GL A/C for movement type 309

How to find GL account (tcode..) for movement type 309

The way to check the G/L accounts getting hit is to check the material document's FI document. To look for this document, use TCode MB51 with search selection as movement type 309 and execute, it will bring up all material documents created with this movement, double click on any material document No. will take you to display material document, there in header under DOC INFO tab, you will see FI document button click on that, and you can see the G/Ls and the accounting entry getting generated for the said movement.
Sometimes you will not see any FI document generated for movement 309. The reason is when doing variant adjustment of same price, no accounting document is generated as the prices are same. If the prices are different accounting document is generated.
Edited by: Afshad Irani on Apr 14, 2010 5:16 PM

Similar Messages

  • GL account for movement type 309

    How to find GL account for movement type 309. Tcode etc
    Stop Cross-Posting

    Hi,
    Try using transaction code OMWB (press cancel on pop-up) >
    Press "Simulation" button and enter plant + mat + movement type >
    Press "Account assignments" button
    Dr/Cr G/L accounts displayed for posting lines.
    Kind regards,
    Robert

  • Change the behavior for movement type 309 - Account post PRD

    Dear friends ,
    We need to transfer material to material using movement type 309.
    These material are using price control "S".
    When we transfer from material A to material B the price difference stay stopped in the PRD account.
    We need to revaluate the material B automatically and not let the price difference stopped in the PRD... when we run the Material Costs..via Material ledger.
    Does anyone knows a way to change this behavior ?
    best regards,
    Alessandro

    Dear Revi thanks for your answer !
    One more thing...
    We cannot change the valuation from S to V in the material B.
    Regarding the PRD postings... when the Controlling team runs the Material Ledger the price for material B should be changed/updated automatically, Am I right ?
    And then the PRD account must be cleared...
    Or I continue to do the MR22 manuall...or better... create an Abap program to run automatically clearing the PRD posting agains't the material via MR22 to correct the cost of this material.
    thanks once more.
    Ale

  • Accounting doc g for Movement type  309

    I have created a new movement type, copy of 309. and assigned G/L account.
    Still I am unable to see accounting Doc for the same
    Pl help me its Urgent

    It depends what you are doing with this movement type.
    309 is a multi-purpose movement type, you can jsut use it to move materials from one location to another like 311, then no accounting document is created.
    But you can as well move material to material, then you should get accounting docs, but.......if the materials are nonvaluated materials, then you dont get an accounting document.
    Tell more details And we will see how we can help you.

  • Cost Center required for Mvt Type 309

    Hi,
    In the standard configuration of Mvt Type 309 without special stock indicator, is the cost center field required?

    Hi
    Cost center is not a mandatory field for movement type 309.
    Material to material transfer posting is possible only if both the materials are maintained in the same base unit of measure.
    The following additionally applies to material-to-material transfer postings:
    • They cannot be preplanned via a reservation.
    • They can only be posted from unrestricted-use stock of the issuing material to
    unrestricted-use stock of the receiving material.
    • They can only be posted in a single step.
    Hope it helps
    Thanks/Karthik

  • Movement Type 309 Not posting to the correct Cost Center

    Hi,
    We have changed the field status group for movement type 309 to be able to enter profit center. We maintained a cost center determination in OKB9 based on the profit center. However the system is ignoring the profit center entered in the MIGO (309) and picking the profit center from the material master.
    Material Master has Profit center 40000.
    MIGO posting has Profit Center 43005 which in turn has a cost center assigned to 100143005 cost center.
    When we do MIGO 309, with the profit center 43005, the accounting document is posted with profit center 40000 and cost center 100140000. Can anyone tell why is it ignoring the profit center maintained in the transaction?
    I also checked OMJJ and checked the "Account Assignment" box for transaction type AUM.
    Thanks and Regards
    Madhu Vutukuri

    HI,
    check SAPNET note 105024.
    Best regards, Christian

  • G/L account determination for movement type 702, 309

    All SAP Gurus,
    In our plant, for movement type 702 (inventory count), 309 (material to material transfer), some /L account assignment is wrong.
    I suppose these settings are in Keys GBB, AUM and PRD.
    Will cahnging the G/L accounts n these keys will give correct results. Or even soe other keys I (other than GBB, AUM and PRD) need to be changed.
    Please reply
    Regards

    hi
    for inventory use
    gbb>inv
    umbfor inventory and material val
    prv for prise diffrence
    in 702   prv and inv is the postings
    for 309 vbr and pru is transaction in gbb
    1) one more thing u can do is go to OMWb then go to simulation there u can find gl accounts and grouping  keys note down that GL nos
    2) then come one step back
    and clik on  gl accounts  there u will find many gl accounts 
    find gl accont no which u have noted in step 1
    there u can find transaction keys
    by doing this u can find which are transaction keys for a perticular movement type
    reward if helpful
    regards
    kunal

  • Blocking Movement type 309 for perticular user ID

    Hello,
    We want to block Movement Type '309' for perticular user ID.
    How this can be achieved?

