GL Line Item with Tax Base Amount Posting

Dear Expert,
I have a GL account with tax and CO object. And, I am using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST to do the GL posting. I would like to post the GL line item with tax base amount as it will show in FB03 line item, the posting is successful but no base amount is in GL line item in FB03. (I can manually post it in Tcode FB50).
Any idea on this and what is the problem? Appreciate if can help..
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Weng

Hello Weng,
I also looked on SAP notes.
There is a note with much information about Tax Postings with accounting BAPIs and it's a consulting note. The note number is 626235.
Regards,
Rae Ellen Woytowiez
Edited by: Rae Ellen Woytowiez on Dec 21, 2010 10:11 PM

Similar Messages

Report for G/L line items with both debit & credit posting accounts

Hi,
My client requires a G/L line items report. It can be possible thru fs10n or fbl3n etc. But he wants to see both the credit and debit accounts in the same line.
for ex: if I open a expense account and show the report of individual documents, he wants to see the corresponding credit item to which bank/cash account it got credited to.
we showed them to double click on that document and goto document overview. but they dont want in that way.
they want to see all the line items with both postings in the same sheet for all line items.
valuable replies will be fairly rewarded.
thanks,
chaitanya

Hi,
U can use the following TCodes...
- S_ALR_87012287
- S_ALR_87012289
- S_ALR_87012291
But i am not sure if your client will be happy...
This is a very common req and the only solution possible is to have a customized report for the client..
Hope its clear..
Cheers
Raghu

With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Dear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15%   = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar

You are posting directly to a tax account. Enter the tax base amounts per i

Hi Team,
While posting JV againset to tax GL account we are getting bellow error message
""""Enter the tax base amounts for account 351200 in company code 1111
Message no. F5A375
Diagnosis
You are posting directly to a tax account. Enter the tax base amounts per item using the function "Tax Amounts" """.
Could any body let me know why we are not able to post JV to against Tax GL account...
Thanks
Vyshnava

Hi Satish,
Yes , I am posting JV to do zero balance to this tax GL account to Changing the tax code from " > Output Tax Account" to " * All tax types allowed "..
Thanks
Vyshnava

Generate 2 line items with posting keys in same table while using FM .

