GL Posting effects consolidation

Do FI posting effects consolidation right away if yes, how?

Dear Saleema,
Yes It is true that each and every postings affects the company code which is a consolidation unit in a consolidation. There is a seperate 'SEM-BCS' forum to learn more about this wonderful and most wanted module.
Trust this helps much and answers to your query!
Regards,
Ashok SINGH

Similar Messages

FI Documents not posted in consolidation

Hi All,
We have a issue where once the FI documents are posted, the consolidation documents are not created. I have checked customizing settings and realtime update is checked. We also dont receive any error message for realtime update.
Also, when i run CXNR or CXNX to reconcile between general ledger and consolidation ledger, it shows there are reconciliation differences
Any help would be appreciated.

We had the same issue in our company as soon as we started fiscal year 2011. I logged a ticket with SAP and they directed me to table TRWCA. See Note 601700.
In your system TRWA may look like this:
400 ECCS 2010 X
400 ECCS 2999
400 ECCS 9999 X
Use SM30 to add a tick beside 2999, and the documents will start posting to ECCS again. Use CXNM to post the documents that were not posted to ECCS.
Hope this helps.

F-04 posting error - Consolidated companies

Dear all,
I have a error message for a particular customer while posting using T Code - F-04, I got an error message saying - " Consolidated Companies XXXX & "" are different.
Samunder Singh

HI,
Can u explain the Scenerio for which your working, whether ur using Cosolidation for all company codes.
Regards,
Sreekanth

Routing audio from softsynth post-effects

Hi, i'm a seasoned Logic Pro7 and now Pro8 user but this one thing has got me stumped.
Is there a way to route the audio from my esx24 to an audio track within Logic.
I know I could just send it out and record it back in. But that's just plain fiddly with quality loss. I'd rather there be a cable free way to do it.
Any help?
Cheers.
Robbie

Yes this is true, you can export the track, then reimport that audio. Or solo, bounce, and import the audio. But no way to actually record within Logic 7. Nice feature to have added in 8, I'm looking forward to that...

PL30 -Posting Balancing issue for postings across consolidation groups

Hi All
Greeting for the Day
We have implemented PL30 Upload for consolidation groups ,User is trying to post cross consolidation Groups as per one sample file with fields in the order mentioned below
100     2009     09
Cons Group/Doc type/C/i Activity/company/FS Item/movement type//investee company/Period value in GC
GABCD     301     05     ABCD     11610C     125          IJKL     -500
GWXYZ     301     05     EFGH     60102C     125          EFGH     500
now ABCD& EFGH belong to alotgether different consolidation groups GABCD & GWXYZ ,so while doing a flexi upload of the same system throws error
as below
Balance sheet/income statement balance 500,00 EUR
Message no. UCD1011
Diagnosis
The document to be posted is not completely in balance.
Entries involving items of the balance sheet or the income statement must always have a zero balance to ensure that both the balance sheet and the income statement are balanced, respectively. This is not true in this case.
System Response
Entry cannot be posted.
Procedure
Correct the amounts for the balance sheet items and/or income statement items.
So our understanding of the same is that for this kind of entry to balance at Legal entity level we need to have an offsetting account entry created on the flexi upload file
But want to know if there is any automatic way of doing the same without making users enter an offsetting entry
ANy other suggestions are welcome as well as there are lot of manual postings at this time which are time consuming so we want to cut it down by using Flexi upload
Rgds
Dheeraj

We have agreed with client on getting an offsetting account posting in the Flexi upload file
as nothing else works as it was against the accounting bit
Rgds
Dheeraj

Customer Statement with Consolidating BP

If Invoice is posted to Customer who is attached to a Consolidating BP, posting of Invoice is posted to Consolidating BP only and Customer Statement does not show this Invoice for the specific Customer BP except appear in the name of Consolidating BP even if the link to Consolidating BP is removed subsequently. New posting of Invoice to Customer after removing Consolidating BP will be posted to specific Customer but not reflected in Consolidating BP. This has been acknowledged by SAP as a limitation as most payments received is usually payable to Consolidating BP for all related Customers.
Kedalene Chong

Hi Peter
I think there is some misunderstanding as this message is different from the one about Currency.
We need to be able to print Customer Statement by both Consolidate BP and specific Customers related to the same Consolidate BP. Please refer to SAP Message 690264/2007
Kedalene Chong

How to fill empty business area in posted documents?

