GF FX5200-TD128 Memory Bandwidth

What is the Memory Bandwidth of the MSI FX5200-TD128?
and FX5200-T128?
and FX5200-TDR128?

The memory bandwidth is the amount of data that can be transferred from and to the memory in a second. On the FX 5200, the theorical bandwidth is 6.4 GB/s

Similar Messages

  • Msi Fx5700 Td128 Memory Bandwidth

    Hello to all!
    Please tell me the MEMORY BANDWIDTH for this  card:
     MSI GeForce FX5700(non Ultra) TD128
     memory implemented: SAMSUNG
    On website is 14,4GB/s , but in Quick Users Guide 8,8GB/s.
    What No. is the right No.?
    Please answer someone...

    14.4 is the bandwidth for the Ultra so I assume it isn't the same on the non ultra.
    You can calculate it by finding the rated timing of the memory chips and therfore the memory clock (approximatly).
    For instance 2.8ns (should be marked on the chip -28) is 1/2.8ns=357MHz.
    Using DDR it is effectively 714MHz, and using 128bit wide BUS you get 11.4GB/S

  • MSI GeForce FX5700 TD128(non Ultra) MEMORY BANDWIDTH

    Hello to all...
    I have 1 question please. I want to know the real memory bandwidth for MSI
    GeForce FX5700 TD128(memory: Samsung). I found on MSI website this :
    GeForce FX 5700 Graphics Core: 256-bit
    Memory Interface: 128-bit
    Memory Bandwidth: 14.4GB/sec.
    Fill Rate: 1.7 billion pixels/sec.
    Vertices/sec. 356 million
    Memory Data Rate: 550 MHz
    Pixels per Clock (peak): 4
    Textures per Pixel: 16
    RAMDACs 400 MHz
    in MSI FX Series Quick User's Guide i found No. for memory bandwidth 8,8!!! GB/sec(MSI GeForce FX5700 TD128)
    Quick User's Guide Version: 5.0, November 2003, G52-V1NFX07
    Please remail and explain.
    Thanks
    TT

    14.4 is the bandwidth for the Ultra so I assume it isn't the same on the non ultra.
    You can calculate it by finding the rated timing of the memory chips and therfore the memory clock (approximatly).
    For instance 2.8ns (should be marked on the chip -28) is 1/2.8ns=357MHz.
    Using DDR it is effectively 714MHz, and using 128bit wide BUS you get 11.4GB/S

  • Fx5200 Td128

    HI, I just bought a MSI FX5200 TD128 and i´m very disapointed with it. The card has almost the same perfomance of the G4 MX440 64MB. I know that this card is a low budget card, but come on! It costs twice the G4 MX440. It has to be at least 30 or 40% perfomance improvement!
    I have another question too! How can i know if my graphics card memory is 64bit or 128 bit? I heard that only the TDR128 has 128bit DDR memory. Is it true?
    Pentium 4 2.6GHz 800MHz FSB HT enabled
    Motherboard Intel 865PERL
    2X256 RAM DDR400
    MSI FX5200 TD128

    Brunomcr,
    Caveat Emptor.
    Do your research before you buy. If you are looking for a good budget GeForce, go with the GeforceFX 5700 Ultra. It is currently the best bang for the buck.
    Take Care,
    Richard
    P.S. About the 64bit or 128 bit, who cares? It is an FX 5200, 128Bit and a huge overclock will not help that chipset.

