class action law suit?
    1- U052 Printhead Problem MX870
    by chdevers in Printer/Multifunction Support
    Stopped printing while in the middle of a big job with full ink tanks, then when turned back on, gave the dreaded U052 print head error message.  I have tried everything given by Canon to re-start...
    Show results in replies (5)
    ‎05-30-2013 06:19 AM
    11 Replies
    3893 Views
    2- my canon mx892 will not print because of error U05...
    by markmarn in Printer/Multifunction Support
    our canon mx892 will not print due to error U052.  i followed all of the suggested steps for this problem related to an MX700 but it did not correct the problem. now what?
    Show results in replies (4)
    ‎08-10-2013 05:48 PM
    4 Replies
    1672 Views
    3- MG5320 U052 Error
    by JimCarey in Printer/Multifunction Support
    I have had the MG5320 printer for just over a year now. Everything has been working brilliantly until recently. I am now getting an error: "U052: The type of printer head is incorrect. Install...
    Show results in replies (2)
    ‎11-01-2013 04:13 PM
    2 Replies
    488 Views
    4- My canon MP600 will not print due to error message...
    by Shelby27 in Printer/Multifunction Support
    Error message - The type of print head is incorrect - install the correct print head. I have not changed the print head - all lights are solid red with the exception of M and C. When you remove them ...
    Show results in replies (1)
    ‎12-30-2013 06:17 PM
    1 Reply
    190 Views
    5- Error code u052 on pixma mg5350, says print head n...
    by Dendou in Printer/Multifunction Support
    ‎09-29-2013 08:15 AM
    571 Views
    6- mp830
    by mags in Printer/Multifunction Support
    I keep receiving an error on the screen of my mp830 that says:  Install the correct print head. This started since I put in new ink in all but one ink well...which is the number 5 one, the biggest on...
        •    Tags:
        •    U052
    Show results in replies (1)
    ‎05-24-2013 05:52 PM
    3 Replies
    1070 Views
    7- MP610 no longer printing color
    by steger in Printer/Multifunction Support
    My MP610 has been working reliably and well for years.   Then... I received a U052 error ("type of print head incorrect"). By removing the print head and cleaning it with hot water, the...
    Show results in replies (1)
    ‎01-28-2014 12:22 PM
    1 Reply
    137 Views
    8- MP830 printhead error message
    by Maryruthmarks in Printer/Multifunction Support
    After I put in a large black cartridge in my MP830 printer, it comes up with a message saying  "The type of printhead is incorrect.  Install the correct print head"   I did nothing differen...
        •    Tags:
        •    U052
    Show results in replies (1)
    ‎02-01-2014 08:10 PM
    1 Reply
    41 Views
    9- MP520 Print Head Problem
    by vf32 in Printer/Multifunction Support
    I  tried to print but got the message, "The type of print head is incorrect. Install the correct print head"
    Show results in replies (2)
    10- Error message on my MX700 Printer: U052 This type ...
    by jdegann in Personal Printers
    I got this after installing new ink - it worked just a bit and then when I turned printer off and on, got this msg.  I took out cartridges and head, put them back in, and no change.
        •    Tags:
        •    choc1970
        •    U052
    Show results in replies (5)
    ‎11-28-2012 09:16 AM
    19 Replies
    20152 Views
    11- Getting U052 (type of printhead incorrect) on my P...
    by Islander in Personal Printers
    I'm getting a U052 error message on my Pixma MP610 printer.  It reads "The type of printhead is incorrect. Install the correct printhead."  I replaced an ink cartridge that was running low...
    Show results in replies (1)
    ‎09-01-2013 12:20 PM
    1 Kudos
    1 Reply
    3703 Views
    12- U052 error message on my Pixma MP610 printer
    by corhoe in Personal Printers
    It reads "The type of printhead is incorrect. Install the correct printhead. Whats the solution?   corhoe
    Show results in replies (2)
    ‎01-25-2014 05:12 AM
    2 Replies
    167 Views
    13- Call to Arms for the dreaded U052 Wrong Printhead ...
    by macnicol in Personal Printers
    This is a "call to arms" for all of you Canon customers who have had this problem and have had their printers disabled because of it.  Please respond with the model of your printer and if y...
        •    Tags:
        •    U052
    Show results in replies (1)
    ‎01-30-2014 10:13 AM
    1 Reply
    83 Views
    14- Canon MX700 error message U052, then 5200
    by SKS1971 in Personal Printers
    Recently, after installing a new black print cartridge, I received the error message U052. I followed the trouble shooting suggestions. After turning printer back on, now I get error message 5200...
    Show results in replies (1)
    ‎02-28-2013 11:52 AM
    1 Reply
    925 Views
    15- Canon MP990 U052 - print head is incorrect
    by jaj in Personal Printers
    I have taken the print head out and placed back into the printer - then replaced all ink cartridges - turned printer off - unplugged printer for 10 minutes then turned back on.  This error message ke...
    Show results in replies (1)
    ‎08-15-2013 04:38 PM
    1 Reply
    463 Views
    16- error message u052 canon mx882- printer worked fin...
    by ddodds in Personal Printers
    Canoon mx882 error message u052 printer and scanner have worked great.  Thought i should do some maintence since in 3 years i had never done it. cleaned roller tested ink heads everything ok   thgen...
        •    Tags:
        •    U052
    Show results in replies (2)
    ‎04-09-2013 09:18 AM
    2 Replies
    1436 Views
    17- how to fix a message from cannon mp530 "check cart...
    by gsecondez in Personal Printers
    hi, i have a cannon mp530 printer.  it stopped printing and a message showed "check cartridge U052". all of the ink cartridge still have ink and none of them are blinking.  can you please...
    Show results in replies (1)
    ‎08-23-2013 11:34 PM
    1 Reply
    800 Views
    18- Any new help on fixing U052 error on MX860?Reinsta...
    by eddytsang in Personal Printers
    I have been using this printer for a while.  No change and it just come out with this error.  Is it time to get a new printer? Try the restall print head method.  no luck. Any other suggestions?   Th...
    ‎01-18-2014 10:27 AM
    99 Views
    19- My MP970 printer won't print.
    by sasa in Personal Printers
     My MP970 printer won't print.  The message says the type of print head is incorrect.  Install the correct print head.  This is the second time in two months this problem arose.  Last time it just st...
    Show results in replies (1)
    ‎07-31-2013 11:02 AM
    2 Replies
    1097 Views