Hi SAP Team,
My Client need to fill the field "business area" for documents already posted. However, today all posted documents, have a rule + validation or substitution for this field.- fill business area to be filled in. For year 2013, my client want to re-assign business area at balance sheet accounts but the problem is how to that at customers, vendors account that are reconciliation accounts. Do you have any sugestion?
For balance accounts, for eg:, if my total in a gl bank account is in debit (no business area at this gl account level), my client idea is to credit that bank account without business area and debit it again but filling the business area. For Customers/Vendors, is not that easy because that gl account does not allow directed posting.
Do you have suggestion to handle this?
Thanks a lot,
Kind regards
Antónia Farias

For vendor / customer postings you have to create reconiliation account wise dummy sub ledgers.
E.g. 1.You have 3 recon. a/c's for customers then you cretae 3 dummy customer codes.
       2. Post a consolidated entry using this dummy accounts(one line item with B.A and the second
           line ietm without B.A)
       3. So at any point of time these subledgers should have zero balance.
       4. Please block these sub-ledgers once your postings have been finished.
Rgds
MBN.

Get output of layer after applied effects and transformations?

I know I can get the pixel data of a layer either by calling Sampling8Suite1()->subpixel_sample() or by directly acessing the layer's data field.
Both methods work fine, but give me only the pixels before any effects or transformations (scaling, rotation, etc.) have been applied on a layer.
Example: I add a red solid and on this red solid I add the effect "Fractal Noise".
On another layer I add my plugin which samples the input of the first layer. But it will never give me the fractal noise output, only the red solid pixels.
DId I miss something somewhere or is this not possible within AE?
Any help appreciated!
Thanks!

in short, no such functionality is offered.
there are however some exceptions:
1. if you checkout your own layer, even at times other than the current, and you do it using the smartFX checkout_layer() funciton, then you get it post all effects previous to yours in the stack.
2. you can checkout any project item, so if you checkout a comp with only one layer in it, you get that layer post transform and effects.
3. write an artisan (the plug-ins that render comps such as "advanced 3D"). artisans get post effects/transform layers.
sorry.
not much good news.

Can anyone explain how to post the manual entries in BCS?

Hi All,
Can anyone explain how to post the manual entries in BCS?

Dear,
Depands on posting level.
There is Manual Posting under Consolidation Functions.
Please creat document and task.
Next you add this task for consolidation monitor. There is "Consolidation Monitor " and you choose Hierarchy task and add your task for manul data.
In document you kind in mind: choose manula posting !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! in page tab Propertis under Posting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
If you would like to entry in posting level 01 or 10, please choose Local currency and trasaction currency +- group currency.
If you would like to entry in posting level 20 or 30, please choose Group currency.
In SEM_BCS are posting level is very important.
Regards,
anka

Depreciation posting only in Asset subledger

Hi,
We have some debit balance in manual acc. depreciation GL(143000), this GL balance we want to post to accumulated depreciation GL (141000) as well as in asset subledger (in asset explorer it should reduce the acc.depreciation).
Ideally the entry should be posted/effected as below.
141000 (FI and AA) Dr.
143000 (only in FI) Cr.
We have tried below solution.
Step1: ABZU (This will effect in FI and AA)
Result: 141000 Dr (Acc. depreciation)
500000 Cr (Depreciation)
Step2: Manual posting in FI
500000 Dr (Depreciation)
143000 Cr (Manual acc. depreciation)
We need to do one more step to post back the depreciation (500000) only in AA which was posted in step1.
Please advice is there any way to post the depreciation only in AA or give me any other solution to transfer the above debit balance to both FI and AA.
Regards
SM

Hi,
Anyone on this, please give me a solution for this.
Regards
SM

Cineware Multipass Problem in After Effects

I'm rendering out a Multipass from Cinema 4DLite. I am using the Cineware PlugIn's option defined Multipass then add layers. When the layers are created in my Comp. I get a message saying "The Cinema 4D file includes Light passes and post effects. Please note that they will not be rendered." What am I doing wrong? The Ambient occlusion and the shadow layer look really bad. I'm trying to complete the lessons in the focal press book Cinema 4D Lite +After Effects and I keep getting this Problem. What is it I'm doing wrong or what is it the book isn't telling me??
Please help. And many thanks in advance, Nick
Oh by the way I'm using the newest CC on an HP z820, but have had exactly the same problem on a Mac book Pro.