  • Mega 180 and MSI FX5200-TD128

    Hi all and thanks in advance for any help.
    I just bought MEGA 180 a some more things, here is my current config:
    Box - Mega 180
    CPU - Barton 2500+
    Memory - 2x256 - 400Mhz from Phoenix Technologies
    Disk - 120 Gigs HD - Seagate Ultraquiet
    DVD Rom - Leadtek Silent
    PVR PCI Card - PVR 350 from Hauppage
    Everything works fine.
    Now I have an MSI FX5200-TD128 Graphics Card and decided to try it out.
    With some difficulty I managed to put it in but now .... the computer simply does not start .. well sort off.  
    Once I hit the power on button three things can happen:
    * Computer starts but the display is not on, and eventually it locks.
    * Computer starts with some gittery on the screen and it locks
    * Computer starts, I hit the del key but I can't even get into the BIOS.
    In either case the OS never boots.
    My question is,
    * Do I need to set something on the BIOS before I install the card such as, increase the AGP voltage or something like that?
    * Can it be that my memory is just BAD for it?
    * Can it be that my AGP slot is just BAD?
    * Do I need to setup the BIOS prior to the operation?
    * Is this just that my MSI card is too power hungry, which I think it strange as it is from MSI, its the latest model of its type?
    Please help me, and again thanks in advance.
    Nuno
    PS: By the way, my BIOS is V3.30 downloaded two days ago from Live Update

    Hi,
    Managed to get it working. Here is what I did in case anyone has the same problem as mine.
    1) Take a memory DIMM out, a let one just stay there. This will get you a memory total of 256 Mgs and your system will now boot.
    2) Get to the BIOS settings.
    3) Choose the option concerning DIMM's and performance (third option I think).
    4) In the third option select Manual. This will allow you to set specific options for the memory.
    5) Select Auto in the option concerning CPU / DIMM transfer rating.
    6) Select High Performance in the 7th or 8th option concerning your DIMM settings.
    7) Save the BIOS
    8) Put the DIMM back in
    9) Start your system and voila it works.
    Best regards,
    Nuno

  • Fx5200,fx5500 mem. bandwidth

    How can i recognise memory bandwidth in FX5200 and FX5500 without any software (with eyes or hands :o) ) ?
    thnx
    RaJo

    Well, I think I've got some answers. It looks like the number of 16 Mb chips in the card is related to its the memory bandwidth. A card with 4 of these 16MB chips is a 64bit card (16 X 4 = 64). These cards are most common. When the card has a group of 8 of these chips, then it is a 128 bit card. Just take a look of the cards to identify its memory bandwidth. Note: some cards have chips on both sides (see the MSI FX5200 T128 image for an example).

  • Memory Bandwidth 865PE Neo2 FIS2R & MAT

    I read with envy the msi web page describing MAT on the 865PE board, http://www.msi.com.tw/html/service/techexpress/tech_column/6728/page5.htm
    It has two graphs showing SiSoftware Sandra memory benchmarks.  
    I have a similar configuration as the test bed but I can not achieve more than 3,561MB/s with default BIOS settings ie no MAT or DOC and using spd on alledgedly the fastest PC3200 memory money can buy the Corsair Twinx PC3200LL.
    I am using dual channel with matched set of memory boards.  
    What gives? I note that the test bed uses PC3500 memory but if the clock rate is the same (400Mhz) no appreciable difference should be shown (bar low latency settings mine 2-3-3-6).
    Any ideas on how to get the bandwidth up on this board?   Or do I have a problem?

    Quote
    Originally posted by Neo 2
    My memory is running in the 9000\'s. I\'m confused how is mine so high and you guys so low?
    Care to post a screenshot? I think that 9,000 is not possible. People in the Asus boards are scoring in the 6,000+ ranges and they are overclocked like crazy.
    http://www.asusboards.com/forums/showindex.php?s=79160be2a73b129346e560436a011d5a&threadid=40698&perpage=15&pagenumber=1
    Are you sure it's the Memory Bandwidth that you selected? I remember from another thread your version of Sisoft Sandra does not have the PAT option displayed. Download the latest Sandra:
    http://www.sisoftware.net/index.html?dir=dload&location=sware_dl_x86&langx=en&a=

  • Is nVidia Geforce GT640 good graphics card for PrE10 despite low memory bandwidth?