    Hi,
    You can do it through autherization  control ,
    For Object
    M_MSEG_BMB     Material Documents: Movement Type
    M_MSEG_BWA     Goods Movements: Movement Type
    M_MSEG_LGO     Goods Movements: Storage Location
    Revove the Movement type 309 , for the particular user.
    Regards
    Manish

  • Error in Standard SAP movement type 309?

    Path: SPRO > Logistic execution > Warehouse Management > Interfaces > Inventory Management > Define
    Movement type > Assign WM Movement Type References to IM Movement Types
    IM Movement type 309 has as Reference Movement types WM 301, 302 and 309.
    IM Movement type 311 has as Reference Movement types WM 311, 312 and 309.
    Path: SPRO > Logistic execution > Warehouse Management > Interfaces > Inventory Management > Define
    Movement type > LE-WM Interface to Inventory Management
    Reference Movement type 301 has WM Movement type 301.
    Reference Movement type 302 has WM Movement type 302.
    Reference Movement type 309 has WM Movement type 309.
    Reference Movement type 311 has WM Movement type 311.
    Reference Movement type 312 have WM Movement type 312.
    Path: SPRO > Logistic execution > Warehouse Management > Activities > Transfers > Define Movement
    types
    WM Movement type 301 has Destination Storage type 920.
    WM Movement type 302 has Source Storage type 920.
    WM Movement type 309 has Source and Destination Storage type 922.
    WM Movement type 311 has Destination Storage type 9210.
    WM Movement type 312 has Source Storage type 921.
    In my opinion this means that if I make an IM movement with movement 309 the material will be picked from a Storage
    bin and moved to Storage type 920. After the change the material will be brought back from Storage type 920 to the same Storage bin.
    The change will be done with WM Movement type 309 in Storage type 922.
    This creates negative stock in both Storage type 920 and 922.
    In my opinion this means that if I make an IM movement with movement 311 the material will be picked from a Storage
    bin and moved to Storage type 921. After the change the material will be brought back from Storage type 921 to the same Storage bin.
    The change will be done with WM Movement type 309 in Storage type 922.
    This creates negative stock in both Storage type 920 and 922.
    Is this an error in SAP standard? Should I Change the Source and Destination Storage types of Movement types 301,302,311 and 312 to 922?

    Hi,
    Please check wheather the material type of the material belongs to NLAG/UNBW or any other type which will not have qty/value updations for that plant at Attributes of the material type at SPROlOGISTICS GeneralMaterial mastermaterila types
    Or take the question  mark which is there on the error screen so that the information will become self explanatory.
    Please reply back with your info.

  • Posting with MM Movement Type 309 material to material: Error in WM

    Hello,
    i post an MM-Movement type (Bewegungsart) 309 (material to material).
    The MM-goods movement works, but then in warehouse mangagement there is a problem:
    The creation of the transfer order (Transportauftrag) stops in many cases.
    The aim is to post Material A to the same storage bin in Warehouse Management where Material B was before.
    I programmed this in user-exit (ZXLToU03) that by movement type 309, always taking same storage bin. But then I often get the error: transfer order could not be created. Then I have to do the creation of tranfer order in foreground and then I get an error like this:
    capacity of the bin location is not enough.
    The Problem is that I do a posting for example:
    001 010101                   to     922 Umbuchungzone    -->  Transfer order Pos 1
    922 Umbuchungszone  to    001 010101                    --> Transfer order Pos 2.
    And so the first transfer order position is not confirmed when I do the transfer order Pos 2.
    How can I confirm Pos 1 by batch-input? The Programm to do 309 should posting 1000 materials in one step. But in Warehouse management I get those problems?
    Is it possible to increase the capacitiy of the storage bin and then decrease it after creation of transfer order(where can I do this and when)???
    I hope anybody can help me.
    Thanks.