Dear Expert ,
For T-code f-65 ,I have to park a FI Document .i tried with PRELIMINARY_POSTING_FB01 for parked Document . But i am not successfully park the document .
with the help of F-65 the data Segregate between Tables VBSEGS and VBSEGD with respecting Posting key . but with this Fm entire entry is displaying in table VBSEGS .For example it generated two line items with posting keys '15' and '40' and these both are displayed in VBSEGS whereas posting key '15' has to be displayed in VBSEGD.
when i check this Document in FBV0 Error reflect " G/L Account 0012000 1001 Does not Exist ".
Here my code -
DATA:   XT_BKPF LIKE BKPF OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEG LIKE BSEG OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEG1 LIKE BSEG OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEC LIKE BSEC OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSET LIKE BSET OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEZ LIKE BSEZ OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BKORM LIKE BKORM OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_THEAD LIKE THEAD OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_SPLTTAB LIKE ACSPLT OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_SPLTWT LIKE WITH_ITEMX OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE .
DATA :    XTEXT_UPDATE LIKE BOOLE-BOOLE VALUE SPACE,
          XTEXT_ITEM_UPDATE LIKE BOOLE-BOOLE VALUE SPACE,
          XI_UF05A LIKE UF05A,
          XI_XCMPL TYPE XFELD VALUE 'X',
          XFS006_FB01 LIKE FS006 ,
          XI_TCODE LIKE T020-TCODE VALUE 'F-65',
          XI_PARGB LIKE RF05A-PARGB        ,
          XI_TCODE_INT TYPE TCODE           .
DATA P_RETURN LIKE BAPIRET2 OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
XT_BKPF-BUKRS     =     'CP01'.
XT_BKPF-GJAHR     =     2011.
XT_BKPF-BLART     =     'DZ'.
XT_BKPF-BLDAT     =     SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-BUDAT     =     SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-MONAT     =     '06'.
XT_BKPF-CPUDT     =     SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-WWERT     = SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-USNAM     =     'ABAPER'.
XT_BKPF-TCODE     =     'F-65'.
APPEND XT_BKPF.
XT_BSEG-BUKRS     =     'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-GJAHR     =     '2011'.
XT_BSEG-BUZEI = '001'.
XT_BSEG-BSCHL = '40'.
XT_BSEG-KOART = 'S'.
XT_BSEG-SHKZG = 'S' .
XT_BSEG-GSBER     =     'CPLN'.
XT_BSEG-BUPLA = 'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-WRBTR     =     10000.
XT_BSEG-PSWSL = 'INR'.
XT_BSEG-ZUONR = 'CH. 123456'.
XT_BSEG-HKONT = '241000'.
APPEND XT_BSEG .
CLEAR XT_BSEG.
Vendor line item - required even for header only - BSEG table
XT_BSEG-BUKRS     =     'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-GJAHR     =     '2011'.
XT_BSEG-BUZEI = '002'.
XT_BSEG-BSCHL = '15'.
XT_BSEG-KOART = 'S'.
XT_BSEG-SHKZG = 'H' .
XT_BSEG-GSBER     =     'CPLN'.
XT_BSEG-BUPLA = 'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-WRBTR     =     10000.
XT_BSEG-PSWSL = 'INR'.
XT_BSEG-ZUONR = 'CH. 123456'.
XT_BSEG-HKONT = 'PC04000001'.
APPEND XT_BSEG .
CLEAR XT_BSEG.
CALL FUNCTION 'PRELIMINARY_POSTING_FB01'
   EXPORTING
     TEXT_UPDATE            = XTEXT_UPDATE
     TEXT_ITEM_UPDATE       = XTEXT_ITEM_UPDATE
I_UF05A                =
     I_XCMPL                = XI_XCMPL
FS006_FB01             =
      I_TCODE                = XI_TCODE
I_PARGB                =
I_TCODE_INT            =
IMPORTING
    XEPBBP                 = CHECK_A
    TABLES
      T_BKPF                 = XT_BKPF
      T_BSEG                 = XT_BSEG
      T_BSEC                 = XT_BSEC
      T_BSET                 = XT_BSET
      T_BSEZ                 = XT_BSEZ
T_BKORM                =
T_THEAD                =
T_SPLTTAB              =
T_SPLTWT               =
          EXCEPTIONS
            ERROR_MESSAGE = 1.
P_RETURN-ID         = SY-MSGID.
P_RETURN-TYPE       = SY-MSGTY.
P_RETURN-NUMBER     = SY-MSGNO.
APPEND P_RETURN.
     p_return-MESSAGE_V1 = XSYMSGV.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
      EXPORTING
        WAIT = 'X'.
ENDIF.
WRITE :/ sy-subrc , sy-MSGV1 .
Thanks ,
Ashish Gupta

Hi Raghuram,
I found a very important SAP Note 103051, details are below.
An IDoc processed by function module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MM (of category INVOIC01) must not refer to the same purchase order item in several invoice items. This is also valid if for a goods receipt-related invoice verification several delivery notes belong to the same purchase order item.
Depending on the system settings and the situation, various error messages can occur (for example, FD240 'Order item ... selected more than once' or M8050 'Balance not zero: & debits: & credits: &').
In this situation module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM generates error message M8321 'Document contains same order item more than once'.
For example, this situation occurs if you work with individual batch valuation and the SD billing document executes a batch split for different batches which belong to the same purchase order item and delivery.
Other terms
INVOIC, SAPLIEDI, M8047, M8, 321
Reason and Prerequisites
This is because of the program design.
Solution
There is no solution for IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MM.
Module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM (only as of Release 4.0) for the logistics invoice verification can distinguish different goods receipts by means of the delivery note number. For this purpose, GR-related invoice verification must be active.
Owing to this symptom, billing documents for single batch valuation with batch split cannot be settled in MM-EDI inbound processing. The settlement generates exactly the situation described (several invoice items for the same purchase order item). In this case, the only solution is to deactivate the billing of the batch sub-items in SD Customizing and to calculate the main item only.
Hope this helps.
Reward if helpful.
Thanks

Unable to Change Withholding Tax Base Amount while creating Service AP Invoice through DI API?

