GL_SET_OF_BKS_ID in R12 Multi-Org Form

Hi,
I am migrating a 11i form into R12. In R12 it will be a Multi-Org form. For that I have created operating unit items for selecting operating unit.
I am using MO_GLOBAL.set_policy_context to set selected operating unit context.
I have 2 profiles being used in my form i.e. ORG_ID and GL_SET_OF_BKS_ID.
After doing all this exercise mentioned above, ORG_ID value is being retrieved correctly using FND_PROFILE.VALUE but still value of GL_SET_OF_BKS_ID is blank.
Is there any option available to set this profile value other than FND_PROFILE.put like MO_GLOBAL set ORG_ID value.
Regards,

For question 1:
Changing set_of_books_id to ledger_id in subledgers may be a very bit hit in datamodel changes.
I think they have changed that in SLA / GL, as Accounting Convention (4th C) has been added to SOB.
http://realworldoracleapps.blogspot.com/2009/02/r12-financials-overview-and-new.html
For question 2:
Yes, set_of_books_id and ledger_id are one and the same. SLA will take care of the mapping.
You may check the link http://www.orafaq.com/node/2242
By
Vamsi

Similar Messages

Multi Org in Release 12

As like in 11i, do we need to run multi org in Release 12.
If no needed, if it comes with default in release 12, what MO:operating unit will it take.

Multi-org conversion is not needed in R12.
Default operating unit defined by
MO:Default Operating unit is used to define operating unit at responsibility/user level.
For complete details on R12 Multi org ,refer to metalink id: 420787.1 --Oracle Applications Multiple Organizations Access Control for Custom Code
Regards,
alit
www.alsuminfotech.com

ESYU: R12 - Order Management를 위한 Multi Org Access Control(MOAC) setup 방법

Purpose
Oracle Order Management - Version: 12.0 to 12.0
Information in this document applies to any platform.
R12의 Order Management에 대핸 Multi Org Access Control(MOAC) setup 방법에 대해 알아본다.
Solution
일반적인 MOAC Setup:
1. HRMS에서 Security Profile을 정의:
a. HRMS Management responsibility 선택
b. HRMS Manager> Security> Profile로 이동
c. Security Profile이 정의되어 있는지 확인 (OM responsibility 혹은 Site level로)
d. 만일 아직 setup 되어져 있지 않다면 Operating Units를 입력
e. 저장
Note: 만일 위 d step과 같이 새로운 security profile을 생성하였다면 concurrent program 'Security List Maintenance'를 꼭 실행해야 한다.
그렇지 않으면 multiple operating units가 OM forms의 LOV에 나타나지 않을 것이다.
이 program은 multi-org access를 validating 하기 위해 사용하는 table에 data를 생성한다.
Navigation: HRMS Management> HRMS Manager> Processes & Reports> Submit Process & Report> Security List Maintenance
2. MO Profile Options setup:
a. MO: Security Profile - 이 profile setting은 MOAC functionality를 활성화 한다.
b. MO: Default Operating Unit - 이 Operating Unit는 OM forms과 report에서 default가 될 것이며, 이를 clear 하거나 변경하기 위해 LOV를 사용할 수 있다.
Keep the MO profiles in sync:
MO: Security Profile은 site와 responsibility level로 setting 할 수 있다.
MO: Default Operating Unit은 site, responsibility, user level로 setting 할 수 있다.
Application이 원하는대로 동작되지 않는것을 발견하면 이 profile options의 setting 값을 확인한다.
3. OM setup:
R12 upgrade 시 OM Profile에서 migrate 된 새로운 OM System Parameters를 확인:
Order Management Super User> Setup> System Parameters> Values
(See <<NOTE 393646.1>>-R12 Readiness Cheat Sheet: Migrated OM Profile Options)
4. Form에서 hidden field 'Operatin Unit'를 활성화시키고 default folder로 저장:
Sales Order and Order Organizer forms
Quick Sales order and Organizer forms
Sales Agreement forms
Pricing and Availability form
Other forms
Note: Sales Order form에서 hidden field 'Operating Unit'를 'Show' 하기 전에 fotm안에 이 field를 위한 공간을 만들어 놓아야 한다.
예를 들면 Customer Number field를 짧게 하거나 Operating Unit field로 이 field를 덮어씌울수 있다.
Reference
Note 393634.1

