GL Account not consistent

Hi
When we are processing MIGO for a PO we are getting error message GL ac so and so in not consistent and if I double click on that message below detial message is getting displayed:
This line item carries the "W" posting line identification. The master record for GL Account 2150000 in company code 1000 must have the "balance only in local currency " indicator  if the W identifier is set.
What is "W" posting line identification. Please let me know the solution for this issue
Regards
Padma.

Hi,
As this error is pertaining to GL master check this account under FS00 and tick "only balance in local currency" as it is your GR/IR clearing account  which should be managed as open item basis.
Moreover, also make sure field status to this GL (for line item) and of account group (obd4) are in sync.
In OBYC, you have assigned this account under your wrx i.e. GR/IR clearing.
Hope above will help you.
Regards,
Valay Pandya

Similar Messages

  • GR/IR Clearing Account 2..... Not Consistent

    SAP Experts,
    I blocked GR/IR clearing account temporarely while I updated the open line item field. It turns out that after I finish running the program and unblocked the account. Receiving ca no longer receeive into teh account it says "G/L Accuont 2...... Not Consistent"
    Does anyone knows what could possibly be?

    I was able to go into IMG bring the field " Only Balances in Local Currency" then went into account brought it to a "ZERO Balance" with TCODE FB50. Went into FS00 and updated field. Then reversed entry, and it works fine.

  • G/L Account currency is not consistent  with G/L Interim Account currency

    Hello
    A few days ago I was  printing checks and suddenly an error occurs
    it says something like..."Another user is accessing the same account"
    In the reserch   I found help in SAP Portal, where I showed how to unlock this part
    This I did in Administration->Set up-> Banking-> House Bank accounts
    At the end is a column that says BLOCK PRINTING, always locked, but when the error occurs is enabled for the account that has been affected, and a  super user must unlock by unchecking the check box.
    The problem is that the update that part I get an error message and I have not been able to unlock
    The error is
    G/L Account currency is not consistent  with G/L Interim Account currency [Message 60701-9]
    In this regard I have not found anything to help me resolve this error and the printing of checks is blocked
    I need your  help
    Regards.
    Yen

    Hi
    i found the problem,  we have an  accunt that is just visible  in  House bank accunt window when try to select an account in the column G/L intermin account,  but  that account is  not an active account ,  the descrpction says "Copy express transport account" i delete it in all the rowa and  finaly  we could update the window.
    Regards
    Yen

  • Data Package is not consistent error

    Hi All,
    We have a Bex issue the screenshot of which is given in the link below. We have an info cube which has huge data volume. We load it very frequently (every hour from 2 sources). This info cube has been loading from say last 5 years. We stopped compressing the data about an year ago for some reason. We are thinking of compressing the data sometime soon. All of a sudden, users are getting the error shown in the link below more frequently. No much information is available at Service Market place about this issue. Can somebody please throw some light on this?
    [Error Screenshot|https://photos-1.dropbox.com/i/l/orsd6TKDlIBVoH4JO79GWQAPNFPlTa88QJ0zkV7Lcc0/53945346/1324418400/3799537/Bex%20Error.JPG#1]
    Thanks and Regards
    Subray Hegde

    Hi Deepak,
    I am not able to attach a screenshot. Somebody directed me to servimg.com but, I do not know how to create an account in this site. The error reads like this:
    "Error Aggregates of <Infocube> were compressed. Data package is not consistent. Error. Error while reading data; navigation possible.".
    Thanks and Regards
    Subray Hegde