Dear All,
I am trying to create Service AP Invoice through DI API.
If I post the document without changing SAPPurchaseInvoice.WithholdingTaxData.TaxableAmount the dount ocument is created in SAP without any problem.
But if I change amount in above field then DI API throws error Unbalanced Transaction.
If I post same document in SAP with changed base amount it got posted in SAP without any Issue.
Where I am doing wrong?
please guide.
Using:
SAP B1 version 9 Patch Level 11
Location : India.
Thanks.

Hi ,
maybe you can find solution to these note 1812344
1846344 - Overview Note for SAP Business One 8.82 PL12
Symptom
This SAP Note contains collective information related to upgrades to SAP Business One 8.82 Patch Level 12 (B1 8.82 PL12) from previous SAP Business One releases.
In order to receive information about delivered patches via email or RSS, please use the upper right subscription options on http://service.sap.com/~sapidp/011000358700001458732008E
Solution
Patch installation options:
SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 can be installed directly on previous patches of SAP Business One 8.82
You can upgrade your SAP Business One to 8.82PL12 from all patches of the following versions:8.81; 8.8; 2007 A SP01; 2007 A SP00; 2007 B SP00; 2005 A SP01; 2005 B
Patch content:
SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 includes all corrections from previous patches for releases 8.82, 8.81, 8.8, 2007, and 2005.
For details about the contained corrections, please see the SAP Notes listed in the References section.
Notes: SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 contains B1if version 1.17.5
Patch download:
Open http://service.sap.com/sbo-swcenter -> SAP Business One Products -> Updates -> SAP Business One 8.8 -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Comprised Software Component Versions -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Win32 -> Downloads tab
Header Data
Released On
02.05.2013 02:34:18
Release Status
Released for Customer
Component
SBO-BC-UPG Upgrade
Priority
Recommendations/additional info
Category
Upgrade information
References
This document refers to:
SAP Business One Notes
1482452
IN_Wrong tax amount was created for some items in the invoice with Excisable BOM item involves
1650289
Printing Inventory Posting List for huge amount of data
1678528
Withholding amount in the first row is zeroed.
1754529
Error Message When Running Pick and Pack Manager
1756263
Open Items List shuts down on out of memory
1757641
Year-end closing
1757690
SEPA File Formats - New Pain Versions
1757898
Incoming Bank File Format
1757904
Outgoing Bank File Format
1762860
Incorrect weight calculation when Automatic Availability Check is on
1770690
Pro Forma Invoice
1776948
Calendar columns are wrong when working with Group View
1780460
OINM column description is not translated
1780486
UI_System crash when you set extreme value of double type to DataTable column
1788256
Incorrect User-Defined Field displayed in a Stock Transfer Request
1788372
ZH: 'Unacceptable Field' when export document to word
1788818
RU loc: No freight in the Tax Invoice layout
1790404
Cash Flow Inconsistency when Canceling Payment
1791295
B1info property of UI API AddonsInstaller object returns NULL value
1791416
Adding a new item to BoM is slow
1794111
Text is overlapping in specific localization
1795595
Change log for item group shows current system date in all the "Created" fields
1797292
Queries in alerts should support more query results
1800055
B1if_ Line break issue in inbound retrieval using JDBC
1802580
Add Journal Voucher to General Ledger report
1803586
Not realized payment is exported via Payment Engine using 'SAPBPDEOPBT_DTAUS' file format
1803751
Period indicator of document series can be changed although it has been used
1804340
LOC_BR_Cannot update Nota Fiscal Model
1805554
G/L Account displayed in a wrong position when unticking the checkbox "Account with Balance of Zero"
1806576
Payment Cannot Be Reconciled Internally
1807611
Cannot update UDF in Distribution Rule used in transactions
1807654
Serial No./Batch inconsistency by canceled Inventory Transfer
1808694
BR: Business Partner Code cannot be updated with CNPJ CPF error
1809398
CR_Cannot Display Related Multi-Value Parameters
1809758
Arrow key not work for Batch/Serial Number Transactions Report
1810099
Tax Amount is Recalculated Even if Tax Code Is Not Changed
1811270
Upgrade fails on Serial And Batches object with error code -10
1811846
Cannot run Exchange Rate Differences when multi branch is activated
1812344
Withholding Tax Amount Is Not Updated in Payment Once Witholding Tax Code Is Changed in Document through DI API
1812740
DI:"Operation Code" show wrong value when add "A/P Tax Invoice" based on "A/P Invoice"
1813029
US_Vendor address on 1099 Summary by Form/Box Report is not updated according to the latest Invoice
1813835
Wrong amounts of Goods Return in Open Item List
1814207
Preliminary page prints setting does not keep after upgrade
1814860
Value "Zero" cannot be imported to "Minimum Inventory Level" field via Excel file
1815535
RFQ: Web front end not displayed in supplier language
1815810
GT: Adding Incoming Payment for Some Cash Flow Relevant Accounts Fails
1816191
BR:System Crashes While Working with Tax Code Determination Window
1816611
CR_Crystal Report Displayed Incorrectly Afte