Hi Larry,
Have you considered adding the exec apps.mo_global.set_policy_context call to your connection's start-up script?
Tools -> Preferences -> Database -> Filename for connection startup scriptNot the most flexible approach, so I'm not sure if it is appropriate for your application, but just a thought. You might create distinct connection names with different start-up scripts for each org_id.
Regards,
Gary
SQL Developer Team

Multi-org Tables & Views in R12

We r in the process of upgrading Oracle Applications from 11i to R12. Now my question is
1. What about the Multi Org related tables once we get upgraded to R12 since the Multi Org choice is provided at the form level itself in R12.
2. Do the views related to Multi Org still exists in R12. If yes then what is purpose of the same.
Thanks in advance
Regards
-Mahesh

Anybody who hav Noticed the differences in Multi Org tables and Views in Database Level b/w ii1 and R12 plz answer this.
Regards
-Mahesh

Discoverer Reports does not work in Multi-org Environment after R12 Upgrade

Discoverer Reports does not work in Multi-org Environment after R12 Upgrade. Created a simple report using the below query:
SELECT po_header_id, segment1, type_lookup_code
FROM po_headers
WHERE segment1 = '5000002'
Query works perfectly fine; when i set the ORG_CONTEXT in the database using the command:
EXEC mo_global.set_policy_context('S',129)
But the report doesn't fetch any data when ran from an Org based responsibility. We've ensured that the MO: Operting Unit is set accurately and general Oracle reports (PLSQL Program OR XML Publisher) are working perfectly fine.
===========
I followed the steps provided in Metalink Note: 732826.1 - It works for some responsibilities where the MO: Security Profile is not set; but fails for those responsibilities where the MO: Security Profile is set.
I am looking for specific solution that works irrespective of either the MO: Operating Unit profile is set of not.
Please suggest. Appreciate your response.
Thanks,
Kesava Chunduri

Hi Hussein,
Thanks for the quick response.
Yes, I've gone thru both the notes specified below:
Discoverer Workbooks Based On Organization Enabled Views Are Not Populated [ID 1293438.1]
- Tried this option; but this option is messing up a couple of Oracle Standard Functionalities.
- For ex: If i set this profile option; we are not able to create any receipts using Custom Responsibilities.
I am able to create the receipt, when i remove this profile option.
No Data Shows for Reports in Discoverer 10g with Applications Release 12 [ID 1054380.1]
- I see that the products i am running these reports from AR/GL - already exists in these tables.
Anything other options??
Thanks,
Kesava

About Multi-ORG for EBS R12.1.1 .. Oracle error -20001 ORA-20001 APP-FND-02

I have two questions:
1. If I have only single organization, Do I need to set up multi-org? We will be using AR, AP, and GL modules only.
2. Is there any step-by-step process to set up multi-org?
I am getting error: "Oracle error -20001 ORA-20001 APP-FND-02901. You do not have access to any operating unit. Please check if your profile option MO:Security Profile includes any operating unit or the profile option MO: operating unit is set has been detected in MO_GLOBAL_INIT" when I access any form for Entry.
Thanks

1. If I have only single organization, Do I need to set up multi-org? We will be using AR, AP, and GL modules only.Yes.
2. Is there any step-by-step process to set up multi-org?https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=MultiOrg&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
I am getting error: "Oracle error -20001 ORA-20001 APP-FND-02901. You do not have access to any operating unit. Please check if your profile option MO:Security Profile includes any operating unit or the profile option MO: operating unit is set has been detected in MO_GLOBAL_INIT" when I access any form for Entry.Does this happen to all responsibilities?
Please see the steps in (ORA-20001: APP-FND-02901 Errors Encountered When "Requests" Tab is Selected from PFT or EPF [ID 859072.1]) to set the profile option at the responsibility level for the responsibility you are trying to access.
Thanks,
Hussein

Create one plan element for multi org in OIC R12

Hi There,
Can I create one plan element and use this plan element for 2 orgs, like US and CANADA?
In EBS R115, I have to create more than 100 plan elements in each org.
I want to know in R12 if i still need to do this. If I can create one set plan elements for multi orgs, will save a lot of time. The only difference of org US and CANADA is currency.
Thanks a lot !

It is same in R12 also. You need to do the same as what you did in 11i. Not much changes on plan definition side.