    Can anybody confirm that the nVidia Geforce GT640 is a reasonable graphics card for Premiere Elements 10 and Photoshop Elements 10?
    The person who assembled my Core i7 3770K desktop with 16Gb of RAM at 1600mHz installed the nVidia GT640 card with 2Gb of DDR3 memory. He said that this was a good (fairly low cost) card for video editing because it has 384 CUDA cores - very helpful in video editing. I am pretty ignorant about graphics cards, but like the low power usage, 65 watts, and reputed cool operating temperatures. I have since read that DDR5 memory would have been much faster because of greater memory bandwidth - say 80-90Gb per second compared with 28.5Gb per second for the DDR3 memory on the GT640 card. I was after economical power use. DDR5 cards use 110 watts upwards and run much hotter than DDR 3 cards, all other things being equal. The really fast cards require special power units and cooling.
    Does anybody know whether limited memory bandwidth is important in video editing? Is speed much more critical in gaming than in video editing? Are other attributes such as 384 CUDA cores, nvenc syncing, dedicated encodment, 28nm Kepler architecture, 2Gb memory frame buffer, 1.3 billion transistors, plenty of texture units -  more important than memory bandwidth in video editing? Does bandwidth limited by DDR3 memory affect quality of image?
    I read that the GT640 would be much faster (producing better image quality?) than the HD4000 integrated Intel graphics of the Core i7 Ivy Bridge processor. Is this so?
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit and all programs are installed on a 120Gb OCZ Agility 3 solid state drive. My data drive is a 1Tb Seagate SATA 3 at 7200 RPM. I have a beautiful 21 inch ASUS vs228n LED monitor and LG blu-ray burner.
    I did lots of editing with PrE 3 with a Dell 3.06 gHz hyperthreading desktop and Win XP. The output and even the preview monitoring was clear and stable. I am still capturing standard definition mini dv tape by firewire from a 3MOS Panasonic handycam, but plan to upgrade to HD 3MOS with flash memory. I make the preview monitor really small - about 7cm wide - in PR10, because the quality of the preview picture is much poorer than the quality that I experienced with the Premiere Elements 3 program with Win XP. Is this just an indication of memory-saving in PrE 10 previews? I expect output to be much superior, although still mpeg2-DVD quality until I upgrade my camera. I have set rendering on maximum bitrate.
    Anyway, despite these reservations with preview quality, the GT640 seems to be performing fine. Picture quality in Photoshop, online and elsewhere on my computer is excellent.
    I updated the nVidia display driver only yesterday to version 306.23.
    Nearly all graphics cards forums are about gaming. I hope to see more forums about graphics in editing here.
    What do you think of the 2Gb nVidia GT640 for editing with PrE 10 and Photoshop Elements 10? What would you say about picture quality in the PrE 10 monitor versus quality of output? Was picture quality in the PrE 3 monitor sharper and more stable, as I imagine?
    Regards, Phil

    Sheltie,
    Thank you for the kind words. We all work very hard to help others with video-editing. Some of us also show up on other Adobe forums, depending on the products that we use most often.
    Besides helping out, I also find that I learn something new every day, even about programs that I have used for decades. Heck, I just learned something new about PrE vs PrPro (my main NLE program), when I went to try and help a user. I probably actually use PrE more to test my theories, or to replicate a user's problem, than I do to actually edit my videos. Still, when applicable, I do real work in the program.
    With about a dozen "regulars" here, if one of us is not around, several more usually are. Personally, I do not understand how Steve Grisetti and John T. can dedicate so very much time here. Steve is a noted author of books on PrE, PSE, Sony DVD Architect, and others, plus helps run a video/photography Web site, Muvipix.com, that is very active, and has so very much to offer. John T. is always under the watchful eye of The JobJarQueen, and gets dragged, kicking and screaming, out into the yard, or up on his roof, so can be gone for a bit.
    Neale usually beats us all, since he's in the UK, and normally answers all the questions, that come in too late for us to see. He is also a PrE power-user, so beats me hands down.
    I travel a great deal, but no one ever misses me. Was supposed to do a trip to Sydney last Dec., but had to cancel. Have not gotten details on the reschedule of that trip, but it would have been my first jaunt south of the Equator. Gotta' make that happen.
    Good luck, and happy editing,
    Hunt