    Hello Kevin,
    I donu2019t think it is necessary to use a user exit to keep the Material B (that is transferred from Material A) in the same bin.
    This can be controlled in the customizing: indicator Post to same bin, that can be set in the WM Movement type (V_T333-KZUAP) and in the Storage type (V_T3010-KZUAP).
    Now I donu2019t know your business process but I am surprised that Material B requires more space than Material A since it is u2018bornu2019 by means of a transfer posting and not a production or packing step that makes it bigger in terms of capacity required.
    A workaround for this could be to transfer (LT10) Material A first to a separate Storage type (with the Post to same bin-flag set) that has no Capacity check and after the 309 posting transfer it back into the warehouse with LT10.
    Success and thanks beforehand for any credits!
    Kind regards,
    Bart

  • Material to Material Transfer using Movement Type 309

    Hi,
    We have activated the material ledger.
    Issues:
    When we transfer material A to Material B using Movement Type 309 the price difference from Material A was not allocated to Material B after executing CKMLCP.
    But the another company who using the materail to material transfer, the price difference was allocated to receiving material.

    Hi,
    Please check SAP Note 167722 to able to do multi-level price determination for material transfer with using modification.
    best regards, Takashi

  • Restriction to use mov type 309

    Hi,
    I need to restrict  some of users not to use mov type 309 only, other mov type they need to use, in that case how to do ??
    I knew the object (object name -authorization object is M_MSEG_BWA)  pls tell me the steps?

    Dear Jayakumar,
    While creating the roles using T Code PFCG,after adding the T code MB1B under any role,ask your Basis consultant to look for
    this authorization object M_MSEG_BWA,and dont include the check box for 309 movement and include it for the other
    movement's like 311,312 etc.
    So whatever role that's allowing MB1B should be checked so that it 's not having the authorization for 309 movement.
    Check and revert back.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • Transfer posting mov type 309

    Dear friends,
    Please help me in following scenario,
    In MIGO, I want to do transfer posting from one material to another .using mov. type 309.
    My problem is that, my destination material batch number is comming same as sender material batch number. I want system to automatically create new internal batch number for destination material.
    Please guide.
    Regards,
    Amit Shirsath

    Dear Madam,
    I have done the same using MB11, but i am not able to do the same with MIGO, and my clients requirement is to do with MIGO only..
    Regards,
    Amit Shirsath

  • Limiting users to select articles from movement type 309- SAP retail

    Hi experts,
    My client wants to restriction on limiting users selecting articles from movement type 309 in SAP retail. They need an option to predefine article list which can allows users to transfer articles using movement type 309. Is any standard way to accomplish this requirement or whether it s need ABAP development.
    Thank You & Best Regards
    Sameera

    this BAPI just creates movements, you access your Z-tables from the ABAP that calls this BAPI, isn't it?
    But in the exit EXIT_SAPMM07M_001  you can program to read the Z-tables and do the necessary steps to restrict the usage, hence you can use the standard transactions for the movements without needing an extra program that calls a BAPI.

  • Field Selection error for movement type and G/L account

    I am currently experiencing a field selection error between movement type 601 and G/L account 7140000.  The problem field is 'Segment'.  This field is set to required for the G/L account, but it is hidden for the movement type 601. This inconsistency causes an error when posting the goods movement. According to business requirement the field must be required for the G/L account, therefore we must make this field optional for the movement type.
    However, in configuration the field segment does not appear for the movement type 601. Therefore it can not be changed to optional.
    Does anyone know a workaround other than making this field optional for the G/L account because the business requirement is to have this field as required?????
    Many Thanks

    Hi,
    On the Error message detail, system will guide you to the Configuration details for Field settings for Movement type & Account, please get in touch with your FI consultant, to make the Field selection for the account similr to that of your movement type, this is a very common issue.
    Regards
    Chandra Shekhar

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is there a way to create Timecard Templates from backend?

    Hello Folks Is there a way to create Timecard Templates from backend? I tried to create one with the following steps, but did not work. Throws a HXC_HXT_DEP_VAL_ORAERR The Oracle error is: &ERROR 1. Create TIMECARD_TEMPLATE scope BB using hxc_timesto

  • X200 - Windows 7 - Data partition

    I hope this message will be helpful. Our X200 we just bought with Windows 7 (32-bit) had only one C partition for the system, the programs and the data. I wanted to create a new D partition for data. Unfortunately, it was impossible to do it with the

  • Reset Order By back to default

    When the user logs into the application, if he/she reorders her report by a specific field then exits, the application saves the new order by. When he/she logs back in, the report shows the previous order by rather than the system default. I would li

  • How to set updatable property of view object on runtime

    Hello Gurus, I am new in adf and using jdev 11.1.2.3. I have two view object which has view link and they are based on entity object. In master view i have a column with the name of status. The target is if the value of status is 'active' then i want

  • Color Calibrator can't work properly due to display not filling screen.

    I have a Thinkpad W520 with the HD 1920x1080 display and the color sensor. I tried to run the Color Calibrator application but it always runs to completion but cannot process the measurements. So I opened the lid in the middle of a calibration and di