  • EVENT_KEYPRESS in Linux not consistant

    Hello all,
    things don't happen as expected in a keypress event in a panel callback:
    printf("\n0x%08x - %s%s%s '%c' - Remains 0x%08x",
    eventData1,
    eventData1&VAL_SHIFT_MODIFIER?" Shift":"",
    eventData1&VAL_UNDERLINE_MODIFIER?" Alt":"",
    eventData1&VAL_MENUKEY_MODIFIER?" Ctrl":"",
    eventData1&0xFF,
    eventData1&~(VAL_SHIFT_AND_MENUKEY|VAL_UNDERLINE_MODIFIER|
    VAL_ASCII_KEY_MASK|VAL_VKEY_MASK) );
    I press [A]:
    0x00000061 - 'a' - Remains 0x00000000
    Shouldn't that be 'A' ?
    I press [Ctrl-A]:
    0x00140041 - Ctrl 'A' - Remains 0x00100000
    Why is bit 20 activated ? It's not referenced as far as I can tell.
    I press [Shift-A]:
    0x00000041 - 'A' - Remains 0x00000000
    Why is bit 16 NOT activated ?
    I press [Alt-A]:
    0x00020061 - Alt 'a' - Remains 0x00000000
    Shouldn't that be 'A' ?
    I press [Shift-Alt-A]:
    0x00030041 - Shift Alt 'A' - Remains 0x00000000
    So now we get the shift bit in addition to the uppercase ? That's just not
    consistent.
    I press [Shift-Ctrl-A]:
    0x00150041 - Shift Ctrl 'A' - Remains 0x00100000
    Bit 20 again
    I press [Ctrl-Alt-A]:
    No event...
    I press [Shift-Ctrl-Alt-A]:
    0x00170041 - Shift Alt Ctrl 'A' - Remains 0x00100000
    Bit 20 again
    Guillaume Dargaud
    http://www.gdargaud.net/

    Hi Guillaume,
    I'll try to explain those one-by-one, although in some cases this is behavior that goes back almost 20 years, and I can only guess as to the original reasons:
    I press [A]:
    0x00000061 - 'a' - Remains 0x00000000
    Shouldn't that be 'A' ??
    Only modified keys convert the character code to uppercase. A simple keypress on a letter key leaves the letter unmodified. If you only press the letter key, without the <Shift> modifier, you should expect to receive the lower-case letter code, since that is what you pressed. If you press <Shift-A> that is still considered an unmodified key (more on that below, in the [Shift-A] discussion). But in that case, the 'a' is converted to uppercase since that is the effect of the <Shift> key.
    I press [Ctrl-A]:
    0x00140041 - Ctrl 'A' - Remains 0x00100000
    Why is bit 20 activated ? It's not referenced as far as I can tell.?
    This extra bit is only present in Linux, from what I can tell. I did some debugging to find out why the bit was set, and my best guess is that this is a holdover from the CVI for Sparc days (where a lot of the Linux-specific code migrated from) in order to account for additional modifier keys in the Sparc keyboard. Whereas modern PC keyboards have only the <Ctrl> key, I believe that Sparc keyboards in the past had an additional modifier key (<Opt> key?). Therefore, in keyboards that had only the <Ctrl> key, the policy back then was that the <Ctrl> key mapped to both keys on the Sparc, and two flags were set accordingly. In Unix, those flags have different bit values, and that is why there is an extra bit in Linux. I can't really justify this behavior today, other than that it needs to be preserved for backwards compatibility. I think you should simply ignore that bit when you check for the presence of the various modifiers.
    I press [Shift-A]:
    0x00000041 - 'A' - Remains 0x00000000
    Why is bit 16 NOT activated ??
    When you press <Shift-a>, your keyboard translates that into simply 'A'. That is the policy whenever you have a simple <Shift> modifier applied to any of the alphanumeric characters. Note that this also applies to number keys ('1', '2', ...) since these keys have a different character that is sent whenever the <Shift> key is pressed. For example, in the English-language keyboard, the key with the number '2' has the '@' symbol above it. Therefore, when I press <Shift-2>, that event is translated by the keyboard driver into <@> and CVI then removes the <Shift> modifier. By contrast, when you press <Shift-F1>, the <Shift> modifier remains, since <F1> is never converted into another character.
    The bottom line is that a <Shift>, as the lone modifier, is a special case when applied to a single alphanumeric character. It doesn't really count as a modifier. Instead, it simply determines which ASCII character you really get ('a' or 'A', '2' or '@', etc...)
    I press [Alt-A]:
    0x00020061 - Alt 'a' - Remains 0x00000000
    Shouldn't that be 'A' ?
    No, it should not. For the same reason that pressing [A] results in 'a', <Alt-A> also results in <Alt> + 'a'.
    I press [Shift-Alt-A]:
    0x00030041 - Shift Alt 'A' - Remains 0x00000000
    So now we get the shift bit in addition to the uppercase ? That's just not
    consistent.
    This is because <Shift-Alt-a> is a modified keypress and in those cases, the <Shift> bit is not removed, and the character code is promoted to uppercase.
    I press [Shift-Ctrl-A]:
    0x00150041 - Shift Ctrl 'A' - Remains 0x00100000
    Bit 20 again
    This is for the same reason that <Ctrl-A> has bit 20 set.
    I press [Ctrl-Alt-A]:
    No event...
    The <Ctrl-Alt> modifier combination is filtered out, in Windows. I believe it is sent in Linux. Unfortunately I can't tell you why this is, as this is also very old behavior and, even though it is intentional, I don't know the rationale for it. I suspect that this is why you cannot use <Ctrl-Alt> as a hot key combination for a control -- only <Ctrl>, <Shift>, and <Ctrl-Shift>.
    I press [Shift-Ctrl-Alt-A]:
    0x00170041 - Shift Alt Ctrl 'A' - Remains 0x00100000
    Bit 20 again
    This is for the same reason that <Ctrl-A> has bit 20 set.
    Luis