  • FX5200-TD128 Crashing System

    Straight to the point, then...
    I built a system for a client approx 2 months ago and since that time, intermittently, the system will freeze, screen will go blank, then restart, Scandisk, "Error Report" window.  Configuration is as follows...
    P4 2.8 GHz CPU
    MSI 6728 NEO2-LS MBB
    512 MB Kinston KVR400 DDR RAM
    MSI FX5200-TD128 Video w/ 53.03 Drivers
    Western Digital 80 GB HDD
    LiteOn 52x32x52 CD-RW
    SB Live! 5.1 Sound
    Raidmax Scorpion Case with 420W Power Supply (other PSU specs - now posted later in thread)
    2x case fans
    Logitech Webcam
    Windows XP Home SP1(upgraded from ME - FAT32)
    Customer sent the error report and received a reply back that it was possibly video driver related, so last night we downloaded and installed the latest drivers from nVidia, but problem persists.  It doesn't seem to happen with any particular program or game... sometimes with Counterstrike, other times with Internet Explorer
    My next thought is to try converting to NTFS.  My thinking is that maybe the problem is somehow related to the fact that it was a Windows ME upgrade and not a clean XP install.
    Any help from the experts would be appreciated.
    Rick

    Computermechanic…….
    We knew…. sooner or later that someone would try telling us that there
    420 watt PSU was adequate, but in reality was inadequate. We hope this
    explanation will help you to discover why your PSU is so underpowered
    and or inadequate!
    You said your PSU is rated @ 420 watts @ 100%, correct!
    Here are the specs you gave, correct!
    3.3v x 26A = 85.8 Watts @ 100%  
    5v x 32A  = 160 Watts @ 100%
    12v x 13A = 156 Watts @ 100%                  
    We come up with 401.8 Watts Total @100%, not 420 Watts !…
    PSU are often very deceiving !   All PSU are Not created equal !
    Even our really old Enermax EG365P-VE 350 Watt PSU has more
    watts than your 420 watt PSU!
    Here are the specs:
    3.3 x 32A = 105.6 Watts @ 100%  
    5v x 32A = 160 Watts @ 100%
    12v x peak 20A = 240 watts @ 100 %
    Total watts = 505 watts, correct!..Wrong!. 505 Watts @ 70% = 353.5 Watts,  
    that’s why it’s called a 350 watt PSU!...  
    Now will take your 401.8 Watts @ 70% = 281.26 Watts, You have a 282
    watt PSU !   Remember again, PSU are not created equal!...
    You said: “your power requirement is only 349 watts” looks like you’re a bit
    weak on those precious watts, like 67 of them! Ya think!  Welcome to the
    real world !....
    PSU… are Not designed to run efficiently @ 100% !…  
    PSU.. are designed to run efficiently @ 30% to70% with 50% being optimal!..
    You said: “13A on the 12v rail gives 156 max watts, more than twice the required
    75 needed for an FX card”. The FX card is not the only component that requires
    12volts, some of the amps, and lets not forget, which equals those precious watts,
    you also have to consider the HD, CDRW, SoundBlaster Live 5.1, 2 case fans,
    floppy drive, MB, CPU fan, PSU fans, NB fan, etc, etc. All these components
    could easily used over 100 watts, Maybe more! Maybe less ! Plus the 75 watt
    FX card, to easily total more than 175 watts! Maybe more!  Maybe less !
    So, if you take the 156 watts from the 12v rail and its running @ 30% you get
    46.8 W, now if you take that 156 watts @ 70% you get 109 W, but now, taking
    that 156 watts running @ the optimal 50% you only get 78Watts!..Understand!
    Everyone here, at our Overclockers club, can’t even believe that your rig would
    boot up and go into Windows, for one minute or two or three or four or five or
    six or even seven!.. Without crashing, lockups or BSOD.
    Most signs and symptoms of a faulty or inadequate PSU, are often or random
    reboots, BSOD, lockups, poor performance, crashing, etc, etc.
    If you’re a system builder, or even if your not, we suggest that you and your
    techs at your supply co., read this post written by clarkkent57 on “Choosing
    The Right Power Supply” [https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?threadid=31880]
    and hopefully you and your staff will understand, what we are trying to say,
    your PSU is the issue here! “Its inadequate”!!!!!!
    The H2O Guru
    If You Build The Circuit, The Electrons Will Come!
    Enermax  550 v1.2 EG651P-VE PSU
    +3.3V=36A / +5V=36A / +12V=36A
    +5V & +3.3v = 200Watts
    nVidia MB Drivers v3.13
    nVidia VGA Drivers v53.03

