Gl a/c for overpayment/under payment

hi
what is gl account for overpayment /under payment.
it is expense or income a/c
thank u
shusma

there is nothing like overpayment/underpayment ledger account.
If any excess payment made it should be treated as advance payment and underpayment as payable amount.
Considering expense/income...This is purely depends on transaction type.
Vijay

Similar Messages

Over payments/Under payments for customers

COnfigured the foll for over payments/underpayments for customer:
OBA3 - Maintained toerlances
OBBE - Configured reason code -check marked "charge off difference via separate GL account
OBXL- Assigned reason code to GL account XXXXXX
Ran F-28, still the over payment does not post to the GL account XXXXXX. All it does is it credits the customer for the overpayment amount in new line item.
what am I missing here. we want the over payments and under payments to go this GL account XXXXXX, not to customer account.
The gl account created also has been "Post automaticallyonly" check marked.
please help.

yes it is defined as P&L account.it is posting now to gl account for over payment only. when i do an underpayment like $99 and invocie amount is $100, it gives message "difference is too large for clearing". I have configured tolerances, still it throws this message for Under Payments only. Is there any separate place where we configure the under payments for customers. we have only one gl account to whcih we want to post both over payments and under payments

Down payments request for Asset Under Construction

Hello Expert
while Down Payment request to vendors - for Asset Under Construction, system showing error.
Contact your system administrator (table error)
Message no. AA866
Diagnosis
No account has been entered for posting down payments in area 01 under the account assignment key IN95 (chart of accounts YAIN).
Procedure
Enter the account using the Customizing menu.
Pls Reply frinds.
regards,
Riten patel

Dear:
First check in OAYB that have AUC class been specified for down payments and then go to transaction AO90 and maintain the GL account for depreciation are 01 under the Balance Sheet account in the field Acquisition: Down Payment. It will resolve your issue.
Regards

Down payments for Asset Under Construction

Hi Experts,
Urgent!
My client paying advances to vendors, thru TC-F-48.
Previously there is no PO requirement ,now asper client requirement I put PO fild as requirement in posting key 29.
1)There is no problem for payment to vendors -for Raw materials.
2)while paying advance to vendors - for Asset Under Construction, system showing error.
*Error is:
Contact your system administrator (table error)
Message no. AA866
Diagnosis
No account has been entered for posting down payments in area 01 under the account assignment key 4800 (chart of accounts FTL).
Procedure
Enter the account using the Customizing menu.
Pls Reply frinds.
Regards
vinod

Hi Vinod,
I hope that you are following Valuated goods receipt concept.
Valuated goods receipt: Asset will be debited at the time of goods receipt
Non valuated good receipt: Asset will be debited at the time of invoice receipt
If you follow valuated goods receipt concept, then at the time of making down payment, AUC should not be debited (whatever the value date/ capitalization date be). Please refer SAP note number 310368 (valuated goods receipt paragraph) for reference. In that they have clearly mentioned the steps to make down payment against asset under construction Purchase Order without debiting to AUC and without any error message. You have to make F5 378 message number from error message to warning message and in posting key 29 and 39, you have to supress the asset related fields. If you have done the above settings, then system will not show any error message to update G/L account in AO90 transaction code for the Acquisition: down payments and Down payment clearing - 2nd and 4th field or for AUC related fields.
Hope this helps. Assign points if useful.
Regards
Dwarak.

Profit Ctr derivation for under payment auto posting in F-28

Hello,
I'm trying to apply a customer short payment to an open AR invoice in F-28. We have a 10% tolerance so the invoice is being cleared and remainder booked to the underpayment account. However, this is a revenue series accounts and requires a profit center but SAP is not able to derive the profit center for this account. I was expecting it to find the same profit center that was booked on the AR line of the invoice after splitting.
So, here is the process.
When Billing/AR invoice is posted in SAP either via the billing document in SD or directly in FI, SAP books the following posting.
Debit Customer/AR (No Profit Center at the time of posting)(Entry view)
Credit Revenue (Profit Center is a required field and populated either from the Billing Doc. material or manually in FI)
When this invoice above is saved, new GL Splitting functionality stamps the profit center from the Revenue line on to the Customer Line, so user will see the following. Note that this functionality is working fine.
Debit Customer (Profit Center from the Revenue Line)(GL View)
Credit Revenue (Profit Center from Billing Doc)
When the incoming cash is applied to the customer invoice above in F-28, if the Tolerances are setup, SAP books the following entry.
Debit Cash/Bank (No Profit Center)
Debit Under Payment (No Profit Center)
Credit Customer (Profit Center from the invoice)(GL View)
Now, when splitting process is done, I am expecting the profit center from the AR line(derived from the original invoice) to be stamped to the Underpayment and Bank Account lines but that is not happening.
I don't want to setup defaults in FAGL3KEH or specify profit center manually as short pay should go back to the same profit center that the invoice was generated in.
Any suggestions or pointers are greatly appreciated.
Thanks much for your time
Sumit

Pankaj,
Thanks much for the reply. I have checked this configuration multiple times and everything is in order but still, SAP refuses to tag the profit center on the under payment account.
Have you ever come across this business requirement at any client and if yes, were you able to achieve it via splitting? To me, it seems, SAP is not equipped to handle it since this is not a straight forward splitting. SAP needs to first look at the invoice number at the time of cash application, go back to that invoice and look at the profit center assigned to the AR line after spitting and then, assign it to the short pay account.
Thanks much for your time.
Sumit

Report for Under Payments

Hi,
For displaying partial payments and Residual Payments recieved from the customer in AR in a month we want to create a report to display the same. We are not having any different document type for applying the same till now. So please suggest because
we can identify the residual payment by reason code, but how do we identify the partial payment.
Thanks
Ni

Dear experts
Paritial Payment:
A partial payment is a payment that is posted to an account without any open items being cleared. You assign this partial payment to an open item. When you post the partial payment, the system marks the document number of the original open item in the line item for the partial payment. The original open item and the partial payment remain open.
Suppose original invoice is with 1000 /-
current payment is 500 /-
then it will show both 1000 and 500 as open items with balance 500
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/01/a9bb1f455711d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Residual item:
A residual item results when a payment is made for less than the actual amount outstanding. You clear the original open item, and the system posts a new open item. This new open item is for the same amount as the original open item minus the amount paid.
Suppose original invoice is with 1000 /-
current residual payment is 500 /-
then balance 500 only shown as open item (New line item created during residual payment )
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/01/a9bb1f455711d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards
Ajeesh.s

Over/Under Payment from Customer - Reason Code

We are trying to perform an incoming under payment from a Customer. We do not want to do a partial / residual payment. We would to like to send the difference amount to a particular GL account XXXXXX (bad debt). There might be situations where the difference amount is charged off to another GL account YYYYYY. Can we handle these situations using reason codes?
I tried to configure a couple reason codes to handle this, but couldn't make it work.
Could you please explain in detail how can we make the over/payments to be charged to different accounts.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Venkat

Hi,
You define Reason Codes in Customizing. Use the menu path in IMG :
Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Business Transactions -> Incoming Payments -> Incoming Payments Global Settings -> Overpayment/Underpayment -> Define Reason Codes
In the reason codes definition, tick the check box with Heading 'C' immediately after the Correspondence Type.
Then maintain the settings Define Accounts for Payment Differences. In this setting, you can have different accounts depending on the reason code. Click on Rules and tick the check box against Reason Code. Click on Accounts and maintain the correct accounts against the reason code.
Once you have maintained the above settings, you can post the difference directly to a GL Account using Reason Code. For this, when you enter incoming payment using T-code F-28, in the open item screen, click on the Residual payment tab and enter the residual Amount. Just next to residual tab is the field to enter the reson code. Enter the appropriate Reason code and your posting will be done to a GL Account.
Hope this helps
Regards
Mahendra
Assign points if useful

Under payment and over payment

Dear all,
where to do the setup for under payment and over payment in incoming and outgoing payment.
Regards,
Sarankumar.B

hi
For A/P
From Administration -->> Setup -->> Financials -->> G/L Account Determination -->> Purchasing tab -->> General Subtab
For A/R
From Administration -->> Setup -->> Financials -->> G/L Account Determination -->> Sales tab -->> General Subtab
define a G/L account for the ff.
Overpayment A/P Account & Underpayment A/P Account
update your changes to take effect.
Regards,
Fidel

AP: Tolerance Group under payment transactions

Good Morning SAP Folks-
What is the purpose of the tolerance group under payment transactions under the Vendor Master?
Thank you!

Hi
Incase of difference in vendor payments(overpayment / underpayment), tolerance group assigned in the vendor master determines whether the difference has to be allowed or not.
Assignment of tolerance group in vendor master is optional. General tolarance for Vendors is set in OBA3 transaction in configuration.
Regards
Rengaraj

I have 2 Apple IDs. How can I move all my purchased (paid-for) apps under only 1 of my Apple IDs?

Long ago I bought several, relatively expensive, apps under a old Apple ID.
I then purchased many more paid-for apps under a new Apple ID.
I was unaware that the purchased apps are tied to the Apple ID which I happen to be logged in with, at the time of the purchase: I thought they'd be tied to my authorised PC(s).
Now I'm absolutely sick of having to constantly switch between IDs, even just to CHECK for updates.
What I want to do is move all the paid-for apps which I bought under the old Apple ID to the new Apple ID. Both ID demonstrably belong to me.
Having all my apps under 1 only Apple ID would allow me to update them easily, and no longer be FORCED to switch IDs all the time.
In short I want to use only 1 Apple ID for the future.
If the Apple Store locks the apps to the Apple ID (as it does) instead than to the authorised PC (as it should do), then it should also PREVENT a user from creating a second Apple ID (at least, from the same iTunes installation on the same PC!), or at the very least display a HUGE warning that any paid-for apps purchased under another, older Apple ID will be unavailable under the new Apple ID! The apple Store, and iTunes, do neither thing,
Then the Apple Store and iTunes should at the very least allow a user to put all apps under the same Apple ID!
After all, the Apple Store and iTunes on my PC and iTunes on my Iphone can all "see" that I own TWO legitimate Apple IDs (with purchases and updates): it must be possible to move these apps from one ID to the another ID, at least once! They're MY OWN purchases, paid: can I manage them a bit easier?
Marco