Same issue in this thread:
Re: Cineware multi pass not rendering properly.
I've just run into this after updating AE and the latest version of C4D Lite that comes with it, it's utterly ridiculous that this bug has not been fixed yet but apparently it will be in the next Cineware update.......whenever that happens to be. Until then it's back to loooong render times on separate passes and importing them as image sequences :-/

Transfer from one consolidation sub-group to another

Hi,
I wish to transfer a consolidation unit from one sub-group to another. To do this, I know that i need to divest the entity in one sub-group and post first consolidation in another group.
For this, i change the divestiture period in the master of consolidation unit. What are the further steps for posting first acquisition? Should i change the organizational hierarchy (by dragging the consolidation unit from old sub-group to new??
Specifically, the organization structure consists of the following Sub - Groups
CG1
CU - 1000 - Parent Unit
CU - 1100
    CG2
    CU- 2200 - Parent Unit
    CU - 2300
    CU - 2400
            CG3
            CU - 3000 Parent Unit
            CU - 2100
Currently CU 2100 is a 100% subsidiary of CU 3000. .For CG3, consolidation happens at 3000 level and then the results are passed on to CG2. In CG2, the parent unit is 2200 and then the results are passed on to CG1.
In this month, CU-3000 sold it's investments in CU 2100 to CU 2400 (at a profit). There was no goodwill during acquisition of 2100 by 3000.....
I wish to know how i can tackle this in BCS..
Regards,
Shreepati
Edited by: Shreepati Shenoy on Mar 21, 2011 7:34 AM

Thank you for your response!
I read about this in the forum. But i am unable to understand how consolidation unit 2100 can be part of CG3 (with divestiture period) and CG2 (for new acquisition). I tried doing the following in our system -
1) Enter a divestiture period (current period) for CU 2100 in CG3
2) In AFD - I entered First Consolidation data for CU 2400 (which acquired CU 2100 at a profit)u2026
3) When I execute Consolidation Group Changes u2013 Entries are posted only in CG3 (at PL02, 12, 22)..No impact can be seen in CG2..
4) When I execute COI, I get an error which says that investment in 2100 exceeds 100% (i.e. it is 200%)
I tried to drag and drop CU 2100 from CG3 to CG2. However this does not help either (as CU 2100 appears in CG2 only)
Please help me understand if I am going wrong somewhere..

Zoom/blur/chaotic effect for a fighting scene

Hi there! I'm an Italian guy, so I'm SORRY for my really bad english. So, I'm a new user of this amazing forum , and I'm new in the "video making art" too, so I will not too ambicious about making video...BUT I would like to make a promotional video for my airsoft Club...and I thought something like that:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=fRI-2mp8_TU
I want to be clear: I know that this video is at a pro level...but I only want to know few things about it:
1) at 1:05 we can see a this guy face, and a VERY shaking/chaoting shooting with a uninterrupted zoom in/out on the soldier. You can see this effect for the enitre fighting scene, and I think that they are so cool for a shooting/fighting scene! So: those effects have a particoular name or not? Is a particoular video technique or a post production effect?
2) There is any tutorial/video tutorial to make it?

I could be wrong, but it looks like it was shot using what has be called a "shaky cam" teechnique. I dont beleive it is a post effect we are seeing.
One way to replicate this is to use After Effects expressions to create radom motion on several axis'.
And easier alternative is to use a plug in made by Video Copilot called Twitch. It is used in After Effects not Premiere.

Lowest latency soundcard to plug in guitar and play with software effects

Hi,
I know latency is very often discussed, but i am finding it harder to find an answer to what i am looking for. I have a Mac Book Pro and so need an external sound card. I assume firewire is the way to go and firewire 800 should give the lowest latency.
I plan to plug in the guitar directly and then load on software effects. I am switching over from a pc and also haven't made music for a few years so i will have to buy the software modules - probably something like the latest version of amplitube (only because i used the old version 5 years ago and it was great). Then add some etc. delays or limiters etc.
Initially i will use just garageband, but plan to move on to either logic or pro tools if i get back into it properly. Initially, i just want to play along with other songs, but get great real-time effects (as close to as possible). Put it all through headphones and play along etc.
I want to get a sound card that gives me a very low latency (i assume that means going to rme or motu- both of which are very expensive.) I actually am unlikely to use more than 4 ins/outs. Anyone know of a website that actually lists latency or have any real values or other advice. I am not interested in direct monitoring.
Price i am willing to pay is still very variable - if i have to go to one that costs about $2000, then i will save up and wait, but they have so many features i will never touch. Don't play in a band and will never need most of those ins or outs.
The presonus firebox gets mentioned, but i think that is firewire 400 and i am not sure if it's latency is low enough.
Thanks for any help. I am using leopard in case that changes anything.