  • Found something very strange about Memory Bandwidth

    Okay ever since I posted my 3.2Ghz overclock thread i've been doing some testing...
    rolling back to 3Ghz from 3,2Ghz gives me 100% stability with prime95, which isn't that weird, BUT!
    When I boot with a FSB of 250 (3Ghz) DDR400 (200Mhz) (4:5 divider) in the BIOS and run a memory bandwidth test in SiSoft Sandra I get a memory score of
    ~4800Mb/s
    Which isn't that strange... A good score..
    When I boot with a FSB of 267 (3,2Ghz) DDR427 (213,5Mhz) (4:5 divider) in the BIOS and run a memory bandwidth test in SiSoftware Sandra I get a memory score os
    ~5150Mb/s
    Which isn't eithat that strange, a resonable gain considering the few extra Mhz I pumped out of the DDR (running at 2,5-3-3-6).
    But here comes the really really strange part...
    I boot with a FSB of 267 (3,2Ghz) into windows..
    I change the FSB to 250 (3Ghz) with CoreCenter or ClockGen..
    DDR goes back to 200Mhz (DDR400) (this all confirmed with Z-CPU)
    I run a memory Bandwidth test in SiSoftware Sandra (restarted the program, not just running another one on top) and I get a memory score of...
    ....~5150Mb/s
    I get similar scores running other benchmarks (in this case Aquamark3) that would suggest that there is a much greater performance loss in setting the BIOS FSB to 250Mhz rather than setting it to 367Mhz then lowering it in windows.
    Does anyone have any idea why this happends?
    I am really interested in peoples theories
    Neo2-LS 1.8
    P4 2,4C @ 3Ghz | 1Ghz FSB
    2x256M Dual DDR400 @ 2,5-3-3-6-8 200Mhz
    Radeon 9500PRO
    Antec TruePower 430W

    the 367 in the end is a typo, ment to say 267... ~1050Mhz FSB - 3,2Ghz for a 2,4C
    Quote
    Originally posted by goalie20
    Maybe I'm not reading your post carefully enough-(its been along day)but on the final configuaration what are your memory timings? Also did you mean to say setting timings to 267 as opposed to 367?
    My DDR timings are listed at the end of my post.. The same timings are used when i'm running at 3Ghz and 3,2Ghz. 2.5-3-3-6
    At 3Ghz with a DDR Speed of 333 I get 400Mhz (200Mhz per module) running FSB 250 (from 200)
    Quote
    Originally posted by REILLY875
    I am confused to... When you say 367MHZ do you mean memory speed at a 5:4 ratio?..Sean REILLY875
    Yes i'm running at a 5:4 ratio.. 367 is a typo, I ment to say 267 and I ment the FSB not the memory..
    Quote
    Originally posted by NovJoe
    What is your DRAM speed set as in BIOS?
    What does your DDR Clock in BIOS shows?
    Check with CPUZ and see what Freq x 2 is your RAM running at?
    The DRAM Speed is left at 4:5 (333) and the speed is 427Mhz when booting to 3,2Ghz (FSB 267)
    The DRAM Speed is left at 4:5 (333) and the speed is 400Mhz when booting to 3Ghz (FSB 250)
    READ THIS CAREFULLY
    Okay, to put this simply...
    Overclock in BIOS to 3Ghz with a DDR Ratio of 5:4
    BIOS FSB: 250
    BIOS DDR: 400
    Sandra Memory Bandwidth Benchmark Score: ~4800Mb/s
    Overclock in BIOS to 3,2Ghz with a DDR Ratio of 5:4
    BIOS FSB: 267
    BIOS DDR: 427
    CPU Speed: 3,2Ghz
    Sandra Memory Bandwidth Benchmark Score: ~5150Mb/s
    So far nothing strange, okay?
    -This is where it gets tricky...-
    Overclock in BIOS to 3,2Ghz with a DDR Ratio of 5:4
    BIOS FSB: 267
    BIOS DDR: 427
    CPU Speed: 3,2Ghz
    In Windows I change the FSB back to 250.
    FSB: 250
    DDR: 400
    CPU Speed: 3Ghz
    Sandra Memory Bandwidth Benchmark Score: ~5150Mb/s
    To cut this short...
    I get more memory bandwidth when booting to 3,2Ghz than 3Ghz even though when i'm in windows I change back to 3Ghz from 3,2Ghz.¨
    Any more questions? =)
    This is really easy if you just read it all closely and if I don't make any more typos :D