  • Error : GL not consistent

    Hi,
    My client has created a PO.In that they have added the freight condition thru condition type.
    When GR is made for that item error appears as"GL account 2000 9095002 not consistent"
    How to resolve this issue?
    Regards

    hi
    check the GL account for the 9095002 for the company code 2000

  • After REFRESH the cached object is not consistent with the database table

    After REFRESH, the cached object is not consistent with the database table. Why?
    I created a JDBC connection with the Oracle database (HR schema) using JDeveloper(10.1.3) and then I created an offline database (HR schema)
    in JDeveloper from the existing database tables (HR schema). Then I made some updates to the JOBS database table using SQL*Plus.
    Then I returned to the JDeveloper tool and refreshed the HR connection. But I found no any changes made to the offline database table JOBS in
    JDeveloper.
    How to make the JDeveloper's offline tables to be synchronized with the underling database tables?

    qkc,
    Once you create an offline table, it's just a copy of a table definition as of the point in time you brought it in from the database. Refreshing the connection, as you describe it, just refreshes the database browser, and not any offline objects. If you want to syncrhnonize the offline table, right-click the offline table and choose "Generate or Reconcile Objects" to reconcile the object to the database. I just tried this in 10.1.3.3 (not the latest 10.1.3, I know), and it works properly.
    John

  • My iphone 4s voice dictation for text messages is not consistently working. Sometimes it works, other times after the dictation it just gives me a blank space. Anyone else having this problem?

    My iphone 4s voice dictiation for text messages is not consistently working. I've had the phone since Thanksgiving and it always worked perfectly, but the last few weeks it's been hit or miss. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Anyone else having this problem? I tried the hard reset but that hasn't fixed it.

    I have the same problem since updating to IOS 8.3. Any app to which I want to send a new link via IMessage does not allow me to select a contact to send the IMessage to. Using a pre-existing thread does not have same problem.

  • When trying to update, I get the message: Account not in this store,...switch to the Canadian store.  How do I do that?

    When trying to update apps, I get the message:  "Account not in this store,...switch to the Canadian store before purchasing"  How to I switch, and how did it even get changed to US store?  I don't remember changing anything, and I used to be able to update, no problem..  I have synced with my computer for music - could it have happened then?  I changed on the computer to Cdn site, but will it not go to the iPhone automatically?

    On you iPhone go to settings-iTunes &amp; AppStore.
    Tap user name, sign out.
    Log back in with your apple ID and password.
    That should fix the problem

  • Whenever I updated or downloaded a new app from the App Store, a message appears saying:   "Account Not In This Store Your account is not valid for use in the U.S. store. You must switch to the Swedish. store before purchasing."   I made some research onl