R12 limit the user privilage under multi-org situation

Hi
In R12, users needn't change the repsonsibilty to achieve the same transaction for multi-org.i.e. u can do the ou1,ou2....under the same AP responsibility.
while if i want to limit users privilage under this situation, user1 is just limited to the ou1, user2 is just limited to the ou2....how can i relaize it?
Any help will be preciated.
Regards,
Chelsea

you can achieve this easily...I would suggest go through Documentation atleast once. This Subject is very new.
Here is one senario how can it acheive for AP Invoice Entry
Responsibility: Payables
Navigation: Invoices:Entry > Invoices
On the Invoice Workbench, you can select an Operating Unit, or enter another field, such as PO or Supplier Site, from which the system will default an OU. Your list of available OUs is determined by your multi-org security profile defined in Oracle HR and associated to their responsibility through the MO Security Profile profile option.
How it works....once the application automatically provides the operating unit of new (uncommitted) invoices during entry. The following are methods by which the operating unit is derived:
1)Default Operating Unit from “MO: Default Operating Unit” Profile Option
2)Default Operating Unit from Invoice Batch Header
>>When entering invoice batches, users have the option of establishing a default operating unit for the invoices entered in the batch. This can be overridden at the invoice level as with any other value (Payment Method, for example) entered in the Invoice Batches window.
3)Derive Operating Unit from Transaction Attributes
>>>Oracle Payables will derive the operating unit of an invoice based on certain user entered attributes. If the user chooses a PO (via PO Default or QuickMatch features) or supplier site when the Operating Unit field is empty, the Operating Unit corresponding to the selected value will be populated onto the invoice.
4) Set Operating Unit from Single Operating Unit Security Profile
>>>>> That mean when a user’s security profile contains only one operating unit, it can be said that the user’s operating unit context has been “set” to this operating unit. This value is automatically defaulted to all new invoices and it cannot be overridden.
Hope this make sense.
same is true for other activity like payment , period close.Let me know , in case if you are not clear.
thanks

MO: Operating Unit Non Usable Operating Unit for Multi-Org Conversion

Hello Hussein
I enabled multi org in 11i and mo Operating unit values set as Non Usable Operating Unit for Multi-Org Conversion, is ok to set is value or will that cause any responsibility.
In R12.1.3 I am getting an error like this
APP-FND-02902: Multi-Org profile option is required. Please set either MO: Security Profile or MO: Operating Unit profile option.
Please advice
Thanks
Prince

user12094010 wrote:
Hello Hussein
I enabled multi org in 11i and mo Operating unit values set as Non Usable Operating Unit for Multi-Org Conversion, is ok to set is value or will that cause any responsibility.This might cause issues.
ORA-20001: APP-FND-2902: Multi-Org Profile Option is Required [ID 399910.1]
How To Prevent the Profile Option MO: Operating Unit being set to NULL at Site Level? [ID 393560.1]
In R12.1.3 I am getting an error like this
APP-FND-02902: Multi-Org profile option is required. Please set either MO: Security Profile or MO: Operating Unit profile option.
Please adviceR12 - Error ORA-20001, APP-FND-02902 Accessing Profile Classes Form With Multi-Org Access Control (MOAC) Enabled [ID 602141.1]
Unable To Open Customer Account Details, Error :ORA-20001: APP-FND-02902: Multi-Org profile option is required [ID 987165.1]
Entering to Profile Classes Gets Ora-20001, App-Fnd-02902. Multi Org Profile Option Is Required [ID 465132.1]
Error 'ORA-20001: APP-FND-02902: Multi-Org Profile Option Is Required' When Open Account Details [ID 1406860.1]
Some Web Pages Fail To Load After Patch Application [ID 1281328.1]
You may also search MOS website for APP-FND-02902 and go through the docs.
Thanks,
Hussein

Creating a cfhttp multi part form post for google docs upload

Hey all,
If you saw my last thread, you know I am working with google docs and uploading documents to it. Well I got basic document uploading working, but now I am trying to include meta data. Google requires you to include the metadata with the actual file data and seperate them by using a multi part form upload. I don't know exactly the process for doing so, but they have a handy code snippet of the desired results at
http://code.google.com/apis/documents/docs/3.0/developers_guide_protocol.html#UploadingDoc s
So I am basically trying to mimic that payload, however I am continually getting an error stating that there are no parts in a multi part form upload.
<errors xmlns='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005'><error><domain>GData</domain><code>InvalidEntryException</code><internalReason>No parts detected in multipart message</internalReason></error></errors>
to be exact. I am not really sure what I am doing wrong here. I figure it is one of two things, either I am not including the actual data in the payload properly (I am currently using a body type param for the payload, but I have also tried a formfield named content to deliver it. Neither worked). So maybe I need to do something else tricky there? The other thing which I am not reallly sure about is the content-length attribute. I don't know exactly how to calculate that, and I read in another forum that a content length attribute was messing that guy up. Right now I am just taking the lenght of the payload string and multiplying by 8 (to get the number of bytes for the entire payload) but hell if I know if that is right. It could be I just don't know how to set up the parts for the message, it seems pretty straight forward though. Just define a boundary in the content-type, then put two dashes before it wherever you define a new part, and two dashes trailing the last part.
Anyway, here is my code, any help is much appreciate. I'm a bit beyond my expertise here (not really used to trying to have to roll my own http requests, nevermind multipart post form data) so I'm kinda flailing around. Thanks again.
<cffunction name="upload" access="public" returnType="any" hint="I upload the document." output="false">
    <cfargument name="filePath" type="string" required="false" hint="file to upload.">
    <cfargument name="docType" type="string" required="yes" hint="The document type to identify this document see google list api supported documents">
    <cfargument name="parentCollectionId" type="string" required="no" hint="the name of the collection/collection to create (include collection%3A)">
    <cfargument name="metaData" type="struct" required="no" hint="structure containing meta data. Keyname is attribute name, value is the value">
    <cfset var result = structnew()>
    <cfset result.success = true>
    <cftry>
        <cfif structkeyexists(arguments,"parentCollectionId")>
                  <cfset arguments.parentCollectionId = urlencodedformat(parentCollectionId)>
                  <cfset result.theUrl = "https://docs.google.com/feeds/default/private/full/#arguments.parentCollectionId#/contents">
            <cfelse>
                    <cfset result.theUrl = "https://docs.google.com/feeds/default/private/full/">
        </cfif>
         <cfoutput>
              <cffile action="read" file="#arguments.filePath#" variable="theFile">
            <cfsavecontent variable="atomXML">
                 Content-Type: application/atom+xml
                <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
                <entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:docs="http://schemas.google.com/docs/2007">
                  <category scheme="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005##kind"
                      term="http://schemas.google.com/docs/2007###arguments.docType#"/>
                    <cfloop collection="#arguments.metaData#" item="key">
                        <#key#>#arguments.metadata[key]#</#key#>
                    </cfloop>
                </entry>
                --END_OF_PART
                Content-Type: text/plain
                #theFile#
                --END_OF_PART--
            </cfsavecontent>
        </cfoutput>
        <cfset result.postData = atomXML>
        <cfhttp url="#result.theUrl#" method="post" result="httpRequest" charset="utf-8" multipart="yes">
            <cfhttpparam type="header" name="Authorization" value="GoogleLogin auth=#getAuth()#">
            <cfhttpparam type="header" name="GData-Version" value="3">
            <cfhttpparam type="header" name="Content-Length" value="#len(trim(atomXML))*8#">
            <cfhttpparam type="header" name="Content-Type" value="multipart/related; boundary=END_OF_PART">
            <cfhttpparam type="header" name="Slug" value="test file --END_OF_PART">
            <cfhttpparam type="body" name="content" value="#trim(atomXML)#">
        </cfhttp>
        <cftry>
               <cfset packet = xmlParse(httpRequest.fileContent)>
            <cfif httpRequest.statusCode neq "201 created">
                <cfthrow message="HTTP Error" detail="#httpRequest.fileContent#" type="HTTP CODE #httpRequest.statusCode#">
            </cfif>
            <cfset result.data.resourceId = packet.entry['gd:resourceId'].xmlText>
            <cfset result.data.feedLink = packet.entry['gd:feedLink'].xmlText>
            <cfset result.data.title = packet.entry.title.xmlText>
            <cfset result.data.link = packet.entry.title.xmlText>
            <cfcatch>
                 <cfset result.data = httpRequest>
            </cfcatch>
        </cftry>
        <cfcatch type="any">
             <cfset result.error = cfcatch>
            <cfset result.success = false>
        </cfcatch>
    </cftry>
    <cfreturn result>
</cffunction>
Also, this is what my atomXML data ended up looking like when it got sent to google. This isn't the WHOLE request (it doesn't include the headers, just the body).
Content-Type: application/atom+xml
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:docs="http://schemas.google.com/docs/2007">
<category scheme="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#kind" term="http://schemas.google.com/docs/2007#document"/>
<TITLE>Woot Test</TITLE> </entry>
--END_OF_PART
Content-Type: text/plain
I'm a test document lol!
--END_OF_PART--