  • ACR 8.7 has been released with support for the Nkon D750.  Why no Lightroom support yet?

    ACR 8.7 has been released with support for the Nkon D750.  Why no Lightroom support yet? Am I wrong or was support for the D810 available far more quickly?

    ACR 8.7 has not yet been released. The ACR 8.7RC has been released. It is a Release Candidate - and as such, is not a final version.  I wouldn't be concerned about a lack of Lightroom support until a final version is released.
    Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 8.7 Release Candidate | digital camera raw file support - Adobe Labs

Maybe you are looking for

  • Aging Report-AR

    Hi gurus, Where can i find the AR aging report of overdue invoice by customer? Thank You, Graham_s.

  • JAR File for Channel-Class for Adapter-Modules

    Hello, does anybody know which JAR and Package i need for the Channel-Class. It's not: com.sap.aii.mapping.lookup.Channel I need this one with the method "getValueAsString" in order to write an Adapter-Module. Gunnar

  • Multiple Routes

    Hi All, Can the route be different for different line items in a sales order? If yes, how is the requested delivery date is getting calculated in this case? Please suggest. Regards, Raghav

  • Problems connecting in new place

    I recently moved to a new place with a new wireless network. My Airport was working great at my old place so I'm thinking I'm just having connection problems. First my computer couldn't "see" the airport so I plugged it into my computer with an ether

  • 2 errors in 10g agent

    Hope somebody can help :-) Have one server with grid control installed 10g. Another server with rdbms 10g and in a seperate dirictory the 10g agent. Both sites are starting up, but in the agent trace file I can see following errors: a) 2004-02-18 14: