GL account different during simulation in MIRO

Hi,
GL account is entered manually in MIRO. But while simulation system changes the GL account automatically.
What are the possible reasons for this ? Please help.
Thanks and Regards,
Maheshwari

Total invoice amount u2013 1982.07
Line item (PO amount) u2013 1688.41
Line item (GL account u201CAu201D amount) u2013 293.66
While simulation:
Vendor account u2013 1982.07 Credited
GL account u201CBu201D u2013 1688.41 Debited
GL account u201CBu201D u2013 293.66 Debited -> Instead of GL account u201CAu201D, u201CBu201D is getting debited?
Thanks and Regards,
Maheshwari

Similar Messages

Accounting document during MIGO or MIRO

hi
all an accounting document is generated ,when it is generated during MIRO or MIGO ?
can we able to view these in MB51 ?
Regards
Leo Thilak.MS

Hi,
While posting stock posting movement in MIGO - accounting document has generated .
You can view the material document in t.code MB51 - Material document for a material
MR51- Accounting document for a material
MBAL -Archieved material document
MBSM-Cancelled Material document
MB03- Material document list
MIRO- accounting document posting
All the stock update in your plant accounting document has generated except 101K, 541, etc
FB03 - There choose List option, you can view the accounting document for the MIRO posting by select document type RE-Invoice
Fiscal year, Material etc
Thanks,
Thiru
Edited by: thiru on Jan 18, 2011 11:33 AM

Accounts hit during different MM transactions

Could anybody help in knowing the accounts hit during below transactions in MM.
With Std price method of valuation, during different scenarios - GR, IR & Payment
Normal procurement from vendor - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
STO between plants - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
STO between co codes - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
Subcontracting - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference, accounting of bi product & scrap
Consignment - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
With MAP method of valuation, during different scenarios - GR, IR & Payment
Normal procurement from vendor - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
STO between plants - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
STO between co codes - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
Subcontracting - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference, accounting of bi product & scrap
Consignment - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
Thanks
Muralidharan B

Hi,
For Domestic Procurement of Raw Material
            During GR
Material Stock             Dr.
GR/IR clearing                        Cr.
            During Excise Invoice Credit
Cenvat Account          Dr.
Cenvat Clearing                      Cr.
            During Invoice Verification
Cenvat Clearing          Dr.
GR/IR Clearing           Dr.
Vendor Payable                      Cr.
For Import Procurement of Raw Material
            During Customs Duty Clearing invoice
Custom Clearing         Dr.
Custom Payable                      Cr.
            During GR
Material Stock             Dr.
GR/IR clearing                        Cr.
            During Excise Invoice Credit
Cenvat Account          Dr.
Custom Clearing                     Cr.
            During Invoice Verification
GR/IR Clearing           Dr.
Vendor Payable                      Cr.
For Excise Duty Credit of Raw Material without PO
Cenvat Account          Dr.
Cenvat Clearing                      Cr.
For Excise Duty Reversal through Excise JV
Cenvat Clearing          Dr.
Cenvat Account                      Cr.
What should be my accounting entry when the goods are issued through MM and excise invoice is created (J1IS & J1IV)?
During Excise Invoice Creation
Cenvat Suspense Account      Dr.
Cenvat payable                                   Cr.
For TR6C Challan
PLA Account              Dr.
PLA on hold Account             Cr.
During Fortnightly Utilization
Cenvat payable            Dr.
Cenvat Account                      Cr.
PLA Account                          Cr.
Note: Cenvat Suspense Account should be cleared appropriately using FI JV's.
What should be my accounting entry in subcontracting reversal / Recredit?
For Subcontracting Challan Reversal
Cenvat Reversal          Dr.
Cenvat Account                      Cr.
For Subcontracting Challan Recredit
Cenvat Account          Dr.
Cenvat Reversal                      Cr.
pherasath

Cenvat clearing account is not coming in MIRO for Basic excise

Dear sir,
I have created the PO . After that i did GR for same at that I capture excise invocie& post it.
Accounting document is created for the same
here is accounting enrtry
        cenvat Basic = 100 debit
        cenvat edu cess = 2 debit
       Cenvat Higher Ecess =1 debit.
   Cenvat clearing account = 103 credit
when i go the miro
after simulating in miro i found
cenvat clearing account = 2 debit
but it should be 103 debit
why this is coming please help me...