No, it seems you don't (want to) understand. I see 2 things very wrong with your explanation.
1. The move would only need to happen between "accounts" demonstrably and legitimately belonging to the same user. In fact, I'm still using both the old one (for updates only, no new purchases) and the new one (updates and purchases -- actually no morep urchases until Apple solves this). And unless I'm mistaken, I can already have my apps on more than one iDevice at the time: eg. on 1 iPhone and1 iPad. I don't ask for apps to be moved between unrelated accounts: only between accounts belonging to the same "person". And I do not see how changing what is effectively just a "label" embedded in the binary files residing on my hard disk (or in the cloud), which can be verified as legitimately belonging to me thru two ID registered on the same authorised PC could possibly allow anyone to cheat the system. The apps' files have embedded an old label before, and a new label after the operation, both belonging to me, associated to my payment details. That's not rocket science.
In fact, both my Apple ID were at some point linked to the same credit card. And in fact, I only created a second one because at some point I managed to forget my Hotmail EMAIL password, not my Apple STORE password!
The two passwords needn't be the same, adding to the confusion. For months I used that account to buy apps, and never checked the email, since I was not interested in marketing from Apple, and I could see the payments from my credit card statements: that's how I forgot my Hotmail EMAIL password for that Hotmail email address.
Since Microsoft wouldn't allow me to access my Hotmail account anymore (and rightly so, becuase I managed to exhaust all possibilities, and even forgot the security question), and so I could not check my Apple Store emails, I then decided to create a new account, this time with a Live! email address, and this time I used the same password for both the Live! EMAIL and the Apple STORE authentication.
For more than TWO years I used the old Hotmail Apple ID to get updates, without during all that time being able to read the email or access that Hotmail account: this should tell you how stupid this system is! And for the same time, and until last month (I no longer buy anything), I used the new ID for both NEW purchases and their updates.
Now after getting both a new iPhone (only because the old one was unfortunately stolen on my holiday) and a new PC, i NO longer want to be forced to use both IDs, which forces me to constantly switch between them, and also carries the risk that I inadvertently purchase something with the old one, to which EMAIL address I no longer have access: so I can't even check invoices. But most of all, I don't want to be inconvenienced like this by Apple.
Since the Apple ID is such an important concept, forever ID tied to your purchases, it should NOT be an email address, which are disposable by their own nature. When creating it, one is naturally driven to think it'll only be needed to check Apple Store's emails and newsletters and the such. Why should people be forced to FOREVER use an email address, perhaps linked to a job or relationship they had years earlier, to update their purchases?
The thing is, Apple made the Apple IDs as email addresses simply to ensure that as many people as possible can at any time buy as many apps and songs as possible: just create a new Apple ID: after all, it is (seems) just an email address! and you're done. But they DON'T telly you they'll tie FOREVER your purchases to it. So you're reasonably entitled to think they'll tie them to your payments details, until you discover otherwise the hard way.
And since most Apple users feel humbled by Apple (the "genial" idea of calling "Genius" the support guys at the stores, wo usually don't have a clue on anyhting less than trivial, is part of this) and fear of feeling "stupid" for getting wrong soemthing with what are supposed to be the most user-friendly company and products, they will simply buy the apps again under the new ID, bringing more profits to Apple. This also can't be casual.
My apps are available, under both Apple IDs at the same time, to iTunes: be it on my PC on in the iCloud. The same mechanism that physically "embeds" that Apple ID in the app file when I first buy it, can surely be used to change it afterwards. It's just a matter of willing to do so. This content (apps, songs, etc) may be digital (that is, files) rather than traditional (eg. books), but I assure you that the disk blocks taken by the app or song files in the iTunes directory on my PC or in the iCloud are as physical as a book or a mp3 player: they CAN be changed in a perfectly safe and trackable way, without risk of cheating. Ever heard of MAC addresses? Or other unique info that can easily be gathered from the PC's operating system or BIOS? or credit card details, already available?
2. The policy of inconveniencing (punishing) the huge majority of users (citizens) to prevent a tiny minority from misbehaving can be good for sheep, but not for rational people. It's typical of unimaginative, monopolistic companies (oppressive governments), not of progressive, modern and innovative ones. The cost of protecting their proficts from those who would steal from them is theirs (the company's), not ours (the users'). They should be more creative and inventive, in finding solutions to stop 10 people who would misuse their system, rather than annoying the 10 million who won't. I would never do so (mostly because I thing it's morally wrong, but also because I can't be bothered), but I understand why people invent ways to circumvent this gratuituos, bullish constraints.
Also, CAN'T you REALLY see the difference between these TWO options:
- allowing a user to change an app's associated account ONCE IN A LIFETIME, even only ONCE per app
- FORCING a user to switch Apple IDs EVERY TIME (DAY, OR WEEK) FOREVER, to check and/or update
??? Am I talking to a person, or to a robot, or to a undercover Apple employee here?
Both things are possible. The second is more convenient financially for Apple, that's all.
But it's also so clearly unfair to their customers. No more, thanks.
To finish, many if not almost all of the issues in threads like https://discussions.apple.com/message/18954743#18954743 (like husband and wife sharing a PC with two iPhones, or kids' gifts, etc) really boil down to this issue, despite being often complicated by sloppy explanation (when they say "password" , do they mean the Apple ID's or the Email account's?, and so on) and unreasonable requests (like having the same app, only paid once, available under two IDs, even if on the same PC: this is not what I ask, and it's unreasonable) -- and could be solved by the concept of a "master" ID and "secondary" ID: if you read well, the real issue is almost always for everybody having to switch between "old" (or "wife's", "kids'") and new (or "husband's", "dad's") Apple IDs: and this must be done on BOTH the iTunes application on the PC or Mac, and on the devices themselves.

