GID assignation rules in Mac OS X 10.7

Hi guys,
I'd like to know what rules/policy the OS follow to assign a certain GID to the Groups.
I'd like to know if there is a possibility to have a "safe" range of GID when I create my personal groups using the Terminal.
thx!

The predefined groups are numbered 100 or below and 200 through 228. In addition, groups numbered 501 or above may be associated with existing user accounts on the machine; these are generally sequentially assigned.
(63940)

Similar Messages

Team members access thru Assignment rule

When defining the Assignment Rule for Account f.e. the administrator can define the Team Members to be assigned to the account, and their access levels.
My doubts refers to this level of access x the level of access defined thru the user role/access profile. In other words... if thru the Access Profile the user X has a Read-Only access to Account object... and if thru the Assignment Rule - Team Members I give the user X the access Full...
Should I understand that for every other account (except the ones assigned thru assignment) the user X has a Read Only access...and for these accounts assigned thru Assignment the user X has the Full access ?
Txs. for any hints.
Antonio

Antonio, your understanding is correct.

I used to have iPod shuffle connect to PC, I now want to use it on my Mac - how can I now assign iPod to Mac

I used to have iPod shuffle connected to a PC, I now want to use it on my Mac - I cannot get iTunes to see the shuffle at all - trid the 5 sec fix - no go. How can I now assign iPod to Mac?

You can do a platform swap
Order product | Platform, language swap

Problem with lead assignment rule

Hi,
I defined a new lead assignment rule group for my company. I defined two assignment rules according to the billing country value. I work on a demo version of Siebel on demand. The rule is active.
If the value is USA the owner is employee A, if the value is France the owner is employee B, if not employee C.
I tried to create manualy or by import new leads. The assignement rule doesn't work. Can you explain me why?

Hi !
If you want to have assignment rules working, you must check the box "Reassign owner" when you create a new record. When you perform a modification, if you check this box, the assignment rule will be lacunched again. After creating your record, wait for some seconds and refresh the page, you'll see the last modified by field filled with "OnDemand System" or something like that...
Hope this will help, feel free to ask more !
Max

Opportunity Team Assignment Rule and Automated Task Owner

Hi,
We have a requirement that when an Opportunity is created, the Opportunity Team assigned will be based on the Owner of the record. We created a "test" assignment rule wherein the:
* Team Assignment: (Example) John Locke (Manager), Jack Shephard (Coordinator)
* Rule criteria: Opportunity Owner First Name = Sawyer, Opportunity Owner Last Name = Ford (Question 1: I can't find Owner id field from the list... that would have been better..)
This works when the Reassign Opportunity checkbox is ticked during record creation and I needed to refresh the record to see the added users in the Team. (Question 2: Is that how it really works? Also, the users added in the Team does not have an Opportunity Role assigned... This field is important to my requirement..)
We have 3 Opportunity Team Opportunity Roles: Manager, Coordinator, Sales Rep. We also have a Sales Process based on the Opportunity Type wherein each Sales Stage has automated tasks for it. We assigned the "Opportunity Team Role - Coordinator" as the Owner of the tasks.
This part does not work because when you create the opportunity record, the user in the Team is only the Owner (creator of the record = Sawyer Ford)m which is also assigned as the Owner of the Activities created based on Sales Stage. What should happen is that the Owner of the Activities should be "Jack Shephard" (Coordinator from the assignment rule).
Question 3: How can I assign Opportunity Team Role in the assignment rules?
Question 4: It seems like the Sales Stage fires first (which creates the automated tasks) before the assignment rule fires....
Help please...
Thanks in advance,
Jasmin

Hi Abhijit,
Indeed as you stated, the team assignment can only be self-assigned. Meaning that a manager cannot assign a team assignment to another member. Customizing this feature could be quite complex and time/money consuming. If you decide to go that way, then it
is out of my knowledge.
Using the "reassign task" feature will not help because once reassigned, the manager will not be able to change the assignment again for another resource.
I'd rather suggest to put in place a process together with the project manager who is actually managing assignments in the project with Project Pro. For example the manager can access the project plan and should only update his resources on assignments but
not the project itself.
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, P-Seller |

Is it possible to filter Account Assignment rule by Account Creators Role?

Hi,
We have enabled Account Assignment rule but would like to know how we can filter the rule to fire only when the Account Creator's role is not equal to "Account Manager"
Is this possible?
jang
Edited by: jang on Aug 25, 2010 9:59 AM

hi Subbu,
thanks for replying but that does not fit our requirement.
our account assignment's Unassigned Owner is our CRM Admin Clerk and that works.
the rules are set per region + country + state. we have about 15 rules.
so if an admin or intern creates an account, the account assignment works fine.
but if a user with account manager role(we have 10 of them), creates an account, we dont want the owner to be replaced.
eg.
Rule UK => if Country is UK, assign to ROB.
Rule US => if Country is US, assign to JOE.
Jasmine(INTERN role) creates an Account with Country US. Account assignment runs and it properly goes to JOE.
JOE(Account Manager role) creates an Account with Country UK. Account assignment runs and it gets assigned to ROB. => This is the one we want to fix. Since JOE is an account manager, it is assumed he created the account because he should be the owner and therefore should not go to ROB.
Somehow, there is no way to filter based on who created the account.

Extract Assignment Rules

Hi All,
Is it possible to extract Assignment Rules of Account / Opportunity via code or Migration Tool ?
I was looking for a way to extract the Rules, Rule Criteria and Team Assignment into XML file.
Thanks!