Hi,
Generally it happens if CENVAT Clearing Account in not assigned in OB40 to the Tax Account Keys. But, as per you it has been maintained. So the following if you are using Tax Procedure TAXINN;
SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Basic Settings > Determination of Excise Duty > Condition-Based Excise Determination > Classify Condition Types

Addition of G/L items in Accounting Document during creationof Material Doc

Hi All
I am looking for User exit or BADI that allows me to add additional G/L line items (offsets) in Accounting Document during creation of Material Document. I wish to do this when I save Material document in MIGO, MB01 or MIRO.
Has anyone done this before? Is there any user exit, badi or function module to do this. Please share insight on this situation.
Thanks in advance
Sunny

Hi,
check out BADI MB_DOCUMENT_BADI this would trigger before and during update task while posting Material documents i think you can ful fill your requirement with this.
Regards,
Himanshu

May i specify the G/L account when i using the MIRO ?

Dear Guru,
Fist , let me explain the problem...
Some PO are created & already receipted. Now we got the invoice from the vendor and found that amount was differen from the PO because of the PO not include the landing cost...
Hence, i want to sperate these amount to each G/L and i found that in MIRO the bottom tabs there has one tab named G/L Account and it also have some fields ... ...
Is it this function can satisfy my requirement even if it is 'Subsequence debit' ?
Thanks a lot !
Carlos

Hi,
Unplanned delivery costs are delivery costs that were not agreed upon in the
purchase order and that are first entered upon invoice receipt. When you enter
the invoice, you enter the total amount of the unplanned delivery costs on the
Detail tab page.
In Customizing for Materials Management under Logistics Invoice Verification→
Incoming Invoice → Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted, you
can specify whether the system automatically posts the unplanned delivery costs
to the individual items or to a separate G/L account.
If the unplanned delivery costs are posted to a separate G/L account, the unplanned
delivery costs are not debited to the stocks or the account assignment objects.
The system does not show unplanned delivery costs that are posted to a separate
G/L account, in the PO history.
You can only post an invoice containing only unplanned delivery costs with
reference to a purchase order, if at least one invoice has already been posted for
the purchase order. Otherwise all the invoiced values would be zero, and it would
not be possible to distribute the delivery costs
The system apportions the unplanned delivery costs to the items in proportion to
the total value invoiced so far and the values in the current invoice.
You can also distribute unplanned delivery costs manually to individual invoice
items, by changing the amounts of the invoice items. Since in this case the delivery
costs are entered in the same way as price variances, the system performs a price
check, and the invoices are blocked wherever the tolerances set in Customizing
are exceeded.
The way in which the system posts unplanned delivery costs depends on the
settings in Customizing. They are either distributed automatically to the individual
invoice items or posted to a separate G/L account.
During automatic distribution, the unplanned delivery costs are posted according
to the price control.
For a material with moving average price, the system posts to the stock
account as long as there is a stock coverage.
For a material with standard price, the system posts the unplanned delivery
costs to the price difference account you have set up.
reward points if helpful
rgds
Lakshmi Reddy

Unexpected reboot during simulation using multisim on AMD dual core processor

We are using NI-multisim 10 in a classroom environment and are experiencing sudden reboots during simulation without giving any error or warning. This happens on multiple machines, all being Dell Optiplex 740 with AMD DC 2Ghz as processor. Since these problems happen so frequently, making teaching quite impossible, we have shifted PC-room and are now using older machines. On these machines - Dell GX280 using intell P4HT-2,8 Ghz - we experience no more problems.
Is this reboot problem related to the article : Unexpected Errors with DAQ Device on AMD Dual Core Machine (http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/9CE22FE099AFB8BF862572FF007A5D45) and what do we have to do to fix this problem?

Nic
Can you verify your driver versions? Make sure that you are running the latest versions of NI drivers to ensure proper compatibility. If possible, you might try upgrading to multisim 11. If this does not solve the issue, try the single processor workaround in outlined in the following KB:
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/D0FC3BE7D9F331398625731A005D76B8?OpenDocument
Altough it is surely decreasing the performance of the system, certain cases have shown that there is no other possible workaround unfortunately.
Best Regards
Michiel
Applications Engineer
NI Belgium
http://www.ni.com/ask

Vendor Reconcilation account change during the document posting

Hello Experts,
I have one doubt about the Vendor Reconcilation account change during the document posting.
Is there any way/possibility to change the vendor reconcillation account during the document posting, for a particular vendor.
If is there any chance please let me know the way how to change it and also letme know the impact of this.
Thanks in Adavance,
Satya