Changing Withholding tax base amount- 1099 invoice

Hi Friends,
Need your help again.
Using T. Code FB09, i can change WHT base as long as the invoice is not cleared. However, how to change WHT base where a particular invoice has been cleared?
I have actually made some cchanges to configuration where by i have removed tick for 'line item not cleared'. Ideally with this setting it should allow me to change to WHT base. But the same is not happening.
Can any one help me out with any other steps that are involved.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Rajanikanth

Hi Rajanikant,
Please review note 363650 here you will see the following
information;
C) Change Rules for classical and extended withholding tax
      If the withholding tax base amount should be changed after a
      docment has been paid already, the following steps are required:
      For Classical Withholding Tax and only if the withholding tax
     amount is zero.
     Change of withholding tax base amount or withholding tax code of a
     cleared invoice.
     If the withholding tax base amount and/or the withholding tax code
     needs to be changed after an invoice has been cleared please follow
     steps;
As you see from the above information the following quotation "only if
the withholding tax amount is zero".
If a withholding tax amount other than zero has been posted, you cannot
change the values via transaction FB02.
Please also review the IMG documentation for transaction OB32 via
spro -> Financial accounting -> Financial accounting global settings
-> Document -> Line item -> Document change rules, line item.
here you will see the following information;
Document Change Rules, Line Item
In this activity, you determine under which circumstances fields within
posted documents can be changed.
Note
For a number of fields, the system itself determines that they can no
longer be changed after posting. This includes all fields which are
central to the principles of orderly accounting, for example, the amount
posted and the account.
The system also prevents the update objects from being changed in
documents which have already been posted, independent of the document
change rules
Thus as you can see from the above description if an amount has been
posted to the account you cannot change the fields despite entering in
the field in OB32 as changable.
with kind regards
Cora

Tax Base Amount calculated wrongly

Dear Friends,
While posting a MIRO with a manually enter tax base amount, the amount doubles whenever I click on another tab like basic data and come back to tac base amount.
For e.g. I have a PO for 10000, now I am posting an invoice for the same but I have to pay only 9000 to the vendor because 1000 has been deducted as a penalty for late delivery.
Now I enter a MIRO, with reference to the purchase order and enter 9000 in the line item and trying to enter 10000 in the field Tax Base amount under the Tax tab.
Now whenever I change tabs, i.e if I go to Basic data and come back to Tax Tab, the amount has been changed to 19000. If change tabs again, it changes to 28000 and so on...
Not sure if this is a bug or has anyone faced this issue? Can anyone suggest a note or a solution...
Thanks,
Hari Dharen