    Whenever I updated or downloaded a new app from the App Store, a message appears saying:
    "Account Not In This Store
    Your account is not valid for use in the U.S. store. You must switch to the Swedish. store before purchasing."
    I made some research online and asked a few of my friends with the same problem. All they did was sign out of iTunes from settings>iTunes & App Stores or from the App Store itself and signed back in. It worked for many of them but not with my iPhone 4s. It really does get on my nerves to always sign out and back in to the App Store as it sometimes works and allows me to update and download or most of the time it doesnt.
    When viewing my Apple ID account on my iPhone (after entering the password) it either views my account or says:
    "This Apple ID is only valid for purchases in the U.S. iTunes Store. You will be switched to that Store. Try your purchase again."
    So I press on OK then either switches me to the App Store app of its choice, or says "Cannot connect to iTunes Store".
    I tried restoring iOS6 hoping it was a bad installation, but i still have the same problem.
    Can anyone help me please?
    Arian

    Are you sure your AppleID is NOT tied to the US store? If you are trying to buy an app from the Swedish store you will be unable to do that. Some apps are only available on certain stores. That is why you get the "Cannot connect to the iTunes store" message when trying to buy that app. Your updates are being done from the US store ; thats why you can update sometimes and sometimes not.
    If you keep encountering problems contact iTunes support. They will help you sort it out.

  • Why do I get the message when I try to purchase an app or song on itunes using my iPhone5? "Account Not In This Store. Your account is not valid for use in the U.S. store. You must switch to the New Zealand store before purchasing."

    When I try to buy either an app or a song via iTunes, I have just started getting the following message and I am unable to change the store location. "Account Not In This Store. Your account is not valid for use in the U.S. store. You must switch to the New Zealand store before purchasing."
    This problem has only just started happening. I am on an iPhone5 iOS 7.0.4.
    Very frustrating. Can someone please tell me why & where the change has occured and how to fix it? In the past I have purchased many apps and songs on itunes and never had this problem.
    Thanks a mill :-)

    Click here and follow the instructions to change the iTunes Store country.
    (97125)

  • Airport Extreme Not Consistently Assigning DHCP

    I am using a relatively new (within the last year) Airport Extreme as the primary router on my home network.  Connected directly to the router is a GigE switch, an AT&T Microcell, and another router - an Aruba RAP which creates a secure VPN for my home/remote office network.  The connection to my Apple desktop is made through the GigE switch, as are three additional wired connections to other devices in my home, including two Apple TV's and (hopefully) two Airport Expresses.  
    I recently discovered when trying to configure a new Airport Express to extend my wireless network over ethernet (roaiming network) that my Airport extreme is not consistently assigning the IP addresses within it's defined DHCP range (10.0.1.0 - 10.0.1.200).  About half of the time devices on the network are getting a default 169.254.x.x IP address, which (in the case of my desktop) results in an 'self assigned IP' error within the network settings.  I can reboot my apple desktop and the next time it gets a correct 10.0.1.1 address.  Reboot again, it defaults back to a 169 address - and so on. It doesnt seem to make any difference if I connect my desktop directly to the Extreme, or, if I connect it through the GigE switch.  And, every time I get a 'self assigned IP' I have no connectivity beyond the Extreme (no internet), and I'm forced to use my wireless/Airport connection.
    Another problem here is that the Expresses both expect to receive 10.x IP addresses and when they don't get one, they basically become pretty $100 paperweights when connected over ethernet. Also, if you try to configure a new Express without the 10.x address it expects to be assigned (and defaults to a 169.x), the Airport Utility will no longer 'find' the Express once the Express auto-restarts and the update will fail.  I learned this after spending two hours on the phone with Apple support yesterday - during which they were able to get my first generation Express configured, but, not my 24-hour old second Generation Express, which continues to act only as a paperweight.  Oddly enough, everything works perfectly well if I use only wireless connections to the Extreme - there are no IP problems and everything works correctly.  Unfortunately, I want to use wired connections for all my devices (expresses, Apple TV's) because we stream alot of audio and video.     
    Is my Extreme not working correctly?  Does anyone think it's problematic to have a second router (the Aruba) connected behind the Extreme?  I suppose I could force some components to use only specific IP's, but, that sounds like a pain.  If the Aruba is problematic, I would also consider a second internet connection, or, finding some way to split home IP traffic vs work IP traffic. 
    Thoughts?