The System always takes the reconciliation account stored into the Vendor master data.
Technically it is possible to change reconciliation account in vendor master record as follows:
1) SPRO -> Financial Accounting -> AR and AP -> Vendor accounts -> Master Records -> Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Records -> Define Screen Layout per Activity (Vendors) -> Change Vendor (Accounting) -> Company Code Data ->
Account management -> field 'Reconciliation account' set to 'optional entry'
2) Then system will allow you to change reconciliation account in vendor master record.
In general you can only change recon account when balance is zero.
"By changing the reconciliation account in the open item master record the proportionate values from the items open at the time of change are not posted to the new reconciliation account.
Hope this claifies.
Kind Regards
Soumya
Edited by: Soumya Rao on Oct 13, 2011 12:51 PM

MV50AFZ1 - Change Accounting Document During PGI

Using MV50AFZ1 User - Exit ,can i change accounting document during PGI.I want to change the Business Area.
If not ,please tell me which User Exit can help me in this.
Thanx,
Viru

Hi
business add-in LE_SHP_GOODSMOVEMENT for ur requirement
Discuss with the abaper and proceed according to ur requirement and be very specific so that it should not influence the others.
This badi during processing of PGI u can change the data related to accounting document.According to ur requirement the business area can be changed during PGI.
Edited by: sameer basha on Mar 25, 2009 7:41 AM

User exit during invoice verification (MIRO) and PO creation

Hi,
    I have a following scenario to be support by ABAP development
1. During invoice verification (MIRO) system should allow users to manually make any changes in amount and qty proposed by system.
2. During purchase order creation i need a warning message in case of this po is first creating for that particular article and vendor combination.
   so that user will get alerted in case of wrongly choosen the vendor.Many a times user create wrong po, wrong GR and wrong invoice.
since the business process activities are decentralized, person who is making GR is differ from the peron who had created po and invoice.
Ex: material DCF is supplying by vendor VLC international, where there is one more vendor name with VLC traders. due to this name some time users will prepare wrong po, wrong GR and wrong invoice.
   plz suggest how can i suggest my ABAPER to control this mistakes.

Hi,
you can check out the following exits while PO creation:
EXIT_SAPMM06E_006
EXIT_SAPMM06E_007
EXIT_SAPMM06E_008
EXIT_SAPMM06E_009
EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
EXIT_SAPMM06E_013
EXIT_SAPMM06E_014
EXIT_SAPMM06E_016
EXIT_SAPMM06E_017
EXIT_SAPMM06E_018
Thanks.

Mixed Angle Error during simulation

I'm trying to build a mixed-angle project in DVDSP 4.2.0. I've encoded both the main V1 track as VBR with only chapter markers, closed GOP and in Compressor settings made sure the "include chapter markers only" option was checked to prevent any forced I-frames.
When importing the alternate angles into the V2-V9 streams everything goes fine, cell markers are placed both at the beginning and end of the angle and all angles are exactly the same length. However during simulation I get the "Illegal angle situation..." error message. I've gone over settings both from exporting the file from FCP and Compressor - everything checks out according to both the DVDSP4 manual and the Compressor Guide from Brian Gary - can't make heads or tails of it.
Any suggestions greatly appreciated as I'm on deadline.

I had accidentally done two things wrong:
1. I did not send out the main V1 streams from FCP with "DVD Studio Pro" markers, but Chapter Markers instead, and;
2. I manually put a chapter marker at the beginning of the very first chapter. DVDSP4 automatically puts one there called "start".
Now all my mixed angles work perfectly throughout the 2 discs - all 59 of them!
Nothing like finding your own answers!! (^_*)

HT1689 I changed the ID app store to new account but during updating or download still showing the old ID

I changed my Iphone 4 ID account, but during the update and download still showing the old ID

All apps, all paid and free apps include DRM protection which is tied to the iTunes account or Apple ID that was used to download the apps.
You must use the iTunes account or Apple ID that was used to download an app in order to install an app update.
Not possible to transfer apps from one iTunes account or Apple ID to another and the same for merging accounts.

Stimilus profile, CSV import to modify parameter during simulation

Hello,
I need to do the following :
- import a CSV file in the stimulus profile edtior
- Assign some of the variables to channels which are model parameters. These must be modified / updated during simulation.
- The channels are typically "starter, accelerator pedal". These are "parameters" of the models, not "in ports".
I'm having this situation because of the way the simulink model is compiled. There are no / few "in ports" but mostly "parameters" which can be modified.
It works fine with the workspace, the "car" can be started and controlled through the usual veristand workspace GUI.
But the stimulus profile editor fails to modify these "parameters". I've tried the demos, I could see how the inports can be modified but when I try to do the same with parameters, the "parameters" channels are not modified as expected by the CSV from stimulus editor.
Anybody have faced similar problems ?
Is it a bug/limitation in Veristand stimulus profiled editor ? Only inports can be updated during simulation (parameters of model cannot be updated during sim ?)
I've tried Veristand 2011 and 2012, with the same results.