Thank you Mani Kumar,
But that's what we already have in customizing:
The problem is that during Invoice Verification (MIRO) we specified that only one of the items is eligible to Cash Discount (we set for item #2 that it is W/o Cash Discount):
The invoice is posting correctly identifying the correct disc. amount of 1,500 (50,000*3%):
The problem is during the Payment Run where the system determines a Cash Discount that applies but when calculating the W/Tax Base Amount it do the following:
51,000*3% = 1,530
W/Tax Base = 51,000 - 1,530 = 49,470 usd
F110 Proposal generated:
It is false that the Cash Discount applies to all items, the expected result should be:
(only eligible items for Cash Discount) 50,000*3% = 1,500
W/Tax Base = 51,000 - 1,500 = 49,500 usd not 49,470
Thanks

BSET-HWBAS Tax Base Amount is wrong / double

Dear Experts,
We have a scenario where in IDOC comes from External system to SAP for posting. We are using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST for doing the postings. I have nearly passed all the necessary parameters but still the Tax base amount in BSET is wrong. And it happens only for one tax code only.
I have passed the GL Account details, Currency amount and Tax amount details. For each tax line I am also filling the the relevant item number i.e. BAPIACTX09-ITEMNO_TAX.
Can you please suggest solution for this issue. I have tried to serach SAP notes + SDN post but could not get suitable solution.
The current issue is as follows:
40200001 AB      103,11- (i.e. 20% tax)
75003000 VN       90,00-   (i.e. 10% tax)
34000000 AB       20,62-   (i.e. tax calculated). Here I have entered only the tax items. The currency balance with other entries is zero.
But when I have a look at Environment--> Tax Data then it shows Tax Base amount for "AB" as 206.22 (i.e. 1033.11 x 2). The tax base amount for VN is right as 90.
Kindly advise.
-Abhishek

Solved by myself.
Refer SAP Note 626235 for details. The Tax by-pass for BKPF-AWTYP was switched off. This customization is maintained in table TAX_APPLI.

Changing Withholding tax base amount- 1099 payment

The scenario is:
Classic withholding tax functionality to be used for first time, the configuration was done last year.
1099 needs to be printed with all payments made out to the vendor.
There were payments made out to the Vendor in year 2011. There are some payments that show as WT exempt amount in RC and other payments are displayed as WT base amount in RC while running RFIDYYWT or 1099 print out report.
I used RFWT0020 program to regenerate the WT and Change to source tax code. It just updates the tax code on the payment document but is not changing the payment document amount from WT exempt to WTax base.
So the 1099 printout is not showing the total payments made, it is excluding WT exempt amount in total.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Edited by: Gary_S321 on Jan 11, 2012 10:30 PM

Rebecca,
You need to update the WTax base amount field on all the payment documents that are blank.
For that just go to Vendor line item report FBL1n and run it for all the 1099 vendors. Change the layput to add WT base amount and WT Code in the report output. Filter the documennt type with payment doc types ZP and KZ and WTax base amount zero.
Extract these transactions into excel and then write LSMW to mass update these tax base amount field.
To update only Tax code on these transaction you can use RFWT0020 program.
Hope this helps.
Thanks

Clarification on tax base amount

Hello SAP Gurus
I need some clarification on tax base amount.
when we make PO, there is a base amount of material and has excise conditions. now when we do MIGO with capture & post excise, one excise tab comes in item details, which shows all the duty values and tax base amount.
is this base amount & duties in MIGO are coming from PO?
if i change tax base amount and duties values in MIGO, what will be the impact?
if i change only duty values not tax base amount in MIGO, what will be the impact?
when we do MIRO, system proposes amount from PO, when we simulate, from where the excise duty values are flowing from PO or MIGO?
in MIRO screen, does system calculate the duties based on the amount coming in MIRO or it picks data from MIGO?
i need above clarification because i am not able to post vendor invoices during MIRO, system shows "The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base". this is happening, when we are posting over value vendor invoices.
during MIGO, in some case duty values have been changed keeping tax base amount as per PO, in some case tax base amount and duty values both have been changed based on vendor invoice. pl help.
thanks & regards'

Hi
I have already done that in VKOA, accounting document showing tax code, tax amount, GL account except Base amount.
Best Regards
Swami

Consignment and Tax Base Amount

All,
We are getting the error "the tax amount must not be greater than the tax base".   When doing a trace the Tax Base Amount is ZERO.   Can someone tell me where/how the tax base amount is determined?
Thank you,
Sandra