Accounting document while VF01 for credit card payments

Hi Friends,
While creating billing document for credit card payments, system creates accounting document as under. One FI document for all the below line items.
Dr. Customer
Cr. Revenue
Cr. Customer
Dr. Card receivable.
Instead is it possible to generate two documents, like ...
1. Dr. Customer Cr. Revenue
2. Cr. Customer Dr. Card receivalbe. (document type is different, i want to take DZ)
Pl let me know.
Thanks in advance,
Srini

Hi,
Have a look to below blog, it is regarding e-payment, but you can refer this for your approach.
/people/aashish.sinha/blog/2011/02/24/e-payment-a-customized-solution-other-than-sap-integration-package-swift-150-part-1
Regards
Aashish Sinha

What is the T code for paying down payment for assets

hi,
please let me know if , f-90 has to be used for downpayment with transaction type 180, or there is any other transaction for it

Hello Sai
Define the asset number and sub-number as optional entry in accounts payable Customizing in the field status group for the reconciliation account for vendor down payments (transaction OBC4).
In the field status of the posting key for vendor down payments, you also need to define the asset number and sub-number as optional entry.
Then you can enter the asset under construction when posting with F-48 and accounts for asset down payments will be posted.
Regards
Javier Reviriego

Over Under Payment

Hello
I am developing an Add-On which i use to send payments to an invoice, i would like to use the functionality of over under payment from SAP Business One.
When i pay to an invoice more than it should be (over payment), it works fine. But when we try to do it under, it doesnt work, it leaves the invoice open.
Which object should i use, the invoices.Summaplied??
Thanks
Jacobo

Yeah,
For understanding that try tthe following...
1. Post a normal complete payment aganist an invoice.. then check the entries in the corresponding tables ( ORCT and child table)
2. Now post an underpaid invoice and check the tables and see the differenct the remainig amt will be posted to another acc or something... if u can get that field then u can do the same in SDK also..
I'm busy with other things or i would have did the above and tell u the filed.. just try the above...
But my guess is it could be *UnderOverpaymentdifference Property * check for the data of this field in both the situations.
Hope it helps,
Vasu Natari.

Over/Under Payment Question

For a customer I want to be able to handle over/under payments different depending on whether there is a small or large over or under payment. If there is a small difference, I want the difference to go to a seperate G/L account. If there is a large difference, I would like to have the difference posted as a residual. I have a EDI process that is filtering this data in and will always use a reason code with it. I have attached this reason code to a G/L account.
What I have experienced is that I through the process I can get the difference to post to the seperate G/L account - but it is posted there whether it is a small or large difference. I have tried to change tolerance amounts for both the company code group and the user group, but this does not seem to make a difference.
Is there a way anybody knows that I could have some sort of tolerance or restriction on the G/L account so only small amounts would be placed into the account and larger amounts would have a residual created?

So how would I get the small differences to automatically clear to a seperate G/L account?
I still need the functionallity of automatically posting the small differences to the G/L account, but posting the larger differences to a residual.

RG1 updation for Exports under cliam of Rebates.

Hi All,
I would like to know what is the classification type used in u201CExports under claim of Rebatesu201D, while updating RG1 for FG sales (J1I5).
IDE -Removal on payment of duty for export under no bond
Or
IDH- Removal from factory on payment of duty for Home use
Thanks & Regards,
Ram

for Exports , we should always use IDE
IDE- Export under no BOnd
IWE- Export Under BOND
IWT - For Transfer w/o duty
IWO - w/o duty for Other purpose

Gl a/c for overpayment/under payment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for