So to confirm, if i plug a clean electric guitar into the motu ultralite and put it through effects (on either garageband, logic, amplitube etc...), and listen to it post effects, i shouldn't notice too much latency - hopefully close to none at all (i know there is always some latency, but if i can't tell- i don't care).
I might be misunderstanding you, but I thought I'd chime in and clarify a couple of things that sound like you might be misunderstanding slightly. If not, I apologize!
Latency is only a factor when you're recording, not when you're playing stuff back. When you're actually recording into Logic, and trying to play along with a click or a drum track, and even though you're playing at the right time, you're hearing it late and/or it's recording late, that's latency. Most of the time when you're experiencing that, it's not about the interface that you're using (not always, but most of the time), but rather about the effects that you're trying to use when recording. If you're trying to play along to drums, and you have a bunch of processor heavy plug-ins on your project going, you might have to bump up the buffer setting, and that may introduce latency. The key is to keep your effects to a reasonable number when recording, so as to set the buffer low and latency will be manageable. Once you've recorded your guitar, then you can put effects and plugs to your hearts content, increase the buffer size, and everything will play in time. If you really push it, you might cause the audio to drop out, but with what you're doing your machine is plenty fast.
A good interface is always good, and I encourage you to get the best one you can afford (I love my Ultralite!) but it's more about how processor heavy the project is when you're recording. Once tracks are recorded, latency ceases to become a factor.
Get the MOTU, it's a great piece. And don't worry about latency, because you can always disable plugs while recording if they're causing problems, and then put them back once the track is recorded.
On another note, Amplitube 2 is a very nice guitar sim, I think it sounds great. And a lot of people actually like Guitar Amp Pro too, which comes with Logic. You've got options.
Good Luck!

Reparenting - of equity consolidated units upward in hierarchy

Hi experts,
We're doing reparenting of a cons unit (upward in a hierarchy) : The scenario is explained as under:
There are two hierarchies in a single version. The consolidation units falling under both hierarchies are same. Difference being - H1 is a flat hierarchy with parent A and all other as subsidiaries (100% owned and purchase method consolidated)
H2: Has multiple levels (conso groups) with overall parent A. All other companies are equity consolidated (ofcourse parents in each group is assigned purchase method, ownership is again 100% of all units)
In H2: we're doing a reparenting. From a lower conso group(cons group CGB with parent B) a unit(unit C) is moving to the top conso group(cons group CGA with parent A). The master data changes in both conso groups have been made(period/yr of divestiture and period/yr of acquisition set in the sender group and receiver group respectively; added the cons unit C in CGA group).
The organizational change logic is being used.
After the conso group change task and COI task are run, in the report there is a difference in the equity PY surplus at level A - overall parent) in both hierarchies.
There are two equity pickups - A/c1 and A/c2
The opening balances on these accounts are getting reversed in the divestiture period in old parent.
Whereas the PY - RE(Previous year - Retained earnings) account is not getting reversed (in itself) but the balance is being posted to COI:Clearing item (COI clearing item defined in COI settings->Appropriation of retained earnings -> Net income tab)
1. The client doesnt want PY equity surplus to change. In H1 , it is not changing (not reversing) whereas, in H2 it is reversing in the same accounts - balancing to zero.
2. They'd ideally want the PY surplus to goto the COI clearing.
They'd like the system to do this entry and not fix this by doing a manual PL30 journal.
Can you tell me if there is anything in the configuration of COI that can fix this issue?
Why is the system behaving differently for A/c1 (and A/c2)and PY - RE account?
Another thing, when I look at the COI documents posted in the H2 hierarchy, I see the A/c1 and A/c2 (scopes of data for equity method) as double the amount in the new cons group (equity holdings data) whereas in the H1 (where only a total transfer doc is posted) I see the accounts (as part of equity data) with the actual value.
Thanks, AJ
Edited by: A J on Nov 17, 2009 3:17 PM

Thanks Dan.
Appreciate if you can help on the below points as well.
1. As part of divestiture/transfer postings: The system is reversing some Previous Year(PY) equity accounts into themselves. How can we get the system to eliminate them by posting to COI Clearing account. Basically, we dont want the PY accounts to be touched?
For the Retained earnings - PY account, the system is actually posting to COI clearing account.
These PY accounts are part of some scopes for equitization.
Is there any link between the "balance carry forward" - list of items table and the divestiture postings?
Does the system check this table while posting/reversing the equity(PY) accounts?
2. I want to understand the sequence in which the system posts the documents at the old parent and new parent (group) level.
The same activity number is there for Total Divestiture, total transfer documents posted at new parent level and total divestiture document posted at old parent level.
Does the system follow bottom up approach? Thereby creating total divestiture document at old parent level.
Followed by documents at upper level (new parent level)
Also , at the upper level(new parent level), does it post documents in the way they are shown in the log? (We havent changed the default sequence maintained in UCWB - COI settings). so it will post first consolidation doc, followed by total divestiture, followed by total transfer docs at the new parent level?
Is this the reason for the double value being posted at new parent for equity holding data?
Will studying the statistical items (corresponding to eliminated equity holding items) be relevant here to understand why at upper level there is double the value being posted by system?
Thanks.

GL Posting effects consolidation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for