What I have found so far is the system calculates the base amount by adding the line items that have a tax code associated with it. In the scenario I have it appears the tax code is not associated with any of the items on the settlement and therefore the tax base = 0.
This is SAP standard transaction MRKO in a 4.5B system.   The info record has a tax code on it and it does not appear to matter which tax code in on the info record.
Anyone have any ideas on where I can look or what to look for?    Is this a tax set up issue? Is it a program error?   I've tried to find all the tax configuration and compare with a working example in the same system but have not been successful. I've also looked in OSS and there are several OSS notes that are remotely related to consignment and taxes but we are on a fairly high hotpack # so .... just not sure where to go.
Thanks for any suggestions.
Sandra

Separate line item for taxes in accounting document of MIGO

All SAP Gurus,
As we can have separate line item for Freight amount (Freight amt credited) in accounting document for MIGO.
Similarly is it possible to have separate line item for tax amount which is inventoried.
Regards,

Hi Rajan,
Freight is from pricing procedure whereas tax is from taxing procedure.
Tax cannot be shown in separate g/l in MIGO.
Reason:
If u wanna show tax as separate item then we need to debit tax a/c in migo as well as it has to go to inventory which is not possible(double accounting enrty on debit side).
I too tried to do the same by specifying 2 for posting indicator and selecting non deductible for the nonsetoff account key used in the taxing proceudre in OBCN but it is behaving like setoff tax.
U can also try doing the same and then check.
Reg
Raja

Seperate Line item for taxes in MIGO and MIRO

All SAP Gurus,
We want to inventories the CST (central sales tax) amount.
For this we have used the condition type JIPS, check marked the accounting key 'JI7' and gave posting indicator as '2' Separate line item.
Now, CST amount is getting inventorised at the time of GR. (but no separate line item is created at the time of GR).
During MIRO, the inventoried CST amount is getting deinventorised (although separate line item being created here).
Can we have separate line item in MIRO, without getting value deinventorised? (as it happens for freight)
Regards,

Hi Kunal,
Thanks for the reply.
As you have rightly said, we need to tick 'NOT DEDUCTIBLE' in OBCN (we have already did that).
And key has been already assigned in Atx procedure for the appropriate condition type.
But the problem is that, we want separate line item for this tax amount in MIGO.
Is it possible to have separate line item for the tax amount in MIGO (as we can get separate line item for freight in MIGO).
Regards,

LSMW RFBIBL00 withholding tax base amount in local currency cannot be updated by manual

Hi SAP Guru,
When I try to upload FI docs by program RFBIBL00 in LSMW, the field BWITH-WT_QSSHH(withholding tax base amount in local currency) cannot be updated.
(1) The LSMW structure is defined as bellow:
     BGR00<--------DOC_HEAD
          BBKPF<--------DOC_HEAD
               BBSEG<--------DOC_ITEM
                    BWITH <--------DOC_WHTX
And fields in structure BWITH are defined as bellow:
Field Name
Type
Length
Field Description
STYPE
C
1
Batch Input Interface Record Type
WITHT
C
2
Withholding tax type
WT_WITHCD
C
2
Withholding tax type
WT_QSSHB
C
21
W/tax base amount in document currency (batch input
field)
WT_QSSHH
C
21
W/tax base amount in Local currency (batch input
field)
(2) When I run LSMW, the doc can be posted successfully. All the information can be updated as the data I upload. Only the field WT_QSSHH is calculated by system automatically according to the current foreign exchange rate.
(3) When I try to post this doc by manual(F-02), the field WT_QSSHH is not editable.
How can I change the field WT_QSSHH into editable and update this field in LSMW RFBIBL00.
Thank you very much!
Eric

Hi Nikitha,
I tried posting an invoice in currency other then co. code currency, but the WT amount is getting calculated perfectly.
also checked vendor with foreign curr recon account. the WT is working for that also
Can you please share the screen shot of the transaction where after changing currency you are not getting the values picked up for WT
May be i have not understood your questions
Regards
Pragya

GL Line Item with Tax Base Amount Posting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for