Woot, I got it. I had to send the gData version number, and change the URL.
Here is the working function.
<cffunction name="upload" access="public" returnType="any" hint="I upload the document." output="false">
    <cfargument name="myFile" type="string" required="false" hint="file to upload.">
    <cfset var result = "">
    <cfset theUrl = "https://docs.google.com/feeds/default/private/full">
    <cffile action="read" file="C:\website\xerointeractive\testing\test.txt" variable="theFile">
    <cfset fileSize = createObject("java","java.io.File").init("C:\website\xerointeractive\testing\test.txt").length()>
    <cfhttp url="#theURL#" method="post" result="result" charset="utf-8" >
        <cfhttpparam type="header" name="Authorization" value="GoogleLogin auth=#getAuth()#">
        <cfhttpparam type="header" name="Content-Type" value="text/plain">
        <cfhttpparam type="header" name="Slug" value="test file">
        <cfhttpparam type="header" name="GData-Version" value="3">
        <cfhttpparam type="header" name="Content-Length" value="#fileSize#">
        <cfhttpparam type="body" value="#theFile#">
    </cfhttp>
    <cfreturn result>
</cffunction>

Multi-Org impact on Oracle CRM modules especially on Oracle Service

Multi-Org impact on Oracle CRM modules especially on Oracle Service
====================================================
I have been searching for any information (notes,whitepapers/ presentation) on the impact of multi org implementation on Oracle Service module and so far not been able to find any either on metalink or on internet.
Any of you have any inputs on this ? Please provide the same if any.
basically,
Looking for the kind of security applied on SR creation form,Debrief form and charges form when a multi org is enabled.
I also tried to test this out in our instance and found that it seems to have no impact.
Gana

HI,
Yes indeed there is a impact of MULTI-ORG on the Service Module in 11i.
All the things are integrated now.
Everything is dependent on the MO:Operating Unit Profile Option and the setup which you had done.
1)
Security on SR creation Form:-
See you can implement the security, but for that you have to setup accordinglly and also to follow the process.
If you create 2 responsibilities with MO profile option different, then none of them will able to see the others data.
Note:-
But if you are using the instance to generate the SR, then you had to make it sure that the ITEM which you are using should be assigned to the Operating unit which is set in the MO profile Options of that responsibility.
2)
Debrief Form:-
As you must know that for debrief to work, you had to setup the Service Activities.
This is where you can define the security.
1) Create a Service activity,
2) Map it with BILLING TYPES
3) Map the Billing Types with Order Management Header and the Line Type
This the place where you can specify the Operating Unit.
When a user will log in and open a debrief form, then he will be able to see only those service activities which are mapped with the operating unit as that of set in MO Profile Option to the user.
3)
Charges:-
The same as the debrief is applied on the charges TAB.
Here you will only able to see the Service activites which are mapped with the operating unit as that of set in MO operating unit.
If you want ITEM level security, then you will be only able to see the items which are assigned to the Operating unit as that of set in the MO profile option.
Hope this will clear your doubt.
If want more clarification, you can ask me.
Regds,
Vikram

Converting to Multi-Org in the middle of upgrade process from 11.5.10.2 to

Hi all,
We are in the process of Upgrade from EBS 11.5.10.2 to R12.1.1 (FA and GL modules only)
We have 10 Set of books
we are NOT multi-org enabled
we understand that we have to convert to Multi-Org for R12
Our problem is :
We did not define any Operating units till now:
1- After some analysis, we decided to create one legal entity and one operating unit FOR EACH set of book
2- So we will have 10 Set of books , 10 Legal entities and 10 Operating units
3- We should run Adadmin utility option "convert to Multiple Organization architecture"
In the document "Upgrade Guide - Release 11i to 12.1.1"
"Before running this step, you must define an operating unit and set the site–level AOL profile option MO: Operating Unit to use your new operating unit. This profile option tells adadmin what operating unit it should use when converting your existing data. If you define additional operating units, the seed data will be replicated for all operating units"
4- Which Operating unit of the 10 defined operating unites should be set in the site–level AOL profile option MO: Operating Unit ??
And what about the remaining 9 Operating units ? What about running the Adadmin utility option should we run it one time only ?
Thanks in advance
Mohamed F.