    I've been doing some research and it appears the 'self assigned IP' address is a common problem in the Apple support community.  And, for what it's worth, it appears an inability to isolate or accurately troubleshoot the problem - by users or Apple tech support - is a recurring theme.  I totally understand that no two home networks are exactly alike (different ISPs, switches, configurations, etc.), but, after being a die-hard PC user for my entire life I can honestly say I never encountered anything like this while using my PC.  I'm not about to trash my Mac, but, the Apple 'ease of use' selling point is quickly losing it's lustre.
    I got into this mess because I added a GigE switch to my network.  Rather than buy a different switch (a tactic which assumes my problems are being caused by the switch) I'm inclined to buy another Airport Extreme and try daisy-chaining them together to overcome the reason I bought the GigE switch in the first place, which is not enough ethernet ports on the Extreme.  That, or I'll spend a weekend in my attic re-wiring my home network to daisy-chain my two Express devices together instead of requiring individual connections to my router.  My experience with Apple hardware thus far is that it prefers to 'play nice' with other Apple hardware over non-Apple hardware.  It could be $100 error on my end (or, a weekend of not doing yardwork), but, I think it's the best shot.  Other possible fixes, including manually assigned IP-addresses, put too much emphasis on software and network configuration - which (by my non-scentific analysis), are two areas even harder to troubleshoot. 
    I'll let you know how it goes. 
    Mh
    Post Script - Dear Apple: please find a way to significantly increase the number of ethernet ports on your Airport Extreme Router.  Thank you. 

  • How to clear line items in accounts not managed on an open item basis

    We are getting ready to archive FI accounting documents from years 1993-2002.  We encountered a great deal of documents that did not archive during testing because the documents have open items.  We were given bad advice in the beginning on how to set up accounts. Several accounts were not set up on an open item basis and these accounts will not get archived until the line items are cleared. We have set up new accounts to replace these accounts that are now being managed on an open item basis. Our FI users are unable to clear the documents using F-03. Does anyone have a way of clearing these type of documents (not managed on an open item basis)?  Thank you in advance.

    One of our users has proven that the line items on GL accounts not managed on an open item basis are not holding up the archiving. The reason for many documents not archiving is that the item posted to the vendor is still open.
    thanks!

  • Error : Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and U1 exci

    I have Created Impot PO, After Planned Delivery cost MIRO I am trying to Perform GR then its giving Error "Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and U1 excise group
    Message no. 8I402"
          I have already maintained GL account in "Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction" for Excise group U1
          This problem is coming when Additional Duty on custom condition type JADC is maintained in "Maintain Excise Defaults" node in the column "ADC Cond" . If I remove JADC condition type from this place the this error is not coming but AED column is not fetching any value while doing GR.
    Please help me in this issue , still No answer
    Edited by: shiwanshu singh on Jan 28, 2009 10:26 AM

    Dear sir
    For GRPO have you maintained sub transaction Type IP for your excise group U1. If you not maintained pl maintain . and assign G/L account to modvat clearing account , the G/l account should be same as company code CVD account.
    Regards
    jrp

  • Excise modvat accounts not defined for EWPO

    Dear Experts,
    when I click on 'Balance Choose' tab in J1IIN, it is showing an error message "Excise modvat accounts not defined for EWPO transaction and 60 excise group.Message no. 8I402" though I have maintain 'Excise account assignment table'  in "Tax on goods movement>India>account determination>specify G/L accounts per excise transaction". I searched in that forum, but I didnt get no proper solution.

    Hi
    Check your entries
    'Excise account assignment table' in "Tax on goods movement>India>account determination>specify G/L accounts per excise transaction
    EWPO          CR Credit     CLEAR CENVAT clearing account
    EWPO          DR Debit     RG23AED RG 23 AED account
    EWPO          DR Debit     RG23AT1 RG 23 AT1 Account
    EWPO          DR Debit     RG23BED RG 23 BED account
    EWPO          DR Debit     RG23ECS RG 23 ECS Account
    EWPO          DR Debit     RG23SED RG 23 SED account
    regards
    Prashanth
    Edited by: Prashanth@SD on Apr 12, 2011 2:00 PM

Maybe you are looking for