This is a limitation of how VeriStand treats parameters. VeriStand is designed to optimize setting parameters around the use-case of setting it from the host, not from the control loop directly.
Do you have control over the model? In some circumstances you can replace Constant blocks with VeriStand IO blocks to switch the parameters to inports.
If that is not an option, you have a few options to consider:
1. In VeriStand 2012 there is a Stimulus Profile step to apply a set of model parameters. This is not a replay-type step. You only apply one value per parameter in the file, rather than playing back a waveform of some sort.
2. You can use LabVIEW (or Python, C#, TestStand, etc.) and the VeriStand execution API to read a CSV file and call SetParameterValues in a loop to send values down to the target. Note, however, that this replay will not be deterministic, because you can't really control the timing of setting parameters very exactly. This would mimic what you are doing from the Workspace.
3. Similar to #2, you can record a Workspace Macro of the parameter manipulation you do in the Workspace and then play that back. Again, this won't have deterministic execution, but maybe it's good enough.
Jarrod S.
National Instruments

Multisim 11 only uses one CPU core during simulation

Hi,
Just recently I've been using MultiSim again, v11 if that matters, and simulating goes slow, to my opinion that is.
Now there are two things that I've noticed:
- Multisim only uses one of two CPU cores during simulation, not both;
- I've enabled CPU throttle (AMD's Cool'n'Quiet) but corespeed remains very low even though Multisim needs CPU power while simulating.
The simulating of a NE555-based LED-flash circuit requires about 28 seconds to get to 100ms in the simulation. Now if I can get the CPU to throttle up, by for example having Prime95 stress one of the two cores, then the simulation only requires 12 seconds to get to 100ms.
So here are my two questions:
1. Is Multisim 11 capable of using more than one CPU core while simulating? If yes, how can I get it to use more than one?
2. Probably not the right forum to ask, but is there a way to force Windows 7 Ultimate x64 to throttle up the CPU when Multisim starts simulating? Since Multisim does not seem to stress the only core it uses enough to throttle it up. Using Prime95 on one core does trigger a throttle up.
With regards,
Bart Grefte
Relevant specs:
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Multisim v11
AMD A4-3400
16GB RAM

Completely forgot this topic....
Is there a good reason why there is no multicore support? Multisim can certainly use it for simulating.
As for the CPU throttling, I found a batch that can increase/decrease the "minimum processor state"-setting and it works immediately, no reboot required.
@echo off
powercfg.exe -getactivescheme > "%userprofile%\appdata\~apo.tmp"
set /p v_currentscheme= <"%userprofile%\appdata\~apo.tmp"
set v_currentscheme=%v_currentscheme:~24,36%
del "%userprofile%\appdata\~apo.tmp"
powercfg -setacvalueindex %v_currentscheme% 54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00 893dee8e-2bef-41e0-89c6-b55d0929964c %1
powercfg -setdcvalueindex %v_currentscheme% 54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00 893dee8e-2bef-41e0-89c6-b55d0929964c %1
powercfg -s %v_currentscheme%
exit
Usage is simple:
Start -> run -> c:\pathtobatch.bat 100
for "minimum processor state"-setting at 100%
Start -> run -> c:\pathtobatch.bat 5
for "minimum processor state"-setting at 5%
Please note that "set v_currentscheme=%v_currentscheme:~24,36%" is not the same for every language. The original batch had "set v_currentscheme=%v_currentscheme:~19,36%" (most likely for the English version of Windows 7), but since my Windows install is in Dutch, I had to change it in order for it to work.
Running the batch with @echo off removed will show why.

Accounting substitution during MIRO

Hello Experts,
I need to define substitution during MIRO
Process is :
When material is received from foreign vendor, exchange rate used is as on the date of mat receipt. But the requirement is to valuate the inventory
with exchange rate prevailing on invoice date (ex rate declaration date)
Currently, system takes difference between invoice date's ex rate and mat receipt date's ex rate to exchange gain/loss.
During MIRO such exchange gain/ loss is posted to, say, account 611400 account
I need to define substitution rule wherein system posts such gain/loss to different GL account,say, 520430. So that exchange gain/loss on only such transaction is readily available for reporting requirement.
How such substitution rule can be defined.
Thanks in advance.
Regards

Hi
Please, see these notes
SAP Note 116250 - MR08/MR8M:Cancellation+exchange rate diffrnces(KDM)
SAP Note 165635 - Documentation: Enhancement LMR1M001 (MM-IV)
SAP Note 1156325 - BAdIs in the Logistics Invoice Verification environment
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

GL account different during simulation in MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for