CMP, yes you would need to default this field to Y or add workflow to set it to Y. I would recommend that you do not use "Groups" and consider using Book of Business or Teams instead.

What are Task assignment adapter and Task Assignment Rule?

What are Task assignment adapter and Task Assignment Rule?

Task assignment adapter lets you return a value to the type and assignee values in the adapter. You can use these to dynamically assigned to users or groups.
Task assignment rules let you specific the priority in which the assignment rules are done. If you go to any process task adapter and open it. Go to the assignemnt tab. Here is where you can specifiy your rules to create an order of determination. You can have multiple entries with rules determining organization and then have them assigned to appropriate groups in each assignemt rule entry. Or you can dynamically assign by using the default and a task assignment adapter to figure that out.
-Kevin

Assignment Rule to bring parent integer data to child

I am trying to bring data from an integer field in a parent record to the same field in its child through an assignment rule in SAP MDM Data Manager. After running the rule, I get the dialog box notifying me that the assignment rule was successful ("There were no assignment errors"), however, the number does not come through.
I thought the issue was with the parent field going to the field of the same name in its child, so I tried a different integer field, and this did not work either - same result as before.
I tried changing the target field to a text field. The number that was supposed to come over was 14, but the result in the text field was "1:14;".
Is the problem arising because there exists the possibility of multiple relationships? Is there a way to bring over only the actual number, so that this data may go to a sortable field? Please advise.

Hi Rachel,
you are right, there is a possibility of multiple relationships. That's why your result is 1:14;. It could also be something like 2:14,15;.
If you are sure that there is only one relationship, you may want to try to simple take away the unnecessary information using something like
MID(<field>,2,LEN(<field>)-1)
You should then get only the number, which would possibly fit into an integer field.
Hope that helps.
Best regards
Christian

Siebel Assignment Manager: Multiple Assignment Rules

Hi All,
We have a requirement where in we have multiple assignment rules for a single assignment object.
Each Rule has only one candidate. When mutiple rule satisfy, it will assign the highest scoring candidate along with other candidates, keeping the highest scoring candidate as Primary.
We only want to keep the Highest Scoring Assignee on the assignment. Anyone knows if this is possible without customization ?
Regards,
Prasad Sawant.

Hi Yossi,
yes this is possible.
Although I have not done it myself I know that it will work. You should find all necessary steps in Bookshelf "Assignment Manager Administration Guide" Chapter 10.
You can read it here:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B31104_02/books/AssignMgrAdm/AssignMgrAdm_AdvancedConfig.html
Benjamin
Edited by: Penky on Apr 29, 2010 12:43 AM
Edited by: Penky on Apr 29, 2010 12:43 AM

What are the important assignment rules that apply?

Hi,
What are the important assignment rules that apply?
Thanx..

hi,
can you please explain, what do you mean by " imp assignment rules ".
regards
sadhu kishore

When is/are the Assignment Rules triggered ?

Documentation mention that assignment rules are run when the reassign flag is flagged.
Pls. when are the assignment rules triggered other than that... I mean: a) During Opportunity import f.example ? b) When a new Opportunity is created ?
Txs. for any help.
Antonio

Hi Bob,
Txs. for your help.
In the import case, I suppose that I should have the re-assing flag as part of the import data... Pls. is that correct ?
Antonio

Lead Assignment Rules?

We created an assignment rule group yesterday. The assignments are as follows:
If Rejected -> Assign to EMP-C
If Billing City "Contains Exact Value" (List of Cities); and Lead Rating "Contains Exact Value" A; and Billing State "Contains Exact Value" (valid state postal abbr.) -> assign to EMP-A;
If Lead Rating "Contains Exact Value" B,C -> assign to EMP-B
Unassigned Lead Owner -> EMP-C
This was created yesterday, and the reassignment is occuring, but every case gets assigned to EMP-B. The order is as above for the 3 rules. Any ideas?
Message was edited by:
user635035

After making any changes to your rules you need to wait until the next day to test. I recommend taking a single lead and edit it by checking the reassign checkbox thru the UI. I would also recommend simplifying your second rule (EMP-B) to check only on Lead Rating "Contains exact Value" A and see if that works.

Workflows / Assignment Rules and Offline Version of On Demand

Hi
We are planning to use Offline On Demand for Fields Sales. We have created workflow and assignment rules based on opportunity fields. When field user syncs back with Online version, will this workflow and assignment rules get triggered and available in the offline version during next download.
Sundar Raghavan

Sundar, since the On Demand offline only uploads changes (either new or modified records) the online version will treat these changes as new or modified records and workflow and assignment rules should act on these records as if the changes were made in the UI. The next download should reflect these changes.

Assignment rules slow to become effective

I'm seeing a significant delay from the time I revise an assignment rule to when it actually becomes effective. Why the delay? The documentation contains the following:
CAUTION: When you mark a rule group active, the rule group that was marked active the
last time that the rules were released continues to be active until the rules are released
again. When the rules are next released, the rule group that was most recently marked
active becomes active. When you mark a rule group active, do not delete the previously
active rule group until after the rules have been released.
So, how do you indicate the old rule is to be released? I've tried making the rule non-active and then making it active. It doesn't have any impact.
Regards,
Jeff

Jeff, when make changes to your assignment rules either adding a new rule or modifying a existing rule you to wait until the next day (need to go thru midnight) to test those rules.

GID assignation rules in Mac OS X 10.7

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for