  • FX5200-TD128 Video Card

    I've just installed a MSI FX5200-TD128 card into my MSI KM2M VIA KM266 motherboard. Everything appeared to install correctly, however when trying to run any 3-D based game I get a some type of failed to initialize video error. (Moto GP and Midnight Club II are some game examples) When going under video settings the AGP mode (1x 2X 4X 8X) is not check and will not let me change the settings. I've completely formated my harddrive and re-installed everything and still the same problem. I am running ME.
    Any Help with suggestions? Could my new card be bad?

    lfbarts,
    Install the following drivers in this order:
    [list=1]
     VIA 4in1 Drivers
    nVidia DetonatorFX Drivers
    Take Care,
    Richard

  • FX5200 td128 Freeze my PC

    I just bought the MSI FX5200 TD128 TVout and can't install it.  After reboot the screen goes black and freeze.  I tried with the driver from the CD and download the update from the homepage.  ver 56.63 and the problem persist.  Anyone can help me?  I just can get restart in safe mode.
    Spec;
    MotherBoard MSI
    RAM 386
    CPU AMD 1.3
    Win Xp Home

    Can you put the specification of your computer more clearly, for example, what sort of motherboard have u got (model number) please.
    If there is internal video card in the motherboard, have you disable it.
    Also, what PSU do you have?
    Try to upgrade the motherboard's bios the the lastest version.

  • Fx5200 TD128 Dual Monitor Gaming

    Hi, i have a GeForce FX5200 TD128 and i have 2 monitors, 1 on the DVI and one on the SVGA slot,
    I would like to know how can i set my monitors to be able to play fullscreen games on both monitors  

    XblackdemonX,
    The GeForceFX 5200 does not have enough horsepower to play a game on one monitor and you want to play on two monitors????
    The game has to support dual monitors if you want to do multiple monitor gaming.
    Take Care,
    Richard
    P.S. There are some flight sims that support dual monitors.

  • Is FX5200-TD128 (MS-8911) passively cooled?

    I just want to make sure but is the FX5200-TD128 (MS-8911)
    passively cooled as shown in the picture on the MSI website?
    Also does this card have an DVI port which
    can support a resolution of 1920 x 1200 (like my current Creative
    ti 4200) ?
    Perforamce is not too much of an issue since I only want the
    card for 2D but I need an DVI port for my Apple 23" LCD.

    Quote
    Dual, 400MHz RAMDACs for display resolutions up to and including  2048x1536@85Hz
    That's what it says on the product page and the 8911 appears to be passively cooled.

  • FX5200-TD128 with AGP 1x/2x BX chipset mobo

    hi,
    I really need to know this, I'am at customer he wants me to install the VGA card to him MB. He bought to the MSI FX5200-TD128 card to him ABIT BX133-RAID motherboard. This MB supports only 1x/2x AGP... I don't know, this VGA card is backward compatible with this AGP in this MB? In the sysrequiements they don't write anything about AGP port. In other MSI card, MX440 is specified in the syserquiments the min. AGP port must be 4x..... At FX5200 this is missing.
    Can I put this card to this MB? I don't want fry it...
    please help!
    Thank tou

    It *should* work, but these cards usually get very hot in 3.3v slots so if this a passively cooled card you might want to put a fan over the heatsink.

Maybe you are looking for