Hi Mohammed,
The requirement is to define at least one operating unit and set the profile option, "MO: Operating Unit" at Site level, to that Operating Unit's value
If you define more than one Operating Unit, the replicate seed data process is run for all Operating Units.
So you can set it to any operating unit and run adadmin.
Please refer to
FAQ - Multiple Organizations Architechure (Multi-Org) [ID 165042.1]
Thanks

Multi Org Access Problem in Oracle Alerts

Hi All,
I created one Alert for sending an email through Oracle Alert, after sending the mail I need to update one column in the table to indicate that alert has been sent for this particular row.
Alert is sending mail correctly but it goes to update statement it throws following error:
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
BEGIN MO_GLOBAL.SET_ORG_ACCESS(0, null,'M'); END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-20001: APP-FND-02901: You do not have access privilege to any operating
unit. Please check if your profile option MO: Security Profile includes any
operating unit or the profile option MO: Operating Unit is set.
ORA-06512: at "APPS.APP_EXCEPTION", line 72
ORA-06512: at "APPS.MO_GLOBAL", line 638
ORA-06512: at line 1
APP-ALR-04020: Oracle Alert was unable to execute "&VALUE". Check that this file exists and that its read protection is set correctly.
both the profiles MO: Security Profile, MO: Operating Unit are alredy set but still I'm getting error.
My alert's update is simple update stement on custom table, Please guide.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Reetesh Sharma

Hi Reetesh ;
What is your OS and EBS level?
please check below Notes:
APP-FND-02901 error when trying to open OM Forms [ID 887512.1]
Convert to Multi-Org: Oracle error 20001:ORA-20001:Error occured during product initialization for MO [ID 413031.1]
XLAACCPB - Create Accounting Program fails with Oracle error -20001: ORA-20001: APP-FND-02901: You do not have access privilege to any operating unit [ID 753824.1]
When Running Concurrent Programs Get Oracle error -20001: ORA-20001: APP-FND-02901, Why? [ID 1061434.1]
Accessing Responsibilities after Applying Patchset Gives Ora-20001 on MO:Security Profile [ID 199842.1]
Hope it helps
Regard
Helios

Converting to Multi org

Hi All,
We have our production running on Oracle Applications 11.5.10.2 with 10g database, HRMS,payroll modules. We are planning for R12 upgrade and as a prerequisite we are analyzing about the multi org conversion. We are the medium size utility company operates on single location and time zone.
1. From the metalink document we understood that converting to multi org is mandatory for all customers(including hrms) planning to R12.
2. We would like to know the impact of converting to multi org on HRMS
3. The document 259546.1 says that there are scripts to create the lightweight operating unit and then running adadmin option would change the environment to multi org enables.
4. In our environment already hr organizations are defined and running for several years. As per the above statement do we need to run the script to create a new lightweight operating unit and run adadmin?. If so where can i find the script for creating the lightweight OU. We found the patch 5965493. But that patch is failed in our environment when executing funmodefou.sql
Can anyone please point us to a clear set of documents which explains the impact on HRMS and detail steps to convert to multi org.
I appreciate your help

1.select * from HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION where ORG_INFORMATION1 like 'Operating Unit Information'
2.select * from HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION where ORG_INFORMATION_CONTEXT like 'Operating Unit Information'
3. Select count(*) from hr_operating_units
count
0
4. SELECT O.BUSINESS_GROUP_ID , O.ORGANIZATION_ID , OTL.NAME , O.DATE_FROM , O.DATE_TO , O3.ORG_INFORMATION2 , O3.ORG_INFORMATION3 FROM HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS O, HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_TL OTL, HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION O2, HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION O3 WHERE O.ORGANIZATION_ID = O2.ORGANIZATION_ID AND O.ORGANIZATION_ID = O3.ORGANIZATION_ID AND O2.ORG_INFORMATION_CONTEXT||'' = 'CLASS' AND O3.ORG_INFORMATION_CONTEXT = 'Operating Unit Information' AND O2.ORG_INFORMATION1 = 'OPERATING_UNIT' AND O2.ORG_INFORMATION2 = 'Y' AND O.ORGANIZATION_ID = OTL.ORGANIZATION_ID AND OTL.LANGUAGE = userenv('LANG')
returns 0 records

Subledger Period Maintenace in Multi-Org Environment

Just upgraded to 11.5.9, enabled multi-org to add another operating unit but share the same GL set of books. If I close the period for one operating unit for either AP or AR, the periods also close in the other operating unit. Is there any way to separate the subledger closing process for both operating units?

Hi
I have a setup document for R12 AME regarding invoice approval process.
However i need to find out if i have the same for R11i.
I am not sure whether R12 ame approval doc will be of any help for you, however i can forward you the same if you need it.
Thanks
Manish Jain.

GL_SET_OF_BKS_ID in R12 Multi-Org Form

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for